The pharmacokinetics of oxybutynin is unaffected by gender and contraceptive steroids

Objective and methods: The effect of gender and concomitant use of contraceptive steroids on the absorption and metabolism of oxybutynin was investigated in 49 healthy volunteers, 24 females and 25 males. Serum concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, were measured for up to 48 h after ingestion of a single dose of 10 mg oxybutynin. Results: Intake of oral contraceptive steroids had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of oxybutynin or its metabolite. Both in males and females, the mean area under the curve (AUC_0–t) of N-desethyloxybutynin was about 13 times higher and the peak concentration (C_max) 15 to 19 times higher than the AUC_0–t and C_max of the parent oxybutynin, with no significant differences between males and females. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics of orally administered oxybutynin shows a considerable interindividual variability, but is unaffected by gender and use of contraceptive steroids. Received: 21 May 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 4 August 1997     

Effect of itraconazole on cerivastatin pharmacokinetics

Objective: To determine the effects of itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin, a competitive 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study design with two phases, which were separated by a wash-out period of 4 weeks, was used. In each phase ten healthy volunteers took 200 mg itraconazole or matched placebo orally once daily for 4 days according to a randomization schedule. On day 4, 0.3 mg cerivastatin was administered orally. Serum concentrations of cerivastatin, its major metabolites, active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole were measured up to 24 h. Results: Itraconazole increased the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_0–∞) of the parent cerivastatin by 15% (P < 0.05). The mean peak serum concentration (C_max) of cerivastatin lactone was increased 1.8-fold (range 1.1-fold to 2.4-fold, P < 0.001) and the AUC_0–24 h 2.6-fold (range 2.0-fold to 3.6-fold, P < 0.001) by itraconazole. The elimination half-life (t_1/2) of cerivastatin lactone was increased 3.2-fold (P < 0.001). Itraconazole decreased the AUC_0–24 h of the active M-1 metabolite of cerivastatin by 28% (P < 0.05), whereas the AUC_0–24 h of the more active metabolite, M-23, was increased by 36% (P < 0.05). The AUC_0–24 h and t_1/2 of active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were increased by 27% (P < 0.05) and 40% (P < 0.05), respectively, by itraconazole. Conclusions: Itraconazole has a modest interaction with cerivastatin. Inhibition of the CYP3A4-mediated M-1 metabolic pathway leads to elevated serum concentrations of cerivastatin, cerivastatin lactone and metabolite M-23, resulting in increased concentrations of active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Received: 28 June 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 10 October 1998     

Fluconazole but not itraconazole decreases the metabolism of losartan to E-3174

Objective: Losartan is metabolised to its active metabolite E-3174 by CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 in vitro. Itraconazole is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, whereas fluconazole affects CYP2C9 more than CYP3A4. We wanted to study the possible interaction of these antimycotics with losartan in healthy volunteers. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, three-phase crossover study design was used. Eleven healthy volunteers ingested orally, once a day for 4 days, either itraconazole 200 mg, fluconazole (400 mg on day 1 and 200 mg on days 2–4) or placebo (control). On day 4, a single 50-mg oral dose of losartan was ingested. Plasma concentrations of losartan, E-3174, itraconazole, hydroxy-itraconazole and fluconazole were determined over 24 h. The blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded over 24 h. Results: The mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the curve [AUC(0∞)] of E-3174 were significantly decreased by fluconazole to 30% and to 47% of their control values, respectively, and the t_1/2 was increased to 167%. Fluconazole caused only a nonsignificant increase (23–41%) in the AUC and t_1/2 of the unchanged losartan. Itraconazole had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic variables of losartan or E-3174. The ratio AUC(0∞)_E-3174/AUC(0∞)_losartan was 60% smaller during the fluconazole than during the placebo and itraconazole phases. No clinically significant changes in the effects of losartan on blood pressure and heart rate were observed between fluconazole, itraconazole and placebo phases. Conclusion: Fluconazole but not itraconazole interacts with losartan by inhibiting its metabolism to the active metabolite E-3174. This implicates that, in man, CYP2C9 is a major enzyme for the formation of E-3174 from losartan. The clinical significance of the fluconazole–losartan interaction is unclear, but the possibility of a decreased therapeutic effect of losartan should be kept in mind. Received: 4 June 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 10 September 1997     

Itraconazole,gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide

Objective Loperamide is biotransformed in vitro by the cytochromes P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 3A4 and is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein efflux transporter. Our aim was to investigate the effects of itraconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and gemfibrozil, an inhibitor of CYP2C8, on the pharmacokinetics of loperamide.Methods In a randomized crossover study with 4 phases, 12 healthy volunteers took 100 mg itraconazole (first dose 200 mg), 600 mg gemfibrozil, both itraconazole and gemfibrozil, or placebo, twice daily for 5 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 4-mg dose of loperamide. Loperamide and N-desmethylloperamide concentrations in plasma were measured for up to 72 h and in urine for up to 48 h. Possible central nervous system effects of loperamide were assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and by subjective drowsiness.Results Itraconazole raised the peak plasma loperamide concentration (C_max) 2.9-fold (range, 1.2–5.0; P<0.001) and the total area under the plasma loperamide concentration-time curve (AUC_0-∞) 3.8-fold (1.4–6.6; P<0.001) and prolonged the elimination half-life (t_½) of loperamide from 11.9 to 18.7 h (P<0.001). Gemfibrozil raised the C_max of loperamide 1.6-fold (0.9–3.2; P<0.05) and its AUC_0-∞ 2.2-fold (1.0–3.7; P<0.05) and prolonged its t_½ to 16.7 h (P<0.01). The combination of itraconazole and gemfibrozil raised the C_max of loperamide 4.2-fold (1.5–8.7; P<0.001) and its AUC_0-∞ 12.6-fold (4.3–21.8; P<0.001) and prolonged the t_½ of loperamide to 36.9 h (P<0.001). The amount of loperamide excreted into urine within 48 h was increased 3.0-fold, 1.4-fold and 5.3-fold by itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination, respectively (P<0.05). Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination reduced the plasma AUC_0–72 ratio of N-desmethylloperamide to loperamide by 65%, 46% and 88%, respectively (P<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test or subjective drowsiness between the phases.Conclusion Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide. Although not seen in the psychomotor tests used, an increased risk of adverse effects should be considered during concomitant use of loperamide with itraconazole, gemfibrozil and especially their combination.     

Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem

Objective: Zolpidem is a short-acting␣imidazopyridine hypnotic which is biotransformed in humans mainly by CYP3A4. Itraconazole strongly interacts with many substrates of CYP3A4 such as midazolam and triazolam. In this study, the effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem was investigated to uncover a possible clinically significant interaction. Methods: In a randomized cross-over study with two phases, ten healthy volunteers took either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo once daily for 4 days. A single oral dose of 10 mg zolpidem was given on day 4. Plasma drug concentrations were measured up to 17 h and effects of zolpidem up to 9 h after the ingestion of zolpidem. Results: Itraconazole had no marked effects on the pharmacokinetics of zolpidem; the total area under the plasma zolpidem concentration–time curve (AUC_0–∞) was 34% larger during the itraconazole phase (759 ng · h · ml⁻¹) than during the placebo phase (567 ng · h · ml⁻¹). Exophoria of the eyes by the Maddox wing test was significantly increased by itraconazole, but the results of the digit symbol substitution test, critical flicker fusion test, postural sway tests and the visual analogue scale tests for subjective drowsiness and overall drug effect did not differ between the phases. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem were not remarkably affected by itraconazole in healthy volunteers. Therefore, unlike triazolam, for example, zolpidem can be used in normal or nearly normal doses together with itraconazole and probably also with other CYP3A4 inhibitors. Received: 30 September 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 12 January 1998     

Effect of erythromycin and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous lignocaine

Objective: We have studied the possible interaction of erythromycin and itraconazole, both inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4), with intravenous lignocaine in nine healthy volunteers using a randomized cross-over study design. Methods: The subjects were given oral placebo, erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) or itraconazole (200 mg once a day) for 4 days. Intravenous lignocaine 1.5 mg · kg⁻¹ was given with an infusion for 60 min on the fourth day of pretreatment with placebo, erythromycin or itraconazole. Timed plasma samples were collected until 11 h. The concentrations of lignocaine and its metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) were measured by gas chromatography. Results: The area under the lignocaine concentration-time curve was similar during all three phases but erythromycin significantly increased the elimination half-life of lignocaine from 2.5 to 2.9 (0.7) h compared with placebo. Following itraconazole administration, t_1/2 was 2.6 h. The values for plasma clearance and volume of distribution at steady state were similar during all the phases. Compared with placebo and itraconazole, erythromycin significantly increased MEGX peak concentrations by approximately 40% and AUC_(0–11 h) by 45–60%. Conclusion: The plasma decay of lignocaine administered intravenously is virtually unaffected by the concomitant administration of erythromycin and itraconazole. However, erythromycin increases the concentrations of MEGX, which indicates that erythromycin either increases the relative amount of lignocaine metabolized via N-de-ethylation or decreases the further metabolism of MEGX. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the clinical significance of the erythromycin-induced elevated concentrations of MEGX during prolonged intravenous infusions of lignocaine. Received: 8 January 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 8 June 1998     

The effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral prednisolone

Objective: To examine the possible effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered prednisolone. Methods: In this double-blind, randomised, two-phase cross-over study, ten healthy subjects received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, 20 mg prednisolone was given orally. Plasma concentrations of prednisolone, cortisol, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole were determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography up to 47 h. Results: Itraconazole increased the total area under the plasma prednisolone concentration–time curve by 24% (P < 0.001) and the elimination half-life of prednisolone by 29% (P < 0.001) compared with placebo. The peak plasma concentration and time to the peak of prednisolone were not affected by itraconazole. The mean morning plasma cortisol concentration, measured 23 h after the ingestion of prednisolone, during the itraconazole phase was 73% of that during the placebo phase (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The observed minor interaction between itraconazole and oral prednisolone is probably of limited clinical significance. The susceptibility of prednisolone to interact with CYP3A4 inhibitors is considerably smaller than that of methylprednisolone, and itraconazole and probably also other inhibitors of CYP3A4 can be used concomitantly with prednisolone without marked changes in the effects of this corticosteroid. Received: 4 October 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 29 November 1999     

Serum concentrations of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine are unaffected by the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole

Objective: We studied a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between clozapine and itraconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor. Methods: A double-blind randomized study design was used. Seven schizophrenic inpatients volunteered to receive, in addition to their previous drug regimen, either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo for 7 days. For the next 7 days, itraconazole was changed to placebo and vice versa. Serum concentrations of clozapine and its main metabolite desmethylclozapine were measured on days 0, 3, 7, 10 and 14. Results: Concomitant administration of itraconazole had no significant effect on serum concentrations of clozapine or desmethylclozapine. Conclusion: CYP3A4 seems to be of minor importance in clozapine metabolism in humans. Itraconazole, and probably also other inhibitors of CYP3A4, can be used concomitantly with clozapine. Received: 8 August 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 14 December 1997     

Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zopiclone

Objective: We studied the possible interaction between itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A, and zopiclone, a short-acting hypnotic. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover design was used. Ten healthy young subjects received daily either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo for 4 days. On day 4 they ingested a single 7.5-mg oral dose of zopiclone. Plasma concentrations of zopiclone and itraconazole were determined and pharmacodynamic responses were measured up to 17 h. Results: Itraconazole significantly increased the C_max of zopiclone from 49 to 63 ng ⋅ ml⁻¹. The t_1/2 of zopiclone was prolonged from 5.0 to 7.0 h. The AUC(0–∞) of zopiclone was increased from 415 to 719 ng ⋅ ml⁻¹ h by itraconazole. No statistically significant differences were observed in the pharmacodynamic responses between the groups. Conclusion: Itraconazole has a statistically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with zopiclone but this is only of limited clinical importance, at least in young adults. Received: 15 April 1996 /Accepted in revised form: 4 June 1996     

The area under the plasma concentration–time curve for oral midazolam is 400-fold larger during treatment with itraconazole than with rifampicin

Objective: To determine the effects of treatment with itraconazole and rifampicin (rifampin) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral midazolam during and 4 days after the end of the treatment. Methods: Nine healthy volunteers received itraconazole (200 mg daily) for 4 days and, 2 weeks later, rifampicin (600 mg daily) for 5 days. In addition, they ingested 15 mg midazolam before the first treatment, 7.5 mg on␣the␣last day of itraconazole administration, and 4 days␣later,␣and 15 mg 1 day and 4 days after the last dose␣of␣rifampicin.␣The disposition of midazolam and its α-hydroxy metabolite was determined and its pharmacodynamic effects were measured. Results: During itraconazole treatment, or 4 days after, α-hydroxymetabolite the dose-corrected area under the plasma midazolam concentration–time curve (AUC_0–∞) was 8- or 2.6-fold larger than that before itraconazole (i.e. 1707 or 695 versus 277 ng · h · ml⁻¹), respectively. One day after rifampicin treatment, the AUC_0–∞ of midazolam was 2.3% (i.e. 4.4 ng · h · ml⁻¹) of the before-treatment value and only 0.26% of its value during itraconazole treatment; 4 days after rifampicin, the AUC_0–∞ was still only 13% (i.e. 27.1 ng · h · ml⁻¹) of the before-treatment value. The peak concentration and elimination half-life of midazolam were also increased by itraconazole and decreased by rifampicin. The ratio of plasma α-hydroxymidazolam to midazolam was greatly decreased by itraconazole and increased by rifampicin. In addition, the effects of midazolam were greater during itraconazole and smaller 1 day after rifampicin than without treatment. Conclusion: Switching from inhibition to induction of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes causes a very great (400-fold) change in the AUC of oral midazolam. During oral administration of CYP3A substrates that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism, similar changes in pharmacokinetics are expected to occur when potent inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A are added to the treatment. After cessation of treatment with itraconazole or rifampicin, the risk of significant interaction continues up to at least 4 days, probably even longer. Received: 17 June 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 16 October 1997     

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole

Objective: To investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole. Methods: Eleven healthy volunteers received a single dose of oral itraconazole (200 mg) on days 1 and 15 and oral omeprazole (40 mg) once daily from day 2 to day 15. Itraconazole pharmacokinetics were studied on days 1 and 15. Results: Concentrations of itraconazole were higher when it was taken alone than when it was taken with omeprazole. With concomitant omeprazole treatment, the mean AUC_0–24 and C_max of itraconazole were significantly reduced by 64% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion: Omeprazole affects itraconazole kinetics, leading to a reduction in bioavailability and C_max. These two drugs should not be used together. Received: 12 November 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 13 January 1998     

Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in normal volunteers and AIDS patients

Objective: To investigate the effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in humans. Methods: Our study was conducted with six healthy normal volunteers and three AIDS patients. All subjects received a 200 mg single dose of oral itraconazole on day 1 and day 15 and 600 mg of oral rifampicin once daily from day 2 to day 15. Itraconazole pharmacokinetics studies were carried out on day 1 (phase 1) and day 15 (phase 2). The limit of detection for itraconazole concentration was 16 ng · ml^–1. Results: Concentrations itraconazole were higher when it was administered alone than when it was administered with rifampicin. Coadministration of rifampicin resulted in undetectable levels of itraconazole in all subjects except one normal volunteer. The mean AUC_0–24 was 3.28 vs 0.39 μg · h · ml⁻¹ in phase 1 and 2, respectively, in healthy normal volunteers. Therefore, the estimated minimum decrease of the mean AUC_0–24 of itraconazole in phase 2 was approximately 88% compared with phase 1. The mean AUC_0–24 was 1.07 vs 0.38 μg · h · ml^–1 in phase 1 and 2, respectively, in AIDS patients. Therefore, the estimated minimum decrease of the mean AUC_0–24 of itraconazole in phase 2 was approximately 64% compared with phase 1. Conclusion: Rifampicin has a very strong inducing effect on the metabolism of itraconazole, so that these two drugs should not be administered concomitantly. Received: 2 September 1997/Accepted in revised form: 16 December 1997     

Effect of fluconazole on plasma fluvastatin and pravastatin concentrations

Objective: To study the effects of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin and pravastatin, two inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. Methods: Two separate randomised, double-blind, two-phase, crossover studies with identical study design were carried out. In each study, 12 healthy volunteers were given a 4-day pretreatment with oral fluconazole (400 mg on day 1 and 200 mg on days 2–4) or placebo, according to a randomisation schedule. On day 4, a single oral dose of 40 mg fluvastatin (study I) or 40 mg pravastatin (study II) was administered orally. Plasma concentrations of fluvastatin, pravastatin and fluconazole were measured over 24 h. Results: In study I, fluconazole increased the mean area under the plasma fluvastatin concentration–time curve (AUC_0–∞) by 84% (P < 0.01), the mean elimination half-life (t _1/2) of fluvastatin by 80% (P < 0.01) and its mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) by 44% (P < 0.05). In study II, fluconazole had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin. Conclusions: Fluconazole has a significant interaction with fluvastatin. The mechanism of the increased plasma concentrations and prolonged elimination of fluvastatin is probably inhibition of the CYP2C9-mediated metabolism of fluvastatin by fluconazole. Care should be taken if fluconazole or other potent inhibitors of CYP2C9 are prescribed to patients using fluvastatin. However, pravastatin is not susceptible to interactions with fluconazole or other potent CYP2C9 inhibitors. Received: 25 October 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 9 March 2000     

Stereoselective interaction between the CYP2C8 inhibitor gemfibrozil and racemic ibuprofen

Objective Ibuprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, is metabolised in vitro by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 2C9. We studied the possible effect of gemfibrozil, an in vivo inhibitor of CYP2C8, on the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in healthy volunteers. Methods In a randomised two-phase crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers took 600 mg gemfibrozil or placebo orally twice daily for 3 days. On day 3, each subject ingested 400 mg of racemic ibuprofen. Plasma concentrations of ibuprofen enantiomers and gemfibrozil were measured. Results Gemfibrozil raised the mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0–∞) of R-ibuprofen by 34% (range −10 to 67%; P < 0.001). The elimination half-lives (t _1/2) of R- and S-ibuprofen were increased by 54 and 34% (range 11–162% and 16–85%; P < 0.001) respectively. The other pharmacokinetic variables of R- and S-ibuprofen were not changed significantly. The AUC_0–∞ ratio of R-ibuprofen to S-ibuprofen was increased by gemfibrozil (P < 0.001). Conclusions Gemfibrozil moderately increases the AUC_0–∞ of R-ibuprofen and prolongs its t _1/2, indicating that R-ibuprofen is partially metabolised by CYP2C8. The interconversion of R- to S-ibuprofen can explain the small effect of gemfibrozil on the t _1/2 of S-ibuprofen. The gemfibrozil-ibuprofen interaction is of limited clinical significance.     

CYP3A but not P‐gp plays a relevant role in the in vivo intestinal and hepatic clearance of the delta‐specific phosphoinositide‐3 kinase inhibitor leniolisib

This study investigated the effect of itraconazole, a strong dual inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp), on the single dose pharmacokinetics of leniolisib. In order to differentiate the specific contribution of CYP3A from P‐gp, the potential interaction with quinidine, a strong inhibitor of P‐gp but not CYP3A, was studied as well. Using a fixed‐sequence, 3‐way crossover design, 20 healthy male subjects received single oral doses of 10 mg leniolisib during three phases separated by a washout: (1) leniolisib alone, (2) 200 mg itraconazole once daily for 9 days plus leniolisib on day 5, and (3) 300 mg quinidine administered 1 h before and 3 h after leniolisib. Itraconazole increased the leniolisib oral drug exposure (AUC_inf) by on average 2.1‐fold, whereas the peak drug concentration (C_max) was less impacted (1.25‐fold). The terminal elimination half‐life (T_1/2) of leniolisib was also increased by ~2‐fold. Neither oral AUC_inf nor C_max or T_1/2 was found to be altered by quinidine. These findings suggest that the interaction with itraconazole occurred mainly systemically through inhibition of CYP3A, and corroborate our in vitro findings that leniolisib is neither a sensitive CYP3A substrate nor a relevant in vivo substrate for intestinal or hepatic P‐gp. Assuming itraconazole levels achieved complete inhibition of CYP3A, the fractional contribution of CYP3A to the overall disposition of leniolisib is estimated to be about 50%. The concomitant use of leniolisib with strong inhibitors of CYP3A as well as strong and moderate inducers of CYP3A is best avoided.     

Effect of route of administration of fluconazole on the interaction between fluconazole and midazolam

Objective: Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine hypnotic extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 enzyme. Orally ingested azole antimycotics, including fluconazole, interfere with the metabolism of oral midazolam during its absorption and elimination phases. We compared the effect of oral and intravenous fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally ingested midazolam. Methods: A double-dummy, randomized, cross-over study in three phases was performed in 9 healthy volunteers. The subjects were given orally fluconazole 400 mg and intravenously saline within 60 min; orally placebo and intravenously fluconazole 400 mg; and orally placebo and intravenously saline. An oral dose of 7.5 mg midazolam was ingested 60 min after oral intake of fluconazole/placebo, i.e. at the end of the corresponding infusion. Plasma concentrations of midazolam, α-hydroxymidazolam and fluconazole were determined and pharmacodynamic effects were measured up to 17 h. Results: Both oral and intravenous fluconazole significantly increased the area under the midazolam plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0–3, AUC_0–17) 2- to 3-fold, the elimination half-life of midazolam 2.5-fold and its peak concentration (C_max) 2- to 2.5-fold compared with placebo. The AUC_0–3 and the C_max of midazolam were significantly higher after oral than after intravenous administration of fluconazole. Both oral and intravenous fluconazole increased the pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam but no differences were detected between the fluconazole phases. Conclusion: We conclude that the metabolism of orally␣administered midazolam was more strongly inhibited by oral than by intravenous administration of fluconazole. Received: 1 July 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 4 September 1996     

Estimation of CYP2C19 activity by the omeprazole hydroxylation index at a single point in time after intravenous and oral administration

Objective The purpose of this study was to identify the common time point to achieve hydroxylation index (HI: omeprazole plasma concentration/5-hydroxyomeprazole plasma concentration) reflecting AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ after intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) administration. Methods Twenty young and 28 elderly healthy subjects, including different CYP2C19 genotypes, were enrolled in the study. The young subjects received either 40 mg PO or 20 mg IV omeprazole, whereas the elderly subjects received 10 mg IV. The relation between AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ and HI was determined by Spearman’s rank correlation. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify the common time point to calculate HI that reflects AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ after IV. Results In the correlation between HI and AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ IV at observed time points, HI_3h showed the highest correlation coefficients (r = 0.894, p < 0.001) in all 48 subjects. The correlation of HI between IV and PO at observed time points showed that HI_3h was highest (r = 0.916, p < 0.001) in 20 young subjects. Additionally, there was no significant difference between HI_3h of IV and that of PO (12.9 ± 15.9 and 12.9 ± 15.1, p = 0.997). The regression equation of HI_3h was the best to estimate AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ (AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ = 1.37 • HI_3h + 0.18 • Age – 7.83, r ² = 0.883, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrated that HI_3h after omeprazole IV was able to estimate AUC_OPZ/AUC_5OH-OPZ, as well as HI_3h after PO. Additionally, CYP2C19 activity can be estimated more definitely by using HI after omeprazole IV without intestinal absorption.     

Pharmacokinetic study of the interaction between itraconazole and nevirapine

Objective To investigate the drug interaction potential between itraconazole and nevirapine. Methods Our study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers in two phases. In phase 1 (from days 1–28), all subjects were randomly assigned to a two-way crossover study of a nevirapine regimen (nevirapine 200 mg once daily for 7 days) and an itraconazole regimen (itraconazole 200 mg once daily for 7 days) with a 14-day wash-out period between. Phase 2 (from days 43–49) was performed 14 days after phase 1 ended, and all subjects received a combination regimen (nevirapine 200 mg combined with itraconazole 200 mg once daily for 7 days). Nevirapine pharmacokinetic studies were carried out starting with the seventh dose of nevirapine in the nevirapine regimen (on days 7–10 or 28–31) and the combination regimen (on days 49–52). Itraconazole pharmacokinetic studies were carried out starting with the seventh dose of itraconazole in the itraconazole regimen (on days 7–10 or 28–31) and the combination regimen (on days 49–52). Results There was no significant difference in nevirapine pharmacokinetic parameters between the nevirapine and combination regimens. Itraconazole plasma concentrations were lower when it was administered in the combination regimen than when it was administered in the itraconazole regimen. The mean C_max, AUC_0–96 and t _1/2 of itraconazole were significantly reduced by 38, 61 and 31%, respectively. Conclusion Nevirapine had a strong inducing effect on the metabolism of itraconazole, but there was no significant effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine. However, a higher daily dosage of itraconazole might have an inhibitory effect.     

Grapefruit juice can increase the plasma concentrations of oral methylprednisolone

Objective: To investigate whether the pharmacokinetics of orally administered methylprednisolone and plasma cortisol concentrations are affected by administration of grapefruit juice. Methods: In a randomised, two-phase, cross-over study, ten healthy subjects received either 200 ml double-strength grapefruit juice or water three times a day for 2 days. On day 3, 16 mg methylprednisolone was given orally with 200 ml grapefruit juice or water. Additionally, 200 ml grapefruit juice or water was ingested 0.5 h and 1.5 h after methylprednisolone administration. Plasma concentrations of methylprednisolone and cortisol were determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) over a 47-h period. Results: Grapefruit juice increased the total area under the plasma methylprednisolone concentration–time curve (AUC_0–∞) by 75% (P < 0.001) and the elimination half-life (t _1/2) of methylprednisolone by 35% (P < 0.001). The peak plasma concentration of methylprednisolone (C_max) was increased by 27% (P < 0.01). Grapefruit juice delayed the time to the C_max from 2.0 h to 3.0 h (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the plasma cortisol concentrations, measured after methylprednisolone administration, between the water and grapefruit juice phases. However, grapefruit juice slightly decreased the morning plasma cortisol concentrations before methylprednisolone administration (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Grapefruit juice given in high amounts moderately increases the AUC_0–∞ and t _1/2 of oral methylprednisolone. The increase in t _1/2 suggests that grapefruit juice can affect the systemic methylprednisolone metabolism. The clinical significance of the grapefruit juice–methylprednisolone interaction is small, but in some sensitive subjects high doses of grapefruit juice might enhance the effects of oral methylprednisolone. Received: 17 February 2000 / Accepted in revised form: 9 May 2000     

The effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered verapamil

Objective: To investigate the effect of grapefruit juice (GJ) on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered verapamil in hypertensive patients. Methods: Ten hypertensive patients on chronic verapamil treatment participated in a two-day study. On day 1 200 ml of water was given 1 hour before, and together with the morning verapamil dose; on the day 2, water was replaced by GJ in the same order. Serial blood samples were collected and the concentrations of verapamil and its main dealkylated metabolite (D-617) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The area under the concentration versus time curve of verapamil (AUC_v) and its metabolite D-617 (AUC_M) were calculated before and after GJ ingestion. The peak serum concentration (C_max) and the time until its appearance (t_max) were also determined. Results: GJ did not affect C_max, t_max, AUC_v or AUV_m. The AUC_v/AUC_m ratio (AUC_R) was slightly, but significantly, increased after GJ (1.67 vs 1.92). Conclusions: A single administration of GJ with short-acting verapamil has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics, of verapamil. Received: 2 October 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 2 March 1998