Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-resistant Depression: Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a widespread, severe, debilitating disorder that markedly diminishes quality of life. Medication is commonly effective, but 20–30 % of patients are refractory to medical therapy. The surgical treatment of psychiatric disorders has a negative stigma associated with it owing to historical abuses. Various ablative surgeries for MDD have been attempted with marginal success, but these studies lacked standardized outcome measures. The recent development of neuromodulation therapy, especially deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled controlled studies with sham stimulation and presents a potential therapeutic option that is both reversible and adjustable. We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to DBS for treatment-resistant depression to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure. We included only studies using validated outcome measures. Our review identified 22 clinical research papers with 5 unique DBS approaches using different targets, including nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum/ventral capsule, subgenual cingulate cortex, lateral habenula, inferior thalamic nucleus, and medial forebrain bundle. Among the 22 published studies, only 3 were controlled trials, and 2, as yet unpublished, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of subgenual cingulate cortex and ventral striatum/ventral capsule DBS were recently discontinued owing to inefficacy based on futility analyses. Overall, the published response rate to DBS therapy, defined as the percentage of patients with?>?50 % improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, is reported to be 40–70 %, and outcomes were comparable across studies. We conclude that DBS for MDD shows promise, but remains experimental and further accumulation of data is warranted.     

Pilot study of deep brain stimulation in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder ethnic Chinese patients

Aims: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is a promising alternative to ablative surgery in treatment of refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). A pilot study was conducted to assess 15‐month outcomes of DBS in patients with refractory OCD in Taiwan. Methods: Four adult patients with a 3‐year or more history of refractory OCD (Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale [Y‐BOCS] score of at least 28) met the criteria for DBS surgery. DBS electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the VC/VS. Stimulation was adjusted for therapeutic benefit and absence of adverse effects. Psychiatric evaluation was conducted preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow up at every 3 months for 15 months. Primary outcome measure was Y‐BOCS. Secondary outcomes included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM‐D), and the Global Assessment of Function Scale. Results: Mean severity of OCD was a Y‐BOCS score of 36.3 ± 2.1. At the end of 15 months' follow up, there was a 33.06% decrease in OCD severity (P = 0.001). Similar findings were seen for HAM‐D (32.51% reduction, P = 0.005), and Global Assessment of Function Scale (31.03% increase, P = 0.026). In terms of adverse effects, two patients suffered from hypomania episodes after several weeks of DBS stimulation, and one had transient hypomania‐like syndrome during DBS initial programming. One patient (Case 1) had an allergic reaction to implantation of the pulse generator in the chest, and another patient (Case 3) exhibited vertigo. Conclusions: We confirm that DBS of the VC/VS appears to be beneficial for improvements in function and mood among patients with treatment‐resistant OCD. Compared to previous studies examining the therapeutic effects of DBS, no serious adverse effects were observed.     

Cyclic versus continuous deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is effective for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but patients typically require high stimulation voltages and DBS comes with a risk for adverse events (AE).ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to advance DBS for OCD by optimizing energy efficiency and minimize adverse events using a cyclic form of stimulationMethodsThis double blind, randomized crossover trial compares 2 weeks of continuous versus cyclic DBS (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) in 16 patients with OCD. We compared OCD symptoms (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Y-BOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), AEs, battery life, cognitive performance and quality of life.ResultsAverage Y-BOCS scores at baseline increased significantly with 5.5 points (p = 0.006) in the cyclic condition. Average HAM-D and HAM-A scores increased with 2.2 (p = 0.088) and 2.8 points (p = 0.018). The overall health scale of quality of life worsened during cyclic DBS (p = 0.044). Patients reported on average 3.3 AEs during continuous stimulation and 4.4 AEs during cyclic stimulation (p = 0.175), though stimulation-related AEs such as headache and concentration problems reduced during cyclic DBS. Battery usage during continuous DBS was 0.021 V per hour compared to 0.008 V per hour during cyclic DBS.ConclusionThough specific stimulation-related AEs improved, cyclic stimulation (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) comes with a high relapse risk in patients with DBS for OCD. Cyclic DBS is no alternative for standard DBS treatment, but applicable in case of debilitating AEs.     

