Laboratory diagnostic approach of the parents-children relationship in differentiating low-level von Willebrand factor from mild type 1 von Willebrand disease

The present study aimed to evaluate the parent-child relationship in differentiating between unaffected healthy individuals and those with von Willebrand disease (VWD). This study was performed on 15 children between the ages of 5 and 15 years and parents with personal and familial evidence of bleeding. Diagnosis of VWD as considered 'low von Willebrand factor (VWF) level or mild type 1 VWD' in the following children: those with low VWF levels (VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag between 30 and 50 U/dl), at least one bleeding symptom and a family member with at least one bleeding symptom. Laboratory values in the parents of families 1-7 were VWF:Ag 65-90, VWF:RCo 54-87, and FVIII:C 74-110, versus VWF:Ag 33-47, VWF:RCo 30-42, and FVIII:C 36-67 in their children. The normal laboratory values in the parents of families 1-7 suggested that their children would probably have low VWF levels. Our findings are that VWF levels are increasing with age. Laboratory values in the parents of families 8-15 were VWF:Ag 30-59, VWF:RCo 32-55, and FVIII:C 44-66, versus VWF:Ag 32-48, VWF:RCo 30-54, and FVIII:C 38-55 in their children. The laboratory values in the children from families 8-15 were close to the minimum range of normal or below normal, which suggested that it was possible that the parents and children in families 8-15 could be diagnosed as having mild type 1 VWD. The present study's findings show that comparison of the VWF levels in parents and their children may be helpful in differentiating children with low VWF levels and mild type 1 VWD from children that only have low VWF levels.     

Correlation between von Willebrand factor antigen,von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity and factor VIII activity in plasma

Background The laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) deficiencies includes qualitative and quantitative measurements of VWF and clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Since the FVIII activity is frequently normal in patients with mild type 1 or 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD), there is controversy whether FVIII testing should accompany VWF Antigen (VWF:Ag) assay. Methods The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between VWF:Ag, VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and FVIII in 213 consecutive patients undergoing screening for VWD. Results Forty-six patients were identified with VWF:Ag levels lower than the diagnostic threshold (54 IU/dl). A significant correlation was observed between VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo (r = 0.892; p < 0.001), VWF:Ag and FVIII (r = 0.834; p < 0.001), VWF:RCo and FVIII (r = 0.758; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the VWF:Ag assay revealed an area under the curve of 0.978 and 0.957 for detecting life-threatening values of FVIII (<30 IU/dl) and VWF:RCo (<40 IU/dl), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values at the VWF:Ag threshold value of 54 IU/dl were 100% and 33% for detecting life-threatening FVIII deficiencies, 94% and 80% for identifying abnormal values of VWF:RCo. Conclusions Due to the excellent correlation between VWF:Ag and FVIII and to the diagnostic efficiency of VWF:Ag for identifying abnormal FVIII levels in patients with VWF deficiency, routine measurement of FVIII may not be necessary in the initial screening of patients with suspected VWD. However, the limited negative predictive value of VWF:Ag for identifying type 2 VWD does not allow to eliminate VWF:RCo or VWF:FVIIIB assays from the diagnostic workout.     

Identifying carriers of type 2N von Willebrand disease: procedures and significance.

The defective FVIII carrier function of von Willebrand factor (VWF) identifies type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD), a variant with a pattern resembling hemophilia A. Type 2N characterization is based on the evaluation of the capacity of VWF to bind exogenous FVIII (VWF:FVIIIB). Here we report on a retrospective evaluation of hemostatic laboratory parameters most useful in detecting type 2N carriers. The diagnostic capacity of aPTT, FVIII, VWF:Ag, FVIII/VWF:Ag ratio, VWF:FVIIIB and VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag ratio was evaluated in 21 type 2N VWD carriers. Twenty subjects were heterozygous for the R854Q mutation, one was heterozygous for the R760C missense mutation, which interferes with cleavage of the VWF propeptide. We found that prolongation of aPTT and decrease in FVIII and FVIII/VWF:Ag ratio were not frequent findings in type 2N carriers. The same was true for VWF:FVIIIB which was not always abnormal. On the contrary, VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag ratio was always defective and its values were not related with FVIII and FVIII/VWF:Ag ratio or influenced by plasma VWF concentration. Given these results, we attribute the greatest significance to VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag ratio in the diagnosis of type 2N defects, and only search for type 2N mutations, to validate the diagnosis, if the ratio proves abnormal.     

