Anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether advancing age affects the outcome of anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Anal sphincter repair was performed on 24 patients younger than 40 (median age, 30) years and on 14 patients older than 40 (median age, 57) years. All patients had previous obstetric trauma. RESULTS: Twenty patients younger than 40 years (83 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 63–95 percent) became continent, or incontinent to flatus only, after anal sphincter repair, whereas four patients had unchanged incontinence. Among patients older than 40 years, six patients (43 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 18–71 percent) became continent, whereas eight patients remained incontinent (40 percent difference in functional outcome between younger and older patients; 95 percent confidence interval, 10–70 percent). CONCLUSION: Older females have a poorer outcome of anal sphincter repair for obstetric trauma compared with younger females.     

Puborectalis and external anal sphincter paralysis with preservation of fecal continence

A case of poliomyelitis-induced paralysis of the puborectalis and external anal sphincter is described. This demonstrates the effect of an exclusively motor deficit of striated muscles controlling fecal continence. The patient has remained continent of feces for 37 years.     

Previous sphincter repair does not affect the outcome of repeat repair

PURPOSE: As many as 60 percent of patients present with recurrent symptoms of fecal incontinence after anterior overlapping anal sphincter repair. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of repeat overlapping anal sphincter repair. METHODS: All female patients with obstetric sphincter damage who underwent anterior overlapping sphincter repair between November 1988 and June 2000 were reviewed. All patients were preoperatively assessed by anorectal manometry, electromyography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency; manometry was repeated during follow-up. Preoperative endoanal ultrasonography was available only after 1990. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients were available for analysis, 115 without previous surgery and 36 after at least one previous sphincter repair. The median follow-up was 13 (range, 1–64) months and 20 (range, 2–96) months, respectively. The median incontinence score improved from 18 to 5 (P < 0.0001) in patients without previous repair and from 17.5 to 7 (P < 0.0001) in patients after previous repair. In the former group, the outcome was good in 67 (58 percent) patients, adequate in 19 (16.5 percent), and poor in 29 (25.5 percent). In the group with previous sphincter repair, the outcome was good in 18 patients (50 percent), adequate in 4 (11 percent), and poor in 14 (39 percent; P = 0.2646). The mean resting pressure increased from 20 (range, 3–43) mmHg to 24 (range, 10–44) mmHg and from 27 (range, 4–56) mmHg to 32 (range, 16–45) mmHg, respectively. The mean squeeze pressure increased from 60 (range, 23–63) mmHg to 67 (range, 33–114) mmHg and from 54 (range, 25–90) mmHg to 70 (range, 34–95) mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSION: Previous sphincter repair does not affect clinical outcome. Repeat anterior overlapping sphincter repair yields a significant improvement in the continence score and should be considered as the treatment of choice in patients with fecal incontinence who have had previous sphincter repair and residual anterior sphincter damage.     

Standards for anal sphincter replacement

PURPOSE: Anal sphincter replacement offers a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence or for those who require abdominoperineal resection for localized malignancy. The purpose of this study was to review the current status of anal sphincter replacement, formulate a consensus statement regarding its current use, and outline suggestions for future development. METHODS: Four areas of interests were selected: indications for sphincter replacement, continence scoring and quality of life, choice of therapy, and dissemination of new technology. A questionnaire regarding these issues was developed and circulated to working party members; its results served as the basis for this consensus document. RESULTS: Both electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter are options for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter is also appropriate for reconstruction after surgical excision of the anorectum in selected cases. Avoidance of complications requires strict attention to sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, and deep venous thrombus prophylaxis. A standardized scoring system is proposed that evaluates both continence and evacuation. Quality of life is a critical endpoint for assessing sphincter replacement, and use of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons incontinence-specific quality-of-life instrument is recommended. As the efficacy of sphincter replacement becomes proven, dissemination of the technique should occur in a controlled manner to ensure adequate surgeon training, minimization of complications, and optimization of results. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter replacement by electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter provide a continent option for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence and those requiring abdominoperineal resection. The guidelines offered in this document are intended to facilitate the controlled and safe development and acceptance of these new techniques.See ACKNOWLEDGMENTS section for author affiliations.Presented at the meeting of the World Congress of Gastroenterology, Vienna, Austria, September 5 to 12, 1998.     

Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence from single anal sphincter defects are surgically remedial and commonly the result of obstetric injuries. Overlapping anal sphincter repair has previously been associated in small series with good results in 69 to 97 percent of patients. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the results of overlapping anal sphincter repair in one institution and to assess the effects of age, presence of a neuropathy, and addition of a temporary colostomy on the success of surgery. METHODS: A study of 57 overlapping anal sphincter repairs in 56 (54 females) patients at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital during a six-year period was performed. All patients were investigated preoperatively with endoanal ultrasound and concentric needle electromyography. Patients have been assessed prospectively since 1994 with a questionnaire, including a four-point Likert scale of continence level, the St. Mark's incontinence scoring system (range, 0–13), the Pescatori incontinence scoring system (range, 0–6), and patient assessment of success or failure of the overlapping anal sphincter repair. A colostomy was selectively formed in conjunction with an overlapping anal sphincter repair in 21 patients (8 preoperatively, 13 simultaneously), and 18 patients had a concomitant neuropathy (3 unilateral, 15 bilateral). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 18 months, median continence scores overall had improved from St. Mark's incontinence scoring 13 to 3 (P<0.0001) and Pescatori incontinence scoring 6 to 2 (P<0.0001). Forty-nine of 57 (86 percent) repairs have been successful, and 8 are considered to be failures. Twenty-one of 27 (78 percent) repairs in patients younger than 40 years of age were successful, as were 28 of 30 (93 percent) repairs in patients older than 40 years of age (P=0.10). Four of 18 (22 percent) repairs associated with a neuropathy failed compared with 4 of 39 (10 percent) without a neuropathy (P=0.21). Improved or normal continence was achieved in 17 of 21 (81 percent) patients with a stoma and overlapping anal sphincter repair and in 32 of 36 (89 percent) patients with an overlapping anal sphincter repair alone (P=0.32). The presence of a stoma did not improve the rate of wound healing by primary intention (62 percent for stomavs. 64 percent for overlapping anal sphincter repair alone;P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Single anal sphincter defects can be successfully treated with an overlapping anal sphincter repair. There is no improvement in primary healing with selective stoma formation. Age of the patient and presence of a neuropathy should not detract from proceeding with overlapping anal sphincter repair when singular anal sphincter defects are detected on endoanal ultrasound in muscle that is still active.Presented in part at the Annual Scientific Congress of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Australia, May 6 to 10, 1996.     

Preliminary experience in management of fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter injury

PURPOSE: Isolated injuries of the internal anal sphincter can cause fecal incontinence. With the advent of ultrasound, which accurately delineates the anatomy of the anal sphincters, internal sphincter injuries can be diagnosed more precisely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of direct repair of isolated internal anal sphincter defects. METHODS: Eight patients (6 males; median age, 37 years) with clinically and sonographically proved internal anal sphincter defects were the subject of this study. Patients had different degrees of incontinence that failed to respond to medical treatment. All patients had their sphincters repaired by direct apposition using coated Vicryl® 2-0 stitches. A strict postoperative regime that avoided stretch of the sphincter for one month was adopted. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 15 months, continence improved in all patients, and two achieved full continence. None of the patients wore pads. Mean continence score improved significantly from 4 to 12 and 11 at 6 and 12 postoperative months, respectively (P<0.0001, pairedt-test). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of patients and the short follow-up, the preliminary results of repair of isolated internal sphincter defects are satisfactory.     

Internal anal sphincter

The internal anal sphincter, the smooth muscle component of the anal sphincter complex, has an ambiguous role in maintaining anal continence. Despite its significant contribution to resting anal canal pressures, even total division of the internal anal sphincter in surgery for anal fistulas may fail to compromise continence in otherwise healthy subjects. However, recently reported abnormalities of the innervation and reflex response of the internal anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence indicate its significance in maintaining continence. The advent of sphincter-saving surgery and restorative proctocolectomy has re-emphasized the major contribution of the internal anal sphincter to resting pressure and its significance in preventing fecal leakage. The variable effect of rectal excision on rectoanal inhibitory reflex has led to a reappraisal of the significance of this reflex in discrimination of rectal contents and its impact on anal continence. Electromyographic, manometric, and ultrasonographic evaluation of the internal anal sphincter has provided new insights into its pathophysiology. This article reviews advances in our understanding of internal anal sphincter physiology in health and disease.     

Experimental internal anal sphincter replacement with demucosated colonic plication

Background: Selective re-creation of a new internal anal sphincter could be indicated when the natural one is irreversibly damaged or excised. Methods: In this preliminary experimental work, surgical techniques of internal anal sphincter replacement in pigs were investigated. After preoperative anorectal manometry, surgical procedure was done in two phases: abdominal, mobilization of the colon-rectum to the pelvic floor; and perianal, dissection of the anal canal from the external anal sphincter through the intersphincteric space. The fully mobilized anorectal segment, including the internal anal sphincter, was pulled down through the anus and resected. The distal colonic stump was then demucosated and two types of plications of the demucosated segment were accomplished, each type in three animals. The plicated segment was then returned into the anal canal, inside the external sphincter. Short-term follow-up with clinical and manometric evaluations was performed and, subsequently, histological analysis of the plicated segment, after the animals were sacrificied. Results: None of the animals became incontinent. Anal manometry identified a high-pressure zone and relaxation reflex in the new anal canal. Histologic studies showed hypertrophy of smooth muscle layers without degenerative changes. Conclusion: This study indicates that a plication of colonic smooth muscle wall can re-create a high-pressure zone in the anal canal after the internal anal sphincter has been excised. Received: 4 May 2002 / Accepted: 22 August 2002 Correspondence to M. Lorenzi     

Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection

PURPOSE: Transanal stapled anastomosis has been associated with continence disturbances and reduced postoperative anal sphincter function. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of transanal stapling on anal sphincter morphology by endoanal ultrasound. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients undergoing stapled low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma were assessed. Each patient was assessed by endoluminal ultrasound before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were no preoperative internal and sphincter defects observed. Three female patients were observed to have preoperative evidence of external anal sphincter defects. After low anterior resection, seven patients were found to have internal anal sphincter defects, which persisted after the two-year follow-up. There were no additional external anal sphincter injuries. Three patients with internal anal sphincter injuries required the use of pads for poor bowel function. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 18 percent of patients who underwent stapled low anterior resection had long-term evidence of internal anal sphincter injury. The external sphincter does not appear to be affected by the procedure.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Postoperative anal canal length predicts outcome in patients having sphincter repair for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: Controversy exists in regard to the prognostic value of clinical data and physiological tests in patients undergoing sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1996, 405 consecutive patients had a sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Preoperative and postoperative manometric data were available on 51 of these patients, and these patients' charts were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative continence was scored using the four-level scale of Browning and Parks. Mean follow-up was 16.2 (median, 6; range, 1–96) months. Mean age was 41 (median, 36; range, 21–80) years, and 46 (90 percent) patients were female. RESULTS: Twenty-three (45 percent) patients had perfect continence postoperatively, whereas 41 (80 percent) patients demonstrated improvement in continence score after sphincter repair. Using univariate analysis, various clinical and anal physiologic data were analyzed for an association with postoperative continence score. Postoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative anal canal length were both significantly related to postoperative continence (r _s ^B for Spearman correlation coefficient to differentiate from r for the Pearson coefficient. =0.442;P=0.0012; andr _s=0.440;P=0.0012, respectively), whereas postoperative mean squeeze pressure was not (r _s=0.273;P=0.0529). Postoperative mean resting pressure and anal canal length were entered into a logistic regression model. Postoperative mean resting pressure was not significant (P=0.6643), and when it was dropped from the model, postoperative anal canal length was highly significant (estimated odds ratio, 3.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1–9.3;P=0.0047) in predicting postoperative continence. CONCLUSIONS: No preoperative data predicted functional outcome, and in contrast to other studies, postoperative anal canal length provides the best prediction of postoperative continence.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.     

Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair

PURPOSE: Delayed repair of obstetric-related anal sphincter injury remains problematic, and perineal wound breakdown is common. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome after overlap anal sphincter repair and to determine the advantages, if any, of a posterior fourchette incision (n=18) compared with a conventional perineal incision (n=32). METHODS: Fifty females of mean parity 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.6) underwent repair in a five-year period. The mean follow-up was 23 months. Assessment was by anal vector manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and continence scoring. RESULTS: Functional outcomes were similar in the two groups. Repair increased squeeze-pressure increment and improved continence scores in both groups. Postoperative wound complications were fewer when a posterior fourchette incision was used compared with a perineal incision (11 vs. 44 percent, respectively;P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed anal sphincter repair improves continence. A posterior fourchette approach is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications without compromising the quality of repair and the functional outcome.Poster presentation at the European Association of Coloproctology, Versailles, France, September 15 to 16 2000.     

Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury

INTRODUCTION: Although transanal ultrasound has rapidly become the test of choice for the diagnosis of anal sphincter injury, the accuracy and reliability of this technique are unknown. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior (obstetric-related) anal sphincter injury. METHODS: Sixty-two women underwent transanal ultrasound with hard-copy images obtained at 0.5-cm intervals from the anal verge to 2.5 cm into the anal canal. All transanal ultrasound procedures were also recorded on videotape. Two experienced ultrasonographers blinded as to the patients' clinical history and examination independently reviewed the images and videotape recordings for the presence or absence of anal sphincter injury. RESULTS: The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 22 incontinent women with known anal sphincter injury was 100 percent. The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 20 nulliparous women with intact anal sphincters was only 35 percent but improved to 50 percent after the real time videotape was reviewed (P=0.16) and further improved to 85 percent when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal (P=0.004). In these nulliparous women, intact internal sphincters were more accurately predicted than intact external sphincters (95vs. 85 percent;P=0.24). Measurement agreement between the two ultrasonographers was 68 percent (fair; kappa, 0.26) but significantly improved to 78 percent (moderate; kappa, 0.48;P=0.0001) when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal. Overall clinical agreement (final scan interpretation) was good (81 percent agreement; kappa, 0.61). Agreement was better for the internal sphincter (74 percent; fair; kappa, 0.36) than the external sphincter (61 percent; poor; kappa, 0.17;P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Although transanal ultrasound can accurately identify anterior anal sphincter injury when present, transanal ultrasound falsely identifies sphincter injury in at least 5 to 25 percent of normal anal sphincters. Only fair agreement in the interpretation of transanal ultrasound exists between experienced ultrasonographers. Both the accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound are significantly improved by limiting transanal ultrasound to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.     

