Historical perspective on the development and evolution of bioanalytical guidance and technology

Bioanalytical methods employed for the quantitative determination of drugs and their metabolites in biological fluids provide essential regulatory data for bioavailability, bioequivalence, pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies. The quality of these studies is directly related to the underlying bioanalytical data. Data generated by a typical bioanalytical laboratory is submitted to not only the local regulatory agency, but also to multiple regulatory agencies worldwide. Many pharmaceutical companies and CROs are now performing bioanalytical work for global submissions and the regulatory agencies are often reviewing the bioanalytical work performed in other countries. The bioanalytical workplace has become global and therefore needs universal rules for quality and compliance of bioanalysis. This paper provides a historical perspective and insight into the development and evolution of the regulatory guidance for bioanalytical method validation and analysis of samples.     

Recent development in software and automation tools for high-throughput discovery bioanalysis

Bioanalysis with LC-MS/MS has been established as the method of choice for quantitative determination of drug candidates in biological matrices in drug discovery and development. The LC-MS/MS bioanalytical support for drug discovery, especially for early discovery, often requires high-throughput (HT) analysis of large numbers of samples (hundreds to thousands per day) generated from many structurally diverse compounds (tens to hundreds per day) with a very quick turnaround time, in order to provide important activity and liability data to move discovery projects forward. Another important consideration for discovery bioanalysis is its fit-for-purpose quality requirement depending on the particular experiments being conducted at this stage, and it is usually not as stringent as those required in bioanalysis supporting drug development. These aforementioned attributes of HT discovery bioanalysis made it an ideal candidate for using software and automation tools to eliminate manual steps, remove bottlenecks, improve efficiency and reduce turnaround time while maintaining adequate quality. In this article we will review various recent developments that facilitate automation of individual bioanalytical procedures, such as sample preparation, MS/MS method development, sample analysis and data review, as well as fully integrated software tools that manage the entire bioanalytical workflow in HT discovery bioanalysis. In addition, software tools supporting the emerging high-resolution accurate MS bioanalytical approach are also discussed.     

Inductively coupled plasma-MS in drug development: bioanalytical aspects and applications

The vast majority of today's modern bioanalytical methods for pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity purposes are based on LC-MS/MS and immunoanalytical approaches. Indeed, these methodologies are suitable for a wide range of molecules from small to large. For a smaller but not insignificant group of compounds, LC-MS/MS is not suitable - or in some cases much less suitable - as a reliable bioanalytical methodology, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-MS is a more appropriate methodology. ICP-MS is one of these less widely used techniques in drug development. This methodology is predominantly used for elemental bioanalysis for pharmacokinetics, for imaging purposes, for mass-balance, food-effect and biomarker studies. In addition, in the last couple of years an increasing number of applications has been published, where ICP-MS and its various hyphenations (LC-ICP-MS, CE-ICP-MS) have been used for speciation/metabolism and proteomics studies. Here, the analytical potential, the quantitative bioanalytical aspects, the various modes of operation and the challenges of the application of ICP-MS in life sciences applications are given. This includes an overview of recent applications in this area in scientific literature, the various hyphenation possibilities and their application areas and the analysis of the various sample matrices applicable to these fields. It also provides a brief outlook of where the potential of this technique lies in the future of regulated bioanalysis and drug development.     

Reliable procedures to evaluate and repair crosstalk for bioanalytical MS/MS assays

Louis-Philippe Morin is a senior instrument application specialist at Algorithme Pharma, a CRO located in Laval, Canada. He has been working in the bioanalysis industry for the past 10 years where he became a subject matter expert in analytical instrumentation, especially in the MS field. His responsibilities in his current position are to optimize the workflow of the laboratory and to find new procedures, or approaches, to fix complex analytical problems. Louis-Philippe's expertise acquired over the years has led him to multiple publications regarding instrumentation. LC-MS/MS is the analytical technique of choice for the quantification of drugs in biological fluids. In recent years, MS/MS detection has been impacted by the rapid evolution of bioanalysis industry requirements. The availability of fast chromatographic systems, the demand for wider dynamic ranges and the extensive use of stable isotope-labeled internal standards in bioanalysis has pushed some triple quadrupole detectors to their limits of operation. Consequently, this situation has led to a re-evaluation of the problem of crosstalk as a potential cause of issues in bioanalysis. In this article, the importance of crosstalk verification on the MS/MS instrument will be demonstrated. Additionally, procedures to identify, evaluate and fix possible crosstalk issues during bioanalytical assays on MS/MS instruments are proposed.     

