Prognosis of pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis according to the type of treatment: A population-based study in Korea by the SMARTSHIP group

BackgroundsIn this study, we evaluated the incidence and outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer was diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Additionally, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who became pregnant after breast cancer, according to the treatment.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women aged 20–45 years who were surgically treated for breast cancer between 2004 and 2014 using the Korean National Health Insurance database. The patients were classified into six groups according to the treatment. Propensity score matching was applied to the cohort to analyze the risk of breast cancer-associated mortality after pregnancy and childbirth.ResultsOf the 45,765 patients who had been newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 1826 (4%) became pregnant after breast cancer diagnosis. Among the pregnant group, the HR of the risk of death was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.36) for patients who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis. In patients who received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, the pregnant group had better prognosis than the non-pregnant group. There was no significant difference between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group in patients who received chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without endocrine therapy.ConclusionThe risk of death was low in women who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis of breast cancer. The prognosis of pregnant women was non-inferior to that of non-pregnant women, even in women who received trastuzumab. These findings provide reassurance to patients with HER2-positive cancer who are considering future pregnancy.     

Pregnancy and Breast Cancer: when They Collide

Women of childbearing age experience an increased breast cancer risk associated with a completed pregnancy. For younger women, this increase in breast cancer risk is transient and within a decade after parturition a cross over effect results in an ultimate protective benefit. The post-partum peak of increased risk is greater in women with advanced maternal age. Further, their lifetime risk for developing breast cancer remains elevated for many years, with the cross over to protection occurring decades later or not at all. Breast cancers diagnosed during pregnancy and within a number of years post-partum are termed pregnancy-associated or PABC. Contrary to popular belief, PABC is not a rare disease and could affect up to 40,000 women in 2009. The collision between pregnancy and breast cancer puts women in a fear-invoking paradox of their own health, their pregnancy, and the outcomes for both. We propose two distinct subtypes of PABC: breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and breast cancer diagnosed post-partum. This distinction is important because emerging epidemiologic data highlights worsened outcomes specific to post-partum cases. We reported that post-partum breast involution may be responsible for the increased metastatic potential of post-partum PABC. Increased awareness and detection, rationally aggressive treatment, and enhanced understanding of the mechanisms are imperative steps toward improving the prognosis for PABC. If we determine the mechanisms by which involution promotes metastasis of PABC, the post-partum period can be a window of opportunity for intervention strategies.     

Is Pregnancy After Breast Cancer Safe?

Abstract: The impact of treatment on subsequent fertility and the safety of childbearing are major complicating factors for young women diagnosed with breast cancer. As national data indicate women are postponing first pregnancy to older ages; therefore, many young patients are seeking clinical guidance regarding the safety of conception and treatment options that may not prevent subsequent pregnancy. Newly developed chemotherapy protocols of brief duration have improved life expectancy enabling some women to consider childbearing. This study was conducted to compare prognosis among breast cancer patients with and without a subsequent pregnancy. Medical record review of female members of a Northern California prepaid health care plan enabled the identification of 107 women with one or more subsequent pregnancies and 344 cases without a pregnancy, who were diagnosed between 1968 and 1995. Sets were matched on age, year and stage at diagnosis, months of survival and recurrence status at conception. Among the matched sets, neither risk of recurrence nor death differed significantly by subsequent pregnancy history during an average 12 years of follow‐up (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] recurrence: 1.2 [0.8, 2.0]; adjusted HR death: 1.0 [0.6, 1.9]). Women interested in preserving their fertility and considering pregnancy are a self‐selected population; therefore, to reduce potential bias, cases were matched on recurrence status at time of conception. Although the number of cases was limited, subgroup analyzes indicated a small, nonsignificant adverse effect among women who conceived within 12 months of diagnosis. This analysis of carefully matched cases provides reassurance that long‐term prognosis was not adversely affected by subsequent pregnancy.     

