No influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran,the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Following oral administration, ximelagatran undergoes rapid bioconversion to its active form, melagatran, via two minor intermediates. Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2), is a recognised risk factor for thrombosis. There is potential for differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs administered to obese versus non-obese patients, and some drugs may require alternative administration strategies in obese patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an open-label, single-dose, group-matched study in which obese subjects (BMI 32-39 kg/m(2); six male and six female; age 21-40 years) were matched by sex and age (+/-2 years) with non-obese subjects (BMI 21-26 kg/m(2); six male and six female; aged 21-39 years). Each subject received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of melagatran and activated partial thromboplastin times (APTT; a marker of melagatran pharmacodynamics) were collected up to 12 hours after administration. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of melagatran between obese and non-obese subjects. Values of area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time at which C(max) occurred and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 1 micromol. h/L, 0.2 micromol/L, 2 hours and 3 hours in both obese and non-obese subjects, respectively. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the obese and non-obese subjects in the amount of ximelagatran, melagatran or the minor intermediates ethyl-melagatran and melagatran hydroxyamidine excreted in urine. When relating the prolongation of APTT ratio to the square root of plasma concentration of melagatran and obesity status (no/yes), no statistically significant interaction between plasma concentration and obesity status was observed. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both obese and non-obese subjects, and no bleeding events or serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of melagatran were detected between obese and non-obese subjects after oral administration of ximelagatran, suggesting that dose adjustment of ximelagatran in obesity (BMI up to 39 kg/m(2)) is not necessary.     

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in rats, dogs, and humans.

The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, and its active form, melagatran, were separately investigated in rats, dogs, and healthy male human subjects after administration of oral and intravenous (i.v.) single doses. Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and metabolized following oral administration, with melagatran as the predominant compound in plasma. Two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and OH-melagatran) that were subsequently metabolized to melagatran were also identified in plasma and were rapidly eliminated. Melagatran given i.v. had relatively low plasma clearance, small volume of distribution, and short elimination half-life. The oral absorption of melagatran was low and highly variable. It was primarily renally cleared, and the renal clearance agreed well with the glomerular filtration rate. Ximelagatran was extensively metabolized, and only trace amounts were renally excreted. Melagatran was the major compound in urine and feces after administration of ximelagatran. Appreciable quantities of ethyl-melagatran were also recovered in rat, dog, and human feces after oral administration, suggesting reduction of the hydroxyamidine group of ximelagatran in the gastrointestinal tract, as demonstrated when ximelagatran was incubated with feces homogenate. Polar metabolites in urine and feces (all species) accounted for a relatively small fraction of the dose. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was 5 to 10% in rats, 10 to 50% in dogs, and about 20% in humans, with low between-subject variation. The fraction of ximelagatran absorbed was at least 40 to 70% in all species. First-pass metabolism of ximelagatran with subsequent biliary excretion of the formed metabolites account for the lower bioavailability of melagatran.     

Characterization of in vitro biotransformation of new, orally active, direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, an amidoxime and ester prodrug.

N-Hydroxylated amidines (amidoximes) can be used as prodrugs of amidines. The prodrug principle was developed in our laboratory for pentamidine and had been applied to several other drug candidates. One of these compounds is melagatran, a novel, synthetic, low molecular weight, direct thrombin inhibitor. To increase the poor oral bioavailability due to its strong basic amidine functionality selected to fit the arginine side pocket of thrombin, the less basic N-hydroxylated amidine was used in addition to an ethyl ester-protecting residue. The objective of this investigation was to study the reduction and the hydrolytic metabolism of ximelagatran via two mono-prodrugs (N-hydroxy-melagatran and ethyl-melagatran) to melagatran by in vitro experiments. New high-performance liquid chromatography methods were developed to analyze all four compounds. The biotransformation of ximelagatran to melagatran involving the reduction of the amidoxime function and the ester cleavage could be demonstrated in vitro by microsomes and mitochondria from liver and kidney of pig and human, and the kinetic parameters were determined. So far, one enzyme system capable of reducing N-hydroxylated structures has been identified in pig liver microsomes, consisting of cytochrome b(5), NADH-cytochrome b(5) reductase, and a P450 isoenzyme of the subfamily 2D. This enzyme system also reduces ximelagatran and N-hydroxy-melagatran. The participation of recombinant human CYP1A2, 2A6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 with cytochrome b(5) and b(5) reductase in the reduction can be excluded. In summary, ximelagatran and N-hydroxy-melagatran are easily reduced by several enzyme systems located in microsomes and mitochondria of different organs.     

