Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the likelihood of occult cancer diagnosis at prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in different age groups and to determine the histopathology of these lesions. METHODS: We describe a series of 159 female BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy at the University Health Network, Toronto from January 1, 1992 to June 30, 2004. RESULTS: Seven (4.4%) occult cancers were detected at pathologic examination. None of the 159 subjects had clinical signs or symptoms of ovarian carcinoma prior to, or at the time of, surgery. Only two cancers were grossly visible at surgery. There were 94 BRCA1 carriers, of whom six were found to have an occult cancer (6.4%). In contrast, only one of the 65 BRCA2 carriers was found to have an occult cancer (1.5%). Three of the seven cases of occult malignancy involved the fallopian tube and not the ovaries. CONCLUSION: Approximately 6% of BRCA1 carriers and 2% of BRCA2 carriers who undergo prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy will be found to have occult carcinomas if the ovaries and tubes are rigorously examined. A significant proportion of these appear to originate in the fallopian tube. No cancers were detected among women who had the operation at age 39 or younger.     

Occult cancer of the fallopian tube in a BRCA2 germline mutation carrier at prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy

BACKGROUND: Women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have a significantly increased risk of developing ovarian cancer compared with women in the general population and may consider bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy as a risk-reducing option. CASE: We report a case of occult fallopian tube cancer diagnosed at prophylactic surgery in a patient with a BRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: This report acts as a reminder of the importance of removing as much of the fallopian tube as possible during prophylactic surgery in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and of the need for careful pathological examination of surgical specimens after surgery.     

Additional salpingectomy after previous prophylactic oophorectomy in high-risk women: sense or nonsense?

OBJECTIVES: Since BRCA1/2 germ line mutation carriers are also at a higher risk of developing fallopian tube carcinoma, resection of the fallopian tubes is currently included at the time of risk reducing surgery. In this study, we comment on the need of additional bilateral prophylactic salpingectomy (BPS) following previous bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy (BPO) in women at high risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS: Retrospectively, the medical files of 42 high-risk women, who had undergone BPO only, were reviewed. RESULTS: In our center, risk-reducing surgery consisted of BPO only for 42 women. Twenty-seven women received an informative letter in which counseling for additional BPS was offered. In total, 15 women opted for additional BPS. Surgery was performed with a mean interval of 65 months (range 6-101) in 10 BRCA1 carriers, one BRCA2 carrier, one BRCA1 and 2 carrier, and three women with non-informative test results. The procedure was readily done by laparoscopy in 13 women and two needed a laparotomy. No post-operative complications had occurred. Histopathological examination revealed no malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that additional risk reduction of cancer necessitates BPS in BRCA1/2 carriers after previous BPO. BPS after previous BPO was easily performed. Today, physicians should include resection of the fallopian tube at prophylactic surgery in high-risk women and should consider additional BPS in women who have undergone BPO only.     

A genetic epidemiological study of carcinoma of the fallopian tube

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the importance of genetic factors in the etiology of fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: All pathologically confirmed cases of fallopian tube cancer diagnosed in Ontario from 1990 to 1998 were identified from the records of the Ontario Cancer Registry. Living patients were approached to provide information about their family history and to provide a blood sample for testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. RESULTS: A modest increase in the risk of ovarian cancer (relative risk (RR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.4, 6.3) and of early-onset breast cancer (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 0.6, 6.1) was observed in the first-degree relatives of the fallopian cancer cases. Five of the forty-four cases were positive for a mutation in BRCA1 (11%) and two were positive for a BRCA2 mutation (5%). Five of eighteen women diagnosed at or before age 55 were positive (28%). Two of the seven mutation carriers had a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer, and three carriers had a modest family history. Three of the forty-four cases were Jewish, and of these, two carried a founder mutation characteristic of this population. CONCLUSIONS: Fallopian tube carcinoma should be considered to be a clinical component of the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, and may be associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Genetic evaluation should be offered to women who present with fallopian tube carcinoma. It is important to consider the risk of fallopian tube carcinoma when prophylactic oophorectomy is performed in high-risk women.     

