Lithium poisoning from a poison control center perspective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the severity of lithium poisoning from a poison control center-based population and the correlation of the Hansen and Amdisen classification with outcome and lithium levels in that setting. All lithium overdoses brought to the attention of the poison control center were prospectively observed during 1 year. Demographic data, amount ingested, coingestants, symptoms and signs, lithium levels, treatment, and outcome were recorded. There were 12 acute lithium overdoses: 5, 5, and 2 with grade 0, 1, and 2, respectively. No patients required hemodialysis or had sequelae or died. There were 174 acute-on-chronic overdoses: 66, 85, 15, and 8 with grade 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Six patients underwent hemodialysis; none had sequelae but one died. There were 19 chronic poisonings: 9, 9, and 1 with grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three patients underwent hemodialysis; one had sequelae and one died. Patients classified as grade 2 had higher lithium levels than those with grade 1 in patients with only lithium poisoning (3.08 +/- 0.77 vs. 2.09 +/- 0.91 mmol/L P = 0.03). The study concluded that morbidity (0.5%) and mortality (1%) associated with lithium poisoning are rarely observed. The Hansen and Amdisen classification does not appear to be a useful clinical tool to predict either morbidity or mortality and does not correlate well with lithium levels.     

The role of the poison center in veterinary poisonings: a survey

The number of veterinary poisonings presented to this poison center has grown to over 1200 cases annually. To make sure that the poison center is working cooperatively with local veterinarians, a survey was sent out to 237 veterinary clinics state-wide. Of particular interest was whether the poison center had a role to play in the treatment of minor poisonings in companion animals. The results of 77 returned surveys indicate that the poison center is currently a major source of poison information and 95% of responders were satisfied with the information received; 73% felt that all minor ingestions should be handled in the home whenever possible, and 70% felt it would be appropriate for poison center staff to perform this function. This survey indicates that the poison center can play a significant role in the treatment of poisonings in small companion animals.     

Acute ethylene chlorohydrin poisoning: experience of a poison control center.

BACKGROUND: Ethylene chlorohydrin (CAS 107-07-3), a chemical once used in hastening grape vine sprouting in Taiwan, has caused severe toxicity upon acute exposure. Although such use of ethylene chlorohydrin is now prohibited in Taiwan, poisoning still occurs following its illegal use. Since data concerning human ethylene chlorohydrin poisoning remain rare, we report our experience in treating acute ethylene chlorohydrin-poisoned patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate patients with ethylene chlorohydrin poisoning reported to Taiwan Poison Control Center during 1985-1998. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with ethylene chlorohydrin poisoning were identified. There were 11 male and 6 female patients, ranging in age from 2 to 70 years (median 53 years). The intent of exposure was suicide in 5, accident in 9, and occupational exposure in 3 patients. Oral ingestion was the most common route of exposure (14 patients). Seven out of the 17 patients died within 24 hours due to metabolic acidosis and respiratory failure. Ethanol therapy, used in 2 patients, had no apparent benefit. Moderate or mild poisoning was characterized by gastrointestinal effects only and an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Ethylene chlorohydrin can result in severe metabolic acidosis, respiratory failure, coma, and death after acute exposure.     

