Allergenicity of milk protein hydrolysate formulae in children with cow's milk allergy

Cow's milk protein hydrolysate formulae have been developed to lower or eliminate the allergenicity of cow's milk proteins, and to reduce the antigenic load and the risk of sensitization. Cross-reactivity between different hydrolysate formulae and cow's milk proteins has been demonstrated. We have studied 20 children (median age 31 months, range 15–76 months) with a history of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. All the children had immediate allergic respiratory and/or cutaneous and/or gastro-intestinal reactions to cow's milk ingestion. In addition, the children had positive prick skin tests and positive RAST to cow's milk. Prick skin test, RAST, and double-blind placebo controlled food challenges were performed with three different hydrolysate formulae: a casein hydrolysate formula and two whey formulae, one partially and one extensively hydrolyzed. All 20 children had immediate allergic reactions after the challenge test with cow's milk. Only 2/20 children had a positive challenge test with a casein hydrolysate formula (Alimentum): one developed asthma and one urticaria. Two of the 15 children challenged with an extensively hydrolysed whey formula (Profylac) developed perioral erythema. Nine out of 20 children had a positive challenge test with a partially hydrolysed whey formula (Nidina H.A.): four developed asthma, three urticaria and two lip oedema. All children had positive prick skin tests to cow's milk proteins (casein and/or lactalbumin); 9 to Nidina H.A.; 3 to Profylac, and 3 to Alimentum. Specific IgE antibodies to cow's milk were present in all children; in 13 to Nidina H.A., in 4 to Profylac, and in 3 to Alimentum.     

Correlation between skin prick test using commercial extract of cow''s milk protein and fresh milk and food challenges

The skin prick test (SPT) is regarded as an important diagnostic measure in the diagnostic work-up of cow's milk protein allergy. It is not known whether commercial extracts have any advantage over fresh milk. The aims of the study were to (i) compare the diagnostic capacity of SPTs for the three main cow's milk proteins (alpha-lactalbumin, casein and beta-lactoglobulin) with fresh milk and (ii) determine a cut-off that discriminates between allergic and tolerant children in a controlled food challenge. A study was carried out on 104 children consecutively attending two paediatric allergy clinics for suspected cow's milk allergy. A clinical history, SPTs with fresh cow's milk and commercial extracts of its three main proteins and a challenge test were performed on all the children. A study of the validity of the prick test was also performed by taking different cut-off points for fresh milk and its proteins. Twenty-eight of 104 challenge tests (26.9%) were positive. At a cut-off point of 3 mm, fresh milk showed the greatest negative predictive value (98%), whereas casein showed the greatest positive predictive value (PPV, 85%). Calculation of 95% predicted probabilities using logistic regression revealed predictive decision points of 12 mm for lactalbumin, 9 mm for casein, 10 mm for beta-lactoglobulin and 15 mm for fresh cow's milk. We found that the greater the number of positive SPTs for milk proteins, the more likely the positive response to challenge. Having a positive SPT for all three milk proteins had PPV of 92.3% and would seem more clinically useful than any cut-off. Both fresh milk and cow's milk extract of the three main proteins could be useful in the diagnostic work-up of cow's milk allergy. Finding positivity to all three cow's milk proteins seems to be a simpler and more useful way of avoiding oral food challenges.     

Anaphylaxis to sheep's milk cheese in a child unaffected by cow's milk protein allergy

A 5-year-old atopic boy unaffected by cow's milk protein allergy experienced several anaphylactic reactions after eating food containing “pecorino” cheese made from sheep's milk. Prick-prick tests were strongly positive to sheep's buttermilk curd and `pecorino' sheep's cheese. Skin prick tests to fresh sheep's milk and to goat's milk were also positive, whereas they were negative to all cow's milk proteins, to whole pasteurized cow's milk and to cheese made from cow's milk. Specific IgE antibodies were negative to all cow's milk proteins. Conclusion Sheep's milk and cheese derived from sheep's milk may cause severe allergic reactions in children affected and, as we report, in children not affected by cow's milk protein allergy. Received: 14 January 1997 and in revised form: 20 June 1997 / Accepted: 8 July 1997     

