Behavioral effects of chronic exposure to low concentrations of halothane during development in rats

Long-term behavioral effects of chronic exposure to low concentrations of halothane were evaluated in rats exposed to low (12.5 ppm) concentrations from day 2 of conception until either 30 (halothane-30) or 60 (halothane-60) days after birth. Rats similarly treated but not exposed to halothane served as controls. When these rats were tested for radial arm maze exploration as adults (1 yr old) both exposure groups showed significant deficits compared with controls. The halothane-treated rats entered significantly fewer arms before reentering an arm (entries-to-repeat). At 55 days of age, in the spontaneous alternation test, response speed was significantly slower than controls in both halothane-30 and halothane-60 rats. This effect was not seen in rats more than 55 days old. Replicating previous results, the halothane-60 rats showed deficits in learning a light-dark discrimination. This deficit was not seen with halothane-30 rats, indicating that continued halothane exposure during the 30- through 60-day period was necessary for inducing a noticeable long-term learning deficit. The results show that chronic exposure of rats to low concentrations of halothane during development results in subsequent behavioral alteration, and that termination of halothane exposure at 30 days of age rather than at 60 days of age avoids some of the signs of behavioral impairment.     

Arterial to inspired partial pressure ratio of halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane in rats

The inspired partial pressure of an anaesthetic is often used as an index of arterial partial pressure in small animal experiments. We have investigated the influence of anaesthetic solubility on the ratio of arterial to inspired partial pressure in 24 rats, allocated randomly to receive halothane, isoflurane or desflurane at four different inspired concentrations. The arterial partial pressure of the volatile agent was measured by two-stage headspace analysis using a gas chromatograph calibrated with the same gas used to calibrate the Datex Capnomac that measured the inspired concentration. Mean values of arterial to inspired ratio at the lowest concentrations were 0.60 (95% confidence intervals 0.50, 0.71) for 0.8% halothane, 0.54 (0.38, 0.69) for 0.8% isoflurane, 0.72 (0.59, 0.86) for 1.5% sevoflurane and 0.71 (0.54, 0.87) for 4% desflurane. Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of anaesthetic agent (P = 0.008) on the arterial to inspired ratio. Thus volatile anaesthetic agents do not demonstrate a fixed arterial to inspired ratio in rats.      

Pharmacokinetics of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in pigs

We tested the prediction that the alveolar washin and washout, tissue time constants, and pulmonary recovery (volume of agent recovered during washout relative to the volume taken up during washin) of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane would be defined primarily by their respective solubilities in blood, by their solubilities in tissues, and by their metabolism. We concurrently administered approximately one-third the MAC of each of these anesthetics to five young female swine and determined (separately) their solubilities in pig blood and tissues. The blood/gas partition coefficient of desflurane (0.35 +/- 0.02) was significantly smaller (P less than 0.01) than that of sevoflurane (0.45 +/- 0.02), isoflurane (0.94 +/- 0.05), and halothane (2.54 +/- 0.21). Tissue/blood partition coefficients of desflurane and halothane were smaller than those for the other two anesthetics (P less than 0.05) for all tissue groups. As predicted from their blood solubilities, the order of washin and washout was desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane (most to least rapid). As predicted from tissue solubilities, the tissue time constants for desflurane were smaller than those for sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane. Recovery (normalized to that of isoflurane) of the volume of anesthetic taken up was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) for desflurane (93% +/- 7% [mean +/- SD]) than for halothane (77% +/- 6%), was not different from that of isoflurane (100%), but was less than that for sevoflurane (111% +/- 17%). The lower value for halothane is consistent with its known metabolism, but the lower (than sevoflurane) value for desflurane is at variance with other presently available data for their respective biodegradations.     

