Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new virtual colon dissection 3D visualization technique for CT colonography has a shorter analysis time and better sensitivity for detection of colonic polyps than interpretation of axial CT images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT colonography was performed in 22 patients using 4-MDCT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The CT colonography data sets were analyzed by virtual colon dissection, which virtually bisects and unfolds the colon along its longitudinal axis to inspect the inner colonic surface for polyps. The same CT data sets were independently evaluated using axial interpretation. All data sets were independently interpreted by two radiologists in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed 31 colonic lesions in 20 patients. Twenty two of the lesions were smaller than 10 mm; nine were 10 mm or larger. Two of the original 22 patients were excluded, one because of residual stool and fluid and the other because of an impassable stenosing rectal wall cancer. For virtual colon dissection, the per-lesion sensitivity was 42% for observer 1 and 68% for observer 2; for axial interpretation, the respective sensitivities were 48% and 61%. For polyps 10 mm or larger, the respective sensitivities were 67% and 89% for virtual colon dissection and 89% and 100% for axial interpretation. The average time for reconstruction and analysis of virtual colon dissection was 36.8 min versus 29.2 min for axial images. Virtual colon dissection was feasible in both the supine and the prone positions in 45.5% of colonic segments, in either the supine or the prone position in 24.5%, and in neither position in 30% of segments. CONCLUSION: Although virtual colon dissection may facilitate detection of colonic polyps in isolated cases, its detection rate is not superior to axial interpretation, which is mainly attributable to failed rendering of insufficiently distended colonic segments or regions with residual feces. Virtual colon dissection is also the more time-consuming of the two procedures. With further improvement of path-finding and image segmentation, however, virtual colon dissection has the potential to be a useful interpretation tool for CT colonography.     

CT colonography using different reconstruction modi

OBJECTIVE: Performing computed tomography (CT) colonography, we compared different reconstruction modi for the detection of colorectal polyps. METHODS: The CT data of 48 patients using 16-slice helical CT were analysed in axial slices, virtual-endoscopy and colon-dissection modus. RESULTS: The sensitivity (specificity) for the detection of colonic polyps was 94% (80%) if using "colonic-dissection" tool and 89% (80%) if using "virtual-endoscopy" tool. The difference between the virtual endoscopy and colon dissection, considering polyps up to 4.9 mm, was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction software colon dissection improves the sensitivity of CT colonography.     

CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps

The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity, specificity, and postprocessing time of a colon dissection approach to regular 3D-endoluminal workup of computed tomography (CT) colonography for the detection of polypoid lesions. Twenty-one patients who had received conventional colonoscopy after CT colonography were selected; 18 patients had either colon polyps or colon cancer and three had no findings. CT colonography was performed using a 4-channel multi-detector-row (MDR) CT in ten cases and a 16-channel MDR-CT in 11 cases. A blinded reader retrospectively evaluated all colonographies using both viewing methods in a randomized order. Thirty-seven polyps were identified by optical colonoscopy. An overall per-lesion sensitivity of 47.1% for lesions smaller than 5 mm, 56.3% for lesions between 5 mm and 10 mm, and 75.0% for lesion larger than 10 mm was calculated using the colon dissection approach. This compared to an overall per-lesion sensitivity of 35.3% (<5 mm), 81.5% (5–10 mm), and 100.0% (>10 mm) using the endoluminal view. The average time consumption for CT colonography evaluation with the colon dissection software was 10 min versus 38 min using the endoluminal view. A colon dissection approach may provide a significant time advantage for evaluation of CT colonography while obtaining a high sensitivity. It is especially superior in the detection of lesions smaller than 5 mm.     

CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of computed tomographic (CT) colonography performed in patients who were referred for further examination after incomplete colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. We identified 546 consecutive patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 401 [73.4%] women) who underwent CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy between November 1999 and December 2002. A retrospective chart review was performed if CT colonography depicted endoscopically nonvisualized lesions 6 mm or greater in diameter. Repeat colonoscopy rate, endoluminal findings, and PPV of CT colonography were determined. Subsequent colonoscopic findings were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: In 72 (13.2%) patients, CT colonography depicted 88 endoscopically nonvisualized lesions 6 mm or greater. Of 11 patients reported to have 12 masses (> or =20 mm), at subsequent colonoscopy, one patient had no mass. Eighteen patients had 23 large (10-19-mm) polyps that they were suspected of having, and 47 patients had 53 medium (6-9-mm) polyps that they were suspected of having. At a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 6-42 months), 45 (63%) of 72 patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy because of their CT colonographic findings. Rates of repeat colonoscopy for masses, large polyps, and medium polyps were 100%, 94%, and 45%, respectively. Per-patient and per-lesion PPVs of CT colonography for masses, large polyps, and medium polyps were 90.9% and 91.7%, 64.7% and 70%, and 33.3% and 30.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT colonography has the potential to become an accepted technique for evaluation of the nonvisualized part of the colon after incomplete colonoscopy, and it can increase the diagnostic yield of masses and clinically important polyps in this part of the colon.     

Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity of radiologist observers for detecting colonic polyps by using three different data review (display) modes for computed tomographic (CT) colonography, or "virtual colonoscopy." MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonographic data in a patient with a normal colon were used as base data for insertion of digitally synthesized polyps. Forty such polyps (3.5, 5, 7, and 10 mm in diameter) were randomly inserted in four copies of the base data. Axial CT studies, volume-rendered virtual endoscopic movies, and studies from a three-dimensional mode termed "panoramic endoscopy" were reviewed blindly and independently by two radiologists. RESULTS: Detection improved with increasing polyp size. Trends in sensitivity were dependent on whether all inserted lesions or only visible lesions were considered, because modes differed in how completely the colonic surface was depicted. For both reviewers and all polyps 7 mm or larger, panoramic endoscopy resulted in significantly greater sensitivity (90%) than did virtual endoscopy (68%, P = .014). For visible lesions only, the sensitivities were 85%, 81%, and 60% for one reader and 65%, 62%, and 28% for the other for virtual endoscopy, panoramic endoscopy, and axial CT, respectively. Three-dimensional displays were more sensitive than two-dimensional displays (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of panoramic endoscopy is higher than that of virtual endoscopy, because the former displays more of the colonic surface. Higher sensitivities for three-dimensional displays may justify the additional computation and review time.     

Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only

Patients at increased risk of colon cancer require strict colon surveillance. Our objective was to establish the efficacy of 2D axial CT colonography as a surveillance test when performed in routine clinical practice. Eighty-two patients at increased risk of colon cancer underwent CT colonography followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same morning. CT colonography studies were performed on a four-ring multidetector CT scanner (100 mAs, 120 kVp, 4×2.5 collimation) and were interpreted by two radiologists using 2D axial images only. Results were correlated with findings at colonoscopy. Note was made of subsequent histology reports from polypectomy specimens. A total of 52 polyps were detected at colonoscopy. Using 2D axial images alone, with no recourse to 2D multiplanar or 3D views, the sensitivity of CT colonography was 100, 33 and 19% for polyps larger than 9, 6–9 and smaller than 6 mm, respectively. Per-patient specificities were 98.8, 96 and 81.5%, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of polyps smaller than 1 cm were adenomatous and there were no histological features of severe dysplasia. CT colonography is a useful colon surveillance tool for patients at increased risk of colon cancer. It has a high specificity for identifying patients who should proceed to colonoscopy and polypectomy, while allowing further colon examination to be deferred in patients with normal studies. Using 2D axial images only, CT colonography can be performed as part of the daily CT workload, with a very low rate of referral for unnecessary colonoscopy.     

Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: a new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography.

Planar virtual pathology (PVP) is an isometric rendering method for examining the CT colonography dataset, which renders the colon in discrete colonic segments. Ten patients with 36 polyps were evaluated using traditional 2D axial, 2D multiplanar reformatted, and 3D endoluminal images as well as PVP. PVP displayed 13 of 17 (76%) polyps of >1 cm, whereas 11 of 17 (65%) were detected using traditional rendering methods. PVP may be a useful adjunct in detecting additional polyps at CT colonography.     

Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2004 to December 2005, 399 patients underwent CT colonography and follow-up conventional colonoscopy. We excluded cases of advanced colorectal cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the CT colonography findings and follow-up conventional colonoscopy findings of 113 patients who had polyps more than 6 mm in diameter. Radiologists using 3D and 2D computer generated displays interpreted the CT colonography images. The colonoscopists were aware of the CT colonography findings before the procedure. RESULTS: CT colonography detected 132 polyps in 107 of the 113 patients and conventional colonoscopy detected 114 colorectal polyps more than 6 mm in diameter in 87 of the 113 patients. The sensitivity of CT colonography analyzed per polyp was 91% (41/45) for polyps more than 10 mm in diameter and 89% (101/114) for polyps more than 6 mm in diameter. Thirteen polyps were missed by CT colonography and were detected on follow-up conventional colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: CT colonography is a sensitive diagnostic tool for the detection of colorectal polyps and adequate bowel preparation, optimal bowel distention and clinical experience are needed to reduce the rate of missing appropriate lesions.     

计算机辅助检测在结肠低剂量多层螺旋CT成像中的应用

目的 评估计算机辅助检测系统(CAD)设置不同的检测过滤器数值(SFV)时,在低剂量MSCT成像中对结肠病变的检测能力.方法 56例结肠癌和(或)结肠息肉患者行MSCT结肠成像扫描,依据结肠镜和外科手术结果,将病变分为4组:结肠癌、最长径≥10.0mm息肉、最长径5.1～9.9 mm息肉和最长径≤5.0 mm息肉,之后确定病变在CT图像上的部位及大小,作为评估结肠CAD系统检测病变的金标准.将CAD系统的SFV设为0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00共4个等级,分别检测CT结肠成像图像,记录CAD标注出的病灶的部位和大小,根据上述金标准评估CAD系统对结肠病变的检出率,采用x2检验比较不同SFV设置时CAD对各组病变的检出率.结果 56例患者共有159个阳性病灶,其中结肠癌为44个,最长径≥10.0mm息肉45个,最长径5.1～9.9 mm息肉32个,最长径≤5.0 mm息肉38个.将结肠CAD系统SFV分别设置为0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00时,病灶的检出率分别85.5%(136/159)、85.5%(136/159)、79.2%(126/159)和56.0%(89/159).SFV为0.25和0.50时,与SFV为1.00时,CAD对病灶检出率的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).随着SFV数值的减低,病灶的检出率增高,假阳性数增加,但91.4%(138/151)～93.9%(31/33)的假阳性病灶很容易识别,仅有6.1%(2/33)～8.6%(13/151)的假阳性病灶,需借助MPR和3D仿真内镜识别.结论 在低剂量MSCT结肠成像中,结肠CAD系统可获得满意的病灶检出率,可调节CAD系统SFV数值,以便满足不同经验阅片者的需求.     

Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 40 patients in whom the cecum could not be reached endoscopically despite adequate bowel preparation. Endoluminal CT colonography (120 kVp, 120 mA, 3-mm collimation, pitch of 2, 1.5-mm interval reconstruction) was performed within 2 hr of incomplete colonoscopy. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal images were analyzed. Twenty-six patients (65%) underwent barium enema immediately after endoluminal CT colonography. We analyzed colonic distention; duration of endoluminal CT colonography; patient tolerance; number of colonic segments seen at colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography, and barium enema; and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy as well as colonic and extracolonic findings. RESULTS: Duration of endoluminal CT colonography was 14.2 +/- 4.6 min (mean +/- SD). Endoluminal CT colonography was better tolerated than colonoscopy or barium enema (p < .001). Probable causes for incomplete colonoscopy were identified at endoluminal CT colonography in 74% of 40 patients. Baseline colonic distention in the region of the transverse and right colon was considered adequate before additional air insufflation; however, the addition of air significantly enhanced colonic distention throughout the entire colon (p < .001). Endoluminal CT colonography adequately revealed 96% of all colonic segments; in comparison, barium enema adequately revealed 91% of all segments (p < .05). CONCLUSION: In patients with incomplete colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography successfully showed the previously unrevealed colon in more than 90% of patients. Endoluminal CT colonography is a rapid, well-tolerated technique that provides clinically useful colonic and extracolonic information and should be considered for all patients who undergo incomplete colonoscopy.     

Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography

PURPOSE: To optimize scanning parameters for virtual colonoscopy utilizing a multislice Helical CT scanner in an in vitro study (using a homemade colonic phantom) and in a preliminary clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A colonic phantom was built using a plastic tube and 12 plastiline polyps were placed inside. The colonic phantom was studied with a multislice Helical CT scanner. Axial images were obtained with the phantom parallel to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of ascending and descending colon): oblique images were acquired with the phantom at 45 degrees relative to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of sigmoid colon and colonic flexures). Four different scanning protocols were tested: 1) slice collimation, 5 mm; slice width, 7 mm; table speed, 25 mm; reconstruction index, 5 mm; 2) slice collimation, 2.5 mm; slice width, 3 mm; table speed, 15 mm; reconstruction index, 3 mm; 3) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 5 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm; 4) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 4 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm. Quantitative analysis consisted in evaluation of the number of identified polyps and polyp size along the longitudinal axis. Qualitative analysis consisted in the evaluation of image artifacts and quality of 3D reconstructed images (step artifacts and polyp geometry distortion). This preliminary clinical study was performed in 12 patients (7 men and 5 women) who underwent multislice Helical CT colonography. We selected patients with clinical indications for conventional colonoscopy or after unsuccessful conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: Multislice Helical CT colonography was 100% sensitive in the detection of all polyps and in all scanning protocols. With oblique scans, only a 3-mm polyp was missed during protocol 1 (sensitivity: 92%). Polyp geometry distortion was observed on longitudinal reconstructions, whereas no distortion was seen on axial images. Image quality was graded as optimal for protocols 2, 3, and 4; protocol 1 was graded as good on transverse scans and as poor on oblique scans. In our preliminary clinical study, two colonic carcinomas and three polyps were identified. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the introduction of multislice technology in virtual colonoscopy permits to improve spatial resolution and image definition. The actual clinical advantage, in terms of increased diagnostic accuracy, needs further investigation in larger clinical studies.     

Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography

This retrospective study was institutional review board approved; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare a two-dimensional (2D) data interpretation technique with a three-dimensional (3D) colon dissection technique in terms of interpretation time and sensitivity for colonic polyp detection, with colonoscopy as the reference standard. Ninety-six patients (56 men, 40 women; mean age, 54.8 years) underwent colonoscopy and multidetector computed tomographic (CT) colonography on the same day. Two radiologists independently analyzed the data on a per-polyp and per-patient basis. The sensitivity of both approaches was compared by using the McNemar test. The time required to interpret CT colonographic data with each technique was also assessed. Compared with the conventional 2D colonic polyp detection method, primary 3D interpretation with use of virtual dissection software for CT colonography revealed comparable per-polyp (77% and 69% for two readers) and per-patient (77% and 73% for two readers) sensitivities and comparable per-patient specificity (99% and 89% for two readers) for the detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger and involved a shorter interpretation time.     

Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy

PURPOSE: To evaluate computed tomographic (CT) colonography in patients with clinical suspicion of colorectal cancer and in whom colonoscopy was incomplete. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After incomplete colonoscopy, 34 patients underwent CT colonography before and after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast agent, in supine and prone positions. Twenty patients with no evidence of colon cancer after complete colonoscopy were included as a control group. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography were determined for detection of cancers, polyps, and metastases to liver. RESULTS: In 29 patients, surgery revealed 30 colorectal cancers (three synchronous cancers) and two ischemic lesions of the descending colon. Colonoscopy missed 10 colorectal cancers and three synchronous cancers; all were detected with CT colonography. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of colorectal cancer were 56% and 92%, respectively, for incomplete colonoscopy and 100% and 96%, respectively, for CT colonography (P <.01). Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in detection of polyps were 86% and 70%, respectively, for diameters of 5 mm or less; 100% and 80%, respectively, for 5-10-mm diameters; and 100% for diameters greater than 10 mm. Spiral CT of the liver revealed four metastases (2-5 cm); sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 43% for nonenhanced scans and 100% for contrast-enhanced scans (P <.01). CONCLUSION: In this selected group of patients, CT colonography provided complete information to properly address surgery of colorectal cancer and treatment of liver metastases.     

Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps

OBJECTIVE: We compared the findings of time-efficient CT colonography with complete two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients undergoing colonoscopy screening were examined with CT colonography before endoscopy. Data were examined following one of two methods. In method 1, axial 2D data sets were examined in a cine mode. If findings were suggestive of abnormality, focal areas were examined with 3D CT colonography. In method 2, data sets were examined exactly as in method 1, and subsequent to that review, data sets were examined with simultaneous 3D "fly-through" CT colonography (surface-rendered images) and multiplanar reformatted images. The time required to examine CT colonography using each technique was recorded and abnormal findings were documented. Results of methods 1 and 2 were compared with findings on colonoscopy. RESULTS: Colonoscopy detected 16 polyps in 13 patients (polyp size, 2-10 mm). Ten polyps measured 5 mm or less, five measured between 6 and 9 mm, and one measured 10 mm or more. Using method 1, two of 10 polyps measuring less than 5 mm, three of five polyps measuring between 6 and 9 mm, and one polyp measuring 10 mm were detected. We noted no false-positive polyps. Average evaluation time was 16 min. With method 2, the same polyps were seen as with method 1. No additional polyps were detected, and the average evaluation time was 40 min. CONCLUSION: Axial 2D CT colonography can be performed quickly and is comparable with complete 2D and 3D CT colonography in detecting colorectal polyps.     

64层螺旋CT在结肠病变中的临床应用价值

目的:探讨64层螺旋CT三维重建与仿真肠镜在结肠病变诊断中的应用价值。方法:应用Siemens Somatom 64层螺旋CT对83例患者行一次屏气全结肠容积扫描,并利用工作站进行后处理以获取CT仿真肠镜(CTVC),多平面重建(MPR),表面阴影成像(SSD)和透明显示(Raysum)图像,并结合原始横断面等图像进行分析,并与结肠镜或术后病理对照。结果:CTVC检出14例结肠镜确诊为正常结肠中的13例,1例误诊为结肠息肉。CTVC检出37例结直肠癌中的34例,敏感度为91.89%,特异度为92.86%,假阳性率为7.14%,假阴性率为8.11%。CTVC检出21例42枚结直肠息肉中38枚,敏感度为90.48%,特异度为92.86%,假阳性率为7.14%,假阴性率为9.52%。还包括:家族性腺瘤性息肉病2例,溃疡性结肠炎2例,节段性肠炎1例,子宫内膜异位1例,肠梗阻5例。结论:64层螺旋CT三维重建及仿真内镜对结直肠病变的诊断有其独特的优越性,为临床提供比纤维结肠镜更丰富的信息,很有必要广泛应用于临床。     

Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of lower-dose multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients underwent multi-detector row helical CT colonography (beam collimation, 4 x 2.5 mm; table feed, 17.5 mm/sec; voltage, 140 kV; and effective dose, 10 mAs) followed by conventional colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy served as the reference standard. Two radiologists interpreted CT colonographic images to assess the presence of polyps or carcinomas. Sensitivity was calculated on both a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. In the latter, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements obtained in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was estimated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: CT colonography correctly depicted all 22 carcinomas (sensitivity, 100%) and 52 of 74 polyps (sensitivity, 70.3%). Sensitivity for detection was 100% in all 13 polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter, 83.3% in 20 of 24 polyps 6-9 mm, and 51.3% in 19 of 37 lesions 5 mm or smaller. With regard to the per-patient analysis, CT colonography had a sensitivity of 96.0%, a specificity of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 94.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The total weighted CT dose index for combined prone and supine acquisitions was 2.74 mGy. The simulated effective doses for complete CT colonography were 1.8 mSv in men and 2.4 mSv in women. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography ensures substantial dose reduction while maintaining excellent sensitivity for detection of colorectal carcinomas and polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter.     

Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in patients with positive faecal occult blood test: results of the Italian project Legatumori 2003–2006

Purpose

In the framework of the 3-year project of the Italian Legatumori (2003–2006), we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) colonography in detecting colorectal lesions in a screening population with positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT).

Materials and methods

Two hundred and thirty asymptomatic subjects (age range 45–80 years) were enrolled in the study. CT colonography was performed with standard patient preparation (no faecal tagging) and a 4-detector-row CT scanner. Image analysis was carried out with primary 2D analysis and the use of 3D endoluminal views to solve difficult cases. Patients were referred for conventional colonoscopy in the following situations: detection of three or more suspected lesions with maximum diameter ≤6 mm; evidence of one or more lesions with maximum diameter >6 mm; presence of colonic masses (maximum diameter >3 cm).

