Detection of bullous lung disease: conventional radiography vs digital storage phosphor radiography

The detection of fine linear contours and altered aeration are requirements for the radiologic diagnosis of bullous lung disease and are severe measures of the spatial and contrast resolution of chest imaging systems. We compared plain film radiography with five postprocessing algorithms of storage phosphor digital radiography (2144 x 1744 x 10 bit matrix with 0.2-mm pixel size) in the detection of CT-proved bullous lung disease (35 patients and 25 normal control subjects). Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis of 2160 observations by six interpreters was done to evaluate the observers' performance. By analysis of variance (p less than .05), we found that the default digital algorithm and the three edge-enhancing algorithms of high and medium frequencies performed less well than plain films did, but the differences fell short of statistical significance. Gray-scale reversal was the only digital algorithm that performed significantly less well than plain films did. We conclude that any differences between digital algorithms and plain films in the detection of bullous lung disease were too small to be detected in this study. Any difference between the two methods in providing clinically important, diagnostic information is likely to be insignificant.     

Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience

To determine the value of contrast material-enhanced three-dimensional turbo magnetic resonance (MR) angiography compared with conventional cut-film or digital subtraction angiography for evaluating arterial stenosis in the abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. For detection of significant stenosis, MR angiography had 91% sensitivity and 89% specificity. This technique is highly sensitive in lesion detection, but stenosis tended to be overestimated.     

Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography

The aim of this study was comparative analysis of rejected radiographs in conventional and digital radiology under the aspects number of rejected images and reasons for rejection. During 2 months waste films of conventional radiography were collected; in digital radiography each image-delete command at the postprocessing workstation was documented. Rejected images were analysed and assigned to four categories. The overall reject rate was 27.6 % in the conventional and 2.3 % in the digital department. Whereas in the conventional department the main reason for rejection was “exposure” and “others” (i. e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the digital environment was “positioning”. The high exposure tolerance of digital systems markedly reduces the amount of faulty images. This is not only economically rewarding, but may also reduce unnecessary X-ray exposure of patients due to image retake. Received: 9 September 1998; Revision received: 23 November 1998; Accepted: 7 January 1999     

Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography

Conventional film radiography (FR) and six postprocessing algorithms of isodose storage phosphor digital radiography (SR) (0.2-mm X 10-bit pixel matrix) were compared in the evaluation of 40 mediastinal and 30 pulmonary lesions in 60 patients who underwent computed tomography of the chest. The six SR algorithms varied among each other in only one image parameter. One algorithm approximated conventional image characteristics. The other five algorithms were designed to optimize imaging of the mediastinum and tested the effects of gray-scale reversal, adjustment of optical density, a linear instead of a sigmoid gradation curve, and moderate edge enhancement of high and medium spatial frequencies. Performance was evaluated by calculating the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) of 5,040 observations by six readers. Post-processing with high-frequency edge enhancement and density optimization for the mediastinum significantly improved performance of SR over FR in the detection of mediastinal lesions (Az = .80 +/- .02 vs .73 +/- .01, respectively). Gray-scale reversal significantly decreased performance (Az = .64 +/- .03). All SR algorithms that were postprocessed to optimize imaging of the mediastinum were significantly inferior to FR in the detection of pulmonary lesions.     

Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography

High-resolution digital images make up very large data sets that are relatively slow to transmit and expensive to store. Data compression techniques are being developed to address this problem, but significant image deterioration can occur at high compression ratios. In this study, the authors evaluated a form of adaptive block cosine transform coding, a new compression technique that allows considerable compression of digital radiographs with minimal degradation of image quality. To determine the effect of data compression on diagnostic accuracy, observer tests were performed with 60 digitized chest radiographs (2,048 x 2,048 matrix, 1,024 shades of gray) containing subtle examples of pneumothorax, interstitial infiltrate, nodules, and bone lesions. Radiographs with no compression, with 25:1 compression, and with 50:1 compression ratios were presented in randomized order to 12 radiologists. The results suggest that, with this compression scheme, compression ratios as high as 25:1 may be acceptable for primary diagnosis in chest radiology.     

Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify the dose reduction by use of a CsI-flat panel digital radiography (DR)-system compared with digital computed radiography (CR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A TCDD-test using the CDRAD-phantom was performed at mAs-values of 5, 4, 2.5, 2, 1, and 0.5 mAs for both digital systems. Entrance surface doses were recorded for all images. Images were presented to four independent observers. For quantitative comparison the image quality figure (IQF) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation and the Wilcoxon test. A ROC analysis was performed using the TRG-phantom. Settings of 4, 2.5, 2 mAs for both systems were used. In addition, 1 and 0.5 mAs were used for the DR system only. Statistical significance was evaluated using Student test. RESULTS: The DR system provided equivalent results compared with CR with respect to high frequency information and superior results with respect to low contrast details. Compared with computed radiography, the flat panel detector demonstrated significantly lower IQFs, ensuring a better image quality with respect to contrast and detail detectability. IQFs for DR and CR were equal at a surface dose reduction of 87% for DR. ROC analysis revealed significantly higher values under the curve for DR up to a surface dose reduction of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Image quality of DR proved to be far superior to CR in particular for low contrast details. The image quality of CR is similar to that of DR only at high dose levels.     

Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic potential of direct digital radiography with conventional film for detecting experimental root fractures. METHODS: Two hundred and one extracted single-rooted human teeth were endodontically instrumented and divided into two groups, a control group of 100 teeth and a fractured group of 101 teeth in which root fractures were produced experimentally. Each tooth was imaged using the paralleling technique with a CCD-based digital system and D-speed film. The images were interpreted by an experienced radiologist without prior knowledge of the distribution of the root fractures. The degree of agreement in detecting root fractures with each imaging system compared with the actual condition was expressed as the kappa value. The difference between the radiographic systems was then assessed by chi(2)-test at the 95% significance level. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement between the digital system and the actual condition (kappa=0.71; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62 to 0.80) and close agreement between the film and the actual condition (kappa=0.63; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.53 to 0.74). However, this difference was not significantly different (P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of CCD-based digital radiography in detecting root fractures is similar to film-based radiography.     

Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film

This study was performed to compare the performances of observers using three display formats for chest radiography. The display formats were conventional radiographs, digitized radiographs (2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits) printed on laser film, and digitized radiographs (2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits) displayed on a high-resolution (2,560 X 2,048 X 12-bit) gray-scale display. The test set for the study consisted of 163 cases. Sixty-four of the cases were normal, whereas the 99 remaining cases demonstrated one or more common radiographic abnormalities. Nine abnormalities were selected for analysis: costophrenic angle blunting, interstitial disease, atelectasis, pneumothorax, parenchymal mass, consolidation, obstructive disease, hilar/mediastinal mass, and apical scarring. Six experienced general radiologists participated in the evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each abnormality and display format. The results indicate that, while the three display formats are equivalent for the detection of some abnormalities, detectable differences in observer performance may be seen even at 2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits for the detection of obstructive disease, pneumothorax, interstitial disease, and parenchymal masses.     

Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor

In this pilot study, conventional and digital radiography of the chest was compared in 170 patients. Two digitized radiographs, one frequency modified and one simulating the conventional film-screen combination, and the conventional films were reviewed independently by 5 radiologists with different experience. In spite of the smaller size and lower spatial resolution of the digitized compared with the conventional radiograph, only slight differences were revealed in the observation of different pulmonary and mediastinal changes. Digitized radiography is therefore considered suitable for chest examinations.     

Screening for tracheobronchial diseases with digital storage phosphor radiography]

Digital storage phosphor radiography (FCR: Fuji computed radiography) has a wide dynamic range and unique postprocessing capabilities. This study was designed to test whether chest imaging with FCR and its image processing would increase the accuracy of and confidence in the diagnosis of tracheobronchial abnormalities. In a phantom study, the performance of digital images having the appearance of a conventional chest radiograph was compared with that of a conventional system in detecting simulated tracheobronchial nodules. The digital images of lower kilovoltage (ROC area = 0.647 +/- 0.035) were equivalent to the conventional radiographs (ROC area = 0.620 +/- 0.028). On the other hand, nodule detectability was significantly improved in the digital images of higher kilovoltage (ROC area = 0.826 +/- 0.020). The author also compared the impact of five postprocessing algorithms (standard image, wide latitude image, enhanced image, reversed image, and subtraction image). ROC analysis indicated that the default standard image (ROC area = 0.826 +/- 0.020) was as good as an image with a linear rather than a sigmoid gradation curve (ROC area = 0.843 +/- 0.020), an image with strong enhancement of high frequencies (ROC area = 0.804 +/- 0.020), and an image with reversed gray scale polarity (ROC area = 0.775 +/- 0.015). Therefore these specific algorithms had no effect on the detection of tracheobronchial nodules. However, digital subtraction soft tissue images (ROC area = 0.961 +/- 0.030) were significantly better than the control images. Clinical study also indicated that subtraction images improve diagnostic accuracy in tracheobronchial diseases.     

Screening for asbestos-related pleural disease with digital storage phosphor radiography

Digital storage phosphor radiography (SR) has a wide dynamic range and unique postprocessing capabilities that may improve the performance of screening studies for asbestos-related pleural disease compared with conventional film radiography (FR). In a group of 32 asbestos-exposed and nine control subjects with established pleural data, we compared the screening performance of FR and SR obtained with a single isoexposure, dual-energy technique (system resolution 0.2 mm, 10 bits). Performance was evaluated for 7320 observations by eight readers using a paired t test (P less than .02 with Bonferroni correction) of averaged receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) areas (Az +/- standard error). We found that SR alone and SR supplemented by dual-energy soft-tissue and calcium images (SRde) were superior to FR in the overall detection of pleural abnormalities (Az = 0.90 +/- 0.01, 0.90 +/- 0.01, and 0.88 +/- 0.01, respectively). In the specific detection of pleural calcification, SRde was superior to FR (Az = 0.91 +/- 0.01 and 0.87 +/- 0.01, respectively; P less than 0.01). Analysis of variance indicated that SRde most closely reproduced an established pleural score based on the International Labor Organization (ILO) classification of the pneumoconioses (P less than 0.05, Scheffé's multiple comparison test). We conclude that isodose SR performs at least as well as FR in screening for asbestos-related pleural disease. SR supplemented by dual-energy images might improve the specific detection of pleural calcifications compared with FR.     

Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs

The effectiveness of a shaped filter in the detection of mediastinal and retrocardiac abnormalities on 140-kVp posteroanterior chest radiographs was measured by observer-performance testing. A set of 100 radiographs (the filtered and nonfiltered radiographs of 50 patients) were randomly selected from 1000 radiographs obtained from 500 outpatients or hospitalized patients. Five observers independently interpreted the set of radiographs, with one observer interpreting the set twice. Observer performance in detecting abnormalities in the mediastinum and the retrocardiac lung were analyzed by using receiver-operating characteristic techniques. The results indicate that the use of a filter has no significant overall diagnostic advantage (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.90 for the filtered radiographs and 0.89 for the unfiltered radiographs). No significant differences were found in the analysis of the various types or locations of lesions in the mediastinum.     

Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures

AIM: To define the value of digital radiography with a clinical flat panel detector system for evaluation of wrist fractures in comparison with state of the art storage phosphor radiography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hard copy images of 26 fractured wrist specimens were acquired with the same exposure dose on a state of the art storage phosphor radiography system and a clinical flat panel detector. Image features like cortical bone surface, trabecular bone, soft tissues and fracture delineation were independently analysed by 4 observers using a standardised protocol. Image quality ratings were evaluated with an analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Flat panel detector radiographs were rated superior with respect to cortical and trabecular bone representation as well as fracture evaluation, while storage phosphor radiographs produced better soft tissue detail. CONCLUSION: In some of the observed image quality aspects, the performance of caesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat panel detector exceeds state of the art storage phosphor radiography. This makes it well suited for skeletal imaging particularly in trauma as seen in the detection of wrist fractures.     

Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.

