Registry data evaluating the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of symptomatic in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND: In this new-era of drug-eluting stents (DES) the impact of symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) is diminishing. However, world wide bare-metal stents remain widely used and therefore, it is imperative to establish a simple and effective form of treatment. The objective of this registry database was to evaluate the 'real-world' effectiveness of DES for the treatment of symptomatic bare-metal stent ISR. METHODS: All patients presenting with symptomatic ISR were evaluated between February 2003 and February 2005. Patients had 9-month angiographic follow-up with primary endpoint evaluation of binary restenosis (>50%). Secondary endpoints included in-segment late loss, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and the difference in late loss between sirolimus (n=23) and paciltaxel (n=36) eluting stents. RESULTS: Fifty eight patients with fifty nine ISR lesions were evaluated, 36% of patients had diabetes mellitus. All procedures were performed safely with no adverse peri-procedural events documented. At 9-month follow-up the median in-segment late loss was 0.24 mm (IQR 0.1, 0.53), with a binary restenosis rate of 17%. At long-term follow-up greater than 1 year, the incidence of TLR was 10%. No difference in the angiographic parameter of in-segment late loss was seen between the sirolimus and paclitaxel-eluting stents. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up, DES is an effective and safe treatment for symptomatic bare-metal stent ISR.     

Retrospective comparison of clinical and angiographic outcomes after sirolimus-eluting and bare-metal stent implantation in 312 consecutive, nonrandomized severely calcified lesions using a rotablator

In order to compare the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and bare-metal stent (BMS) placement in severely calcified lesions using a rotablator under the widespread indication of SES, a nonrandomized examination of 312 consecutive lesions after successful implantation of a BMS (99 lesions in 84 patients; from January 2003) or SES (213 in 167; from September 2004) using a rotablator was conducted. The lesion-based primary endpoints (cardiac death and nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction) and the secondary endpoint [binary restenosis (BR) (diameter stenosis > 50%) at follow-up angiography] were retrospectively determined in August 2010. The incidence of primary endpoint in the SES group (2.3%; mean follow-up period of 1289 ± 526 days) was significantly lower than that in the BMS group (7.1%; P = 0.043; 1803 ± 887 days), although the several variables related to the endpoints were present in the SES group. Cox proportional hazard model analysis revealed that SES was not significantly related to a primary endpoint [hazard ratio of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.073-2.42; P = 0.33)]. The incidence of BR in the SES group (21.3%) was not significantly different from that in the BMS group (27.1%) (P = 0.33). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SES was not a significant predictor of BR [Odds ratio of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.41-1.51; P = 0.47)]. Thus, although the results of the present retrospective nonrandomized study demonstrate the long-term safety of SES for calcified lesions using a rotablator in daily practice, SES did not show a benefit for the angiographic outcomes compared to BMS.     

Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study

Background

Direct stenting (DS) has been shown to be associated with reduced radiation exposure and procedural costs but has a restenosis rate and clinical outcomes similar to conventional stenting (CS) with balloon predilatation. Whether DS confers benefit in diabetic patients, who have been shown to have high restenosis risk after stent implantation, remains unknown.

Methods

In a multicenter randomized trial, diabetic patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation for a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery between April 2001 and October 2002 were randomized into DS or CS treatment groups. All patients received NirElite stents (SciMed, Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, Minn). They were scheduled to undergo a 6-month angiographic follow-up with quantitative coronary analysis evaluation. The primary end point was a 6-month binary restenosis rate and the secondary end point involved 6-month all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization rates.

Results

A total of 128 diabetic patients were randomized into DS or CS treatment groups (n = 64, both groups). The 2 groups were well matched in baseline and lesion characteristics. The procedural success rate was similar (DC vs CS; 98.4% vs 96.9%). Nineteen patients (29.7%) crossed over from DS to CS. Six-month angiographic follow-up showed similar restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameter and late lumen loss. The binary restenosis rate was 43% in DS and 52% in CS groups (P = NS). The 6-month all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization rates were also similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Among diabetic patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation, DS is safe and feasible. However, it is not associated with reduction in restenosis rate or improvement in clinical outcomes when compared with CS.     

