Comparison of native and contrast-enhanced harmonic echocardiography for visualization of left ventricular endocardial border

Our study was designed to compare the utility of fundamental and second harmonic imaging (SH) for visualization of the left ventricular (LV) endocardial border. SH is a new imaging modality using nonlinear acoustic response, which may provide better endocardial border delineation. Standard apical views were studied in 42 patients using fundamental frequency (FF), SH without contrast (1.6- to 1.8-MHz and 2.1- to 2.5-MHz transmission frequencies), and SH after an intravenous injection of 2.5 g of Levovist. The quality of endocardial delineation in 16 standard segments was scored from 0 to 2. The endocardial visualization index was calculated as a mean of the scores. SH with and without contrast significantly improved LV endocardial border detection (endocardial visualization index 1.25+/-0.53, 1.64+/-0.67, 1.55+/-0.69, and 1.73+/-0.28 for fundamental, lower, and higher frequency harmonic and contrast-harmonic mode, respectively, p <0.005). Improvement was found in all LV segments. The number of invisible segments decreased from 142 (FF) to 54, 112, and 61 (in lower, higher, and contrast SH mode, respectively, p <0.001). Endocardial delineation in the apical segments using SH was optimal after contrast injection. In the basal LV area, contrast-enhanced images were less informative because of signal attenuation. Thus, SH significantly improves visualization of the LV endocardial border. Contrast enhancement with Levovist improves imaging of the apical segments but has no additional advantage in the basal segments. SH emerges as first-line modality for studies of LV function.     

Use of harmonic echocardiographic contrast imaging and intravenous bolus of Levovist for evaluation of the left ventricle

Harmonic imaging is a new imaging modality using nonlinear acoustic response, which is particularly sensitive for the particles of contrast agents. Our study was designed to compare the potential of harmonic echocardiographic imaging of the left ventricle using a contrast agent, Levovist to improve the detection of endocardium in patients with suboptimal image quality. 40 patients were studied using standard transthoracic apical views of the left ventricle patients using fundamental frequency and second harmonic frequency after and intravenous injection of 2.5 g Levovist. The quality of endocardial delineation in 16 standard segments was scored from 0 to 2. Endocardial visualization index was calculated as a mean of the scores to express overall diagnostic quality. Harmonic imaging with contrast significantly improved left ventricular endocardial border detection (endocardial visualization index at baseline 1.24 +/- 0.41, with contrast 1.63 +/- 0.38; p < 0.001). The improvement was qualitatively observed in all parts of the left ventricle: in apex (2.4 +/- 0.8), in the middle part (2.5 +/- 0.9) and slightly less in the basal part (2.1 +/- 1.1) as scored on a 0-3 scale. The number of invisible segments decreased from 124 (fundamental) to 50 in contrast harmonic mode. The persistence of the contrast enhancement, prolonged in harmonic as compared to fundamental imaging (284 +/- 136s vs 117 +/- 87s; p < 0.001) enabled convenient recording of all necessary views. Harmonic imaging after an intravenous injection of Levovist significantly improves the visualization of left ventricular endocardial border. Prolonged contrast effect after a single bolus enhances the pertinence of the method in clinical practice.     

Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonics for assessment of left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography is frequently challenging in mechanically ventilated patients. We evaluated the potential value of contrast-enhanced imaging and tissue harmonic imaging over standard fundamental imaging for endocardial border detection (EBD) in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent standard transthoracic 2D echocardiography and were imaged in fundamental and tissue harmonic modes and subsequently with intravenous contrast (Optison). Two echocardiographers reviewed all studies for ease of visualization of endocardial border segments and scoring of wall motion. EBD for each wall segment was graded from 1 to 4 (1 = excellent EBD). Wall motion was scored by a standard 16-segment model and 1 to 5 scale. Studies were categorized as nondiagnostic if 4 of 6 segments in the apical 4-chamber view were either poorly seen or not seen (EBD score 3 or 4). Quantification of ejection fraction was independently performed offline. Visualization of 68% of all segments improved with contrast echocardiography versus 17% improvement with tissue harmonics compared with fundamental mode. Significant improvement (poor/not seen to good/excellent) occurred in 60% of segments with contrast echocardiography versus 18% with tissue harmonics. A total of 850 segments were deemed poor/not seen, 78% of which improved to good/excellent with contrast echocardiography versus 23% with tissue harmonics. Interobserver agreement on EBD was 64% to 70%. Conversion of nondiagnostic to diagnostic studies occurred in 85% of patients with contrast echocardiography versus 15% of patients with tissue harmonics. Scoring of wall motion with fundamental mode, tissue harmonics, and contrast echocardiography was possible in 61%, 74%, and 95% of individual segments, respectively (P <.001). Wall motion scoring was altered in 17% of segments with contrast echocardiography and in 8% with tissue harmonics. Interobserver agreement on wall motion scoring was 84% to 88%. Contrast echocardiography permitted measurement of ejection fraction 45% (P =.003) more often over fundamental mode versus a 27% (P =.09) increase with tissue harmonics. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonic imaging for EBD, wall motion scoring, and quantification of ejection fraction in mechanically ventilated patients.     

Measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous contrast agent administration using standard echocardiographic equipment

The enhancement of endocardial border delineation using second harmonic imaging and contrast administration improves the measurement of ventricular volumes. In the majority of existing echocardiographic equipment, however, harmonic imaging is not yet available. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous administration of the contrast agent Levovist using standard echocardiographic equipment and fundamental imaging modality. In 10 patients with good-quality two-dimensional echo imaging, 4 g (400 mg/mL concentration) of Levovist was injected intravenously. Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2000 ultrasound equipment without second harmonic imaging capability was used. To avoid the destruction of microbubbles, the echo machine was set to produce only one end-systolic and one end-diastolic frame in each cardiac cycle (dual triggering). Native and contrast imaging measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions calculated by modified Simpson's rule were compared in the fundamental mode. Intraobserver and interobserver variability values were assessed. End-diastolic volumes in native continuous and triggered mode and by contrast echo were 126 +/- 48, 121 +/- 46, and 130 +/- 50 mL, respectively (NS), whereas end-systolic volumes were 79 +/- 48, 76 +/- 45, and 79 +/- 46 mL, respectively (NS). Calculated ejection fraction using the three different imaging modalities were 0.41 +/- 0.16, 0.41 +/- 0.16, and 0.42 +/- 0.16 (NS). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility values were excellent in triggered mode. Standard echocardiographic equipment with fundamental imaging modality in the triggered mode is suitable for the measurement of left ventricular volumes after intravenous Levovist administration. In clinically difficult patients, contrast echocardiography in triggered mode may be applied even if echocardiographic equipment does not have harmonic imaging possibility.     

Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Color Doppler for Left Ventricular Opacification: Improved Endocardial Border Definition Compared to Tissue Harmonic Imaging and Optimization of Methodology in Patients with Suboptimal Echocardiograms

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic color Doppler (C-HCD) and tissue harmonic imaging (THI) for left ventricular endocardial border delineation and explored the optimal methodology of C-HCD in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms. BACKGROUND: The value of C-HCD in improving endocardium remains unknown. Effects of harmonic velocity-encoded color Doppler (HVD) and harmonic power Doppler (HPD) as well as contrast administration and image acquisition modalities on left ventricular opacification (LVO) have not been established. METHODS: One hundred (50 HVD, 50 HPD) patients with suboptimal echocardiograms during conventional fundamental echocardiography were studied with THI and C-HCD using Levovist. Each patient underwent different random contrast administration and image acquisition modalities. Endocardial border definition score index (EBDI), blooming artifacts, contrast destruction, and salvage of suboptimal echocardiograms were calculated in each patient after contrast enhancement. RESULTS: EBDI improved from 2.05 +/- 0.61 in THI to 2.73 +/- 0.48 in HVD, and 1.98 +/- 0.73 in THI to 2.69 +/- 0.51 in HPD (both P < 0.001). The conversion of a nondiagnostic image from fundamental echocardiography to an optimal diagnostic image was 33 (33%) patients in THI compared to 77 (77%) patients in C-HCD (P < 0.001). Blooming artifacts were seen more commonly in HVD than HPD, intermittent than continuous image acquisition, and bolus than infusion administration (all P < 0.001). There was less contrast destruction in intermittent compared with continuous image acquisition (P < 0.001). Contrast destruction was similar in HVD and HPD, bolus and infusion injection of contrast. The highest salvage rate of a nondiagnostic image from THI to an optimal diagnostic image was 45.5% and 42.4% in HPD mode, with intermittent image acquisition during bolus and infusion contrast administrations. CONCLUSIONS: C-HCD seems more effective in demonstrating improved endocardial border definition compared to THI. HPD has less blooming artifacts compared with HCD. The optimal method for LVO was to use HPD with intermittent image acquisition during bolus or infusion administration of Levovist.     

