Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis

Background:

After lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for various spine disorders, adjacent segment disease has been reported. Most of the studies have focused on proximal segment disease. The author has reported sacroiliac joint degeneration in these patients. Based on our own experiences with an increasing number of patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthralgia after multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedures, we evaluated a surgical procedure called distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ for patients with refractory severe pain of the SIJ.

Materials and Methods:

Nineteen (19) consecutive patients were recruited and evaluated prospectively after undergoing distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ. The inclusion criteria for the surgical procedure were degeneration of the SIJ and failed conservative treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and CT scans were performed in all cases. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). CT scans were performed postoperatively and again at the final followup to evaluate assess fusion. The data was analyzed using the SPSS software (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) and statistical analysis was performed. The P values were based on the Student t-test.

Results:

The mean followup was 13.2 months. All patients had an instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The overall fusion rate of SIJ was 78.9% (15/19 joints). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared to preoperative values. The mean VAS score was 8.5 before surgery and was 6 at final followup, demonstrating 30% improvement. The mean ODI scores were 64.1 before surgery and 56.97 at the final followup, demonstrating 12% improvement.

Conclusions:

Refractory sacroiliac pain as a result of multi-level fusion surgery can be successfully treated with minimally invasive arthrodesis. It offers a safe and effective treatment for severe SIJ pain. Careful patient selection is important.     

Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of bilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion, using a new technique, in patients with a chronic SIJ syndrome. Seventeen patients with chronic low back pain, with a positive response to specific diagnostic tests for the SIJ, were considered candidates for bilateral sacroiliac fusion. The surgical indication was based on the results of local anaesthetic joint infiltration, temporary external fixation or bone scan. Ten patients had had previous surgery on the lumbar spine. Bilateral posterior SIJ fusion was performed with internal fixation and decortication of the sacroiliac joint, using a separate approach to each joint. Local bone grafting was performed. At the time of follow-up (on average 39 months after surgery), 3 patients reported moderate or absent pain, 8 marked pain and 6 severe pain. Seven patients showed a symptomatic non-union; union occurred in only 6 cases. Eighteen percent of the patients were satisfied, but in the other 82% the results were not acceptable. Reoperation was performed in 65% of the patients. Our results with bilateral posterior SIJ fusion were disappointing, which may be related with difficulties in patient selection, as well as with surgical technique. Better diagnostic procedures and possibly other surgical techniques might provide more predictable results, but this remains to be demonstrated.     

Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism

Background

Sagittal decompensation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is considered as late onset complication. Several mechanisms have been suggested, but little attention has been paid to the caudal end of lumbar instrumented fusion, especially sacral iliac joint (SIJ) deterioration.

Methods

Clinical histories and radiographic sagittal parameters of two patients with SIJ luxation after PSO are presented. The biomechanical failure mechanism and risk factors are analysed.

Results

Two patients underwent correction of fixed anterior sagittal imbalance by PSO, followed by pseudarthrosis revision surgery. Both of them sustained persistent sacroiliac pain, progressive recurrence of anterior imbalance and progressive pelvic incidence (PI) increase around 10°. An acute bilateral SIJ luxation occurred in both patients leading to sharp increase or PI around 20°. One patient was treated by SIJ fusion and the other patient was placed on non-weight-bearing crutch ambulation for 1 year. Both patients had a high preoperative PI (95° and 78°). A theoretical match between lumbar lordosis (LL) and PI was not achieved by PSO. Osteopenia was present in both patients. Computed tomography evidenced L5–S1 pseudarthrosis and sacroiliac joint violation by pelvic or sacral ala screws.

Conclusion

Patients with high PI might seek for further compensation at their SIJ when lacking LL after PSO. Chronic anterior imbalance might lead to progressive weakening of sacroiliac ligaments. Initial circumferential lumbosacral fusion and accurate iliac screw fixation might reduce stress on implants, risk for pseudarthrosis, implant failure and finally SIJ deterioration. Bone mineral density should further be investigated preoperatively.