Long-term comparative effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder

BackgroundTwenty years after the first use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), our knowledge of the long-term effects of this therapeutic option remains very limited.ObjectiveOur study aims to assess the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of DBS in OCD patients and to look for possible predictors of long-term response to this treatment.MethodsWe studied the course of 25 patients with severe refractory OCD treated with DBS over an average follow-up period of 6.4 years (±3.2) and compared them with a control group of 25 patients with severe OCD who refused DBS and maintained their usual treatment. DBS was implanted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens (vALIC-Nacc) in the first six patients and later at the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) in the rest of patients. Main outcome was change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score between the two groups assessed using mixed models. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores.ResultsObsessive symptoms fell by 42.5% (Y-BOCS score) in patients treated with DBS and by 4.8% in the control group. Fifty-six per cent of DBS-treated patients could be considered responders at the end of follow-up and 28% partial responders. Two patients among those who rejected DBS were partial responders (8%), but none of the non-DBS group achieved criteria for complete response. HDRS and GAF scores improved significantly in 39.2% and 43.6% among DBS-treated patients, while did not significantly change in those who rejected DBS (improvement limited to 6.2% in HDRS and 4.2% in GAF scores). No statistically significant predictors of response were found. Mixed models presented very large comparative effect sizes for DBS (4.29 for Y-BOCS, 1.15 for HDRS and 2.54 for GAF). Few patients experienced adverse effects and most of these effects were mild and transitory.ConclusionsThe long-term comparative effectiveness and safety of DBS confirm it as a valid option for the treatment of severe refractory OCD.     

Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of depression

Blomstedt P, Sjöberg RL, Hansson M, Bodlund O, Hariz MI. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of depression. Objective: To present the technique of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and to evaluate the studies conducted on DBS in the treatment of therapy‐refractory major depressive disorder (MDD). Method: A review of the literature on DBS in the treatment of MDD was conducted. Results: The results of DBS in MDD have been presented in 2 case reports and 3 studies of 47 patients operated upon in 5 different target areas. Positive effects have been presented in all studies and side effects have been minor. DBS in the nucleus accumbens resulted in a mean reduction of Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) of 36% after 1 year and 30% of the 10 patients achieved remission. DBS in the internal capsule/ventral striatum resulted in a reduction of 44% after 1 year, and at the last evaluation after in mean 2 years, 40% of the 15 patients were in remission. The 20 patients with subcallosal cingulated gyrus DBS had a reduction of HDRS of 52% after 1 year, and 35% were within 1 point from remission or in remission. Conclusion: DBS is a promising treatment for therapy‐refractory MDD. The published experience is, however, limited, and the method is at present an experimental therapy.     

A Randomized Trial Directly Comparing Ventral Capsule and Anteromedial Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Clinical and Imaging Evidence for Dissociable Effects

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging treatment for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We compared the efficacy of ventral capsule/ventral striatal (VC/VS) and anteromedial subthalamic nucleus (amSTN) DBS in the same patients and tested for mechanistic differences on mood and cognitive flexibility and associated neural circuitry. The possible synergistic benefit of DBS at both sites and cognitive behavioral therapy was explored.

Deep brain stimulation affects conditioned and unconditioned anxiety in different brain areas

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) has proven to be an effective treatment for therapy refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder. Clinical observations show that anxiety symptoms decrease rapidly following DBS. As in clinical studies different regions are targeted, it is of principal interest to understand which brain area is responsible for the anxiolytic effect and whether high-frequency stimulation of different areas differentially affect unconditioned (innate) and conditioned (learned) anxiety. In this study, we examined the effect of stimulation in five brain areas in rats (NAc core and shell, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), internal capsule (IC) and the ventral medial caudate nucleus (CAU)). The elevated plus maze was used to test the effect of stimulation on unconditioned anxiety, the Vogel conflict test for conditioned anxiety, and an activity test for general locomotor behaviour. We found different anxiolytic effects of stimulation in the five target areas. Stimulation of the CAU decreased both conditioned and unconditioned anxiety, while stimulation of the IC uniquely reduced conditioned anxiety. Remarkably, neither the accumbens nor the BNST stimulation affected conditioned or unconditioned anxiety. Locomotor activity increased with NAc core stimulation but decreased with the BNST. These findings suggest that (1) DBS may have a differential effect on unconditioned and conditioned anxiety depending on the stimulation area, and that (2) stimulation of the IC exclusively reduces conditioned anxiety. This suggests that the anxiolytic effects of DBS seen in OCD patients may not be induced by stimulation of the NAc, but rather by the IC.     

