Sputum levels of reduced glutathione increase 24 hours after allergen challenge in isolated early, but not dual asthmatic responders

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of late asthmatic reactions after allergen challenge in contrast to isolated early responses is incompletely understood. Recently, the antioxidant glutathione and endogenous nitrosothiols were shown to protect against bronchoconstriction. We compared reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and nitrosothiols in induced sputum following allergen challenge in mild asthmatics with isolated early (EAR) and dual early and late (LAR) asthmatic responses. METHODS: Exhaled nitric oxide, sputum cells and sputum supernatant concentrations of GSH, GSSG and nitrosothiols were quantified 2-5 days prior to and 24 h after allergen challenge in 24 mild asthmatics (12 EAR, 12 LAR, only beta-agonists prn). RESULTS: There were no differences at baseline between EAR and LAR asthmatics for any of the parameters (p > 0.1, all comparisons). Mean +/- SD fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, expressed as the percentage decrease compared to the baseline value, between 3 and 8 h after allergen challenge was 1 +/- 5% in the group of patients without LAR vs. 24.9 +/- 8.7% in the group of patients with LAR (p < 0.001). Sputum eosinophils increased in both groups (p < 0.05, both comparisons), whereas neutrophils only increased in LAR subjects (p = 0.06 vs. EAR). In contrast, GSH was significantly increased 24 h after challenge only in EAR asthmatics [geometric mean with 95% confidence intervals: before: 3.3 microM (1.25-7.9 microM), after: 5.9 microM (2.7-12.9 microM), p = 0.05; mean difference vs. LAR subjects: 6 microM (0.1-12 microM), p = 0.048], and the proportion of GSSG was positively correlated with postallergen eosinophils in all patients (rho = 0.4, p = 0.05). There was no change in nitrosothiols after 24 h in either EAR or LAR subjects (p > 0.23, all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: GSH increases 24 h after allergen challenge in isolated early responders. These data suggest that different adoptive responses to allergen may result in different physiologic phenotypes. Further studies on the role of glutathione in allergen-induced bronchoconstriction are clearly warranted.     

The effect of montelukast (MK-0476), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum cell counts in asthma

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes are capable of inducing chemotaxis of eosinophils in vitro and within the airways of animals and humans in vivo. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that montelukast (MK-0476), a potent cysLT1 receptor antagonist, would protect against allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses by virtue of anti-inflammatory properties. Hence, we studied the effect of pretreatment with oral montelukast on allergen-induced airway responses. As an exploratory endpoint, changes in inflammatory cell differentials and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated in hypertonic saline-induced sputum. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic men (20-34 years, FEV1 79-109% predicted, histamine PC20FEV1 <4 mg/mL) with dual responses to inhaled house dust mite extract participated in a two-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Three oral doses of montelukast (10 mg) or matching placebo were administered 36 and 12 h before, and 12 h post-allergen. The airway response to allergen was measured by FEV1, and the EAR and LAR were expressed as the corresponding areas under the time-response curves (AUC0-3 h and AUC3-8h, respectively). During each study period, sputum was induced with 4.5% NaCl 24 h before and 24 h after a standardized allergen challenge. Processed whole sputum cytospins were stained with Giemsa, and cell counts expressed as percentage nonsquamous cells. ECP was measured by FEIA in sputum supernatants. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. The changes in baseline FEV1 were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.183). Montelukast significantly inhibited the EAR and LAR, reducing the AUC0-3h by 75.4% (P<0.001) and the AUC3-8h by 56.9% (P = 0.003) as compared with placebo. Sputa of nine subjects could be included in the analysis (<80% squamous cells). Allergen challenge significantly increased sputum eosinophils after placebo (mean change +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 5.8%, P = 0.038), with a similar trend after montelukast (mean change +/- SD: 4.1 +/- 5.4%; P = 0.056). The allergen-induced changes in sputum eosinophils and ECP, however, were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.652 and P = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that oral montelukast protects against allergen-induced early and late airway responses in asthma. However, using the present dosing and sample size, this protection was not accompanied with changes in sputum eosinophil percentage or activity, which may require more prolonged pretreatment with cysLT1 receptor antagonists.     

