Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical chest radiographs of a large-area, flat-panel digital radiography system and a conventional film-screen radiography system. The comparison was based on an observer preference study of image quality and visibility of anatomic structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine follow-up chest radiographs were obtained from 100 consecutive oncology patients using a large-area, amorphous silicon flat-panel detector digital radiography system (dose equivalent to a 400-speed film system). Hard-copy images were compared with previous examinations of the same individuals taken on a conventional film-screen system (200-speed). Patients were excluded if changes in the chest anatomy were detected or if the time interval between the examinations exceeded 1 year. Observer preference was evaluated for the image quality and the visibility of 15 anatomic structures using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Dose measurements with a chest phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 50% with the digital radiography system compared with the film-screen radiography system. The image quality and the visibility of all but one anatomic structure of the images obtained with the digital flat-panel detector system were rated significantly superior (p < or = 0.0003) to those obtained with the conventional film-screen radiography system. CONCLUSION: The image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on the images obtained by the flat-panel detector system were perceived as equal or superior to the images from conventional film-screen chest radiography. This was true even though the radiation dose was reduced approximately 50% with the digital flat-panel detector system.     

Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality and the potential for radiation dose reduction with a digital flat-panel amorphous silicon detector radiography system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using flat-panel technology, radiographs of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom were taken with a range of technical parameters (125kV, 200mA and 5, 4, 3.2, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.25mAs) which were equivalent to a radiation dose of 332, 263, 209, 127, 58.7, 29, and 14 microGy, respectively. These images were compared to radiographs obtained by a conventional film-screen radiography system at 125kV, 200mA and 5mAs (equivalent to 252 microGy) which served as reference. Three observers evaluated independently the visibility of simulated rounded lesions and anatomical structures, comparing printed films from the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector and conventional x-ray system films. RESULTS: With flat-panel technology, the visibility of rounded lesions and normal anatomical structures at 5, 4, and 3.2mAs was superior compared to the conventional film-screen radiography system. (P< or =0.0001). At 2mAs, improvement was only marginal (P=0.19). At 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25mAs, the visibility of simulated rounded lesions was worse (P< or =0.004). Comparing fine lung parenchymal structures, the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector showed improvement for all exposure levels down to 2mAs and equality at 1mAs. CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional x-ray film system, the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector demonstrated improved image quality and the possibility for a reduction of the radiation dose by 50% without loss in image quality.     

Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector for performing routine chest radiography at two different detector doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chest radiographs of 50 patients (age range, 16-79 years; mean age, 57 years) were obtained at two different detector dose levels. Digital images were taken from the same patients in posteroanterior and lateral views with detector doses of 2.5 microGy and 1.8 microGy, respectively, at 125 kVp tube voltage. The cesium iodide-amorphous silicon active-matrix imager had a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, a matrix of 3000 x 3000, and a pixel pitch of 143 microm. Images were presented in a random order to three independent radiologists who were unaware of the dose level at which the images had been obtained. They subjectively rated image quality on a 4-point scale, according to six criteria (presentation of obscured lung, unobscured lung, airways, mediastinum and hilum, bony thorax, and overall impression). Statistical significance of differences was evaluated with Student's t test for paired samples (confidence level, 95%). RESULTS: Digital radiographs obtained at 2.5 and 1.8 microGy were equivalent on all quality criteria. No statistically significant differences and no tendency toward a preference for images obtained at one or the other dose level were observed. According to the registered mAs values, the average difference in patient dose was 33%. CONCLUSION: Use of flat-panel digital imagers based on the cesium iodide-amorphous silicon technique allows a considerable dose reduction during routine chest radiography without loss of image quality.     

Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector (FD), based on caesium-iodide (CsI) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) with respect to skeletal radiography. Conventional images were compared with digital radiographs using identical and reduced radiation doses.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were studied prospectively using conventional screen-film radiography (SFR; detector dose 2.5 microGy). Digital images were taken from the same patients with detector doses of 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 microGy, respectively. The active-matrix detector had a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, a matrix of 3 x 3K, and a pixel size of 143 microm. All hard copies were presented in a random order to eight independent observers, who rated image quality according to subjective quality criteria. Results were assessed for significance using the Student's t -test (confidence level 95%).RESULTS: A statistically significant preference for digital over conventional images was revealed for all quality criteria, except for over-exposure (detector dose 2.5 microGy). Digital images with a 50% dose showed a small, statistically not significant, inferiority compared with SFR. The FD-technique was significantly inferior to SFR at 75% dose reduction regarding bone cortex and trabecula, contrast and overall impression. No statistically significant differences were found with regard to over- and under-exposure and soft tissue presentation.CONCLUSION: Amorphous silicon-based digital radiography yields good image quality. The potential for dose reduction depends on the clinical query.     

Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background,basic image quality parameters,and review of the literature

The two most frequently performed diagnostic X-ray examinations are those of the extremities and of the chest. Thus, dose reduction in the field of conventional skeletal and chest radiography is an important issue and there is a need to reduce man-made ionizing radiation. The large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide provides a significant reduction of radiation dose in skeletal and chest radiography compared with traditional imaging systems. This article describes the technical background and basic image quality parameters of this 43×43-cm digital system, and summarizes the available literature (years 2000–2003) concerning dose reduction in experimental and clinical studies. Due to its high detective quantum efficiency and dynamic range compared with traditional screen-film systems, a dose reduction of up to 50% is possible without loss of image quality.Abbreviations FD Large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide - SFR Screen-film radiography - SPR Storage phosphor radiography - DQE Detective quantum efficiency - MTF Modulation transfer function - lp/mm Line pairs per millimeter - ROC Receiver operating characteristic     

Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study

The aim of this study was to investigate the image quality for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector at various radiation dose settings and to compare the results with storage phosphor plates and a screen-film system. A CDRAD 2.0 contrast-detail phantom was imaged with a flat-panel detector (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at three different dose levels with settings for intravenous urography. The same phantom was imaged with storage phosphor plates at a simulated system speed of 200 and a screen-film system with a system speed of 160. Entrance surface doses were recorded for all images. At each setting, three images were read by four independent observers. The flat-panel detector had equal image quality at less than half the radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates. The difference was even larger when compared with film with the flat-panel detector having equal image quality at approximately one-fifth the dose. The flat-panel detector has a very favourable combination of image quality vs radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates and screen film.     

Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The digital radiography system is based on a large-area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type. RESULTS: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.     

Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the image quality of a digital radiography system with an amorphous-silicon, large-area, digital flat-panel detector. METHODS: A flat-panel detector based on a matrix of amorphous silicon was integrated into a projection radiography system. The scintillator consisted of a layer of structured cesium iodide. The active matrix size of 30002 pixels together with a pixel size of 143 microm provided a large image area of 43 x 43 cm2. Basic image quality parameters such as detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were measured and compared with those obtained with conventional systems. RESULTS: The measurement of DQE yielded a high value of 70% at zero spatial frequency. At a system dose equivalent to 400 speed, the DQE of the digital system was a factor of two larger than the DQE of a storage phosphor or screen-film system within the entire spatial frequency range between zero and the Nyquist limit of 3.5 line pairs per millimeter. The flat-panel detector furthermore has an MTF that is superior to that in regular screen-film systems and also provides a substantially larger dynamic range. CONCLUSIONS: This new technology demonstrates its potential to provide equal or superior image quality to conventional screen-film systems and to reduce patient exposure to radiation dose. The advantages of digital radiography systems, based on a flat-panel detector as an instant image display, facilitation of work flow in the radiology department, and digital networking and archiving, are well in sight.     

Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images

OBJECTIVE. We compared the soft-copy images produced by a digital chest radiography system that uses a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous selenium with images produced by a storage phosphor radiography system for the visualization of anatomic regions of the chest. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two chest radiologists and two residents analyzed 46 pairs of posteroanterior chest radiographs on high-resolution video monitors (2560 x 2048 x 8 bits). In each pair, one radiograph was obtained with a storage phosphor radiography system, and the other radiograph was obtained with a selenium-based flat-panel detector radiography system. Each pair of radiographs was obtained at the same exposure settings. The interpreter rated the visibility and radiographic quality of 11 different anatomic regions. Each pair of images was ranked on a five-point scale (1 = prefer image A, 3 = no preference, 5 = prefer image B) for preference of technique. Statistical significance of preference was determined using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS. The interpreters had a statistically significant preference for the selenium-based radiography system in six (unobscured lung, hilum, rib, minor fissure, heart border, and overall appearance) of 11 anatomic regions (p<0.001) and for the storage phosphor system in two regions (proximal airway and thoracic spine) (p<0.05). Chest radiologists strongly preferred selenium-based images in eight regions, and they did not prefer storage phosphor images in any region. CONCLUSION. The soft-copy images produced by the selenium-based radiography system were perceived as equal or superior to those produced by the storage phosphor system in most but not all anatomic regions.     

Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations

In diagnostic radiology increasing attention has been focused on dose reduction while maintaining a clinically good image quality. With the use of digital detectors balancing dose vs image quality is done differently than in film-screen radiography, since dose and image brightness are uncoupled in digital imaging. In this study a new direct digital detector (flat-panel detector) was used in a dose-image optimisation of a simulated pelvic examination. X-ray images were taken with a direct digital detector (DDD), of the pelvic of a phantom using varying tube current (varying stochastic noise). The entrance surface dose was measured for each image. These images were scored by two radiologists according to EU guidelines. A dose comparison was made with an older PCR system (storage phosphor plates). With decreasing tube current the noise in the images increased and the image with the lowest dose and still acceptable image quality was identified. The results showed that the entrance surface dose using the DDD decreased from 1.4 mGy (PCR value) to 0.48 mGy (DDD standard settings). Through the optimisation the dose could be further decreased to 0.24 mGy while still maintaining an acceptable image quality. A substantial dose reduction was obtained with this new direct digital detector. This simple but efficient optimisation approach is easily applicable to other examinations and both DDD and storage phosphor plate detectors.     

Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital large-area silicon flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system in clinical chest imaging using abnormal findings documented by CT as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients (46 men and 34 women; age range,18-91 years; mean age, 63 years) who underwent CT of the chest were examined with the new digital radiography system, which is based on a 43 x 43 cm silicon flat-panel detector, and with a conventional screen-film system, which is used routinely in clinical practice. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. Four radiologists analyzed the digital and conventional images separately for chest abnormalities and rated the images using a five-level scale of confidence; CT was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves for each abnormality. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the digital and that of the conventional radiography method for almost all investigated criteria. The only exception was mediastinal abnormalities, for which the digital method provided better results than the conventional method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION. The diagnostic performance of the new large-area silicon flat-panel detector is equivalent or superior to that of the conventional screen-film system for clinical chest imaging and can replace conventional radiography systems. This new technology offers transmission and storage possibilities inherent to digital radiology that would facilitate daily practice and reduce the initial high costs in the long-term.     

Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration

PURPOSE: To compare image quality and estimated dose for chest radiographs obtained by using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector at fixed tube voltage and detector entrance dose with and without additional 0.3-mm copper filtration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. All prospectively enrolled patients signed the written consent form. Chest radiographs in two projections were acquired at 125-kVp tube voltage and 2.5-microGy detector entrance dose. The experimental group (38 patients) was imaged with 0.3-mm copper filtration; the control group (38 patients) was imaged without copper filtration. An additional 12 patients were imaged with and without copper filtration and served as paired subject-controls. Three readers blinded to group and clinical data independently evaluated the radiographs for image quality on a digital display system. Twelve variables (six for each radiographic projection) were assigned scores on a seven-point ordinal scale. Scores between experimental and control groups were compared: Logistic regression analysis and Mann-Whitney U test were used for unpaired patients; and Wilcoxon and McNemar test, for paired patients. In all, 72 comparisons were determined (36 [12 variables x three readers] for unpaired patients and 36 for paired patients). In a phantom study, radiation burden of experimental protocol was compared with that of control protocol by using Monte Carlo calculations. RESULTS: For 70 of 72 comparisons, digital radiographs obtained with copper filtration were of similar image quality as radiographs obtained without copper filtration (P = .123 to P > .99). For two of 72 comparisons, one observer judged the experimental protocol superior to the control protocol (P = .043, P = .046). Patient dose reduction estimated with Monte Carlo calculations was 31%. Use of copper filtration increased exposure times by 48% for posteroanterior views and by 34% for lateral views. CONCLUSION: Subjectively equivalent chest radiographic image quality was found with estimated 30% dose reduction after addition of 0.3-mm copper filtration with flat-panel cesium iodide-amorphous silicon technology.     

Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality of a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system in chest radiography, we conducted an observer preference study. A clinical comparative study was conducted of the flat-panel system versus the storage phosphor and standard film-screen systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine chest radiographs (posteroanterior) of 30 patients that were obtained using flat-panel, storage phosphor, and film screen systems were compared. The visibility of 10 anatomic regions and the overall image quality criteria were rated independently by three radiologists using a 5-point scale. The significance of the differences in diagnostic performance was tested with a Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Dose measurements for the three modalities were performed. RESULTS: The flat-panel radiography system showed an improved visibility in most anatomic structures when compared with a state-of-the-art conventional film-screen system and an equal visibility when compared with a storage phosphor system. The flat-panel system showed the greatest enhancement in the depiction of small detailed structures (p < 0.05) and achieved this with a reduction in overall radiation dose of more than 50%. CONCLUSION: The visibility of anatomic structures provided by this flat-panel detector system is as good as if not better than that provided by conventional or storage phosphor systems while emitting a reduced radiation dose.     

Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen

The aim of this clinical study was to compare the image quality of digital radiography using the new digital Bucky system based on a flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system for the skeletal structure and the abdomen. Fifty patients were examined using digital radiography with a flat-panel detector and screen-film systems, 25 for the skeletal structures and 25 for the abdomen. Six radiologists judged each paired image acquired under the same exposure parameters concerning three observation items for the bone and six items for the abdomen. Digital radiographic images for the bone were evaluated to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 42.2%, to be superior at 50.2%, and to be inferior at 7.6%. Digital radiographic images for the abdomen were judged to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 43.4%, superior at 52.4%, and inferior at 4.2%; thus, digital radiographic images were estimated to be either similar as or superior to screen-film images at over 92% for the bone and abdomen. On the statistical analysis, digital radiographic images were also judged to be preferred significantly in the most items for the bone and abdomen. In conclusion, the image quality of digital radiography with a flat-panel detector was superior to that of a screen-film system under the same exposure parameters, suggesting that dose reduction is possible with digital radiography.     

Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector (FPD) for digital chest radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 41 x 41-cm digital FPD is constructed on a single monolithic glass substrate with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Basic imaging characteristics of the FPD and associated image processing system were assessed on acquired images, including linearity, repeatability, uniformity of response, modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum, detective quantum efficiency (DQE), contrast sensitivity, and scatter content. Results with the FPD system were compared to those with a storage phosphor computed radiography (CR) system. RESULTS: Images obtained with the FPD demonstrated excellent uniformity, repeatability, and linearity, as well as MTF and DQE that were superior to those with the storage phosphor CR system. The contrast and scatter content of images acquired with the FPD were equivalent to those acquired with the storage phosphor system. CONCLUSION: The FPD provides radiographic images with excellent inherent physical image quality.     

Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

Computed radiography is a 2K x 2K x 10 bit digital radiographic system that replaces the film-screen combination with a photo-stimulable phosphor plate. The advantages of this relatively new technology include linear detector response, improved detector efficiency, and digital processing capabilities. Musculoskeletal applications benefit significantly from these attributes, which result clinically in the ability to reduce both radiation dose and number of exposures. Studies of observers' performance have shown no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between film-screen and computed radiographic musculoskeletal images. Computed radiography is particularly useful in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in traumatized patients with portable radiographs, spine radiographs, scoliosis studies, and depiction of soft-tissue abnormalities. Limitations include change in image format and size, high cost, decreased spatial resolution, restricted throughput, increased perception of noise, and new artifacts that must be recognized. Spatial resolution limitations of computed radiography in identification of fine detail information can be improved by using magnification techniques. Radiation dose reduction with an exposure decrease of 25-50% can be achieved without loss of diagnostic accuracy, although this depends on the examination and the abnormality. An interactive workstation is important in the use of a computed radiographic system with capabilities to adjust display parameters to best depict images and disease. We conclude that computed radiography is an alternative to film-screen radiography without significant differences in diagnostic quality in the evaluation of musculoskeletal images.     

Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of different detector radiation doses and peak kilovoltage settings on diagnostic performance and radiation dose at posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography performed with an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector (FPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All examinations were performed by using a digital FPD. PA chest radiographs of an anthropomorphic chest phantom were obtained with detector radiation doses of 2.50 microGy (system speed, 400), 1.56 microGy (speed, 640), and 1.25 microGy (speed, 800) and with peak kilovoltage values of 100, 120, and 140 kVp. Four types of simulated lesions-nodules of different sizes, polylobulated lesions, interstitial-nodular lesions, and interstitial-reticular lesions-were superimposed on the phantom. After four radiologists assessed all of the images, receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed. In addition, the entrance surface dose was measured and the effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: Reduced detector dose led to significantly decreased diagnostic performance in overall lesion detection (P <.05). However, over pulmonary areas only, this effect could not be seen. With use of the same kilovoltage values, reducing the detector dose, even to 1.25 microGy (speed, 800), did not lead to significantly decreased lesion detectability. In terms of diagnostic performance and effective dose, 120 kVp was the most effective. CONCLUSION: Standard PA chest radiographs should still be acquired at a detector dose of 2.50 microGy (speed, 400) with 120 kVp to yield the highest diagnostic performance. However, when the present analysis was focused on the lung fields only, no significant loss in diagnostic performance could be demonstrated, even after a 50% reduction in radiation dose.     

Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography

This was a radiologists' preference study to compare a digital chest radiography system that utilizes a large-area silicon flat-panel detector with conventional radiography for visualizing anatomic regions of the chest. Conventional and digital posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in 115 patients. The PA and lateral image pairs were compared independently by three radiologists rating the overall appearance, 11 anatomic regions in the PA, and 9 in the lateral views. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni-Holm adjustment (p=0.05). For the PA view, the digital system performed significantly better for the overall appearance and for all anatomic regions except for the peripheral pulmonary vasculature and hilum, where no significant difference was found. For the lateral digital images, the regions trachea, costodiaphragmatic recess, and hilum were rated significantly worse. The regions retrosternal and retrocardiac lung were rated significantly better. The other regions and the overall appearance showed no significant differences. The described digital chest radiography system showed statistically superior visualization of anatomic regions for PA and an ambiguous performance for lateral images as compared with conventional radiography. After changing some image processing parameters for the lateral view, this system may be suitable for digitalization of chest radiography.     

Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology

Implementation of flat-panel detectors and digital integration of the technique instead of the use of conventional radiographs leads to a shortening of the work process. With flat-panel technology the image production process is shortened by more than 30%. Major advantages in the implementation of integrated RIS, PACS and flat-panel detector system are increases in quality because most mistakes in picture labeling can be avoided, easier handling without the need for cassettes, and the possibility of image post-processing. The diagnostic quality of the images in the field of musculoskeletal radiology is, in comparison to conventional radiographs, at least adequate and in most cases markedly improved with a marked reduction in radiation exposure of around 30-50%. With respect to the numerous advantages of the digital techniques and especially flat-panel technology there is a very high likelihood that conventional radiographs will be substituted in the coming years, even though the cost of the new technology is currently significantly higher compared to conventional systems.     

Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of an active-matrix flat-panel x-ray detector for reduced-dose imaging of simulated arthritic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital x-ray detector based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon technology with a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, matrix of 3,000 x 3,000 pixels, pixel size of 143 micrometer, and digital output of 14 bits was used. State-of-the-art screen-film radiographs were compared with digital images obtained at doses equivalent to those obtained with system speeds of 400, 560, and 800. The phantom was composed of a human hand skeleton on an acrylic plate with drilled holes simulating bone erosions of different diameters and depths. Results of four independent observers were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector resulted in better diagnostic performance than did the screen-film combination, with the dose being the same for both modalities (P <.05). For digital images obtained at reduced doses, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The improved diagnostic performance with digital radiographs obtained with the cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector suggests that this detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction for specific diagnostic tasks, without loss of diagnostic accuracy.