The founder mutation BRCA1c.2845insA identified in a fallopian tube cancer patient: a case report

Abstract.   Damayanti Z, Ali AB, Iau PTC, Ilancheran A, Sng JH. The founder mutation BRCA1 c.2845insA identified in a fallopian tube cancer patient: a case report. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16(Suppl. 1): 362–365.
Fallopian tube carcinoma is a very rare tumor, comprising less than 1% of all gynecologic cancers and found primarily in postmenopausal women. With the disease being so uncommon, little is known about its causes and/or risk factors, and treatment approaches have been taken from experiences with ovarian cancer. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman with fallopian tube cancer in which the founder mutation BRCA1 c.2845insA was detected by mutational analysis. This same mutation was subsequently detected in four unaffected members of her family following genetic counseling. We report an association between this founder mutation and fallopian tube cancer as part of the hereditary breast cancer syndrome in an Asian population. A literature review of the association between this rare malignancy and BRCA mutation carriers and its implications to prophylactic surgery is discussed.     

Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic surgical removal of the ovaries has been offered for many years as a potential preventative of ovarian cancer in women deemed to be at increased hereditary risk for this disease. Now, it is possible to test for specific mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes that render members of hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families susceptible to cancer. Widespread intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, which mimics metastatic ovarian serous carcinoma, has been reported following oophorectomy in individuals at increased hereditary risk. This study was undertaken to examine and report particularly the occurrence of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, as well as other cancers, following prophylactic oophorectomy in patients who carry cancer susceptibility mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and to assess the cumulative risks for this disease in order to assist in developing appropriate surgical interventions, based on currently available information, and to counsel patients who choose prophylactic surgery, concerning the potential prognosis, thereafter. METHODS: The Creighton University Hereditary Cancer Institute registry was searched for members of HBOC syndrome families who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy. The histories and results of DNA testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carried in their families were recorded, tabulated and examined, and the aggregate data are reported along with pertinent details of those individuals who developed neoplastic diseases after prophylactic oophorectomy. All available histologic and cytologic materials of patients who were diagnosed with intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were reviewed, and life-table calculations were performed to assess cumulative risks for this disease following prophylactic oophorectomy. RESULTS: From 72 HBOC syndrome families that carried either BRCA1 or BRCA2 cancer-associated mutations, 238 individuals who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy were recorded in our registry between January 1985 and December 2002. During a mean follow-up of 9.3 years, cancers were diagnosed in 27 subjects, including 16 individuals with breast cancer and five patients with intra-abdominal carcinomatosis. Breast cancers were stage I in 10 of 12 proven carriers of cancer-associated mutations. All five cases of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were serous carcinomas, and all occurred in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Histologic review of the prophylactically removed ovaries found borderline lesions in two cases, one with possible early stromal invasion. Two of the five patients who developed intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were among 78 patients in this series who were diagnosed and treated for breast cancer before prophylactic oophorectomy. A 3.5% cumulative risk for all mutation carriers and a 3.9% cumulative risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers were calculated through 20 years of follow-up after prophylactic oophorectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in our series was diagnosed only in BRCA1 mutation carriers. The calculated cumulative risks of developing intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in members of HBOC syndrome families, specifically those who carry deleterious mutations, are well below the estimated risks of ovarian cancer published in the literature for similar patients. Breast cancers, which tended to be small and localized, were the most common malignancy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after prophylactic oophorectomy.     

The risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of ovarian cancer after a primary diagnosis of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and to identify host and treatment-related factors that might modify the risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 491 women with stage I or stage II breast cancer, diagnosed from 1975 to 2000 and for whom a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had been identified. Patients were followed from the initial diagnosis of breast cancer until either ovarian cancer, prophylactic oophorectomy, death, or 2002. The medical treatment records and pathology documents were reviewed. Information that was abstracted from the medical charts included date of breast cancer diagnosis, stage of disease, use of chemotherapy, use of radiation therapy, usage of tamoxifen, oophorectomy, recurrence, second malignancy, and vital status. RESULTS: The 10-year actuarial risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer was 12.7% for BRCA1 carriers and 6.8% for BRCA2 carriers (P = 0.03). The use of tamoxifen (OR = 1.79; P = 0.16) and chemotherapy (OR = 0.59; P = 0.15) did not significantly impact on the risk of subsequent ovarian cancer. Twenty-five percent of the deaths in women with stage I breast cancer were due to a subsequent ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of ovarian cancer suggests that oophorectomy should be recommended in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with a diagnosis of breast cancer, especially those with stage I disease. Breast cancer systemic therapy did not significantly alter the risk of ovarian cancer.     