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran in Japanese and caucasian volunteers after oral administration of the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran

OBJECTIVES: Two studies were conducted to elucidate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after administration of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran to Caucasian and Japanese volunteers. METHODS: In study 1, with a single-blind, parallel-group design, young Japanese and Caucasian male volunteers were randomised to receive four single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24, 36 and 60mg on separate days; n = 27 per ethnic group) or placebo (n = 6 per ethnic group). In study 2, with an open-label design, elderly Japanese male volunteers (n = 12) received three single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24 and 36mg on separate days). RESULTS: Regardless of the ethnicity or age of the volunteers, ximelagatran given in single oral doses was rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to melagatran, and the melagatran area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (C(max)) increased in proportion with the ximelagatran dose, with only small deviations from absolute linearity. Higher melagatran AUC and C(max) were observed in young Japanese volunteers compared with young Caucasian volunteers, and in elderly Japanese volunteers compared with young Japanese volunteers. These results appear to be attributed to weight- and age-related decreases in renal elimination of melagatran rather than to absorption of ximelagatran and formation of melagatran. The pattern of metabolites in plasma and urine was comparable between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers, and between young and elderly Japanese volunteers. The melagatran plasma concentration-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin) relationship did not differ significantly between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers or between young and elderly Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity does not affect the absorption of ximelagatran or the formation of melagatran or the melagatran plasma concentration-aPTT relationship. The elimination of melagatran is correlated with renal function.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in young healthy Japanese men

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, which is rapidly bioconverted to its active form melagatran after oral administration, is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. This study assessed the effects of food and repeated dosing on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran to young healthy Japanese males. METHODS: In part one of the two-part study, volunteers (n = 24) were randomised to receive in a crossover fashion a single oral dose of ximelagatran 48mg with or without breakfast on 2 days separated by a 2- to 7-day washout period. In the second part of the study, all volunteers received oral doses of ximelagatran 48mg every 12 hours for 5 days followed by a single dose on the morning of day 6. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and urinary excretion of melagatran did not differ as a function of whether ximelagatran was taken with or without food. The relationship between the melagatran plasma concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, which reflects the thrombin inhibitory effect of melagatran) was also independent of concomitant food intake. During repeated dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations of melagatran were achieved after the second dose of ximelagatran on day 1 and remained stable through the rest of the dosing period. The melagatran AUC and C(max) increased slightly (by 18% and 22%, respectively) on day 6 compared with day 1. The interindividual variability in the melagatran AUC and C(max) remained low, as reflected by coefficients of variation of <20% on both day 1 and day 6. The amount of melagatran excreted in urine remained stable over the 6 days of repeated dosing. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran were not affected by food or repeated dosing in healthy Japanese volunteers.     

Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomised, 3 x 3 crossover study with 4 study days, separated by washout periods of 7 days. SUBJECTS: Subjects comprised 6 healthy young men (aged 20-27 years) and 12 healthy older men and women (aged 56-70 years). METHODS: All subjects received a 2mg intravenous infusion of melagatran over 10 minutes followed, in randomised sequence, by a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran with breakfast, a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran while fasting, and a 7.5 mg subcutaneous injection of ximelagatran. The primary variables were the plasma concentration of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin. RESULTS: After oral and subcutaneous administration, ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and biotransformed to melagatran, its active form and the dominant compound in plasma. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in young and older subjects after both oral and subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran clearance of melagatran was correlated with renal function, resulting in about 40% (after intravenous melagatran) to 60% (after oral and subcutaneous ximelagatran) higher melagatran exposure in the older than in the young subjects. Renal clearance of melagatran, was 7.7 L/h and 4.9 L/h in the younger and older subjects, respectively. The interindividual variability inn the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve was low following all regimens (coefficient variation 12-25%). The mean bioavailability of melagatran in young and older subjects was approximately 18 and 12% , respectively, following oral administration of ximalagratan, and 38 and 45%, respectively, following subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was unaffected by whether subjects were fed or fasting, although the plasma concentration of melagatran peaked about 1 hour later under fed than fasting conditions, due to gastric emptying of the immediate-release tablet formulation used. The APTT as prolonged with increasing melagatran plasma concentration-effect relationship was independent of age. CONCLUSIONS: There were no age-dependent differences in the absorption and biotransformation of ximelagatran, and the observed differences in exposure to melagatran can be explained by differences in renal function between the young and older subjects.     

Possible inhibitory effect of diazepam on the metabolism of zotepine,an antipsychotic drug

Effects of smoking and cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) status on the single dose kinetics of zotepine and pharmacokinetic interaction between zotopine and diazepam were investigated. In 14 healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of zotepine after a single oral 25 mg dose were compared between eight smokers and six non-smokers, or between seven extensive metabolizers (EMs) and seven poor metabolizers (PMs) ofS-mephenytoin. There was no significant difference in any pharmacokinetic parameters between smokers and non-smokers, or between the EM and PM groups. In 17 patients treated with zotepine 80–340 mg/day, intra-individual changes in plasma concentrations of zotepine caused by coadministration of diazepam 10 mg/day for 2 weeks were examined. Plasma concentrations of zotepine were significantly increased after coadministration of diazepam (P<0.05). Consequently, it is suggested that neither smoking nor CYP2C19 status affects the metabolism of zotepine. The elevation in plasma concentrations of zotepine after coadministration of diazepam may be a result of competitive inhibition of zotepine metabolism by diazepam via other isoenzyme than CYP2C19, e.g., CYP3A4.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, are unaffected by a single dose of alcohol

Ximelagatran-a direct thrombin inhibitor rapidly converted to its active form, melagatran, after oral administration-is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability/safety of ximelagatran following a single 36-mg oral dose of ximelagatran +/- a single oral dose of alcohol (0.5 and 0.6 g ethanol/kg to women and men, respectively) were assessed in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study (n = 26). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) and least squares mean estimates for the ratio of ximelagatran plus alcohol to ximelagatran alone for melagatran AUC (1.04 [90% CI = 1.00-1.08]) and C(max) (1.08 [90% CI = 1.03-1.14]) fell within the bounds demonstrating no interaction. Alcohol did not alter the melagatran-induced prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time or the good tolerability/safety profile of ximelagatran. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability/safety of oral ximelagatran were not affected by alcohol.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran co-administered with different classes of antibiotics in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of amoxicillin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, and cefuroxime on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, which is a substrate for the P-glycoprotein pump (P-gp) transporter but is not metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme system. METHODS: Five parallel groups of 16 healthy volunteers received two sequential treatments. The first treatment was a single 36-mg dose of ximelagatran. During the second treatment period, one of the above antibiotics was given on days 1-5 after a washout of at least 2 days. A single 36-mg oral dose of ximelagatran was given on the mornings of days 1 and 5 of the second treatment period. RESULTS: No pharmacokinetic interactions were detected between ximelagatran and amoxicillin, doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin as the least-squares geometric mean treatment ratio of ximelagatran with-to-without antibiotic fell within the intervals of 0.80-1.25 for the area under the curve (AUC) and 0.7-1.43 for C(max). After co-administration with azithromycin, the least square mean ratio with-to-without antibiotic for AUC of melagatran was 1.60 (90% CI, 1.40-1.82) on day 1 and 1.41 (90% CI, 1.24-1.61) on day 5. For melagatran C(max), the corresponding ratios were 1.63 (90% CI, 1.38-1.92) and 1.40 (90% CI, 1.18-1.66). After co-administration with cefuroxime, the ratios were 1.23 (90% CI, 1.07-1.42) and 1.16 (90% CI, 0.972-1.38) for AUC and 1.33 (90% CI, 1.07-1.66) and 1.19 (90%CI, 0.888-1.58) for C(max) of melagatran. Co-administration with the antibiotics did not change mean time to C(max), half-life, or renal clearance of melagatran. The melagatran plasma concentration-response relationship for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) prolongation was not altered by any of the studied antibiotics, but the increased plasma concentrations of melagatran after co-administration of ximelagatran with azithromycin resulted in a minor increase in the mean maximum APTT of about 15%. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran were not affected by amoxicillin, doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin. Melagatran exposure was increased when ximelagatran was co-administered with azithromycin and, to a lesser extent, with cefuroxime. APTT was not significantly altered by any of the antibiotics.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor,in young healthy male subjects