Differential effects of fluticasone and montelukast on allergen-induced asthma

Early asthmatic responses (EAR) and late asthmatic responses (LAR) to allergen are induced by the local release of a series of bronchoconstrictor mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine. Both anti-leukotrienes and other anti-asthma drugs, such as inhaled glucocorticoids, have been shown to reduce both EAR and LAR. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the effects of regular treatment with an oral anti-leukotriene, montelukast (Mont; 10 mg once daily, for 8 days), and an inhaled glucocorticoid [fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily for 8 days] on the EAR and LAR to an inhaled allergen challenge. Patients with a documented EAR and LAR at a screening visit were randomized to these treatments, or placebo, in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Allergen challenge at a dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the eighth day of treatment. The maximum fall in FEV1 during the EAR was 17.8% during placebo treatment, 8.3% during Mont and 16.3% during FP (P <0.05 for Mont vs placebo). The maximum fall during the EAR was 13.8% during placebo treatment, 11.8% during Mont and 2% during FP treatment (P <0.05 for FP vs placebo and FP vs Mont). PC20 methacholine was significantly higher 24 h after allergen challenge during FP-treatment compared with Mont (P <0.05). Both montelukast and fluticasone reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils after allergen compared with placebo treatment. This study shows that anti-leukotrienes are effective to attenuate the EAR, whereas inhaled glucocorticoids are more effective than anti-leukotrienes in attenuating the EARs and improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a greater extent. In conclusion, inhaled glucocorticoids have overall greater efficacy than oral anti-leukotrienes to attenuate allergen-induced airway responses in mild asthmatic patients.     

Early increase in urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) is dependent on allergen dose inhaled during bronchial challenge in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: Urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) excretion is a good marker of the rate of total body production of sulfidopeptide leukotrienes released during allergen challenge. METHODS: Twenty-three subjects with allergic asthma were challenged with inhaled allergen, and the urinary excretion of LTE4 was determined by immunoenzymatic assay (associated with HPLC separation) at various intervals after challenge. RESULTS: Allergen challenge caused an early airway response (EAR) with a drop in FEV1 of 40.3+/-9.9%. This was associated with an increase in urine LTE4 excretion for 0-3 h after allergen inhalation (296+/-225.25 pg/mg creatinine) in comparison with baseline values obtained during the night before challenge (101.02+/-61.97 pg/mg creatinine). Urinary LTE4 excretion was significantly higher in subjects who inhaled a higher dose of allergen during challenge (LTE4 during EAR: 211+/-192 pg/mg creatinine in subjects with inhaled total dose of allergen <0.1 biologic units; 408+/-223 pg/mg creatinine in subjects with inhaled total dose >0.1 biologic units). All subjects showed a late airway response (LAR) to allergen of different severity, from mild (FEV1 fall: 15-20%) to severe (>30%); no correlation was found between the increase in urine LTE4 excreted during LAR (3-7 h after challenge) and the severity of LAR, but only subjects with severe LAR showed a significant increase in LTE4 during LAR in comparison with baseline value. CONCLUSIONS: A release of sulfidopeptide leukotrienes, as evaluated by urinary LTE4 excretion, can be documented during EAR and LAR to allergen in relation to the dose of inhaled allergen, and it can represent a useful index of the events underlying the airway inflammatory responses during allergen challenge.     

