Levobupivacaine: a new safer long acting local anaesthetic agent

The choice of local anaesthetic is influenced by several factors; it must provide effective anaesthesia and analgesia for the duration of the procedure and meet the expectations for post-operative pain management. Of primary concern is patient safety. Bupivacaine, currently the most widely used long acting local anaesthetic agent in both surgery and obstetrics, generally has a good safety record but its use has resulted in fatal cardiotoxicity, usually after accidental intravascular injection. Hence, for several years there has been a need for a long acting local anaesthetic, similar to bupivacaine, but with an improved cardiovascular safety profile. Levobupivacaine, the single enantiomer version of bupivacaine, offers a new long acting local anaesthetic, clinically equivalent in anaesthetic potency to bupivacaine, but with a reduced toxicity profile. Preclinical studies, from in vitro in single ion channels to whole large animal models, have unquestionably demonstrated that levobupivacaine is significantly less CNS toxic and cardiotoxic than bupivacaine. Cardiotoxicity is less easy to study in man, as the clinical signs are not usually seen until the CNS toxicity is marked, and well beyond that which is tolerable to volunteers or patients. Nevertheless, levobupivacaine has been shown to have less effect on myocardial contractility and QTc prolongation, early signs of cardiotoxicity, than bupivacaine in healthy subjects. In clinical use levobupivacaine has been shown to be equally efficacious as bupivacaine at comparable doses and concentrations, and has been found to produce similar anaesthetic characteristics (onset, duration and density of block). As levobupivacaine now becomes commercially available, the database available with which to make efficacy and safety comparisons with other local anaesthetics will increase, and the true value of this new long acting local anaesthetic should become even more apparent.     

Rapacuronium bromide: a review of its use in anaesthetic practice

Rapacuronium bromide (rapacuronium) is an aminosteroid, nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). At the recommended dose for endotracheal intubation (1.5 mg/kg), an intravenous bolus of rapacuronium has a rapid onset (approximately 1.2 to 1.8 minutes) and short duration of action (10.2 to 16.5 minutes) in adults undergoing elective surgery. Rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg produced clinically acceptable intubating conditions in 68 to 89% of these patients at about 1 minute after administration. The onset, extent and duration of action and clinical efficacy of an intubating dose of rapacuronium appeared to be similar in the general adult population, adult patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction, patients undergoing Caesarean section, and elderly, paediatric or obese adult patients. Onset time with rapacuronium 1.3 to 2.5 mg/kg (0.9 to 1.8 minutes) was similar to or slower than that with a 1 mg/kg dose of the depolarising NMBA suxamethonium chloride (0.8 to 1.2 minutes). Intubating conditions were clinically acceptable about I minute after administration in 86 to 100% of patients with rapacuronium 1.3 to 2.5 mg/kg compared with in 88 to 97% of patients with suxamethonium chloride 1 or 1.5 mg/kg. Spontaneous recovery was slower with rapacuronium than with suxamethonium chloride, but neostigmine 0.04 or 0.05 mg/kg administered 2 or 5 minutes after rapacuronium 1.3 or 1.5 mg/kg accelerated recovery. In the few available comparative clinical trials, rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg appeared to have a more rapid onset of action than the nondepolarising NMBAs mivacurium chloride 0.25 mg/kg, rocuronium bromide 0.45 or 0.6 mg/kg or vecuronium bromide 0.07 mg/kg, and a shorter duration of action than rocuronium bromide 0.45 or 0.6 mg/kg or vecuronium bromide 0.07 mg/kg. Additional boluses (< or =3) of rapacuronium 0.5 or 0.55 mg/kg after an intubating bolus of 1.5 mg/kg provided continued skeletal muscle relaxation during short surgical procedures in adult patients. However, these patients may recover more slowly than those who receive a single bolus of the drug. Bronchospasm was the most common treatment-related adverse event with rapacuronium 0.3 to 3 mg/kg (3.4% of adult patients). Tachycardia, injection site reaction and hypotension were also reported in small proportions of patients (1.6, 1.1 and 0.9%). The overall incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar with rapacuronium 1.5 or 2.5 mg/kg or suxamethonium chloride 1 mg/kg (8 vs. 6%) but bronchospasm, tachycardia and injection site reaction tended to occur more often with rapacuronium. Conclusions: At the recommended dose of 1.5 mg/kg, the nondepolarising NMBA rapacuronium has a rapid onset and short duration of action. It may provide a nondepolarising alternative to suxamethonium chloride for endotracheal intubation. Rapacuronium may be preferred over rocuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide or mivacurium chloride in this indication.     

Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Labetalol is an orally active adrenoceptor blocking drug which is a competitive antagonist at both alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor sites. Its beta-blocking effects resemble those of propranolol, but its overall haemodynamic effects are akin to those of a comination of propranolol and an alpha-adrenoceptor blocking drugs such as phenoxybenzamine. Unlike with conventional beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, acute administration of labetalol reduces peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure and has little effect on cardiac output. Theoretically, labetalol has advantages over beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs alone in the treatment of hypertension, but any real advantage, particulary in mild or moderate hypertension, has yet to be conclusively demonstrated in therapeutic trials. Labetalol may be particularly useful in some patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled by beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs alone or combined with a diuretic, but possibly at the expense of a postural hypotensive effect. Postural hypotension is the most troublesome side-effect, occasionally necessitating withdrawal of therapy, but severe side-effects such as are seen with effective antihypertensive dosages of phenoxybenzamine do not occur with labetalol.     

Tissue-type plasminogen activator. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use as a thrombolytic agent

Coronary arterial thrombolysis is becoming an established treatment of acute myocardial infarction. If given early enough, it recanalises occluded coronary arteries, salvages myocardial function and reduces mortality. A reduction of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction has now been demonstrated for streptokinase, anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC; anistreplase) and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). From the biochemical point of view, rt-PA has several attractive properties. It is similar to or identical with the physiological plasminogen activator in blood, it does not induce an antibody response, and it is more fibrin-specific than most or all other currently known thrombolytic agents. The rate of recanalisation of occluded coronary arteries with rt-PA is about 60 to 80% in non-comparative and placebo-controlled trials. rt-PA was similar in efficacy to urokinase in the only trial to compare the 2 agents. In 2 comparative trials evaluated by meta-analysis, rt-PA appeared more effective than streptokinase for the early recanalisation of occluded arteries. Both agents were comparable in their effects on left ventricular function in 2 comparative trials, but further study is needed to conclusively evaluate this parameter. Moreover, both agents reduce inhospital mortality, but much larger direct comparative trials are required before scientifically valid statements can be made on the relative clinical efficacy of available thrombolytic agents in terms of their effects on both morbidity and mortality. Thus, rt-PA constitutes a notable contribution of recombinant DNA technology to the treatment of thromboembolic disease, the main cause of death and disability in Western societies.     

Propofol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic

Propofol is an intravenous anaesthetic which is chemically unrelated to other anaesthetics. Induction of anaesthesia with propofol is rapid, and maintenance can be achieved by either continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injections, with either nitrous oxide or opioids used to provide analgesia. Comparative studies have shown propofol to be at least as effective as thiopentone, methohexitone or etomidate for anaesthesia during general surgery. The incidence of excitatory effects is lower with propofol than with methohexitone, but apnoea on induction occurs more frequently with propofol than with other anaesthetics. Additionally, a small number of studies of induction and maintenance of anaesthesia have found propofol to be a suitable alternative to induction with thiopentone and maintenance with halothane, isoflurane or enflurane. Propofol is particularly suitable for outpatient surgery since it provides superior operating conditions to methohexitone (particularly less movement), and rapid recovery in the postoperative period associated with a low incidence of nausea and vomiting. When used in combination with fentanyl or alfentanil, propofol is suitable for the provision of total intravenous anaesthesia, and comparative studies found it to be superior to methohexitone or etomidate in this setting. Infusions of subanaesthetic doses of propofol have been used to sedate patients for surgery under regional anaesthesia, and also to provide sedation of patients in intensive care. In the latter situation it is particularly encouraging that propofol did not suppress adrenal responsiveness during short term studies. If this is confirmed during longer term administration this would offer an important advantage over etomidate. Thus, propofol is clearly an effective addition to the limited range of intravenous anaesthetics. While certain areas of its use need further study, as would be expected at this stage of its development, propofol should find a useful role in anaesthetic practice.     