Occult fallopian tube cancer in a patient with BRCA1 breast cancer

Primary fallopian tube cancer is very rare form of ovarian cancer. However, despite the infrequent incidence, emerging evidence suggests that patients who have a deleterious mutation of BRCA1 or -2 mutation may be more vulnerable to developing this disease. A patient with breast carcinoma was initially treated for her disease in 1994. She had a new primary lesion on the contralateral side in 2001 and was eventually identified with a positive BRCA1 germline mutation in 2007. The patient subsequently underwent a laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy surgery performed by her gynecologist. Final pathology revealed occult stage IIC fallopian tube cancer with bilateral ovarian serosal involvement. Consequently, the patient was referred to gynecologic oncology and underwent a pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic omentectomy, followed by chemotherapy. Although fallopian tube cancer is rare, women who are positive for the BRCA mutation are at greater risk for developing this disease. Therefore, physicians should consider the associated risk factors and perform comprehensive risk-reducing surgery and staging when treating these patients.     

BRCA-mutation-associated fallopian tube carcinoma: a distinct clinical phenotype?

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and histologic features between fallopian tube cancers in women with germline BRCA mutations and sporadic cases. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with fallopian tube cancer had BRCA mutation testing using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and protein truncation testing. Histologic slides were reviewed by 2 pathologists, and immunohistochemical staining for p53, ki67, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor was performed on carcinomas and dysplastic and benign tubal epithelia. RESULTS: Twelve of 28 (43%) women had BRCA mutations: 11 BRCA1, 1 BRCA2. Excluding 4 cases found at prophylactic surgery, the median age of diagnosis of BRCA mutation carriers was 57 years compared with 65 years among sporadic cases (P = .09). Patients with BRCA-associated fallopian tube cancer had a median survival time of 68 months compared with 37 months when compared with sporadic cases (P = .14). Both groups had predominantly advanced stage, high grade, serous fallopian tube cancers. No patient had exclusively proximal disease. Occult fallopian tube cancer diagnosed at prophylactic surgery in BRCA mutation carriers was exclusively distal. "Skip" areas of high-grade dysplasia were only seen in 2 patients, both of whom were BRCA mutation carriers. There were no differences in the immunohistochemical staining for p53, ki67, estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor in carcinomas and dysplastic or benign epithelia of patients with or without BRCA mutations. Overexpression of p53 was commonly seen in fallopian tube cancers and dysplastic epithelium, but rarely noted in benign epithelium. CONCLUSION: Fallopian tube cancer is part of the BRCA mutation phenotype and seems to share many clinical features with sporadic fallopian tube cancers, including no exclusively proximal disease. The presentation of BRCA-associated fallopian tube cancers may, however, occur at a younger age and have an improved survival.     

Attitudes toward preventive oophorectomy among BRCA1 mutation carriers in Poland

Currently genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 susceptibility genes is performed throughout Europe and North America. In Poland three founder mutations in BRCA1 account for 14% of all invasive ovarian cancers and oophorectomy is frequently recommended to mutation carriers as a preventive measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate patient acceptance of the recommendation for prophylactic oophorectomy in a hereditary cancer clinic. Seventy-two women over the age of 40 and who carried a BRCA1 mutation were advised to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy. After a mean follow-up period of 19 months, 43 of the women (60%) had undergone the procedure. Of the 29 women who had not had an oophorectomy, five indicated that they did not intend to do so, 19 indicated that they intended to have the operation in the near future and five were undecided. In conclusion, preventive oophorectomy is acceptable to most Polish women at high risk of hereditary ovarian cancer and should be among the range of services offered in cancer genetics clinics.     