Results

CT colonography detected colonic masses in 12 out of 135 subjects (8%). It generated 93 false positives and 19 false negatives in the identification of diminutive lesions (≤6 mm), and 70 false positives and six false negatives in lesions >6 mm. Sensitivity was 83% in smaller lesions and 93% in lesions >6 mm; specificity was 45% and 59%, respectively.

Conclusions

In a screening population with positive FOBT, CT colonography without faecal tagging and no definite size threshold for the reporting of polyps showed very low specificity but high sensitivity in the detection of all colorectal lesions.     

Spiral CT colonography in inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE: Most of the studies on virtual colonoscopy are dealing with the role of detecting colorectal polyps or neoplasms. We have undertaken this study to evaluate the value of CT colonography in patients with colonic Crohn's disease. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Five patients (three males, two females, 23-51 years, mean age 42 years) with known (4) or suspected (1) Crohn's disease of the colon underwent fiberoptic colonoscopy and CT colonography in the same day or during a 1-week period. The images were evaluated with the so called zoomed axial slice movie technique and in some regions intra- and extraluminal surface shaded and volume rendered images were generated on a separate workstation. The results were compared to those of a colonoscopy. RESULTS: The final diagnosis was Crohn's disease in four patients and colitis ulcerosa in one. Total examination was possible by colonoscopy in two cases, and with CT colonography in all five cases. The wall of those segments severely affected by the disease were depicted by the axial CT scans to be thickened. The thick walled, segments with narrow lumen seen on CT colonography corresponded to the regions where colonoscopy was failed to pass. Air filled sinus tracts, thickening of the wall of the terminal ileum, loss of haustration pseudopolyps and deep ulcers were seen in CT colonography. Three dimensional (3D) endoluminal views demonstrated pseudopolyps similar to endoscopic images None of the colonoscopically reported shallow ulcerations or aphtoid ulcerations or granular mucosal surface were observed on 2- or 3D CT colonographic images. CONCLUSION: CT colonography by depicting colonic wall thickening seems to be a useful tool in the diagnosis of Crohn's colitis, which could be a single examination depicting the intraluminal, and transmural extent of the disease.     

CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated CT colonography as a method to stage colorectal cancer and detect polyps and cancers in patients with the disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients thought to have colorectal cancer underwent CT colonography, following a colonoscopy, in both the prone and supine positions. The transverse CT images, multiplanar reconstruction, volume rendered, and virtual colonoscopy images, were independently interpreted by two radiologists. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The diagnostic accuracy of TNM staging was calculated, and the sensitivity of CT colonography for the detection of cancers and polyps, compared with that of colonoscopy, was calculated using repeated colonoscopic and surgical findings as reference standards. The technical result for distention was also graded. RESULTS: In the 51 patients, surgery and follow-up colonoscopy revealed 21 colorectal cancers (one synchronous cancer) and 41 polyps. The diagnostic accuracies of CT colonography for TNM staging were 95%, 85%, and 100% for tumor, node, and metastasis, respectively. The sensitivity of both CT colonography and initial colonoscopy for cancer detection was 100%. The overall sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy for polyp detection were 90% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.001). The sensitivities of CT colonography for detecting polyps of 5 mm or smaller, of 6-9 mm, and of 10 mm or larger were 84%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. The mean overall technical results for the supine and prone positions were ranked as 2.80 (SD, +/- 0.4) and 2.78 (+/- 0.4), respectively, but were without statistical significance (p = 0.781). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that for patients with clinical suspicion of colorectal cancer, CT colonoscopy is valuable in staging the tumor and in detecting additional polyps or cancers in areas not evaluated by conventional colonoscopy.     

Role of CT virtual colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy in the evaluation of colonic polyps

Virtual colonoscopy is one of the recent advances in the field of CT post processing technique. It represents a type of 3D reconstruction technique which is capable of elaborating endoscopic endoluminal display of the colon without the use of real endoscope and hence it was named virtual colonoscopy. The aim of work is to evaluate the role of virtual colonoscopy in colonic polyps.