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the Italian Multicenter Randomized DESSERT Study)

Few studies directly compared drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in diabetic patients. DESSERT was an Italian multicenter randomized trial to show the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) compared with BMSs in de novo lesions of diabetic patients treated with insulin and/or oral antidiabetics for > or =3 months on top of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss, assessed using centralized quantitative coronary angiography at 8-month follow-up. Centrally adjudicated composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and target-vessel failure (TVF; death, treated vessel-related acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 30 days and 9 and 12 months were secondary end points. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to an SES (109 lesions), and 75 (109 lesions), to a BMS. The 2 groups were well balanced for clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics. In-stent late lumen loss decreased from 0.96 +/- 0.61 mm for BMSs to 0.14 +/- 0.33 for SESs (p <0.001), and in-segment binary restenosis was 38.8% versus 3.6%, respectively (p <0.001). Twelve-month clinical events were significantly lower in the sirolimus group: MACEs 22.1% versus 40% (p = 0.023), target-lesion revascularization 5.9% versus 30% (p <0.001), and TVF 14.7% versus 34.3% (p = 0.008). At multivariate analysis, stent type was confirmed as an independent predictor of in-segment late loss (p <0.001), binary restenosis (p <0.001), 12-month TVF (p = 0.010), and 12-month MACEs (p = 0.037). In conclusion, the randomized DESSERT showed SESs to be safe and effective in decreasing both angiographic parameters of restenosis and incidence of MACEs compared with BMSs in diabetic patients with de novo 1- or 2-vessel coronary stenoses.     

Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

AIM: Drug-eluting stents have considerably reduced restenosis. Their relative merits have been assessed on the basis of comparisons made with control bare stents with thick struts. However, increased strut thickness negatively affects restenosis. No direct comparisons between drug-eluting stents and bare stents with thin struts have been performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher) as compared with that of bare stents with thin struts (BeStent 2). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 500 patients with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to receive a Cypher stent or BeStent. The primary endpoint was angiographic restenosis defined as a stenosis diameter > or = 50% at 6-month angiographic follow-up. The secondary endpoint was the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) during the year following the procedure. Follow-up angiography was performed in 81.8% of the patients. Patients treated with Cypher stents had a lower angiographic restenosis rate [8.3 vs. 25.5%, relative risk, 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.56), P<0.001] and a lower incidence of TVR [7.2 vs. 18.8%, relative risk, 0.38 (0.22-0.66), P<0.001]. For smaller vessels (< 2.8 mm), the angiographic restenosis rates were 7.0% with the Cypher stent and 34.2% with the BeStent (P<0.001). For larger vessels (> or = 2.8 mm), angiographic restenosis rates were 10.0% with the Cypher stent and 13.1% with the BeStent (P=0.52). CONCLUSION: The drug-eluting stent, Cypher, is associated with a significantly lower risk of restenosis compared with the bare thin-strut BeStent. The advantage of the Cypher stent is vastly reduced in large vessels.     

Sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal low-profile stent for renal artery treatment (GREAT Trial): angiographic follow-up after 6 months and clinical outcome up to 2 years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patency of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS: Between November 2001 to June 2003, 105 consecutive symptomatic patients (53 men; mean age 65.7 years) with RAS were treated with either a bare-metal (n=52) or a drug-eluting (n=53) low-profile Palmaz-Genesis peripheral stent at 11 centers in a prospective nonrandomized trial. The primary endpoint was the angiographic result at 6 months measured with quantitative vessel analysis by an independent core laboratory. Secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, clinical patency [no target lesion revascularization (TLR)], blood pressure and antihypertensive drug use, worsening of renal function, and no major adverse events at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall in-stent diameter stenosis for BMS was 23.9%+/-22.9% versus 18.7%+/-15.6% for SES (p=0.39). The binary restenosis rate was 6.7% for SES versus 14.6% for the BMS (p=0.30). After 6 months and 1 year, TLR rate was 7.7% and 11.5%, respectively, in the BMS group versus 1.9% at both time points in the SES group (p=0.21). This rate remained stable up to the 2-year follow-up but did not reach significance due to the small sample. Even as early as 6 months, both types of stents significantly improved blood pressure and reduced antihypertensive medication compared to baseline (p<0.01). After 6 months, renal function worsened in 4.6% of the BMS patients and in 6.9% of the SES group. The rate of major adverse events was 23.7% for the BMS group and 26.8% for the SES at 2 years (p=0.80). CONCLUSION: The angiographic outcome at 6 months did not show a significant difference between BMS and SES. Renal artery stenting with both stents significantly improved blood pressure. Future studies with a larger patient population and longer angiographic follow-up are warranted to determine if there is a significant benefit of drug-eluting stents in treating ostial renal artery stenosis.     