Changes in von Willebrand factor level and von Willebrand activity with age in type 1 von Willebrand disease

In a normal population, VWF plasma levels (VWF:Ag) and VWF activity (VWF:RCo) increase by approximately 0.17 and 0.15 IU mL^?1 per decade, but the influence of age is unknown in patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD). In a retrospective cohort study, the medical records of 31 type 1 VWD patients over the age of 30, who had been followed for ≥5 years, were reviewed for baseline clinical data and previously performed VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and factor VIII levels (FVIII:C). VWF multimer analysis was normal in 28/31 cases performed. Mean age at diagnosis was 33 (range 16–60 years), and duration of follow‐up ranged from 5 to 26 years (mean 11 years). Patients had 2–10 time points of VWD testing (mean of 5.2). The mean VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII:C at time of diagnosis were 0.44 IU mL^?1 0.34 IU mL^?1 and 0.75 IU mL^?1. At last follow‐up, the mean VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII:C were significantly increased to 0.71 IU L^?1, 0.56 IU mL^?1 and 0.90 IU mL^?1 (P ≤ 0.001, <0.001, and 0.0081 respectively). Here 18/31 patients had VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII: C levels that increased into the normal range. The rate of change in VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII was 0.30 IU mL^?1 (0.21–0.39, CI 95%, P < 0.0001), 0.20 IU mL^?1 per decade (0.13–0.27, CI 95%, P = 0.0001) and 0.20 IU mL^?1 (0.11–0.29, CI 95%, P = 0.0011). Patients with type 1 VWD experience age‐related increases to VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo which can result in normalization of VWF levels. Further studies are required to determine if the bleeding phenotype resolves with the increases in VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels.     

Characterization of recessive severe type 1 and 3 von Willebrand Disease (VWD), asymptomatic heterozygous carriers versus bloodgroup O-related von Willebrand factor deficiency, and dominant type 1 VWD.

Recessive type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for two non-sense mutations (null alleles). Type 3 VWD is easy to diagnose by the combination of a strongly prolonged bleeding time (BT), absence of ristocetine-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) due to factor VIII:coagulant (FVIII:C) deficiency. VWD type 3 is associated with a pronounced tendency to mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal bleedings since early childhood. Carriers of one null allele are usually asymptomatic at VWF levels of 50% of normal. Recessive severe type 1 VWD is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for a missense mutation. Recessive type 1 VWD differs from type 3 VWD by the presence of detectable von Willebrand factor: antigen VWF:Ag and FVIII:C levels between 0.09 and 0.40 U/mL. Patients with recessive type 1 VWD show an abnormal VWF multimeric pattern in plasma and/or platelets consistent with severe type 2 VWD. Carriers of a missense mutation may have mild bleeding and mild VWF deficiency and can be diagnosed by a double VWF peak on cross immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). There will be cases of mild and moderate recessive type 1 VWD due to double heterozygosity of two missense mutations, or with the combination of one missense mutation with a non-sense or bloodgroup O. Mild deficiency of VWF in the range of 0.20 to 0.60 U/mL, with normal ratios of von Willebrand factor: ristocetine cofactor/antigen VWF:RCo/Ag and VWF:collagen binding/antigen (VWF:CB/Ag), normal VWF multimers, and a completely normal response to desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) with VWF level rising from below to above 1.00 U/mL are very likely cases of so-called pseudo-VWF deficiency in individuals with normal VWF protein and gene. Autosomal dominant type 1 VWD variants are in fact type 2 variants caused by a heterozygous missense mutation in the VWF gene that produces a mutant VWF protein that has a dominant effect on normal VWF protein produced by the normal VWF allele with regard to the synthesis, processing, storage, secretion, and/or proteolysis of VWF in endothelial cells. A DDAVP challenge test clearly differentiates between dominant type 1 VWD phenotype and dominant type 2 M VWD.     