As part of our continuing evaluation of the clinical applicability of digital radiography, we compared the abilities of radiologists to detect pneumothoraces on conventional chest radiographs with their performances when using three formats of digitally obtained images. Twenty-three frontal-view chest radiographs with pneumothoraces and 22 other chest radiographs, either normal or showing miscellaneous abnormalities, were interpreted by five experienced radiologists in each of four formats: conventional film-screen chest radiographs, small-format (17.8 x 21.6 cm) computed radiographs, large-format (35.6 x 43.1 cm) computed radiographs, and digital images viewed on an interactive electronic workstation. The receiver-operating-characteristic curve areas for each observer for the four types of images were compared by a z test on a critical ratio, and the mean sensitivity and specificity values were compared by the sign rank test. The mean areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves ranged from 0.869 for the digital workstation to 0.915 for film-screen images. The differences observed among formats were not statistically significant. Mean specificities also were not significantly different, ranging from 0.90 for large-format computed radiographs to 0.96 for the digital workstation. Mean sensitivity ranged from 0.65 for the digital workstation to 0.82 for film-screen images. Radiologists interpreting digital workstation images were significantly less sensitive in detecting pneumothoraces than with film-screen and small-format computed images (p = .06). In this study, radiologists detected pneumothoraces equally well on conventional film-screen radiographs and digital images printed on film; however, they detected pneumothoraces less well on electronic viewing consoles. This latter finding reflects an important practical difference in the working behavior of radiologists interacting with a digital workstation.     

胃癌的诊断:普通摄影和DR摄影临床对比

本文介绍应用DR进行胃肠检查，以对比CCD-DR对胃癌的诊断的准确性，并作了ROC曲线分析来评价CCD-DR和CR的不同效果。     

A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a prototype photofluorographic panoramic system with that of a conventional panoramic system. METHODS: We used 14 human skulls with four artificial apical bone defects in each and 13 clinical cases with 21 periapical lesions. Six dental radiologists and six senior dental students rated the presence of defects on each image on a five-point scale. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and the area under each curve (Az) was compared as an index of accuracy. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the photofluorographic and the conventional panoramic systems (P=0.074) in detecting artificial apical defects. However, there were significant differences (P=0.03) in detecting natural defects. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the prototype photofluorographic panoramic system appears comparable with that of the conventional panoramic system. However, variability may arise from the observers' diagnostic experience and training.     

Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography

Performance of a prototype dual-energy digital chest radiography unit in detecting calcified and noncalcified simulated pulmonary nodules was compared with that of a highly optimized, conventional system. Nodules ranging in size (0.5, 1.0, and 1.6 cm), in number (five to 11), and in calcium content (0-25 mg) were superimposed over the lungs of a frozen, unembalmed, human chest phantom. For each technique, six observers examined 50 posteroanterior projections with different randomized nodule locations. Detection consisted of locating and assigning a level of confidence to each perceived nodular opacity. The resulting plots of the true-positive fraction versus the mean number of false-positive calls per projection indicate that for both calcified and noncalcified nodules, the digital unit performed significantly better (P less than .01).     

Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study

Objectives

The diagnosis of caries lesions is still a matter of concern in dentistry. The diagnosis of dental caries by digital radiography has a number of advantages over conventional radiography; however, this method has not been explored fully in the field of paediatric dentistry. This in vitro research evaluated the accuracy of direct digital radiography compared with visual inspection and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars.

Methods

50 molars were selected and evaluated under standardized conditions by 2 previously calibrated examiners according to 3 diagnostic methods (visual inspection, conventional radiography and direct digital radiography). Direct digital radiographs were obtained with the Dixi3 system (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and the conventional radiographs with InSight film (Kodak Eastman Co., Rochester, NY). The images were scored and a reference standard was obtained histologically. The interexaminer reliability was calculated using Cohen''s kappa test and the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of the methods were calculated.

Results

Examiner reliability was good. For lesions limited to the enamel, visual inspection showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than both radiographic methods, but no significant difference was found in specificity. For teeth with dentinal caries, no significant differences were found for any parameter when comparing visual and radiographic evaluation.

Conclusions

Although less accurate than the visual method for detecting caries lesions confined to the enamel, the direct digital radiographic method is as effective as conventional radiographic examination and visual inspection of primary teeth with occlusal caries when the dentine is involved.