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment of therapy-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD): a case study highlighting neurocognitive and psychiatric changes

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder characterized by repeated, unwanted thoughts and behaviors. Individuals with this condition often experience significant emotional distress secondary to their symptoms. Additionally, impairments in attention/concentration, processing speed, and executive functions are typically observed. The exact pathology of OCD remains unknown; consequently, it can be difficult to treat patients with severe symptomatology. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be a viable treatment option for individuals who do not respond to medication and/or cognitive behavioral therapy. The following case discusses DBS of the anterior limb of the internal capsule for a patient with severe, therapy-refractory OCD, including pre- to postoperative neurocognitive and psychiatric changes.     

Deep brain stimulation for autism spectrum disorder

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a medical treatment that aims to obtain therapeutic effects by applying chronic electrical impulses in specific brain structures and neurological circuits. Over the years, DBS has been studied for the treatment of many psychiatric disorders. Scientific research on the use of DBS in people with autism has focused this interest mainly on treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder, drug-resistant epilepsy, self-injurious behaviors (SIB), and aggressive behaviors toward the self. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) includes a group of developmental disabilities characterized by patterns of delay and deviance in the development of social, communicative, and cognitive skills and the presence of repetitive and stereotyped behaviors as well as restricted interests. People with autism often have numerous medical and psychiatric comorbidities that worsen the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms can be found in up to 81.3% of people with autism. They are often severe, refractory to treatment, and particularly difficult to treat. SIB has a high prevalence in severely retarded individuals and is often associated with autism. Drug treatment of both autism and SIB presents a therapeutic challenge. To describe the current state of the art regarding the efficacy of DBS in people with ASD, a literature search was conducted for relevant studies using the PubMed database. Thirteen studies have been considered in this paper. Up to date, DBS has been used for the stimulation of the nucleus accumbens, globus pallidus internus, anterior limb of the internal capsule, ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule, basolateral amygdala, ventral capsule and ventral striatum, medial forebrain bundle, and posterior hypothalamus. In the total sample of 16 patients, 4 were adolescents, and 12 were adults. All patients had symptoms resistant to multiple drug therapy. Many patients taken into consideration by the studies showed clinical improvements as evidenced by the scores of the psychopathological scales used. In some cases, clinical improvements have varied over time, which may require further investigation. Among the new therapeutic perspectives, DBS could be a valid option. However, further, and more in-depth research is needed in this field.     

Detecting consciousness in a total locked-in syndrome: An active event-related paradigm

Abstract

Objective: To descirbe smiling and euphoria induced by deep brain stimulation (DBS). Background and Significance: The brain systems inducing emotional experiences and displays are not entirely known, but the ventral striatum including the nucleus accumbens have been posited to play a critical role in mediating emotions with positive valence. DBS has been successfully employed for the treatment of movement disorders, and most recently obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The purpose of this report is to describe the emotional changes associated with stimulation of the ventral striatum. Methods: A single patient with intractable OCD had electrode arrays placed in the right and left anterior limbs of the internal capsule and region of the nucleus accumbens. Changes in facial movement during stimulation were quantified by video recording. Ten video segments, time locked to the onset of stimulation, were digitized and changes in pixel intensity that occurred over both sides of the lower face, on a frame by frame basis, following stimulation onset were computed. These summed changes in pixel intensity represented the dependent variable of “entropy” and directly corresponded to changes in light reflectance that occur during facial movement. Results: During stimulation on both the right and left side, the patient consistently developed a half smile on the side of the face contralateral to the stimulating electrode, and also became euphoric. The effect ceased when DBS was discontinued. Conclusions: DBS in the region of the nucleus accumbens produced smile and euphoria suggesting that alterations in the ventral striatum may result in emotional experience and displays. We hypothesize the existence of a limbic-motor network responsible for such changes. This observation suggests that DBS may be useful as a therapy for mood disorders.     

Advancing deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Evaluation of: Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67(10), 1061-1068 (2010). Herein we review a prospective trial of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of severely debilitating, medication-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) recently published in Archives of General Psychiatry by Denys et al. This prospective 16-subject study, while having some technical limitations, is an excellent addition to the existing literature supporting the use of DBS in the region of the nucleus accumbens for severe OCD. It provides further evidence of efficacy and safety, sham versus active stimulation evidence that this efficacy is real, and several key observations on how DBS interacts with the brain that can shed light on the neuropathophysiology of OCD itself.     