Contrast and harmonic imaging improves accuracy and efficiency of novice readers for dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Newer contrast agents as well as tissue harmonic imaging enhance left ventricular (LV) endocardial border delineation, and therefore, improve LV wall-motion analysis. Interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography is observer-dependent and requires experience. This study was performed to evaluate whether these new imaging modalities would improve endocardial visualization and enhance accuracy and efficiency of the inexperienced reader interpreting dobutamine stress echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Both fundamental (2.5 MHZ) and harmonic (1.7 and 3.5 MHZ) mode images were obtained in four standard views at rest and at peak stress during a standard dobutamine infusion stress protocol. Following the noncontrast images, Optison was administered intravenously in bolus (0.5-3.0 ml), and fundamental and harmonic images were obtained. The dobutamine echocardiography studies were reviewed by one experienced and one inexperienced echocardiographer. LV segments were graded for image quality and function. Time for interpretation also was recorded. Contrast with harmonic imaging improved the diagnostic concordance of the novice reader to the expert reader by 7.1%, 7.5%, and 12.6% (P < 0.001) as compared with harmonic imaging, fundamental imaging, and fundamental imaging with contrast, respectively. For the novice reader, reading time was reduced by 47%, 55%, and 58% (P < 0.005) as compared with the time needed for fundamental, fundamental contrast, and harmonic modes, respectively. With harmonic imaging, the image quality score was 4.6% higher (P < 0.001) than for fundamental imaging. Image quality scores were not significantly different for noncontrast and contrast images. CONCLUSION: Harmonic imaging with contrast significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of the novice dobutamine stress echocardiography reader. The use of harmonic imaging reduces the frequency of nondiagnostic wall segments.     

Usefulness of the new imaging techniques, second harmonic and contrast in endocardial border visualization. Reliability analysis in segmental contraction assessment

AIM: This study sought to determine if newer techniques significantly improve endocardial border definition in suboptimal acoustic windows, and the reproducibility of the evaluation of wall motion abnormalities according to the different techniques and degrees of expertise. METHODS: We studied a total of 20 consecutive patients with poor ultrasound window, to assess, if the use of tissue harmonic imaging (2H) or contrast with second harmonic (Levovist ; 4 g i.v.), (2HC) improves endocardial border visualization.In order to analyze inter and intraobserver reliability with the different techniques, four observers with different degrees of expertise were each asked to assess the segmental wall motion score of 31 consecutive echocardiograms. RESULTS: The quality of the image was clearly superior with 2H and 2HC compared with 2D. This difference was larger in apex and lateral endocardial border from 0.9 and 1 to 1.5 and 1.64 (p < 0.001) with 2H. 2HC was found to slightly but significantly improve the endocardial definition in apex compared with 2H (1.64 vs 1.81; p = 0.016).The percentage of segments assessed for interobserver variability significantly improve with 2H and 2HC (2D = 50%, 2H = 75% and 2HC = 95%). Interobserver agreement with the different techniques between the experienced observers did not statistically differ. The less experienced observer presented a significantly lower interobserver reliability than those with experience, and did not improve with 2H and 2HC. CONCLUSIONS: a) Native tissue harmonic imaging and second harmonic imaging with contrast (Levovist ) significantly improves endocardial border visualization; b) the newer imaging techniques significantly improve performance (percentage of evaluated segments) without decreasing reliability, and c) experience in assessing wall motion is the main factor in interobserver agreement.     

Quantitative evaluation of regional endocardial visualisation with second harmonic imaging and contrast left ventricular opacification in heart failure patients.