Pregnancy‐associated breast cancer in a contemporary cohort of newly diagnosed women

Pregnancy‐associated breast cancer (PABC) refers to breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during pregnancy, lactation, or in the postpartum period. There is evidence that PABC is associated with a poorer prognosis, and that the development of the disease is influenced by the unique hormonal milieu of pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics associated with PABC in a contemporary cohort of women with newly diagnosed BC. Our institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for women diagnosed with BC between 2009‐2018 who had at least one full‐term pregnancy (FTP). Variables of interest included patient demographics and clinical and tumor characteristics. PABC was defined as breast cancer diagnosed within 24 months of delivery. Statistical analyses included Pearson's chi‐square and logistic regression. Out of a total of 2202 women, 46 (2.1%) had PABC. Median follow‐up in the total cohort was 5.5 years. After adjusting for age at first FTP, PABC was associated with younger age at diagnosis, older age at first FTP, non‐Caucasian race, BRCA positivity, presentation with a palpable mass, higher pathologic stage, higher histologic grade, and ER‐negative and triple‐negative receptor status. The association of PABC with non‐Caucasian race may be reflected in the increased proportion of triple‐negative breast cancers in the PABC group. PABC was also associated with older age at first FTP. As more women delay childbearing, risk for PABC may increase. Our findings suggest that women who become pregnant at older ages should be followed carefully during pregnancy and the postpartum period, especially if they are BRCA mutation carriers. The optimal approach for monitoring older women during pregnancy and the postpartum period is unclear.     

Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer concurrent with pregnancy.

The management of PABC is very difficult. The incidence of PABC is low, but may be increasing because of the number of women who are becoming pregnant at a later age. More investigation is needed to understand whether the biology of PABC is different from that of breast cancer in nonpregnant women. One exciting area of further research is the potential relationship between mutations in known breast cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer development during pregnancy. Diagnosis or PABC remains challenging because of the anatomic and physiologic changes that occur in the breast during pregnancy. Understanding the generic influences on PABC may help physicians in diagnosing this disease earlier, and understanding the tumor-receptor characteristics of PABC can help physicians deliver effective treatment. The various modalities available for treatment of PABC and their risks and benefits must be discussed openly with patients and their families. Abortion is not usually recommended. Modified radical mastectomy is the recommended treatment for PABC diagnosed during the first trimester. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be given with minimal risks to the fetus during the second or third trimester. Radiation therapy is contraindicated during pregnancy because of the potential for injury to the fetus. Breast conservation therapy, with radiation treatments given after delivery or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, is an option for women with PABC diagnosed late in pregnancy. Once the appropriate treatment modality is chosen, its implementation must not be delayed because of the pregnancy. Most of the literature shows that women with PABC have the same survival stage for stage as nonpregnant women with breast cancer. But some studies suggest that the prognosis is worse for patients who present with advanced-stage PABC. Finally, recurrence and survival in most patients previously treated for breast cancer do not appear to be adversely affected by subsequent pregnancy. Above all, the patient with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is best served by early and continued involvement of a multidisciplinary cancer treatment team.     

Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer in young women does not adversely affect the prognosis

We assessed whether pregnancy after breast cancer in patients younger than 36 years of age affects the prognosis. Of 115 women with breast cancer followed for a mean of 6 years, 18 became pregnant (median time between diagnosis and the first pregnancy 44.5 months). Voluntary interruption of pregnancy was decided by 8 (44.4%) women. Significant differences in prognostic factors between pregnant and non-pregnant women were not observed. Pregnant women showed a lower frequency of positive estrogen receptors (41%) than non-pregnant (64%) (P=0.06). At 5 years of follow-up, 100% of women in the pregnant group and 80% in the non-pregnant group were alive. The percentages of disease-free women were 94% and 64%, respectively (P=0.009). Breast cancer patients presented a high number of unwanted pregnancies. Pregnancy after breast cancer not only did not adversely affect prognosis of the neoplasm but also may have a protective effect.     