Effects of deep brain stimulation on prepulse inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Owing to a high response rate, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral striatal area has been approved for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (tr-OCD). Many basic issues regarding DBS for tr-OCD are still not understood, in particular, the mechanisms of action and the origin of side effects. We measured prepulse inhibition (PPI) in treatment-refractory OCD patients undergoing DBS of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and matched controls. As PPI has been used in animal DBS studies, it is highly suitable for translational research. Eight patients receiving DBS, eight patients with pharmacological treatment and eight age-matched healthy controls participated in our study. PPI was measured twice in the DBS group: one session with the stimulator switched on and one session with the stimulator switched off. OCD patients in the pharmacologic group took part in a single session. Controls were tested twice, to ensure stability of data. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between controls and (1) patients with pharmacological treatment and (2) OCD DBS patients when the stimulation was switched off. Switching the stimulator on led to an increase in PPI at a stimulus-onset asynchrony of 200 ms. There was no significant difference in PPI between OCD patients being stimulated and the control group. This study shows that NAcc-DBS leads to an increase in PPI in tr-OCD patients towards a level seen in healthy controls. Assuming that PPI impairments partially reflect the neurobiological substrates of OCD, our results show that DBS of the NAcc may improve sensorimotor gating via correction of dysfunctional neural substrates. Bearing in mind that PPI is based on a complex and multilayered network, our data confirm that DBS most likely takes effect via network modulation.     

Panic and fear induced by deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND: Mood, cognitive, and behavioural changes have been reported with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the thalamus, globus pallidus interna, and anterior limb of the internal capsule/nucleus accumbens region. OBJECTIVE: To investigate panic and fear resulting from DBS. METHODS: Intraoperative DBS in the region of the right and then left anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region was undertaken to treat a 52 year old man with treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Mood, anxiety, OCD, alertness, heart rate, and subjective feelings were recorded during intraoperative test stimulation and at follow up programming sessions. RESULTS: DBS at the distal (0) contact (cathode 0-, anode 2+, pulse width 210 ms, rate 135 Hz, at 6 volts) elicited a panic attack (only seen at the (0) contact). The patient felt flushed, hot, fearful, and described himself as having a "panic attack." His heart rate increased from 53 to 111. The effect (present with either device) was witnessed immediately after turning the device on, and abruptly ceased in the off condition CONCLUSIONS: DBS of the anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region caused severe "panic." This response may result from activation of limbic and autonomic networks.     

脑深部电刺激在难治性强迫症治疗中的研究进展

强迫症是一组以强迫思维和(或)强迫行为为主要表现的精神疾病,目前临床上的一线治疗方案为5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和认知行为治疗。但仍有约40%~60%患者对一线治疗反应不佳或无效,称之为难治性强迫症。2009年美国及欧洲药监局批准的脑深部电刺激(deep brain stimulation,DBS)技术,作为一种神经调控的新型疗法能安全有效地改善难治性强迫症患者的症状。我们总结了现阶段对强迫症发病机制的了解,阐述了DBS应用于强迫症的历史和最新进展,并对其治疗机制、疗效、安全性、局限性及今后的发展方向等进行了综述。     

Long-Term Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Outcome and Quality of Life at Four to Eight Years Follow-Up

BackgroundObsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe disabling disease, and around 10% of patients are considered to be treatment-resistant (tr) in spite of guideline-based therapy. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as a promising treatment for patients with trOCD. However, the optimal site for stimulation is still a matter of debate, and clinical long-term follow-up observations including data on quality of life are sparse. We here present six trOCD patients who underwent DBS with electrodes placed in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis/anterior limb of the internal capsule (BNST/ALIC), followed for four to eight years after lead implantation.Materials and MethodsIn this prospective observational study, six patients (four men, two women) aged 32–51 years and suffering from severe to extreme trOCD underwent DBS of the BNST/ALIC. Symptom severity was assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and quality of life using the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment scale (WHO-QoL BREF). Follow-up was obtained at least for four years in all patients.ResultsWith chronic DBS for four to eight years, four of the six patients had sustained improvement. Two patients remitted and two patients responded (defined as >35% symptom reduction), while the other two patients were considered nonresponders on long-term. Quality of life markedly improved in remitters and responders. We did not observe peri-interventional side effects or adverse effects of chronic stimulation.ConclusionsChronic DBS of ALIC provides long-term benefit up to four to eight years in trOCD, although not all patients take profit. Targeting the BNST was not particularly relevant since no patient appeared to benefit from direct stimulation of the BNST. Quality of life improved in DBS responders, documented by improved QoL scores and, even more important, by regaining of autonomy and improving psychosocial functioning.     