In vitro effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in isolated human right atria

BACKGROUND: Direct myocardial effects of volatile anesthetics have been studied in various animal species in vitro. This study evaluated the effects of equianesthetic concentrations of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane on contractile parameters of isolated human atria in vitro. METHODS: Human right atrial trabeculae, obtained from patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, were studied in an oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) Tyrode's modified solution ([Ca2+]o = 2.0 mM, 30 degrees C, stimulation frequency 0.5 Hz). The effects of equianesthetic concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane on inotropic and lusitropic parameters of isometric twitches were measured. RESULTS: Isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane induced a moderate concentration-dependent decrease in active isometric force, which was significantly lower than that induced by halothane. In the presence of adrenoceptor blockade, the desflurane-induced decrease in peak of the positive force derivative and time to peak force became comparable to those induced by isoflurane. Halothane induced a concentration-dependent decrease in time to half-relaxation and a contraction-relaxation coupling parameter significantly greater than those induced by isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. CONCLUSIONS: In isolated human atrial myocardium, desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane induced a moderate concentration-dependent negative inotropic effect. The effect of desflurane on time to peak force and peak of the positive force derivative could be related to intramyocardial catecholamine release. At clinically relevant concentrations, desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane did not modify isometric relaxation.     

Myocardial effects of halothane and sevoflurane in diabetic rats

BACKGROUND: Diabetes induces significant myocardial abnormalities, but the effects of halogenated anesthetics on this diseased myocardium remain a matter of debate. METHODS: Left ventricular papillary muscles and triton-skinned cardiac fibers were provided from control and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The effects of halothane and sevoflurane were studied on inotropic and lusitropic responses, under low (isotony) and high (isometry) loads in papillary muscles and then on isometric tension-Ca2+ concentration (pCa) relations obtained in triton-skinned cardiac fibers. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Sevoflurane and halothane induced a negative inotropic effect that was more important in diabetic rats (active force: 1.5% halothane, 19+/-6 vs. 24+/-6% of baseline, P < 0.05; 3.6% sevoflurane, 47+/-14 vs. 69+/-17% of baseline, P < 0.05). However, when differences in minimum alveolar concentration were considered, no significant difference was observed between groups for halothane. The effects of halothane and sevoflurane on isotonic relaxation and postrest potentiation were not significantly different between groups. In contrast, the decrease in Ca myofilament sensitivity produced by each anesthetic agent was greater in diabetic rats than in control rats (0.65% halothane, -0.15+/-0.07 vs. -0.05+/-0.04 pCa unit, P < 0.05; 1.8% sevoflurane, -0.12+/-0.06 vs. -0.06+/-0.04 pCa unit, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The negative inotropic effect of halothane and sevoflurane was greater in diabetic rats, mainly because of a significant decrease in myofilament Ca sensitivity.     

Oxidative stress status during exposure to propofol, sevoflurane and desflurane

We evaluated the circulating and lung oxidative status during general anesthesia established with propofol, sevoflurane, or desflurane in mechanically ventilated swine. Blood samples and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) specimens were respectively performed via an internal jugular vein catheter and a nonbronchoscopic BAL for baseline oxidative activity measurements: malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX). A 4-h general anesthesia was then performed in the three groups of 10 swine: the Propofol group received 8 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) of IV propofol as the sole anesthetic; the Desflurane group received 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane; and the Sevoflurane group received 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane. We observed significantly larger levels of MDA in plasma and BAL during desflurane exposure than with the other anesthetics. We also observed smaller concentrations of circulating GPX and alveolar GPX. We found a significant decrease for MDA measurements in the plasma and the pulmonary lavage during propofol anesthesia. We also found larger values of GPX measurements in the serum and the pulmonary lavage. No significant changes were observed when animals were exposed to sevoflurane. No significant changes were found for circulating concentrations of SOD during exposure to all anesthetics. In this mechanically ventilated swine model, desflurane seemed to induce a local and systemic oxidative stress, whereas propofol and sevoflurane were more likely to have antioxidant properties. IMPLICATIONS: Superoxide is an unavoidable byproduct of oxygen metabolism that occurs in various inflammatory reactions. Inhalation of volatile anesthetics under mechanical ventilation induces an inflammatory response. We evaluated the bronchoalveolar and systemic oxidative stress in swine during exposure to propofol and newer volatile anesthetics. Desflurane induces more lipid peroxidation than do the other anesthetics.     