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study from Taegu, Korea

Abstract: A hospital-based case-control study was carried out to identify reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in Taegu, Korea. Four hundred and eighty-one breast cancer patients and 491 age-matched control patients examined between 1988 and 1994 were included in this study. Eleven reproductive risk factors were selected for comparison using cross tabulation and chi-square method, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the odds ratios for the risk of breast cancer. The mean age of the breast cancer patients in this study was 47.5 years. Analyses demonstrated that nulliparous women had a higher risk for breast cancer (odds ratio 3.46, p = 0.03) than women with one to four live births, and women who had an abortion during their first pregnancy had a slightly increased risk (odds ratio 1.86, p < 0.01) than women who had normal deliveries, but the age at menarche and menopause did not have any influence on the risk of developing breast cancer. Although there were similarities in risk factors between Western women and women in this study, such as a higher risk for nulliparous women, two key factors were found to contrast with those of Western women. First, the mean age of breast cancer patients in this study was only 47.5 years. Second, the age of menarche and menopause of these women did not have any influence on the risk of breast cancer.     

Pregnancy-Induced Changes in Breast Cancer Risk

Breast cancer is the malignant disease most frequently diagnosed in women of all races and nationalities. Since the 1970s the worldwide incidence of this disease has increased 30–40% in postmenopausal women, in whom, paradoxically, the risk of developing breast cancer is significantly reduced by an early first full term pregnancy (FTP) as compared to nulliparous and late parous women. Although the cause of breast cancer is not known, the mechanisms mediating the protection conferred by an early FTP have been identified to reside in the breast itself, and to be modulated by endogenous and environmental exposures that might negatively affect this organ during specific windows in its development that extend from prenatal life until the first pregnancy. Soon after conception the embryo initiates the production of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), the glycoprotein hormone that is diagnostic of pregnancy. HCG in conjunction with ovarian steroid hormones primes the hypothalamic neuroendocrine system for maintaining the pregnancy. Higher levels of hCG during the first trimester of pregnancy have been associated with a reduction in maternal breast cancer incidence after age 50. In preclinical studies it has been demonstrated that both FTP and hCG treatment of virgin rats prevent the development of chemically-induced mammary tumors, a phenomenon mediated by the differentiation of the mammary gland epithelial cells prior to carcinogen exposure. Complete differentiation proceeds through complex morphological, physiological and molecular changes that occur during pregnancy and lactation, that ultimately result in increased DNA repair capabilities of the mammary epithelium, activation of genes controlling differentiation and programmed cell death and imprinting in the breast epithelium a specific and permanent genomic signature of pregnancy. This signature is indicative of a reduced breast cancer risk and serves as a molecular biomarker of differentiation for evaluating the potential use of chemopreventive agents.     

Position Paper of the American Council on Science and Health on Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: Established, Speculated, and Unsupported

Abstract: This article provides the position of the American Council on Science and Health regarding how breast cancer is defined and classified; the magnitude of the public health problem of breast cancer among women; the implications of variation in incidence of breast cancer internationally and with migration; access to health care as a factor in slight differences in incidence and mortality rates among African-American and white women; and the evidence concerning various proposed human-breast-cancer risk factors. The article classifies risk factors as either established, speculated, or unsupported on the basis of available evidence. Specific genes have been identified that may explain as much as 5–10% of new breast cancer cases. Inherited predispositions may be characterized by family history of breast or ovarian cancer, young age at diagnosis, breast cancer diagnosed in both breasts, and male breast cancer. Benign breast disease (BBD), particularly the subtypes of BBD involving atypical hyperplasia, and exposure early in life to ionizing radiation is an established risk factor for breast cancer. Several reproductive characteristics are established as risk factors for breast cancer: early age at menarche, first full-term pregnancy after age 35 years of late age, and late age of menopause. Obesity and low physical activity are established as risk factors for breast cancer and are modifiable. Speculated risk factors for breast cancer that are gaining scientific support include nulliparity, oral contraceptive use, and postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy. Speculated risk factors for which there is conflicting or preliminary support include not breast feeding, postmenopausal estrogen/progestogen replacement therapy, prescribed diethylstilbestrol, low consumption of phytoestrogens, specific dietary practices, alcohol consumption, not using nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs, abortion, and breast augmentation. Unsupported risk factors include higher than average consumption of phytoestrogens, premenopausal obesity, electromagnetic fields, and low-dose ionizing radiation after 40 years of age. There is only limited support for xenoestrogens and large breast size as risk factors for breast cancer.     

