Lack of ability of ciprofloxacin-rifampin prophylaxis to decrease infection-related morbidity in neutropenic patients given cytotoxic therapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

We compared ciprofloxacin alone with ciprofloxacin plus rifampin (C + R) as a prophylactic antibacterial regimen for 40 patients with solid tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation support. No differences were found between groups in the time elapsed to the onset of fever, incidence of febrile episodes, amphotericin B use, and length of hospital stay. However, C + R combination prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of gram-positive bacteremia (five versus zero episodes) but was associated with a higher incidence of drug-related side effects.     

氟康唑预防血液病患者真菌感染的疗效分析

目的评价接受大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植（HSCT）患者氟康唑200~400 mg口服或静脉预防真菌感染的疗效。方法总结2008至2009年上海市瑞金医院骨髓移植病区35例血液恶性疾病患者42例次大剂量化疗和自体HSCT,采用氟康唑200-400 mg口服或静脉预防真菌感染直至粒细胞缺乏得以恢复,所有粒细胞缺乏伴发热的患者均接受广谱抗菌药物治疗,结合高分辨计算机断层扫描（CT）和真菌病原学检测即曲霉半乳甘露聚糖（GM）抗原和1-3-β-D葡聚糖（BDG）抗原的检测结果,调整、指导临床的抗真菌治疗。结果本试验入组患者的外周血白细胞（WBC）计数谷值的中位数为0.1×10^9/L[（0.1-0.5）×10^9/L]。粒细胞缺乏（中性粒细胞〈0.5×10^9/L）持续时间的中位数为9 d（2-21 d）,大剂量化疗组和自体HSCT组间差异无统计学意义（P=0.36）。6例次（14.3%）从未出现粒细胞缺乏伴发热事件,36例次（85.7%）出现了粒细胞缺乏伴发热事件,发热持续时间的中位数为4.5 d（1-13 d）,大剂量化疗组和自体HSCT组患者中粒细胞缺乏伴发热的发生率差异无统计学意义（P=0.38）。其中7例虽经广谱抗菌药物经验性治疗,但仍持续发热7 d以上,GM/BDG试验动态观察和胸部CT扫描,尚无1例达到侵袭性真菌感染（IFI）的临床诊断和确诊标准。总共只有3例接受经验性广谱抗真菌的治疗,占粒细胞缺乏伴发热患者的8.3%。结论对于接受阿糖胞苷为主的大剂量化疗和自体HSCT的血液恶性疾病患者,与接受异体HSCT治疗患者不同,其曲霉感染的风险相对比较低。因此应用氟康唑作预防治疗即可达到满意的预防真菌感染疗效,无需应用广谱抗真菌药物进行预防治疗。     

Treatment of febrile neutropenia with cefepime monotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The empirical administration of a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic, either as monotherapy or in combination with an aminoglycoside, is an essential component of the initial management of patients with fever and severe neutropenia. Multiple antibiotics have been tested for this indication. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with in vitro activity against most gram-negative and many gram-positive bacteria. We have studied the use of this agent as monotherapy in this indication. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six episodes of febrile neutropenia in 98 adults with hematological malignancies were treated with cefepime monotherapy. Cefepime was given at a dose of 2 g every 8 h i.v. Most episodes (49%) were fever of unexplained origin, while a microbiologically documented and clinically documented infection occurred in 25% episodes each. Seventy-six (61%) episodes occurred after conventional chemotherapy, while 51 (41%) after a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Results: Twelve episodes (10%) were not evaluable for response. Among the 114 evaluable episodes, 69 (55% of the initial sample and 61% of those evaluable) responded to cefepime monotherapy, while therapy failed in 45 cases (36% of the initial sample and 39% of those evaluable), including 14 cases who developed breakthrough bacteremia during therapy. There were no deaths due to bacterial infection. At the end of all antibiotic therapy (final outcome) 69 episodes were cured only with monotherapy, 47 were cured with modification of therapy and 10 patients died from an unrelated cause. The only variable that appeared to correlate with response to therapy was the duration of neutropenia, which was longer among patients who failed or developed breakthrough bacteremia than among those who responded to monotherapy. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Initial empirical antibiotic therapy with cefepime as a single agent in patients with febrile neutropenia and a hematological malignancy is effective, but patients with prolonged neutropenia appear to be at higher risk for failure. However, with appropriate therapeutic changes the risk of dying from a bacterial infection is very low.     

