5-Year Results of Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy Applied as a Boost after Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients at High Risk for Local Recurrence from Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate effect, toxicity, and cosmesis of a prospectively applied pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy boost schedule in patients with stage I/II/IIIa invasive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 113 patients were treated after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and external beam radiotherapy (median 50 Gy, range 46-52). The boost dose was graded in accordance to the pathologic tumor characteristics: 20-25 Gy: incomplete resection (n = 34), vascular invasion (n = 27), close margin resection (n = 41); 15 Gy: T2G3 stage (n = 11). PDR brachytherapy (37 GBq, (192)Ir source) was carried out after geometric volume optimization with 1 Gy/pulse/h. The implantation and dose specification were performed similar to the rules of the Paris system. RESULTS: The overall local failure rate after a median follow-up of 61 months was 4.4% (5/113). The actuarial 5- and 8-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. Cosmesis was rated by 90% of the patients as excellent or good. 14/113 patients experienced grade III (all caused by planar telangiectasia) and none of the patients grade IV late toxicity of the skin (RTOG/EORTC). A boost dose of 25 Gy resulted in a significantly higher rate of late toxicity (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PDR brachytherapy is safe, effective, and provides good cosmesis. A CLDR breast boost can be replaced by PDR brachytherapy without significant loss of therapeutic ratio.     

Dose-dependent differential effects of low and pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy in a radioresistant syngenic rat prostate tumour model

Purpose : To study the response of the Dunning prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1 subline) to continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. Materials and methods : After subcutaneous tumour transplantation into the thigh of the Copenhagen rat, doses of 0, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy were applied to the tumour surface (tumour diameter 9 ±1mm). Eight animals were irradiated per dose group and exposure condition. Interstitial PDR (192 Ir source, 37 GBq) and CLDR (192 Ir seed, 150 MBq) brachytherapy were carried out with 0.75 Gy/pulse h -1 and a dose-rate of 0.75Gyh -1, respectively. Treatment response was assessed in terms of growth delay expressed as the time (T 5) required for each tumour to reach five times the initial tumour volume. Results : The median T 5 times for the CLDR groups (in the order: control, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy) were 12 (12), 54.5 (21), 64.5 (31), 85.5 (51), and 65 (47.5) days. Values after PDR brachytherapy are given in parentheses and resulted in a significantly impaired tumour growth delay (log-rank test) in the 20Gy (p =0.006) and 30 Gy (p =0.036) groups. No significant difference was found in the 40-50 Gy dose range. Conclusions : In contrast to previous results and predictions of biological models we observed dose-dependent differential effects of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy with reduced efficacy of PDR in the lower dose range.     

Locally recurrent breast cancer: pulse dose rate brachytherapy for repeat irradiation following lumpectomy-- a second chance to preserve the breast

PURPOSE: To perform and assess the effectiveness of local excision of recurrent tumor followed by postoperative pulse dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, 17 patients who had small recurrent breast carcinomas after initially undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT), which included postoperative radiation therapy, were treated with local tumor excision and PDR brachytherapy. Recurrences occurred at a median time of 50 months (range, 11-208 months) after primary treatment. Eight patients underwent a combination of PDR brachytherapy (total dose range, 12.5-28.0 Gy) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBT) (total dose range, 12-30 Gy). Nine patients underwent radiation therapy with 40.2-50.0-Gy PDR brachytherapy only. The prescribed radiation dose was 0.5-1.0 Gy per pulse. Patients were examined for local tumor control and treatment-related side effects. RESULTS: Twelve of 17 patients had no local tumor at a median follow-up time of 59 months (range, 20-84 months); two of these patients showed signs of having distant disease. One patient died after a cerebral stroke without evidence of tumor. Four women treated with combined EBT and brachytherapy had secondary local tumor recurrences 4, 8, 8, and 11 months after therapy and had to undergo mastectomy. Despite having undergone radiation therapy previously, patients had side effects limited to moderate (grade 1-2) fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Local tumor excision combined with PDR brachytherapy for small local-regional tumor recurrences after primary BCT is feasible and well tolerated and might obviate mastectomy. Preliminary experiences are encouraging. Further studies are required for appropriate patient selection.     