Magnitude of late asthmatic response to allergen in relation to baseline and allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia in mild asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen challenge is a validated method for studying the pathogenesis of and new treatments for asthma in the laboratory. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR and clinical and biological determinants, including sputum and blood eosinophil percentages and eosinophil cationic protein concentrations. METHODS: Thirty-eight untreated mild asthmatic patients (mean age, 21.2 years) were selected for the presence of allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) and LAR. Each patient measured methacholine responsiveness (provocation dose that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% [PD20FEV1]) at baseline, differential blood cell counts and eosinophil cationic protein levels in blood and induced sputum, and serum neutrophil chemotactic activity at baseline and 24 hours after allergen challenge. RESULTS: A correlation was found between LAR (as area under the curve [AUC]) and sputum eosinophil percentages at baseline (r = 0.51; P = .001) and 24 hours after allergen challenge (r = 0.44; P < .007). Furthermore, we found significant correlations between AUC LAR and AUC EAR, baseline methacholine PD20FEV1, baseline blood eosinophil percentages, and baseline serum neutrophil chemotactic activity. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the stronger determinants of AUC LAR were baseline sputum eosinophilia and AUC EAR. CONCLUSION: Baseline sputum eosinophilia and functional findings are determinants of the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR.     

Effect of ciclesonide on allergen challenge in subjects with bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND: The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate whether repeated inhalation of the new inhaled steroid ciclesonide reduces the early-phase (EAR) and late-phase (LAR) reactions after allergen challenge in patients with mild allergic asthma. Also, this study provides further data on safety and tolerance of ciclesonide. METHODS: The study was designed as a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial. Following a baseline period, patients were randomized to either of two treatment sequences (ciclesonide/placebo, placebo/ciclesonide) each of which lasted for one week and were separated by 3-5 weeks from the alternate treatment sequence. Patients received 800 micro g ciclesonide twice daily by means of a Cyclohaler. At the end of each treatment patients were subjected to an allergen challenge. RESULTS: Thirteen asthmatic patients (mean FEV1 of 91% predicted) who experienced an EAR and LAR after allergen challenge participated in the study. The time-average FEV1 decreases 0-2 h (2-12 h) after allergen challenge as measure of the EAR (LAR) were significantly reduced (P < 0.05, one-sided) from 0.426 L to 0.233 L (EAR) and from 0.443 L to 0.213 L (LAR), respectively. Thus, the study results suggest that ciclesonide significantly lowered the extent of EAR and LAR compared to placebo. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and no drug-related adverse events were reported. Cortisol excretion in 24-h urine showed no significant difference between ciclesonide and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide.     

Influence of a single antigenic challenge on the pattern of airway response to exercise in asthma.

We studied 14 atopic subjects with mild asthma (six men and eight females) to document whether allergen exposure can change the pattern of response to exercise. Each had an exercise test at 80% of the VO2 max for six minutes before (exercise 1) and 48 hours (exercise 2) after an allergen inhalation test (AIT). FEV1 was measured at regular intervals up to eight hours after each challenge. On the day following AIT, spontaneous changes in FEV1 were measured for eight hours (control day). Airway responsiveness (AR) to histamine was measured at the beginning of the study, then 24 hours after AIT and at the end of the 2nd exercise. Mean early fall in FEV1 after exercise 1, AIT and exercise 2 were, 24.9 +/- 3.2%, 24.5 +/- 2.2%, and 27.6 +/- 3.8%, respectively. Airway responsiveness to histamine was increased at 32 and 56 hours post-AIT with a mean PC20 (SEM) of 0.50 (0.40, 0.62) and 0.93 (0.74, 1.17) mg/mL compared with 1.87 (1.33, 2.61) at baseline (P less than .05). Allergen inhalation test induced an isolated early asthmatic response (EAR) in four subjects, an equivocal response (late fall in FEV1: 5% to 15%) in four and a definite late asthmatic response (LAR) in six. No subject had a LAR before the AIT but two with a LAR after allergen exposure developed a late response to exercise after the AIT. This last was only partly explained by an increased diurnal variation of expiratory flows.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antiinflammatory-antioxidant treatment with a methane sulfonanilide in allergen-induced asthma.