Clinical features of febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infection in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: Comparison to those in intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia

BackgroundIn autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), myelosuppression and mucosal damage are more severe than those in conventional chemotherapy because of high-dose chemotherapy, but the duration of neutropenia is shorter due to stem cell rescue.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated febrile neutropenia (FN) and bloodstream infection (BSI) in 208 patients who underwent their first autologous HCT at our institution between 2007 and 2019. They were compared to those in patients who underwent intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (130 induction/salvage and 191 consolidation).ResultsThe median neutropenic period in autologous HCT, AML induction/salvage and consolidation was 9, 26.5, and 19 days, respectively. The incidence of FN was 93.8%, 92.3%, and 81.7%, and that of BSI in initial FN was 7.2%, 7.5% and 26.3%, respectively. The incidence of oral mucositis (≥ grade 2) was 63.1%, 9.2% and 12.2%, and that of diarrhea (≥ grade 2) was 53.3%, 9.2% and 6.4%, respectively. Although there were significant differences in the incidence of shaking chills, the degree of fever and the value of CRP between patients with and without BSI in initial FN of AML chemotherapy, no significant risk factors or predictive factors for BSI were identified in autologous HCT.ConclusionsThe profile of infectious complications in autologous HCT was characterized by a high incidence of FN maybe due to mucosal damage. On the other hand, the incidence of BSI was lower compared to that in AML consolidation chemotherapy.     

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: a possible diagnostic marker for Gram-negative bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients

Objective Cancer patients with febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy have a variable risk of bacterial infection. Especially Gram-negative bacteremia is associated with high mortality and/or morbidity. Early diagnosis of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia at the onset of febrile neutropenia is potentially useful in tailoring therapy.Design and setting Prospective study at the Department of Pediatric Oncology and Internal Medicine of a university hospital.Patients Were analyzed 66 febrile neutropenic episodes in 57 adults and children. Patients were divided into four groups: those with Gram-negative bacteremia, Gram-positive bacteremia, clinical sepsis, or fever of unknown origin.Measurements and results Plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were determined. LBP at the onset of febrile neutropenia was significantly higher in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia than those with fever of unknown origin and those with Gram-positive bacteremia. Using a cutoff value for LBP proved to have much greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for Gram-negative bacteremia than the best cutoff value for CRP.Conclusions An initial high LBP level might predict Gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. These results may have potential clinical impact by allowing therapy to be initiated for these patients at a very early stage.This study was supported by a grant from the University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands     

The outpatient management of low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia: risk assessment over the telephone

Objective The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the feasibility of the risk assessment over the telephone in the outpatient management of low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia. Materials and methods Febrile patients with neutropenia were eligible for outpatient management with oral ciprofloxacin if they demonstrated the following characteristics: resolution of neutropenia expected in <10 days, good performance status, controlled cancer, no symptoms or signs suggesting systemic infection other than fever, and no comorbidity requiring hospitalization. Eligible patients received oral ciprofloxacin (400 mg, three times daily) and were monitored as far as possible by telephone. Risk assessment concerning general condition was carried out over the telephone. Results Of the 60 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a phase II trial of docetaxel (60 mg/m²) and doxorubicin (50 mg/m²) for primary breast cancer, 30 low-risk febrile patients received oral ciprofloxacin. Twenty-seven of these patients (90%) recovered uneventfully without hospitalization and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Treatment was considered to have failed in the remaining three (10%) on the account of the need to modify or change their regimens. Conclusions For carefully selected low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia, risk assessment over the telephone may be convenient, and close daily medical scrutiny may be not routinely required in the outpatient.     