Dose-dependent differential effects of low and pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy in a radioresistant syngenic rat prostate tumour model

PURPOSE: To study the response of the Dunning prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1 subline) to continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After subcutaneous tumour transplantation into the thigh of the Copenhagen rat, doses of 0, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy were applied to the tumour surface (tumour diameter 9+/-1mm). Eight animals were irradiated per dose group and exposure condition. Interstitial PDR ((192)Ir source, 37 GBq) and CLDR ((192)Ir seed, 150 MBq) brachytherapy were carried out with 0.75 Gy/pulse h(-1) and a dose-rate of 0.75Gyh(-1), respectively. Treatment response was assessed in terms of growth delay expressed as the time (T(5)) required for each tumour to reach five times the initial tumour volume. RESULTS: The median T(5) times for the CLDR groups (in the order: control, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy) were 12 (12), 54.5 (21), 64.5 (31), 85.5 (51), and 65 (47.5) days. Values after PDR brachytherapy are given in parentheses and resulted in a significantly impaired tumour growth delay (log-rank test) in the 20Gy (p =0.006) and 30 Gy (p =0.036) groups. No significant difference was found in the 40-50 Gy dose range. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous results and predictions of biological models we observed dose-dependent differential effects of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy with reduced efficacy of PDR in the lower dose range.     

Preliminary Report of Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Head-and-Neck Cancer

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and acute/delayed toxicity of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR BT) in head-and-neck tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 head and neck cancer patients underwent interstitial or contact PDR BT at a dose of 10.2-70 Gy (median, 70 Gy) and 0.6 or 1.0 Gy/pulse/h. 42 patients were administered BT as part of their curative treatment; 32 of them had sole BT. Three reirradiated patients with recurrent tumor had palliative BT. RESULTS: PDR BT was well tolerated. Intense bleeding was the only complication associated with catheter removal from the tongue and bucca. 44 patients who completed BT experienced acute mucositis. Grade 3 toxicity of skin and oral mucosa occurred in three (6.8%) and six patients (13.6%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 2-67 months), late serious toxicity (grade 4, for soft tissue and bone) was seen in seven patients (15.9%). Among the parameters analyzed, only dental care performed before BT had a significant impact on mucosal side effects. Acute severe mucositis was observed in 23% of patients without dental care compared to 0% of those with dental care (p=0.044). Late severe mucositis occurred in 17.7% and 26.9% of the respective patients (p=0.035), overall in 23%. The larger the volume encompassed by the reference isodose, the more late (p=0.004) mucosal reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: PDR BT continued over a few days is a feasible and safe approach in head-and-neck tumors; however, it is accompanied by some toxicity. Dental care should precede isotope application.     

Long-term results of pulsed irradiation of skin metastases from breast cancer. Effectiveness and sequelae.