Atypical epithelial proliferation in fallopian tubes in prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy specimens from BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation carriers.

Although growing numbers of tubal carcinomas in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations have been reported, very little is known about the nature and frequency of their possible precursor lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the occurrence of atypical proliferative tubal lesions in grossly normal fallopian tubes from 26 women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations who underwent prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and whose ovaries were histologically negative for carcinoma. Fallopian tubes from 49 women who had undergone hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine leiomyoma served as controls. In the 22 BRCA1-mutated women, there were two in situ carcinomas and two atypical hyperplasias of the tubal epithelium. The tubes of the BRCA2-mutated women and of the 49 control women did not show any atypical proliferation. The frequency of proliferative lesions of the tubal epithelium, including in situ carcinoma, appears to be increased in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Removal and thorough examination of the fallopian tubes at the time of surgical prophylaxis for ovarian cancer is therefore recommended.     

Occult cancer of the fallopian tube in BRCA-1 germline mutation carriers at prophylactic oophorectomy: a case for recommending hysterectomy at surgical prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE: BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 germline mutations increase the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Primary cancer of the fallopian tube is rare; however, recent evidence suggests that patients harboring a germline mutation conferring an increased risk of ovarian cancer may be at risk for fallopian tube cancer as well. We discuss the finding of occult fallopian tube cancer diagnosed at surgical prophylaxis in women harboring BRCA-1 mutations. METHODS/RESULTS: Two patients undergoing surgical prophylaxis to address an increase in ovarian cancer risk were discovered to harbor occult primary fallopian tube carcinoma on final pathology review. Mutational analysis confirmed the presence of a deleterious mutation in BRCA-1 in both patients. CONCLUSION: Currently, consensus opinions regarding ovarian cancer surgical prophylaxis in gene mutation carriers do not include hysterectomy as part of the preventative procedure. This report as well as a growing number of cases of fallopian tube cancer reported in known BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutation carriers has important implications for recommendations regarding surgical prophylaxis in these women.     

Peritoneal lavage cytology: an assessment of its value during prophylactic oophorectomy

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) is an accepted treatment strategy for women who are at high risk for the development of ovarian carcinoma, particularly women who are BRCA mutation-positive. This study sought to assess the utility of peritoneal lavage cytology at the time of PO in detecting occult malignancy in this group of patients. METHODS: Thirty-five high-risk women, who were not suspected of having any malignancy or ovarian mass, underwent peritoneal lavage at the time of PO. Thirty-one of the thirty-five women had undergone BRCA mutation analysis (BRCA1+, 18; BRCA2+, 10; BRCA-, 3). Intensive histopathologic examination was used in all 35 cases to identify occult carcinoma. Lavage specimens were reviewed for the presence of malignant cells and endosalpingiosis. The cytologic review was conducted without knowledge of either the histopathologic or BRCA results. RESULTS: In 32 of the 35 lavage specimens no malignancy was detected. In the remaining three cases malignant cells were detected; in two of these cases histopathologic examination confirmed an ovarian/tubal occult carcinoma. Two of these women were BRCA1 mutation positive. Endosalpingiosis was detected in the peritoneal lavage specimens of 7 of the 32 cases showing no evidence of malignancy. All of these 7 women were BRCA mutation positive or unknown. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal lavage cytology can detect occult carcinoma at the time of PO and should be performed at PO. The significance of occult carcinoma detected by either histopathologic or cytopathologic examination is uncertain. Whether the prevalence of endosalpingiosis detectable by lavage cytology is increased in BRCA mutation-positive patients requires further study.     

A cautious view of putative precursors of serous carcinomas in the fallopian tubes of BRCA mutation carriers

Objective

To compare the frequency and distribution of candidate precursors of serous carcinoma in the fallopian tubes of BRCA mutation carriers to BRCA non-mutation carriers (controls) at risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO).