Sirolimus-eluting stent for in-stent restenosis treatment: single center results in an unselected study population]

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents have already proved to be efficient in the prevention of restenosis in de novo lesions and have been already proposed as a potential treatment of in-stent restenosis. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in unselected patients with in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (59 lesions) were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents for instent restenosis. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and restenosis was evaluated at 1-year clinical and angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 54% of the lesions were complex (46% proliferative and 8% total occlusions). Small vessel size (< or = 2.5 mm) was present in 30%, a long lesion (> 20 mm) in 25%, and diabetes in 42% of the patients. The angiographic follow-up was obtained in 47 patients (55 lesions). Restenosis was observed in 13% of the lesions. At the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 16% (4% acute myocardial infarction, 12% target lesion revascularization). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of instent restenosis in an unselected population of consecutive patients at high risk of restenosis and with a broad range of morphological lesion patterns.     

Long-term clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: five-year results of the RAVEL trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the clinical outcomes at 5 years in RAVEL (A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization), the first controlled trial of drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: The 6-month rate of angiographic coronary restenosis has been markedly lowered by sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The long-term performance of drug-eluting stents, however, is under close scrutiny. METHODS: The trial included 238 patients (mean age 60.7 +/- 10.4 years, 76% men) with a single, de novo native coronary artery lesion, randomly assigned to treatment with SES versus bare-metal stents (BMS). Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization up to 5 years of follow-up, and rates of stent thrombosis were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Complete datasets were available in 92.5% of patients treated with SES and 89.1% of patients assigned to BMS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) were, respectively, 99.2%, 93.8%, and 89.7% in the SES group versus 75.9%, 75.0%, and 74.0% in the control group (p < 0.001; log-rank). Rates of all MACE at 5 years were 25.8% in patients treated with SES versus 35.2% in patients assigned to BMS (p = 0.03; log-rank). Rates of stent thrombosis, per protocol or by the Academic Research Consortium definitions, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year rate of TLR associated with SES was significantly lower than that with BMS. There was no apparent adverse effect associated with the use of SES, although the trial was not powered to examine uncommon complications.     

Single-center randomized evaluation of paclitaxel-eluting versus conventional stent in acute myocardial infarction (SELECTION)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the superiority of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in reducing neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) over its corresponding bare metal stent (BMS) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Primary PCI with stent implantation is the repercussion strategy of choice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); nonetheless restenosis rate is still high. Drug-eluting stents have been proven to reduce restenosis rate in many settings, but their use during primary PCI is still controversial. METHODS: Consecutive patients with STEMI <12 hours were randomized to receive PES or BMS. The primary end-point was the percentage of the stent volume obstructed by neointimal proliferation (NIH) measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at a 7-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary end-points were binary restenosis rate and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e., death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization). RESULTS: Eighty patients with STEMI were randomized into the PES or BMS group. Patients were well matched for baseline characteristics and the index procedure was always successful. In-hospital and 1-month MACE were 2.5% per group. NIH at 7 months was 4.6% versus 20% (P< 0.01), late lumen loss 0.1 versus 1.01 mm (P = 0.01). MACE were 7.5% versus 42.5% (P = 0.001) with no difference in death and recurrent myocardial infarction rates. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) rate was 5.1% versus 2.7% (P = 0.65). One subacute stent thrombosis was reported in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PES was superior to its corresponding BMS in reducing NIH in the STEMI setting without any increase in early and long-term clinical adverse events.     

Clinical and angiographic performance of a new-generation modular stent design for treatment of de novo coronary lesions.

The objectives of the Race Car study were to assess the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic AVE S670 stent, a new-generation stent with a modular design consisting of interconnected sinusoidal rings allowing improved flexibility with good conformability and scaffolding. A total of 285 stents were implanted in 267 patients with (un)stable angina pectoris who underwent angioplasty of a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery with a diameter between 3.0 and 4.0 mm. Available stent lengths were 9, 12, and 15 mm. The primary endpoint was the 6-month restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were device and procedural success and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival at 1 and 6 months. All patients received the study stents and no other stents were used (angiographic success: 100%). Eight patients experienced a MACE during hospital admission (Q-wave MI in 2, non-Q-wave MI in 4, TLR in 2). A procedural success was obtained in 97% of the patients. There were no additional events at 1 month. The clinical endpoints encountered at 6 months were Q-wave MI in 1, bypass surgery in 3, and repeat angioplasty in 25 (MACE-free survival: 86.5%). Quantitative angiographic results were the minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.05 +/- 0.32 before to 2.73 +/- 0.39 mm after stent implantation. At follow-up, the loss in diameter was 0.74 +/- 0.50 mm. The loss index was 0.45 +/- 0.31 and restenosis rate was 13.4%. This study has demonstrated that the S670 stent in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris requiring intervention of a single lesion has a low acute and 6-month major event rate and a low angiographic restenosis rate.     