Outpatient high-dose melphalan in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND: The brief period of neutropenia and limited nonmarrow toxicity after high-dose melphalan (HDM) provide a rationale for outpatient treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our experience with HDM (140-200 mg/m(2)) in 90 consecutive transplant episodes was retrospectively reviewed. Most patients were treated in an outpatient setting. Patients without a primary care provider (PCP) were electively admitted before the anticipated onset of neutropenia. Ceftriaxone was added to ciprofloxacin at the onset of neutropenia. All febrile patients were admitted. RESULTS: The median time from peripheral blood progenitor cell infusion to onset of neutropenia was 5 days (range, 4-6 days), and the mean duration of neutropenia was 5 days (range, 4-7 days). Thirty-eight transplants (42%) were performed entirely in the outpatient setting. The mean duration of hospitalization was 2.2 days in patients not electively admitted. The use of ceftriaxone was associated with a decreased risk for fever (39% vs. 79%) and reduced duration of hospitalization (1.6 days vs. 4.5 days) for nonelectively admitted patients. There was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory therapy with HDM is safe and can be achieved in a general outpatient setting. The predictable time to neutropenia allows even poor candidates for outpatient therapy to be admitted electively on Day +4. The apparent beneficial effect of ceftriaxone needs to be confirmed in randomized trials.     

Emergency Department evaluation of patients with fever and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

We sought to describe the common causes of infection in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with elevated temperature and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to determine the frequency with which the ED diagnosis of infection is consistent with the final hospital discharge diagnosis. We performed a structured restrospective chart review of ED patients with fever (T > 38 degrees C) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1000/mm(3)) over a 2-year period. Fifty-five episodes of neutropenic fever occurred in 52 patients (mean age 52 years, range 18-86 years; 53% men). Twenty-six patients (47%) were found to have a specific infection identified. Of these, 21/26 (81%; 95% CI, 70-91%) had the source of infection identified while in the ED. All patients who had a focal site of infection identified during their hospitalization were diagnosed in the ED (100%; 95% CI, 86-100%). The other 5 patients, without a source identified in the ED, were found to have bacteremia. The 29 patients without a source identified in the ED were hospitalized and had negative blood and urine cultures and were discharged to home after resolution of fever. A thorough history, physical examination, chest radiograph and urinalysis in the ED identified all patients with a focus of infection. Meticulous ED evaluation of patients with neutropenia and fever may be sufficient to diagnose most sources of infection; however, a significant number of patients without an identifiable focus may have bacteremia.     

Serious Bacterial Infections in Febrile Outpatient Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile outpatient pediatric heart transplant recipients and to assess the utility of using white blood cell (WBC) indices to identify patients at low risk for bacteremia. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all heart transplant recipients followed at a single children’s hospital. All outpatient visits from January 1, 1995, to June 1, 2007, in which fever was evaluated were reviewed. Patients with history of a primary immunodeficiency, receiving concurrent chemotherapy, or having had a stem cell or small bowel transplant were excluded. Demographic, historical, physical examination, laboratory, and radiographic data were then recorded. Results: Sixty‐nine patients had 238 individual episodes of fever evaluation; of these, 217 (91.2%) had blood cultures drawn with results available in their initial evaluation. There were six (2.8%) true‐positive blood cultures and eight (3.7%) false‐positive cultures. Chest radiography was done in 185 evaluations (77.8%), and 44 episodes of pneumonia (23.8%) were diagnosed. Of 112 urine cultures done, one (0.9%) was positive. Neither of two lumbar punctures performed were positive. In non–ill‐appearing children without indwelling central lines or focal bacterial infections (pneumonia, cellulitis), the incidence of bacteremia was 1.2%. In children with a focal bacterial infection, the rate of bacteremia was 6.3%. WBC indices were not significantly different between bacteremic and nonbacteremic patients. A band‐to‐neutrophil ratio (BNR) of ≥0.25 and a published guideline for identifying low‐risk infants using WBC indices identified all bacteremic patients, each with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48% to 100% and 54% to 100%, respectively). Conclusions: The incidence of bacteremia was low in febrile, outpatient pediatric heart transplant patients, especially in those who were not ill‐appearing and did not have a focus of serious infection. Two different low‐risk criteria performed well in identifying the bacteremic patients, although given the low number of true‐positive cultures, the CIs for the sensitivities of these tests were extremely wide, and neither test could be reliably used at present. A prospective multicenter study is required to confirm the low incidence of bacteremia and low‐risk criteria in this population.     

Ofloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for prevention of infection in neutropenic patients following cytotoxic chemotherapy.