Type 2N von Willebrand disease

Type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD) refers to patients with a factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency caused by a markedly decreased affinity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) for FVIII. It is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait but is clinically similar to mild hemophilia. The differential biologic diagnosis, which is of major importance for providing relevant genetic counseling and optimal treatment, is based on the measurement of plasma VWF capacity to bind FVIII. Molecular biology techniques have allowed the identification of 20 missense mutations in the VWF gene that cause type 2N VWD. All of them induce changes in amino acid residues located in the N-terminal part of mature VWF, which contains the FVIII binding site. Their identification may provide a genetic diagnosis. Theoretically, patients with type 2N VWD should be treated with products containing VWF that is able to stabilize their endogenous normal FVIII.     

Outgrowing the laboratory diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease: A two decade study

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels are known to increase with age in the general population, but that effect is unclear in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. Thus, it is important to assess the trends of VWF levels with age, and the extent and rate of their normalization in patients with VWD. In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of 126 patients between 1996 and 2016 who met the NHLBI diagnostic criteria for type 1 VWD or “Low VWF” (LVWF). We followed all their historically documented VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:RCo), and Factor VIII (FVIII) levels longitudinally over time, correlating data with clinical setting at time of testing. The average duration of follow‐up was 10.5 ± 3.7 years (SD). Out of the total study population, 27.8% achieved the primary outcome of complete normalization (CN) of both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels, including 19.6% and 32.5% of those with VWD and LVWF, respectively. Linear regression demonstrated statistically significant positive trends of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII with time, calculated at 2.4, 1.4, and 1.4 U dL‐1/year, respectively (P < .001 each). In the largest study population of VWD patients to date whose levels were followed longitudinally, there is a statistically significant rise in VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII levels observed with time. CN of both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels was observed in almost a third of patients with VWD or LVWF, over an average of 10 years. Whether the bleeding phenotype also improves is unclear and requires further study.     

Diagnosis of inherited von Willebrand disease: comparison of two methodologies and analysis of the discrepancies

Diagnostics of von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes assessment of factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), and more specific tests as multimeric and genetic analyses are necessary for the correct VWD classification. The ACL AcuStar? analyzer introduces chemiluminescence (CL) technology in detection of VWD with automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays. Compare VWF:Ag‐ELISA and VWF:RCo by aggregometry conventional assays with new CL VWF:Ag‐IL and VWF:RCo‐IL assays, investigate the ability to make accurate VWD diagnosis and concordance with multimeric and genetic analyses. 146 patients with congenital VWD (51 Type 1; 34 Type2A; 16 Type 2B; 31 Type 2M; 5 Type 2N; 9 Type 3) and 30 healthy normal subjects were included. A comparison was made between CL and conventional methods. Diagnostic evaluation included: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, multimeric distribution (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]‐agarose gel) of VWF and genetic analysis in 110 of 146 patients. CL and conventional methods revealed good correlation. Kappa test agreement diagnosis was >0.8. CL diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and specificity 97%. Multimeric and genetic analysis were of help in clarifying 13 discrepancies of diagnosis between methods, of which six discrepancies were explained by lack of conventional methods′ sensibility. CL methodology can detect VWD and discriminate between type 1, 3 and variant forms and offers an automated, faster, sensitive and less cumbersome method when compared to conventional assays, in particular VWF:RCo by aggregometry. In some cases, even with all phenotype and genetic analyses, discrepancies exist in the classification of VWD.     