OBJECTIVES: Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor designed to overcome the low and variable oral absorption of melagatran, its active form. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran following single and repeated oral administration were investigated. The primary objectives were to determine the dose linearity and reproducibility of melagatran exposure and the influence of food intake. METHODS: Two open-label studies were performed in healthy male subjects. Study I was a dose-escalation study, in which subjects received single oral doses of ximelagatran (1-98 mg). Study II was a randomised, two-way crossover study consisting of two 5-day treatment periods, in which subjects received a 20-mg oral dose of ximelagatran twice daily, either before breakfast and with dinner, or with breakfast and after dinner. RESULTS: Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and converted to melagatran, which was the predominant compound in plasma. The mean (+/- standard deviation) bioavailability of melagatran was 22.2+/-4.3% and 17.4+/-2.8% after single and repeated dosings, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran and the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased linearly with dose. Inter- and intra-subject variability in melagatran AUC was 8% and 12%, respectively, with no relevant food- or time dependence. Anticoagulation, assessed as activated partial thromboplastin time, was correlated with melagatran plasma concentration. There was virtually no increase in capillary bleeding time over the dose range studied, and ximelagatran was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: After oral administration of ximelagatran to healthy male subjects, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of melagatran is predictable and reproducible.     

Pharmacokinetics of melagatran and the effect on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran: a population model analysis

OBJECTIVE: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran, its active form. The objective of this population analysis was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of melagatran and its effect on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measure of coagulation time, in orthopaedic surgery patients sequentially receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran as prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. To support the design of a pivotal dose-finding study, the impact of individualised dosage based on bodyweight and calculated creatinine clearance was examined. DESIGN AND METHODS: Pooled data obtained in three small dose-guiding studies were analysed. The patients received twice-daily administration, with either subcutaneous melagatran alone or a sequential regimen of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran, for 8-11 days starting just before initiation of surgery. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to evaluate rich data of melagatran pharmacokinetics (3326 observations) and the pharmacodynamic effect on APTT (2319 observations) in samples from 216 patients collected in the three dose-guiding trials. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models were validated using sparse data collected in a subgroup of 319 patients enrolled in the pivotal dose-finding trial. The impact of individualised dosage on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability was evaluated by simulations of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of melagatran were well described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption after both subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran. Melagatran clearance was correlated with renal function, assessed as calculated creatinine clearance. The median population clearance (creatinine clearance 70 mL/min) was 5.3 and 22.9 L/h for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The bioavailability of melagatran after oral ximelagatran relative to subcutaneous melagatran was 23%. The volume of distribution was influenced by bodyweight. For a patient with a bodyweight of 75kg, the median population estimates were 15.5 and 159L for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The relationship between APTT and melagatran plasma concentration was well described by a power function, with a steeper slope during and early after surgery but no influence by any covariates. Simulations demonstrated that individualised dosage based on creatinine clearance or bodyweight had no clinically relevant impact on the variability in melagatran pharmacokinetics or on the effect on APTT. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low impact of individualised dosage on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of melagatran supported the use of a fixed-dose regimen in the studied population of orthopaedic surgery patients, including those with mild to moderate renal impairment.     