Follow-up of nutritional status and dietary survey in children with cow''s milk allergy

The nutritional status of children with cow's milk allergy was followed during an elimination diet in 19 children (9 boys and 10 girls) beginning at the mean age of two years (range 0.6-4.1 years). The cow's milk allergy had been verified in hospital by a challenge test at a mean age of 0.9 years (range 0.2-1.9 years). Weight, height and laboratory indices to test protein, mineral and vitamin status were measured at three follow-up visits at three-month intervals. In addition to cow's milk allergy all these children had some other food allergies, and six of the 19 children were allergic to soy protein. Only two of the 19 children were given a soy-based formula. In the diets of the other children, cow's milk was replaced by increasing amounts of other foodstuffs and supplementary calcium. At the beginning of the study the relative heights of the children were slightly retarded (-0.6 SD) and remained unchanged during follow-up (-0.8 SD at the end of the study). The relative weights were found to be decreased during follow-up (p less than 0.05). There was a significant reduction in serum prealbumin values; eight of the 19 children showed abnormally low values. Low serum zinc values were seen in 12 children. Serum iron concentration was low in two children and two had high serum alkaline phosphatase values. Seven-day food recording indicated that dietary intake of energy was below the recommendation in some children, but protein intake was high. Some children had low intakes of riboflavin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cow's milk protein intolerance and chronic constipation in children

Cow's milk protein (CMP) allergy was investigated in 25 children (age-range 3 months to 11 years) with chronic constipation. A diagnosis of constipation was made on the basis of a history of painful elimination of hard stools for at least 1 month, whether or not associated with a reduced frequency of stools or soiling. The children were evaluated using clinical parameters and the following laboratory tests: total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE); specific IgE (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) for whole cow's milk, α-lactoalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, and a food group; and skin-prick tests with whole milk, α-lactoalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, and casein. Following the evaluation, the children were submitted to a CMP-free diet for a period of 4 weeks. In seven patients (28%), constipation disappeared during the CMP-free diet and reappeared within 48–72 h following challenge with cow's milk. In two infants a rectal biopsy revealed allergic colitis and they therefore did not undergo the challenge. High serum levels of total IgE were observed in five of the children who showed a clinical improvement (71%), a positive skin-test in two (29%), and detectable specific IgE in two (29%). These results suggest that CMP allergy or intolerance should be considered as a cause of chronic refractory constipation in children, although the underlying mechanism still require further investigation.     

Higher serum eosinophil cationic protein levels in children with cow's milk allergy

BACKGROUND: In the pathogenesis of cow's milk allergy, abnormal immunologically mediated reactions play a basic role. Eosinophil activation also participates in the development of several allergies. The purpose of this study was to characterize the degree of this activation by measuring the serum level of eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) and establishing whether it is a useful parameter in monitoring oral cow's milk allergy. METHODS: The sECP level of 35 patients with previously confirmed cow's milk allergy (mean age, 16 months) was evaluated using a fluoroimmunoassay before the cow's milk rechallenge test and at 2 hours and 24 hours after cow's milk challenge. RESULTS: Of the 35 children with previously confirmed cow's milk allergy, 10 had positive clinical reactions after the milk rechallenge test, whereas 25 children had no reaction. The median sECP level of all the patients before the challenge test was significantly higher (12.4 microg/L) than that of the control group (4.3 microg/L) (P < 0.05). Two hours after the challenge, the median sECP of all patients (9.4 microg/L) was lower than the starting values. The median sECP levels were higher in children with positive challenge test results at all time points. However, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The normalization of sECP level may indicate the cessation of the cow's milk allergy. Therefore, the measurement of sECP may be helpful in determining the optimal time in which to repeat the challenge test, when the result will more likely be negative. The significant decrease of the sECP level 2 hours after the beginning of milk challenge test may be explained by the fact that this protein is excreted into the intestinal lumen.     