The efficacy of ofloxacin in preventing infection in neutropenic patients following cytotoxic chemotherapy was evaluated and was compared with that of co-trimoxazole. A total of 102 patients with hematological malignancies were randomly selected to receive either co-trimoxazole or ofloxacin. All patients were monitored for compliance, occurrence of infection, and drug-related side effects. A surveillance culture of a rectal swab was performed regularly. A total of 25 of the 52 patients (48%) who received co-trimoxazole and 11 of the 50 patients (22%) who received ofloxacin developed fever during the study period (P less than 0.025). Gram-negative bacteremia occurred in nine patients in the co-trimoxazole group (17%) but in only one patient (2%) in the ofloxacin group (P less than 0.05). No patient in either group had documented gram-positive bacterial or Pneumocystis carinii infection. Poor performance status was the only identifiable factor associated with an increased incidence of bacteremia. The surveillance study showed that significantly fewer bacterial strains were resistant to ofloxacin than to co-trimoxazole and that acquisition of resistance to co-trimoxazole was more commonly observed than was acquisition of resistance to ofloxacin. Significantly more patients had skin rashes following co-trimoxazole than ofloxacin treatment (P less than 0.05). Ofloxacin was superior to co-trimoxazole in preventing infection in this population of neutropenic patients.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine in the assessment of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has been recognized as an independent prognostic factor for sepsis mortality in intensive care units. No data are available on kinetics or prognostic value of ADMA in hematological patients. We evaluated the ability of ADMA to act as a predictor for complicated course of febrile neutropenia, defined as bacteremia and/or septic shock in adult hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. This prospective study included 87 adult hematological patients with febrile neutropenia after an intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or after an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Plasma ADMA and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured from the onset of fever (d0) and for 2 days (d1–d2) thereafter. The levels of ADMA were stable or had only minimal changes during the study period. There was no difference between the levels at any time-point in patients having complicated course compared to those without it. On the other hand, CRP levels were significantly higher on d1 (p?=?0.016) in patients with bacteremia and/or septic shock than in those without. ADMA was not able to differentiate hematological patients with a complicated course from those without complications. Elevated ADMA levels are probably associated with organ dysfunction, which is rare in this group of patients, of whom about 95% can be successfully managed at the hematology ward.     

Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a longitudinal comparative study.

As more individuals are being treated for cancer with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR), there is growing interest in treatment side effects and their impact on quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to determine if the severity of fatigue and its impact on quality of life is significantly greater in women undergoing ASCR for breast cancer than in women of similar age with no history of cancer. A group of women being treated with ASCR for breast cancer (n = 31) and a group of women of similar age with no history of cancer (n = 49) participated in this study. Patients completed measures of fatigue and psychosocial functioning prior to treatment, midway through treatment, and toward the end of treatment. Healthy comparison subjects completed the same measures three separate times. Breast cancer patients undergoing ASCR reported significantly more frequent fatigue and more severe fatigue than women with no cancer history. In addition, fatigue had a significantly greater impact on daily functioning and quality of life in patients than in women with no cancer history. Fatigue during ASCR for breast cancer was related to both medical factors (i.e., time since transplant) and psychosocial factors. During ASCR for breast cancer, women experience fatigue which is worse than what is "normally" experienced and which interferes with daily functioning and quality of life. Future research should focus on identifying the biological correlates of fatigue, psychological and physiological mechanisms by which fatigue is produced, and interventions to alleviate fatigue.     

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of neutropenia following outpatient hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) involves the transfer of stem cells to establish hematopoiesis in patients who have received myeloablative chemotherapy with or without whole body irradiation. Following high-dose therapy and HSCT, all patients experience a period of neutropenia. Outpatient care delivery models place expanded responsibilities on patients and their families for the management of this treatment side effect. Proactive management of neutropenia is critical to decrease the depth and duration of neutropenia following HSCT, limit exposure to opportunistic and nosocomial pathogens, and ensure prompt intervention should febrile neutropenia or infection develop. Patient and family education, psychosocial support, and coordination of care are key nursing responsibilities.     