Laboratory diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease in Turkey: Izmir experience

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by a deficiency or dysfunction of Von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, and management of VWD are relatively complex, but their understanding is important for proper diagnosis and management of patients with VWD. There are inherent difficulties in both the identification and classification of VWD because of clinical uncertainty and the limitations in the test processes and test panels typically used by laboratories. The most common test panel employed by laboratories, particularly in the geographic regions covered by the mutational studies, would comprise factor VIII coagulant (FVIII:C), VWF protein (antigen; VWF:Ag), and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). In our center, use of a desmopressin challenge with our core four-test panel (i.e., VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII:C, and PFA-100) is expected to further assist laboratory diagnosis of VWD in Turkey. Molecular genetics is a rather new approach for Turkey, with gene analyses related to VWD being initiated in one center and the results used for confirmation of diagnosis in limited cases.     

Assay of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) propeptide to identify patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease with decreased VWF survival

Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a partial quantitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Few VWF gene mutations have been identified that cause dominant type 1 VWD. The decreased survival of VWF in plasma has recently been identified as a novel mechanism for type 1 VWD. We report 4 families with moderately severe type 1 VWD characterized by low plasma VWF:Ag and FVIII:C levels, proportionately low VWF:RCo, and dominant inheritance. A decreased survival of VWF in affected individuals was identified with VWF half-lives of 1 to 3 hours, whereas the half-life of VWF propeptide (VWFpp) was normal. DNA sequencing revealed a single (heterozygous) VWF mutation in affected individuals, S2179F in 2 families, and W1144G in 2 families, neither of which has been previously reported. We show that the ratio of steady-state plasma VWFpp to VWF:Ag can be used to identify patients with a shortened VWF half-life. An increased ratio distinguished affected from unaffected individuals in all families. A significantly increased VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio together with reduced VWF:Ag may indicate the presence of a true genetic defect and decreased VWF survival phenotype. This phenotype may require an altered clinical therapeutic approach, and we propose to refer to this phenotype as type-1C VWD.     

Comorbidities associated with higher von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels may explain the age‐related increase of VWF in von Willebrand disease

Some comorbidities, such as hypertension, are associated with higher von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels in the general population. No studies have been conducted to assess this association in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Therefore, we studied this association in patients with type 1 (n = 333) and type 2 (n = 203) VWD from the ‘WiN” study. VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) was higher in type 1 VWD patients with hypertension [difference: 0·23 iu/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0·11–0·35], diabetes mellitus (0·11 iu/ml, 95% CI: −0·02 to 0·23), cancer (0·14 iu/ml, 95% CI: 0·03–0·25) and thyroid dysfunction (0·14 iu/ml, 95% CI: 0·03–0·26) than in patients without these comorbidities (all corrected for age, sex and blood group). Similar results were observed for VWF collagen binding capacity (VWF:CB), VWF activity as measured by the VWF monoclonal antibody assay (VWF:Ab) and factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity (FVIII:C). In type 1 VWD, age was associated with higher VWF:Ag (0·03 iu/ml; 95% CI: 0·01–0·04), VWF:CB (0·02 iu/ml; 95% CI: 0·00–0·04), VWF:Ab (0·04 iu/ml; 95% CI: 0·02–0·06) and FVIII:C (0·03 iu/ml; 95% CI: 0·01–0·06) per decade increase. After adjustment for relevant comorbidities, these associations were no longer significant. Despite the higher VWF and FVIII levels, type 1 VWD patients with comorbidities had more bleeding episodes, particularly during surgery. There was no association between comorbidities and VWF/FVIII levels or bleeding phenotype in type 2 VWD patients. In conclusion, comorbidities are associated with higher VWF and FVIII levels in type 1 VWD and may explain the age‐related increase of VWF and FVIII levels.     

Intravenous DDAVP and factor VIII-von Willebrand factor concentrate for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleedings in patients With von Willebrand disease type 1, 2 and 3.