Iomeprol: a review of its use as a contrast medium

Iomeprol is a nonionic, monomeric iodinated contrast medium. Unlike the older ionic agents, iomeprol has low chemotoxicity, osmolality and viscosity and high water solubility. Compared with other nonionic contrast media, the osmolality and viscosity are lower and the water solubility is reported to be higher with iomeprol. Most radiographs (about 67 to 100%) obtained with iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) were of good or excellent quality in noncomparative and comparative trials recruiting 40 to 6127 patients undergoing various radiographic procedures. As expected, the diagnostic efficacy of iomeprol did not differ significantly from that of other nonionic agents (iopamidol, iopromide, iohexol and iotrolan). Iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) was well tolerated in clinical trials. Most adverse events were transient and of mild to moderate intensity and were similar to those observed with other contrast media. The overall incidence of adverse events ranged from 3 to 49.7% and mainly included localised pain (< or =6%) and heat sensations (8 to 45%), taste disturbances (3 to 27%) and various pseudoallergic reactions (< or =20% for each type of event). The incidence of heat or pain and taste disturbances with iomeprol was similar to that observed with iopromide and iopamidol. Pain (but not heat sensations) was reported significantly less frequently and taste disturbances reported significantly more frequently with iomeprol than with iohexol in a comparative trial. Pseudoallergic reactions (such as nausea, vomiting, skin reactions, dizziness, headache) were significantly less common with iomeprol than with ioxaglate and occurred at a similar frequency to that with iopromide and iopamidol. Cardiovascular events were rarely observed with iomeprol. Currently available iomeprol solutions contain a range of iodine concentrations (150 to 400 mg/ml) and are approved for a wide variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol solutions are chemically stable which negates the need for chelating agents. Formulations of this agent are therefore the first not to contain edetic acid (EDTA). CONCLUSIONS: Iomeprol shows equivalent diagnostic efficacy, and a similar adverse event profile, to that of other nonionic contrast media. The availability of a range of iodine concentrations enables iomeprol to be used in a variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol, like others in its class, is suitable for use in diagnostic imaging.     

Acitretin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Acitretin (etretin), a second generation monoaromatic retinoid for use in the treatment of severe psoriasis and other dermatoses, is the major active metabolite of etretinate and possesses a similar therapeutic index; i.e. a similar ratio of clinical efficacy to adverse effects. When used alone at a maintenance dosage of 30 to 50mg daily, acitretin is effective in the treatment of psoriasis, causing a reduction in the severity of scaling, erythema and induration. Efficacy appears to be further enhanced by combination with psoralen-ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA) or ultraviolet B irradiation (UVB). These combinations reduce the time to lesion clearance and reduce the total radiation dose, improving overall safety. Comparative studies have confirmed the equivalence of acitretin and etrtinate with regard to efficacy and toxicity. Adverse reactions are dose-related and generally typical of hypervitaminosis A. Alopecia and mucocutaneous symptoms such as cheilitis and drying of the mucous membranes are particularly prevalent. Hypertriglyceridaemia and elevation of cholesterol levels also occur. Examination of the pharmacokinetic profile of acitretin reveals its main advantage over etretinate. Acitretin is less lipophilic than etretinate, and its lack of sequestration into 'deep' fatty storage sites is reflected in a comparatively short terminal elimination half-life of 50 to 60 hours, compared with 120 days for etretinate. Due to its teratogenic potential, acitretin is strictly contraindicated in women of childbearing potential unless effective contraceptive measures are employed. Etretinate has been identified in plasma samples of some patients treated with acitretin. Thus, acetretin has an established place in the treatment of keratinising disorders, although its use in women of child-bearing potential must be accompanied by effective contraceptive measures, with a further 2-year contraceptive period after therapy completion.     