PURPOSE: The concept of pulsed brachytherapy suggested by Brenner and Hall requires an unusual fractionation scheme. Effectiveness and sequelae of this new irradiation method were observed in patients with disseminated cutaneous metastases of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A flexible, reusable skin mold (weight 110 g) was developed for use with a pulsed dose rate (PDR) afterloader. An array of 18 parallel catheters (2 mm diameter) at equal distances of 10 or 12 mm was constructed by fixation of the catheters in a plastic wire mesh. The array is sewn between 2 foam rubber slabs of 5 mm thickness to provide a defined constant distance to the skin. Irradiations are possible up to a maximum field size of 20 x 23.5 cm using a nominal 37 GBq Ir-192 source. Pulses of 1 Gy reference dose at the skin surface are applied at a rate of 1 pulse every 1.2 hours (0.8 Gy per hour). The dose distribution is geometrically optimized to provide a homogeneous skin dose (100% +/- 10%). The 80% dose level lies at 5 mm below the skin surface. Between April 1994 and December 1997, 52 patients suffering from cutaneous metastases at the thoracic wall were treated with 54 fields and total doses of 38 to 50 Gy (median 42 Gy) applying 2 PDR courses with a pause of 4 to 5 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (48 fields) were eligible for evaluation in June 1998. The median follow-up was 16 months (range 7.1 to 46.2 months). Local control was achieved in 40 out of 48 fields (83%) or 41 of 46 patients (89%), respectively. Moist desquamation occurred in 52% of the patients. Late reactions were judged after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Thirty-two fields had been previously irradiated with external beam therapy to doses of 40 to 60 Gy. Regardless of whether the skin was preirradiated or not all patients surviving long enough developed telangiectasia within 2 years after PDR irradiation. In preirradiated patients (n = 32) skin contractures and/or skin necrosis occurred in 12% each. In newly irradiated patients (n = 14) no contractures or skin necrosis were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed brachytherapy is an effective and time-sparing method for the treatment of cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. Skin reactions are comparable to the sequelae of orthovoltage therapy. Two sessions of approximately 20 Gy PDR were tolerated on preirradiated skin without severe sequelae.     

5-Year Results of Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy Applied as a Boost after Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients at High Risk for Local Recurrence from Breast Cancer

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate effect, toxicity, and cosmesis of a prospectively applied pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy boost schedule in patients with stage I/II/IIIa invasive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 113 patients were treated after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and external beam radiotherapy (median 50 Gy, range 46-52). The boost dose was graded in accordance to the pathologic tumor characteristics: 20-25 Gy: incomplete resection (n = 34), vascular invasion (n = 27), close margin resection (n = 41); 15 Gy: T2G3 stage (n = 11). PDR brachytherapy (37 GBq, ¹⁹²Ir source) was carried out after geometric volume optimization with 1 Gy/pulse/h. The implantation and dose specification were performed similar to the rules of the Paris system. Results: The overall local failure rate after a median follow-up of 61 months was 4.4% (5/113). The actuarial 5- and 8-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. Cosmesis was rated by 90% of the patients as excellent or good. 14/113 patients experienced grade III (all caused by planar telangiectasia) and none of the patients grade IV late toxicity of the skin (RTOG/EORTC). A boost dose of 25 Gy resulted in a significantly higher rate of late toxicity (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.01). Conclusions: PDR brachytherapy is safe, effective, and provides good cosmesis. A CLDR breast boost can be replaced by PDR brachytherapy without significant loss of therapeutic ratio. Ziel: Diese Studie diente der Evaluierung von Effektivität, Toxizität und kosmetischen Ergebnissen eines prospektiv applizierten PDR- (pulsed dose-rate-)Brachytherapieboostkonzeptes bei Patienten mit invasivem Mammakarzinom im Stadium I/II/IIIa. Patienten und Methoden: Insgesamt wurden 113 Patienten nach brusterhaltender Therapie (BET) und externer Bestrahlung (Median 50 Gy, Range 46-52) behandelt. Die Boostdosis wurde anhand histopathologischer Tumorcharakteristika graduiert (Tabelle 1): 20-25 Gy: inkomplette Resektion (n = 34), Lymphgefäß- oder Gefäßinvasion (n = 27), "close-margin"-Resektion (n = 41); 15 Gy: T2G3 Stadium (n = 11). Die gepulste Brachytherapie (37 GBq, ¹⁹²Ir-Quelle) wurde nach geometrischer Volumenoptimierung mit 1 Gy/Puls/h durchgeführt. Applikation und Dosisspezifikation erfolgten in Anlehnung an das Pariser System. Ergebnisse: Die Lokalrezidivrate betrug nach einer medianen Nachbeobachtungszeit von 61 Monaten 4,4% (5/113). Das aktuarische lokalrezidivfreie 5- und 8-Jahres-Überleben betrug 95% bzw. 93% (Abbildungen 1 und 2). 90% der Patienten beurteilten ihre kosmetischen Ergebnisse als gut oder exzellent (Tablle 3). Bedingt durch flächige Teleangiektasien im Boostareal entwickelten 14/113 Patienten eine Grad-III-Spättoxizität (0/113 Grad IV) der haut (RTOG/EORTC, Tabelle 2). Eine Boostdosis von 25 Gy resultierte in einer signifikant erhöhten Spättoxizitätsrate (Fishers Exakt-Test, p < 0,01, Abbildung 3). Schlussfolgerung: Die gepulste Brachytherapie ist sicher und effektiv. Die kosmetischen Ergebnisse sind gut. Der interstitielle CLDR-Mammaboost kann durch die PDR-Brachytherapie ohne signifikanten Verlust an therapeutischer Breite ersetzt werden.     

Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE: To present the results of a prospective phase II study in esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received single doses of 1.8 Gy up to 27 Gy, then concomitant boost to a total of 50.4 Gy (PTV2 [planning target volume], single dose 1.8 Gy) and 64.8 Gy (PTV1, single dose 1.2 Gy in the morning and 1.8 Gy in the afternoon) concurrently with 800 mg/m(2)/d 5-fluorouracil and 20 mg/m(2)/d cisplatin (weeks 1 and 5). High-dose-rate brachytherapy (2-3 x 6 Gy) on Fridays of weeks 4-6 used a customized applicator facilitating central placement and circumferential dose homogeneity. RESULTS: 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (90%) or adenocarcinoma and mostly advanced tumor stage were treated (82% T3/T4 and 70% N1). Median overall survival (median OS 16 months; 1-year-OS 61%; 2-year OS 29%) was significantly longer for patients without nodal disease (35 vs. 11 months; p = 0.01). Hematotoxicity was grade 3 in 11/50, and grade 4 in 1/50 patients. Four percent of higher-grade nausea or vomiting occurred. Esophageal late toxicity was grade 3 in 9/50 patients, and grade 4 in 2/50 patients. CONCLUSION: Survival was excellent especially for patients without nodal disease in this dose-intensified schedule with acceptable tolerability.     

Differential effects of CLDR and PDR brachytherapy on cell cycle progression in a syngeneic rat prostate tumour model

PURPOSE: The study consisted of two treatment arms comparing the effects of CLDR (continuous low dose rate) and PDR (pulsed dose rate) brachytherapy on cell cycle progression in a radioresistant rat prostate tumour model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interstitial PDR and CLDR brachytherapy (both 192-Ir, 0.75 Gy/h) were administered to Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 carcinomas transplanted subcutaneously into the thigh of Copenhagen rats. Increasing doses of up to 20 as well as up to 40 Gy were applied. Cell cycle distributions of the aneuploid tumour cell subpopulations were determined at 4 h (3 Gy), 24 h (18 Gy), 48 h (20 and 36 Gy), as well as during the subsequent redistribution period (20 and 40 Gy) at 72, 96, and 120 h. Tumours either implemented with an empty tubing system (n=5) or under undisturbed growth (n=5) served as controls. Three animals were irradiated per time point and exposure condition. At least two flow cytometrical analyses were carried out per animal. RESULTS: The aneuploid cells possessed a constant DNA-Index of 1.9+/-0.06. In contrast to sham-treated controls, the aneuploid cell fraction with G2/M DNA content was significantly increased (p<0.05) after initiation of both, CLDR and PDR brachytherapy. However, CLDR resulted in an earlier accumulation of tumour cells in G2/M (24 h: 28% CLDR vs. 19% PDR, p<0.05) with a concomitant reduction of cells in G1, whereas PDR yielded delayed, but then more pronounced cell cycle changes, particularly expressed during the redistribution period after both 20 and 40 Gy. CONCLUSION: CLDR and PDR brachytherapy showed differential effects on cell cycle progression. The induction of a significantly earlier but also less persistent G2/M cell cycle arrest after CLDR compared to PDR brachytherapy implies that a substantially higher fraction of tumour cells are irradiated in G2/M after CLDR.     