The current standard set of von Willebrand factor (VWF) parameters used to differentiate type 1 from type 2 VWD include bleeding times (BTs), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetine cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF collagen binding activity (VWF:CB), ristocetine induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), and analysis of VWF multimers in low and high resolution agarose gels and the response to DDAVP. The BTs and RIPA are normal in asymptomatic carriers of a mutant VWF allele, in dominant type 1, and in recessive type 2N VWD, and this category has a normal response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The response of FVIII:C is compromised in type 2N VWD. The BTs and RIPA are usually normal in type Vicenza and mild type 2A VWD, and these two VWD variants show a transiently good response of BT and VWF parameters followed by short in vivo half life times of VWF parameters. The BTS are strongly prolonged and RIPA typically absent in recessive severe type 1 and 3 VWD, in dominant type 2A and in recessive type 2C (very likely also 2D) VWD and consequently associated with low or absent platelet VWF, and no or poor response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA increased in dominant type 2B VWD, that is featured by normal platelet VWF and a poor response of BT and functional VWF to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA decreased in dominant type 2A and 2U, that all have low VWF platelet, very low VWF:RCo values as compared to VWF:Ag, and a poor response of functional VWF to DDAVP. VWD type 2M is featured by the presence of all VWF multimers in a low resolution agarose gel, normal or slightly prolonged BT, decreased RIPA, a poor response of VWF:RCo and a good response of FVIII and VWF:CB to DDAVP and therefore clearly in between dominant type 1 and 2U. The existing recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of bleedings in type 2 VWD patients with FVIII/VWF concentrates are mainly derived from pharmocokinetic studies in type 3 VWD patients. FVIII/VWF concentrates should be characterised by labelling with FVIII:C, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB and VWF multimeric pattern to determine their safety and efficacy in prospective management studies. As the bleeding tendency is moderate in type 2 and severe in type 3 VWD and the FVIII:C levels are near normal in type 2 and very low in type 3 VWD patients. Proper recommendations of FVIII/VWF concentrates using VWF:RCo unit dosing for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes are proposed and has to be stratified for the severity of bleeding, the type of surgery either minor or major and for type 2 and type 3 VWD as well.     

Type 2N von Willebrand disease: Characterization and diagnostic difficulties

Introduction

An abnormal factor VIII (FVIII) binding capacity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) identifies type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD). Type 2N VWD patients are identified by means of the VWF FVIII binding (VWF:FVIIIB) assay, and especially their VWF:FVIIIB/VWF:Ag ratio (VWF:FVIIIB ratio).

Aim

We report on our 15‐year experience of diagnosing type 2N VWD.

Methods

We have performed 2178 VWF:FVIIIB assays in bleeders and normal subjects.

Results

von Willebrand factor (VWF):FVIIIB was reduced in 682, but only 60 had low VWF:FVIIIB ratios (<0.74). Among nine patients who had a VWF:FVIIIB ratio below 0.3, four had normal VWF levels and were homozygotes for the p.R854Q mutation; the other five had low VWF levels due to a quantitative VWF mutation combined with p.R854Q. The VWF:FVIIIB ratio ranged between 0.3 and 0.73 in 51 subjects; 34 of them were heterozygotes for the p.R854Q mutation, while one carried the p.R760C. The heterozygotes for type 2N included subjects with or without bleeding symptoms, the former with significantly lower mean VWF levels than the latter. Among the 116 normal subjects tested, six were heterozygotes for the p.R854Q mutation (all asymptomatic).

Conclusions

The prevalence of type 2N in our VWD cohort was 2.5%, and 5.2% of the general population in Northeast Italy was found heterozygous for the p.R854Q mutation. It might be difficult to reveal a type 2N defect using routine tests alone, especially when it is combined with a quantitative VWF mutation. Accordingly, we always recommend VWF:FVIIIB assay in the diagnostic workup of VWD.     

Bleeding symptoms and laboratory correlation in patients with severe von Willebrand disease