Muromonab CD-3: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use in transplantation

Muromonab CD-3 (OKT-3) is a monoclonal antibody that is highly effective in the treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplants. Due to its monoclonal nature, each molecule is identical because it is derived from a single antibody-producing clone. OKT-3 is administered only by intravenous injection and has a harmonic half-life of approximately 18 hours. It binds specifically to the CD-3 complex, which is involved in antigen recognition and cell stimulation, on the surface of T lymphocytes. Immediately after administration CD-3-positive T lymphocytes are abruptly removed from the circulation. The route of metabolism for OKT-3 is not clear; it may be removed by opsonization by the reticuloendothelial system when bound to T lymphocytes, or by human antimurine antibody production. The agent has been effective in reversing corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection in renal, liver, and cardiac transplant recipients. Its use in pancreatic and bone marrow recipients is inconclusive. OKT-3 has a considerable number of initial side effects, and some life-threatening reactions may occur. This drug should not be administered to any patient who is greater than 3% usual body weight because of the potential for the development of severe pulmonary edema. OKT-3 may also be associated with a high rate of infection, especially of the viral type. The usual dose is 5 mg administered as an intravenous bolus over 2-4 minutes daily for 10-14 days. Approximately 85% of patients treated with OKT-3 develop reactive human antimurine antibodies that, over time, may lead to tachyphylaxis and neutralization of the murine antibody OKT-3. OKT-3 is potent immunosuppressive agent and is an important prototype of future monoclonal antibodies.     

Ranitidine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Ranitidine is a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist which, unlike cimetidine, does not contain an imidazole group. On a weight basis, ranitidine is 4 to 10 times more potent than cimetidine in inhibiting stimulated gastric acid secretion in humans. Therapeutic trials comparing ranitidine and cimetidine have demonstrated that ranitidine 150 mg twice daily is an effective alternative to cimetidine 1000 mg daily in 4 divided doses in increasing the rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers over a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Ranitidine, given as a single 150 mg dose at night, decreases the incidence of ulcer recurrence. Preliminary studies in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in patients intolerant of, or unresponsive to cimetidine, indicate that ranitidine controls the gastric hyperacidity and heals most ulcers, including those which failed to respond to months of treatment with cimetidine 1 to 1.6 g daily. Ranitidine, unlike cimetidine, has no antiandrogenic effects and does not alter hepatic metabolism of drugs. Ranitidine is well tolerated. Preliminary reports of the resolution of cimetidine-induced adverse effects following substitution of ranitidine, suggest that ranitidine may be of value in patients intolerant of cimetidine. However, wider clinical experience with ranitidine is needed to determine the clinical relevance of these reports.     

Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease

Tinzaparin sodium (tinzaparin; innohep) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) formed by the enzymatic degradation of porcine unfractionated heparin (UFH).In clinical trials, once-daily subcutaneous (SC) tinzaparin was effective and generally well tolerated in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease. SC tinzaparin 75 anti-Xa IU/kg/day showed similar thromboprophylactic efficacy to adjusted-dosage oral warfarin in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty; in patients undergoing knee replacement, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was significantly lower with tinzaparin. The drug had similar efficacy to equivalent-dosage SC enoxaparin sodium in orthopaedic surgery. In patients undergoing general surgery, SC tinzaparin 3500 anti-Xa IU/day was of equivalent thromboprophylactic efficacy to SC UFH 5000IU twice daily. Encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with tinzaparin in the prevention of DVT in patients with complete motor paralysis. In the initial treatment of acute proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism, SC tinzaparin 175 anti-Xa IU/kg/day was at least as effective as adjusted-dosage intravenous (IV) UFH. In the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism, tinzaparin has demonstrated similar efficacy to dalteparin sodium (dalteparin) and warfarin. Tinzaparin was effective in preventing clotting in haemodialysis circuits; the anticoagulant efficacy of tinzaparin in patients undergoing haemodialysis was similar to that of SC dalteparin and similar to or less than (although in this case the tinzaparin dose was too low for sufficient anticoagulant efficacy) that of IV UFH. Advantages of tinzaparin over UFH and warfarin include ease of administration and lack of need for laboratory monitoring. Tinzaparin is more cost effective than UFH in the treatment of established thromboembolic disease, and home-based treatment with tinzaparin may offer greater cost benefits than hospital-based therapy. Tinzaparin is well tolerated, including in elderly patients and those with renal impairment receiving long-term treatment. Incidences of major bleeding complications were low and reports of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were infrequent in clinical studies. In conclusion, tinzaparin is a valuable LMWH in the prophylaxis and management of thromboembolic disease.     

Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser

Oral sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, Casen-Fleet Fosfosoda is a low-volume, hyperosmotic agent used as part of a colorectal-cleansing preparation for surgery, x-ray or endoscopic examination. The efficacy and tolerability of oral sodium phosphate solution was generally similar to, or significantly better than, that of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or other colorectal cleansing regimens in patients preparing for colonoscopy, colorectal surgery or other colorectal-related procedures. Generally, oral sodium phosphate solution was significantly more acceptable to patients than PEG or other regimens. The use of this solution should be considered in most patients (with the exception of those with contraindications) requiring colorectal cleansing. PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES: After the first and second 45 mL dose of oral sodium phosphate solution, the mean time to onset of bowel activity was 1.7 and 0.7 hours and the mean duration of activity was 4.6 and 2.9 hours. Bowel activity ceased within 4 hours of administration of the second dose in 83% of patients. Elevations in serum phosphorus and falls in serum total and ionised calcium from baseline occurred during the 24 hours after administration of oral sodium phosphate solution in seven healthy volunteers. These changes were not associated with significant changes in clinical assessments. The decrease in serum potassium levels after administration of oral sodium phosphate solution was negatively correlated with baseline intracellular potassium levels. THERAPEUTIC USE: A regimen that administered the first dose of sodium phosphate on the previous evening and a second dose on the morning of the procedure (10-12 hours apart) was significantly more effective than PEG-based regimens for colorectal cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or colorectal surgery. A regimen that administered both doses of oral sodium phosphate on the day prior to the procedure offered no colorectal cleansing advantage over PEG-based regimens and was significantly less effective than an oral sodium phosphate solution regimen that administered one dose on the previous evening and a second dose on the morning of the procedure. Oral sodium phosphate solution was generally as effective as other colorectal cleansing solutions (including magnesium citrate-containing regimens with sodium picosulfate). The direct costs of a diagnostic colonic examination with oral sodium phosphate solution were less than those with PEG (US465 dollars vs US503 dollars per patient; 1995 values), according to data from a US study. Oral sodium phosphate solution was significantly more effective than a commercially available tablet formulation as a colorectal cleanser prior to colonoscopy (data from one study only). TOLERABILITY: Oral sodium phosphate solution administered as two 45 mL doses (generally 10-12 hours apart) was well tolerated in well designed trials in which adults with major comorbid conditions were excluded. Sodium phosphate-associated adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal (including abdominal pain/cramping, abdominal fullness and/or bloating, anal or perianal irritation or soreness, nausea, vomiting or hunger pains), although dizziness, weakness/fatigue, thirst, chest pain, chills, headache and sleep loss were also reported. Faecal incontinence was commonly reported in the elderly. Three doses (administered 10 minutes apart) of 15 mL of oral sodium phosphate solution, each diluted in 250 mL of clear fluid was associated with less vomiting than one 45 mL dose of the solution diluted in 250 mL of clear fluid (data from one study). In patients without major comorbid conditions, oral sodium phosphate has been associated with transient and clinically inconsequential changes in intravascular volume and electrolyte disturbances. Serious electrolyte disturbances have been associated with oral sodium phosphate administration in patients in whom sodium phosphate is contraindicated or should be use with caution (the elderly and those with bowel obstructions, small intestinal disorders, poor gut motilderly and those with bowel obstructions, small intestinal disorders, poor gut motility, renal insufficiency, cardiovascular disease or taking concomitant medication) or in patients ingesting more than the recommended dosage. Changes in the colonic mucosa have been reported in patients treated with oral sodium phosphate solution; however, the exact role of this agent in the appearance of these changes has not been fully clarified. The tolerability profile of oral sodium phosphate solution was similar to, or significantly better than, that of PEG or other colorectal cleansing regimens. Oral sodium phosphate solution was generally significantly more acceptable than PEG or other colorectal cleansing regimens. Oral sodium phosphate solution had similar tolerability, but was considered to be more acceptable than commercially available oral sodium phosphate tablets prior to colonoscopy (data from one study).     

Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use.

Antacids are commonly used self-prescribed medications. They consist of calcium carbonate and magnesium and aluminum salts in various compounds or combinations. The effect of antacids on the stomach is due to partial neutralisation of gastric hydrochloric acid and inhibition of the proteolytic enzyme, pepsin. Each cation salt has its own pharmacological characteristics that are important for determination of which product can be used for certain indications. Antacids have been used for duodenal and gastric ulcers, stress gastritis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, pancreatic insufficiency, non-ulcer dyspepsia, bile acid mediated diarrhoea, biliary reflux, constipation, osteoporosis, urinary alkalinisation and chronic renal failure as a dietary phosphate binder. The development of histamine H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors has significantly reduced usage for duodenal and gastric ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, antacids can still be useful for stress gastritis and non-ulcer dyspepsia. The recent release of proprietary H2 antagonists has likely further reduced antacid use for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Other indications are still valid but represent minor uses. Antacid drug interactions are well noted, but can be avoided by rescheduling medication administration times. This can be inconvenient and discourage compliance with other medications. All antacids can produce drug interactions by changing gastric pH, thus altering drug dissolution of dosage forms, reduction of gastric acid hydrolysis of drugs, or alter drug elimination by changing urinary pH. Most antacids, except sodium bicarbonate, may decrease drug absorption by adsorption or chelation of other drugs. Most adverse effects from antacids are minor with periodic use of small amounts. However, when large doses are taken for long periods of time, significant adverse effects may occur especially patients with underlying diseases such as chronic renal failure. These adverse effects can be reduced by monitoring of electrolyte status and avoiding aluminum-containing antacids to bind dietary phosphate in chronic renal failure. Antacids, although effective for discussed indications of duodenal and gastric ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, have been replaced by newer, more effective agents that are more palatable to patients. Antacids are likely to continue to be used for non-ulcer dyspepsia, minor episodes of heartburn (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease) and other clear indications. Although their wide-spread use may decline, these drugs will still be used, and clinicians should be aware of their potential drug interactions and adverse effects.     

Leuprorelin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in prostatic disorders.