Lymphocyte response to cow's milk proteins in patients with cow's milk allergy: relationship to antigen exposure

The cellular immune response to cow's milk was measured in patients with challenge-proven cow's milk allergy (CMA), manifested with either gastrointestinal or skin symptoms. After 2–4 weeks on milk elimination, 44 children, mean (SD) age 15.7 (9.4) months, were challenged, and cow's milk-induced lymphocyte transformation was measured before the clinical challenge (Day 1) and / or one week later (Day 8). During the clinical challenge period, 17 (39%) patients showed gastrointestinal reactions, 9 (20%) had urticarial or eczematous skin eruptions, and 18 (41%) were negative to challenge. On Day 1, the mean [95% confidence interval] stimulation index for lymphocytes in patients manifesting CMA with gastrointestinal symptoms, 2.60 [1.60, 4.10], was significantly higher than that in patients with skin symptoms, 1.15 [0.60, 2.30], or patients with negative clinical challenge, 0.83 [0.64, 1.08], F = 9.0, p = 0.001. After the clinical challenge (Day 8), this cow's milk-induced lymphocyte proliferation response was abrogated. At the same time, CMA patients evidenced a significantly higher spontaneous lymphocyte proliferation response in RPMI medium-containing control cultures than those with negative clinical challenge. We conclude that in patients with CMA, the number of circulating cow's milk-sensitized lymphocytes is depleted or their function is impaired after clinical exposure to cow's milk antigens.     

Evidence for eosinophil activation in cow's milk allergy

To assist in identifying pathogenetic mechanisms in different clinical manifestations of cow's milk allergy (CMA), the involvement of eosinophil cells in immunoinflammatory reactions was evaluated. The study population comprised 28 patients, aged from 5.8 to 43.0 months, who had challenge-proven CMA, manifested either cutaneously (n = 17) or gastrointestinally (n = 11). A clinical cow's milk challenge was performed in hospital after a 4 week cow's milk elimination period. Eosinophil activation in vivo was studied by measuring the serum level of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) before the oral cow's milk challenge, mean (SD) 27 (12) hours after commencing the challenge and one week later. These results were compared to those of 80 non-allergic age-matched controls. During the challenge, the level of ECP increased from 6.2 (4.5, 8.0) μg/L to 20.0 (9.5, 30, 4) μg/L in CMA patients with skin manifestations but not in those with gastrointestinal symptoms. The increase was shown to be transient. We conclude that eosinophil degranulation is an important immunologic mechanism leading to allergic inflammation in cutaneously manifested CMA.     

Anaphylactic reaction to goat's milk in a cow's milk-allergic infant

Goat's milk has been used as a substitute for cow's milk in cow's milk-allergic individuals. It is currently advocated for this purpose in writings and internet resources directed at the lay person, and infant formula based on goat's milk is available in many countries. Clinically significant cross-allergenicity between cow's and goat's milk has been noted, but a life-threatening cross-reaction has not been reported. We describe a 4-month-old infant with immunologically documented cow's milk protein allergy but no prior exposure to goat's milk who developed anaphylaxis after the ingestion of commercial goat's milk. Subsequent skin prick testing demonstrated a specific reaction to goat's milk. Thus, the cross-allergenicity between cow's and goat's milk proteins can lead to life-threatening complications. Individuals allergic to cow's milk protein should avoid goat's milk and goat's milk products.     