Summary.  Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a rare bleeding disorder with markedly decreased or absent von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, accompanied by a parallel decrease in VWF function and factor VIII (FVIII) activity. The goal of this study was to describe the population of patients enrolled in the USA Centers for Disease Control Universal Data Collection (UDC) study with type 3 VWD, defined as a VWF:Ag of <10%, and to correlate bleeding symptoms with VWF and FVIII levels. Data on 150 patients were analysed. Almost all patients experienced bleeding episodes (98%) and required blood and/or factor product treatment (92%). While oral mucosal bleeding (the site of first bleed in 54%) was most common, subsequent muscle and joint bleeds were also seen (28%, 45%, respectively), and intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 8% of individuals. Mean age of first bleed was lower in those with either a FVIII ≤5% or a VWF:Ag <1%. Univariate marginal model analysis showed lower levels of FVIII and VWF:Ag both predicted a higher risk of joint bleeding. Longitudinal multivariate analysis found a lower FVIII level ( P  = 0.03), increasing age ( P  < 0.0001), history of joint bleeding ( P  = 0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) ( P  < 0.0001), and use of home infusion ( P  = 0.02) were all negatively associated with joint mobility. Low levels of VWF:Ag ( P  = 0.003) and male sex ( P  = 0.007) were also negatively associated with joint function. This study documents the strong bleeding phenotype in severe VWD and provides data to help target therapy, including prophylaxis, for patients most at risk of bleeding complications.     

Utility of the von Willebrand factor collagen binding assay in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and also arises as an acquired defect (AVWS). VWD and AVWS are due to quantitative deficiencies and/or qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF), an adhesive plasma protein with multiple activities. Diagnosis of VWD is problematic, being subject to overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. This is largely due to limitations in current test procedures and an over‐reliance on these imperfect test systems for clinical diagnosis. VWF essentially acts to assist in the formation of a platelet thrombus to stop blood loss from sites of injury, achieving this by binding to platelets (primarily through the glycoprotein Ib receptor), binding to subendothelial matrix components (primarily collagen), and binding to factor VIII (FVIII), thus protecting FVIII from degradation and enabling its delivery to sites of vascular injury. VWD is classified into six separate types, which may each be differentially managed therapeutically, and this underscores the importance of a correct diagnosis. The current report concisely reviews the utility of a relatively underutilised assay, the VWF collagen binding assay (VWF:CB), in facilitating the correct diagnosis and typing of VWD. In particular, if laboratories do not utilise the VWF:CB, then (i) type 2M VWD will continue to be missed, and/or misdiagnosed as types 2A or 1 VWD, and (ii) types 2A, 2B and PT‐VWD will continue to be missed, or else be misdiagnosed as type 1 VWD or ITP. Am. J. Hematol. 92:114–118, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A comparative in vitro evaluation of six von Willebrand factor concentrates

The efficacy of von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates for treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is dependent on their content of VWF and factor VIII (FVIII). STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure the content and quality of VWF and FVIII in six VWF concentrates: Haemate-P (Aventis Behring), Immunate (Baxter Bioscience), Koate (Bayer Corp.), 8Y (BPL), Innobrand (LFB) and Facteur Willebrand (LFB). METHODS: The VWF antigen content (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), collagen-binding activity (VWF:CB), VWF multimers with electrophoresis and densitometry, FVIII activity and total protein content. RESULTS: Specific activity (VWF:RCo/total protein) varied considerably (4.7-129.5 IU mg(-1)). Activity measures, VWF:RCo and VWF:CB, correlated well, but we found no correlation between any of these and VWF:Ag. The content of high-molecular weight multimer (HMWM) was normal or close to normal in Haemate-P, Innobrand and Facteur Willebrand, moderately reduced in Koate and 8Y, and significantly reduced in Immunate. The HMWM content correlated significantly with the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio. Only Haemate-P, Innobrand and Facteur Willebrand had VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios >0.7. We found large differences in the content of FVIII and in the FVIII/VWF:RCo ratio. Facteur Willebrand had the lowest (0.02) and Immunate the highest (6.00) ratio. CONCLUSION: Treating physicians must be aware of the large differences between different VWF concentrates and the potential clinical implications. Concentrates lacking HMWM are probably less efficient for mucosal bleedings. FVIII is most important for surgical bleedings, but concentrates with high FVIII/VWF-ratio may induce very high FVIII levels with increased risk of thrombosis. A low FVIII content may be preferable except in case of acute surgery.     