Prognostic significance of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer

Women previously treated for primary operable breast cancer are at increased risk of developing cancer in the contralateral breast, but the clinical significance of this development is unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of synchronous bilateral breast cancer or the development of a metachronous contralateral breast primary on the prognosis. In a series of 3210 women age < or = 70 years treated between 1975 and 1995 for primary operable breast cancer, 106 were identified to have bilateral breast cancer. Of these women, 26 were noted to have synchronous bilateral breast primaries (0.8%), and 80 developed a contralateral breast cancer after treatment for an initial primary breast cancer. Using life-tables analysis, there was a significant difference in survival between women with unilateral breast cancer, those with synchronous bilateral breast cancers, and those with metachronous contralateral breast with survivals at 16 years of 53.8%, 42.4%, and 60.1%, respectively (p < 0.0001), from the date of the diagnosis of the first primary tumor. There was no difference in survival seen between the three groups when survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis of the second primary in cases of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (p = 0.31). When contralateral breast cancer was incorporated as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox multivariate model together with the three factors used to determine the Nottingham Prognostic Index (invasive tumor size, grade, and lymph node stage), contralateral breast cancer continued to be a significant prognostic determinant (p = 0.02). The survival of women with synchronous bilateral breast cancer or metachronous breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of the original primary was worse than those with unilateral disease. However, the time duration to metachronous contralateral breast cancer did not have prognostic significance in a multivariate model compared with the prognostic features of the original primary.     

Strategies for fertility preservation in young early breast cancer patients

Diagnosis of breast cancer in young women poses a threat to fertility. Due to a recent trend of delaying pregnancy, an increasing number of breast cancer patients in reproductive age wish to bear children. Health care providers have the responsibility to know how to manage fertility issues in cancer survivors. Oncofertility counseling is of great importance to many young women diagnosed with cancer and should be managed in a multi-disciplinary background. Most of young breast cancer patients are candidate to receive chemotherapy, which could lead to premature ovarian failure. A baseline evaluation of ovarian reserve may help in considering the different fertility preservation options. The choice of the suitable strategy depends also on age, type of chemotherapy, partner status and patients' motivation. Various options are available, some established such as embryo and oocyte cryopreservation, some still experimental such as ovarian tissue cryopreservation and ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy. An early referral to a reproductive specialist should be offered to patients at risk of infertility who are interested in fertility preservation.     

Breastfeeding and prognostic markers in breast cancer

Background

Several studies suggest that total breastfeeding time reduces breast cancer risk. The underlying mechanisms are unclear. Whether breastfeeding also affects the prognosis is not yet investigated. A number of tumour characteristics, i.e. histological type of cancer, grade, tumour size, Nottingham prognostic index, vascular invasion and DNA-ploidy, have been demonstrated to be of prognostic value.

Methods

We have searched for a possible link between these prognostic markers and breastfeeding time, age at first child and number of children. 250 women treated for breast cancer have answered a questionnaire.

Results

No significant interactions were found possibly with one exception, LVI vs. age at first child. We found, significant correlations between lobular cancer, and thereby also DNA-ploidy, and age at first childbirth.

Conclusions

We have found that lobular cancer (and thereby also diploid tumours) are connected, independently, to age at first childbirth and possibly also to number of children but no other correlations between reproductive data, breastfeeding included, and prognostic markers used in this study were found.     

Incidence and prognosis in early onset breast cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognosis in early onset breast cancer. Age-adjusted incidence and death rate for the 5394 Swedish women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 40 between 1960 and 1996 was studied using data from the Swedish Cancer Registry and Swedish Death Cause Registry. A total of 107 consecutive young patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing surgery during 1980-1993 in the Southeast Swedish health care region were retrospectively followed up and their cancers reviewed and graded blindly. The median follow-up time was 11.2 years. The applicability of the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) as a prognostic tool was investigated. Grade, age, node status, tumour size, S-phase fraction and steroid receptor content were related to survival univariately and multivariately in a Cox proportional hazard analysis. The incidence of early onset breast cancer has increased moderately and the survival rate has not improved during the last 35 years. When young women are diagnosed with breast cancer their tumours are larger, their lymph nodes more often involved, and the median grade higher than in older with 64% having grade 3 tumours. Lymph node status was the strongest sole prognostic indicator but the use of NPI gave more accurate prognostic information than node status alone.     