Multifunctional drugs as novel antidotes for organophosphates' poisoning

Some organophosphorus compounds (OPs) are nerve agents that continue to concern military personnel and civilians as potential battlefield and terrorist threats. Additionally, OPs are used in agriculture where they are associated with numerous cases of intentional and accidental misuse. These toxicants induce an array of deleterious effects including respiratory distress, convulsions and ultimately death. A mechanism involving a rapid and potent inhibition of peripheral and central cholinesterases leading to a massive buildup of acetylcholine in synaptic clefts was suggested as the underlying trigger of the toxic events. Indeed, therapy comprised of an acetylcholinesterase reactivator (i.e., oxime) and a cholinergic antagonist (e.g., atropine) is the accepted major paradigm for protection. This approach yields a remarkable survival rate but fails to prevent neurological and behavioral deficits. Extensive research revealed a complex picture consisting of an early activation of several neurotransmitter systems, in which the glutamatergic plays a pivotal role., Data accumulated in recent years support the concept that multi-targeting of pathways including glutamatergic and cholinergic circuits is required for an effective treatment. Drugs that demonstrate the ability to interact with several systems (e.g., caramiphen) were found to afford a superior protection against OPs as compared to specific antimuscarinic ligands (e.g., scopolamine). Compounds that potently block muscarinic receptors, interact with the NMDA ion channel and in addition are able to modulate σ(1) sites and/or GABAergic transmission seem to represent the emerging backbone for novel antidotes against OP poisoning. Several multifunctional drugs are already used for complex diseases e.g., cancer and depression.     

The impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay for patients with poisoning

While previous research suggests that poison control centers (PCCs) significantly reduce the number of emergency room visits and resultant health care costs for poisonings, little is known regarding the potential impact of the PCC on the length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to examine whether assistance from a PCC is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay for patients admitted with poisonings. The cases reported to our PCC were matched over a period of 1 yr with the hospital admissions E-coded as poisonings in the Uniform Billing (UB) data maintained by the state health department. The length of hospital stay was then compared between the cases for which a PCC provided assistance (matches) and the cases for which a PCC was not contacted. During the study period, there were 32,245 hospitalizations for poisoning in the UB data and 52,498 poisonings reported to the PCC. The matching process yielded 1719 nonfatal cases. The length of hospital stay for patients who received assistance from a PCC ranged from 0 to 126 d (median = 2.0) and was significantly different compared to a range of 0 to 220 days (median = 5.0) for cases that were never called in to a PCC. The results of this study suggest that patients admitted to hospitals with poisonings who receive PCC assistance have measurable reductions in average hospital stay. Such a decrease may translate into substantial savings in health care costs and resources.     

The essential role of a poison center in handling an outbreak of barium carbonate poisoning

Acute barium salt poisoning may cause acute hypokalemia and result in respiratory paralysis and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The early nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms of barium poisoning due to food contamination could be confused with other benign food poisonings. Early diagnosis and initiation of intensive supportive care is essential. We report an outbreak of acute barium carbonate poisoning, occurring at a family reunion party, which resulted in 9 hospital admissions. All of the victims initially developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal colic, dizziness and watery diarrhea followed by numbness of the face and distal extremities 1-2 h after ingesting fried flour-coated sweet potatoes. The flour was later confirmed to be contaminated with barium carbonate. One person died in the emergency room with a serum potassium level of 0.8 mEq/L. Two other victims developed ventricular tachycardia and respiratory paralysis but completely recovered with the treatment advice provided by the poison center. The poison center was successful in helping to make the correct diagnosis in a timely manner, immediately distribute the treatment protocol, and coordinate the laboratory confirmation of barium carbonate poisoning.     

New developments in therapeutic chelating agents as antidotes for metal poisoning

An examination of the studies on therapeutic chelating agents that have been carried out during the last decade reveals that extensive efforts have been made to develop compounds superior to those previously available for the treatment of acute and chronic intoxication by many metals. These metals include primarily iron, plutonium, cadmium, lead, and arsenic, but also many other elements for which acute and chronic intoxication is less common. These studies have revealed the importance of several additional factors of importance in the design of such compounds and have led to many new compounds of considerable clinical promise. An additional development has been the introduction of previously developed chelating agents for use with certain metals on a broader scale.     