Cow's milk protein allergy and gastro-oesophageal reflux

Evidence for cow's milk allergy was looked for prospectively in 15 children with recurrent vomiting. Whereas radiological examination showed gastro-oesophageal reflux to be present in all patients, 3 out of 15 children presented an enteropathy associated with an increased number of IgE plasmocytes in small intestinal biopsy tissue. These three patients did not improve with conventional medical therapy but a striking improvement occurred within 24 h on a cow's milk-free diet. We conclude that diagnostic confusion between gastrooesophageal reflux and cow's milk allergy can occur and that the presence of IgE plasmocytes in small intestinal biopsy tissue indicates IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy. All cases of intractable gastro-oesophageal reflux should be suspected of cow's milk allergy and investigated acrodingly.Abbreviation GER gastro-oesophageal reflux     

Adverse reactions to milk in infants

AIM: To study the age when symptoms of adverse reactions to milk occur, in premature and term children, the debut of various symptoms, immunoglobulin E (IgE)- and non-IgE-mediated reactions and the frequency of tolerance at 1 year. METHODS: Six hundred and eight children, 193 premature and 416 term infants, were followed. Symptomatic children were invited to a clinical examination. The criteria for the diagnosis were: histories of suspected cow's milk allergy (CMA) and proven IgE-mediated reactions to cow's milk or positive elimination/challenge tests. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 555 (4.9%) were diagnosed with adverse reactions to cow's milk. All had symptoms before 6 months of age. The main symptoms were: pain behaviour (13), gastrointestinal symptoms (7), respiratory symptoms, (6) and atopic dermatitis (1). One child had proven IgE to cow's milk. Premature and term infants displayed the same symptoms and age of debut. Thirteen children were tolerant to cow's milk at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Adverse reactions to milk start early in life, with pain behaviour, gastrointestinal, and respiratory symptoms being the most common, and rarely atopic dermatitis. Non-IgE-mediated reactions were the most frequent. Symptoms and age of debut were the same in premature and term infants. Half of the children tolerated cow's milk at age 1.     

Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia and cow's milk hypersensitivity in children with chronic constipation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of cow's milk allergy as evidenced by milk challenge and the findings of endoscopic and immunohistochemical examinations in children with chronic and refractory constipation. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-five study subjects (mean age, 8.3 +/- 3.3 years; range, 3-15 years; 17 girls) and 15 control subjects (mean age, 11.7 +/- 3.2 years; range, 2-15 years; 9 girls) were studied by colonoscopy and a 4-week cow's milk elimination and challenge. RESULTS: Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia was the most prominent endoscopic finding in half of the subjects (46%), mostly occurring patchily in the transverse colon. Histologic findings other than lymphoid accumulation and mildly increased density of eosinophils were few. During the milk elimination and with supportive medication, 83% of subjects remitted. Constipation and/or other gastrointestinal or skin symptoms relapsed only in one third (34%) during the cow's milk challenge, these having significantly higher densities of intraepithelial gammadelta + T cells ( P <.001) in the biopsy samples of the terminal ileum as compared with the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to find formal evidence for the presence of cow's milk allergy in children with chronic constipation.     

Cow's milk protein allergy through human milk

Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the first allergy that affects infants. In this population, the incidence rate reaches 7.5%. The multiplicity and aspecificity of the symptoms makes its diagnosis sometimes complicated, especially in the delayed type (gastrointestinal, dermatological, and cutaneous). CMPA symptoms can develop in exclusively breastfed infants with an incidence rate of 0.5%. It, therefore, raises questions about sensitization to cow's milk proteins through breast milk. Transfer of native bovine proteins such as β-lactoglobulin into the breast milk is controversial: some authors have found bovine proteins in human milk but others point to cross-reactivity between human milk proteins and cow's milk proteins. However, it seems that a small percentage of dietary proteins can resist digestion and become potentially allergenic. Moreover, some authors suspect the transfer of some of these dietary proteins from the maternal bloodstream to breast milk, but the mechanisms governing sensitization are still being studied. Theoretically, CMPA diagnosis is based on clinical observations, prick-test or patch-test results, and cow's milk-specific IgE antibody concentration. A positive food challenge test usually confirms the diagnosis. No laboratory test is available to make a certain diagnosis, but the detection of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the mother's milk, for example, seems to be advantageous since it is linked to CMA. Excluding cow's milk from the mother's diet is the only cure when she still wants to breastfeed. Usually, cow's milk proteins are reintroduced after 6 months of exclusion. Indeed, the prognosis for infants is very good: 80% acquire a tolerance before the age of 3 or 4 years. Mothers should not avoid dairy products during pregnancy and breastfeeding as preventive measures against allergy.     

