Is there an association between chronic lung disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion?

Background: Although there is evidence demonstrating an association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), it is not clear whether COPD predicts greater rates of expansion of established aneurysms. We sought such an association in a cohort of men with aneurysms detected in a population‐based study of screening for aneurysms. Methods: In addition to regular aortic ultrasound scans, 179 men with AAA underwent full lung function testing in order to identify the presence of COPD and its subgroups, emphysema and other obstructive ventilatory defects (OVD). The rate of expansion of each aneurysm was calculated and the men were divided into ‘rapid expanders’ (3 mm or more per year) and ‘slow expanders’ (less than 3 mm per year). Any association with the presence of COPD or smoking was tested using a multivariate model. Results: Over a median follow‐up period of 36 months the mean rate of aortic expansion for the cohort of 179 men was 2.1 mm/year. There was no significant difference in prevalence of COPD (68% overall) or having ever been a smoker (87% overall) between the rapid expanders and the slow expanders. Conclusions: Although there was a high prevalence of COPD among men with an AAA, there was no association between the rate of expansion of AAA and the presence of any form of this disease.     

Relation of ventilatory impairment and of chronic mucus hypersecretion to mortality from obstructive lung disease and from all causes.

The relation of ventilatory impairment and chronic mucus hypersecretion to death from all causes and death from obstructive lung disease (chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma) was studied in 13,756 men and women randomly selected from the general population of the City of Copenhagen. During the 10 year follow up 2288 subjects died. In 164 subjects obstructive lung disease was considered to be an underlying or a contributory cause of death (obstructive lung disease related death); in 73 subjects it was considered to be the underlying cause of death (obstructive lung disease death). Forced expiratory volume in one second, expressed as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1% pred), and the presence of chronic phlegm were used to characterise ventilatory function and chronic mucus hypersecretion respectively. For mortality analysis the proportional hazards regression model of Cox was used; it included age, sex, pack years, inhalation habit, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and the presence or absence of asthma, heart disease, and diabetes mellitus as confounding factors. By comparison with subjects with an FEV1 of 80% pred or more, subjects with an FEV1 below 40% pred had increased risk of dying from all causes (relative risk (RR) = 5.0 for women, 2.7 for men), a higher risk of obstructive lung disease related death (RR = 57 for women, 34 for men), and a higher risk of obstructive lung disease death (RR = 101 for women, 77 for men). Chronic mucus hypersecretion was associated with only a slightly higher risk of death from all causes (RR = 1.1 for women, 1.3 for men). The association between chronic mucus hypersecretion and obstructive lung disease death varied with the level of ventilatory function, being weak in subjects with normal ventilatory function (for an FEV1 of 80% pred the RR was 1.2), but more pronounced in subjects with reduced ventilatory function (for an FEV1 of 40% pred the RR was 4.2). A similar though statistically non-significant trend was observed with regard to obstructive lung disease related death. This study shows that impaired lung function is very strongly related to total mortality, obstructive lung disease related mortality, and obstructive lung disease mortality and suggests that chronic mucus hypersecretion, in those with impaired ventilatory function, is also a significant risk factor for death from obstructive lung disease.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in Sweden

A large body of evidence from four international randomised controlled trials (RCT) on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening indicate that ultrasound-based screening in elderly men with a high prevalence (4?%–7?%) reduces AAA-related mortality by 40?% through early AAA detection and increased preventive elective repair and subsequently halves rupture incidence. Coinciding with the planned launch of national AAA screening programs, a dramatic change in AAA epidemiology became evident: a lower AAA prevalence in the targeted population of men and falling mortality rates, most likely related to a drop in rates of smoking, and a paradoxical increase in elective AAA repairs. These changes have called AAA screening in today’s context into question. Sweden was the first country to provide national coverage with an AAA screening program targeting 65-year-old men. The scientifically evaluated screening initiative, started in 2006, reported the lower than expected prevalence (1.7?%) in 65-year-old men early on. Cost-effectiveness seems to be maintained despite the altered epidemiology, as shown in a health-economic study. The current prevalence of AAA among Swedish women is very low, and general population-based screening of women is likely to be futile, although targeted screening among female smokers should be evaluated. Sub-aneurysmal aortas detected at screening are likely to progress to a true AAA within 5 years, indicating a need for continued surveillance in this group. Differences in screening compliance seem to be linked to socio-economic factors. The aim of this topical review is to highlight AAA screening within a Swedish context and point to areas where information is lacking and further research is needed.     