     

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction with groin pain after an operation for lumbar spinal disorder. A case report

A 75-year-old male presented with groin pain after an operation to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis (L5). Groin tenderness was localized to the medial border of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Radiographical and physical examination raised the suspicion of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Injection of a painkiller into the SIJ relieved symptoms, including groin tenderness. Symptoms improved gradually, and finally disappeared after five SIJ injections. Groin pain has been reported as a referred symptom of SIJ dysfunction in 9.3-23% of patients. Prior to the patient undergoing surgery to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis, SIJ dysfunction had not been noted on physical examination. Long periods spent in the abnormal posture due to lumbar spondylolisthesis induced SIJ stress. After the operation, an improvement in daily activity actually increased stress on the SIJ, resulting in SIJ dysfunction. Certain pathologies, including SIJ dysfunction, should be considered as residual symptoms after operations for lumbar spinal diseases.     

Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors

Background contextLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has become an increasingly common minimally invasive procedure for selective degenerative deformity correction, reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis, and indirect foraminal decompression. Concerns remain about the safety of the transpsoas approach to the spine due to proximity of the lumbosacral plexus.PurposeTo address risk factors for iatrogenic nerve injury in a large cohort of patients undergoing LLIF.Study designRetrospective analysis of 919 LLIF procedures to identify risk factors for lumbosacral plexus injuries.MethodsThe medical charts of patients who underwent transpsoas interbody fusion with or without supplemental posterior fusion for degenerative spinal conditions over a 6-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior lumbar spine surgery or follow-up of less than 6 months were excluded. Factors that may affect the neurologic outcome were investigated in a subset of patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF.ResultsFour hundred fifty-one patients (males/females: 179/272) met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 15 months (range, 6–53 months). Average age at the time of surgery was 63 years (range, 24–90 years). Average body mass index was 29 kg/m² (range, 17–65 kg/m²). A total of 919 levels were treated (mean, 2 levels per patient). Immediately after surgery, 38.5% of the patients reported anterior thigh/groin pain, whereas sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 38% and 23.9% of the patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, 4.8% of the patients reported anterior thigh/groin pain, whereas sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 24.1% and 17.3% of the patients, respectively. When patients with neural deficits present before surgery were excluded, persistent surgery-related sensory and motor deficits were identified in 9.3% and 3.2% of the patients, respectively. Among 87 patients with minimum follow-up of 18 months, persistent surgery-related sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 9.6% and 2.3% of the patients, respectively. Among patients with stand-alone LLIF, the level treated was identified as a risk factor for postoperative lumbosacral plexus injury. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 was associated with persistent motor deficits.ConclusionsAlthough LLIF is associated with an increased prevalence of anterior thigh/groin pain as well as motor and sensory deficits immediately after surgery, our results support that pain and neurologic deficits decrease over time. The level treated appears to be a risk factor for lumbosacral plexus injury.     

Nerve injury and recovery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein-2 augmentation: a cohort-controlled study

Background contextDespite common use of intraoperative electrophysiologic neuromonitoring, injuries to the lumbar plexus during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been reported. Emerging data suggest that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) use during an anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion may be associated with an increased risk of neurological deficit. Clinical data on the sequelae of rhBMP-2 implantation in close proximity to the lumbosacral plexus during LLIF remains to be understood.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of neurologic deficits and pain in patients undergoing LLIF with and without rhBMP-2.Study design/settingRetrospective outcome analysis in controlled cohorts undergoing the lateral exposure technique for LLIF with and without rhBMP-2.MethodsThe electronic medical records of patients undergoing LLIF with and without supplemental posterior fusion for degenerative spinal conditions were retrospectively reviewed over a 6-year period. Patients with previous lumbar spine surgery or follow-up of less than 6 months were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups, Group 1 (rhBMP-2 use; n=72) and Group 2 (autograft/allograft use; n=72), and were matched according to the age at the time of surgery, gender, weight, body mass index, side of approach, total number of treated spinal segments, use of supplemental posterior fusion, and length of follow-up.ResultsImmediately after surgery, a sensory deficit was recorded in 33 patients in Group 1 and 35 patients in Group 2 (odds ratio [OR] 0.895; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.516–1.550; p=.739). At last follow-up, a persistent sensory deficit was identified in 29 patients whose LLIF procedure was supplemented by rhBMP-2 and 20 patients in whom autograft/allograft was used (OR 1.754; 90% CI 0.976–3.151; p=.115). A motor deficit was recorded in 37 patients immediately after the rhBMP-2 procedure and 28 patients treated with autograft/allograft (OR 1.661; 90% CI 0.953–2.895; p=.133). A persistent motor deficit was recorded in 35 and 17 patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, at last follow-up (OR 3.060; 90% CI 1.681–5.571; p=.002). During the first postoperative examination, 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2 complained of anterior thigh or groin pain (OR 1.987; 90% CI 1.133–3.488; p=.045). At last follow-up, there was a significantly higher number of patients in Group 1 who complained of persistent anterior thigh or groin pain than Group 2 (8 vs. 0 patients) (OR 16.470; 90% CI 1.477–183.700; p=.006).ConclusionsOur results provide evidence of an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficit and anterior thigh/groin pain after LLIF using rhBMP-2, when compared with matched controls without rhBMP-2 exposure. This study suggests a potential direct deleterious effect of rhBMP-2 on the lumbosacral plexus.     