Role of Interstitial PDR Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of pulsed-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (PDR IBT) in patients with head-and-neck malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1997 to December 2003, 236 patients underwent PDR IBT for head-and-neck cancer at the authors' department. 192 patients received brachytherapy as part of their curative treatment regimen after minimal non-mutilating surgery, 44 patients were treated with irradiation alone. 144 patients had sole IBT (median D(REF) = 56 Gy), in 92 patients IBT procedures (median D(REF) = 24 Gy) were performed in combination with external irradiation. The pulses (0.4-0.7 Gy/h) were delivered 24 h a day with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses. The analysis of tumor control, survival and treatment-related toxicity was performed after a median follow-up of 26 months (6-75 months). RESULTS: At the time of analysis permanent local tumor control was registered in 208 of 236 patients (88%). At 5 years overall survival and local recurrence-free survival of the entire group were 82-73% and 93-83% for T1/2, and 56% and 83% for T3/4, respectively. Soft-tissue necrosis was seen in 23/236 patients (9.7%) and bone necrosis in 17/236 patients (7.2%). No other serious side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: PDR IBT with 0.4-0.7 Gy/h and 1 h between pulses is safe and effective. These results confirm that PDR IBT of head-and-neck cancer is comparable with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy - equally effective and less toxic.     

Pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE: We attempted in our clinic to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a simultaneous application of a cis-platinum-based chemotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia to interstitial pulsed-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1999 and September 2001, 15 patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer were treated with PDR brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and interstitial hyperthermia. All patients had received prior radiation therapy. A dose per pulse of 0.46 to 0.55 Gy was given up to a median total dose of 55 Gy. Simultaneously to the PDR brachytherapy, chemotherapy was given with cis-platinum 20 mg/m2 as a short i.v. infusion each day and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 by continuous infusion from Day 1 to Day 5. After the PDR brachytherapy was finished, all patients were treated with a single session of interstitial hyperthermia. RESULTS: All the patients could receive the whole treatment. After treatment, only mild oral mucositis occurred. One patient developed soft tissue ulceration. None of the patients developed osteoradionecrosis. After a median follow-up of 6 months, the local tumor control rate was 80% (12 of 15), and the 2-year overall survival was 67% (10 of 15). CONCLUSIONS: The intensification of the interstitial PDR brachytherapy with chemotherapy and hyperthermia is feasible and safe, and the preliminary results are encouraging.     

Re-irradiation with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for unresectable recurrent head and neck carcinoma

PurposeTo assess the long-term results of protocol-based interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy combined with simultaneous chemotherapy in selected patients with recurrent head and neck tumors not amenable to salvage surgery.Methods and MaterialsA total of 51 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer were treated with interstitial PDR brachytherapy. Forty patients (78%) had salvage brachytherapy alone using a median total dose of 60 Gy. Salvage brachytherapy in combination with external beam therapy was performed in 11 patients (22%) using a median total dose of D_REF = 27 Gy. Simultaneously with the PDR brachytherapy, a concomitant chemotherapy was administered in 35/51 (69%) of patients. The analysis was performed after a median followup of 58 months.ResultsLocal control rates calculated according to Kaplan–Meier after 2 and 5 years were 71% and 57%, respectively. Comparing results of salvage PDR brachytherapy with or without simultaneous chemotherapy, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 78.9% vs. 38.5% (p = 0.01), respectively. No other patient or treatment-related parameters had a significant influence on treatment results. A total of 9/51 (17.7%) and 6/51 (11.8%) patients developed soft-tissue necrosis or bone necrosis, respectively, but only 2% of patients required surgical treatment.ConclusionsPDR interstitial brachytherapy with pulse doses between 0.4 and 0.7 Gy/h/24 h with simultaneous chemotherapy is an effective and safe option for curative therapy in selected patients with head and neck cancer in previously irradiated areas, which are not suitable for salvage surgery.     