Fertility and adjuvant treatment in young women with breast cancer

Women of childbearing age with breast cancer are often concerned about whether they will become infertile after treatment, and for those who wish to bear children, whether a subsequent pregnancy will alter their risk of disease recurrence. The risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA), menopause, and infertility appear to be related to patient age and type of treatment received, though data regarding actual fertility following treatment are limited. There are options available for fertility preservation for young women who wish to have a biologic child after breast cancer and are at risk for infertility. Options include cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes, ovarian tissue prior to treatment, and ovarian suppression through chemotherapy. However, most of these are considered experimental, and there are limited data regarding the safety of such strategies. There has been concern that pregnancy after breast cancer may worsen prognosis in light of the endocrine manipulations used to treat breast cancer, particularly for women with hormone sensitive disease. Several studies addressing the potential risk of pregnancy after breast cancer have not revealed any negative effect on prognosis. However, these studies have significant limitations, and concerns about a negative impact for some remain. Ongoing and future prospective studies evaluating fertility and pregnancy issues for young breast cancer survivors are warranted for this vulnerable population facing this difficult issue.     

Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review

HYPOTHESIS: Breast cancer in pregnancy will increase as more women postpone childbearing until later in life. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Articles were obtained from MEDLINE (1966-present) using the keywords breast, cancer, carcinoma, and pregnancy. Additional articles were sought using the references of those obtained. A total of 171 articles were found, 125 in English. More than 100 were reviewed, including 7 prospective and 40 retrospective studies, 6 case reports, and at least 47 review articles on various aspects of pregnancy and cancer. Data extraction was performed by 1 reviewer. RESULTS: Diagnostic delays are shorter than in the past but remain common. Mammography has a high false-negative rate during pregnancy. Biopsy or needle aspiration are needed for diagnosis and cannot be postponed until after delivery. Pregnancy-associated cancers tend to occur at a later stage and be estrogen receptor-negative. However, they carry a similar prognosis to other breast cancers when matched for stage and age. Although modified radical mastectomy is the traditional treatment, breast-conserving therapy is increasingly common. Therapeutic radiation is contraindicated, but chemotherapy is relatively safe after the first trimester. Tamoxifen should be avoided in the first trimester and possibly beyond. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should perform a thorough breast examination at the first prenatal visit and maintain a high index of suspicion for cancer. Patients who wish to continue their pregnancies have a growing array of treatment options.     

Factors related to incomplete treatment of breast cancer in Kumasi,Ghana

PurposeThe burden of cancer in Africa is an enlarging public health challenge. Breast cancer in Ghana is the second most common cancer among Ghanaian women and the proportion of diagnosed patients who complete prescribed treatment is estimated to be very limited, thereby potentially adding to lower survival and poor quality of life after diagnosis. The objective of this study was to identify the patient and system factors related to incomplete treatment of breast cancer among patients.MethodsThis study was conducted at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. We interviewed 117 breast cancer patients and next of kin of breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2010.ResultsIslamic religion, seeking treatment with traditional healers, and lack of awareness about national health insurance coverage of breast cancer treatment were predictors of incomplete treatment.ConclusionsThe results of this study support that Ghanaian women with diagnosed breast cancer have multiple addressable and modifiable patient factors that may deter them from completing the prescribed treatment. The results highlight the need for developing and testing specific interventions about the importance of completing treatment with a special focus on addressing religious, cultural, and system navigation barriers in developing countries.     

