Alcohol consumption and endometrial cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort

The role of alcohol intake in the etiology of endometrial cancer is unclear. We examined the impact of alcohol intake on endometrial cancer risk among 41,574 postmenopausal African-American, Japanese-American, Latina, Native-Hawaiian and White women recruited to the prospective Multiethnic Cohort Study in 1993-1996. During an average of 8.3 years of follow-up, 324 incident invasive endometrial cancer cases were identified among these women. Data on alcohol intake and endometrial cancer risk factors were obtained from the baseline questionnaire. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for endometrial cancer associated with alcohol intake were estimated using log-linear (Cox) proportional hazard models stratified by age, year of recruitment, ethnicity and study center, and adjusted for several confounding factors. Increased alcohol consumption was associated with increased risk (p trend = 0.013). Compared to nondrinkers, women consuming >or=2 drinks/day had a multivariate RR of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.30, 3.11). There was no increase in risk associated with <1 drink/day (RR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.33) and 1 to <2 drinks/day (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.93). There was no clear effect modification by body mass index, postmenopausal hormone use, parity, oral contraceptive use or smoking status, though our power to detect such interactions was limited. Our results suggest that only alcohol consumption equivalent to 2 or more drinks per day increases risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women.     

Prospective study of alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk in Japanese women

Epidemiologic evidence is lacking for the association between alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. We addressed this association in a prospective cohort study with an average follow-up of 7.6 years. At baseline (1988-1990), cohort participants completed a self-administered questionnaire that included alcohol use, reproductive history and hormone use. The women were followed up for breast cancer incidence through December 31, 1997. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer incidence and any association with alcohol consumption. During a follow-up of 271,412 person-years, we identified 151 women with breast cancer, of whom 45 were current drinkers and 11 drank > or =15 g of alcohol/day. After adjustment for age and other potential risk factors for breast cancer, the RR for current drinkers was 1.27 (95% CI 0.87-1.84) compared to nondrinkers. Average alcohol intake of <15 g/day did not significantly increase the risk for breast cancer. However, risk was significantly increased for women who consumed > or =15 g/day of alcohol (RR = 2.93, 95% CI 1.55-5.54). Age at starting drinking and frequency of consumption per week were not significantly associated with breast cancer risk. Our cohort study demonstrated that Japanese women who consume at least a moderate amount of alcohol have an increased risk of breast cancer.     

Alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer in a prepaid health plan

We examined breast cancer incidence in a cohort of about 69,000 women who were members of a large prepaid health plan in Northern California and who answered detailed questions about alcohol consumption from 1979 through 1984 as part of a voluntary multiphasic health checkup. Among white, black, and Hispanic women with no prior cancer, breast cancer had developed in 303 by the end of 1984. In analysis controlling only for age there was a progressive increase in breast cancer incidence with each higher level of reported alcohol consumption. In multivariate analyses controlled for age, race, body mass, and smoking, the relative risk at 1-2 drinks per day was 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.3], at 3-5 drinks per day it was 1.5 (95% CI 0.8-2.8), and at 6 or more drinks per day it was 3.3 (95% CI 1.2-9.3). Past drinkers tended to have been heavier drinkers than current drinkers and had a relative risk of 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-3.9). Study of wine, beer, and liquor use did not suggest that any particular alcoholic beverage was responsible. Significant associations with heavy alcohol consumption were strongest among white, and among postmenopausal women. This study adds support to the growing evidence that alcohol may be a risk factor for development of breast cancer.     

Alcohol consumption and incidence of benign breast disease.