Torcetrapib for animal and human pharmacokinetic studies: applicability of chiral and achiral methodologies

The emergence of bioanalysis as a key tool in the drug-discovery and -development process has enabled the development of sensitive, precise and specific bioanalytical methods in recent years. These methods have enabled the progress of novel chemical entities through the life cycle of drug discovery and development. The focus of this review article is on a well-known cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor known as torcetrapib. Although torcetrapib was withdrawn from clinical development, it is important to understand the various bioanalytical methodologies (chiral and achiral) that are readily available for the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characterization of the drug. Additionally, these methodologies may be applicable to the bioanalysis of the next-generation CETP inhibitors. This review covers the development and validation of assay methods that were used to obtain preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic parameters of torcetrapib. Accordingly, methods are available for the determination of torcetrapib in various species, namely dogs, hamsters, rats, mice, monkeys and humans. Since torcetrapib is a chiral compound, methods have been developed for stereoselective bioanalysis to evaluate in vivo chiral inversion phenomena. Interestingly, torcetrapib can be analyzed by various bioanalytical options (e.g., HPLC-UV, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS and GC-MS assays) depending on the type of species under consideration with the associated sensitivity requirements. This review covers all the available methodologies for torcetrapib, providing both assay-development and -optimization strategies. It also tabulates validation parameters and enumerates the difficulties, challenges and nuances of the various published assays for torcetrapib.     

Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC-MS/MS

Liquid chromatography linked to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has played an important role in pharmacokinetics and metabolism studies at various drug development stages since its introduction to the pharmaceutical industry. This article reviews the most recent advances in sample preparation, separation, and the mass spectrometric aspects of high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis of drug and metabolites in biological matrices. Newly introduced techniques such as ultra-performance liquid chromatography with small particles (sub-2 microm) and monolithic chromatography offer improvements in speed, resolution and sensitivity compared to conventional chromatographic techniques. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) on silica columns with low aqueous/high organic mobile phase is emerging as a valuable supplement to the reversed-phase LC-MS/MS. Sample preparation formatted to 96-well plates has allowed for semi-automation of off-line sample preparation techniques, significantly impacting throughput. On-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) utilizing column-switching techniques is rapidly gaining acceptance in bioanalytical applications to reduce both time and labor required to produce bioanalytical results. Extraction sorbents for on-line SPE extend to an array of media including large particles for turbulent flow chromatography, restricted access materials (RAM), monolithic materials, and disposable cartridges utilizing traditional packings such as those used in Spark Holland systems. In the end, this paper also discusses recent studies of matrix effect in LC-MS/MS analysis and how to reduce/eliminate matrix effect in method development and validation.     

Recommendations for Validation of LC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Methods for Protein Biotherapeutics

This paper represents the consensus views of a cross-section of companies and organizations from the USA and Canada regarding the validation and application of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for bioanalysis of protein biotherapeutics in regulated studies. It was prepared under the auspices of the AAPS Bioanalytical Focus Group’s Protein LC-MS Bioanalysis Subteam and is intended to serve as a guide to drive harmonization of best practices within the bioanalytical community and provide regulators with an overview of current industry thinking on applying LC-MS/MS technology for protein bioanalysis. For simplicity, the scope was limited to the most common current approach in which the protein is indirectly quantified using LC-MS/MS measurement of one or more of its surrogate peptide(s) produced by proteolytic digestion. Within this context, we considered a range of sample preparation approaches from simple in-matrix protein denaturation and digestion to complex procedures involving affinity capture enrichment. Consideration was given to the method validation experiments normally associated with traditional LC-MS/MS and ligand-binding assays. Our collective experience, thus far, is that LC-MS/MS methods for protein bioanalysis require different development and validation considerations than those used for small molecules. The method development and validation plans need to be tailored to the particular assay format being established, taking into account a number of important factors: the intended use of the assay, the test species or study population, the characteristics of the protein biotherapeutic and its similarity to endogenous proteins, potential interferences, as well as the nature, quality, and availability of reference and internal standard materials.KEY WORDS: affinity capture mass spectrometry, industry white paper, method validation, protein LC-MS/MS quantification, regulated bioanalysis     

LC-MS/MS bioanalytical challenge: ultra-high sensitivity assays

Anne-Fran?oise Aubry is Director of Bioanalytical Sciences at Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., leading a team in developing bioanalytical methods for early development drug candidates in support of toxicology and clinical studies. Her main research interests are high-speed, high-resolution LC and new approaches for LC-MS/MS drug bioanalysis in regulated laboratories. Anne Aubry is on the executive board of the Eastern Analytical Symposium and on the organizing committee of the Applied Pharmaceutical Analysis and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Structure Analysis (Shanghai 2011) conferences. The challenges of developing and running low pg/ml LC-MS/MS bioanalytical assays in a regulated laboratory are reviewed. The practical problems encountered in implementing ultrasensitive assays are less in reaching a suitable sensitivity on the instrument than in implementing procedures to control losses and contamination, eliminate matrix interferences and ensure assay robustness so that the assay can be validated to industry standards. Solutions to these problems can be found in each of the three facets of the bioanalytical assay: the sample preparation, the chromatographic separation and the mass spectrometric detection. The key to developing an ultrasensitive assay is to optimize each of these elements. Progress in MS instrumentation has been essential in our ability to reach the low pg/ml limits.     

Matrix effect elimination during LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method development

Due to the presence of endogenous components in biofluids, ionization suppression or enhancement may occur for bioanalytical assays using LC-MS or LC-MS/MS technologies. The matrix effect may affect the precision and accuracy of a bioanalytical method and, therefore, compromise the quality of the results. Protein precipitation sample preparation along with LC-MS/MS is a high-throughput method most commonly used in bioanalysis and is largely affected by the matrix effect. In order to eliminate the matrix effect during the method development, some considerations may be used: cleaner sample preparations, more sensitive instruments, which allow less material to be injected, different chromatographic separations and much more must be investigated. More than giving tools to adequately assess the matrix effect during the method development, this review gives scientists numerous ways to eliminate or reduce the matrix effect based on novel sample-preparation techniques, new chromatographic optimization methods and new technologies.     

Recent applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in natural products bioanalysis

Natural flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins and sesquiterpenoids have been extensively investigated because of their biological and physiological significances, as well as their promising clinical uses. It is necessary to monitor them or their metabolites in biological fluids for both pre-clinical studies and routine clinical uses. The successful hyphenation of LC and MS, which was thought as "the bird wants to marry with fish", has been conducted widely in biological samples analysis. This present paper reviewed the feasibility of LC-MS techniques in the identification and quantification of natural products (flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins and sesquiterpenoids) in biological fluids, dealing with sample preparation, LC techniques, suitability of different MS techniques. Perspective of LC-MS was also discussed to show the potential of this technology. The citations cover the period 2002-2006. We conclude that LC-MS is an extremely powerful tool for the analysis of natural products in biological samples.     

Small Molecule Specific Run Acceptance,Specific Assay Operation,and Chromatographic Run Quality Assessment: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Teams

Consensus practices and regulatory guidance for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays of small molecules are more aligned globally than for any of the other bioanalytical techniques addressed by the Global Bioanalysis Consortium. The three Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Teams provide recommendations and best practices for areas not yet addressed fully by guidances and consensus for small molecule bioanalysis. Recommendations from all three teams are combined in this report for chromatographic run quality, validation, and sample analysis run acceptance.KEY WORDS: bioanalytical assay validation, LC-MS/MS, sample analysis, small molecule     

LC-MS Development strategies for quantitative bioanalysis

Although quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography in conjunction with atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been in use for approximately fifteen years, new concepts and technologies are continuously being introduced to enhance the multiple steps of quantitative LC-MS/MS bioanalysis. In this review article, we have focused on concepts and technologies that have recently been introduced to achieve further improvements in biological sample collection/storage and extraction, chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. Under these major headings, a number of specific topics are presented, summarizing the most recent findings in these areas. Included among the topics discussed are: off-line plasma extraction, on-line plasma extraction, enhanced mass resolution, atmospheric pressure photoionization, high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry, electron capture atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, enhancing MS detection via formation of anionic and cationic adducts, chemical derivatization, ultra-performance chromatography, hydrophilic interaction chromatography, and MS-friendly ion-pair reversed-phase chromatography. In the end, we discuss potential pitfalls in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis and the means to avoid them. Such pitfalls may occur due to mass spectral interference from metabolites or prodrugs, due to the use of inappropriate calibration standard and quality control samples for analysis involving unstable drugs or metabolites, and due to the wild card phenomenon commonly known as the matrix effect.     

Insights in regulated bioanalysis of human insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods

Despite the long and illustrious history of insulin and insulin analogs as important biotherapeutics, the regulated bioanalysis (in this article, regulated bioanalysis refers to the formalized process for generating bioanalytical data to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments intended for development of insulin and insulin analogs as biotherapeutics, as opposed to the analytical process used for measuring insulin as a biomarker) of these peptides remains a challenging endeavor for a number of reasons. Paramount is the fact that the therapeutic concentrations are often low in serum/plasma and not too dissimilar from the endogenous level, particularly in patients with insulin resistance, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Accordingly, this perspective was written to provide helpful background information for the design and conduct of immunoassays to support regulated bioanalysis of insulin and insulin analogs. Specifically, it highlights the technical challenges for determination of insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods that are intended to support evaluations of pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. In a broader sense, this perspective describes the general bioanalytical issues that are common to regulated bioanalysis of peptides and articulates some of the bioanalytical differences between conventional monoclonal antibodies and peptide therapeutics.     

Bioanalysis young investigator: Dajana Vuckovic

Dajana currently has 21 peer-reviewed articles published or accepted for publication in top analytical chemistry journals including Analytical Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition. She has co-authored eight book chapters, and made 22 presentations at international conferences such as Pittcon and ASMS conferences. Dajana's commitment to excellence is also illustrated by the awards she has won to date, including a Postdoctoral Fellow Award offered by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2010-2012) and the Douglas E Ryan Analytical Chemistry Student Award of the Canadian Society for Chemistry (2010). During her PhD in my group, Dajana excelled in very diverse areas of interest including the development of targeted LC-MS assays for drugs and metabolites, application of in vivo solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in mice and LC-MS metabolomics for the first time, and evaluation of a high-throughput 96-well plate automated SPME system. Since her graduation from my group she has further extended her bioanalytical expertise to proteomics. I think Dajana's excellent research productivity, accomplishments to date, willingness to address complex bioanalytical challenges and extensive expertise in both small molecule and protein bioanalysis make her an excellent candidate for the Bioanalysis Young Investigator Award.     

'Large Meets Small': connecting the bioanalytical community around peptide and protein bioanalysis with LC-MS(/MS)

This conference report provides an overview of the discussions at the 2nd European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) Focus Meeting 'Large Meets Small' held on 20 and 21 June 2011 in Brussels. The meeting discussed scientific progress in the bioanalysis of peptides and proteins with MS-based techniques. Bioanalytical experts in ligand-binding assays (LBAs) and MS from industry and academia presented at the meeting or joined the discussion. The conference hosted sessions on technology developments, validation requirements, cutting edge (bio)analytical approaches for both proteins and peptides and discussions on the analytical challenge presented by the metabolism of peptides or proteins. The engagement of the scientists as well as the bioanalytical challenges identified were real: by shifting peptide or protein analysis from the LBAs laboratory into the LC-MS laboratory, the bioanalytical scientist is moving into partially uncharted territory. The conference delegates strongly shared the feeling that success in overcoming the challenges of peptide and protein bioanalysis will require further integration of the expertise of LBAs and LC-MS/MS experts.     

Conducting remote bioanalytical data monitoring and review based on scientific quality objectives

For bioanalytical laboratories that follow GLP regulations and generate data for new drug filing, ensuring quality standards set by regulatory guidance is a fundamental expectation. Numerous guidelines and White Papers have been published by regulatory agencies, professional working groups and field experts in the past two decades, and have significantly improved the standards of good practices for bioanalysis. From a sponsor's perspective, continuous quality monitoring of the data generated by CRO laboratories, identifying adverse trends and taking corrective and preventative actions against issues encountered, are critical aspects of effective bioanalytical outsourcing management. This is especially important for clinical bioanalysis, where one validated assay is applied for analyzing a large number of samples of diverse demographics and disease states. This perspective article presents thoughts toward remote data monitoring and its merits for scientific quality oversight, and introduces a novel Bioanalytical Data Review software that was custom-developed and platform-neural, to conduct remote data monitoring on raw or processed LC-MS/MS data from CROs. Flexible, adaptive and user-customizable queries are applied for conducting project-, batch- and sample-level data review based on scientific quality performance factors commonly assessed for good bioanalytical practice.     

Bioanalytical applications using supercritical fluid techniques

The bioanalytical applications of supercritical fluid techniques, such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), are of increasing interest. The main role of these techniques is in the sample preparation and separation of biologically active compounds, particularly drugs and their metabolites, as well as endogenous compounds. An insight is given into the different types of extracting fluids and modifiers, detectors, stationary phases, mobile phases and collection strategies. A critical discussion is presented on the existing state of the art concerning the applications of SFC and SFE with a specific focus on its advantages and limitations in the bioanalytical field. New developments and the possibilities for routine work in the near future are also covered.     

Unique challenges of providing bioanalytical support for biological therapeutic pharmacokinetic programs

Regulatory recommendations for providing bioanalytical support for biological therapeutics have co-evolved with the increasing success of these unique pharmaceuticals. Immunoassays have been used to quantify biological macromolecules for more than 50 years. These assays rely on the use of antigen-specific antibodies. More recently, LC-MS methods have being adapted to quantitate biologics. LC-MS has attributes that complement the limitations encountered by immunoassays. Whether employing immunoassay or LC-MS methods, compared with traditional chemical-based therapeutics, biological therapeutics present unique analytical challenges to analysts. In this article, we review bioanalytical strategies for supporting biologics and discuss the regulatory and analytical challenges that must be met.     

Recent advances in use of LC/MS/MS for quantitative high-throughput bioanalytical support of drug discovery

LC/MS/MS based bioanalysis using atmospheric pressure ionization (API)-style interfaces has now been applied for over a decade. This technology, which initially found application for clinical bioanalysis, is now firmly established as the primary bioanalytical tool for ADME studies related to drug discovery and lead optimization (LO). This review focuses on recent advances in LC/MS/MS based bioanalysis in support of drug discovery and LO. The initial part of the article reviews the principal components of LC/MS/MS bioanalysis: sample preparation, chromatography, ionization and mass analysis. In each section, factors affecting high throughput bioanalysis are addressed. Because of the importance of on-line column switching methods to discovery bioanalysis, the section on sample preparation is divided into off-line and on-line approaches. In addition, the discussion of chromatography is limited to reversed phase liquid chromatography with emphasis given to the trend towards high-flow gradient elution techniques. The latter part of the review focuses on considerations for experimental design. In this section, pooling methods such as cassette dosing are discussed along with more highly integrated strategies linking bioanalysis with protocol generation and sample collection. The article concludes by briefly reviewing factors, which affect bioanalytical precision and accuracy, such as ion suppression, analyte stability and metabolite interference.