High-Dose-Rate (HDR) or Pulsed-Dose-Rate (PDR) Perioperative Interstitial Intensity-Modulated Brachytherapy (IMBT) for Local Recurrences of Previously Irradiated Breast or Thoracic Wall Following Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: In patients receiving salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy for a local recurrence on the chest wall or in the previously treated breast, clinical outcome and benefit were investigated. All patients had previously been treated with full-dose adjuvant external-beam irradiation (EBRT). Disease-free interval after salvage treatment, local tumor control and side effects were analyzed retrospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, a total of 32 consecutive patients were treated. 13 patients initially treated with mastectomy and postoperative irradiation and 19 patients initially treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative irradiation developed a local recurrence. The mean dose of previous radiation therapy was 58 Gy (range, 42-64 Gy), applied by conventional fractionation. After implantation +/- surgery of recurrent disease and CT-based 3-D planning, 15 patients were irradiated with HDR-IMBT (intensity-modulated brachytherapy) with a mean dose of 28 Gy (range, 10-30 Gy, 2 x 2.5 Gy/day at 6-h daily interfraction interval) and 17 patients received PDR-IMBT with a mean dose 30 Gy (range, 10-45 Gy, 5 x 1 Gy/day at 2-h pulse intervals). Four patients underwent additional EBRT using a dose of 24-40 Gy electrons. Treatment was performed only on working days. RESULTS: After a mean post-implant follow-up of 19 months (range, 1-83 months), no signs of local recurrence were observed in 20 of the 32 patients. In twelve patients, local recurrence occurred after a mean follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-78 months). 20 of the 32 patients experienced an additional systemic progress. In one patient, an EORTC/RTOG grade 3 side effect (ulceration of the skin) was described, which was followed by a local recurrence 12 months posttherapeutically. CONCLUSION: Perioperative interstitial HDR/PDR-IMBT of localized breast or thoracic wall recurrences following previous full-dose EBRT appears to be a meaningful salvage treatment with acceptable toxicity.     

High dose rate (192)Ir afterloading brachytherapy for cancer of the vagina

We report results of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the vagina, utilizing a Nucletron high dose rate system for Delclos Vaginal Applicators (cylinder) and Syed Template Applicators (interstitial). The linear quadratic (LQ) model was used to determine the optimum time-dose-fractionation schedules. Interstitial doses were determined at the isodose line that included gross tumour. Cylinder doses were determined either at the vaginal surface (5 cases), at 0.5 cm depth (5 cases), or at 1.0 cm depth (1 case). For the first treatment (n=19), interstitial templates were utilized in 8 patients and vaginal cylinders in 11. 11 patients received second treatments: 6 templates and 5 cylinders. The median dose of external beam radiation (n=15) was 40.0 Gy followed, after a median 23 day interval, by high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) of 4 fractions in 30-42 h; then a median interval gap of 25 days, followed by repeat HDRB. The median total fractionated HDRB dose per patient was 23.0 Gy (range: 6.9 Gy to 40.4 Gy; calculated low dose rate equivalent of 29.8 Gy). Tumour histologies included 14 squamous cell carcinomas, 2 adenocarcinomas, 2 melanomas, and 1 small cell tumour. Three patients experienced early brachytherapy-related complications (diarrhoea, dysuria and labial dermatitis). Three patients (15.8%) developed serious/late complications including ureteral stenosis, painful vaginal necrosis and small bowel obstruction. The first of these patients received 2 templates, the second a cylinder followed by a template and a cylinder, and the third a single cylinder. The 2 year progression-free survival was 39.3% (median 15.7 months), while the 2 year overall survival was 66.1% (median 29.9 months). (192)Ir afterloading HDRB is a feasible approach to women with vaginal cancer with acceptable toxicity and tumour response. Potential advantages include patient preference, outpatient cost-effectiveness in the case of cylinder technique, and no radiation exposure to hospital personnel. Long-term follow-up is needed to further assess late complications, and larger studies are needed to confirm our results.     