Bioequivalence of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, as whole or crushed tablets or dissolved formulation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether crushed or dissolved tablets of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran are bioequivalent to whole tablet administration. Ximelagatran is currently under development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an open-label, randomised, three-period, three-treatment crossover study in which 40 healthy volunteers (aged 20-33 years) received a single 36-mg dose of ximelagatran administered in three different ways: I swallowed whole, II crushed, mixed with applesauce and ingested and III dissolved in water and administered via nasogastric tube. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of ximelagatran, its intermediates and the active form melagatran were determined. Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and the bioavailability of melagatran was similar after the three different administrations, fulfilling the criteria for bioequivalence. The mean area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of melagatran was 1.6 micromol.h/L (ratio 1.01 for treatment II/I and 0.97 for treatment III/I), the mean peak concentration (C(max)) was 0.3 micromol/L (ratio 1.04 for treatment II/I and 1.02 for treatment III/I) and the mean half-life (t(1/2)) was 2.8 h for all treatments. The time to C(max) (t(max)) was 2.2h for the whole tablet and approximately 0.5 h earlier when the tablet was crushed or dissolved (1.7-1.8 h), due to a more rapid absorption. The study drug was well tolerated as judged from the low incidence and type of adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the pharmacokinetics (AUC and C(max)) of melagatran were not significantly altered whether ximelagatran was given orally as a crushed tablet mixed with applesauce or dissolved in water and given via nasogastric tube.     

Ximelagatran/Melagatran: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery

Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement.After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time.The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients.CONCLUSIONS: Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.     

No influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND: The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is a new class of anticoagulant currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form melagatran.Objective: To investigate the influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: Nonblinded, nonrandomised study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve volunteers with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or B) and 12 age-, weight-, and sex-matched control volunteers with normal hepatic function. METHODS: Volunteers received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Plasma and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. RESULTS: The absorption and bioconversion of ximelagatran to melagatran were rapid in both groups. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran (Cmax) was achieved 2-3 hours after administration; the mean elimination half-life (t1/2z) was 3.6 hours for hepatically impaired volunteers and 3.1 hours for the control volunteers. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax of melagatran in volunteers with hepatic impairment were 11 and 25% lower than in control volunteers, respectively. However, after correcting for the higher renal function (i.e. higher calculated creatinine clearance) in the hepatically impaired volunteers, the ratio of melagatran AUC for hepatically impaired/control volunteers was 0.98 (90% CI 0.80, 1.22), suggesting that mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran. Melagatran was the predominant compound in urine, accounting for 13-14% of the ximelagatran dose. Renal clearance of melagatran was 13% higher in hepatically impaired than in control volunteers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the concentration-response relationship between plasma melagatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Baseline prothrombin time (PT) was slightly longer in the hepatically impaired patients than in the control volunteers, probably reflecting a slight decrease in the activity of coagulation factors. However, when concentrations of melagatran were at their peak, the increase in PT from baseline values was the same in both groups. Capillary bleeding time was measured in the hepatically impaired patients only, and was not increased by ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran between the hepatically impaired and control volunteers. These findings suggest that dose adjustment for patients with mild-to-moderate impairment of hepatic function is not necessary.     

Influence of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral ximelagatran and subcutaneous melagatran