AIMS: Wall motion score index (WMSI) is an important prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF) patients but requires endocardial visualisation. This study evaluated the role tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast opacification (LVO) for improving endocardial visualisation and the determination of WMSI in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one HF patients and 30 controls underwent apical echocardiography with fundamental imaging (FUND), THI and THI with contrast agent (Levovist). Visualisation and motion were graded in the six segments from each of the apical two and four chamber views. Both THI and LVO reduced the percentage of non-visualised segments (FUND 13.6%, THI 5.6%, LVO 2.8%, p=0.01) in the controls, but in HF patients, only THI improved visualisation (% segments not visualised FUND 9.7%, THI 3.5%, LVO 4.8%, p=0.06). The anterior and lateral walls were the least well visualised with FUND, but improved with LVO (anterior p=0.0026, lateral p=0.0003). No improvement was seen in the inferior wall (p=0.30) or septum (p=0.2). WMSI was similar by all methods and negatively correlated with ejection fraction (FUND r=-0.69, THI r=-0.74, LVO r=-0.77, all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: THI improved endocardial visualisation in all subjects and LVO offered additional benefit in the controls, but not in HF patients. Regional endocardial visualisation was inconsistent. Thus, both patient factors and wall segment site need to be considered when using contrast agents for endocardial visualisation.     

Usefulness of tissue harmonic imaging for the detection of left ventricular endocardial border

Assessment of segmental wall motion is one of the most challenging tasks in echocardiography. One major limitation is impairment of echocardiographic regional wall motion by incomplete endocardial definition. The newly developed tissue harmonic imaging method may improve the detection of left ventricular endocardial border. This study examined the impact of native tissue harmonic imaging on endocardial border definition. Fundamental and harmonic imaging were compared for detecting the endocardial border in 96 segments of 16 patients (age 54 +/- 8 years). Visualization of endocardial border was better with harmonic imaging than with fundamental mode in 49% (47 of 96 segments). Thus, tissue harmonic imaging has a significant impact on endocardial border definition.     

Harmonic Power Doppler Contrast Echocardiography: Preliminary Clinical Results

Background: In fundamental and second harmonic echocardiography new contrast media opacify the cavities and reduce the difference in the gray level between the cavity and the myocardium thus obscuring the borders of the myocardium. Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the potential usefulness of second harmonic power Doppler imaging (HPD) in providing adequate delineation of the myocardium from the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) cavities during intravenous contrast echocardiography. Using HPD, microbubbles in a cavity or a tissue are imaged as colored pixels superimposed on a conventional B-scan image. Methods: In a pilot study, three healthy volunteers and two patients with ischemic heart disease were investigated using an ATL-HDI 3000 echo system. Four chamber views were obtained using fundamental B-scan, harmonic B-scan two-dimensional echocardiography (H2D) and HPD following intravenous injections of 3 g Levovist*. Results: Using intermittent scanning/recording, H2D and HPD provided intensive and homogenous contrast effects in the RV and LV cavities. Good delineation of the myocardium was found in all subjects using HPD, whereas in two of three volunteers and in one of two patients ventricular septal and apical endocardial borders were obscured during H2D. No obvious change in myocardial backscatter was visually found with H2D. However, in all three healthy volunteers and in one of two patients, HPD recordings demonstrated patchy and reticular patterns in the myocardium, which were different from the homogenous signals in the LV cavity. These are consistent with imaging of intramyo-cardial coronary vessels. Conclusions: HPD with intravenous Levovist is feasible. This technique demonstrated good delineation of ventricular cavities from the myocardium as well as presence of visible contrast in the myocardium. This pilot study justifies further clinical trials to evaluate the clinical benefit of this approach.     

Harmonic imaging: echocardiographic enhanced contrast intensity and duration

The intensity and duration of contrast effect within the left ventricular cavity after an intravenous bolus of Levovist Injection were observed with both harmonic and fundamental imaging in nine patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Contrast intensity was assessed by a qualitative grading system (0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, good) and by videodensitometric analysis of pixel intensity. Duration of left ventricular contrast effect was determined by measuring time from the initial visual appearance of contrast agent to its disappearance. The mean increase in pixel intensity within the left ventricular cavity from precontrast to peak contrast was significantly greater for second harmonic than for fundamental imaging (25.5 vs 7.1; P < 0.012). The mean contrast intensity qualitative score with harmonic imaging was higher (2.6 ± 0.73 vs 1.2 ± 0.44; P < 0.01) and the duration of contrast effect was longer (242 ± 131 s vs 53 ± 33 s; P < 0.004). Second harmonic imaging significantly enhanced contrast intensity and prolonged visible duration of contrast effect after a peripheral venous injection of Levovist.     

Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with contrast (sonicated albumin echocardiography and Doppler myocardial imaging for enhancing endocardial border resolution

Endocardial resolution during 2-dimensional echocardiography is technically limited in at least 10% to 15% of patients. Recently, several ultrasound imaging innovations have been introduced that may improve endocardial resolution and decrease the proportion of technically difficult studies. This study compares tissue harmonic imaging, intravenous sonicated albumin, and Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with technically difficult echocardiograms. Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected cardiac disease and poor baseline endocardial resolution were studied. Only harmonic imaging (conventional and optimized for tissue) was superior to baseline fundamental imaging (p <0.001). Harmonic imaging was superior to baseline imaging in all myocardial regions and in the majority of patients, including those with the worst baseline studies.     

Detection of left ventricular endocardial border with tissue harmonic imaging

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic wave propagation in human tissues is not linear. As a consequence, harmonic waves, whose frequency is a multiple (harmonic) of the emitted frequency, are generated. Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) processes only the second harmonic frequency in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal. The study was aimed at investigating the impact of THI on the detection of the Left Ventricular (LV) endocardial border. Attention was paid to determine which LV walls were analysed more clearly with THI rather than with conventional Fundamental Frequency Imaging (FFI). METHODS: We compared the FFI and the THI visualization of the 16 LV segments and of the 6 LV walls in 30 consecutive patients by scoring the images as bad, sufficient or good. The equipment used was a GE Vingmed System Five (Orten, Norway). RESULTS: Images were good in 85% of segments explored with THI, whereas FFI provided good images in 47% of segments (p<0.001). From the apical window, visualization of the apex, lateral wall and anterior wall significantly improved with THI; using the parasternal approach, imaging of posterior wall was definitely better with THI than with FFI. CONCLUSIONS: THI enhances both endocardial visualization and global image quality. Tech-nical development, however, increases the diagnostic possibilities of echocardiography but does not substitute the operator's experience.     

Enhanced visualisation of the right ventricle by contrast echocardiography in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Contrast echocardiography improves endocardial border detection of the left ventricle. Whether this is also true for the right ventricle (RV) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether the use of contrast (Sonovue) echocardiography has additional value in RV endocardial border visualisation (EBV), and whether it has impact on the echocardiographic judgement of RV function. METHODS: Twenty adult patients with congenital heart disease were imaged using second harmonic two-dimensional echocardiography with and without contrast. Two independent observers analysed EBV of 13 RV wall segments in each patient. EBV was graded for each wall segment from 0 to 3 ( 0 = not visible, 3 = optimal visible). RESULTS: EBV improved in all patients with contrast echocardiography compared to second harmonic imaging (mean EBV 1.00 +/- 0.77 with second harmonics, 2.13 +/- 0.75 with contrast, P < 0.0001). The benefit was most evident in the near-field images. In 55% of the patients visual estimation of RV function changed with contrast echocardiography. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast echocardiography is superior to second harmonic imaging for RV EBV. Improved EBV may allow more accurate assessment of RV dimensions and function.     

Intravenous contrast echocardiography

Intravenous contrast echocardiography has become possible in Japan because of the release of the commercially available contrast agent, Levovist. Intravenous administration of Levovist satisfactorily stains the left ventricular cavity, which makes it possible to clearly delineate the endocardial border. Clear delineation of the endocardial border provides easy and accurate measurement of left ventricular dimension and wall thickness, and wall motion abnormalities can be easily and accurately judged, too. Another benefit of intravenous contrast echocardiography is the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Our preliminary experimental and clinical experiences showed the possibility of myocardial staining with intravenous contrast echocardiography. Impressive myocardial staining is obtainable with the combined use of intermittent and contrast harmonic power Doppler imaging. In order to obtain reproducible and clear myocardial contrast images, we have to pay attention to how to inject contrast and settings of ultrasound equipment, i.e., mechanical index, gain setting, depth of focus point, and pulse repetition frequency, artifacts. In the near future, a lot of issues should be standardized to make it possible to compare myocardial contrast echo studies.     