Two groups of six asthmatic patients with biphasic bronchospastic response to inhaled Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergen extract were studied in a double-blind fashion. Early and late asthmatic reactions to allergen inhalation challenge were determined before and at the end of a 2-week treatment period with nimesulide (100 mg bid orally), a sulfonanilide with antioxidant properties, or placebo. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was evaluated 24 hours before and after allergen inhalation challenges. The dose of allergen causing EAR (15% decrease in FEV1) and the severity of LAR (maximum FEV1 fall) were similar before and at the end of the treatment period in both groups. In patients treated with nimesulide, bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was significantly increased after allergen inhalation challenge both before and at the end of the treatment period. These results do not support the hypothesis that the production of oxygen-free radicals plays a significant role in the development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and late phase reaction to allergen in asthma.     

The effect of a single inhaled dose of a VLA-4 antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.     

The inhibitory effect of terfenadine and flurbiprofen on early and late-phase bronchoconstriction following allergen challenge in atopic asthma

We have studied the effect of cyclo-oxygenase inhibition and H1-receptor antagonism on the early and late bronchoconstrictor responses to inhaled allergen in mild atopic asthmatics. In the first phase of the study histamine inhalation challenge tests were performed in seven mild, atopic asthmatics 2 h after treatment with placebo or flurbiprofen (50, 100 or 150 mg). Flurbiprofen in these single doses had no effect on histamine reactivity. Ten atopic asthmatics participated in the second phase of the study in which the time course of the bronchoconstrictor response to inhalation of allergen was observed on four separate occasions after treatment with (a) placebo, (b) flurbiprofen, 150 mg, (c) terfenadine 180 mg, and (d) the combination of flurbiprofen and terfenadine. On each occasion subjects inhaled a concentration of allergen (Dermatagaphoides pteronyssinus, grass pollen) that had previously been shown to produce a 30% fall in FEV1 (PC30 allergen). The mean maximum fall in FEV1 during the early reaction was 33.2 +/- 3.3% from the post-saline baseline value following placebo and this was reduced to 27.5 +/- 5.3% after flurbiprofen (n.s.), 20.3 +/- 3.2% after terfenadine (P less than 0.05), and 23.1 +/- 2.3 after the treatment combination (P less than 0.05). Seven subjects developed late asthmatic reactions (LAR) after placebo and in these subjects the mean maximum fall in PEFR during the LAR was reduced from 22.6 +/- 3.1% after placebo to 16.7 +/- 3.2% after flurbiprofen (P less than 0.05), 15.2 +/- 2.3% after terfenadine (P less than 0.05) and 11.5 +/- 3.1% after the treatment combination (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dual asthmatic reactions to inhaled Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus: reproducibility and antagonism by cromolyn sodium

Twenty-four asthmatic patients sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were challenged with a standardized extract of this allergen. All the patients selected on the basis of skin tests and RAST, had an early asthmatic reaction (EAR). Seventeen of them also had a late asthmatic reaction (LAR). Eleven patients were rechallenged in order to study the reproducibility of both EAR and LAR. Six patients were also challenged after cromolyn sodium premedication Results show that (1) reproducibility of both EAR and LAR is satisfactory (coefficient of variation = 14%), (2) patients with reproducible EAR also have reproducible LAR, and (3) a single dose of cromolyn given before challenge can prevent EAR and markedly attenuate LAR.     