Early Results of Sacro–Iliac Joint Fixation Following Long Fusion to the Sacrum in Adult Spine Deformity

Background

The sacro–iliac joint (SIJ) is the largest joint in the human body. When the lumbar spine is fused to the sacrum, motion across the SIJ is increased, leading to increased degeneration of the SIJ. Degeneration can become symptomatic in up to 75% of the cases when a long lumbar fusion ends with a sacral fixation. If medical treatments fail, patients can undergo surgical fixation of the SIJ.

Questions/Purposes

This study reports the results of short-term complications, length of stay, and clinical as well as radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous SIJ fixation for SIJ pain following long fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis.

Methods

A retrospective review of all the patients who underwent a percutaneous fixation of the SIJ after corrective scoliosis surgery was performed in a single specialized scoliosis center between the years 2011–2013. Ten SIJ fusions were performed in six patients who failed conservative care for SIJ arthritis. Average age was 50 (range 25–60 years). The patients were 15.3 years in average after the original surgical procedure (range 4–25 years). Average post-operative follow-up was 10.25 months (range 15–4 months). The medical charts of the patients were reviewed for hospital stay, complications, pre- and post-operative pain, quality of life, and satisfaction with surgery using the visual analogues score (VAS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires. Images were reviewed for fixation of the SIJ, fusion, and deviation of the implants from the SIJ.

Results

There were no complications in surgery or post-operatively. Discharge was on post-operative day 2 (range 1–4 days). Leg VAS score improved from 6.5 to 2.0 (P < 0.005; minimal clinically important difference (MCID) 1.6). Back VAS score decreased from 7.83 to 2.67 mm (P < 0.005; MCID 1.2). ODI scores dropped from 22.2 to 10.5 (P = 0.0005; MCID 12.4). SRS22 scores increased from 2.93 to 3.65 (P = 0.035; MCID 0.2) with the largest increases in the pain, function, and satisfaction domains of the questionnaires.

Conclusion

Fixation of the SIJ in patients that fail conservative care for SIJ arthritis after long fusions ending in the sacrum provides a reduction in back pain and improved quality of life in the short and medium range follow-up period.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9374-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Techniques of internal fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine

The indications and techniques for internal fixation of the lumbar spine in degenerative conditions have changed drastically since internal fixation was first applied to the spine almost 100 years ago. Anterior instrumentation and fusion may be used for repair of pseudarthrosis after posterolateral fusion; symptomatic lumbar scoliosis associated with degenerative disc disease; late pain secondary to posttraumatic kyphosis; postlaminectomy instability; and lumbar pain secondary to thoracolumbar kyphosis. Posterior instrumentation and fusion has been performed with Luque instrumentation over 3-4 levels in cases of multilevel instability. Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are required for lumbosacral fusion in lumbar scoliosis with degenerative disease, and surgical correction of postsurgical lumbar kyphosis (flat-back syndrome). The techniques are demanding but with attention to detail can be performed with acceptably low-complication rates.     

