雷帕霉素洗脱支架对糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的远期影响

目的分析雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)对糖尿病患经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的远期影响。方法采用回顾性研究方法,在1004．例接受冠状动脉内支架术治疗的冠心病患中,84例糖尿病和250例非糖尿病患置入SES;168例糖尿病和502例非糖尿病患置入普通支架。记录并比较一般临床资料、冠状动脉造影及冠状动脉内支架术情况、远期心脏事件发生率和1年无心脏事件生存率。结果随访期间(平均16．2个月),SES组中糖尿病亚组和非糖尿病亚组的远期心脏事件发生率为4．8％比3．6％,P=0．744;1年无心脏事件生存率为95．0％比96．7％,P=0．602,两亚组差异均无统计学意义。但BMS组中,糖尿病亚组的远期心脏事件发生率显高于非糖尿病组(31.0%比21．7％,P=0．015);两亚组的1年无心脏事件生存率分别为74．2％比86．8％(P=0．001)。结论SES能显改善糖尿病患冠状动脉支架术的远期疗效,降低靶病变再狭窄和远期心脏事件的发生率,提高1年无心脏事件生存率。     

冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者置入药物洗脱支架的疗效评价

目的 评价冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉病变置入药物洗脱支架后的疗效。方法 选择我院2004年4月至2005年8月连续接受置入药物洗脱支架（DES）或金属裸支架（BMS）治疗并且进行了冠状动脉造影随访的139例的冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者。所有患者在支架术后6个月后接受冠状动脉造影随访。结果共139例患者（男性114例,女性25例）221处病变完成随访。其中C型病变94处（42．5％）,完全闭塞病变42处（19．0％）,平均每个病变支架长度（26．53±14．72）mm,平均参考血管直径（2．80±0．43）mm。两组患者在性别比例和年龄方面差异无统计学意义。两组在冠心病的危险因素如：高血压病、高脂血症、吸烟等方面差异无统计学意义。两组病变的复杂程度基本相当。DES组的参考血管直径比BMS组小[（2．71±0．41）mm比（2．98±0．53）mm,P〈0．001]。6个月后随访,DES组的支架内再狭窄率（10．6％比38．6％,P〈0．001）和病变内晚期腔径丢失[（0．24±0．56）mm比（0．91±0．77）mm,P〈0．001]明显低于BMS组。DES组的靶病变血管重建率显著低于BMS组（8．6％比30．0％,P〈0．001）。DES组有4例晚期支架内血栓。结论 本研究显示药物洗脱支架对于冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉病变的介入治疗有着良好的治疗效果,明显优于金属裸支架。     

Impact of the metabolic syndrome on angiographic and clinical events after coronary intervention using bare-metal or sirolimus-eluting stents

Patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Although the number of patients with MS requiring coronary revascularization is increasing rapidly, the impact of MS on clinical events and restenosis in patients who undergo stent placement is not well defined. Seven hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with 734 de novo coronary lesions (<50 mm lesion length, reference vessel diameter <3.5 mm) were enrolled in this study. Four hundred thirty-seven patients were treated with bare-metal stents, and 297 patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Patients with bifurcation lesions, left main lesions, and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions were excluded from the study. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: those with (1) diabetes mellitus (DM), (2) MS without DM, and (3) no MS and no DM. MS was defined according to American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria (the presence of > or =3 of the following criteria: obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased fasting glucose). Clinical follow-up was performed for > or =1 year (mean 27.5 +/- 18.1 months). One hundred sixty-four patients (22%) had DM, 180 patients (25%) had MS without DM, and 390 patients (53%) had no MS and no DM. Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were comparable among the 3 groups, including lesion length and reference vessel diameter. In patients treated with bare-metal stents, the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12 months were 14% in patients without DM or MS, 18% in those with MS but no DM, and 33% in those with DM (p = 0.046). In patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents, the MACE rates were 3% in patients without DM or MS, 4% in those with MS, and 13% in those with DM (p = 0.034). DM (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 3.07, p <0.001) and bare-metal stent (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 4.22, p <0.001) implantation were independent predictors of MACEs during follow-up, whereas MS was not predictive. Similarly, MS was not a predictor of target lesion revascularization. In conclusion, patients with MS did not have an increased risk for target lesion revascularization or a greater MACE rate compared with control patients during a 12 month follow-up period after bare-metal or drug-eluting stent placement. In contrast, DM is associated with significantly increased event rates.     

Efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in coronary artery disease patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis

Objective

To compare by meta-analysis the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting and bare-metal stents in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with diabetes.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1971 to 2012. Data on the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting and bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes were collected. A meta-analysis was then performed on a total of 1 259 CAD patients with diabetes from six studies. The odds ratio (OR) was used for comparison. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the sample size, year of study, subjects’ geographic area and study method.

Results

Compared with those in the bare-metal stent group (BMS), the subjects in the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) group had a reduced risk for major cardiac events [OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 024–0.74, p < 0.01] and target-lesion revascularisation (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11–0.59, p < 0.01). There was no difference for myocardial infarction (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.61–1.40, p > 0.05) or mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.74–1.92, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference for overall risk of major cardiac events between SES and BMS when the sample size was ≤ 90 (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16–0.48, p < 0.01), when it was a randomised control trial (RCT) (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19–0.42, p < 0.01), or when it was performed on European subjects (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27–0.77, p < 0.01). The sensitivity was not different when one study was removed at a time.

Conclusion

Our study confirmed that SES are safer and more effective than BMS in CAD patients with diabetes, as far as major cardiac events are concerned.     

Long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with drug-eluting compared to bare-metal stents for the treatment of transplant coronary artery disease

Objective : We aimed to compare the long‐term clinical outcomes of first‐vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug‐eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents (BMS) for the treatment of transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD). Background : TCAD is the leading cause of late death in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) recipients. PCI is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with non‐OHT patients. Our institution previously reported superior angiographic outcomes with DES compared with BMS in OHT patients. However, long‐term clinical outcomes comparing PCI with DES versus BMS are lacking. Methods : The data on 105 OHT recipients who underwent first‐vessel PCI with DES (n = 58) or BMS (n = 47) at UCLA Medical Center between 1995 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Results : Five‐year clinical outcomes were not significantly different with DES and BMS in terms of the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR) [(40.8 ± 7.2)% vs. (59.6 ± 7.2)%, log‐rank P = 0.33], death [(31.8 ± 7.8)% vs. (40.4 ± 7.2)%, log‐rank P = 0.46], MI [(12.2 ± 6.2)% vs. (11.3 ± 5.4)%, log rank P = 0.98], TVR [(25.5 ± 6.9)% vs. (26.5 ± 7.3)%, log rank P = 0.76], and time to repeat OHT [(2.27 ± 1.79) vs. (3.22 ± 3.34), P = 0.98]. Conclusions : At long‐term follow‐up, PCI with DES and BMS provided similar clinical outcomes in OHT. Long‐term mortality remains high in OHT recipients after PCI with either DES or BMS. Randomized clinical trials are required to determine the optimal treatment strategy for OHT recipients with TCAD. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Stenting the stent: initial results and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis

Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge affecting an increasing number of patients. Conventional angioplasty and debulking techniques are currently used in these patients. However, the potential role of a second stent implantation in this setting (stenting the stent) remains unknown. Therefore, 65 consecutive patients (12 women, aged 62 +/- 11 years) undergoing stent implantation (42 elective and 23 unplanned) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (diffuse [> 10 mm] in 39 [60%]) were studied. Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. Three patients developed hospital complications: 1 died from refractory heart failure and 2 suffered non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. During follow-up (mean 17 +/- 11 months) 1 patient died (noncardiac cause) and only 9 (14%) required target vessel revascularization. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was 84%. Using Cox analysis, patients with unstable symptoms, a short time to stent restenosis, nonelective stenting, and B2-C lesions tended to have poorer prognosis. After adjustment, nonelective stenting was associated (adjusted RR 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 10.3, p = 0.09) with an adverse clinical outcome. On quantitative angiography (core lab) restenosis was found in 13 of 43 patients (30%) (75% of those eligible). Logistic regression analysis identify restenosis length (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14, p = 0.04), and time to restenosis (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94, p = 0.01) as the only independent predictors of recurrent restenosis. Thus, repeat coronary stenting is a safe and efficacious strategy for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis. Both elective and nonelective stenting provide excellent initial results. The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of these patients is also favorable.     