Treating post-traumatic tremor with deep brain stimulation: Report of five cases

BackgroundPost-traumatic tremor is one of the most common movement disorders resulting from severe head trauma. However, literature regarding successful deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment is scarce, resulting in ambiguity regarding the optimal lead location. Most cases support the ventral intermediate nucleus, but there is evidence to defend DBS of the zona incerta, ventral oralis anterior/posterior, and/or a combination of these targets. We report five patients with disabling post-traumatic tremor treated with DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus and of the globus pallidus internus.MethodsPatients were referred to the Vanderbilt Movement Disorders Division, and surgical intervention was determined by a DBS Multidisciplinary Committee. Standard DBS procedure was followed.ResultsPatients 1–4 sustained severe diffuse axonal injuries. Patients 1–3 underwent unilateral ventral intermediate nucleus DBS for contralateral tremor, while Patient 4 underwent bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus DBS. Patients 1–3 experienced good tremor reduction, while Patient 4 experienced moderate tremor reduction with some dystonic posturing of the hands. Patient 5 had dystonic posturing of the right upper extremity with tremor of the left upper extremity. He was treated with bilateral DBS of the globus pallidus internus and showed good tremor reduction at follow-up.ConclusionUnilateral or bilateral DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus and bilateral DBS of the globus pallidus internus may be effective and safe treatment modalities for intractable post-traumatic tremor. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal target for surgical treatment of post-traumatic tremor.     

The anteromedial GPi as a new target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive compulsive disorder

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now well established in the treatment of intractable movement disorders. Over the past decade the clinical applications have expanded into the realm of psychosurgery, including depression and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The optimal targets for electrode placement in psychosurgery remain unclear, with numerous anatomical targets reported for the treatment of OCD. We present four patients with Tourette’s syndrome and prominent features of OCD who underwent DBS of the anteromedial globus pallidus internus (GPi) to treat their movement disorder. Their pre-operative and post-operative OCD symptoms were compared, and responded dramatically to surgery. On the basis of these results, we propose the anteromedial (limbic) GPi as a potential surgical target for the treatment of OCD, and furnish data supporting its further investigation as a DBS target for the treatment of psychiatric conditions.     

Variability and anatomical specificity of the orbitofrontothalamic fibers of passage in the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS): precision care for patient-specific tractography-guided targeting of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that can reduce symptoms in medically intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Conceptually, DBS of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) region targets reciprocal excitatory connections between the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and thalamus, decreasing abnormal reverberant activity within the OFC-caudate-pallidal-thalamic circuit. In this study, we investigated these connections using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) on human connectome datasets of twenty-nine healthy young-adult volunteers with two-tensor unscented Kalman filter based tractography. We studied the morphology of the lateral and medial orbitofrontothalamic connections and estimated their topographic variability within the VC/VS region. Our results showed that the morphology of the individual orbitofrontothalamic fibers of passage in the VC/VS region is complex and inter-individual variability in their topography is high. We applied this method to an example OCD patient case who underwent DBS surgery, formulating an initial proof of concept for a tractography-guided patient-specific approach in DBS for medically intractable OCD. This may improve on current surgical practice, which involves implanting all patients at identical stereotactic coordinates within the VC/VS region.     

Investigating Deep Brain Stimulation of the Habenula: A Review of Clinical Studies

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the current scientific literature on deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the habenula for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).Materials and MethodsTwo authors performed independent data base searches using the PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Web of Science search engines. The data bases were searched for the query (“deep brain stimulation” and “habenula”). The inclusion criteria involved screening for human clinical trials written in English and published from 2007 to 2020. From the eligible studies, data were collected on the mean age, sex, number of patients included, and disorder treated. Patient outcomes of each study were summarized.ResultsThe search yielded six studies, which included 11 patients in the final analysis. Treated conditions included refractory depression, bipolar disorder, OCD, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Patients with bipolar disorder unmedicated for at least two months had smaller habenula volumes than healthy controls. High-frequency stimulation of the lateral habenula attenuated the rise of serotonin in the dorsal raphe nucleus for treating depression. Bilateral habenula DBS and patient OCD symptoms were reduced and maintained at one-year follow up. Low- and high-frequency stimulation DBS can simulate input paths to the lateral habenula to treat addiction, including cocaine addiction. More data are needed to draw conclusions as to the impact of DBS for schizophrenia and obesity.ConclusionsThe habenula is a novel target that could aid in reducing neuropsychiatric symptoms and should be considered in circuit-specific investigation of neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders. More information needs to be gathered and assessed before this treatment is fully approved for treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions.