Unmasking of the trigemino-accessory reflex in accessory facial anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible blink reflex responses in facial muscles reinnervated by the accessory nerve. METHOD: Eleven patients with a complete facial palsy were submitted to a surgical repair by an accessory facial nerve anastomosis (AFA). In this pathological group, blink reflex was studied by means of percutaneous electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve and recording from the orbicularis oculi muscle. A control group comprised seven normal people and seven patients with a complete Bell's facial palsy; in this group, responses on the sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) muscles were studied after supraorbital nerve stimulation. RESULTS: All the patients with AFA showed a consistent degree of facial reinnervation. Ten out of the 11 patients with AFA showed reflex responses; in six, responses were configured by a double component pattern, resembling the R1 and R2 components of the blink reflex; three patients had an R1-like response and one patient showed a unique R2 component. Mean values of latencies were 15.2 (SD 4.6) ms for the R1 and 85.3 (SD 9.6) ms for the R2. In the control group, eight out of 14 people had evidence of reflex responses in the SCM muscles; these were almost exclusively configured by a bilateral late component (mean latency 63.5 (SD15.9) ms) and only one of the subjects showed an early response at 11 ms. CONCLUSION: The trigemino-accessory reflex response in the pathological group was more complex and of a significantly higher incidence than in the control group. These differences could be tentatively explained by a mechanism of synaptic plasticity induced by the impairment of the efferent portion of the reflex. This could unmask the central linking between the trigeminal and the accessory limbs of the reflex. The findings described could be a demonstration of neurobionomic function in the repairing process of the nervous system.     

Alterations in excitatory and inhibitory brainstem interneuronal circuits in fibromyalgia: Evidence of brainstem dysfunction

ObjectivePatients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) perceive stimuli differently and show altered cortical sensory representation maps following peripheral stimulation. Altered sensory gating may play a causal role.MethodsBlink reflex, blink reflex excitability recovery, and prepulse inhibition of the blink reflex – representing brainstem excitability – were assessed in 10 female patients with FMS and 26 female healthy controls.ResultsUnconditioned blink reflex characteristics (R1 latency and amplitude, R2 and R2c latency and area-under-the-curve) did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Blink reflex excitability recovery was enhanced in patients versus controls at all intervals tested. Prepulses significantly suppressed R2 area and increased R2 latency in patients and controls. However, R2 area suppression was significantly less in patients than in controls (patients: to 80.0 ± 28.9%, controls: to 47.8 ± 21.7%). The general pattern of corresponding changes in R2c was similar.ConclusionsBlink reflex is normal, whereas blink reflex excitability recovery is enhanced and blink reflex prepulse inhibition is reduced in patients with FMS, suggesting functional changes at the brainstem level in FMS.SignificanceReduced blink reflex prepulse inhibition concurs with altered sensory gating in patients with FMS.     

Corneal reflex in normal and pathological subjects

The orbicularis oculi response can be evoked both by mechanical stimulation of the cornea (corneal reflex) and by electrical stimulation of the skin overlying the supraorbital nerve (blink reflex). Mechanical stimuli to the cornea activate A delta and C free nerve endings of the corneal mucosa. Electrical stimuli to the supraorbital nerve activate A beta, A delta and C fibers of the nerve trunk. Both reflexes present a bilateral late response, but the blink reflex shows in addition an early ipsilateral component (R1), which has never been observed with the corneal stimulation in man. We have developed a simple technique of electrical stimulation of the cornea which provides stable responses and allows precise measurements of threshold and latency of the reflex. In normal subjects, the threshold ranged from 50 to 350 microA, and the maximal stimulus that the subject could bear (tolerance level) ranged from 1000 to 2500 microA. The minimal latency to tolerance level stimuli was 39 +/- 3 msec. The latency difference between the direct responses evoked from the two opposite corneas never exceeded 8 msec and the difference between the direct and consensual responses elicited from the same cornea never exceeded 5 msec. An early ipsilateral component similar to the R1 response of the blink reflex was not observed, even with supramaximal stimulation. The electrically evoked corneal reflex was normal in 10 cases of essential trigeminal neuralgia, while the responses showed significant abnormalities in 18 subjects submitted to thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion as a treatment of neuralgic pain, as well as in 2 cases of symptomatic neuralgia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long‐term depression‐like plasticity of the blink reflex for the treatment of blepharospasm