Von Willebrand Disease Lab Diagnosis

The hemorrhagic diseases are characterized by bleeding which can vary considerably according to their severity. The von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent hereditary hemorrhagic disease and the prevalence of clinically significant disease is probably closer to 1:1000, being an extremely heterogeneous and complex disorder that is related to the deficiency in concentration, structure or function of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The VWD is divided into type 1, with partial deficiency of the VWF, type 2, with qualitative defects in the molecule with four subdivisions, and type 3, with very low or undetectable levels of plasma and platelet VWF and ristocetin cofactor activity. The laboratory diagnosis of VWD is complex. Specific tests that assess the functionality and concentrations of the VWF and FVIII are needed. The routine tests are the bleeding time, the activated partial thromboplastin time and the platelet count, however, singly, they may not suggest the diagnosis of VWD, requiring further specific tests, such as VWF function evaluation through its ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), VWF protein concentration immunoassay (VWF:Ag), the factor VIII coagulation assay (FVIII:C), VWF binding to immobilized collagen (VWF:CB), ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), VWF multimers patterns, factor VIII binding of immobilized VWF (VWF:FVIIIB), among others. From the moment the diagnosis is confirmed, the appropriate treatment for each patient is sought, with the purpose of increasing plasma concentrations of the deficient protein, both in bleeding episodes, as for invasive procedures. Although diagnosis facilitates treatment other approach in the present scenario is prenatal diagnosis which, is the need of the hour.     

Measurement of von Willebrand factor-FVIII binding activity in patients with suspected von Willebrand disease type 2N: application of an ELISA-based assay in a reference laboratory

Summary.  Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease type 2N (VWD2N) is based on costly mutation analysis or in vitro measurement of the ability of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind exogenous factor VIII (FVIII); however, the VWF-FVIII binding activity assay is complex and not widely used. Our aim was to assess the utility of the in-house VWF-FVIII binding assay in the investigation of patients with suspected VWD2N. A previously described ELISA-based FVIII binding method was simplified and adapted for the clinical laboratory use by optimizing incubation time, reagent concentrations and assay standardization. The assay was validated using samples from eight individuals with known homozygous or heterozygous VWD2N mutations, and 100 healthy adults. An additional 392 patient samples were tested, including 314 with FVIII activity <50% of normal and 78 received for routine VWF-FVIII binding activity testing. Intra- and inter-assay variations were less than 10% and 17%, respectively, and the limit of quantification was estimated as 0.12. The reference range for healthy adults was 0.73–1.42. VWF:FVIII binding activity was consistent with the genotype in subjects with available genetic data, being low in three individuals with homozygous mutation (<0.12) and intermediate in five heterozygous individuals (0.44–0.61). Screening of the 392 clinical samples identified reduced VWF:FVIII binding in 19 subjects. This assay provides accurate measurement of VWF:FVIII binding activity and successfully identifies homozygous VWD2N patients and heterozygous carriers. Use of this ELISA-based assay may help avoid the need for mutation analysis in patients with unexplained low FVIII activity.     

Similarity in joint and mucous bleeding syndromes in type 2N von Willebrand disease and severe hemophilia A coexisting with type 1 von Willebrand disease in two Chinese pedigrees

In this study, we investigated the molecular basis of two unrelated Chinese patients with hemostatic disorders. The proband of the first family had severe hemophilia A (HA) coexisting with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) and the proband of the second family had type 2N VWD. Both probands had similar phenotypes, which included joint and mucosal bleeding, very low factor VIII (FVIII) activity (FVIII:C), and moderate reductions in VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:Rco), as well as a normal multimeric pattern. One FVIII mutation and three VWF mutations were identified: FVIII p.R446* and VWF heterozygous p.E216K mutations were detected in proband 1 and compound heterozygosity of VWF mutations (p.R816W and c.1911delC) in proband 2. Transient expression studies in HEK293T cells proved that R816W mutation abolished the binding of FVIII to VWF and slightly impaired protein synthesis and secretion; 1911delC mutation mainly impaired VWF protein synthesis and secretion. These results provided insight into the possible pathogenic mechanism of type 2N VWD in Chinese patients carrying these mutations.