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development as an anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form, melagatran. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran following administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: This was a nonblinded randomised crossover study with 2 study days, separated by a washout period of 1-3 weeks. Twelve volunteers with severe renal impairment and 12 controls with normal renal function were included, with median (range) glomerular filtration rates (GFR) of 13 (5-24) and 86 (70-105) mL/min, respectively. All volunteers received, in a randomised sequence, a 3mg subcutaneous injection of melagatran and a 24mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran. Blood samples were collected up to 12 and 14 hours after administration of the subcutaneous and oral doses, respectively, for determination of melagatran plasma concentrations and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measurement of coagulation time. Urine was collected for 24 hours after each dose for determination of melagatran concentration. RESULTS: For the volunteers with severe renal impairment, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life of melagatran were significantly higher than in the control group with normal renal function. Least-squares mean estimates of the ratios of the mean AUC for volunteers with severe renal impairment and controls (95% confidence intervals) were 4.03 (3.29-4.93) after subcutaneous melagatran and 5.33 (3.76-7.56) after oral ximelagatran. This result was related to the decreased renal clearance (CL(R)) of melagatran, which was linearly correlated with GFR. In the severe renal impairment and control groups, respectively, the mean CL(R) of melagatran was 12.5 and 81.3 mL/min after subcutaneous administration of melagatran and 14.3 and 107 mL/min after oral administration of ximelagatran. There was a nonlinear relationship between the APTT ratio (postdose/predose APTT value) and melagatran plasma concentration. A statistically significant higher slope of the concentration-effect relationship, described by linear regression of the APTT ratio versus the square root of melagatran plasma concentrations, was estimated for the group with severe renal impairment compared to the control group; however, the increase in slope was minor and the estimated differences in APTT ratio between the groups in the studied concentration range was less than 10% and not considered clincially relevant. Ximelagatran and melagatran were well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: After administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran, subjects with severe renal impairment had significantly higher melagatran exposure and longer half-life because of lower CL(R) of melagatran compared with the control group with normal renal function, suggesting that a decrease in dose and/or an increase in the administration interval in patients with severe renal impairment would be appropriate.     

Lack of correlation between in vitro inhibition of CYP3A-mediated metabolism by a PPAR-gamma agonist and its effect on the clinical pharmacokinetics of midazolam, an in vivo probe of CYP3A activity

RG 12525 (2-[[4-[[2-(1H-tetrazole-5-ylmethyl)phenyl]methoxy]phenoxy]methyl] quinolone) is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) agonist. In vitro microsomal inhibition assays indicated that RG 12525 is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, with a Ki value of 0.5 microM. With the conservative assumption that the total plasma concentration of drug was available to metabolic enzymes following RG 12525 oral administration, marked inhibition of CYP3A4 was expected to substantially reduce the systemic clearance of compounds metabolized by this enzyme. The possibility also existed for inhibition of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 by RG 12525 to reduce "first-pass" metabolism and increase absolute bioavailability of CYP3A4 substrates orally coadministered. Consequently, an in vivo drug-drug interaction study was performed to evaluate the effects of orally administered RG 12525 on in vivo CYP3A4 activity in healthy male subjects. The pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam, a probe for intestinal and hepatic CYP3A activity, was not influenced by either the low (100 mg qd for 4 days) or high (600 mg qd for4 days) RG 12525 dosing regimen despite the resulting total plasma concentrations of inhibitor that were well above in vitro Ki values. The point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of mean midazolam AUC for subjects administered 100 mg RG 12525 (110.6; 98.7-124.1) and 600 mg RG 12525 (98.4; 84.4-114.7) versus midazolam alone were within 80% to 125%. To explain these results, factors that could limit the accuracy of in vitro models in predicting metabolic drug interactions, mainly the high degree of RG 12525 protein binding (> 99.9%), were considered. The lack of correlation between the in vitro inhibition of CYP3A4 by RG 12525 and the inconsequential effects of this compound on midazolam pharmacokinetics accentuate the need to recognize factors other than plasma drug concentrations and potency of in vitro enzyme inhibition when extrapolating in vitro data to predict in vivo drug-drug interactions.     

A pharmacokinetic study of the combined administration of amiodarone and ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. This single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated the potential for the interaction of ximelagatran (36 mg every 12 hours for 8 days, measured as its active form melagatran in blood) and amiodarone (single 600-mg oral dose on day 4) in healthy male subjects (n = 26). For amiodarone + ximelagatran versus amiodarone + placebo, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals for amiodarone AUC(0-120) and C(max) were 0.87 (0.69-1.08) and 0.86 (0.66-1.11), respectively. For desethylamiodarone, the principal metabolite of amiodarone, the corresponding ratios were 1.00 (0.89-1.12) for AUC(0-120) and 0.92 (0.77-1.09) for C(max).The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for ximelagatran + amiodarone versus ximelagatran were 1.21 (1.17-1.25) for melagatran AUC(0-12) and 1.23 (1.18-1.28) for melagatran C(max). These confidence intervals were within or only slightly outside the interval, suggesting no interaction (0.8-1.25 for the effect of amiodarone on melagatran and 0.7-1.43 for the effect of melagatran on amiodarone or desethylamiodarone). Amiodarone did not affect the concentration-effect relationship of melagatran on activated partial thromboplastin time. Ximelagatran was well tolerated when coadministered with a single dose of amiodarone. Evaluation of the safety of the combination is needed to confirm that the relatively small pharmacokinetic changes in this study are of no clinical significance.     