We evaluated whether moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk of developing benign breast disease (BBD), a potential "precursor" or marker for breast cancer development. This study evaluated associations between reported alcohol consumption and BBD diagnosis among 75,826 women in the Nurses' Health Study II. Between 1989 and 1997, 16,035 women reported a first diagnosis of BBD (317/10,000 person-years), of which 2,999 diagnoses were confirmed by tissue biopsy (59/10,000 person-years). Of the pathology specimens reviewed, 532 were nonproliferative benign breast conditions, and 932 were proliferative conditions. Person-time models provided estimates of the rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Reported recent adult consumption of alcohol was not associated with increased BBD incidence. Compared with women who did not drink alcohol, the age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted RRs for any reported BBD were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-1.02) for those who consumed <5 g/day, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) for those who consumed 5-14.9 g/day, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.98) for those who consumed >or=15 g/day. The adjusted RRs for biopsy confirmed BBD and any proliferative benign condition were similiar. However, reported alcohol consumption of >or=15 g/day between ages 18 and 22 years was associated with higher rates of biopsy-confirmed BBD (age- and body mass index-adjusted RR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.30), nonproliferative BBD (RR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.96), and any proliferative BBD (RR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.69), but not atypical hyperplasia. In this study, recent alcohol consumption was associated with slightly lower rates of reported BBD. However, greater alcohol consumption earlier in life (ages 18-22 years) was associated with higher proliferative BBD rates, suggesting that timing of exposure may be relevant to disease incidence.     

Breast cancer risk among women who start smoking as teenagers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of smoking on breast cancer risk in a large population-based cohort of women, many of whom started smoking as teenagers.METHODS: We followed 102,098 women, ages 30 to 50 years, completing a mailed questionnaire at recruitment to the Norwegian-Swedish Cohort Study in 1991/1992, through December 2000. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate relative risk (RR) of breast cancer associated with different measures of smoking initiation, duration, and intensity adjusting for confounding variables. We conducted analyses on the entire study population, among women who had smoked for at least 20 years, among nondrinkers, and separately for each country.RESULTS: Altogether, 1,240 women were diagnosed with incident, invasive breast cancer. Compared with never smokers, women who smoked for at least 20 years and who smoked 10 cigarettes or more daily had a RR of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.06-1.70). Likewise, those who initiated smoking prior to their first birth (1.27, 1.00-1.62), before menarche (1.39, 1.03-1.87), or before age 15 (1.48, 1.03-2.13) had an increased risk. In contrast, women who had smoked for at least 20 years, but started after their first birth, did not experience an increased breast cancer risk. The increased RR associated with smoking was observed among nondrinkers of alcohol, women with and without a family history of breast cancer, premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and in both countries.CONCLUSION: Our results support the notion that women who start smoking as teenagers and continue to smoke for at least 20 years may increase their breast cancer risk.     

Egg consumption and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The relationship between egg consumption and breast cancer risk has been inconsistent, so it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship. PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched to find cohort studies or case control studies that evaluated the relationship between egg consumption and breast cancer risk. A comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. 13 studies were included. The meta-analysis results showed that egg consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01–1.08). Subgroup analyses showed egg consumption was also associated with increased breast cancer risk based on cohort studies (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.00–1.08), among European population (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.01–1.09), Asian population (RR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.00–1.18), postmenopausal population (RR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.02–1.10), and those who consumed ≥2, ≤5/week (RR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.02–1.17), but not in case–control studies (RR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.97–1.15), among American population (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.94–1.16), premenopausal population (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.98–1.11) and those who consumed ≥1, <2/week (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.97–1.11) or >5 eggs/week (RR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.88–1.06). Egg consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk among the European, Asian and postmenopausal population and those who consumed ≥2, ≤5/week.     

Alcohol, wine, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Moderate alcohol intake can influence sex hormone levels and affect ovarian function as well as increasing breast cancer risk. This suggests that alcohol might also influence ovarian cancer risk. We have evaluated this among 696 Australian women with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer and 786 cancer-free control women, selected at random from the electoral roll. Sociodemographic information and a detailed reproductive history were collected in a face-to-face interview, and information about diet and alcohol consumption was obtained from a food frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Overall, 59% of women drank <1 standard drink/week and only 5% of cases and 8% of controls drank an average of > or =2 standard drinks/day. Compared with nondrinkers, the OR for women who drank an average of > or =2 standard drinks/day was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.30-0.81). This effect did not vary for the different subtypes but was restricted to wine (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.33-0.93 for > or =1 glass/day versus nondrinkers) with no effect for beer (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.65-2.46) or sherry/spirits (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.59-1.95). Combining our results with the six previous population-based studies gave a pooled OR of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.54-0.97) for the highest alcohol intake group versus nondrinkers. These data suggest that alcohol does not increase risk of ovarian cancer. In this Australian population, the inverse association with alcohol was due solely to wine consumption and so may be a consequence of antioxidants and/or phytoestrogens in wine rather than the alcohol itself.     