SCREENING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

A study of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was performed. During a 6 month period, 1225 men and women aged 60–80 years were screen at a variety of community venues. Screening was well received by the public and logistically simple to perform. Thirty-three AAA were detected with sizes between 30 and 81 mm. In the 60–80 year age group, the prevalence of (AAA) > 30 mm in diameter was 4.7% in men and 0.35% in women, and the prevalence of AAA > 50mm was 0.6% in men and 0.17% in women. Cigarette smoking, but not hypertension or diabetes, was found to be a significant risk factor for AAA. This study confirms that screening for AAA is feasible and yields high prevalence rates in major population centres.     

Influence of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE: We studied the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a population with high incidences of cardiovascular diseases and analyzed how the prevalence varies according to methodology and criteria. METHODS: All men and women aged 65 to 75 years who lived in the Norsj? municipality in northern Sweden were invited to undergo an ultrasound scanning (US) examination. Those with an aortic diameter of 28 mm or more or with poor visibility on US were examined with computed tomography scanning (CT). Various recommended AAA definitions, two diagnostic methods (US and CT), and two diameters (maximum and anteroposterior) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 555 people invited to participate in the study, 504 accepted (248 men and 256 women; 91%). Eight subjects had undergone surgery for an AAA. Ninety-two subjects underwent CT. The mean maximum infrarenal aortic diameter was 24.6 mm (by means of US). Depending on diagnostic criteria, the AAA prevalence was 3.6% to 16.9% in men and 0.8% to 9.4% in women. Depending on which previous study was used as a comparison and the definition of AAA and diagnostic technique used, the prevalence in this study was 1.3 to 4.0 times higher for men and 2.0 to 5.8 times higher for women. CONCLUSION: In a region in which residents have a high risk for cardiovascular disease, we found the highest prevalence of AAA ever reported within a population. The prevalence highly depends on methodology and diagnostic criteria, with a 10-fold variation. Detailed defined criteria are necessary to permit comparisons between studies: the number of individuals who have undergone surgery for AAA and whether they are included, the prevalence in 5- and 10-year age intervals, attendance rate, visibility, which diameter(s) is measured, and the prevalences with as many as possible of the four described definitions of AAA. The etiology of the high prevalence of AAA in this population needs to be investigated further.     

Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to develop a simulation model to assess the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for different screening strategies in terms of age (60, 65, or 70 years) and risk profiles (all men or specific high-risk groups) of the screened population, and rescreening after 5 or 10 years. These data were analyzed in a Markov simulation cohort model. RESULTS: The cost per life year gained for different screening strategies ranged from US 8,309 dollars to US 14,084 dollars and was estimated at US 10,474 dollars when 65-year-old men were screened once. Screening 60-year-old men was equally cost-effective, with the advantage of more life years gained. We demonstrated a trade-off between high prevalence of AAA and lower life expectancy, eliminating the expected benefits of screening high-risk groups such as smokers (US 10,695 dollars) or cardiovascular patients (US 10,392 dollars). Assuming general population utility resulted in a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of US 13,900 dollars, whereas a hypothetical 5% reduction in utility among men with a screening-detected AAA raised the cost per QALY gained to US 75,100 dollars. CONCLUSION: This Markov model, which was based on a systematic review of the literature, supplied information on the estimated cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies. Screening men for AAA may be cost-effective in the long-term. Different screening strategies and quality-of-life effects related to screening for AAA need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.     