Enhancement of Left Ventricular Cavity Opacification by Harmonic Imaging After Venous Injection of Albunex

Venous injection of Albunex does not consistently produce left ventricular (LV) cavity opacification during conventional echocardiography. We postulated that by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, harmonic imaging will result in more successful LV cavity opacification and provide a better assessment of regional LV systolic function. Forty-two patients with poor baseline endocardial delineation were given 10 ml intravenous injections of Albunex during continuous fundamental and harmonic imaging. Change in segmental wall-thickening scores and the confidence levels for these scores were assessed for 3 observers with various levels of experience. Compared with fundamental imaging, harmonic imaging significantly improved the success of LV cavity opacification (83% vs 62%, p <0.05). The background-subtracted video intensity within the central two thirds of the LV cavity increased threefold (from 10 ± 15 to 31 ± 29, p <0.05) with harmonic imaging. The spatial extent of opacification increased from 40% of the LV cavity during fundamental imaging to 65% with harmonic imaging (p <0.001). The confidence level for assessing regional LV systolic function improved (p <0.05) after contrast administration, particularly when observer experience was limited. We conclude that in patients with poor endocardial definition, injection of intravenous Albunex should be combined with harmonic imaging to improve LV cavity opacification.

We assessed left ventricular (LV) cavity opacification produced by venous injection of Albunex during fundamental and harmonic imaging in 42 patients. Harmonic imaging significantly increased the success rate of LV cavity opacification, the background-subtracted peak video intensity, and the spatial extent of cavity opacification; harmonic imaging also improved the confidence level for assessing regional LV systolic function, especially in readers with less experience.     

Effect of tissue harmonic imaging and contrast upon between observer and test-retest reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction measurement in patients with heart failure

AIMS: To investigate the effects of tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast chamber opacification (LVO) upon measurement variability and reproducibility of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) measurements in patients with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is often used in HF patients to determine LV volumes and EF. However, current echo methods are variable and may not be applicable for repeat testing in individual patients. THI and LVO have both been shown to improve endocardial visualisation, but it remains to be determined whether this results in better measurement reproducibility. METHODS: Thirty-one HF patients and 30 control subjects underwent echocardiography on two separate days. LV volumes were measured under four different imaging conditions: fundamental, THI, LVO and LVO with ECG-triggered Power Doppler. Chamber opacification, pulmonary transit time (PTT), endocardial enhancement, reproducibility and bias were assessed. RESULTS: Chamber opacification was inferior and the PTT longer in the HF patients. PTT was related to LV volumes, EF, jugular venous pressure and mitral filling pattern. THI improved endocardial visualisation, and although LVO improved endocardial visualisation in the controls, it offered no benefit over THI in the HF patients. LV volumes and EF were different for each method and THI was the least variable method for repeat measurements. CONCLUSIONS: THI improved endocardial visualisation and was the least variable of the techniques. LVO offered no further advantage in patients with HF and thus cannot be routinely advocated and since LV volumes and EF were different for each, these methods are neither comparable nor interchangeable for follow-up assessments.     

Enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation with an intravenous injection of SonoVue, a new echocardiographic contrast agent: A European multicenter study