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.     

The effects of edema on urethral dose following palladium-103 prostate brachytherapy.

The effects of edema on urethral dose after interstitial prostate brachytherapy with palladium-103 (103Pd) were studied. Fifty patients underwent a 90-Gy 103Pd implant followed by dosimetric computed tomography (CT). Twenty-one days later, a Foley catheter was reinserted and a dosimetric CT was repeated. The mean reduction in prostate volume between day 0 and day 21 was 16%. Median prostate D90 on day 0 was 89.7 Gy (range 59.5 to 127) and 99.5 Gy (range 62.5 to 130) on day 21. Median prostate V100 was 90% (range 63 to 98%) on day 0 and 96% (range 66 to 99%) on day 21. Median V150 was 61% (range 31 to 85%) on day 0 and 75% (range 39 to 93%) on day 21. Median urethral D50 was 107 Gy (range 57 to 201) on day 0 and 126 Gy (range 64 to 193) on day 21. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the decrease in the prostate volume and the increased urethral D50 (r 0.58, p < 0.05). Acute urinary toxicity was 32% grade 0, 38% grade 1, and 30% grade 2. The median urethral D50 increased by a mean of 18% with a correlation coefficient of 0.58 (p < 0.05). Catheterization of the urethra was well tolerated and was of value in better characterizing urethral dose after 103Pd brachytherapy.     

3-D Conformal HDR Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: Pilot study to evaluate feasibility, acute toxicity and conformal quality of three-dimensional (3-D) conformal high-dose- rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer using intraoperative real-time planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 05/2002 and 05/2003, 52 patients with prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/ml, Gleason score < or = 7 and clinical stage < or = T2a were treated. Median PSA was 6.4 ng/ml and median Gleason score 5. 24/52 patients had stage T1c and 28/52 stage T2a. For transrectal ultrasound-(TRUS-)guided transperineal implantation of flexible plastic needles into the prostate, the real-time HDR planning system SWIFT((R)) was used. After implantation, CT-based 3-D postplanning was performed. All patients received one implant for four fractions of HDR brachytherapy in 48 h using a reference dose (D(ref)) of 9.5 Gy to a total dose of 38.0 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed to evaluate the conformal quality of each implant using D(90), D(10) urethra, and D(10) rectum. Acute toxicity was evaluated using the CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) scales. RESULTS: Median D(90) was 106% of D(ref) (range: 93-115%), median D(10) urethra 159% of D(ref) (range: 127-192%), and median D(10) rectum 55% of D(ref) (range: 35-68%). Median follow-up is currently 8 months. In 2/52 patients acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was observed. No gastrointestinal toxicity > grade 1 occurred. CONCLUSION: 3-D conformal HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy using intraoperative real-time planning is a feasible and highly conformal treatment for localized prostate cancer associated with minimal acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and biochemical control.     

Transperineal Low-Dose Rate Iridium-192 Interstitial Brachytherapy in Cervical Carcinoma Stage IIB