Leuprorelin (leuprolide acetate) is a synthetic analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)] which initially stimulates luteinising hormone (LH) and hence testicular androgen release; continuous administration then results in profound suppression of these hormones. Testosterone levels associated with castration are attained within 3 to 4 weeks. A biodegradable subcutaneous or intramuscular depot formulation of leuprorelin 3.75 or 7.5 mg, which releases the drug at a constant rate over 28 days, is available and may be preferred over daily subcutaneous injections. The progression of previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer is delayed in 70 to 90% of men receiving leuprorelin, with median survival of approximately 2 years. The efficacy of leuprorelin is equivalent to that of estrogen therapy, but the tolerability of the GnRH analogue is far better. In contrast to most other studies of GnRH agonists, a slight survival advantage has been reported for combined treatment with leuprorelin and the antiandrogen flutamide. Small noncomparative trials reveal that leuprorelin also causes regression of benign hyperplastic prostate tissue with corresponding relief of obstructive, but not irritative, symptoms although continuous treatment is necessary to maintain remission. Impotence and flushing occur in most leuprorelin recipients but, unlike diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol), cardiovascular toxicity and gynaecomastia are not significant problems. Symptom flare, usually manifested as bone pain in prostate cancer patients and exacerbation of obstructive symptoms in those with benign prostatic hypertrophy, can occur in 4 to 29% at the beginning of treatment. Leuprorelin treatment is therefore an established effective palliative measure in men with previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer, and may have a role in those with benign hypertrophy who are unfit for surgery.     

Ticlopidine. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in platelet-dependent disorders

Ticlopidine inhibits platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and most other platelet agonists in ex vivo studies of human platelets. The drug also improves other abnormalities of platelet function seen in patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, ischaemic heart disease or other conditions involving platelet hyperaggregation. Abnormal platelet activity has been implicated in a variety of clinical conditions in which patients are at high risk of thromboembolic events, and thus the effectiveness of ticlopidine has been investigated in such patients. Since the initial review of the drug appeared in the Journal, data from several large multicentre studies have shown that ticlopidine has a substantial benefit to offer patients who have experienced transient ischaemic attacks or stroke, and in those with peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease. Ticlopidine reduces the incidence of further stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death, and is superior to placebo and aspirin in this regard in studies of patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attacks, or intermittent claudication. Ticlopidine is equally effective in both men and women and also improves symptoms of claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease, and appears to reduce anginal pain. Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and sickle cell disease have shown some improvement with ticlopidine administration. The drug reduces thromboembolic events and re-stenosis in patients undergoing haemodialysis and cardiac surgery, and appears to prevent the progression of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ticlopidine in large clinical trials is associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo and an overall incidence similar to aspirin. Most adverse effects do not require withdrawal of treatment. Gastrointestinal symptoms (particularly diarrhoea) are most common, occurring almost twice as frequently with ticlopidine as with aspirin. Other adverse effects associated with ticlopidine include skin rash, haemorrhagic disorders, and haematological effects; these latter effects require careful monitoring of patients during the initial weeks of therapy. In conclusion, ticlopidine is a valuable addition to the prophylactic treatments available for the management of patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease, who present a high risk of thromboembolic events. Although tolerability may be a problem for some patients, the overall benefit conferred by the drug would appear to outweigh this potential disadvantage. Because of its antiplatelet activity, ticlopidine has a promising role in other disorders mediated by platelet dysfunction. However, the precise role of the drug in these additional therapeutic indications awaits clarification with wider clinical experience.     

Transdermal nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate). A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use

Nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate) has been used for many years via the sublingual route for treating acute anginal attacks. In recent years transdermal delivery of nitroglycerin has gained popularity for prophylaxis against angina. However, nitrate tolerance appears to be a therapeutic problem with all long-acting nitrates regardless of delivery mechanism, and it occurs in most patients with stable angina treated with continuous 24-hour application of nitroglycerin patches. Since continuous 24-hour plasma concentrations of nitroglycerin do not appear to be desirable, alternative approaches to therapy are needed. A simple method to minimise tolerance with transdermal nitroglycerin patches is to remove the patch at bedtime and reapply a new patch in the morning. Such intermittent therapy allows a patch-free period during the night, when most patients experience few angina attacks, but optimises nitrate sensitivity during the daytime. However, the place of intermittent nitroglycerin patch therapy in the treatment of stable angina needs clarification with further study, particularly comparisons with other long-acting forms of nitrates. There are insufficient data to recommend the use of transdermal nitroglycerin patches in the treatment of patients with unstable angina or congestive heart failure. In conclusion, transdermal nitroglycerin patches offer a convenient and cosmetically acceptable dosage form which has potential use in stable angina if administered as an intermittent regimen providing a patch-free period each night.     