Formula feeding during cow's milk allergy

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is an immunologically mediated reaction to cow's milk proteins, which affects infant and young children. Cow milk elimination requires either breast-feeding, with or without elimination diet in mother or the use of specific formulas, based on cow's milk protein extensively hydrolyzed, which fit 90-95% of children with cow's milk allergy. In others, still reactive to allergic remnants in hydrolysates, an amino acid based formula is the optimal option. The good tolerance of soy formulas in a reasonable proportion of children with cow's milk allergy make them useful, including as a 1(st)-choice alternative, except probably for those below the age of 6 months. Any elimination diet in children is at risk of nutritional deficiency so that a constant monitoring of the growth parameters should be kept in those children.     

The spectrum of cow''s milk allergy

Childhood cow's milk allergy is a diagnosis encompassing various syndromes. Antigen-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody interaction is classically involved in mast cell degranulation in IgE-mediated food allergy, while non-IgE mediated cow's milk allergy is mostly mediated by cellular mechanisms. The diagnosis of cow's milk allergy largely relies on a good knowledge of the clinical expression of the disease. In this educational review series, we describe three cases of cow's milk allergy, first a 7-yr-old girl with persisting IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy, second a 8-month-old boy with cow's milk induced flares of atopic dermatitis, and third a 6-yr-old boy with sheep and goat milk allergy, in the absence of cow's milk allergy. The cases are discussed and summarized with more general recommendations for the clinical management of cow's milk allergy.     

L'allergie aux hydrolysats de protéines du lait de vache. À propos de huit cas

BACKGROUND: The use of extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas is the best alternative for children with cow's milk allergy, though cases of allergies to hydrolyzed proteins have been reported. The aim of this study was to clarify from our experience the diagnostic, evolutive and therapeutic aspects of allergies to extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report eight cases of allergy to extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas seen between 1985 and 1998. The diagnostic criteria for allergy were either the appearance of immediate anaphylactic reactions after the ingestion of protein hydrolysate or a positive challenge test with the protein hydrolysate. RESULTS: Four children developed immediate anaphylactic symptoms after ingesting protein hydrolysate, and four children demonstrated subacute or chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. All children who developed acute anaphylactic symptoms had positive skin tests and specific IgF, antibodies (RAST) to cow's milk and/or hydrolyzed proteins. Conversely, in the four children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, skin tests and specific IgE antibodies were negative in three cases, but intestinal histology was abnormal in all of them when they were fed with a protein hydrolysate; this became normal after excluding the hydrolysate (data available in only two cases). Three children tolerated another protein hydrolysate form (whey vs. casein), four children had a favourable outcome when fed with human milk, and an amino-acid-based formula was successfully used in the most recent case. Nonhydrolyzed cow's milk proteins were tolerated after the age of 18 months in six children. Other atopic symptoms were observed in six children. CONCLUSION: Allergy to cow's milk protein hydrolysate is rare. The diagnosis is usually easy in children who develop acute anaphylactic symptoms, though intestinal histology is generally necessary for the diagnosis of allergy with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Treatment is based on the use of either another protein hydrolysate form (whey vs. casein) or an amino-acid-based formula.     