Artificial anal sphincter

INTRODUCTION: Artificial anal sphincter has been proposed in severe anal incontinence when local treatment is unsuitable or has failed. The outcome after implantation of this newly developed device has not yet been determined. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (7 men; median age, 44; standard deviation, 18; range, 14–80 years) implanted since May 1996 for a minimum of six months at three centers were prospectively evaluated. Continence (scoring system, 0 (normal) to 120 (complete incontinence)), rectal emptying, and general satisfaction were assessed clinically and at anal manometry preoperatively and postoperatively at a six-month interval. The causes of incontinence included anal trauma (9 cases), neuropathy (6 cases), neurologic disorders (4 cases), congenital malformations (3 cases), and prolapse (2 cases). Median duration of incontinence was 7.5 (standard deviation, 8) years. Stomas pre-existed in two cases and was created at implantation in one. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20 (standard deviation, 8; range, 10–35) months. Seven patients had their devices explanted, and reimplantation was successfully performed in three of these cases. At the end of follow-up, 20 (83 percent) patients had an implanted activated device. Fecal incontinence score dropped significantly from a median 106 (standard deviation, 13) preoperatively to 19 (standard deviation, 32), 25 (standard deviation, 29), and 25 (standard deviation, 25) at six months, one year, and the end of follow-up, respectively (P<0.0001). Minor and major emptying difficulties occurred in seven and two patients, respectively. A high degree of satisfaction was achieved at the end of follow-up in 18 (75 percent) of the total series. Median anal pressures at rest on manometry increased significantly from 28 (standard deviation, 17; range, 5–76) mmHg preoperatively to 60 (standard deviation, 17; range, 38–96) mmHg with a closed cuff at the end of follow-up. These pressures dropped to 30 (standard deviation, 16; range, 9–65) mmHg with an open cuff, and reocclusion time lasted a median of 4.6 minutes (standard deviation, 3 minutes; range, 38 seconds to 10 minutes). CONCLUSION: Artificial anal sphincter provided prolonged and reasonably good functional results in severe incontinence, reproducing an efficient sphincteric mechanism and allowing satisfactory anal occlusion and rectal emptying in approximately 75 percent of cases in this study. The definitive explantation rate was kept low by careful patient selection and appropriate surgical and perioperative management.Supported in part by a grant from Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches en Chirurgie.Read at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' 100th Anniversary and Tripartite Meeting, Washington, D.C., May 1 to 6, 1999.     

Voluntary relaxation of the external anal sphincter

In this study five volunteers with special training in anal sphincter exercise (Scandinavian Yoga School) managed voluntarily to reduce anal pressure. The mean reduction of anal pressure was 20 mm Hg. In one of the subjects, this was shown by manometry during low spinal anesthesia and electromyography to be caused by relaxation of the external anal sphincter.     

Biofeedback versus electrostimulation in treatment of anal sphincter insufficiency

The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate a consecutive patient series (N = 70) with anal sphincter insufficiency and compare the efficacy of biofeedback and electrostimulation as conservative treatment options. Forty patients were treated by biofeedback training, 30 patients by electrostimulation. Patients were not specifically selected for one or the other treatment. Success was evaluated by vector volume manometry, water infusion test, time until stoma closure and clinical incontinence scores. Resting and squeeze pressure and resting and squeeze vector volume all increased significantly after biofeedback training (P < 0.05 and <0.001). Resting pressure and squeeze vector volume only were significantly improved by electrostimulation (P < 0.05 and <0.01). The increase in squeeze vector volume was significantly greater in the biofeedback group (P = 0.03). The estimated median time period from commencement of training until stoma closure was 9 months in the biofeedback versus 21 months in the electrostimulation group. Biofeedback training is probably superior to electrostimulation in the conservative treatment of anal sphincter insufficiency, this needs to be confirmed in a randomized study.     

Immediate repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture: medium-term outcome of the overlap technique

PURPOSE: Overlap sphincteroplasty is gaining popularity in the primary repair of obstetric sphincter ruptures. This study was designed to evaluate the medium-term outcome of the overlap technique.METHODS: Between August 1997 and October 2001, 31 consecutive females who were diagnosed with a complete third-degree or fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture underwent overlap sphincteroplasty immediately after delivery. Thirty of the females were followed-up for a median of 24 months. The outcome was assessed by clinical examination, anal endosonography, Wexner score, and pelvic floor electromyography.RESULTS: Median 24 (range, 12–63) months after delivery, 23 females (77 percent) were free of symptoms of anal incontinence. Occasional incontinence to flatus and liquid stool occurred in 17 and 7 percent of patients, respectively. Seven percent of patients had a Wexner incontinence score of > 9. The maximum mean resting pressure was 55 (range, 20–90) mmHg, and the maximum mean incremental squeeze pressure was 37 (range, 14–95) mmHg. On anal endosonography, an unrecognized internal sphincter rupture was found in one and a failed repair in two females. Overlap of the external sphincter was demonstrated in 29 patients (97 percent). One female with anal incontinence and persisting external sphincter rupture underwent redo sphincteroplasty.CONCLUSIONS: The median-term outcome of primary overlap repair for obstetric sphincter rupture is good; however, larger, randomized studies with a longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the advantage of this technique over the end-to-end technique.Reprints are not available.Presented at the meeting of Nordic Urogynecologic Association, Helsinki, Finland, January 24 to 25, 2002.     

Manometric squeeze pressure difference parallels functional outcome after overlapping sphincter reconstruction

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of overlapping anal sphincter reconstruction and to determine the manometric parameters that correlate with a successful functional outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who had undergone overlapping sphincter reconstruction for anal incontinence from 1988 to 1999 was undertaken. Only patients with preoperative and six-months-postoperative anal manometry were included in this study. Standard statistical tests were used to compare pre- and postoperative findings. RESULTS: A total of 52 overlapping sphincter reconstructions were performed on 49 patients (46 females). The mean age was 44 (± standard error, 15.8; range, 20–81) years, with follow-up at six months. Forty-two patients had a history of complicated vaginal delivery (episiotomies, tears, forceps delivery); 36 patients had a history of anal or perineal surgery; and two patients had perianal Crohn's disease. Nine patients (17 percent) had undergone prior sphincter repair. Incontinence grade improved in 37 patients (71 percent), and complete continence returned in 21 patients (40 percent). The presence of a rectovaginal fistula, postoperative complications, previous sphincter repair, and increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency did not affect functional outcome (P = not significant). Patients older than 50 years had a better functional outcome than their younger counterparts after sphincter repair (P=0.02). Although mean maximal squeeze pressure and mean anal sphincter length increased significantly after sphincter reconstruction (P=0.0006 and 0.004, respectively), only squeeze pressure difference correlated with functional outcome (r=0.37;P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping sphincter reconstruction improved anal function in the majority of patients. The most important factor in the return to normal sphincter function is an increase in squeeze pressure.     

Long-term outcome after overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence

Purpose

The aim was to assess long-term results and quality of life following anterior anal sphincter repair for anal incontinence.

Patients and methods

Twenty-three female patients underwent anterior anal sphincteroplasty over a 10-year period between January 1999 and January 2009 in a gynecological surgery department. Patients were asked to complete pre- and postoperative questionnaires comprising the Jorge and Wexner incontinence score. The secondary objective was to assess pre- and post-sphincteroplasty symptom severity and sexual quality of life. Mean follow-up was 87 months (median, 91.5 months). Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis was applied.

Results

Mean age was 52 years (±15.2), and mean postoperative Jorge and Wexner score, 7.5/20 (±4.1). Seventeen patients (85 %) declared themselves satisfied by the repair; 12 (60 %) showed good fecal continence. Fecal incontinence had a negative impact on quality of life for 15 % and on sexuality for 50 % of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 85 % conservation of anal continence correction at 1 year, 74 % at 48 months, 67 % at 60 months, and 48 % at 84 months.

Conclusions

Overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair provided lasting improvement in fecal incontinence, with satisfactory long-term functional results. At 84 months’ follow-up, 48 % of patients maintained good fecal continence, with a satisfaction rate of 85 %. Anal sphincteroplasty may be a first-line attitude in young female fecal incontinence patients with a recent sphincter defect following initially undiagnosed obstetric trauma and also restores perineal comfort.     

Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy: the first Caribbean family

Hereditary proctalgia is an extremely rare condition characterized by endosonographic evidence of internal anal sphincter (IAS) thickening and specific ultrastructural changes seen at light and electron microscopy (EM). We report the case of a 54-year-old Caribbean woman with severe proctalgia and IAS thickening, treated with IAS myectomy. Transmission EM showed PAS-positive inclusions and granulofibrillary smooth muscle inclusion bodies. Anal endosonography of 5 family members from 3 generations showed IAS thickening in all cases with reported proctalgia. The condition represents an isolated IAS myopathy which is a probable polysaccharide storage disease variant. This condition may require specific surgical therapy with specimen preservation and ultrastructural examination for optimal characterization and treatment.