Usefulness of minimum stent cross sectional area as a predictor of angiographic restenosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial IVUS substudy)

HORIZONS-AMI was a prospective dual-arm randomized trial of different antithrombotic regimens and stent types in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A formal intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy enrolled 464 patients with baseline and 13-month follow-up at 36 centers. Of them, 318 patients with 355 lesions were evaluated for this study. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 45 of 355 lesions (12.7%). Bare-metal stent use (45.5% vs 21.2%, p <0.001) and diabetes mellitus (29.5% vs 10.9%, p <0.001) were more prevalent in patients with versus without restenosis. Postprocedure IVUS minimum lumen area (5.6 mm(2), 5.0 to 6.1, vs 6.7 mm(2), 6.5 to 6.9, p <0.001), minimum stent area (5.7 mm(2), 5.1 to 6.3, vs 6.9 mm(2), 6.6 to 7.1, p <0.001), and reference average lumen area (7.7 mm(2), 6.8 to 8.6, vs 9.7 mm(2), 9.3 to 10.1, p <0.001) were smaller in restenotic versus nonrestenotic lesions. By multivariable analysis, minimum stent area was an independent predictor of angiographic restenosis (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.93, p = 0.009) in addition to diabetes, bare-metal stent use, and longer stent length. Attenuated plaque behind the stent struts had a trend to predict less binary restenosis (p = 0.07). In conclusion, a smaller IVUS minimum stent area was an independent predictor of angiographic restenosis after primary percutaneous intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, similar to patients with stable coronary artery disease.     

Drug-eluting stent restenosis the pattern predicts the outcome.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if the angiographic pattern of in-stent restenosis in drug-eluting stents (DES) maintains its prognostic importance. BACKGROUND: The pattern of restenosis in the bare-metal stent era had a significant impact on therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: We identified a total of 250 consecutive restenotic lesions in 203 patients (66.4% sirolimus-eluting stents and 33.6% paclitaxel-eluting stents). We divided these lesions into two groups: focal, defined as < or =10 mm, 163 lesions (65.2%); and nonfocal, which were diffuse, proliferative, or obstructive, 87 lesions (34.8%). The end points analyzed were angiographic restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Diabetes was the only clinical variable associated with the pattern of restenosis (28.8% focal compared with 52.9% diffuse; p = 0.0001). Angiographic follow-up of the treatment of restenosis was available in 61.2% of the lesions and was similar between the two groups. The rate of angiographic restenosis was 17.8% in the focal group and 51.1% in the nonfocal group (p = 0.0001). The incidence of TLR also increased with the type of restenosis treated (9.8% and 23%, respectively; p = 0.007). An adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that the pattern of restenosis remained associated with both the occurrence of restenosis and TLR (odds ratio [OR] 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 23], p = 0.03; and OR 3.61 [95% CI 1.2 to 10.9], p = 0.02; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to bare-metal stent data, the angiographic pattern of restenosis following DES implantation is prognostically important. Diabetes is a significant predictor of the pattern of restenosis in the DES era.     

Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing

Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (<20% residual stenosis) was achieved in 26.5% of patients. The final minimal luminal diameter and the acute gain were similar in the 2 groups. There was no increase in 30-day major adverse cardiac events in the DCA plus stent group (3.9% vs 2.4%, p = 0.30). The primary end point, angiographic restenosis at 8 months, occurred in 26.7% of patients treated with DCA plus stents and in 22.1% of patients treated with stents alone (p = 0.237). Clinical follow-up to 1 year showed no difference in mortality (1.3% vs 0.8%, p = 0.725), acute myocardial infarction (4.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.706), and target vessel failure (composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (23.9% vs 21.5%, p = 0.487) between patients with DCA plus stents and those with stents alone. This study failed to support the hypothesis that DCA before stenting lowers the angiographic restenosis rate compared with stents alone. At 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in rates of death, reinfarction, or target vessel failure.     