The need for translational research on antidotes for pesticide poisoning

1. Pesticide poisoning kills hundreds of thousands of people in the Asia-Pacific region each year. The majority of deaths are from deliberate self-poisoning with organophosphorus pesticides (OP), aluminium phosphide and paraquat. The current response from a public health, medical and research perspective is inadequate. 2. There are few proven or effective treatments; in addition, very little clinical research has been performed to transfer antidotes shown to work in animal studies into clinical practice. 3. The human toxicity of pesticides is poorly studied and better information may inform a more sustained and appropriate regulatory response. Further understanding may also lead to improvements in diagnosis and treatment. 4. The few effective treatments are not being recommended or delivered in an optimal and timely fashion to poisoned patients. A regional approach to facilitate appropriate pricing, packaging and delivery of antidotes is required.     

Toxicology cart for stocking sufficient supplies of poisoning antidotes.

Within a three-month period, the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNMHSC) encountered three toxicological emergencies in which antidotes were either unavailable or inadequately stocked. Patient A was a patient with ethylene glycol intoxication. The emergency department (ED) physician ordered a 10% ethanol infusion. The pharmacy staff was unable to locate the commercially available solution and had to compound the infusion, resulting in a delay in administration of the antidote. Patient B was a patient at an outside hospital with organophosphate exposure whose transfer to our ED was requested by the other hospital. The pharmacy staff was unable to locate the pralidoxime needed to treat this patient; therefore; the patient was not transferred. It was later discovered that the pralidoxime had been stored in a location inconsistent with the storage policy for this medication. Patient C was a patient with severe rattlesnake envenomation. The pharmacy staff could locate only half of the antivenin needed to treat this patient. In each of these three cases, it was necessary to compound the required medication or to obtain it from other local facilities. These cases underscore the need for pharmacies to stock adequate amounts of poisoning antidotes in one immediately accessible location. A similar problem with understocking of poisoning antidotes exists throughout the United States.     

A poison information service for small animals offered by a regional poison center

Since 1985 the Hennepin Regional Poison Center has provided the same quality service to veterinarians and pet owners that parents of small children, physicians and other health care providers have enjoyed for many years. To facilitate this service, the poison center has expanded its data base to include information on small animal poisonings and has periodically mailed newsletters state-wide to veterinarians. In addition, the poison center began to routinely assist per owners in the home treatment of minor ingestions in dogs, and enlisted the aid of a veterinary toxicologist who is on-call for consultation. Prior to 1985, animal-related exposures totaled 1,092 cases, which comprised 3.9% of the center's total annual cell volume. As a result of the above efforts, calls from veterinarians and pet owners increased to approximately 2,000 cases annually for the period 1986-88 (average 6.3%). Recently, the poison center received the financial support of the Minnesota State Veterinary Association for the printing of telephone stickers promoting a line exclusively for pet calls (337-PETS). This Pet Poison Information Service appears well received, resulting in an additional 58% increase in pet-related calls. During 1990 this center consulted on over 3,500 exposures in companion animals. Based on our experience, veterinarians and pet owners appear to have been relatively neglected by poison centers. Poison centers may play an important role in the treatment of poisonings in pets.     

Seasonal changes in poisoning exposures reported to a regional poison center from coastal resort areas

This study examined the role of seasonality in the reporting of poisoning exposures from geographically distinct regions, specifically from coastal resort and vacation areas. The monthly distribution of calls received by a regional poison control center from counties with popular beach and vacation resorts was compared with the monthly distribution of the overall calls to the center. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to determine if there was a significant difference between the monthly distribution of calls received from the resort counties and the overall calls received by the poison center. Further, exposure and information calls from the resort counties were separately examined to determine if they were equally distributed between months. The monthly distribution of calls received from coastal resort counties was significantly different from the monthly distribution of overall calls received by the center. Significantly more calls were received from the resort counties during the months of July and August at the height of the vacation season. While there was no seasonal variation in the number of information calls from these counties, the poisoning exposure calls were not equally distributed between months, as there were more such calls during the months of July and August. Seasonality appears to play a role in the number of calls received by a regional poison center from coastal areas with popular beach resorts. Poisoning exposure calls seem to increase particularly during the months of July and August. A greater effort may have to be put into activities related to poison control and prevention into such areas during the vacation season.     