Effect of IVL745, a VLA-4 antagonist, on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Very late antigen (VLA-4) antagonists have been proposed as potential therapies for diseases in which cell recruitment and accumulation are causative. Asthma, which is characterized by airway inflammation involving the accumulation of eosinophils and mononuclear cells, is one such disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effect of IVL745, a VLA-4 antagonist, on the early and late asthmatic response (LAR) and on markers of airway inflammation after allergen inhalation. METHODS: The study was of a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, 2-way crossover design. Sixteen subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma controlled with short-acting beta2-agonists only and with a LAR to inhaled allergen participated in the study. At one treatment period they took 20 mg of IVL745 and one treatment period placebo. Both treatments were taken twice daily for 7 days, with a single dose on day 8. Treatments were separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. On day 7 of each treatment period, sputum was induced and collected, and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) was measured. On day 8, an inhaled bolus allergen challenge was performed, and blood was taken for pharmacokinetics. On day 9, exhaled NO was measured, and a methacholine challenge was done. On day 10, sputum was induced and collected. Adverse events, peak expiratory flow (PEF), use of short-acting beta2-agonists, and asthma symptoms were recorded daily throughout the study. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between IVL745 and placebo in the effect on the LAR after allergen challenge, as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage change in FEV1 from the prechallenge baseline (mean [SEM], -81.99 [18.80] after IVL745 and -72.58 [21.29] after placebo; 95% CI of difference, -36 to 16.8; P = .46) or by the maximum percentage change from the prechallenge baseline (mean [SEM], -23.44 [4.73] after IVL745 and -21.30 [5.17] after placebo; 95% CI of difference, -11 to 6.29; P = .60). There was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of eosinophils in sputum on day 7 of treatment with IVL745 (mean [SEM], 7.32 [1.46]) compared with placebo (mean [SEM], 15.00 [1.92]; 95% CI of difference, -13 to -1.2; P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference between IVL745 and placebo with respect to the early asthmatic response, methacholine hyperresponsiveness, exhaled NO, postallergen sputum, symptoms, inhaled beta2-agonist use, or PEF. CONCLUSION: In patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma, IVL745 did not affect the early and late response to inhaled allergen or markers of airway inflammation, except for a modest reduction in sputum eosinophils.     

The effect of an inhaled leukotriene antagonist, L-648,051, on early and late asthmatic reactions and subsequent increase in airway responsiveness in man

We have investigated the protective effects of the inhaled cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist, L-648,051, on allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) and late asthmatic response (LAR) and the subsequent changes in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Ten atopic men with asthma participated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. All subjects had documented EAR and LAR to house dust-mite extract. Responsiveness to methacholine was measured the day before and the day after a standardized allergen-challenge test. L-648,051 was inhaled in two doses of 12 mg 20 minutes before and 3 hours after the allergen challenge. The response was obtained from FEV1 and flows from maximal (V40m) and partial (V40p) expiratory flow-volume curves. All subjects had an EAR and LAR during placebo therapy, but only a minority demonstrated an increase in methacholine responsiveness of more than one doubling dose. The ratio of V40m to V40p during methacholine challenge was higher than during both EAR and LAR (p less than 0.05). There was no difference between drug- and placebo-therapy periods in baseline function, EAR, LAR, ratio of V40m to V40p, and the allergen-induced hyperresponsiveness (p greater than 0.1). These results indicate that an effective aerosolized leukotriene antagonist in man does not protect against allergen-induced airflow obstruction, despite the evidence of an inflammatory response to allergen challenge. This suggests that either the potency or duration of activity of L-648,051 is limited or that leukotrienes C4 and D4 do not play a causative role in human allergic asthma.     

Inhibition of mast cell tryptase by inhaled APC 366 attenuates allergen-induced late-phase airway obstruction in asthma

BACKGROUND: APC 366, a selective inhibitor of mast cell tryptase, has been shown to inhibit antigen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR), late asthmatic response (LAR), and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in a sheep model of allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of APC 366 on antigen-induced EAR, LAR, and BHR in mild atopic asthmatics not on any anti-inflammatory therapy. METHODS: Sixteen mild atopic asthmatics, each with a demonstrable antigen-induced EAR, LAR, and BHR to histamine, were recruited into this randomized, double-blinded, crossover study. APC 366 (5 mg)/placebo was administered by aerosol inhalation 3 times per day on treatment days 1 through 4. Allergen challenge was carried out on day 4. Histamine challenge was performed the following morning, 1 hour after final dosing. RESULTS: Subjects were shown to have a significantly smaller overall mean area under the curve for the LAR (P =.012) and mean maximum fall in FEV(1) for the LAR (P =.007) after pretreatment with APC 366 in comparison with placebo. No significant effects on BHR were demonstrable. Although the EAR was reduced by 18% after treatment with APC 366 in comparison with placebo, this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Short-term repeated administration of APC 366 significantly reduced the magnitude of antigen-induced LAR in atopic asthmatics, which supports the role of mast cell tryptase in the pathophysiology of the LAR.     