Lumbar foraminal stenosis,the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1

In patients with lower back and leg pain, lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is one of the most important pathologies, especially for predominant radicular symptoms. LFS pathology can develop as a result of progressing spinal degeneration and is characterized by exacerbation with foraminal narrowing caused by lumbar extension (Kemp’s sign). However, there is a lack of critical clinical findings for LFS pathology. Therefore, patients with robust and persistent leg pain, which is exacerbated by lumbar extension, should be suspected of LFS. Radiological diagnosis is performed using multiple radiological modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, including plain examination and novel protocols such as diffusion tensor imaging, as well as dynamic X-ray, and computed tomography. Electrophysiological testing can also aid diagnosis. Treatment options include both conservative and surgical approaches. Conservative treatment includes medication, rehabilitation, and spinal nerve block. Surgery should be considered when the pathology is refractory to conservative treatment and requires direct decompression of the exiting nerve root, including the dorsal root ganglia. In cases with decreased intervertebral height and/or instability, fusion surgery should also be considered. Recent advancements in minimally invasive lumbar lateral interbody fusion procedures enable effective and less invasive foraminal enlargement compared with traditional fusion surgeries such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The lumbosacral junction can cause L5 radiculopathy with greater incidence than other lumbar levels as a result of anatomical and epidemiological factors, which should be better addressed when treating clinical lower back pain.     

Clinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a case series of 100 patients

Object  

Failed back surgery syndrome is defined as persistent chronic low-back pain and/or leg pain lasting more than 1 year, despite of one or more surgical procedures. Instrumented spinal fusion has been offered by surgeons as a potential treatment to recover from pain and functional disability. Factors contributing to good outcome of instrumented spinal fusion have not been investigated extensively. This study evaluated the global perceived recovery and functional status of patients after instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.     

Microscopically assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Microscopically assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed on 27 patients who had either spondylolisthesis or chronic lower back pain after previous lower back surgery. Overall improved satisfactory results occurred in 22 of 27 patients. Roentgenographic, stable, interbody fusion occurred in 22 of 27 patients. The poorest results and highest rate of pseudarthrosis occurred in patients with double-level fusions. Pseudarthrosis occurred in four of six patients with double-level fusions and unsatisfactory clinical results occurred in five of six patients with double-level fusions. Advantages of the microscopic technique are better examination of the surgical site, less blood loss, and less surgical dissection than other surgical salvage techniques. This procedure should be reserved for single-level pathology in the lumbosacral spine.     

Persistent local pain after posterior spine surgery for thoracic lesions

Many surgeons have investigated local pain associated with posterior spine surgery for cervical or lumbar lesions. However, little information is available concerning local pain after posterior thoracic spine surgery. This prospective study was, thus, performed to investigate the frequency and clinical features of local pain after posterior spine surgery for thoracic lesions. In 29 consecutive patients undergoing posterior spine surgery for various thoracic spinal disorders, local pain was investigated before and after surgery. In all 19 patients with preoperative back pain presumably due to thoracic lesions, pain was well alleviated after surgery. In contrast, 6 patients (21%) newly developed persistent shoulder angle pain after surgery, which resembled axial pain after cervical laminoplasty. In 5 of these 6 patients surgical exposure was extended to the cervicothoracic junction, whereas persistent shoulder angle pain was independent of disease etiologies and surgical procedure, and all of the 5 patients had no other etiologies of local pain such as surgical site infections, hardware failures, pseudoarthrosis, other metastasis, and vertebral fractures. These results suggest that dissection of muscle attachments to the cervicothoracic junction would play some part in the development of persistent local pain after posterior spine surgery for thoracic lesions, although surgical exposure of the zygapophysial joints at the cervicothoracic junction might be a possible source of postoperative shoulder pain. Therefore, to minimize such surgical complications, muscle insertions into the cervicothoracic junction should be preserved as far as possible.     

Absence de fiabilité des tests cliniques et des blocs pour le diagnostic positif de l’origine sacro-iliaque d’une douleur