Prospective study of exogenous hormone use and breast cancer in Seventh-day Adventists

Exogenous hormone use as either oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was evaluated in reference to subsequent breast cancer risk in a cohort study of 20,341 Seventh-day Adventist women, residing in California, who completed a detailed lifestyle questionnaire in 1976 and who were followed for 6 years. During the follow-up period, 215 histologically confirmed primary breast cancers were detected in the cohort. The mean age at diagnosis was 66 years, indicating a primarily postmenopausal case series. In this cohort, after taking into account potentially confounding variables, current use of HRT (in 1976) was associated with a 69% increase in breast cancer risk, which was statistically significant (RR = 1.69; CI = 1.12-2.55). However, there was no strong increase in risk with increasing duration of use of HRT. Subgroups of women who did experience HRT associated increases in breast cancer risk included those women who had ever used HRT (RR = 1.39; CI = 1.00-1.94) and those with no history of maternal breast cancer (RR = 1.45), those women with prior benign breast disease (RR = 2.80), and those women who experienced menopause at 44 years of age or later (RR = 1.56). There was no substantial increase in breast cancer risk associated with use of OC in this population, although among women with exposure to both OC and HRT there was a suggested increase in risk (RR = 1.42; CI = 0.71-2.85).     

Dietary carotenoids and vitamins A, C, and E and risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Data on intake of specific carotenoids and breast cancer risk are limited. Furthermore, studies of vitamins A, C, and E in relation to breast cancer risk are inconclusive. We have conducted a large, prospective study to evaluate long-term intakes of these nutrients and breast cancer risk. METHODS: We examined, by use of multivariate analysis, associations between intakes of specific carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E , consumption of fruits and vegetables, and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 83234 women (aged 33-60 years in 1980) who were participating in the Nurses' Health Study. Through 1994, we identified 2697 incident cases of invasive breast cancer (784 premenopausal and 1913 postmenopausal). RESULTS: Intakes of beta-carotene from food and supplements, lutein/zeaxanthin, and vitamin A from foods were weakly inversely associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Strong inverse associations were found for increasing quintiles of alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, total vitamin C from foods, and total vitamin A among premenopausal women with a positive family history of breast cancer. An inverse association was also found for increasing quintiles of beta-carotene among premenopausal women who consumed 15 g or more of alcohol per day. Premenopausal women who consumed five or more servings per day of fruits and vegetables had modestly lower risk of breast cancer than those who had less than two servings per day (relative risk [RR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.02); this association was stronger among premenopausal women who had a positive family history of breast cancer (RR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.13-0.62) or those who consumed 15 g or more of alcohol per day (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.27-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of fruits and vegetables high in specific carotenoids and vitamins may reduce premenopausal breast cancer risk.     

Hormone replacement therapy and incidence of hormone-dependent cancers in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study

Increasing use of HRT over the last 2 decades could have contributed to the increasing incidence of cancer in women. Our aim was to investigate the relation between use of HRT and risk of hormone-dependent cancers in a Norwegian cohort of women. The Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) study is a representative, national, population-based cohort study. This report includes 35,456 postmenopausal women aged 45-64 years who answered a postal questionnaire in 1996-1998 providing information on reproduction, lifestyle and use of HRT. The women were followed up for cancer incidence. The main analyses were restricted to 31,451 postmenopausal women with complete information. Ever use of HRT was reported by 43.5% and current use, by 35% of the women. Current users had an increased risk of breast cancer (adjusted RR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.5). The risk increased with increasing duration of use (ptrend < 0.0001). Using a regimen of continuous estrogen-progestagen implied an increased risk. Adjusted RRs associated with <5 and > or =5 years' duration of use were 2.6 (95% CI 1.9-3.7) and 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.6), respectively. The population-attributable risk of breast cancer due to current use of HRT was 27%. We found no significant increase in risk of ovarian cancer. Neither did we find users of estrogen-progestagen preparations to have any increase in risk of endometrial cancer. Our results suggest that HRT could be considered a major determinant for the increasing incidence of breast cancer in Norway.     

Alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk among women from five ethnic groups with light to moderate intakes: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

Higher alcohol consumption, even at moderate levels, has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in epidemiological studies. However, prior studies were conducted in mostly white populations. To assess the relationship of alcohol consumption to postmenopausal breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population of largely never, light or moderate drinkers, we prospectively examined the association in 85,089 women enrolled in the Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and California. During a mean follow‐up of 12.4 years, 3,885 incident invasive breast cancer cases were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models, controlling for potential confounders. Higher alcohol consumption was associated with increased risk of breast cancer: compared to nondrinkers, HRs were 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06–1.42), 1.21 (95% CI: 1.00–1.45), 1.12 (95% CI: 0.95–1.31) and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.32–1.77) for 5–9.9, 10–14.9, 15–29.9 and ≥30 g/day of alcohol, respectively. The positive association was seen in African American, Japanese American, Latino and white, but not in Native Hawaiian women, and in those with tumors that were both positive and negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR). This prospective study supports previous findings that light to moderate alcohol consumption increases breast cancer risk, and demonstrates this association in several ethnic groups besides whites, independent of ER/PR status.     

ADH3 genotype, alcohol intake and breast cancer risk

Moderate alcohol consumption of approximately 1-2 drinks per day has been associated with a 30-50% increase in breast cancer risk. Individuals differ in their ability to metabolize alcohol through genetic differences in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), the enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of approximately 80% of ethanol to acetaldehyde, a known carcinogen. Individuals differ in their ADH genotype, and one locus in particular (ADH3) is polymorphic in Caucasian populations. Using data from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, we examined whether fast metabolizers of alcohol, as measured by the ADH3(1-1) genotype, have a higher risk of breast cancer from alcohol intake compared with those individuals who are slow metabolizers, but consume similar amounts of alcohol. We combined genotyping information with questionnaire data on 1047 breast cancer cases and 1101 controls and used unconditional logistic regression methods to estimate multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between alcohol intake and breast cancer risk. Among individuals homozygous for the fast metabolizing allele (ADH(3)1-1), a lifetime alcohol consumption of 15-30 g/day (approximately 1-2 drinks per day) increased breast cancer risk by 2-fold (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.1-3.5). In contrast, the increase in risk from a lifetime alcohol consumption of 15-30 g/day was less pronounced in the intermediate and slow metabolizing groups, respectively: ADH3(1-2) (OR=1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.4) and ADH(3)2-2 (OR=1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.5). Fast metabolizers who drank 15-30 g/day of alcohol had 2.3 times (95% CI 1.3-4.0) greater risk of breast cancer than non-drinkers who were intermediate or slow metabolizers. This association for fast metabolizers who drank 15-30 g/day was particularly pronounced among premenopausal women (premenopausal women OR=2.9, 95 % CI=1.2-7.1; postmenopausal women OR=1.8, 95% CI=0.9-3.8). These population-based data support the hypothesis that fast metabolizers of alcohol have a higher risk of breast cancer risk, from alcohol intake than slow metabolizers.     

Is alcohol consumption related to breast cancer? Results from the Framingham Heart Study

We studied the relation between alcohol consumption and breast cancer among women in the Framingham Heart Study cohort. A total of 2,636 women aged 31-64 years provided information on alcohol consumption at the second biennial examination. They were followed for up to 32 years; during this period, breast cancer was diagnosed in 143 of these women. Alcohol intake was also assessed at 10 and 20 years of follow-up and every 2 years thereafter. In analyses using only baseline alcohol intake, the multiple risk factor-adjusted relative risk (RR) estimate of breast cancer for any drinking, compared with nondrinking, was 0.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-1.1]. For three levels of alcohol intake (0.1-1.4 g/day, 1.5-4.9 g/day, and greater than or equal to 5.0 g/day), the baseline analyses yielded RRs (vs. nondrinking) of 1.0 (CI, 0.6-1.5), 0.7 (CI, 0.4-1.1), and 0.6 (CI, 0.4-1.0), respectively. In analyses incorporating repeated measures of alcohol, the comparable RRs were 0.9 (CI, 0.6-1.2) for any drinking (vs. nondrinking) and 0.7 (CI, 0.4-1.4), 1.1 (CI, 0.7-1.8), and 0.8 (CI, 0.5-1.2), respectively, for the three levels of intake (vs. nondrinking). Alcohol consumption was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in this cohort.     