Proteomic evaluation of milk from different mammalian species as a substitute for breast milk

As milk represents the main source of nutrition for infants, the question of an effective human milk substitute becomes mandatory when a formula-fed baby is allergic to cows' milk proteins. In this case, formulas containing extensively hydrolysed milk proteins should be preferred, but even such a formula may cause allergic reactions in highly sensitive patients. If there is evidence of cows' milk allergy with IgE-associated symptoms, after 6 mo of age, a soy bean formula may be recommended only when tolerance to soy protein has been established by clinical challenge. In infants with allergic reactions to cows' milk proteins, even after extensive hydrolysation, proteomic techniques coupled to immunological methods may make it possible to select other milk products that do not contain the same allergens as ordinary cow's milk. In this paper, evidence will be presented that proteomic evaluation of proteins from different mammalian species may be a suitable method of testing whether proteins from the milk of different mammalian species may be used as a substitute for untreated bovine milk.

Conclusion: Proteomic evaluation of milk from different mammalian species may not only be of help when recommending suitable feeding in cases of cows' milk allergy but also gives new insight into the background to allergic reactions caused by milk proteins.     

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in infants during cow's milk food challenge

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in early childhood. The golden standard for the diagnosis of CMA is a food challenge after a period of elimination. Increased levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO) have been shown after bronchial allergen provocation. We evaluated whether FE_NO may also be a predictor of a positive reaction during cow's milk challenge in infants. Forty-four infants [mean age (range): 4.2 (3.7–4.6) months] suspected of CMA underwent an open food challenge with cow's milk formula administered in ascending quantities, starting with 2 ml and then 6, 20, 60 and 200 ml until a clinical reaction occurred. Off-line FE_NO samples were obtained during tidal breathing by means of a facemask covering infants' nose and mouth. FE_NO was measured twice before the challenge (baseline), immediately before each new dose of milk and after a positive reaction or after the last dose of milk. Eleven children showed immediate positive clinical responses to cow's milk, whereas 13 infants presented only a late-type reaction. FE_NO values before or after a positive reaction (either immediate or late) were not different from FE_NO values at baseline. Baseline FE_NO in infants with a positive reaction did not differ from FE_NO in infants without a reaction at any time point. We conclude that FE_NO values are not predictive and not related to the occurrence of a positive reaction during a cow's milk challenge in infants, suggesting that a positive reaction may not result from eosinophilic activation.     

The role of cow''s milk protein intolerance in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

The role of cow's milk protein intolerance in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was evaluated in 17 children. Cow's milk was excluded from the diet for at least 14 days without changing previously ineffective prednisone dosage. Six patients with minimal change or mesangial proliferation went into remission 3 to 8 days after elimination of cow's milk. After a period of 2-3 weeks of remission, cow's milk challenge was positive in three patients. After one year on a cow's milk-free diet, two of six patients became milk tolerant and are in remission of NS, one of six became steroid-dependent, two of six are still unable to tolerate cow's milk and are in remission on a cow's milk-free diet and one of six children was lost from observation. The role of cellular mechanisms in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome is suggested.     

Milk allergy school: Nutritional therapy in group for parents of children with cow''s milk allergy/intolerance in Primary Health Care

The objective of this study was to create a method for group nutritional therapy for parents of children with cow's milk allergy/intolerance in a paediatric primary care setting to increase accessibility to nutritional therapy. A second objective was to evaluate a milk allergy school. Follow-up time after the group session was 3 yr. All parents to newly diagnosed children (n=98) with cow's milk allergy/intolerance in the Primary Health Care system in the city of Goteborg during an 11-month period were invited. The majority of the families chose to participate (n=84, 86%). The mean age of the children was 9 months (3 months to 5 yr). The number of participants obtaining nutritional treatment within a month after diagnosis has significantly increased. Seventy-four families (88%) could be re-contacted 3 yr after participation for a second evaluation. Seventy-eight per cent of the children no longer had cow's milk allergy/intolerance. Most participants expressed satisfaction with the information obtained in the meeting. The milk allergy school does not replace but complements individual counselling. The milk allergy school seems to meet the families' needs for information, has few administrative routines and is cost-efficient. This activity has become permanent, is being offered weekly and can be recommended.