Comparison of long-term outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stents in triple-vessel coronary artery disease

After the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs), percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs has challenged coronary artery bypass grafting as the gold standard for the treatment of 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical results between percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Two hundred ninety propensity-score matched patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease treated by DESs or OPCAB were included. Mean follow-up duration was 58.8 ± 11.5 months (2 to 73) and follow-up rate was 97.9%. Five-year survival rates were 94.8 ± 2.1% in the DES group and 96.5 ± 1.5% in the OPCAB group (p = 0.658). Five-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event were 71.6 ± 4.1% in the DES group and 89.6 ± 2.5% in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). Freedom from nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization rates were the determining factors between the 2 groups (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). The OPCAB group showed better clinical outcomes compared to the DES group in 3-vessel coronary artery disease after 5-year follow-up. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rate was significantly higher in the OPCAB group mainly because of the lower incidence of target vessel revascularization and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Longer follow-up with randomization will clarify our present conclusions.     

Interleukin-8 as an independent predictor of long-term clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease

Left ventricular torsion is a measurement derived from the twisting or wringing motion of the heart around its long axis. The calculation is made by measuring the magnitude of rotation at the apex of the heart, and subtracting the rotation at the base. Although the phenomenon of left ventricular twisting was first described in the 17th Century, it wasn't until the 1960s that the first invasive method of measurement was demonstrated. Silver tantalum clips were sutured into the epicardium during cardiac surgery and viewed using cineradiography. Non-invasive torsion measurement has been subsequently developed, adopting Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 2D echocardiography. Interest in the changes of different components of torsion, during various cardiac disease states has developed with the advent of these non-invasive measurement techniques. This review article summarises the history of the development of torsion analysis and describes the known changes of torsion during different clinical circumstances.     

青年人冠心病临床、冠状动脉造影特点及介入治疗

目的 探讨青年冠心病的临床冠状动脉造影特点及介入治疗的效果。方法 对52例年龄≤40岁临床诊断冠心病的患者行冠状动脉造影检查,分析其临床及冠状动脉造影特点。28例患者进行了经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)。结果 冠心病的危险因素中吸烟占85.7％,高胆固醇血症占46.2％,冠心病家族史占38.5％;发病前有明显诱因者占55.8％;冠状动脉造影未见明显异常者占7.7％,单支、双支、三支病变者分别为57.7％,21.2％,13.5％;行介入治疗的28例患者共扩张血管37支,病变45处,置入支架41枚;病例成功率96.4％,病变成功率93.4％。结论 青年人冠心病主要危险因素为男性、吸烟、高胆固醇血症、冠心病家族史.单支血管病变为主,发病前多有明显诱因,PTCA是一种安全有效的介入性治疗技术。     

Stenting of long coronary artery lesions: initial angiographic results and 6-month clinical outcome of the micro stent II-XL.

To evaluate the results of long Micro Stent II (MS-XL) implantations, 119 MS-XLs were implanted in 102 patients (age, 62.83 years). Nineteen stents (16%) were implanted in saphenous vein grafts; 100 stents (84%) were implanted in native coronary arteries. Twenty-five patients (25%) were treated because of acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 30 patients (29%) because of unstable angina or angina class IV, and 47 patients (46%) because of stable angina. Eighty-six de novo lesions (84%) and 16 restenotic lesions (16%) were treated. Indications for stent implantation include elective, 61 patients (60%); suboptimal balloon angioplasty result, 22 patients (21%); and bailout after balloon angioplasty, 19 patients (19%). Because of residual thrombus after stenting, 27 patients (26%) received abciximab. All patients received ticlopidin for 28 days and acetylsalicylic acid. One hundred and seventeen MS-XLs (98%) were implanted successfully. Additional (shorter) MS-II were implanted in 40 patients (39%). The stented segment length was 45 +/- 20 mm. The minimum lumen diameter increased from 0.5 +/- 0.5 mm before to 2.7 +/- 0.5 mm after stent implantation. The acute gain was 2.2 +/- 0.4 mm. Early clinical events (<4 weeks) include death, 3 (3%); subacute stent thrombosis, 1 (1%); non-Q-wave infarction, 2 (2%); CABG, 1 (1%); vascular complications, 2 (2%). Late clinical events (<6 months) include acute myocardial infarction, 5 (5%); reintervention, 6 (6%); CABG, 1 (1%). The procedural success rate was 88%, and the event free survival at 6 months was 76%. Stenting of long lesions with the MS-XL was successful and associated with an acceptable complication rate. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:105-112, 1999.