Plasma folate,vitamin B6, vitamin B12, homocysteine,and risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: In several epidemiologic investigations, folate intake has appeared to reduce the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with moderate alcohol consumption. However, data relating plasma folate levels to breast cancer risk are sparse. We investigated the association between plasma folate and other vitamins with breast cancer in a prospective, nested case-control study. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained during 1989 and 1990 from 32 826 women in the Nurses' Health Study who were followed through 1996 for the development of breast cancer. We identified 712 breast cancer case patients and selected 712 individually matched control subjects. Dietary information was obtained using food frequency questionnaires given in 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer (after adjustment for potential risk factors), and a generalized linear model was used to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficients between plasma estimates of folate, vitamin B(6), vitamin B(12), and homocysteine, and intakes of folate, vitamin B(6), and vitamin B(12). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma folate with those in the lowest was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.07; P(trend) =.06). The inverse association between plasma folate and breast cancer risk was highly statistically significant among women consuming at least 15 g/day (i.e., approximately 1 drink/day) of alcohol (multivariable RR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.59 for highest versus lowest quintile) in contrast with that of women consuming less than 15 g/day (multivariable RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.05). The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma vitamin B(6) levels with those in the lowest quintile was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.48 to 1.02; P(trend) =.09). Plasma vitamin B(12) levels were inversely associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women (multivariable RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.86 for highest versus lowest quintile) but not among postmenopausal women. Plasma homocysteine was not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Higher plasma levels of folate and possibly vitamin B(6) may reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. Achieving adequate circulating levels of folate may be particularly important for women at higher risk of developing breast cancer because of higher alcohol consumption.     

Alcohol consumption and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of Swedish women

Previous literature, although not consistent, suggests that moderate alcohol consumption might be associated with decreased risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in women. Thus, we examined the association between alcohol intake and the incidence of RCC by analyzing data from the Swedish Mammography Cohort, a population-based prospective cohort of 59,237 women, aged 40-76 years, who, at baseline in 1987-1990, were cancer free and had completed a food-frequency questionnaire including questions about alcohol consumption. Through June 30, 2004, 132 incident cases of RCC were diagnosed. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate age and body mass index (BMI) adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Women who consumed >4.3 grams per day of alcohol (ethanol) had nonsignificantly lower risk of RCC than did women who consumed <2.5 g/d (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.19); among women > or = 55 years of age at entry into the cohort, corresponding risk estimates were RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.10-1.05, p for trend = 0.04 and among women with BMI >25 kg/m2, RR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.97, p for trend = 0.04. Consistent with these findings, women who drank 1 or more servings of total alcoholic beverages per week had lower RCC risk than did women who drank less (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94); the corresponding estimate for women > or = 55 years of age was RR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.88. Results from our prospective cohort study of middle-aged and elderly women indicate that moderate alcohol consumption may be associated with decreased risk of RCC.     

Sugar-sweetened soft drink consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer in two prospective cohorts.

BACKGROUND: A history of diabetes mellitus and a diet high in glycemic load are both potential risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Sugar-sweetened soft drinks are a prevalent source of readily absorbable sugars and have been associated with an increased risk of obesity and diabetes. We investigated whether higher consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks increases the risk of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We examined the relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and the development of pancreatic cancer in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Among 88,794 women and 49,364 men without cancer at baseline, we documented 379 cases of pancreatic cancer during up to 20 years of follow-up. Soft drink consumption was first assessed at baseline (1980 for the women, 1986 for the men) and updated periodically thereafter. RESULTS: Compared with participants who largely abstained from sugar-sweetened soft drinks, those who consumed more than three sugar-sweetened soft drinks weekly experienced overall a multivariate relative risk (RR) of pancreatic cancer of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.81-1.58; P for trend = 0.47]. Women in the highest category of sugar-sweetened soft drink intake did experience a significant increase in risk (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02-2.41; P for trend = 0.05), whereas there was no association between sweetened soft drink intake and pancreatic cancer among men. Among women, the risk associated with higher sugar-sweetened soft drink was limited to those with elevated body mass index (>25 kg/m(2); RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.96-3.72) or with low physical activity (RR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06-3.85). In contrast, consumption of diet soft drinks was not associated with an elevated pancreatic cancer risk in either cohort. CONCLUSION: Although soft drink consumption did not influence pancreatic cancer risk among men, consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks may be associated with a modest but significant increase in risk among women who have an underlying degree of insulin resistance.     