自体造血干细胞移植治疗原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤2例并文献复习

目的探讨自体造血干细胞移植(autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,ASCT)治疗原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(primary central nervous system lymphoma,PCNSL)疗效和预后。方法回顾性分析我中心2例PCNSL临床资料,病理类型均为弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤。经含甲氨蝶呤(methotrexate,MTX)的方案或大剂量MTX(3g/m2)化疗4~5周期,每周期化疗期间给予2次腰椎穿刺+鞘内注射,疾病状态达到完全缓解,后进行大剂量化疗联合自体造血干细胞移植(high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation,HDC/ASCT)巩固治疗。患者1预处理方案为美罗华联合卡氮芥+依托泊苷+阿糖胞苷+注射用美法仑(马法兰)(BEAM),患者2预处理方案为马利兰+噻替哌(TB)。患者1移植后给予腰椎穿刺+鞘注维持治疗,患者2未接受维持治疗。结果患者1移植后无事件生存4年;患者2移植后2年出现疾病复发,再次给予大剂量MTX等治疗,疗效不佳,半年后死亡。结论PCNSL患者经大剂量MTX化疗达到完全缓解后,行自体造血干细胞移植巩固治疗,有机会获得长期无病生存;但PCNSL预后差,最好进行移植后维持治疗。     

Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high-dose ciprofloxacin versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as initial empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever

The aim of the present study was to obtain clinical experience with the use of high-dose ciprofloxacin as monotherapy for the treatment of febrile neutropenia episodes (granulocyte count, <500/mm(3)) compared to a standard regimen and to clarify whether ciprofloxacin administration may be switched to the oral route. In a prospective randomized study ciprofloxacin was given at 400 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) for at least 72 h followed by oral administration at 750 mg twice a day (b.i.d). That regimen was compared with ceftazidime given intravenously at 2 g t.i.d. plus amikacin given intravenously at 500 mg b.i.d. The frequency of successful clinical response without modification at the end of therapy was almost identical for ciprofloxacin (50% [62 of 124 patients]) compared with that for ceftazidime plus amikacin (50.8% [62 of 122 patients]) in an intent-to-treat analysis; the frequencies were 48.3% (57 of 118 patients) versus 49.6% (56 of 113 patients), respectively, in a per-protocol analysis (P values for one-sided equivalence, 0.0485 and 0.0516, respectively; delta = 10%), with no significant differences among patients with bacteremia and other microbiologically or clinically documented infections and fever of unknown origin. For 82 (66.1%) patients, it was possible to switch from parenteral ciprofloxacin to the oral ciprofloxacin, and the response was successful for 61 (74.4%) patients. The efficacies of the regimens against streptococcal bacteremias were 16.6% (one of six patients) for the ciprofloxacin group and 33.3% (one of three patients) for the combination group (it was not statistically significant), with one breakthrough streptococcal bacteremia observed among the ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Adverse events were mostly self-limited and were observed in 27 (20.6%) ciprofloxacin-treated patients and 26 (19.7%) patients who were receiving the combination. This study demonstrates that high-dose ciprofloxacin given intravenously for at least 3 days and then by the oral route is therapeutically equivalent to the routine regimen of intraveneous ceftazidime plus amikacin even in febrile patients with severe neutropenia (polymorphonuclear leukocyte count, <100 mm(3)). However, it is very important that before an empirical therapy is chosen each hospital determine bacteriologic predominance and perform resistance surveillance.     

Turning CD34 Non-Mobilizers into Mobilizers: A Case Report Involving Plerixafor (AMD3100)

SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE: In a significant proportion of patients with hematologic malignancies (5-30%) poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is observed. This compromises the application of effective and potentially curative high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) treatment. CASE REPORT: Here we report the case of a 38-year-old female patient who was treated for recurrent follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma grade III. In this patient, we failed twice to mobilize stem cells using chemotherapy followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Recently a new chemokine receptor CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100 (plerixafor), was introduced which can be combined with G-CSF mobilization and has been reported to increase the number of harvested stem cells significantly. Using this protocol, we were able to harvest a HSC product. This product was transplanted 3 weeks after the harvest (after HDC), and the patient had an uncomplicated recovery of granulopoiesis (day 11 after transplantation of autologous HSC). CONCLUSION: Plerixafor has the potency to become an important tool in mobilizing HSC, especially in those patients in whom HSC cannot be mobilized by the combination of G-CSF and chemotherapy alone.     