Effect of pioglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its major metabolite,norverapamil, in rats

Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic drug, inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and CYP3A4 enzymes in vitro. This study investigated the effect of pioglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its major metabolite, norverapamil, in rats, after oral administration of verapamil (9 mg/kg) in the presence or absence of pioglitazone (0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg). Pioglitazone altered verapamil pharmacokinetics compared with verapamil alone. The presence of 1.0 mg/kg of pioglitazone significantly (p < 0.05) increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak concentration (C(max)) of verapamil by 49.0% and 46.8%, respectively, and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the total plasma clearance (CL/F) of verapamil by 32.8%. The metabolite-parent AUC ratio in the presence of pioglitazone (1.0 mg/kg) significantly (p < 0.05) decreased by 21.9% compared to the control group. Thus, coadministration of pioglitazone inhibited the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of verapamil.     

Possible inhibitory effect of diazepam on the metabolism of zotepine,an antipsychotic drug

Effects of smoking and cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) status on the single dose kinetics of zotepine and pharmacokinetic interaction between zotepine and diazepam were investigated. In 14 healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of zotepine after a single oral 25 mg dose were compared between eight smokers and six non-smokers, or between seven extensive metabolizers (EMs) and seven poor metabolizers (PMs) of S-mephenytoin. There was no significant difference in any pharmacokinetic parameters between smokers and non-smokers, or between the EM and PM groups. In 17 patients treated with zotepine 80–340 mg/day, intra-individual changes in plasma concentrations of zotepine caused by coadministration of diazepam 10 mg/day for 2 weeks were examined. Plasma concentrations of zotepine were significantly increased after coadministration of diazepam (P < 0.05). Consequently, it is suggested that neither smoking nor CYP2C19 status affects the metabolism of zotepine. The elevation in plasma concentrations of zotepine after coadministration of diazepam may be a result of competitive inhibition of zotepine metabolism by diazepam via other isoenzyme than CYP2C19, e.g., CYP3A4. Received: 25 March 1996/Final version: 28 May 1996     

Consistent pharmacokinetics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and in healthy subjects

Objective To investigate the influence of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran and its active form, melagatran.Methods In an open study, 12 patients with persistent NVAF and 12 age- and gender-matched, healthy control subjects received a 10-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 2.66 mg melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily, for the subsequent five study days. Plasma and urine samples for PK analyses were collected after i.v. and single and repeated oral dosing.Results The oral absorption of ximelagatran was rapid, and maximum plasma concentrations of ximelagatran (C_max) were achieved at about 1 h post-dosing. There were no differences between NVAF patients and controls for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, C_max, half-life (t_1/2), or bioavailability (F) of melagatran after oral dosing with ximelagatran. The C_max of melagatran, formed by the rapid bioconversion of ximelagatran, occurred approximately 3 h post-dosing. The geometric means of the t_1/2 for melagatran were 4.0 h and 4.2 h for the first and last doses, respectively, in patients, and 3.5 h and 3.7 h, respectively, in controls. Geometric means of F of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran were 22% and 24% for the first and last doses, respectively, in patients and 21% and 23%, respectively, in controls. Approximately 80% of the i.v. dose of melagatran was excreted in urine in patients and in controls.Conclusion The PK properties of oral ximelagatran and i.v. melagatran in elderly patients with NVAF are consistent with those in matched, healthy controls.