Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis: a 12-month pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of unknown etiology frequently requiring long-term therapy for control of symptoms and prevention of relapse. Azathioprine (AZA) has been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of chronic active UC. However, the alternatives to treatment with AZA are limited. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisolone versus standard immunosuppressive treatment with azathioprine (AZA)/prednisolone in patients with chronic active UC. METHODS: The study was designed as an open comparison of MMF versus AZA. Twenty-four patients with active UC (Rachmilewitz score > or =6 points) were randomly assigned to the MMF (20 mg/kg)/prednisolone or AZA (2 mg/kg)/prednisolone group. The initial prednisolone dosage was 50 mg and was tapered according to a standard protocol. Treatment was scheduled for 1 yr. RESULTS: The rates of remission were higher in the AZA/prednisolone group (n = 12) than in the MMF/prednisolone group (n = 12) throughout the study. Remission rates were 92% versus 67% after 4 wk, 92% versus 67% after 3 months, 92% versus 67% after 6 months, 83% versus 78% after 9 months, and 100% versus 88% after 1 yr. The number of patients not requiring steroids was higher in the AZA/prednisolone group than in the MMF/prednisolone group. Moreover, in the AZA/prednisolone group no severe adverse events were recorded, whereas in the MMF/prednisolone group two severe adverse events were observed: one patient discontinued MMF after 6 months because of recurrent upper airway infections, and one patient exhibited a bacterial meningitis after 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with AZA/prednisolone appears to be more effective and safe compared to MMF/prednisolone in patients with chronic active UC. MMF might be an alternative treatment for patients with contraindications to AZA. To further evaluate the effects of MMF in active UC, a placebo-controlled double-blinded study appears warranted.     

Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a pilot study

We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks, compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit for some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.     

Response to azathioprine in ulcerative colitis

Summary Ulcerative colitis is considered to be the result of an immunopathological reaction in the wall of the colon. Hence 7 patients with ulcerative colitis, including 2 with extracolonic features, were treated with the immunosuppressive drugs 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine, mostly on a long-term basis. Six of the 7 patients showed varying degrees of clinical improvement. The most noteworthy effect was a striking decrease in lymphoid infiltration in the rectal mucosa.We are indebted to Dr. George Hitchings and Dr. Gertrude Elion of the Wellcome Research Laboratories, Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (U.S.A.) Inc., for generous supplies of azathioprine (Imuran).Aided by a grant from The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.Drug Houses of Australia Fellow for 1964.     

Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience

OBJECTIVE: Cyclosporin (CSA) is a promising alternative for patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) previously facing only surgical options. Concerns over the long term efficacy and side effects resulted in this investigation of the University of Chicago's 5-yr CSA experience in these patients. METHODS: All steroid-refractory severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with IV CSA from 1991 to 1995 were identified by using the university's IBD database, with additional information from patient charts and physician files. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with severe UC unresponsive to IV steroids were treated with IV CSA (4 mg/kg/day). Of 42 patients, 36 (86%) responded; 31 were continued on oral CSA (8 mg/kg/day) for an overall mean of 20 wk. Ten initial CSA responders had colectomies after a mean of 6 months. Of the 36 initial responders, 25 (69%) also received 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) or azathioprine (aza), and CSA and steroids were tapered. A total of 20% required colectomy, vs 45% of those not receiving 6MP/aza. In all, 62% of all patients, 72% of initial CSA responders, and 80% of initial CSA responders receiving 6MP/aza have avoided colectomy, with a life table analysis of "noncolectomy survival" of 58%, 70%, and 71%, respectively, at 5.5 yr. All colectomies occurred within 18 months of CSA initiation. Complications, resulting in CSA discontinuation in six patients, were all reversible, with complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: CSA successfully allows most severe steroid resistant UC patients to retain their colons, and provides time for "elective" colectomy in others, especially if 6MP/aza are also given. Careful monitoring for side effects, including PCP prophylaxis, should be part of the treatment protocol.     