A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions: rationale and design of the PRImary Stenting of Occluded Native coronary arteries III (PRISON III) study

Primary intracoronary drug-eluting stent placement after the successful crossing of total coronary occlusions decreases restenosis rate at long-term follow-up compared with bare-metal stent implantation. The PRISON II trial was the first randomized study to show the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with totally occluded native coronary arteries. The sirolimus-eluting stent is superior to the bare-metal stent in treating patients with total coronary occlusions, with significant reduction in angiographic binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis resulting in significantly reduced need for target lesion and target vessel revascularization. Whether sirolimus-eluting stents are superior to other drug-eluting stents in total coronary occlusions is unknown. In this prospective, randomized trial, sirolimus-eluting stent implantation will be compared with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions. A total of 300 patients will be followed for up to 5 years with angiographic follow-up at 8 months. Quantitative coronary analysis will be performed by an independent core laboratory. The primary end point will be in-segment late luminal loss at 8 months angiographic follow-up.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare, in a randomized fashion, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis and repeated revascularization in native coronary arteries compared with BMS. However, randomized data in SVG are absent. METHODS: Patients with SVG lesions were randomized to SES or BMS. All were scheduled to undergo 6-month coronary angiography. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis, neointimal volume by intravascular ultrasound and major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion, and vessel revascularization). RESULTS: A total of 75 patients with 96 lesions localized in 80 diseased SVGs were included: 38 patients received 60 SES for 47 lesions, whereas 37 patients received 54 BMS for 49 lesions. In-stent late loss was significantly reduced in SES (0.38 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 0.79 +/- 0.66 mm in BMS, p = 0.001). Binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis were reduced, 11.3% versus 30.6% (relative risk [RR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 to 0.97, p = 0.024) and 13.6% versus 32.6% (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, p = 0.031), respectively. Median neointimal volume was 1 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13) in SES versus 24 (interquartile range 8 to 34) in BMS (p < 0.001). Target lesion and vessel revascularization rates were significantly reduced, 5.3% versus 21.6% (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.0, p = 0.047) and 5.3% versus 27% (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, p = 0.012), respectively. Death and myocardial infarction rates were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce late loss in SVG as opposed to BMS. This is associated with a reduction in restenosis rate and repeated target lesion and vessel revascularization procedures. (The RRISC Study; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show; NCT00263263).     

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We compared the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents with that of bare-metal stents in patients who experienced acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. To do this, we performed a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials in which drug-eluting stents were compared with bare-metal stents in STEMI patients. The trials involved 6,769 patients (4,246 received drug-eluting stents and 2,523 received bare-metal stents) and follow-up periods of 6 to 48 months. In comparison with bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.73; P < 0.00001). Drug-eluting stents were not associated with a significant reduction in overall death (RR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.20; P = 0.64), but were associated with significant reductions in recurrent myocardial infarction (RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P = 0.03), target-vessel revascularization (RR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.56; P <0.00001), and in-stent restenosis (RR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.39; P < 0.00001). Moreover, no significant difference was found in the comparative risk of stent thrombosis (RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.14; P = 0.27).On the basis of risk ratio, we conclude that using drug-eluting stents in STEMI patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention is safe with regard to stent thrombosis within 48 months, and that drug-eluting stents improve clinical outcomes by reducing the risks of major adverse cardiac events, recurrent myocardial infarction, reintervention, and in-stent restenosis, compared with bare-metal stents. However, in order to investigate possible very late stent thrombosis, follow-up of these trials beyond 48 months is warranted.     

An angiographic evaluation of restenosis rate at a six-month follow-up of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered to be the optimal type of revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the long-term effectiveness of this procedure can be reduced by restenosis. This investigation was aimed at a prospective evaluation, in a group of STEMI patients of "the real world" (not involved in randomised trials), of the angiographic restenosis rate at a 6-month follow-up, and at identifying the relationship between restenosis and the patients' characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study population consisted of 123 patients with STEMI submitted to primary PCI to then undergo stress echocardiography 3 months after PCI and an angiographic evaluation at a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: a) In real life the restenosis rate is quite high (42.3%); b) no correlation was found between patients' clinical characteristics and restenosis; c) restenosis rate was higher in patients with bare metal stents than in those with drug-eluting stents (55.8% vs. 11.1%; p<0.001); in patients with longer stents (21.6+/-8.62 vs 18.1+/-6.34 mm, p=0.015) and when more than one stent was implanted. Moreover, a consistent number of patients showed restenosis though asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that primary PCI is associated with a high incidence of angiographic restenosis. No correlation was found between patients' clinical characteristics and restenosis. The length and the number of implanted stents seem to be associated with a more probable restenosis at six-month angiographic evaluation. Drug-eluting stent implantation seems to be associated with a lower incidence of restenosis even in STEMI patients.     