Comparison of nitrite treatment and stroma-free methemoglobin solution as antidotes for cyanide poisoning in a rat model

The standard nitrite/thiosulfate regimen for cyanide poisoning was tested in our rat model. By modifying the treatment regimen and the nitrite solution an effective antidote against an LD90 of cyanide could be produced. However, this treatment was effective against two times the LD90 only when administered ten minutes prior to cyanide injection. These results are in marked contrast to our results with stroma-free methemoglobin solutions (SFMS) which showed SFMS to be a highly effective antidote against four times the LD90 when administered 30 seconds after an intravenous injection of cyanide. SFMS proved to be an effective antidote for two times the LD90 when administered up to sixty seconds after the cessation of respiration.     

Evaluation of a computerized program (ARSENIC) as an aid for telephone consultations in a poison center.

ARSENIC is a computerized system providing assistance for telephone consultation in poison centers. Its main characteristic is to blend the document consultation process with the case-recording procedure. It has been used in the daily routine of our poison center since 1987. To evaluate this system, 2 weeks were randomly chosen. During one, ARSENIC was used by the telephone responders; during the other week, traditional paper documents and files were used. Document search times, coding times and quality of responders were recorded by a blinded observer and analysed in total and on the basis of the training of the telephone officer (medical student, resident or toxicologist). ARSENIC decreased the document search times (3.1 +/- 2.7 min vs 3.8 +/- 2.9 min; p less than 0.05) and did not increase coding time (2.1 +/- 1.2 min vs 2.2 +/- 1.4 min; NS). For each group of telephone responders, answer quality increased with ARSENIC. More important, the answer quality of less-trained officers using ARSENIC was similar to that of trained toxicologists without ARSENIC. The quality assurance given by ARSENIC was, for us, the most important argument for computer use at telephone desks.     

The effect of poison control center consultation on accidental poisoning inpatient hospitalizations with preexisting medical conditions

In 2005, the Kentucky Poison Control Center (PCC) recorded 46,625 poisoning calls; 27% received hospital treatment. Probabilistic data linkage of accidental poisoning inpatient hospital (IPH) discharge data and PCC data (years 2000-2004) was performed. This study compared IPH with/without preexisting medical conditions and IPH with/without PCC consultation, examining total length of stay and total hospitalization charges. When compared to the IPH reference group with no preexisting medical conditions and who did not consult the PCC (mean charges = $8748, mean length of stay = 3.2 d), PCC consultation without a preexisting medical condition was significantly associated with decreased total hospitalization charges and decreased length of stay (mean charges = $4999, mean length of stay = 1.9 d). When the patient had a preexisting medical condition, PCC consultation was still associated with decreased total hospitalization charges and length of stay (mean charges = $8145, mean length of stay = 2.4 d) compared to those patients with a preexisting medical condition who did not consult the PCC (mean charges = $10,607, mean length of stay = 3.6 d). These results suggest that after accounting for a patient's age and gender, consultation with the PCC is significantly associated with reduced total hospitalization charges and reduced length of stay for IPH, and this association holds for patients with and without a preexisting medical condition.     

Age-specific and age-adjusted penetrance as poison center outcome measures

BACKGROUND: The American Association of Poison Control Centers defines penetrance as the number of exposures per 1000 residents of a population during one year. This metric fails to account for confounding by age group variability. We demonstrate the error caused by using raw penetrance and present two alternate methods of calculation, age-specific penetrance and age-adjusted penetrance. METHODS: Data from the toxic exposure surveillance system were collected from calls to our 41 county regional poison centers in 1998. Age-specific penetrance (ASP) was calculated by dividing the number of exposures (E) in age interval "i" in county "A" by 1000 population in age interval "Pi" in county "A" or ASP = Ei/Pi. AAP is the summation of the weighted age-specific penetrance. Weights (w(si)) represent the relative age distribution of a standard population, in this case the 1998 US population. AAP = sigma(i) w(si) * Ei/Pi. RESULTS: [table: see text] County C has low raw penetrance and is known to have relatively fewer toddlers and presumably a lower incidence of poisoning. This demonstrates that raw penetrance misrepresents populations with small proportions of children and should not be used to compare promotion or prevention activities between populations. CONCLUSION: We recommend poison centers and the American Association of Poison Control Centers replace raw penetrance with age-adjusted penetrance as one measure of the effectiveness of a poison center's awareness efforts.     