The safety and efficacy of SonoVue (also referred to as BR1), a new contrast agent for delineating endocardial border of the left ventricle after intravenous administration, was assessed. Two hundred and eighteen patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing fundamental echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricle were enrolled in a prospective multicenter, single blind, cross-over study with random sequence allocation of four different doses of SonoVue. Endocardial border definition in the apical and parasternal views was scored as 0 = not visible, 1 = barely visible, and 2 = well visualized before and after contrast enhancement. Analysis was performed by two pairs of off-site observers. Safety of SonoVue was also assessed. Results of our study indicated that the mean improvements in the endocardial border visualization score were as follows: 3.1 +/- 7.8 (95% CI, 2.5 and 3.7) for 0.5 ml, 3.4 +/- 8.0 (95% CI, 2.8 and 4.0) for 1 ml, 3.4 +/- 7.9 (95% CI, 2.8 and 4.0) for 2 ml, and 3.7 +/- 8.0 (95% CI, 3.1 and 4.3) for 4 ml (P < 0.05 for all doses from baseline). Changes from baseline in endocardial visualization scores were also seen in the apical views (P < 0.05) and they were dose-dependent (P < 0.001). Similar enhancements of endocardial visualization scores were observed in the apical views in patients with suboptimal baseline echocardiographic images. Diagnostic confidence for assigning a score and image quality also were significantly better following contrast enhancement. No significant changes in the laboratory parameters and vital signs were noted following contrast enhancement, and the side effects were minimal. It was concluded that SonoVue is safe and effective in delineating endocardial border, including in patients with suboptimal baseline images.     

Endocardial border delineation during dobutamine infusion using contrast echocardiography

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of pharmacologic stress echocardiograms produce suboptimal images despite the use of second harmonic imaging. Intravenous continuous infusion of myocardial ultrasound contrast may enhance endocardial border delineation during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE), improving wall-motion analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 68 patients (41 males and 27 females), mean age 58 years, with DASE during intravenous infusion of contrast using second harmonic imaging. Dobutamine was infused in scalar doses of 5 microg/kg/min to 40 microg/kg/min, and atropine was administered in doses of up to 1 mg. We diluted 0.1 mL of perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin (PESDA) microbubbles into 80 mL of saline solution, which was used for continuous intravenous infusion. Blinded reviewers used a 16-segment model at rest and peak DASE to analyze segmental wall delineation in two sets of images for each patient, with and without contrast. An endocardial delineation score of 0-3 (nondelineated to excellent delineation) was given to each segment. An endocardial delineation score index (EDSI), the number of endocardial delineation scores for each set of images divided by 16, was created. RESULTS: The analysis of the mean EDSI for the 2176 segments was 1.46 (+/- 0.43) at rest and 1.30 (+/- 0.48) at peak for noncontrast images and 2.22 (+/- 0.52) and 2.29 (+/- 0.52) for contrast images. Complete left ventricle opacification was obtained in all patients, with a mean dose of 4 mL/min, although in 15 (22%) patients, signs of apical bubble destruction occurred. There were 1768 (81%) of 2176 segments delineated without contrast enhancement and 2057 (95%) of 2176 with enhancement (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of myocardial ultrasound contrast improves endocardial border delineation using second harmonic imaging in patients undergoing DASE.     

Reproducibility of intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy subjects

Few data have been published on the reproducibility of baseline subtracted peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography. We investigated the reproducibility of the peak intensity measured from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in 10 young healthy males. The contrast echocardiography was obtained using the second harmonic mode with an intravenous bolus injection of Levovist (first study). The same myocardial contrast echocardiography was repeated after the first study (second study). The myocardial opacification and peak intensity in the 12 segments of the apical 4 and 2 chamber views were assessed visually and quantitatively. The differences in the peak intensity between the initial and repeated measurements in the first study (intraobserver reproducibility) and between the initial measurements in the first and second studies (interinjection reproducibility) were assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The degree of opacification was good or intermediate in 207/228 (91%) of the segments. The agreement of myocardial opacification between the first and second studies was 87/114 (76%). However, significantly higher peak intensity was obtained in apical septal (8200 +/- 6300 au2) and mid septal (8500 +/- 6000 au2) segments in the 4 chamber view and in the mid inferior (12400 +/- 9300 au2) and apical inferior (10700 +/- 6300 au2) segments in the 2 chamber view compared with other segments. The mean differences of the peak intensities according to the Bland and Altman analysis was -1600 +/- 5000 au2 in the intraobserver reproducibility study, and -1100 +/- 5300 au2 in the interinjection reproducibility study. Thus, the measurement error was determined to range from 8400 au2 to 9500 au2 in both studies. We conclude that the peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography using Levovist varies significantly among segments in the left ventricular myocardium. Large intraobserver and interinjection variability exists in the measurement of peak intensity, suggesting that the reproducibility of this technique is limited for quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion.