Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical significance of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope.

BACKGROUND

Induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope and structural heart disease is usually assigned diagnostic significance. However, the true frequency of subsequent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic medications is unknown.

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, the incidence of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies for sustained ventricular arrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope (syncope group, n = 22) was compared with that of a control group of patients (n = 32) with clinically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were inducible in both groups and neither group received antiarrhythmic medications. All ICDs had stored electrograms or RR intervals. Clinical variables were similar between groups except that congestive cardiac failure was more common in the syncope group.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to first appropriate ICD therapy for syncope and control groups produced overlapping curves (p = 0.9), with 57 ± 11% and 50 ± 9%, respectively, receiving ICD therapy by one year. In both groups, the induced arrhythmia was significantly faster than spontaneous arrhythmias, but the cycle lengths of induced and spontaneous arrhythmias were positively correlated (R = 0.6, p < 0.0001). During follow-up, three cardiac transplantations and seven deaths occurred in the syncope group, and two transplantations and five deaths occurred in the control group (36-month survival without transplant 52 ± 11% and 83 ± 7%, respectively, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias occur commonly and at a similar rate to patients with documented sustained VT. Thus, electrophysiologic testing in unexplained syncope can identify those at risk of potentially life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, and aggressive treatment of these patients is warranted.     

Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing recurrence of syncope in patients with structural heart disease, previously unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias had an ICD implanted. All ICDs delivered antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy. Detection and therapy were programmed according to uniform criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63+/-11 years and most of them were male (36/38). After a mean follow-up of 28+/-15 (4-61) months, six patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Syncope recurred in three patients, but in none of them was it caused by an arrhythmic event. In 18 patients, 113 episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were detected and appropriately treated by the ICD. The mean time from implant until first appropriate therapy was 18+/-14 months. The actuarial probability of receiving appropriate therapy was 20% and 42% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias, ICD prevents syncope associated with arrhythmic events. Frequent effective use of antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy seem essential to this aim.     

The effect of spironolactone on ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Background- Previous studies have suggested that aldosterone blockade can reduce the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with heart failure. The SPIronolactone to Reduce ICD Therapy (SPIRIT) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that spironolactone reduces the incidence of VT/VF in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) who are at moderately high risk for recurrent VT/VF. Methods and Results- Ninety patients who had ICDs who were at moderately high risk for recurrent VT/VF and who were not candidates for spironolactone by current heart failure guidelines were randomized to receive spironolactone 25 mg daily or placebo in a double-blind fashion. All patients had previously received ICD therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing) for VT/VF within 2 years of randomization or an ICD for secondary prevention of VT/VF within 6 months of randomization. The primary end point was time to first recurrence of VT/VF requiring ICD therapy. After a median follow-up of 35 months, the Kaplan-Meier probability estimates for VT/VF requiring ICD therapy were 68.7% in the placebo group and 84.7% in the spironolactone group. Compared with placebo, spironolactone was associated with a similar risk of VT/VF (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64-1.83; P=0.71). There was no significant difference between the median times to first VT/VF recurrence requiring ICD therapy in the 2 groups. Conclusions- In patients with ICDs who were at moderately high risk for recurrent VT/VF on account of a recent VT/VF event that was either sustained or treated by the ICD and who were not candidates for spironolactone by current heart failure guidelines, spironolactone did not delay the first recurrence of VT/VF or reduce the risk of recurrent VT/VF.     

High incidence of tachyarrhythmias detected by an implantable loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a complex clinical syndrome that may be challenging with respect to a definite diagnosis. The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a useful tool to define but also to exclude an arrhythmic aetiology. AIM: To investigate the causes of recurrent syncope or near-syncope with respect to underlying arrhythmias in non-selected consecutive patients monitored with an ILR. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 55 patients (34 men, 21 women; age 60+/-19 years) with unexplained syncope who received an ILR for prolonged monitoring at our institution between April 1998 and October 2006. RESULTS: Forty (73%) patients had a recurrence of syncope or near-syncope. Structural heart disease was present in 18 (33%) patients, 4 of them having an ejection fraction <35%. An arrhythmia was detected as the cause of syncope in 25 (46%) patients. The ILR was successful in establishing a symptom-rhythm correlation in 63%. The mean follow-up period from implantation to occurrence of the detected arrhythmias was 9+/-8 months. Bradyarrhythmias were recorded in 12 (22%) patients, whereas tachyarrhythmias were found in 13 (24%) patients. Narrow QRS tachycardia was the underlying arrhythmia in 6 patients and wide QRS tachycardia in 7 patients. A pacemaker was implanted in all 12 patients with bradyarrhythmias. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy was indicated in 6 patients with adjunctive catheter ablation in 3 of them. Four patients presenting with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia were treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation. CONCLUSION: The ILR helped efficaciously to determine the correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment of recurrent syncope. A considerably high proportion of tachyarrhythmias was detected in this non-selected consecutive population. The majority of patients with tachyarrhythmic syncope required defibrillator implantation and/or radiofrequency ablation.     

Circadian, daily, and seasonal distributions of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

This study investigated the circadian, daily, and seasonal distributions of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with new implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement at Creighton University Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2004. The incidence and distribution of ventricular tachyarrhythmias as recorded by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were analyzed with respect to season, month, day of the week, and average daily temperature. Data from 154 consecutive patients (mean age 67 +/- 14 years; 78% men, 71% with ischemic heart disease [IHD], mean left ventricular ejection fraction 34 +/- 15%) were analyzed. During a mean follow-up of 35 +/- 19 months, a total of 1,055 episodes of spontaneously terminated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 612 episodes of VT or ventricular fibrillation with appropriate device therapy occurred. Distributions in the incidence of VT and VT or ventricular fibrillation receiving appropriate therapy were similar in patients with IHD and non-IHD. Spontaneously terminated VT and appropriately treated VT or ventricular fibrillation episodes occurred with the greatest incidence in the winter months and the lowest incidence in summer, spring, and fall. A linear regression between the number of episodes and the average daily temperature showed a greater likelihood of the 2 events occurring on cooler days, irrespective of the cause of cardiac disease. A weekly distribution was also observed, with the greatest proportion of episodes occurring on Fridays and the lowest on Saturdays and Sundays. A bimodal circadian distribution was present, with the greatest peak occurring from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. and a smaller peak occurring from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. In conclusion, the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias appears to follow circadian, daily, and seasonal distributions that are similar in patients with IHD and non-IHD. The incidence inversely correlates with average daily temperatures.     

Triggering effect of physical and mental stress on spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND: Physical and mental stress as well as sexual activity are potential triggering factors of acute coronary events and sudden cardiac death. HYPOTHESIS: These factors may also trigger recurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: We performed a case-crossover study in 43 consecutive patients with 95 symptomatic, ICD-documented tachyarrhythmic events and calculated the relative risk of tachyarrhythmia recurrence during physical and mental stress. Physical and mental activity was graded on a 4-step intensity scale, and stress was defined as physical exertion or mental stress with an intensity grade > or = II during or up to 1 h before arrhythmia recurrence. Relative risk was determined taking into account the habitual weekly stress frequency of each patient. RESULTS: Physical stress was present in 26% (n = 25), mental stress in 24% (n = 23), and sexual activity in 2% (n = 2) of analyzed events. The weekly habitual stress frequency was 8 +/- 8 (median 7) for physical stress, 6 +/- 6 (median 4) for mental stress, and 0.5 +/- 0.5 (median 0.25) for sexual activity. Thus, relative risk of arrhythmia recurrence during the presence of stress was 7.5 for physical activity (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-11.1), 9.5 (CI 6.3-14.5) for mental activity, and 7.5 (CI 2.3-24.8) for sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Physical and mental stress as well as sexual activity are factors that significantly increase relative risk of spontaneous recurrence of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Consideration of this stress-related relative risk increase may contribute to avoidance of harmful shock delivery in ICD recipients.     

Incidence of nonsustained and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

INTRODUCTION: Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is a frequent phenomenon in some patients with heart disease, but its association with sustained ventricular tachycardias (ventricular tachycardia [VT]/ventricular fibrillation [VF]) is still not clear. The aim of this study was to determine whether NSVT incidence was associated with sustained VT/VF in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective data analysis was conducted in 923 ICD patients with a mean follow-up of 4 months. NSVT and sustained VT/VF were defined as device-detected tachycardias. The incidence rates of NSVT and sustained VT/VF as well as ICD therapies were determined as episodes per patient. The NSVT index was defined as the product of NSVT episodes/day times the mean number of beats per episode, i.e., total beats/day. The NSVT index peak was defined as the highest value on or prior to the day with sustained VT/VF episodes. Patients (n = 393) with NSVT experienced a higher incidence of sustained VT/VF (17.2 +/- 63.0 episodes/patient) and ICD therapies (15.2 +/- 61.4 episodes/patient) than patients (n = 530) without NSVT (sustained VT/VF: 0.5 +/- 6.6 and therapies: 0.5 +/- 5.6; P < 0.0001). Approximately 74% of NSVT index peaks occurred on the same day or <3 days prior to sustained VT/VF episodes. The index was higher for peaks < or =3 days prior to the day with sustained VT/VF (94.3 +/- 140.1 total beats/day) than for peaks >3 days prior to the day with sustained VT/VF (32.7 +/- 55.9 total beats/day; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ICD patients with NSVT represent a population more likely to experience sustained VT/VF episodes with a temporal association between an NSVT surge and sustained VT/VF occurrence.     

Role of triple extrastimuli during electrophysiologic study of patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 172 consecutive patients for evaluation of documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. One hundred thirteen patients presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia that was hemodynamically stable, and 59 patients presented with cardiac arrest. Seventy-one patients without previously documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias were also studied to determine the specificity of our electrophysiologic study protocol. The stimulation protocol included single, double, and triple right ventricular extrastimuli and rapid ventricular pacing at multiple cycle lengths performed at one or more right ventricular sites. Stimulation was performed at one or more left ventricular sites in patients with documented spontaneous arrhythmias when right ventricular programmed stimulation failed to induce sustained ventricular tachycardia. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced in 110 (97%) of the patients who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia, in 48 (81%) of the patients who presented with cardiac arrest, and in 28 (40%) of the patients without documented spontaneous arrhythmias. Right ventricular triple extrastimuli induced tachycardia in 22% of patients who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia vs 46% of those who presented with cardiac arrest (p less than .001). Left ventricular stimulation was required for tachycardia induction in 3% of patients with stable tachycardia vs 19% of those with cardiac arrest (p less than .01). Triple extrastimuli induced 57% of tachycardias in the 28 patients without spontaneous arrhythmias, and virtually all of these tachycardias were polymorphic and nonsustained. The cycle lengths of tachycardias induced in each group by double and triple extrastimuli were similar, but the tachycardias induced in patients with cardiac arrest were significantly faster than those induced in the ventricular tachycardia group (mean cycle length 218 vs 291 msec, p less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the long-term efficacy of implantable defibrillators and sotalol for documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease

Background: The relative efficacy of antitachycardia pacing implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ATPICD) and sotalol in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is controversial. Aim: To compare the mortality in patients treated with ATPICD and sotalol for documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring late after previous myocardial infarction. Methods: In this non-randomised retrospective study of 139 consecutive patients all patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia at baseline electrophysiological studies. Before the availability of ATPICD, 22 patients were treated with sotalol as part of a randomised study comparing the efficacy of sotalol to amiodarone. After ATPICD became available sotalol was used in 49 patients in whom intravenous testing predicted sotalol to be effective and ATPICD were implanted in 68 patients in whom sotalol was predicted to be ineffective at electrophysiological testing. Thus, 68 patients were treated with an ATPICD and 71 with sotalol. Results: The two groups were well-matched for age, type of presenting arrhythmia, severity of coronary artery disease and ventricular function. At 36 months Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality from ventricular tachyarrhythmia were 0% with ATPICD and 15% with sotalol (p=0.03). Kaplan-Meier estimates of total mortality at 36 months were 12% with ATPICD and 25% with sotalol (p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed hazard ratio of 7.9 (p=0.06) for death from ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with sotalol compared to ATPICD. Conclusions: While no difference in total mortality was demonstrated, treatment with ATPICD is probably superior to sotalol for preventing deaths due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. (Aust NZ J Med 1999; 29: 331–341.)     

Current application of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the management of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Several studies have uniformly demonstrated a marked reduction in expected arrhythmic/sudden death rates in patients with either drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or survivors of cardiac arrest following the implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Significant advances in these devices over the past 10 years have permitted programmability and demand pacing. There has been sophistication in tachycardia detection and the characteristics of the delivered electrical therapy. Programs to reconfirm the arrhythmic event, sensing parameters for rate, electrogram amplitude, data storage, interrogation and morphology are available in some devices. Some models will permit both antitachycardia pacing as well as defibrillation functions and choice of shock waveforms as bidirectional and biphasic shocks. Endocardial lead systems using smaller and more flexible electrodes may obliterate the need for thoracotomy. It appears that ICD therapy will form a significant component in antiarrhythmic therapy in the future.     

Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test who are treated with an implantable defibrillator.

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope may be at high risk for sudden cardiac death, and they are sometimes treated with an implantable defibrillator.

METHODS

This study prospectively determined the outcome of 14 consecutive patients who had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test and who underwent defibrillator implantation (Syncope Group). Nineteen consecutive patients with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy and a cardiac arrest who were treated with a defibrillator (Arrest Group) served as a control group.

RESULTS

Seven of 14 patients (50%) in the Syncope Group received appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias during a mean follow-up of 24 ± 13 months, compared with 8 of 19 patients (42%) in the Arrest Group during a mean follow-up of 45 ± 40 months (p = 0.1). The mean duration from device implantation until the first appropriate shock was 32 ± 7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 45 months) in the Syncope Group compared to 72 ± 12 months (95% CI, 48 to 96 months) in the Arrest Group (p = 0.1). Among patients who received appropriate shocks, the mean time from defibrillator implantation to the first appropriate shock was 10 ± 14 months in the Syncope Group, compared with 48 ± 47 months in the Arrest Group (p = 0.06). Recurrent syncope was always associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of appropriate defibrillator shocks and the association of recurrent syncope with ventricular arrhythmias support the treatment of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test with an implantable defibrillator.     

Determinants of outcome in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) study registry

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias varies according to clinical characteristics. We sought to identify predictors of survival in a large population of patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias not related to reversible or correctable causes included in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the impact of 36 demographic, clinical, and discharge treatment variables on the outcome for 3559 patients. Survival status was assessed with the use of the National Death Index. Multivariate analyses were performed with the use of the Cox proportional hazards model. After a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 12 months, 631 patients died. Actuarial survival was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 0.88), 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81), and 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74) at 1, 2, and 3 years. Multivariate predictors of worse survival included older age, severe left ventricular dysfunction, lower systolic blood pressure, history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, smoking or atrial fibrillation, and preexistent pacemaker. The hemodynamic impact of the qualifying arrhythmia was not a predictor of outcome. Defibrillator implantation and hospital discharge while the patient was taking a beta-blocker or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite therapeutic advances, the mortality rates of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias remain high. Prognosis depends on the severity of underlying heart disease, as reflected by the extent of left ventricular dysfunction and the presence of heart failure. Well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease does not carry a significantly better prognosis than ventricular tachyarrhythmia with more severe hemodynamic consequences.     

Use of the implantable loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope

Syncope is a complex clinical syndrome with multiple etiologies that can be very difficult to diagnose. The major obstacles to diagnosis are the periodic and unpredictable nature of events and the high spontaneous remission rate. Conventional testing is often unproductive in patients when initial non-invasive testing is negative, particularly when a paroxysmal ar-rhythmia is suspected. Holter monitoring is often employed initially, with limited utility. Holter monitoring provides a rhythm profile, but rarely achieves the gold standard of a symptom rhythm correlation. The external loop re-corder extends the period of monitoring, enhancing the diagnostic yield to as high as 60% in patients with symptoms likely to recur during a month of device use. Finally, implantable loop recorders further extend the ability to monitor cardiac patients, enhancing the diagnostic yield to as high as 85% in difficult to diagnose syncope. Several recent studies suggest that prolonged monitoring with an implantable loop recorder has a role in patients with syncope and conduction disturbances, negative tilt testing, unexplained seizures and may be superior to conventional testing with tilt and electrophysiologic studies in select patients.     

Benefits of treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with stable ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND--The availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) that are capable of antitachycardia pacing may lead to an increased use of ICDs in patients with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest. The frequency of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardias (cycle length < 250 ms) was investigated in patients who had a third generation ICD with endocardial leads implanted because they had haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest. METHODS--Between January 1990 and October 1993, 50 patients (age (mean (SD)) 60 (11); ejection fraction 39 (16)%; 82% with coronary artery disease and 8% with dilated cardiomyopathy) with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (cycle length (mean (SD)) 348 (60) ms; range 250-500 ms) and without a history of cardiac arrest were treated with third generation ICDs that were capable of antitachycardia pacing. Fast ventricular tachycardia had been induced in 14 (28%) during baseline electrophysiological study. The benefit of ICD treatment was estimated as the difference between total mortality and the occurrence of fast ventricular tachycardia that would have been fatal if it had not been terminated. RESULTS--During follow up of 17 (12) months, 33 patients (66%) had a total of 3861 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. 91% of these episodes were terminated by antitachycardia pacing. 11 patients (22%) had episodes of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardia and 3 of these also had inducible fast ventricular tachycardia. One patient died suddenly 27 months after implantation. The difference between survival without fast ventricular tachycardia and total mortality was 9%, 12%, 27%, and 27% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS--About a fifth of patients who had been given an ICD to treat haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and who had no history of cardiac arrest experienced fast ventricular tachycardia during follow up requiring immediate cardioversion. Prospective studies are needed to investigate whether the prognosis of patients with a history of haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest is improved by ICD therapy.     

Indications for and long-term survival in patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AICDs) were implanted in 378 men and 95 women, mean age 69 +/- 12 years. At 3.6-year follow up, survival was 76% in patients who had an AICD because of cardiac arrest as a result of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia not resulting from a transient or reversible cause; 85% in patients who had an AICD because of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in association with structural heart disease; 92% in patients who had an AICD because of syncope of undetermined origin with clinically relevant, hemodynamically sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation induced at electrophysiological study when drug therapy is ineffective, not tolerated, or not preferred; 84% in patients who had an AICD because of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia with coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, and inducible ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia at electrophysiological study that is not suppressible by a class I antiarrhythmic drug; and 85% in all 473 patients who had an AICD.     

Initial experience with an implantable loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope

Patients with recurrent syncope undiagnosed after extensive noninvasive and invasive testing pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Holter monitoring is non-diagnostic in 90% of cases. Recent developments in loop recorder technology permit longterm ECG monitoring in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope. The implantable loop recorder monitors a single lead electrogram continuously using 2 sensing electrodes on the device shell. The device was implanted in 20 patients (11 male, 9 female) with the history of recurrent syncope. During a mean follow-up of 12+/-6 months after device implantation, 11 patients (55%) experienced syncope (8 pts) or presyncope (3 pts). In the remaining 9 patients, no syncope occurred. In all 11 patients with syncope or presyncope during follow-up, loop recording definitively determined whether an arrhythmia was the cause of symptoms or not. Diagnosis included bradycardia in one patient, tachycardia in two patients, in one patient two rhythm disturbances were revealed: frequent ventricular premature beats with bigemini and atrial flutter. Two patients had a neurocardiogenic syncope. Syncope was nonarrhythmic in 5 patients. An implantable loop recorder is useful for establishing the diagnosis if symptoms are recurrent but too infrequent for conventional monitoring techniques.     

Role of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: inducibility and prognostic value in 102 patients

The role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in patientsat high risk of sudden death related to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy(DCM) is still controversial The possible reason is that moststudy series have been too small or that only a few patientshad documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This study therefore, looked at PVS performed in 102 patientswith DCM and documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT;n=63) or ventricular fibrillation (VF; n=39). Sustained VT wasinduced in 27 of 63 patients (43%) with documented sustainedVT and in 14 of 39 patients (36%) with documented VF (ns). VFwas induced in nine patients (14%) with a history of sustainedVT and in seven (18%) with a history of VF (ns). At a mean follow-upof 32±15 months, sudden death occurred in 14 (14%) patients,a rate similar in both patients with documented VT and VF (ns).Incidence of sudden death at 36 months was 6% in patients withinducible sustained VT/VF compared to 29% in patients withoutinducible VT/VF (P<0·05) A favourable drug regimen(response to drug and no intolerable side effects) was obtainedby serial drug testing in 25 of all 102 patients (25%). A cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 32 patients, in 63% ofwhom discharges were observed during 18±11 months offollow-up; only one patient (3%) died suddenly. Thus, in patients with DCM, there was no relationship betweendocumented and inducible ventricular tachzyarrhythmias, andinitiation of sustained VT or VF had little prognostic valuefor the prediction of subsequent sudden death. Wherever antiarrhythmic drug therapy was of limited value, implantationof an ICD may improve the prognosis of these high risk patients.