Angiographic findings,time course of regional and global left ventricular function,and clinical outcome in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

There is scarce information available about the outcome of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We sought to compare left ventricular (LV) function, and angiographic and clinical outcomes in diabetics versus nondiabetics with AMI treated with primary PTCA. This study examined 720 consecutive patients with AMI treated with primary PTCA, 102 of whom had diabetes. Six-month follow-up coronary angiography was obtained in 560 patients (88% of eligible patients). In a subgroup of 284 patients, LV function was serially determined by 2-dimensional echocardiography. During 6-month follow-up no significant differences were observed between diabetics and nondiabetics with regard to restenosis rates (31.6% vs 28.2%, p = 0.6), recovery of LV function (6-month wall motion score index: 1.8 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.7, p = 0.88; 6-month LV ejection fraction: 48.5 +/- 12% vs 51.2 +/- 13%, p = 0.173), nonfatal re-AMI rates (2.9% vs 1.3%, p = 0.2), and target vessel revascularization rates (21.6% vs 16.8%, p = 0.2). Early and late mortality were higher in diabetics than in nondiabetic patients (8.8% vs 4.2%, p = 0.045 and 11.7% vs 5.5%, p = 0.016, respectively). By Cox analysis, diabetes was an independent predictor of both early (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 5.3, p = 0.03) and late mortality (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.84, p = 0.017) as well as 6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACEs): death, re-AMI, target vessel revascularization (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.18, p = 0.03). Thus, diabetes is an independent predictor of clinical outcome even if PTCA is used as the primary reperfusion strategy.     

Sirolimus-eluting stents vs bare metal stents for coronary intervention in Japanese patients with renal failure on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated atherosclerosis is a major risk for long-term survivors receiving hemodialysis (HD), with coronary events being the leading cause of mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 88 consecutive patients on HD (121 lesions) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) were compared with 78 patients on HD (95 lesions) who received bare metal stents (BMS) in the preceding 1 year. The primary endpoint was angiographic restenosis defined as > or =50% diameter stenosis at 6-8 months follow-up after PCI. The angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up was 22.2% in the SES group and 24.4% in the BMS group. No difference was detected in the restenosis rate between the 2 groups (p=0.73). When including both HD and non-HD patients, the independent predictors for restenosis after SES implantation were treatment with HD (hazard ratio (HR) 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-7.95; p=0.016), incidence of hyperlipidemia (HR 3.93; 95%CI 1.12-13.7; p=0.032), coronary calcification (HR 2.78; 95%CI 1.12-6.91; p=0.027), and implantation of multi-stents (HR 4.14; 95%CI 1.70-10.1; p=0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: Even if treated with SES, patients with end-stage renal failure on HD are at high risk of restenosis after PCI.     

Increased late mortality after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diseased saphenous vein grafts: results from the randomized DELAYED RRISC Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to provide long-term follow-up data of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) from the RRISC (Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous vein grafts with Cypher) trial. BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that, in SVG, the use of SES reduces 6-month restenosis and repeated revascularization procedures versus the use of BMS. These data are consistent with trials in native coronary arteries. However, recently published long-term follow-up data of these trials have revealed an increased risk of adverse events (particularly very late stent thrombosis) after SES. METHODS: A total of 75 patients with 96 SVG lesions were randomized to SES versus BMS. All patients underwent clinical follow-up up to 3 years. Specific outcomes assessed in this secondary post-hoc analysis were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received 60 SES for 47 lesions, whereas 37 patients received 54 BMS for 49 lesions. At a median follow-up time of 32 months (interquartile range 26.5 to 36 months), 11 deaths (7 cardiac, of which 1 was caused by very late stent thrombosis and, 3 were sudden) occurred after SES (29% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17% to 45%]) versus 0 after BMS (0% [95% CI 0% to 9%]) with an absolute difference of 29% ([95% CI 14% to 45%], p < 0.001). The rates of myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization were not different: 18% and 34% after SES, respectively, versus 5% and 38% after BMS, respectively (p = 0.15 and p = 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary post-hoc analysis, BMS were associated with lower long-term mortality than SES for SVG disease. Also, the 6-month reduction in repeated revascularization procedures with SES was lost at longer-term follow-up. (RRISC Study: Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous Vein Grafts With Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00263263?order=1; NCT00263263).