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in cardiovascular patients

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) in a population of symptomatic cardiac patients. A retrospective cohort study of investigations was done at the cardiology clinic, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 415 men and women recruited by referral to the cardiology clinic. All participants underwent routine ultrasound screening for AAA, and full assessment of all cardiac risk factors. Data were analyzed and correlated with age, sex, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of aneurysm was based on an anteroposterior diameter of 3 cm or more. Of the 415 patients screened, 47 aneurysms were detected. Total incidence of AAA was 9.9% (male 14.1%, female 3.95%). All aneurysms were detected in patients over 60 years, detection rate 11.7% (male 16.3%, female 3.9%). The incidence of AAA was significantly higher in those who were subsequently proven to have cardiovascular disease, 13.8% (male 18%, female 5.15%). CONCLUSION: Screening the general population for those at risk of AAA is an ongoing debate. This study supports the concept of screening a higher risk population of patients over 60 years with cardiovascular disease.     

Different disease profiles for women and men with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The overall aim with this study was to investigate causes of death and mortality rates for women and men treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Sweden. MATERIALS AND METHOD: All patients treated for ruptured and non-ruptured AAA 1987-2002 in Sweden were identified in national registries (n=12917). Age, sex, diagnosis, surgical procedure and mortality were analysed on a patient specific level. Logistic regression and analysis of standardised mortality rates (SMR) were performed. RESULTS: Post operative mortality was similar between the sexes. Age (p<0.0001), and surgery for rupture (p=0.0005), but not gender (p=0.65) were significant risk factor for poor long term survival. SMR revealed increased risk for both sexes compared to the population with significantly higher values for women than men (2.26, CI 2.10-2.43 vs. 1.63, CI 1.57-1.68, p<0.0001). The higher risk for women could be explained by the higher risk for aneurysm related death (ie.thoracic or abdominal aorta) compared to men (Hazard ratio 1.57 vs. 1.0, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Women do not have an increased surgical risk compared to men, but treated women have an increased risk of premature death compared to men and women in the population. They also have a higher risk for aneurysm related death compared to men with AAA.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Poland

Background

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is currently recommended by several vascular societies. In countries where it has been introduced the prevalence of AAAs differed greatly and was mainly related to cigarette smoking. The screening program also had an enormous impact on the decrease of AAA ruptures and reduced mortality rate. These facts have led to the introduction of the first screening program for AAAs in Poland.

Objective

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of AAAs among men aged 60 years and older undergoing ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta.

Material and methods

A single ultrasonography of the abdomen was performed to assess the aorta from the renal arteries to the bifurcation and the diameter of the aorta was measured at its widest point. The cut-off value for determining an aortic aneurysm was set at a diameter of ≥?30 mm. All ultrasonography measurements were performed by physicians in outpatient departments throughout the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province. Additionally, each subject had to fill out a questionnaire with demographic data, smoking habits, existing comorbidities and familial occurrence of AAAs. The study was conducted from October 2009 to November 2011.

Results

The abdominal aorta ultrasound examinations were carried out in 1556 men aged 60 years and older. The prevalence of AAA in the study population was 6.0?% (94 out of 1556). The average age of the men was 69 years (SD 6 years, range 60–92 years). In the study population 55?% of the men smoked or had smoked and 3?% were aware of the presence of AAAs in family members. There were three risk factors significantly associated with the presence of AAAs: age (p?Conclusion The prevalence of AAAs among men in Poland is higher than in other European countries and the USA. The screening program for AAAs is an easy and reliable method for detecting early stages of the disease and risk factors which are the driving forces for the development of AAAs.     

The Long-term Benefits of a Single Scan for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) at Age 65