Personnel requirements of a poison information center

Time use by poison information specialists at a poison information center was assessed to determine personnel requirements. To justify the current staff complement, to develop a formula for calculating future needs, and to monitor staff use, a time-use study was conducted by professional management engineers over 8 days in a 24-day period. Equal time was spent during each of three work shifts (0700-1500, 1500-2300, 2300-0700). Of 11 poison information specialists, 9 worked during the study period. Activity was divided into direct (handling poison information calls) and indirect (follow-up calls, quality assurance, continuing education, etc.) categories. Time study calculations for direct activity were based on 324 actual exposure calls. The average time to receive and document an initial poison exposure call was 8.7 minutes (range, 6.6-11.1 minutes). Indirect activity related to those calls averaged 12.9 minutes (range, 5.8-20.7 minutes), for a total of 21.6 minutes per call (87.3% of an eight-hour work shift). Nonproductive activity accounted for 12.7% of the time. Based on a mean (+/- S.D.) daily exposure volume of 104.7 +/- 1.35 calls, it was determined that 5.4 full-time equivalents per day were necessary to respond to an average day's call volume. At this center, the workload management study provided a sound basis for assessing current staffing needs and for justifying future changes in staffing based on actual call volume.     

Evaluation of poison information services provided by a new poison information center

Aim:

The aim of this study is to assess the nature and quality of services provided by poison information center established at a tertiary-care teaching hospital, Mysore.

Settings and Design:

This was a prospective observational study.

Materials and Methods:

The poison information center was officially established in September 2010 and began its functioning thereafter. The center is equipped with required resources and facility (e.g., text books, Poisindex, Drugdex, toll free telephone service, internet and online services) to provide poison information services. The poison information services provided by the center were recorded in documentation forms. The documentation form consists of numerous sections to collect information on: (a) Type of population (children, adult, elderly or pregnant) (b) poisoning agents (c) route of exposure (d) type of poisoning (intentional, accidental or environmental) (e) demographic details of patient (age, gender and bodyweight) (f) enquirer details (background, place of call and mode of request) (g) category and purpose of query and (h) details of provided service (information provided, mode of provision, time taken to provide information and references consulted). The nature and quality of poison information services provided was assessed using a quality assessment checklist developed in accordance with DSE/World Health Organization guidelines.

Statistical Analysis:

Chi-Square test (χ²).

Results:

A total of 419 queries were received by the center. A majority (n = 333; 79.5%) of the queries were asked by the doctors to provide optimal care (n = 400; 95.5%). Most of the queries were received during ward rounds (n = 201; 48.0%), followed by direct access (n = 147; 35.1%). The poison information services were predominantly provided through verbal communication (n = 352; 84.0%). Upon receipt of queries, the required service was provided immediately (n = 103; 24.6%) or within 10-20 min (n = 296; 70.6%). The queries were mainly related to intentional poisoning (n = 258; 64.5%), followed by accidental poisoning (n = 142; 35.5%). The most common poisoning agents were medicines (n = 124; 31.0%). The service provided was graded as “Excellent” for the majority of queries (n = 360; 86%; P < 0.001), followed by “Very Good” (n = 50; 12%) and “Good” (n = 9; 2%).

Conclusion:

The poison information center provided requested services in a skillful, efficient and evidence-based manner to meet the needs of the requestor. The enquiries and information provided is documented in a clear and systematic manner.KEY WORDS: Evaluation, poison information center, poison information services, quality