Effects of desflurane, sevoflurane and halothane on postinfarction spontaneous dysrhythmias in dogs

Background: Although desflurane (DES) and sevoflurane (SEV) have desirable features for use in patients with coronary artery disease, their effects on ventricular dysrhythmias following infarction are less known. We therefore examined the effects of DES and SEV upon spontaneous postinfarction ventricular dysrhythmias in dogs, and compared those effects to the well-established antidysrhythmic effects of halothane (HAL) in this model.
Methods : After institutional approval, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated in 16 adult mongrel dogs during isoflurane anesthesia. All dogs developed acute myocardial infarction and severe ventricular tachydysrhythmias. Twenty-two hours after infarction, dogs were anesthetized at 1.5 MAC with desflurane (10.8%) followed by sevoflurane (3.5%) in the treatment group (n=10), or halothane (1.3%) in the other group (n=6). Anesthetic gases were allowed to equilibrate for at least 20 min at each end-tidal concentration. At this time, the ECG was recorded for 9 min and evaluated for the number of ventricular ectopic and sinoatrial beats and summed duration of ventricular tachycardia.
Results: DES and SEV reduced the average rate of total ventricular ectopic beats by 40 ±4% and 42 ±4%, respectively. HAL decreased total ventricular ectopic rate by 59 ±6% and 62 ±5% after durations of anesthesia comparable to DES and SEV, respectively. Decreases in dysrhythmia in the presence of DES and SEV were significantly smaller than those produced by HAL after a comparable total duration of anesthesia.
Conclusions: DES and SEV inhibit spontaneous postinfarction ventricular dysrhythmias, although attenuation of dysrhythmias was smaller than the inhibition during comparable doses of HAL.     

Pharmacological preconditioning: comparison of desflurane,sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane in rabbit myocardium

Background. Recent investigations showed that isoflurane caninduce pharmacological preconditioning. The present study aimedto compare the potency of four different halogenated anaestheticsto induce preconditioning. Methods. Anaesthetized open-chest rabbits underwent 30 min ofcoronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Beforethis, rabbits were randomized into one of five groups and underwenta treatment period consisting of either no intervention for45 min (control; n=10), or 30 min of 1 MAC halogenated anaestheticinhalation followed by 15 min of washout. End-tidal concentrationsof halogenated agents were 3.7% for sevoflurane (n=11), 1.4%for halothane (n=9), 2.0% for isoflurane (n=11), and 8.9% fordesflurane (n=11). Area at risk and infarct size were assessedby blue dye injection and tetrazolium chloride staining. Results. Mean (SD) infarct size was 54 (18)% of the risk areain untreated controls and 40 (18)% in the sevoflurane group(P>0.05, ns). In contrast, mean infarct size was significantlysmaller in the halothane, isoflurane, and desflurane groups:26 (18)%, 32 (18)% and 16 (17)%, respectively (P<0.05 vscontrol). Conclusions. Halothane, isoflurane and desflurane induced pharmacologicalpreconditioning, whereas sevoflurane had no significant effect.In this preparation, desflurane was the most effective agentat preconditioning the myocardium against ischaemia. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 486–91     

Solubility of desflurane (I-653), sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in human blood

The blood/gas partition coefficients for the new volatile anesthetic agent desflurane (I-653), sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane were determined, simultaneously, in 8 human volunteers to compare the solubilities of these agents in blood. The blood/gas partition coefficient for desflurane [0.49 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SD)] was smallest, followed by sevoflurane (0.62 +/- 0.04), isoflurane (1.27 +/- 0.06), and halothane (2.46 +/- 0.09). Differences among the anesthetic agents were significant (P less than 0.001). The results of this study confirm that among these agents the solubility of desflurane in human blood is the smallest. The results suggest that the washin and washout of desflurane will be more rapid than that of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane, and the washin and washout of sevoflurane will be more rapid than that of isoflurane and halothane.     

Effect of temperature on the solubility of desflurane, sevoflurane, enflurane and halothane in blood

We have investigated the effect of temperature on the blood-gas solubility of desflurane, sevoflurane, enflurane and halothane. Blood was equilibrated with gas mixtures of known composition in open cuvette or closed flask tonometers over a temperature range of 29-39 degrees C, and the concentration of each anaesthetic in blood was measured at 37 degrees C by repeated headspace analysis using a gas chromatograph. Solubility increased by 5.4% of the solubility at 37 degrees C for each degree that equilibration temperature was reduced. This result was true for all anaesthetics in all blood samples, and is in keeping with results for other volatile anaesthetics.      

Volatile anaesthetics and the atmosphere: atmospheric lifetimes and atmospheric effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane

The atmospheric lifetimes of the halogenated anaesthetics halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane with respect to reaction with the hydroxyl radical (OH.) and UV photolysis have been determined from observations of OH. reaction kinetics and UV absorption spectra. Rate coefficients for the reaction with OH radicals for all halogenated anaesthetics investigated ranged from 0.44 to 2.7 x 10(-14) cm3 molec-1 s-1. Halothane, enflurane and isoflurane showed distinct UV absorption in the range 200-350 nm. In contrast, no absorption in this wavelength range was detected for desflurane or sevoflurane. The total atmospheric lifetimes, as derived from both OH. reactivity and photolysis, were 4.0-21.4 yr. It has been calculated that up to 20% of anaesthetics enter the stratosphere. As a result of chlorine and bromine content, the ozone depletion potential (ODP) relative to chlorofluorocarbon CFC-11 varies between 0 and 1.56, leading to a contribution to the total ozone depletion in the stratosphere of approximately 1% for halothane and 0.02% for enflurane and isoflurane. Estimates of the greenhouse warming potential (GWP) relative to CFC-12 yield values of 0.02-0.14, resulting in a relative contribution to global warming of all volatile anaesthetics of approximately 0.03%. The stratospheric impact of halothane, isoflurane and enflurane and their influence on ozone depletion is of increasing importance because of decreasing chlorofluorocarbons globally. However, the influence of volatile anaesthetics on greenhouse warming is small.      

A comparison of the respiratory effects of high concentrations of halothane and sevoflurane

We studied the respiratory effects of the administration of either 5% halothane or 8% sevoflurane in 70% nitrous oxide (N2O) for 5 min in 21 boys aged 1-5 years. A similar degree of ventilatory depression was noted with both agents. Minute volume fell by approximately 50% as a result of a reduction in tidal volume despite an increase in respiratory rate.     

Effects of halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane on the force-frequency relation in the dog heart in vivo

PURPOSE: Frequency potentiation is the increase in force of contraction induced by an increased heart rate (HR). This positive staircase phenomenon has been attributed to changes in Ca2+ entry and loading of intracellular Ca2+ stores. Volatile anesthetics interfere with Ca2+ homeostasis of cardiomyocytes. We hypothesized that frequency potentiation is altered by volatile anesthetics and investigated the influence of halothane (H), sevoflurane (S) and desflurane (D) on the positive staircase phenomenon in dogs in vivo. METHODS: Dogs were chronically instrumented for measurement of left ventricular (LV) pressure and cardiac output. Heart rate was increased by atrial pacing from 120 to 220 beats x min(-1) and the LV maximal rate of pressure increase (dP/dt(max)) was determined as an index of myocardial performance. Measurements were performed in conscious dogs and during anesthesia with 1.0 minimal alveolar concentrations of each of the three inhaled anesthetics. RESULTS: Increasing HR from 120 to 220 beats x min(-1) increased dP/dt(max) from 3394 +/- 786 (mean +/- SD) to 3798 +/- 810 mmHg sec(-1) in conscious dogs. All anesthetics reduced dP/dt(max) during baseline (at 120 beats x min(-1): H, 1745 +/- 340 mmHg x sec(-1); S, 1882 +/- 418; D, 1928 +/- 454, all P < 0.05 vs awake) but did not influence the frequency potentiation of dP/dt(max) (at 220 beats x min(-1): H, 1981 +/- 587 mmHg x sec(-1); S, 2187 +/- 787; D, 2307 +/- 691). The slope of the regression line correlating dP/dt(max) and HR was not different between awake and anesthetized dogs. Increasing HR did not influence cardiac output in awake or anesthetized dogs. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that volatile anesthetics do not alter the force-frequency relation in dogs in vivo.     

Relaxation by sevoflurane, desflurane and halothane in the isolated guinea-pig trachea via inhibition of cholinergic neurotransmission

We have studied relaxation of airway smooth muscle by sevoflurane, desflurane and halothane in the isolated guinea-pig trachea. Ring preparations were mounted in tissue baths filled with physiological salt solution (PSS), aerated continuously with 5% carbon dioxide in oxygen. Electrical field stimulation (EFS) elicited cholinergic contractions that were abolished by tetrodotoxin, indicating nerve- mediated responses. Anaesthetics were added to the gas aerating the tissue baths. Halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane at 0.5-1.0 MAC markedly attenuated cholinergic contractions to EFS. Initiation of contractile responses to acetylcholine (ACh) were not affected by volatile anaesthetics, suggesting prejunctional inhibition (i.e. inhibition of acetylcholine release). When added to a maintained submaximal contraction to ACh, volatile anaesthetics induced relaxation, indicating postjunctional inhibition. We conclude that sevoflurane, desflurane and halothane inhibited postganglionic cholinergic neuroeffector transmission in the trachea. The effect was probably exerted via pre- and postjunctional mechanisms (i.e. inhibition of acetylcholine release and direct muscle actions). Sevoflurane and desflurane were more potent than halothane both pre- and postjunctionally.      

Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on myocardial reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart

A specific action against myocardial reperfusion injury of the oxygen paradox type was recently characterized for halothane after anoxic perfusion in isolated rat hearts and isolated cardiomyocytes. In this study, we have characterized the protective effects of the clinically available inhalation anaesthetics during reperfusion after ischaemia. In isolated, isovolumically beating rat hearts perfused at a constant flow (10 ml min-1, PO2 80 kPa) and paced at 350 beat min-1, we determined left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and release of creatine kinase (CKR) as indices of myocardial performance and cellular injury, respectively. Seven control hearts underwent 30 min of no-flow ischaemia and 1 h of reperfusion. In the treatment groups, halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane (each group n = 6) was added to the perfusion medium for the first 30 min of reperfusion at a concentration corresponding to 1.5 MAC in the rat. In the control group, cellular injury occurred at early reperfusion (peak CKR 283 (SEM 57) iu litre-1 at 10 min of reperfusion). Peak CKR to the coronary venous effluent was attenuated by all anaesthetics (halothane group 156 (45), enflurane group 134 (20), sevoflurane group 132 (20), desflurane group 159 (25) iu litre-1; each P < 0.05). Isoflurane did not differ from controls (303 (53) iu litre-1; P = 0.5). In the sevoflurane group, there was a delayed peak CKR after discontinuation of the anaesthetic at 30 min of reperfusion (260 (34) iu litre-1). Functional recovery was improved by all anaesthetics, but was seen much earlier with desflurane (LVDP 28 (3)% of baseline at 5 min reperfusion compared with halothane (6 (1)%), enflurane (11 (3)%), isoflurane (9 (6)%), sevoflurane (10 (2)%) and controls (3 (1)% of baseline)). At 30 min of reperfusion, recovery of LVDP was improved to a similar extent by all anaesthetics (halothane 30 (9)%, enflurane 36 (9)%, isoflurane 33 (5)%, sevoflurane 30 (5)%, desflurane 36 (4)% of baseline values) compared with controls (13 (5)%; each P < 0.05). All inhalation anaesthetics protected against myocardial reperfusion injury, but showed differences in attenuation of cellular injury and functional recovery. These differences may suggest different protective mechanisms.      

Carbon monoxide production from desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane with dry soda lime.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in which volatile anesthetics were exposed to small amounts of dry soda lime, generally controlled at or close to ambient temperatures, have demonstrated a large carbon monoxide (CO) production from desflurane and enflurane, less from isoflurane, and none from halothane and sevoflurane. However, there is a report of increased CO hemoglobin in children who had been induced with sevoflurane that had passed through dry soda lime. Because this clinical report appears to be inconsistent with existing laboratory work, the authors investigated CO production from volatile anesthetics more realistically simulating conditions in clinical absorbers. METHODS: Each agent, 2.5 or 5% in 2 l/min oxygen, were passed for 2 h through a Dr?ger absorber canister (bottom to top) filled with dried soda lime (Dr?gersorb 800). CO concentrations were continuously measured at the absorber outlet. CO production was calculated. Experiments were performed in ambient air (19-20 degrees C). The absorbent temperature was not controlled. RESULTS: Carbon monoxide production peaked initially and was highest with desflurane (507 +/- 70, 656 +/- 59 ml CO), followed by enflurane (460 +/- 41, 475 +/- 99 ml CO), isoflurane (176 +/- 2.8, 227 +/- 21 ml CO), sevoflurane (34 +/- 1, 104 +/- 4 ml CO), and halothane (22 +/- 3, 20 +/- 1 ml CO) (mean +/- SD at 2.5 and 5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The absorbent temperature increased with all anesthetics but was highest for sevoflurane. The reported magnitude of CO formation from desflurane, enflurane, and isoflurane was confirmed. In contrast, a smaller but significant CO formation from sevoflurane was found, which may account for the CO hemoglobin concentrations reported in infants. With all agents, CO formation appears to be self-limited.     

Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia

Purpose

To determine the magnitude of the potentiation of rocuronium by desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane 1.5 MAC anaesthesia.

Methods

In a prospective, randomised, study in 80 patients, the cumulative dose-effect curves for rocuronium were determined during anaesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane (with N₂O 70%, 15 min steady state) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography (TOF-Guard®) after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve (2Hz every 12sec, 200 μsec duration), Rocuronium was administered in increments of 100 μg·kg^?1 until first twitch (T₁) depression > 95%.

Results

Rocuronium led to more pronounced T₁ depression with desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia than with TIVA. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ were lower during desflurane (95 ± 25 and 190 ± 80 μg·kg^?1) and sevoflurane (120 ±30 and 210 ± 40 μg·kg^?1) than with TIVA (150 ± 40 and 310 ± 90 μg·kg^?1) (P < .01), while the difference was not significant for isoflurane (130 ± 40 and 250 ± 90 μg·kg^?1). Following equi-effective dosing (T₁ > 95%) the duration to 25% T₁ recovery, recovery index (25/75), and TOF_0.70 was: 13.2 ± 1.8, 12.7 ± 3.4, and 26.9 ± 5.7 min during anaesthesia with desflurane; 15.5 ± 5.0, 11.4 ± 3.8, and 31.0 ± 6.0 min with sevoflurane; 13.9 ± 4.7, 10.7 ± 3.3, and 26.3 ± 8.9 min with isoflurane; and 13.9 ± 3.9, 11.3 ± 5.7, and 27.5 ± 8,2 min with TIVA anaesthesia (P: NS).

Conclusion

Interaction of rocuronium and volatile anaesthetics resulted in augmentation of the intensity of neuromuscular block but did not result in significant effects on duration of or recovery from the block.     

Renal responses to low-flow desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol in patients

BACKGROUND: The contributing factors that result in significant, postoperative proteinuria and glucosuria after low-flow isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia are unknown. The present study compared renal responses after anesthesia with desflurane (negligible metabolism), sevoflurane, or intravenous propofol. METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from 52 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III (aged 36-81 yr). Patients with diabetes or renal insufficiency were excluded. Desflurane (n = 20) or sevoflurane (n = 22), without nitrous oxide, was given at 1 l/min fresh gas flow for elective surgical procedures lasting more than 2 h; 10 patients received propofol without nitrous oxide as the primary anesthetic. Blood and urine chemistries were obtained before surgery. Blood and 24-h urine collections were obtained for 3 days after surgery and were analyzed for liver and renal indices. RESULTS: Length of surgery averaged approximately 300 min (range, 136-750 min), minimum alveolar concentration-hour averaged 4.3 (range, 1.2-11.0), and infusion rates of propofol were 99-168 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Plasma creatinine concentration did not change, plasma blood urea nitrogen decreased significantly, and significant increases in urine glucose, protein, and albumin occurred similarly in all groups. Mean (+/- SD) postoperative urine glucose values for day 1 after desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol were 1.4 +/- 3.0, 1.1 +/- 2.1, and 1.9 +/- 2.6 g/d (normal, < 0.5 g/d). The average daily protein/creatinine ratios for postoperative days 2-3 after desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol were 240 +/- 187, 272 +/- 234, and 344 +/- 243 (normal, < 150 mg/g). Regardless of anesthetic, there were significantly greater urine protein concentrations after surgical procedures in central versus peripheral regions. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in postoperative renal function were common and unrelated to the choice of anesthetic. These findings implicate nonanesthetic factors in producing changes in biochemical indices of renal excretory function.