The beneficial effect of azathioprine on maintenance of remission in severe ulcerative colitis

Background. The search is on to find more effective drug regimens for patients with severe ulcerative colitis, as conventional drugs such as sulfasalazine and its congeners fail to prevent relapse in a significant number of patients. Azathioprine has also been reported to be useful as a steroid-sparing drug in patients who suffer from frequent relapses. As these drugs when used individually fail to sustain remission in a significant number of patients, we evaluated the combination of these two drugs. Methods. Thirty-five newly diagnosed patients with severe ulcerative colitis were randomized into two groups; group A (combination therapy) received sulfasalazine and azathioprine, while group B (sulfasalazine monotherapy) received sulfasalazine and placebo. In addition, all the patients received steroids initially to achieve clinical remission. The patients were followed-up for a period of 1 year. The therapeutic outcome was measured by the number of patients who suffered relapse in each group. Results. All the patients completed the 1-year study period. While 4 patients (23.5%) in group A suffered relapse of disease, 10 (55.6%) in group B suffered relapse, the difference being statistically significant. The relapse-free period was also significantly longer in group A. Conclusions. Combination therapy (sulfasalazine and azathioprine) is more effective than sulfasalazine and placebo in the maintenance of remission in patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Received: November 20, 2000 / Accepted: September 14, 2001     

Role of azathioprine in severe ulcerative colitis: one-year, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of azathioprine in treating patients with severe ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: One-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SUBJECTS: 83 patients with severe ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Fifty patients who relapsed within two months on corticosteroid withdrawal were randomized into two groups. The azathioprine group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and oral azathioprine (2 mg/Kg/day). The placebo group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and placebo. Corticosteroids were tapered over 12-16 weeks. RESULTS: Five patients (2 in azathioprine group, 3 in placebo group) dropped out of the study. Three patients in the azathioprine group had side effects. The number of patients going into complete remission and partial remission was not significantly different in the two groups. The proportion of relapses in the azathioprine group was lower than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative colitis, azathioprine had no effect in achieving remission, when given in combination with prednisolone; however, it lowers the proportion of relapses. Side effects like pancreatitis and hepatitis are mild and respond promptly to drug withdrawal.     

Rectal lymphoma in ulcerative colitis treated with azathioprine

Primary malignant lymphoma of the bowel is a rare complication of inflammatory bowel disease. The association of gastrointestinal lymphoma, inflammatory bowel disease and prior immunosuppression remains unclear. We report the first case of azathioprine-treated ulcerative colitis developing rectal lymphoma.     

Infliximab for acute, not steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic alternatives for patients with acute ulcerative colitis in whom steroids would usually be contraindicated are rare. The antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, infliximab, has shown to be effective in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis in pilot studies. We therefore evaluated whether infliximab can achieve remission in patients with acute ulcerative pancolitis who were not steroid-refractory. METHODS AND DESIGN: Patients were eligible if they had acute disease with a modified Truelove and Witts activity score of more than 10 for at least 2 weeks and if they were currently not receiving immunomodulators or more than 10 mg/day prednisolone. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either three intravenous infusions of infliximab at 5 mg/kg (group A) or high-dose prednisolone (1.5 mg/kg body weight) daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 mg/kg for 1 week, followed by a weekly reduction of 5 mg (group B). Therapy success was defined as clinical response in terms of a decrease of more than 5 points from the baseline score and to less than 10 points total after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (seven women, six men) were randomized (six for group A and seven for group B). The median baseline activity scores were 13.5 (12-18) in group A and 14.0 (11-18) in group B. Five of six patients in group A and six of seven patients in group B showed therapy success after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab could be effective in the treatment of acute moderate or severe ulcerative colitis. The obtained data call for larger controlled trials.     

Intravenous cyclosporine in attacks of ulcerative colitis

The present study reports the results of intravenous cyclosporine in 32 patients with refractory and/or severe attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC). Twenty of 32 patients responded to intravenous cyclosporine; cyclosporine was clinically effective and improved colonic lesions. However, one colonic perforation and one postoperative death were observed in two patients with severe endoscopic colitis who had failed to reach clinical remission with high-dose corticosteroids and cyclosporine. Moreover, after a median follow-up of 190 days, only one-third of the patients avoided colectomy. No predictive factor of response to cyclosporine was identified. This study confirms that cyclosporine is effective in severe UC but suggests that its use could be associated with serious complications in patients with severe lesions who had failed to settle with corticosteroids and cyclosporine.     