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of a single ultrasonic scan at age 65 to identify patients at risk from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHOD: A total of 6058 men aged 64-81 were recruited to a randomised trial, and 3000 were invited to attend a single screening test. An additional population of 1011 men was offered screening as they reached age 65. If a normal aorta was identified in this sub-group, further scans were offered at two-yearly intervals. Follow up and treatment of those identified as having an aortic dilatation of 3 cm or greater was undertaken. All subject groups were monitored for deaths occurring over the study period, and date and cause of death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2212 men attended screening in the randomised trial; the overall compliance was 74%, and prevalence of AAA was 7.7%. Compliance decreased, and prevalence increased, with age. Mortality from ruptured AAA was reduced by 68% at 5 years (screened group compared to the age-matched control population), and by 42% in the study arm (screened and refusers) compared with controls. The benefit persisted at ten years (53% and 21% respectively). Of the uncontrolled sample of 1011 men offered a scan at age 65, 681 attended and 649 of these were found to have a normal aortic diameter; re-screening demonstrated new aneurysm development in 4% over ten years. The aortic diameters of the new AAAs were under 4 cm and would therefore have a low risk of rupture.1 Mortality from rupture in all those with an initially normal aortic diameter was low, at 1 case per 1000 scans over ten years. CONCLUSION: Screening once for AAA at age 65 can identify the majority of AAA that are of clinical significance and can identify a large population at low risk from rupture who do not require surveillance. This policy has been effective when combined with selective treatment in reducing the risk of rupture for ten years in those who attend the screening programme.     

Late survival after elective repair of aortic aneurysms detected by screening.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether there was any survival advantage in men following elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detected by ultrasound screening compared to those with an AAA detected incidentally. METHODS: A total of 424 men underwent elective AAA repair between 1990 and 1998; 181 were detected in an aneurysm screening programme and 243 were diagnosed incidentally. Follow-up survival data were collected until 2003 (minimum 5 years) and survival curves were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: The postoperative 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in men whose aneurysms were detected by screening (4.4%), compared with those detected incidentally (9.0%). Similarly, 5-year survival (78% vs. 65%) and 10-year survival rates (63% vs. 40%) were better after repair of a screen-detected AAA (p<0.0003 at all time intervals, by log rank testing). Multivariate analysis showed that this was largely due to the older age of men who had repair of an incidental AAA (71.2 vs. 67.1 years). CONCLUSION: Men who had elective repair of an AAA detected by screening had a better late survival rate than men whose aneurysm was discovered incidentally because they were younger at the time of surgery.     

Indicators of infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae are associated with expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE: Chlamydia Pneumoniae has been shown to be associated with atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The possible association between AAA expansion and C pneumoniae infection was therefore assessed. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from patients with an AAA that was considered for surgical repair after having been diagnosed by means of the Chichester aneurysm screening program (UK) as having an initially infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 to 5.9 cm. The patients were examined prospectively for as long as 11.5 years (mean, 4.1 years) with ultrasound scanning. Of 110 patients considered for surgery, 90 men and 10 women had blood samples taken. Their IgG and IgA antibodies against C pneumoniae were measured by means of a microimmunofluorescence test. Unpaired t tests, multiple linear regression analyses, and logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 44% (95% CI, 31%-55%) of the men with an AAA had an IgA titer of 64 or more, an IgG titer of 128 or more, or both, compared with 10% of the women with an AAA (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 1.05-160.8). A titer of IgG of 128 or more was significantly associated with higher expansion (5.3 vs 2.6 mm per year), even after adjustment for initial AAA size and age. A significant positive correlation between both IgA and IgG titers and mean annual expansion was observed (r = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.05-0.49; and r = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.62, respectively), persisting after adjusting for initial AAA size and age. An IgG titer of 128 or more was present significantly more often in cases with an expansion greater than 1 cm annually (adjusted OR = 12.6; 95% CI, 1.37-293). CONCLUSION: A high proportion of men with an AAA has signs of infection with C pneumoniae. The progression of their AAAs was positively correlated with the presence of indicators of C pneumoniae infection.     