Effect of prediagnostic alcohol consumption on survival after breast cancer in young women

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption has been comprehensively investigated as an etiologic risk factor for breast cancer but has received little attention in terms of its effect on prognosis after breast cancer, particularly for young women. METHODS: 1,286 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age < or =45 years from two population-based case-control studies in the Seattle-Puget Sound region were followed from their diagnosis of breast cancer (between January 1983 and December 1992) for survival through June 2002, during which time 364 women had died. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the effect of prediagnostic alcohol consumption on the risk of dying. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and diagnosis year, compared with nondrinkers, women who consumed alcohol in the 5 years before diagnosis had a decreased risk of death [>0 to <3 drinks per week: hazard ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.6-0.95; 3 to <7 drinks per week: risk ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8;7 drinks per week: risk ratio, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9]. This association was unchanged on additional adjustment for potential confounders including most notably treatment, stage at diagnosis, and mammogram history. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that women who consume alcohol before a diagnosis of breast cancer have improved survival, which does not appear to be attributable to differences in stage, screening, or treatment.     

Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and breast cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Earlier data support the hypothesis that the relation between circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels and breast cancer risk differs by menopausal status. The strong association of IGF-I with height in childhood and weak or no association between adult levels and adult height also suggest that IGF levels in young women may better reflect an exposure time period of importance to breast cancer. Few studies have assessed IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) or free IGF and breast cancer risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a large case-control study nested within the prospective Nurses' Health Study. Plasma concentrations of IGF-I, free IGF, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-1 were measured in blood samples collected in 1989 to 1990. Eight hundred women were identified who had a diagnosis of invasive or in situ breast cancer after blood collection, up to 1998, 27% of whom were premenopausal at blood collection. To those 800 women, one to two controls were age-matched for a total of 1,129 controls. We used logistic regression models to estimate the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer associated with IGF levels.Findings: Among postmenopausal women, neither IGF-I, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-1, nor free IGF was associated with breast cancer risk [RRs, top versus bottom quintile: IGF-I, 1.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.7-1.4; IGFBP-3, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.1; IGFBP-1, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5; and free IGF, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.4]. Among premenopausal women, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-1, and free IGF similarly were not associated with breast cancer risk (RRs, top versus bottom quintile: IGFBP-3, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-2.3; IGFBP-1, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-3.0; and free IGF, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-2.1). Higher IGF-I plasma levels, however, were associated with a modestly elevated breast cancer risk (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.6) among the premenopausal women, with a stronger association among premenopausal women ages < or =50 (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3); further adjustment for IGFBP-3 did not greatly change these estimates. INTERPRETATION: Circulating IGF-I levels seem to be modestly associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women, but not among postmenopausal women. IGFBP-3, IGFBP-1, and free IGF are not associated with breast cancer risk in either premenopausal or postmenopausal women in this cohort.     

A prospective study of stomach cancer among a rural Japanese population: a 6-year survey.

Stomach cancer mortality was prospectively studied among 9753 Japanese men and women who first responded to a mailed questionnaire in 1985 and were then followed through May 31, 1991. During this follow-up period, 57 stomach cancer deaths were identified. Current smokers had an increased risk of deaths from stomach cancer compared with never smokers (relative risk (RR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-4.56), but there was no dose-response to amount of cigarettes smoked. Daily alcohol drinkers who consumed 50 ml or more of alcohol per day also had a greater risk than nondrinkers (RR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.35-6.91). There was no association between stomach cancer mortality and individual food consumption except a positive association with fruit intake. However, frequent use (greater than or equal to 3-4/week) of broiling of meats and traditional style Japanese salad preparation in their cooking procedures were positively associated with stomach cancer mortality. The RR values compared with infrequent use (less than or equal to 1-2/month) were 2.27 (95% CI: 1.06-4.85) and 3.10 (95% CI: 1.40-6.85), respectively. A positive family history of cancer, especially stomach cancer, significantly increased the risk of stomach cancer deaths (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.12-3.63). The effects of these variables remained after adjustment for other variables.