Combination immunomodulatory therapy with cyclosporine and azathioprine in corticosteroid-resistant severe ulcerative colitis: the Edinburgh experience of outcome

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine is a fungal metabolite and a powerful immunosuppressant. While response to intravenous steroids in severe ulcerative colitis is in excess of 60%, the remainder of patients are left with the options of curative panproctocolectomy or administration of intravenous rescue therapy with cyclosporine. There have been conflicting reports on the efficacy of intravenous cyclosporine in acute ulcerative colitis, and there are serious concerns about potential toxicity and opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carnii pneumonia. There are also concerns about early relapse and colectomy following cyclosporine rescue. To date there has been a paucity of data available to help guide the gastroenterologist in the use of cyclosporine and the maintenance of remission once achieved. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2001, a total of sixteen patients who had received intravenous cyclosporine for acute exacerbation of their known UC (seven females, nine males, mean age 33 years) whose records were available for analysis. All patients were refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone (60 mg/24 h). Patients who responded to cyclosporine were discharged on a regimen of oral cyclosporine, oral steroids oral azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylate. RESULTS: Median disease duration was 5.4 years (range 0.9-25 years). All sixteen patients were initially treated with cyclosporine at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day. Nine patients were started on oral azathioprine (median dose 1.8 mg/kg). Seven patients underwent surgery (panproctocolectomy), although none had surgery after 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients with <7 days and >7 days intravenous steroid. Other parameters analysed were stool frequency at 3 days and CRP at 3 days. There were no significant differences between these groups. Median bowel frequency at day 3 was higher in patients who finally underwent surgery. At 3 years follow-up, 56% of the sixteen patients had avoided surgery by using azathioprine immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: The initial response rate to intravenous cyclosporine was high (69%). Side effects were documented in the majority of patients, but none of the patients had to discontinue treatment on account of these. Azathioprine has a useful role in maintaining the remission achieved by i.v. cyclosporine for acute ulcerative colitis patients. More than half the patients will avoid colectomy long-term when using triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine adding support for its relative safety and another role for its use.     

Compared azathioprine efficacy in ulcerative colitis and in Crohn's disease

AIM: To compare the 6-month efficacy and tolerance of azathioprine in 68 patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent chronic ulcerative colitis (n=30) or Crohn's disease (n=38).METHODS: Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index<150 for Crohn's disease and number of non-bloody stools<=3/day for ulcerative colitis, associated with prednisone requirement<=10 mg/day.RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent of patients with ulcerative colitis had distal or left-sided colitis and 84% of patients with Crohn's disease had pancolitis. Azathioprine was discontinued early for side-effect in 8 (26.7%) patients with ulcerative colitis and in 8 (21.1%) patients with Crohn's disease (NS). In patients treated at least 6 months by azathioprine, clinical remission rates were 77.3% and 70% for chronic ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (NS). Complete corticosteroids weaning was obtained significantly more often in ulcerative colitis patients than in Crohn's disease patients (59.1% vs 30%; P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Azathioprine seems to be at least as effective and equally tolerated in steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease patients.     

Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite treatment with corticosteroids, severe to moderately severe attacks of ulcerative colitis have a high colectomy rate. We intended to find a rescue therapy other than cyclosporin A, which imposes a high risk of side effects and cyclosporine-related mortality. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind trial of infliximab or placebo in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis not responding to conventional treatment. Patients were randomized to infliximab/placebo either on day 4 after the initiation of corticosteroid treatment if they fulfilled the index criteria for fulminant ulcerative colitis on day 3 or on day 6-8 if they fulfilled index criteria on day 5-7 for a severe or moderately severe acute attack of ulcerative colitis. Results were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary end point was colectomy or death 3 months after randomization. Secondary end points were clinical and endoscopic remission at that time in patients who did not undergo operation. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included (24 infliximab and 21 placebo). No patient died. Seven patients in the infliximab group and 14 in the placebo group had a colectomy (P = .017; odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-17) within 3 months after randomization. No serious side effects occurred. Three patients in the placebo group required operation for septic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab 4-5 mg/kg is an effective and safe rescue therapy in patients experiencing an acute severe or moderately severe attack of ulcerative colitis not responding to conventional treatment.     