Basiliximab: a review of its use as induction therapy in renal transplantation

Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric (human/murine) monoclonal antibody, is indicated for the prevention of acute organ rejection in adult and paediatric renal transplant recipients in combination with other immunosuppressive agents.Basiliximab significantly reduced acute rejection compared with placebo in renal transplant recipients receiving dual- (cyclosporin microemulsion and corticosteroids) or triple-immunotherapy (azathioprine- or mycophenolate mofetil-based); graft and patient survival rates at 12 months were similar. Significantly more basiliximab than placebo recipients were free from the combined endpoint of death, graft loss or acute rejection 3 years, but not 5 years, after transplantation.The incidence of adverse events was similar in basiliximab and placebo recipients, with no increase in the incidence of infection, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Malignancies or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after treatment with basiliximab were rare, with a similar incidence to that seen with placebo at 12 months or 5 years post-transplantation. Rare cases of hypersensitivity reactions to basiliximab have been reported.The efficacy of basiliximab was similar to that of equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and daclizumab, and similar to or greater than that of muromonab CD3. Basiliximab was as effective as rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) in patients at relatively low risk of acute rejection, but less effective in high-risk patients. Numerically or significantly fewer patients receiving basiliximab experienced adverse events considered to be related to the study drug than ATG or RATG recipients. The incidence of infection, including CMV infection, was similar with basiliximab and ATG or RATG.Basiliximab plus baseline immunosuppression resulted in no significant differences in acute rejection rates compared with baseline immunosuppression with or without ATG or antilymphocyte globulin in retrospective analyses conducted for small numbers of paediatric patients. Limited data from paediatric renal transplant recipients suggest a similar tolerability profile to that in adults. Basiliximab appears to allow the withdrawal of corticosteroids or the use of corticosteroid-free or calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in renal transplant recipients.Basiliximab did not increase the overall costs of therapy in pharmacoeconomic studies.CONCLUSION: Basiliximab reduces acute rejection without increasing the incidence of adverse events, including infection and malignancy, in renal transplant recipients when combined with standard dual- or triple-immunotherapy. The overall incidence of death, graft loss or acute rejection was significantly reduced at 3 years; there was no significant difference for this endpoint 5 years after transplantation. Malignancy was not increased at 5 years. The overall efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration and cost effectiveness of basiliximab make it an attractive option for the prophylaxis of acute renal transplant rejection.     

Genus Bupleurum: a review of its phytochemistry, pharmacology and modes of action

Objectives Radix Bupleuri represents one of the most successful and widely used herbal drugs in Asia for treatment of many diseases over the past 2000 years. Thorough studies have been carried out on many species of this genus and have generated immense data about the chemical composition and corresponding biological activity of extracts and isolated secondary metabolites. In this work, we review the chemistry and pharmacology of the genus Bupleurum and explore the relationships between the pharmacological effects and the chemical composition of these drugs. Key findings Early studies on the genus Bupleurum had focused only on the traditional uses of the plants in the treatment of inflammatory disorders and infectious diseases. After chemical profiling, several groups of secondary metabolites were characterized with relevant biological activity: triterpene saponins (saikosaponins), lignans, essential oils and polysaccharides. As a result, present interest is now focused on the bioactivity of the isolated triterpene saponins acting as immunomodulatory, anti‐inflammatory and antiviral agents, as well as on the observed ant‐iulcer activity of the polysaccharides and anti‐proliferative activity of different lignans. Many saikosaponins exhibited very potent anti‐inflammatory, hepatoprotective and immunomodulatory activities both in vivo and in vitro. Conclusions Further investigations and screenings are required to explore other Bupleurum species, to evaluate the clinical safety and possible interactions with other drugs or herbs. Standardization of Bupleuri extracts is crucial for them being integrated into conventional medicine due to large chemical and biological variations between different species and varieties.