Methods

78 BRCA carriers (52 BRCA1, 26 BRCA2) and 23 controls underwent RRSO. Fallopian tubes were serially cross-sectioned, and adnexa were entirely submitted and examined by two gynecologic pathologists blinded to BRCA mutation status. The presence and location of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), p53 overexpression (≥ 6 consecutively stained nuclei), Ki67 overexpression, atypia/low grade dysplasia and epithelial hyperplasia were compared between BRCA carriers and controls. Patient age was dichotomized: ≤ 50 and > 50 years.

Results

9 (12%) BRCA carriers had occult carcinoma: 8 STIC and 1 stage IC tubal carcinoma with STIC. No occult carcinomas or STIC was seen in controls. STIC involved the distal tube in all cases and was multifocal in three cases. STIC was more common in women > 50 (p = 0.06). P53 overexpression was common in BRCA carriers (30%) and controls (43%) (p = 0.5) and did not correlate with age. Only 5/9 (55%) of STIC exhibited p53 overexpression. 2 patients had Ki67 overexpression: both BRCA1 carriers with STIC. No difference in the frequency of atypia/low grade dysplasia or hyperplasia was observed between BRCA carriers and controls.

Conclusions

STIC is the dominant precursor of serous fallopian tube carcinoma in BRCA carriers. There is insufficient evidence to support p53 overexpression alone as a putative precursor. Atypia/low grade dysplasia and epithelial hyperplasia are not pre-neoplastic lesions of serous fallopian tube carcinoma.     

Ovarian cancer and genetic susceptibility in relation to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Occurrence, clinical importance and intervention

The Nordic countries have the highest incidences of ovarian cancer in the world (around 15 cases per 100,000 women). We have conducted a review of the recent literature with focus on the Nordic countries, on genetic susceptibility to ovarian cancer, and the clinical implications in relation to the BRCAI and BRCA2 genes. One of the strongest risk factors for ovarian cancer is a family history of ovarian and/or early-onset breast cancer. It is thought that germline mutations in BRCA1/2 might be responsible for as much as 10% of all ovarian cancer cases and all families containing either multiple case, site-specific ovarian cancer cases or breast and ovarian cancers together. Data from several international studies suggest that the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in a BRCA 1 mutation carrier can vary from 18 to 56% and from 14 to 27% in a BRCA2 carrier, depending on the presence/absence of a family history of the disease. Genetic evaluation and testing is used in many countries to identify families with BRCA1/2 mutations. Once a mutation has been identified, genetic counseling and testing can be offered to unaffected family members. Prophylactic oophorectomy in unaffected mutation carriers will eliminate the risk of ovarian cancer, although there is a slight residual risk of peritoneal cancer. During oophorectomy, the Fallopian tube should also be removed. If a woman does not want prophylactic oophorectomy, then tubal ligation or oral contraceptive use can be considered as these have been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk also in mutation carriers.     

Genetic susceptibility testing and prophylactic oophorectomy

About 10% of ovarian cancer cases are thought to have a hereditary basis and family history is the strongest risk factor for the development of this disease. In the past, prophylactic oophorectomy has been advocated for women with two or more affected first-degree relatives. More recently, with the identification of the genes responsible for most hereditary ovarian cancers (BRCA1, BRCA2), oophorectomy can now be offered specifically to women who are mutation carriers. Conversely, non-carriers in these families can be reassured that their risk of ovarian cancer is not increased. The value of oophorectomy in mutation carriers has not yet been proven, however, and there are concerns that the benefit may be less than intuitively expected. First, although the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer initially was reported to be as high as 60%, more recent studies have reported risks in the range of 15-30%. A better understanding of the genetic and/or environmental basis of variable penetrance is needed to augment our ability to counsel women regarding their risk. In addition, peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma indistinguishable from ovarian cancer occurs in some women following oophorectomy. Studies that better define how often this occurs also are needed to establish more firmly the value of prophylactic oophorectomy. In view of the uncertainty regarding the efficacy of prophylactic oophorectomy, chemopreventive and early detection approaches also deserve consideration as strategies for decreasing ovarian cancer mortality in women who carry mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.     

Current understanding of the epidemiology and clinical implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for ovarian cancer.