A review of the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement techniques

The objective of this narrative review is to study the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement techniques with quantitative data carried out during pregnancy and after childbirth. A literature search in MEDLINE and relevant and up-to-date journals from 1960 until April 2017 was performed for articles dealing with the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement methods. Only studies describing objective measurement techniques. i.e., urodynamics, ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, and neurophysiologic tests carried out throughout pregnancy and after childbirth are included. Relevant studies presenting objective quantitative data are analyzed and briefly summarized. The number of studies meeting selection criteria was relatively few. Pregnancy, especially first pregnancy, is associated bladder neck lowering, increased bladder neck mobility, pelvic organ descent, decreased levator ani strength, and decreased urethral resistance. These changes are accentuated after vaginal delivery. Data on the impact of obstetrical and neonatal variables are transient and seem of less importance. Cesarean delivery is not completely protective. In most women, pelvic floor muscle function recovers in the year after delivery. Objective measurement techniques during pregnancy may allow identification of women susceptible to pelvic floor dysfunction later in life and offer the opportunity for counseling and preventive treatment strategies.     

Immediate breast reconstruction with expander in pregnant breast cancer patients

BackgroundBreast reconstruction after mastectomy is currently considered an essential component in managing breast cancer patients, particularly those diagnosed at a young age. However, no studies have been published on the feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction in patients diagnosed and operated during the course of gestation.MethodWe retrospectively identified all breast cancer patients who were subjected to mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction during pregnancy at the European Institute of Oncology between 2002 and 2012. Patient demographics, gestational age at surgery, tumor stage, adjuvant treatment, details of the surgical procedures, surgical outcomes and fetal outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 78 patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy were subjected to a surgical procedure during the course of gestation. Twenty-two patients had mastectomy; of whom 13 were subjected to immediate breast reconstruction. Twelve out of 13 patients had a two-stage procedure with tissue expander insertion. Median gestational age at surgery was 16 weeks. No major surgical complications were encountered. Only one patient elected to have an abortion, otherwise, no spontaneous abortions or pregnancy complications were reported. Median gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks (range: 32–40 weeks). No major congenital malformations were reported. At a median follow-up of 32 months, all patients are alive with no long-term surgical complications.ConclusionsThis is the first study of immediate breast reconstruction in pregnant breast cancer patients. Tissue expander insertion appears to ensure a short operative time, and does not seem to be associated with considerable morbidity to the patient or the fetus. Hence, it could be considered in the multidisciplinary management of women diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy.     

Propensity score to evaluate prognosis in pregnancy-associated breast cancer: Analysis from a French cancer network

PurposeTo compare the prognosis of pregnancy associated breast cancer occurring during pregnancy (BCP) to non-pregnancy associated breast cancers (non-BCP) in young women managed at a national expert center.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospective database using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with known prognostic factors.ResultsWe analyzed data of 49 patients with BCP and 104 with non-BCP diagnosed between 2002 and 2017 at Tenon University Hospital (Paris, France). The BCP tumors were often locally advanced (lymph node metastases in 59%), of high grade (55%) and highly proliferative (67% with Ki67 ≥ 20%). After PSM, breast cancer-free survival (p = 0.45) and breast cancer specific survival (p = 0.81) were similar in the two groups. The recurrence rate was 12% vs 18% (p = 0.45) and the death rate was 6% vs 8% (p = 0.74) for the BCP and non-BCP groups, respectively. No difference in recurrence type was observed between the groups (p = 0.60).ConclusionsAfter PSM for known prognostic factors, the prognosis of BCP patients did not differ from that of young patients with non-BCP.     

Breast cancer and pregnancy: a diagnostic and management dilemma

Background: The purpose of the present paper was to review the current knowledge of pregnancy concurrent with a diagnosis of breast cancer, and how best to manage this group of women and those breast cancer survivors who may subsequently conceive. Results: Pregnancy‐associated breast cancer or gestational breast cancer is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or in the 12 months post‐partum. A review of the current literature on breast cancer‐related pregnancy suggests an incidence of between 0.7 and 3.9%. The prognosis is thought not to be significantly different from non‐pregnancy‐associated breast cancer, except in cases where a delay in diagnosis is associated with more advanced disease. The treatment is similar to non‐pregnant cases, with the exception of radiotherapy, which is contraindicated throughout pregnancy; and chemotherapy, which is contraindicated during the first trimester. Few breast cancer survivors go on to conceive, but those who do have no worse breast cancer or pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: Most of the research in this field has come from small, specialized institutions and may not reflect what occurs in the wider community. Further population‐based research in this area is needed, and is currently being undertaken in Western Australia.