Phase I feasibility trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of administering a minimum of four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine (CPG) every 21 days without excessive dose modification or cycle delay in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) was given over 3 h followed by carboplatin concentration time curve (AUC) 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) (days 1 and 8) in the first cohort. A second cohort received paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 3 h followed by carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8). A maximum of eight cycles was administered. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received 89 cycles during the first cohort. Seven patients experienced 19 hematologic dose-limiting events (DLEs) within the first four cycles, including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 9), febrile neutropenia (n = 3), and omission of gemcitabine on day 8 (n = 7). This exceeded the threshold for nonfeasibility. In the second, less intense regimen, 36 patients were entered. Thirty-one evaluable patients received a total of 200 and median of 6 (range: 2-8) cycles. Thirteen of the thirty-one had 27 DLEs within the first four cycles including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 5), prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), febrile neutropenia (n = 2), and omission of day 8 gemcitabine (n = 18). There was one patient death secondary to a wound abscess and febrile neutropenia. Myelosuppression as expected was the dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: The schedule of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) (day 1, 3 h), carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1), and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) is feasible, with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line therapy for patients with suboptimally debulked, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A phase II trial of sequential doublets. The GO-First Study

OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active in epithelial ovarian cancer with minimal overlapping toxicity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced ovarian cancer when given prior to carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Chemonaive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable disease were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days (GO) for 4 cycles. This was followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days (CP) for 4 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty patients, median age 62 years (range 39-78), FIGO stages III (16) and IV (4) received treatment. The response rate (RR) after 4 cycles of GO was 80% (95%CI 61-99%) (4 complete responses (CR), 12 partial responses (PR)). Interval debulking surgery was performed in 7 patients (35%). After CP chemotherapy, RR increased to 85% (95%CI 68-100%) (CR = 13, PR = 4). Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Estimated median overall survival was 31.5 months. Toxicities of GO were mild; grade 3/4 nausea in 3 patients (15%) and vomiting in 2 patients (10%), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 5 patients (25%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 5 patients (25%). After sequential administration of CP, grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in 13 patients (72%). CONCLUSION: The sequential doublet regimen of GO followed by CP resulted in unacceptable neurotoxicity and is not recommended for further study; however, the doublet gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has significant activity in the first line treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IC-IV (AGO-OVAR protocol OVAR-8)

PURPOSE: A multicenter, nonrandomized, phase II study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability, toxicity, and activity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients who had radical debulking surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IC-IV received sequentially paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From October 2001 to July 2002, 55 patients were treated and evaluated. Main toxicities were hematological with NCI-CTC grade 3/4 anemia 12.7%, leukopenia 70.9%, neutropenia 76.3%, and thrombocytopenia 45.5. However, febrile neutropenia occurred only in 1.8%. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities were rare and occurred in less than 10% of patients. Toxicity-induced treatment delays occurred in 3.1% of cycles and resulted in early treatment cessation in four patients. Dose intensity reached 90.8% for carboplatin and paclitaxel, and 73.3% for gemcitabine. Objective response was observed in 10 of 14 patients with measurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The triplet combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin-gemcitabine is feasible and active, with manageable hematological toxicity and no unexpected nonhematological toxicity. This regimen has proceeded to phase III evaluation.     

A phase I study of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine toxicity and establish a maximum tolerated dose of outpatient therapy with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in women with advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer that was not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation therapy. A dose escalation through four dose levels was planned. Dose limiting toxicities were defined as grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic toxicity persistent to day 1 of the next scheduled cycle, grade 2 or higher central neurologic symptoms related to ifosfamide and grade 3 or grade 4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Twelve patients, aged 29 to 71, received 64 treatments and were evaluable for toxicity. No patient was withdrawn from the study due to toxicity. Two patients had received prior radiation therapy without chemotherapy, and seven patients had received radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. No dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose levels 1 or 2. Three dose reductions occurred at dose level 3 due to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The maximum tolerated dose is ifosfamide 2 g/m(2) over 2 h, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, and carboplatin at an AUC of 5 over 45 min. Grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 11 subjects. Two patients required growth factor support. Grade 3 or grade 4 anemia was seen in one patient. Grade 3 or grade 4 neuropathy was seen in one patient. Other grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity included muscle weakness, myalgia, cough, and shortness of breath. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with ifosfamide 2 g/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC = 5 appears to be a safe regimen for the outpatient treatment of women with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer and warrants phase II investigation.     