Urinary leukotriene E4 levels during early and late asthmatic responses

The sulphidopeptide leukotrienes C4 and D4 (LTC4, LTD4) are potent bronchoconstrictor mediators, released from human lung fragments after challenge with specific allergens in vitro. The purpose of this study was to measure urinary LTE4 (metabolite of LTC4 and LTD4) in subjects undergoing inhalation challenges with allergens or occupational sensitizing agents in the laboratory. Eighteen subjects with previously documented isolated early asthmatic responses (EARs), isolated late asthmatic responses (LARs), or dual (both early and late) asthmatic responses were studied. Urinary LTE4 levels increased in subjects who developed either isolated EARs (mean fall in FEV1, 27.98%) or early responses preceding LARs (mean fall in FEV1, 15.01%). The baseline levels of LTE4 were 150.26 (SEM, 49.5) pg/mg of creatinine in the isolated responders and 66.60 (SEM, 13.5) pg/mg of creatinine in the dual responders. These levels increased to 1816 (SEM, 606.1) pg/mg of creatinine (p = 0.041) and 174.80 (SEM, 40.1) pg/mg of creatinine (p = 0.025), respectively, after the EAR. The degree of maximal bronchoconstriction during the EAR correlated with the levels of LTE4 (r = 0.68; p = 0.001). No significant increase in urinary LTE4 levels occurred during the LAR. These results suggest that the LTE4 precursors, LTC4 and LTD4, are important bronchoconstrictor mediators causing EARs after allergen inhalation.     

The effect of repirinast on airway responsiveness to methacholine and allergen.

Repirinast, a novel ingested antiallergic asthma medication from Japan, was compared versus placebo on airway responsiveness to methacholine and was compared versus placebo and cromolyn on airway responses to allergen. In 14 patients with mild, stable, atopic asthma, we performed a double-blind, double-dummy, random-order trial with ingested repirinast 300 mg twice daily for 7 days, inhaled cromolyn 40 mg spincaps single dose, and double placebo on allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses and increased airway responsiveness. In the 14 subjects, no difference occurred in methacholine PC20 after 6 days of repirinast or 6 days of placebo. In the 13 subjects who completed the allergen study, single-dose cromolyn significantly reduced the EAR by 63% and the LAR by 65% versus placebo (p < 0.02); repirinast was not significantly different from placebo, both the EAR and LAR being reduced by less than 10%. Allergen-induced increase in methacholine responsiveness was borderline (p = 0.052), and no significant drug effects occurred. In these models, a 1-week treatment period with repirinast, like other oral antiallergic asthma medications (e.g., ketotifen, fumarate), provides no protection against airway responses to methacholine or allergen.     

Usefulness of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergen extract from the Allergopharma J.G. Company for bronchial provocation in patients with bronchial asthma

The value of Dpt allergen extract, produced by Allergopharma J.G., for performance of the bronchial provocation test in asthmatics was evaluated. The studies were carried out in 40 asthmatics with positive skin prick test with Dpt. Bronchial provocation test was performed according to Ryan's method. After an allergen inhalation, an early asthmatic reaction (EAR) and late asthmatic reaction (LAR) may appear. The following results were observed: a dual asthmatic reaction (EAR and LAR)--in 19 persons, the EAR--only in 9 patients, and the LAR--only in 1 patient. The negative result of the provocation were found in 11 patients. The frequency of particular patterns of the bronchial reactions was similar to those published before by us and other authors, with different allergen extracts. The allergen extract of Dpt from Allergopharma J.G. can be used to bronchial challenge.     