Mapping studies of pain elicited by injections into the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) suggest that sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS) may manifest as low back pain, sciatica, or trochanteric pain. Neither patient-reported symptoms nor provocative SIJ maneuvers are sensitive or specific for SIJS when SIJ block is used as the diagnostic gold standard. This has led to increasing diagnostic use of SIJ block, a procedure in which an anesthetic is injected into the joint under arthrographic guidance. However, several arguments cast doubt on the validity of SIJ block as a diagnostic gold standard. Thus, the effects of two consecutive blocks are identical in only 60% of cases, and the anesthetic diffuses out of the joint in 61% of cases, often coming into contact with the sheaths of the adjacent nerve trunks or roots, including the lumbosacral trunk (which may contribute to pain in the groin or thigh) and the L5 and S1 nerve roots. These data partly explain the limited specificity of SIJ block for the diagnosis of SIJS and the discordance between the pain elicited by the arthrography injection and the response to the block. The limitations of provocative maneuvers and SIJ blocks may stem in part from a contribution of extraarticular ligaments to the genesis of pain believed to originate within the SIJs. These ligaments include the expansion of the iliolumbar ligaments, the dorsal and ventral sacroiliac ligaments, the sacrospinous ligaments, and the sacrotuberous ligaments (sacroiliac joint lato-sensu). They play a role in locking or in allowing motion of the SIJs. Glucocorticoids may diffuse better than anesthetics within these ligaments. Furthermore, joint fusion may result in ligament unloading.     

Provocative sacroiliac joint maneuvers and sacroiliac joint block are unreliable for diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

Mapping studies of pain elicited by injections into the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) suggest that sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS) may manifest as low back pain, sciatica, or trochanteric pain. Neither patient-reported symptoms nor provocative SIJ maneuvers are sensitive or specific for SIJS when SIJ block is used as the diagnostic gold standard. This has led to increasing diagnostic use of SIJ block, a procedure in which an anesthetic is injected into the joint under arthrographic guidance. However, several arguments cast doubt on the validity of SIJ block as a diagnostic gold standard. Thus, the effects of two consecutive blocks are identical in only 60% of cases, and the anesthetic diffuses out of the joint in 61% of cases, often coming into contact with the sheaths of the adjacent nerve trunks or roots, including the lumbosacral trunk (which may contribute to pain in the groin or thigh) and the L5 and S1 nerve roots. These data partly explain the limited specificity of SIJ block for the diagnosis of SIJS and the discordance between the pain elicited by the arthrography injection and the response to the block. The limitations of provocative maneuvers and SIJ blocks may stem in part from a contribution of extraarticular ligaments to the genesis of pain believed to originate within the SIJs. These ligaments include the expansion of the iliolumbar ligaments, the dorsal and ventral sacroiliac ligaments, the sacrospinous ligaments, and the sacrotuberous ligaments (sacroiliac joint lato-sensu). They play a role in locking or in allowing motion of the SIJs. Glucocorticoids may diffuse better than anesthetics within these ligaments. Furthermore, joint fusion may result in ligament unloading.     

Primary lumbosacral stability after open posterior and endoscopic anterior fusion with interbody implants: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis

STUDY DESIGN: After posterior stabilization of the spondylolytic lumbosacral level, mobility of the fused vertebrae could be studied before and after an additional anterior endoscopic interbody fusion using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vivo primary lumbosacral stability of additional anterior interbody fusion after transpedicular screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In vitro studies indicate a significant decrease in segmental motion after pedicle screw fixation and additional anterior fusion. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric studies demonstrate the adequacy of transpedicular lumbar instrumentation in posterolateral fusions. There are no studies examining the effect of additional anterior interbody fusion after posterior instrumentation in vivo. METHODS: In this study, 15 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 underwent a two-stage open posterior and endoscopic anterior lumbar fusion using carbon fiber (Brantigan I/F) cages. At surgery, tantalum markers were implanted into the fifth lumbar (L5) and the first sacral (S1) vertebra. All the patients were examined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis after the first and second surgical procedures. RESULTS: After implantation of the posterior pedicle system only, the mean intervertebral mobility determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis was 0.23 mm in the transverse (x), 0.54 mm in the vertical (y), and 1.2 mm in the sagittal (z) axes. After additional anterior endoscopic fusion with carbon cages, the remaining translation between the fused segment L5/S1 decreased to 0.17 mm in the x, 0.16 mm in the y, and 0.44 mm in the z axes. CONCLUSION: Anterior endoscopic lumbosacral fusion significantly increases the primary stability of the posterior fusion with a pedicle system in two axes of motion.     

Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks

Low back pain persisting or appearing after a technically successful lumbar fusion challenges clinicians. In this context, the sacroiliac joint could be a possible source of pain, but the frequency of its responsibility is not really known. We used sacroiliac anesthetic blocks, the gold standard for diagnosis, to determine this frequency. Our second goal was to search predictive factors for a positive block. Our prospective series consisted of 40 patients with persistent low back pain after a technically successful fusion who received a sacroiliac anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control. The diagnostic criterion was a relief of more than 75% of the pain on a visual analog scale. We found a 35% rate of positive blocks. The only criterion that characterized these patients was a postoperative pain different from the preoperative pain in its distribution ( p =0.017). A free interval of more than 3 months between surgery and appearance of the pain had an indicative value ( p =0.17). An increased uptake in the sacroiliac on bone scintigraphy or a past history of posterior iliac bone-graft harvesting had no significant value ( p =0.74 and p =1.0, respectively). The sacroiliac joint is a possible source of pain after lumbar fusion. The anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control remains the gold standard.     

Results of dorsal lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis without implant in previously surgically treated back patients

Lumbosacral fusions of the L4/5 and L5/S1 segment were performed in 168 patients with a tricortical iliac crest bone graft between the spinal processes L4 and S1 and two posterolateral fusions (LSDS). At follow-up five or more years after surgery, 46 of 55 patients with prior back surgery had a solid bony fusion. Pain was reduced in 94% of the failed back patients; 61.8% were satisfied with the result. On a ten-point scale from no (0) up to unacceptable (10) pain, the degree of back-pain decreased five years after fusion from 9.1 to 4.9 points, while the leg pain was reduced from 8.5 to 4.3. During surgery and the early postoperative period four major complications occurred in 168 patients. Twice the dura was perforated and two graft luxations were seen. No deep wound infections and no nerve root lesions were seen after surgery. The average blood loss was substituted by 2.4 erythrocyte concentrates. The lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis is a fusion of the two lower lumbar segments with satisfactory clinical and radiological results and a low complication rate. In patients with a failed back syndrome the pain in most cases decreased. The fact that 38.2% of the patients are unsatisfied with the result is most likely due to the severe scar tissue following prior surgery.     

Editorial Commentary: Spine Pathology May Compromise the Results of Hip Arthroscopy: Will Hip Arthroscopy Improve Low Back Pain?

Pathology of the lumbar spine and hip commonly occur concurrently. The hip–spine connection has been well documented in the hip arthroplasty literature but until recently has been largely ignored in the setting of hip arthroscopy. Physical examination and diagnostic workup of the lumbosacral junction are warranted to further our understanding of the effects of lumbosacral motion and pathology in patients with concomitant femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. An understanding of this relationship will better allow surgeons to counsel and preoperatively optimize patients undergoing evaluation and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Several studies have reported that patients with a previous lumbar arthrodesis undergoing hip arthroplasty have lower patient-reported outcomes and greater revision rates compared with patients without previous lumbar surgery, and similar to its effect on outcomes after hip arthroplasty, lumbar spine disease can compromise outcomes after hip arthroscopy. On the other side of the coin, hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve low back pain in patients with concomitant hip osteoarthritis. Can the arthroscopic treatment of nonarthritic hip pathology offer a similar result? We won't know unless we look.     

Foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine: a review of 65 surgical cases

This study provides clinical and radiographic information and characteristics that may best define the presence of significant lumbar foraminal stenosis and reports on the outcome of surgical intervention. Although anatomy of the lumbar intervertebral foramen (including static and dynamic pathologic compression of the exiting nerve root) has been described, few studies have focused on the clinical and radiographic features of foraminal stenosis requiring surgical intervention. We retrospectively studied 65 patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis for presenting clinical and radiographic features and intraoperative findings. Symptoms included leg and back pain (100%), paresthesias (45%), and subjective weakness (31%). Examination revealed lumbar tenderness (71%), limited lumbar extension (57%), focal motor weakness (48%), and positive tension signs (42%). The L5 nerve root was most often involved (75%). Almost 50% of patients had already undergone spinal decompression surgery. Surgical procedures included laminectomy and foraminotomy (52 patients) and laminotomy and foraminotomy (23 patients). A concomitant arthrodesis was performed in 63 patients. There were 29 excellent, 25 good, 6 fair, and 5 poor results based on a modified outcome scale at 32.5-month follow-up. Findings suggest that foraminal stenosis is a frequent cause of persistent symptoms after surgery, is most common at the lumbosacral junction, is best identified on parasagittal magnetic resonance images or on images reconstructed with computed tomography, and may be static or dynamic in etiology.