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

Pilot study of outpatient paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine for advanced stage epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, response rate, and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine as an outpatient regimen in the treatment of ovarian/non-ovarian and tubal adenocarcinoma. This is the largest completed study using this regimen as first-line treatment of these patients. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, eligible patients were initially treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) via 1 h infusion), carboplatin (AUC = 5), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) as an outpatient every 21 days. Gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) was repeated on day 8. After six cycles of treatment, responders were eligible for an additional three cycles of paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Colony-stimulating factors were used at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (median age = 58; range 41-81) with stage III/IV epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum received a total of 476 cycles of chemotherapy. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in 19.7% and 9% of cycles while grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia developed in 4.2% and 1.3% of the cycles. One hundred thirty-seven (28.8%) cycles of a possible 476 cycles of gemcitabine were delayed primarily due to grades 3 and 4 neutropenia. Forty-five (84.9%) patients exhibited a complete response and three (5.7%) patients demonstrated a partial response, for a total response rate of 90.4%. Twenty-two patients developed some degree of neuropathy, although there was no reported interference with activities of daily living. The patients' median progression-free interval and median overall survival was 15.5 and 40.8 months, respectively. Forty-one of the original 57 patients were alive at the conclusion of data collection. CONCLUSIONS: This report represents the largest completed study in the world employing this triplet regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced stage epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer patients. Although the study exhibited a high response rate, the neuropathy encountered in the study, and the need to eliminate gemcitabine in 54% of the patients due to bone marrow suppression merits further investigation of the dosing schedule. More recent gemcitabine data suggest that lower doses and a 2-week regimen may be as effective with less toxicity. A comparison of our results with the GOG-0182 study, that utilizes the same regimen, should be informative.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

Optimized sequence of drug administration and schedule leads to improved dose delivery for gemcitabine and paclitaxel in combination: a phase I trial in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

We examined appropriate sequence, schedule, and doses of gemcitabine (G) and paclitaxel (T) in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 (starting 1000 mg/m(2)), and paclitaxel (starting 135 mg/m(2)) on day 8 (groups A and B) or day 1 (group C). Drug sequences (G-->T and T-->G) were tested in group A. In group A, changing sequences of gemcitabine and paclitaxel infusion were evaluated. Sequence G-->T raised grade 3 alanine transaminase in two of three patients leading to use of T-->G sequence for remainder of study. In group B, maximum tolerable dose was reached at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Reducing paclitaxel to 150 mg/m(2) allowed escalation of gemcitabine to 1250 mg/m(2), but neutropenia-related treatment delays occurred. Giving paclitaxel on day 1 (group C) enabled administration of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) with minimal dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 41.0%, with 2 complete responses and 14 partial responses in 39 eligible patients. The schedule of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 1) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8), with sequence of T-->G, appears most suitable with tolerable toxicity and promising activity.     

Phase II study of carboplatin followed by sequential gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer

The aim of this exploratory phase II study was to evaluate sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination in chemonaive patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to evaluate time to progressive disease (TTPD); secondary objectives included the evaluation of 1- and 3-year survival, response rates, and toxicity. Following initial debulking surgery or biopsy, patients with FIGO stage IIC-IV disease received four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (day 1) every 21 days, followed by four cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 8) every 21 days. A total of 47 patients enrolled, 44 (93.6%) completed the initial four cycles, and 39 patients (82.9%) completed the planned eight cycles. The median and maximum lengths of follow-up were 31.2 and 43.7 months, respectively. Median TTPD was 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-21.0 months), and median survival time was 31.2 months (95% CI, 25.2-39.6 months). Survival at 1 and 3 years was 95.7% and 44.2%, respectively. Of the 43 evaluable patients, most (95.3%) of them achieved a CA-125 marker response based on Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) definition. The partial response rate in the seven patients with measurable disease was 46.4%. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia observed in 76.6% patients and thrombocytopenia in 12.8% patients. The sequential approach of carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer is feasible and well tolerated, and depending upon the findings from other major trials, it may merit further evaluation.     