Increasing fecal butyrate in ulcerative colitis patients by diet: controlled pilot study

Topical butyrate has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Butyrate is derived from colonic fermentation of dietary fiber, and our aim was to study whether UC patients could safely increase the fecal butyrate level by dietary means. We enrolled 22 patients with quiescent UC (mean age, 44 years; 45% women; median time from last relapse, 1 year) in a controlled pilot trial lasting 3 months. The patients were instructed to add 60 g oat bran (corresponding to 20 g dietary fiber) to the daily diet, mainly as bread slices. Fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) including butyrate, disease activity, and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded every 4 weeks. During the oat bran intervention the fecal butyrate concentration increased by 36% at 4 weeks (from 11 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM) to 15 +/- 2 micromol/g feces) (p < 0.01). The mean butyrate concentration over the entire test period was 14 +/- 1 micromol/g feces (p < 0.05). Remaining fecal SCFA levels were unchanged. No patient showed signs of colitis relapse. Unlike controls, the patients showed no increase in gastrointestinal complaints during the trial. Yet patients reporting abdominal pain and reflux complaints at entry showed significant improvement at 12 weeks that returned to baseline 3 months later. This pilot study shows that patients with quiescent UC can safely take a diet rich in oat bran specifically to increase the fecal butyrate level. This may have clinical implications and warrants studies of the long-term benefits of using oat bran in the maintenance therapy in UC.     

The role of azathioprine in the management of ulcerative colitis

The use of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis is unclear. The authors present the details and outcome of 47 patients who received azathioprine for either a) severe, resistant disease otherwise requiring surgery (28 patients) or b) patients with steroid dependence who have been followed up for at least 12 months (19 patients). Duration of treatment ranged from one week to 66 months (median, 12 months). Of the patients in Group I, 13 (46 percent) achieved remission, 11 of whom had not relapsed during a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 12 to 58 months), and 15 underwent surgery one week to 12 months (median, five weeks) after commencing azathioprine. In Group II, steroids were withdrawn or reduced in 12 (63 percent) patients and three patients required colectomy. Side effects necessitating withdrawal of azathioprine occurred in 12 patients (hematologic effects, 6 patients; gastrointestinal effects, 4 patients; other effects, 2 patients). Two patients required a reduced dose of azathioprine because of leukopenia. The authors conclude that azathioprine is a valuable therapeutic option in selected patients with ulcerative colitis.     

GI distension in severe ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: In previous retrospective studies in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC), small bowel distension was found to characterize a subgroup of patients at higher risk for both toxic megacolon (TMC) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). In this study we prospectively evaluated the prevalence of GI distension and its relationship to clinical outcome in patients with severe UC. METHODS: Of 109 consecutive inpatients with acute UC (admitted to the GI Unit of the University of Rome during the period 1995-2000), 45 had severe colitis. Routine blood tests and acid-base balance and plain abdominal film evaluations were performed upon admission and repeated every 1-3 days. The gas content of the stomach and small and large intestines was evaluated on plain abdominal films. All patients were submitted to the standard Oxford intensive medical regimen; clinical improvement, occurrence of major complications, need for surgery, and mortality were evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student's t, chi2, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, when appropriate. RESULTS: Of 45 patients with severe UC, 24 (53%) had GI distension. Three of these 24 patients had TMC on admission (all underwent surgery and survived), 21 showed increased GI gas content (four developed TMC 1-4 days after the detection of GI distension and were operated on, two developed MODS and died, and eight did not improve but were submitted to surgery and survived). None of the 21 patients with normal GI gas content had complications; all survived (five did not improve and required surgery). CONCLUSIONS: In severe UC, persistent GI distension characterized a subgroup of patients with poor response to medical therapy and at higher risk for TMC and of need for surgery. The development of MODS was the most important predicting factor for fatal outcome.