Concomitant Detection of Systemic Atherosclerotic Disease while Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Introduction Although population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has/had a significant impact on disease-specific mortality, coexisting systemic atherosclerosis represents the major impediment to improved longevity. We examined the feasibility and yield of full cardiovascular assessment concomitant with screening for AAA detection. Methods A total of 1032 asymptomatic men over the age of 50 years (328 were >60 years) underwent a detailed cardiac health questionnaire, sphygmomanometry, body mass index calculation, fasting lipid profiling, ultrasonographic (US) examination of their infrarenal aorta and carotid arteries, and treadmill exercise stress testing. Framingham and SCORE project estimations of the 10-year risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) of any cause were calculated for the men with an AAA and in those >60 years but with neither AAA nor known cardiac disease. Results Overall, we detected an AAA >3 cm in 30 men (2.9%). Unaddressed obesity, smoking, hypertension, impaired glucose metabolism, and hypercholesterolemia were commonly identified in individuals both with and without an AAA, being notably frequent in those >60 years without an AAA. The 10-year risk of IHD and CHD in those >60 years was similar regardless of whether an AAA was present. Doppler screening for significant carotid stenosis had detection rates similar to those for aortic US scanning, being most useful in those >65 years of age. Exercise stress testing, however, was of only limited value when used nonselectively. Conclusions Modifiable atherosclerotic disease and cardiovascular risk can be readily detected in individuals presenting for AAA screening and are present to a significant degree at an earlier age. Consideration of selected, additional investigations is required to maximize the value of generalized screening programs.     

Association of silicosis, lung dysfunction, and emphysema in gold miners.

BACKGROUND--In an earlier study of gold miners men with silicosis were found to have abnormal lung function, including airflow obstruction and reduced diffusing capacity. In a follow up study a sample of these men was examined by computed tomography to determine whether emphysema accounted for these abnormalities, which are associated with silicosis in this working population. METHODS--A sample of 70 men from a cohort of older gold miners with and without silicosis who had worked underground for a mean period of 29 years was examined by computed tomography to determine whether each man had emphysema. In addition, each man had lung function tests and routine chest radiography (125 kV). RESULTS--A total of 48 men had emphysema on examination by computed tomography. On the basis of the results in a chest radiograph 55 of the men had silicosis. Emphysema was related to silicosis, being present in five of the 15 men without silicosis and in 43 of the 55 with silicosis. Diffuse emphysema was apparent in two men without silicosis (14%) and in 25 men with silicosis (45%). The proportion of men with diffuse emphysema increased from 14% in those with International Labour Organisation category 0 nodule profusion to 46% in those with category 1, 48% in those with category 2, and 67% in those with category 3. Emphysema was also related to smoking: eight of the 18 who had never smoked and 40 of the 52 smokers had emphysema. All of those who had never smoked and had emphysema had silicosis with category 2/2 or greater nodule profusion. Lung function tests showed changes associated with silicosis that could be explained by the associated emphysema. CONCLUSIONS--In this population emphysema occurred in association with silicosis and accounted for the abnormalities in lung function associated with silicosis.     

Selective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms smaller than 5.0 cm in a prospective sizing program with gender-specific analysis

PURPOSE: We present extended follow-up findings of the Kingston prospective sizing program for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) smaller than 5.0 cm in diameter, with gender-specific analysis. METHODS: From 1976 to 2001, 895 patients (688 men, 207 women) with AAA smaller than 5.0 cm were entered, regardless of fitness, in a prospective sizing program in which computed tomography scans were obtained every 6 months. Operations were performed in fit patients with an increase in AAA size to 5 cm (n = 190), AAA expansion greater than 0.5 cm in 6 months (n = 27), or for other reasons (n = 33). Follow-up continued until AAA rupture, surgery, death, or removal from the program. RESULTS: No AAA smaller than 5.0 cm ruptured during prospective follow-up. There was a statistically significant increase in expansion rate relative to size at entry, with the highest mean expansion rate of 0.52 cm/y for AAA 4.5 to 4.9 cm in diameter. There was no significant difference in AAA expansion rate between men and women. The frequency of surgery was inversely related to age at entry, but was positively related to AAA size at entry, with patients with AAA 4.5 to 4.9 cm at entry 6.8 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 4.3-10.7) to undergo surgery than those with AAA 3.0 to 3.4 cm at entry. Women were older than men at entry, and age at entry in those undergoing surgery was significantly greater in women. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the results of the United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial and the Aneurysm Detection and Management Study, that is, that risk for rupture is extremely unlikely with AAA smaller than 5.0 cm, which enables safe follow-up surveillance programs in both men and women with AAA smaller than 5.0 cm.     