PURPOSE: To assess local control, survival and complications in patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB treated radically with transperineal Iridium-192 low-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy following external beam radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 65 women (age 25-70 years, mean 47 years) with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB were initially treated with external beam radiotherapy on a telecobalt or 6 MV linear accelerator to a dose of 50 Gy delivered in 5-6 weeks. After 2-3 weeks of completing external radiation, patients received interstitial brachytherapy with Iridium-192 (activity 0.5-1 mCi/cm) using a Syed-Neblett perineal template. The median dose delivered to the implant volume was 24 Gy (range 20-32 Gy) delivered at an average dose rate of 0.70 Gy/h (range 0.40-1.20 Gy/h). A point defined at 1.5 cm lateral to the central uterine tandem at the level of os was taken as a representative for assessing the dose to the cervix. Mean doses delivered by interstitial brachytherapy to point A, cervix, point B and rectum were 38 Gy, 34 Gy, 16 Gy and 16 Gy, respectively. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 53 months, the actuarial disease free survival and overall survival for 65 patients at both 5 and 10 years was 64% and 44%, respectively. Response to radiotherapy was a strong predictor of local control with 82% of patients continuing to have pelvic control after initial complete response. Overall, nine (14%) patients had persistent disease, ten (15%) developed a central recurrence after initial control and three patients developed distant metastasis on follow-up. No patient had any immediate treatment-related complication. Late toxicity included grade I-II rectal reactions in five patients and grade IV bladder complication (vesico-vaginal fistula) in two patients. 5 years after treatment, one patient developed intestinal obstruction, which was relieved after conservative management. Two patients developed vaginal stenosis. The 5- and 10-year disease free survival was 48% in patients aged less than 45 years as compared to 80% in patients of more than 45 years (p = 0.009). Dose to the cervical point was a prognostic indicator with 5- and 10-year disease free survival of 47% in patients who received < 35 Gy in comparison to 80% in patients who had > 35 Gy (p = 0.03). There was no difference in local control and survival in patients with minimal and moderate parametrial involvement. Bulky disease (> 4 cm) at presentation and a longer gap between external radiation and brachytherapy showed a trend towards inferior local control. CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy after external beam irradiation in patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB results in acceptable local control, survival and complication rates. Increased dose to the cervical disease results in improved local control and survival and should therefore be considered while optimizing brachytherapy treatment plans. Comparison of the results with those of standard intracavitary therapy remains to be proven in a randomized trial.     

High-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in previously irradiated patients

PurposePreoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) endorectal brachytherapy is well tolerated among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, these studies excluded patients who previously received pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Because a favorable toxicity profile has been published for HDR endorectal brachytherapy, we evaluated this technique in patients who have previously received pelvic irradiation.Methods and MaterialsWe included patients who had received pelvic irradiation for a previous pelvic malignancy and later received preoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer. Brachytherapy was delivered to a total dose of 26 Gy in 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions.ResultsWe evaluated 10 patients who previously received pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (n=6), EBRT and brachytherapy (n=2), or brachytherapy alone (n=2). The median interval between the initial course of RT and endorectal brachytherapy was approximately 11 years (range, 1-19 years). Two patients experienced a complete pathologic response while 1 patient had a near complete pathologic response. No acute grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. No intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications were observed.ConclusionsPreoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy is an alternative to EBRT for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have previously received pelvic RT.     

Feasibility and Early Results of Interstitial Intensity-Modulated HDR/PDR Brachytherapy (IMBT) with/without Complementary External-Beam Radiotherapy and Extended Surgery in Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: A new multimodality treatment concept consisting of extended resection and postoperative fractionated intensity-modulated interstitial brachytherapy (IMBT) was introduced for pelvic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 46 patients received extended resection and single plastic tubes were sutured directly onto the tumor bed. IMBT was started within 2 weeks postoperatively with a median dose of 24.5 Gy (5-35 Gy). Patients were treated either with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR; n = 23) or with pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR; n = 23). 25 patients received complementary 45-Gy external-beam irradiation (EBRT) to the pelvic region after explanting the plastic tubes. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20.6 months (7-107 months) and mean patient survival 25.7 +/- 25.8 months (median 17, range 1-107 months). After 5 years overall survival, disease-free survival and local control rate were 23%, 20% and 33%, significantly influenced by the resectional state. There was a trend in favor of PDR compared to HDR, which reached statistical significance in patients who had not received additional EBRT. CONCLUSION: The combination of extended surgery and postoperative interstitial IMBT is feasible and offers effective interdisciplinary treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer. In this small and inhomogeneous cohort of patients PDR seems to be more effective than HDR, particularly when application of complementary EBRT is not possible. None of the patients who required resection of distant metastasis survived > 2 years in this study.