Genetic testing for susceptibility to ovarian cancer is rapidly becoming integrated into the clinical practice of oncology. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is now recommended to most women with invasive ovarian cancer. Approximately 10% of these women will have a positive test, including 4% of women without a family history of cancer. Currently, the treatment of hereditary ovarian cancer is the same as for non-hereditary ovarian cancer. It appears that women with ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation experience better survival than women without a mutation, possibly due to enhanced susceptibility to chemotherapy. Strategies for prevention of ovarian cancer among carriers include oral contraceptives, tubal ligation and prophylactic oophorectomy.     

Molecular evidence linking primary cancer of the fallopian tube to BRCA1 germline mutations

OBJECTIVES: BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations increase the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Fallopian tube cancer has occasionally been observed in breast-ovarian cancer families. At our family cancer clinic we recently encountered two cases of Fallopian tube cancer within two families harboring a BRCA1 germline mutation. To study the relationship between Fallopian tube cancer and BRCA1 mutations, a histopathological reevaluation and molecular analysis were performed. METHODS: Medical and histopathological reports of the Fallopian tube cancer cases as well as archival tissue blocks were retrieved. The histopathological diagnoses were reevaluated. We investigated whether patients with Fallopian tube cancer had been carriers of a BRCA germline mutation. In addition we investigated whether loss of the wild-type allele had occurred in the tumor. RESULTS: In 2 of 23 families with a known BRCA1 mutation from our family cancer clinic, a case of Fallopian tube cancer was reported. Histological reevaluation confirmed the diagnosis of Fallopian tube cancer in both cases. In one case Fallopian tube cancer may have been part of a multifocal primary malignancy. In both patients the presence of a BRCA1 mutation was confirmed in the germline. Furthermore, we showed loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in both tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide the first molecular evidence that Fallopian tube cancer may be due to germline mutations in BRCA1. This may have important consequences for the preferred method of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers.     

CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of screening is to identify cases of ovarian cancer in early stages. However, screening of women in the general population is ineffective due to a failure of detecting early-stage disease and high false positive rates of CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) monitoring. The purpose of this study is to evaluate ovarian cancer screening by means of pelvic examination, serum CA125 and TVU in a consecutive series of high-risk women. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 132 BRCA1, 20 BRCA2 germ line mutation carriers, 72 members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families and 88 breast cancer patients from a hereditary breast cancer (HBC) family, seen between January 1996 and December 2002. RESULTS: Among 10 women with an elevated CA125 level and a positive TVU, three screening carcinomas (one FIGO stage IC, one stage IIIB and one stage IV) and one interval carcinoma (stage IV) were detected. Five occult ovarian/fallopian tube carcinomas (two stage IA, one stage IC, one stage IIIB and one stage IV) after bilateral prophylactic (salpingo-) oophorectomy (BP(S)O) have been found in 152 women. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the combination of CA125 and TVU were the highest (40%, 99%, 40% and 99%) followed by CA125 alone (50%, 96%, 13% and 99%), pelvic exam (40%, 98%, 21% and 99%) and TVU, separately (40%, 90%, 6% and 99%). CONCLUSION: By combining CA125 with TVU results, a PPV of 40% was achieved. However, the diagnostic tools appear to be only sensitive in detecting ovarian cancer at an advanced stage, while three of four tumors with early-stage disease in this series had normal screening tests prior to the diagnosis.     

输卵管感染与癌变及预防性输卵管切除术的价值

临床病理资料提示,输卵管感染可能与输卵管癌、卵巢癌的发生有一定关系,但目前尚无定论。近年来“卵巢癌的输卵管起源学说”使人们日益关注输卵管预防性切除术的价值。目前研究显示,预防性附件切除能有效降低遗传性卵巢癌,尤其是BRCA1/2基因突变携带者的卵巢癌的发病风险,能否降低散发性卵巢癌的发生需进一步探讨。单纯预防性输卵管切除能否降低遗传性及散发性卵巢癌以及其他盆腹腔浆液性腺癌的发病风险也需进一步研究。临床应用预防性附件或输卵管切除时,应慎重评估患者综合情况,权衡手术获益和风险,为患者争取最大手术获益。