High-risk and low-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm both reduce aneurysm-related mortality. A stratified analysis from a single-centre randomised screening trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are both associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was therefore to analyse whether screening for AAA could be restricted to men with such diseases (high risk group). METHODS: Before the date of randomisation of a population screening trial of 12,639 64-73-year-old males, all discharge diagnoses from the National Patient Registry concerning AAA-related diseases were merged with the screening results on attendance, AAA prevalence, and AAA-related mortality and overall mortality. Differences in proportions were compared by Chi square tests and differences in mortality by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 78.8% and 6.7% had an AAA in the high risk group compared to 75.8% attendance (P<0.001) and 2.9% (P<0.001) in the remaining population. Cumulatively, screening of only high risk men with would have required 72.9% (95% C.I.: 72.3-74.5%) fewer screening invitations, would have discovered 46.1% (95% C.I.: 38.9-53.4%) of the AAA cases diagnosed and prevented 46.7% (95% C.I.: 28.3-65.7%) of the AAA-related deaths. However, screening decreased AAA-related mortality both among men with and without known COPD or cardiovascular diseases: mortality ratio: 0.22 (95% C.I.: 0.08-0.65), P=0.006, and 0.24 (95% C.I: 0.09-0.63, P=0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: High-risk population screening would prevent less than half of AAA-related deaths. Therefore, restricting screening to such high-risk groups does not seem justified, but cost effectiveness analyses are needed to reach a firm conclusion.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in over 65-year-old men with inguinal hernias

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in over 65-year-old men who have inguinal hernias and discuss if pre-operative selective screening of this population is appropriate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study on 70 consecutive male patients with an age range of 65–88 years (mean, 74 years) who were referred to a single vascular consultant''s out-patient clinic with an inguinal hernia were screened for the presence of an AAA with an ultrasound scan before hernia repair over a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two patients were found to have an AAA measuring 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm giving an AAA prevalence of 3% (exact 95% confidence interval = 0–10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not demonstrate an increased AAA prevalence in over 65-year-old male patients with inguinal hernias, scanned pre-operatively when compared to screening programmes. Selective screening of this cohort cannot be justified on this evidence.     

Aortic diameter at age 65 in men with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30?mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p?=?0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p?=?.010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, presence of atherosclerotic disease and hypertension into account, the difference in AAA prevalence was no longer significant (p?=?.15). Among men in group A, C-peptide (r?=?.093; p?=?.034), but not HbA1c (r?=?.060; p?=?.24) correlated with aortic diameter. Conclusion. Among 65 year old men aortic diameter and AAA prevalence do not differ between those with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. Putative protective effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus against aortic dilatation and AAA development therefore probably occur later after diagnosis of diabetes.     

Endovascular aneurysm repair with a bifurcated endovascular graft at a primary referral center: influence of experience, age, gender, and aneurysm size on suitability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) in an unselected patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1999 and May 2002 all consecutive patients with a nonemergent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were prospectively examined with contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT). Those patients probably suitable for EVAR on the basis of CT findings underwent calibrated angiography. A panel of radiologists and vascular surgeons reviewed the clinical data and vascular anatomy, and decided on the appropriateness of EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients were included. Fifty-six patients (52%) had one or more contraindications for EVAR. Unsuitability was most frequently (88%) related to the proximal neck. Inadequate neck length was the most common specific reason. Inadequate iliac anatomy was the reason for unsuitability in 59% of patients. The rate of unsuitability decreased from 61% during the first half of the study to 40% during the second half (P =.03) Unsuitability was equal between men and women. Age and maximum diameter did not differ between candidates and noncandidates. CONCLUSION: Almost half (48%) of patients with an infrarenal AAA referred to a primary referral center are suitable for EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft. Neck anatomy was the most frequent reason for rejection. Rate of suitability increased over time, probably as a result of increasing experience. Suitability was not influenced by gender, age, or aneurysm size.