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4-6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50-80 mg/m(2) cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.     

Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer: pathologic complete response and longitudinal assessment of impact on cognitive functioning

BACKGROUND: To determine the pathologic complete response rate of advanced ovarian cancer to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin with filgrastim, and assess the longitudinal impact of this regimen on quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were treated in the phase I portion of the study. Initial doses were paclitaxel: 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: area under the curve (AUC) 5 day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients were treated at the phase II dose. Pathologic response was assessed by second-look laparoscopy in patients with complete response. Patients completed longitudinal assessments of quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Maximally tolerated doses were paclitaxel: 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: AUC 5 day 1, every 21 days. Forty-eight percent of patients (13/27) experienced at least 1 grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Fifty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) of assessable patients achieved pathologic complete response. Median progression-free survival was 27.3 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not reached), and overall survival 43.6 months (95% CI, 42 months to not reached). Cognitive functioning did not decline during or after chemotherapy. More highly educated women reported a perceived decline in concentration and memory while on chemotherapy. Quality-of-life scores were maintained during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer achieved pathologic complete response to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin. Cognitive functioning did not decline by objective measures, although highly educated women reported subjective impairment.     

A phase II study of outpatient first-line paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

The purpose of this study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (PCB) primary induction therapy for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma. Twenty patients were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)), carboplatin (AUC of 5 IV), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) of body weight; q21 days for six cycles. Bevacizumab was administered at cycles two through six. Patients received 116 cycles of PCB chemotherapy (median = 6, range 2-6) and were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in 23.3% and 25% of cycles, with no incidence of grades 3/4 thrombocytopenia or anemia. Prior to cycle six, one patient was removed from the study due to grade 3 neuropathy and another patient was excluded due to clinical deterioration. There was no incidence of gastrointestinal perforations, and only two patients demonstrated grade 3 hypertension (HTN). No grade 4 HTN was observed. Eighteen patients were evaluated for response following induction therapy. Six demonstrated a complete response (30%) and ten exhibited a partial response (50%), resulting in a total response rate of 80%. One patient exhibited stable disease (5%), and one demonstrated disease progression (5%). The lack of bowel perforations and wound complications should mitigate some concerns regarding these side effects. This study suggests that first-line treatment with PCB can be safely administered to previously untreated advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma patients. The favorable toxicity results and reasonable response rate warrant additional study in a larger patient population.     

Phase III trial of induction gemcitabine or paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by paclitaxel consolidation in ovarian cancer

Objective

The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) induction regimens with or without paclitaxel consolidation therapy were assessed in ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods

Patients with stage IC-IV OC were randomized to either GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², days 1 and 8, plus carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5, day 1) or TC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m² plus carboplatin AUC 6, day 1) every 21 days for up to six cycles. Patients with complete response (CR) were allowed optional consolidation with paclitaxel 135 mg/m² every 28 days for ≤ 12 months. Patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy at induction doses/schedules until CR, disease progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. PD or death in 636 patients was required to compare induction arms with 80% statistical power for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint.

Results

Randomized induction therapy was received by 820 of 919 patients enrolled; 352 patients with CR received paclitaxel consolidation whereas 155 patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy. PFS was similar for GC and TC (median, 20.0 and 22.2 months, respectively; P = .199). Despite high censoring rates (> 52%), overall survival was longer for TC (median, 57.3 versus 43.8 months for GC; P = .013). Controlling for patient characteristics including performance status, residual tumor size, and tumor stage, there was no statistical difference in a multivariate analysis (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.99-1.52; P = .067).

Conclusions

GC does not improve PFS over TC as first-line induction chemotherapy in OC. Although favoring TC, overall survival analyses were limited by the study design and high censoring rates.     

Phase II study of sequential doublets: topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Incorporating topotecan into standard platinum/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer has been complicated by myelosuppression. This study evaluated sequential doublets of topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Forty-five patients (median age, 56 years; range, 38-77 years) with stage III/IV disease and GOG performance status <2 were enrolled and received four cycles of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 to 3) and carboplatin (AUC 4 on day 1), followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) via 3-h IV infusion on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1). All cycles were 21 days. Antitumor response was assessed after four and eight cycles; patients with clinical complete response (CR) underwent second-look laparotomy for determination of pathologic CR (PCR). Dose reductions were instituted for grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and for grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Among 41 CA-125 evaluable patients, complete and partial responses were observed in 29 (70.7%) and 11 (26.8%) patients, respectively. Of the 12 clinical CRs (43%) in 28 evaluable patients, 10 patients underwent second-look laparotomy, with 3 PCRs (30%). Median time to progression was 14 months and actuarial survival was 23 months. Neutropenia was the primary toxicity and cause of dose adjustments and delays, including two deaths. CONCLUSION: The antitumor activity observed is comparable with other series, although neutropenic complications were increased. Progression-free and actuarial survivals were slightly inferior. A Phase III trial (GOG 182) of sequential doublets in the reverse sequence is ongoing.     

Preliminary toxicity analysis of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube

The objective of this study was to provide preliminary toxicity data of multiple-cycle combination chemotherapy with intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel for further clinical trials. The toxicity data of 42 patients with mullerian carcinoma who underwent IP carboplatin therapy in combination with IV paclitaxel were retrospectively analyzed. Chemotherapy was repeated through the Bard IP port placed at initial surgery using IV paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 followed by IP carboplatin. The doses of carboplatin were either at area under the curve (AUC) = 5, 6, 6.5, 7, or 7.5. The toxicity data in a total of 237 cycles were analyzed. The median number of cycles for IP chemotherapy was 6 (range: 3-12). The incidences of maximal grade toxicities in all cycles were: grade (G)2/3 nausea/vomiting, 23.8%; G2/3 constipation, 42.9%; G2 abdominal pain, 28.6%; G2/3 sensory neuropathy, 14.3%; motor neuropathy, 4.8%; myalgia/arthralgia 33.4%; G3/4 neutrocytopenia, 85.4%; and G3/4 anemia, 35.4%. These were not related to the dose of carboplatin. The incidences of G3 thrombocytopenia in relation to the dose of carboplatin were AUC = 5, 0%; 6, 31.6%; 6.5, 44.4%; 7, 25.0%; and 7.5, 80%. G4 thrombocytopenia did not occur. A dose of carboplatin between AUC = 6 and 7 with IV paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 is warranted for further evaluation.     

Triplet combination of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in previously treated, relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: an experience in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (GCP) combination as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed ovarian or peritoneal cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at 800 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8; carboplatin (AUC of 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) were administered as 60-min and 3-h intravenous infusions, respectively, on day 1. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. RESULTS: Twenty patients (ovarian carcinoma, 19; peritoneal carcinoma, 1) received this triplet regimen as salvage therapy. All the patients had previously received at least one platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy and 17 of them had received platinum plus paclitaxel. The median number of previous regimens was 2 (range, 1-4), and the median platinum-free interval was 9 months (range, 1-18). A total of 130 cycles were administered with a median of six cycles per patient (range, 3-9). The overall response rate was 75%, including 12 complete responses (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1-80.9) and three partial responses (15%; 95% CI, 3.2-37.9). The other five patients showed stable disease (25%; 95% CI, 8.7-49.1). The median duration of the progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 3-20). Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with leukopenia being the most prominent (grade 3/4 toxicity in 35% patients), followed by thrombocytopenia in 20% patients. In addition, 35% patients had grade 3 anemia. All the toxicities were manageable and the patients recovered fully. Among non-hematological toxicities, the only notable one was grades 2 and 3 hepatic toxicity seen in two and one patients, respectively, necessitating a decrease in the paclitaxel dose in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: GCP combination is an effective salvage chemotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated and relapsed ovarian and peritoneal cancer. The significant side effects of myelosuppression and hepatic toxicity were of moderate severity and manageable.     

Bevacizumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer: low risk of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicity

The purpose of this preliminary study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of bowel perforation and hypertension in two separate advanced ovarian cancer patient populations following first-line therapy, comprising paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab. The first 20 patients were treated with six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC of 5 i.v.), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg of body weight); q21 days per an independent protocol. The subsequent patients (n = 12) were administered weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC of 5 i.v.) every four weeks, and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg of body weight) every two weeks for six cycles according to a separate, independent protocol. Bevacizumab was not added to either chemotherapy regimen until cycle 2. In both groups patients who achieved a complete response, partial response or stable disease at the conclusion of induction therapy received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) q21 days as maintenance therapy. A total of 170 cycles (median = 6; range 3-6) of primary induction chemotherapy, 140 of which contained bevacizumab, were administered. Moreover, 206 cycles (median = 9; range 1-12) of maintenance chemotherapy have been delivered to 28 patients thus far. There was no incidence of GI perforation and only two patients demonstrated clinically significant hypertension. Previous studies involving bevacizumab have raised concerns regarding bowel perforations and hypertension. However, we did not encounter difficulties with either of these complications. While we recognize that the risk for bowel perforation remains in the 5-11% range, the study's preliminary results suggest that first-line treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma with bevacizumab can be safely administered.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

Economic impact of paclitaxel shortage in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer

Objective

To determine the potential economic impact of a paclitaxel drug shortage in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated ovarian cancer.

Methods

A modified Markov state transition model with a 6 cycle time horizon compared two scenarios: (1) Standard treatment (STD): paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC 5 × 6 cycles; (2) Paclitaxel drug shortage (DS): docetaxel 75 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC 5 × 6 cycles. Adverse events, quality of life, and costs of chemotherapy, neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and anemia were incorporated. Key assumptions: (1) Costs and consequences were assigned only to grade 2 + neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and grade 3-4 anemia; (2) Grade 2 + neuropathy prompted a switch from paclitaxel/carboplatin to docetaxel/carboplatin or from docetaxel/carboplatin to carboplatin alone; (3) Febrile neutropenia resulted in inpatient hospitalization followed by G-CSF prophylaxis.

Results

The mean cost of 6 cycles of chemotherapy was $4939 in the STD and $16,107 in the DS scenario, for a cost difference of $11,168 per patient over 6 cycles of treatment. STD was the dominant strategy (less expensive and more effective than the drug shortage scenario). In sensitivity analysis, DS was more costly over a wide range of clinical estimates in each arm. A drug shortage that affects approximately 50% of women initiating chemotherapy is expected to impact 779 women and cost third party payers an additional $8,699,872 monthly.

Conclusions

Our model indicates that chemotherapy drug shortages can have a significant negative impact on the average cost of primary treatment for ovarian cancer and have the potential to negatively impact health system costs.     

Chronic administration of single-agent paclitaxel in gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE: There are currently limited published data available on the safety and feasibility of the prolonged administration of paclitaxel. The goal of this study was to review the cumulative toxicity associated with the continuous long-term administration of this agent to women with gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Eleven patients with gynecologic malignancies of varying histologic subtypes who received >15 consecutive courses of paclitaxel were identified in a retrospective review of individuals treated between 1994 and 1999 in the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center. The analysis excluded paclitaxel delivered as a component of an initial chemotherapy regimen for the cancer. Paclitaxel was administered at doses ranging from 80 to 175 mg/m(2) every 3-4 weeks as a 3-h infusion. RESULTS: In general, the patients included in this report were heavily pretreated and were continued on therapy either as a result of documentation of an objective response or with evidence of stabilization of disease (e.g., physical examination, radiographic evaluation, CA-125 antigen level) and the maintenance of a satisfactory quality of life. In the 11 patients, the median duration of therapy was 20 cycles (range: 16-36 cycles). Alopecia was observed in all patients. A single patient experienced grade 3 anemia and grade 4 neutropenia. Of note, there was 1 case of grade 2 and no cases of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in this population. CONCLUSION: Prolonged delivery of paclitaxel for >15 consecutive cycles can be safely administered to carefully selected patients with persistent or recurrent advanced gynecologic cancers.