Our previous work showed a beneficial therapeutic effect on blepharospasm using slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, which produces a long‐term depression (LTD)‐like effect. High‐frequency supraorbital electrical stimulation, asynchronous with the R2 component of the blink reflex, can also induce LTD‐like effects on the blink reflex circuit in healthy subjects. Patients with blepharospasm have reduced inhibition of their blink recovery curves; therefore, a LTD‐like intervention might normalize the blink reflex recovery (BRR) and have a favorable therapeutic effect. This is a randomized, sham‐controlled, observer‐blinded prospective study. In 14 blepharospasm patients, we evaluated the effects of high‐frequency supraorbital stimulation on three separate treatment days. We applied 28 trains of nine stimuli, 400 Hz, either before or after the R2 or used sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the blink rate, number of spasms rated by a blinded physician and patient rating before, immediately after and 1 hour after stimulation while resting, reading, and talking; secondary outcome was the BRR. Stimulation “before” and “after” the R2 both showed a similar improvement as sham stimulation in physician rating, but patients felt significantly better with the before condition. Improvement in recovery of the blink reflex was noted only in the before condition. Clinical symptoms differed in the three baseline conditions (resting, reading, and talking). Stimulation before R2 increased inhibition in trigeminal blink reflex circuits in blepharospasm toward normal values and produced subjective, but not objective, improvement. Inhibition of the blink reflex pathway by itself appeared to be insufficient for a useful therapeutic effect. © 2013 Movement Disorder Society     

Blink reflex role in algorithmic genetic testing of inherited polyneuropathies

Introduction: In severely affected inherited polyneuropathy patients, primary demyelination can be difficult to determine by routine extremity limb nerve conduction studies (NCS). Blink reflexes may help classify severe polyneuropathies as either axonal or demyelinating. However, blink reflex studies have not been studied systematically in any genetically confirmed cohort. Methods: Patients with a genetic diagnosis who had undergone blink reflex testing and extremity NCS were identified retrospectively. Blink reflex R1 latency, extremity NCS, and severity were compared. Results: We identified 26 demyelinating and 23 axonal, genetically confirmed cases, including 20 with PMP22 duplications. In 12 (25%), the ulnar CMAP amplitude was ≤0.5 mV making electrophysiological classification difficult. However, the R1‐latency cutoff of >13 ms (demyelinating) robustly classified all patients regardless of severity. Conclusions: We show that blink reflex studies are reliable for identification of inherited demyelinating polyneuropathy regardless of severity and can facilitate algorithmic decisions in genetic testing. Muscle Nerve 55 : 316–322, 2017     

Further evidence for a central reorganisation of synaptic connectivity in patients with hypoglossal-facial anastomosis in man

In normal subjects, electrical stimulation of trigeminal mucosal afferents (lingual nerve - V3) can elicit a short latency (12.5+/-0. 3 ms; mean+/-S.D.) reflex response in the ipsilateral genioglossus muscle (Maisonobe et al., Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in normal human subjects. Brain Res. 1998;810:220-228). In the present study on patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII-VII) nerve anastomoses, we were able to record similar R1-type blink reflex responses in the orbicularis oculi muscles, following stimulation of either supraorbital nerve (V1) or lingual nerve (V3) afferents. However, these responses were not present in normal control subjects. Voluntary swallowing movements produced clear-cut facilitations of the R1 blink reflex response elicited by stimulation of V1 afferents. In a conditioning-test procedure with a variable inter-stimulus interval, the R1 blink reflex response elicited by supraorbital nerve stimulation was facilitated by an ipsilateral mucosal conditioning stimulus in the V3 region. This facilitatory effect was maximal when the two stimuli (conditioning and test) were applied simultaneously. This effect was not observed on the R1 component of the blink reflex in the normal control subjects. These data strongly suggest that in patients with XII-VII anastomoses, but not in normal subjects, both cutaneous (V1) and mucosal (V3) trigeminal afferents project onto the same interneurones in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus. This clearly supports the idea that peripheral manipulation of the VIIth and the XIIth nerves induces a plastic change within this nucleus.     

Blink R1 latency utility in diagnosis and treatment assessment of polyradiculoneuropathy‐organomegaly‐endocrinopathy‐monoclonal protein‐skin changes and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Introduction: In polyradiculoneuropathy‐organomegaly‐endocrinopathy‐monoclonal protein‐skin changes (POEMS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), limb nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are limited in identifying demyelination and in detecting treatment effects in severely affected patients. Blink R1 latency may improve these assessments. Methods: POEMS and CIDP patients who had undergone NCS and blink reflex were identified. Correlations among R1 latency, limb NCS, and neuropathy impairment scores (NIS) were compared. Results: Among 182 patients (124 POEMS, 58 CIDP) who were identified, R1 prolongation (>13 ms) occurred in 64.3% (65.3% POEMS, 62.1% CIDP). R1 prolongation correlated with more severely affected NCS in both POEMS (ulnar CMAP 2.6 mV vs. 4.5 mV, P = 0.001) and CIDP (2.0 mV vs. 6.1 mV, P < 0.001). In severely affected patients (ulnar CMAP ≤0.5 mV [10%:18/182]), R1 (>13 ms) helped establish demyelination. In 31 patients (16 POEMS, 15 CIDP), the R1 latency changes were concordant with NIS changes in 94% of patients with POEMS and 60% of patients with CIDP. Discussion: Blink R1 latencies are valuable in defining demyelination and detecting improvement in severely affected POEMS and CIDP patients. Muscle Nerve 57 : E8–E13, 2018     

The corneal reflex and the R2 component of the blink reflex

A reflex contraction of the human orbicularis oculi muscles can be evoked by stimulation of either the supraorbital region ("blink reflex") or the cornea ("corneal reflex"). We found that the latency of the corneal reflex was longer, and the duration was longer than the R2 component of the blink reflex. The absolute refractory period of the R2 component of the blink reflex was longer after supraorbital than after corneal conditioning stimulation. When the R2 component of the blink reflex was habituated by repetitive stimuli, stimulation of the cornea still evoked a reflex, but supraorbital stimulation produced only a depressed R2 response. These findings suggest that the two reflexes do not have identical neural connections.     

The n10 component of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) is distinct from the R1 component of the blink reflex

ObjectiveBone-conducted vibration (BCV) in the midline at the hairline (Fz), results in short latency potentials recorded by surface electrodes beneath the eyes – the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP). The early negative component of the oVEMP, n10, is due to vestibular stimulation, however it is similar to the early R1 component of the blink reflex. Here we seek to dissociate n10 from R1.MethodsSurface potentials were recorded from the infraorbital electromyogram of 10 healthy subjects, 6 patients with bilateral vestibular loss, 2 with unilateral vestibular loss, 4 with facial palsy and 3 with facial and vestibular nerve lesions on the same side. BCV was delivered at Fz, the inion, the glabella or the supraorbital ridge using a tendon hammer or a bone-conduction vibrator.ResultsOnset latencies of the n10 evoked by taps at Fz or inion were significantly shorter than the R1 components of blink responses to supraorbital and glabellar stimuli. Upward gaze increased the amplitude of n10 but not R1. The n10 was absent bilaterally in patients with bilateral vestibular loss and beneath the contralesional eye in patients with unilateral vestibular loss, but in both these groups of patients R1 was preserved. In severe facial palsy the R1 component was absent or delayed and attenuated ipsilesionally, but n10 was preserved bilaterally. In subjects with unilateral facial and vestibular nerve lesions (Herpes Zoster of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves) the dissociation was complete – the ipsilesional R1 was absent or attenuated whereas the ipsilesional n10 was preserved.Conclusionsn10 is distinguished from R1 by its earlier onset, laterality, modulation by gaze position and dissociation in patient groups.SignificanceThe n10 component evoked by BCV at Fz is not the R1 component of the blink reflex.     

Blink reflex excitability cycle in hemifacial spasm

We studied electrically elicited blink reflex responses in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) by applying single isolated, as well as paired (conditioning and test), stimuli at both sides of the face. Responses after single stimuli were of larger size on the side of the spasm compared with the uninvolved side and controls. With paired stimuli, the inhibitory effect of the conditioning stimuli upon the test stimuli late response (R2), which was always observed in normals, was significantly less pronounced at short interstimuli intervals. This resulted in an enhanced recovery curve of R2, which was observed on the side of the spasm and the contralateral, clinically normal side. Patients with longer disease duration showed more striking abnormalities of the recovery curve. We suggest that there is enhanced excitability of facial motoneurons and of those brainstem interneurons that mediate the blink reflex pathway in patients with HFS.     

Electrophysiological evidence for crossed oligosynaptic trigemino-facial connections in normal man.

A crossed short latency component (R1) of the human blink reflex could be elicited in orbicularis oculi muscles to stimulation of the contralateral supraorbital nerve, when infraliminal conditioning stimuli were applied to various cutaneous afferents of the body (facial, upper and lower limbs). The crossed R1 responses appeared when the time interval between the conditioning and the test stimuli was of 30 to 40 ms, 50 to 65 ms and 95 to 110 ms for facial, upper and lower limbs afferents respectively. For the same time intervals, these conditioning volleys also exerted a facilitatory effect on the ipsilateral R1 responses. Furthermore, crossed R1 responses were also obtained during supraspinal facilitation induced by a voluntary contraction of the eyelids. These data show that crossed oligosynaptic trigemino-facial reflex connections exist in normal subjects, which become functional when adequate conditioning stimuli are available.     

Variability of the blink reflex in patients with migraine

Background and purposeSensitization of brainstem trigeminal nuclei and activation of the trigeminovascular system are thought to play an important role in migraine. The blink reflex has become a valuable tool for investigating trigeminal nerve function. The aim of the study was to assess the differences in electrophysiological examinations of the trigeminal nerve (blink reflex) in a group of patients with migraine in comparison with a healthy control group.Material and methodsThe examination was conducted among 58 patients. Patients were diagnosed in the Polyclinic or hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of Warsaw Medical University in Bielański Hospital. The study group included 29 patients suffering from migraine (diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2^nd edition) and 29 patients without headaches served as controls. All patients underwent neurological examination and magnetic resonance imaging to identify organic disorders. The blink reflex was tested among all patients in accordance with electrophysiological laboratory standards.ResultsThe latency of the R1 response was significantly shorter among patients with migraine. The latency of R2 and R2’ responses was similar in patients and controls. A significant inverse correlation was observed between latency of R2 and R2’ responses and frequency of migraine attacks.ConclusionsThe inverse correlation between the frequency of attacks and the latency of R2 and R2’ responses of the blink reflex confirms the abnormal eaxcitability induced by the high frequency of migraine attacks.     

Blink reflex in hemiplegia.

An electrophysiological study of the blink reflex was undertaken in 20 normal subjects and in 28 patients complaining of central facial palsy caused by unilateral hemispheral damage. In normal subjects, the latency, amplitude and organization of R1 and R2 responses are well known. Habituation of R2 responses occurred between 1 and 2 c/sec stimulation rate. R1 responses habituated at a higher stimulation rate (5 c/sec). In patients with unilateral hemispheral lesion, our results showed that changes in the blink reflex responses were bilateral. On the hemiplegic side the responses showed a decreased amplitude, while they were facilitated on the "normal" side. However, there was no change in latency of the two components of the reflex, on both sides. On the other hand, habituation of the late component occurred on the hemiplegic side for low stimulation rates: (0.5--1 c/sec), while on the "normal" side there was less habituation (3--4 c/sec), as compared with normal subjects. These results agree with those of experimental studies on cortical modulatory influences on brain-stem nuclei. They suggest a tactile origin of the two components of the blink reflex.     

The role of blink reflex R1 latency as an electrophysiological marker in diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy

ObjectiveStudies showed a relatively prolonged blink R1 latency in patients with diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) compared to that without DSPN. We tested the hypothesis that blink R1 latency would provide a diagnostic alternative to nerve conduction studies (NCS) in DSPN and act as a marker of the severity of NCS abnormalities in DSPN.MethodA total of 109 patients with type 2 diabetes underwent blink reflex studies and NCS. We used the composite amplitude scores of nerve conductions (CAS), which consisted of motor (tibial, peroneal and ulnar) and sensory (sural and ulnar) amplitudes for estimating the severity of NCS.ResultsPatients with DSPN had longer blink R1, R2, and contralateral R2 latencies (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.031, respectively) and higher CAS (P < 0.0001). Area under curve on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnosing occurrence of DSPN in blink R1 latency was 0.772 (P < 0.0001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that blink R1 latency was independently associated with CAS.ConclusionBlink R1 latency may be valuable in auxiliary diagnosis and in determining the severity of NCS abnormalities in DSPN.SignificanceBlink R1 latency can be added as a supplemental marker of severity of NCS in DSPN, especially if the patient’s sural amplitudes has a floor effect.     

Reflex arc of the first component of the human blink reflex: a single motoneurone study.

Latency variation of consecutive responses of single orbicularis oculi motoneurones in the first component of the electrically elicited blink reflex was 2.6 times larger than that of the H reflex of the soleus muscle fibres. Some motoneurones showed bimodal latency distribution or double responses or both at an interval of about 4-5 ms. Typical first component responses were sometimes obtained by contralateral stimulation. Central conduction time in the brainstem, estimated for 15 motoneurones, was between 2.4 and 6.6 ms. It is concluded that the first component of the blink reflex is conducted through an oligosynaptic arc including one or more interneurones.     

Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in normal human subjects

It has been shown that in patients in whom the central stump of the hypoglossal nerve has been anastomosed to the peripheral stump of a lesioned facial nerve, supraorbital nerve stimulation can elicit a short-latency reflex (12.5±0.6 ms; mean±S.D.) in facial muscles similar to the R1 disynaptic blink reflex response, but not followed by an R2 blink reflex component⁴⁶. Thus in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, these hypoglossal nerves contribute to a trigemino-hypoglossal reflex. The aim of this work was to study the type of reflex activities which can be elicited in both facial and tongue muscles by electrical stimulation of cutaneous (supraorbital nerve) or mucosal (lingual nerve) trigeminal (V) afferents in normal subjects. The results show that although stimulation of cutaneous V1 afferents elicits the well-known double component (R1–R2) blink reflex response in the orbicularis oculi muscles, it does not produce any detectable reflex response in the genioglossus muscle, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. Conversely, stimulation of mucosal V3 afferents can elicit a single reflex response of the R1 type in the genioglossus muscle but not in the orbicularis oculi muscles, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. These data are discussed in terms of two similar but separate circuits for the R1 responses of cutaneous (blink reflex) and mucosal (tongue reflex) origins. They suggest that in patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII–VII) nerve anastomosis, the short-latency trigemino-‘hypoglossal-facial' reflex of the R1 blink reflex type observed in facial muscles following supraorbital nerve stimulation could be due to changes in synaptic effectiveness of the central connectivity within the principal trigeminal nucleus where both cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents project.     

Neurophysiological evaluation of trigeminal and facial nerves in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Cranial neuropathy is clinically uncommon in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), but there is little information on the neurophysiological examination of cranial nerve involvement. To determine the incidence of trigeminal and facial nerve involvement in patients with CIDP, the direct response of the orbicularis oculi muscle to percutaneous electric stimulation of the facial nerve and the blink reflex (induced by stimulation of the supraorbital nerve) were examined in 20 CIDP patients. The latency of the direct response was increased in 12 patients (60%) and an abnormal blink reflex was observed in 17 patients (85%). There was no correlation between electrophysiological findings and the latencies of the direct and R1 responses and disease duration or clinical grade in CIDP patients. Nevertheless, the prevalence of subclinical trigeminal and facial neuropathy is extremely high in patients with CIDP when examined by neurophysiological tests.     

Familial congenital facial diplegia: electrophysiologic and genetic studies

A 13-year-old boy with autosomal-dominant congenital facial diplegia was evaluated by electrophysiologic and genetic investigations. Thirteen members of his family were affected over 4 generations. The electrophysiologic studies revealed blink reflex abnormalities. Both R1 and R2 responses were prolonged on the left side after ipsilateral stimulation, while R2 was also delayed by contralateral stimulation. Ipsilateral R1 and R2 were of normal latencies when the right side was stimulated. A third ipsilateral response at 63 msec of latency could be obtained when stimulating the left side. These findings suggest functional damage to the brainstem. Further support for this interpretation was provided by the prolonged time between waves I and V, bilaterally, documented by study of brainstem auditory evoked potentials.     

Optimized stimulation and recording parameters of human 'nociception specific' blink reflex recordings.

OBJECTIVE: Few non-invasive methods are available for studying trigeminal nociception in humans. The 'nociception specific' blink reflex (nBR) is elicited by a preferential stimulation of trigeminal nociceptive fibers and is highly sensitive to changes in trigeminal nociception. The aim of this study was to establish its optimal stimulation parameters. METHODS: The inter-individual variability of R2 responses (41 healthy subjects), symmetry of R2 responses after right vs. left sided stimulation (25 subjects), optimal stimulation parameters (3 groups, each 16 subjects) and re-test reliability over time (15 subjects) were studied. RESULTS: The nBR had a R2 response with a latency of 44.7+/-7.3ms, but no R1 response. The mean difference of R2 latencies (right vs. left sided stimulation) was 0.4+/-2.1(SD)ms, the mean ratio of the R2 response areas (RA) was 1.05+/-0.39 (SD). Thus, lateral differences of onset latencies greater than 4.6ms (0.4+4.2 (2SD)) or >1.83-fold (1.05+0.78 (2SD)) of RA can be assumed as outside of normal range. Long inter-block intervals of 7min minimized the cumulative habituation of R2 RAs to 23%, onset latencies remained constant. Re-test reliability over 4 weeks was high both for latencies (Crohnbach's alpha=0.85) and RAs (alpha=0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The nBR with the established stimulation parameters could be used for studying trigeminal nociception.     

Electrophysiological study of ephaptic axono-axonal responses in hemifacial spasm

One of the classic features of hemifacial spasm (HFS) is spread of the blink reflex responses to muscles other than the orbicularis oculi. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the generation of such abnormal responses include lateral spread of activity between neighboring fibers of the facial nerve and hyperexcitability of facial motoneurons. In this report we present evidence for another mechanism that can contribute to the generation of responses in lower facial muscles resembling the R1 response of the blink reflex. In 13 HFS patients, we studied the responses induced in orbicularis oris by electrical stimuli applied at various sites between the supraorbital and zygomatic areas. We identified responses with two different components: an early and very stable component, with an onset latency ranging from 10.5 to 14.8 ms, and a more irregular longer-latency component. Displacement of the stimulation site away from the supraorbital nerve and towards the extracranial origin of the facial nerve caused a progressive shortening of response latency. These features indicate that, in our patients, the shortest latency component of the orbicularis oris response was likely generated by antidromic conduction in facial nerve motor axons followed by axono-axonal activation of the fibers innervating the lower facial muscles. Our results suggest that motor axono-axonal responses are generated by stimulation of facial nerve terminals in HFS.