The effect of nedocromil sodium on the early and late reaction and allergen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine was studied in 14 patients with asthma and five healthy control subjects, with and without pretreatment with nedocromil sodium, 3 and 24 hours after allergen challenge. Eleven patients demonstrated a dual asthmatic response. A significant decrease in the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 was found from a geometric mean starting value of 1.18 mg/ml on the control day to 0.24 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) and to 0.17 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) 3 and 24 hours after allergen challenge. A significant correlation was observed between the increased BHR at 3 hours and the magnitude of the late response (r = -0.57; p less than 0.05). Nedocromil sodium (6 mg) significantly inhibited the increase in BHR, 1 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) at 3 hours and 0.50 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) at 24 hours. Nedocromil sodium shifted the severity of the early allergic reaction (EAR) from mean -34.8% to -6.9% and inhibited the later allergic reaction (LAR) from -30.5% to +0.4% (p less than 0.005). From the study can be concluded that nedocromil sodium inhibits the EAR and LAR and the allergen-induced increase in BHR. The inhibitory effect of nedocromil sodium on the LAR may be related to its ability to inhibit the increased BHR before the development of the LAR.     

The effect of inhaled allergen on circulating basophils in atopic asthma.

There is increasing evidence for the role of basophils in the allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR). To study the effect of inhaled allergen on basophil function in subjects with asthma, ex vivo basophil spontaneous histamine release (SHR) in peripheral blood and plasma histamine was measured before and 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after allergen bronchial challenge (allergen study day) in six subjects with atopic asthma. Allergen inhalation induced an early response and LAR consisting of a mean (+/- SD) 32.5% (+/- 7.9%) and 28.8% (+/- 7.7%) fall in FEV1, respectively. As a control for the effects of bronchoconstriction, on another occasion, methacholine challenge was performed to produce a mean 33.4% (+/- 3.4%) fall in FEV1 during the early response and no LAR, and blood was obtained to measure basophil histamine release (HR) and plasma histamine. There was a small, but significant (p less than 0.05), rise in median SHR from 4.6% to 6.1% of total basophil histamine after allergen but not after methacholine inhalation. HR remained high after allergen inhalation during the 8 hours of study, whereas it demonstrated a steady, significant, decrease between 4 to 8 hours after methacholine inhalation. No significant changes in plasma histamine were recorded on either allergen or methacholine study days. On a third occasion, SHR was measured after challenge with physiologic saline to control for any effects of methacholine on SHR, and a decrease in HR was recorded during the day similar to HR observed after methacholine challenge. These studies suggest an enhancing effect of inhaled allergen on SHR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of two doses of cromolyn on allergen-induced late asthmatic response and increased responsiveness

We selected five atopic children with asthma with previously documented late asthmatic response (LAR) associated with increased hyperresponsiveness to methacholine after the inhalation of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. The children had four allergen inhalation tests on 4 different days, at least 14 days apart. On days 1 and 4, saline placebo was inhaled 1 hour before the expected onset of LAR, and FEV1 was measured hourly until FEV1 returned within 10% of baseline value; then methacholine challenge was performed. On days 2 and 3, 20 and 40 mg of cromolyn was inhaled double blind 1 hour before the expected onset of LAR. FEV1 and methacholine responsiveness were measured as on days 1 and 4. The two doses of cromolyn significantly delayed the LAR onset without altering the overall LAR magnitude and prevented the allergen-induced increase in methacholine responsiveness. Both these effects were greater at the maximal dose used. We conclude that cromolyn can prevent the allergen-induced increase in methacholine responsiveness and that this effect is not due to alteration in the magnitude of LAR. Our findings reveal a possible explanation of the effectiveness of this drug in the treatment of allergic asthma.