Incidence and clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the faecal flora of cancer patients treated with high dose chemotherapy and ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

This study evaluated the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to quinolones in 72 stool samples collected from 31 patients with solid tumours who had undergone high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) rescue with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Samples were obtained at admission, after completing prophylaxis and three months later. All E. coli strains isolated from baseline samples were susceptible to quinolones. Fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains were isolated in 10 (32%) patients in the second sample. In eight of these patients isolates were susceptible 3 months later. No patient developed infection due to fluorquinolone-resistant E. coli. No differences were observed in outcome between patients with susceptible and resistant flora.     

Stem cell transplantation and gene therapy for HIV-related lymphomas

The treatment of patients with HIV-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) is less successful than in the non-HIV setting, in part due to the aggressive character of these lymphomas but also due to the underlying HIV infection. High-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation has been used with success in the HIV-negative lymphoma setting for high-risk or relapsed disease. However, for patients with HIV-NHL and HIV-HD, ultimately the chance for long-term lymphoma-free survival also depends on successful control of the HIV infection. Gene therapy approaches may provide the opportunity for this long-term control. Herein, we describe the use of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in conjunction with current and future gene therapy approaches for the treatment of HIV-associated lymphomas.     

Infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for stem cell collection prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. An additional goal was to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of infectious complications. At the Medical College of Georgia BMT center, 54 patients were administered mobilization chemotherapy for the purpose of collecting stem cells between June, 1997, and May, 2002. All patients received Filgrastim in addition to chemotherapy, and 50 of 54 patients received prophylactic acyclovir, fluconazole, and ciprofloxacin until neutrophil recovery. The median duration to neutrophil recovery was 11 days. Fourteen of 54 (26%) patients developed fever/infections during the mobilization phase. One patient developed both a catheter-related infection and Clostridium difficile colitis, increasing the total number of infectious episodes to 15. Twelve patients had a documented site of infection whereas 2 patients had neutropenic fever with no identifiable source. Eight of the 15 (55%) infections were Gram-positive catheter infections. All the patients were treated successfully with antibiotics. No systemic fungal infections were identified and none of the patients died from complications related to mobilization chemotherapy. Logistic regression was applied for univariate and multivariate analysis and showed that age, sex, diagnosis, neutrophil recovery, disease status, use of salvage chemotherapy, and mobilization regimen used did not affect the infection rate. In our series of 54 patients, 14 patients developed fever/infections during mobilization. Although there is a substantial risk of infectious complications among patients who receive mobilization chemotherapy, it is not clear that prophylactic antibiotics decrease infectious complications. Because the vast majority of infections are Gram-positive catheter infections, it appears reasonable to employ Gram-positive prophylaxis. Controlled studies should be conducted to define the optimum mobilization regimens as well as the optimum combination of prophylactic antibiotics.     

Prospective study of empiric monotherapy with ceftazidime for low-risk grade IV febrile neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy in cancer patients

PURPOSE: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the results of a prospective study in a single medical center using ceftazidime monotherapy in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced grade IV febrile neutropenia and a low risk for gram-negative bacteremia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients were admitted with low-risk grade IV febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy for solid tumors. The median patient age was 57 years (range 18-74). Sixteen patients (42%) developed febrile neutropenia after the first cycle of current chemotherapy line, 9 patients (24%) received 2-3 cycles and 13 patients (34%) received more than 3 chemotherapy cycles before manifesting febrile neutropenia. Five patients were treated with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor commenced 24 h after completion of the chemotherapy cycle. Empiric monotherapy with intravenous ceftazidime was started on admission and administered 2 g every 8 h. RESULTS: The mean polymorphic nuclear cell count on admission was 231 cells/mm(3). Ceftazidime therapy was well tolerated. Twenty-five (66%) patients responded with clinical improvement and complete resolution of fever within 48 h after initiation of ceftazidime therapy. Thirty-two (84%) patients were afebrile after 72 h of therapy. Thirty-three patients (87%) remained on unmodified ceftazidime therapy throughout their hospitalization. Five patients (13%) subsequently required modification of the treatment regimen for various reasons. Mean duration of fever and neutropenia were 2 (1-10) days and 4 (1-11) days, respectively. None of the patients discontinued therapy because of adverse effects. No positive blood cultures were obtained. No events of septic shock were observed. Mean duration of hospitalization was 6 days (range 3-12). CONCLUSION: In our series, monotherapy with intravenous ceftazidime appears safe and effective in cancer patients with low-risk grade IV febrile neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy and may appreciably reduce antibiotics costs.