��ǻ���������г��ھֲ���չ��ֱ���������е�����

目的 评价盆腔脏器联合切除术（PE）对局部进展期直肠癌的疗效。方法 对12年中79例局部进展期直肠癌PE术后结果进行回顾性总结。结果 全盆腔脏器切除术（TPE）46例，其中保肛TPE5例，TPE联合骶骨切除1例，TPE联合半骨盆切除1例，后盆腔脏器切除术（PPE）33例。根治性切除65例（82．8％），合并症发生率48．6％，手术死亡2例（2．5％），根治术后再复发36例（58．1％），术后1、3、5年生存率75．8％、39．3％、35．8％。根治性切除与大体根治切除术后3年、5年生存率分别为44．2％、40．8％与11．1％、0。结论 PE是目前治疗局部进展期直肠癌有效的方法，积极的根治性切除病灶，可以有效提高其治愈率，改善生活质量。     

Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Options for curative resection.

Pelvic recurrence is an ominous event after curative resection of rectal cancer and is rarely amenable to re-resection by conventional methods. A method to permit a composite resection of these using the abdominal sacral approach has been described previously. This report updates that experience with resection of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer in 28 patients. Of these, 24 were done with curative intent, and four were done for palliation (mainly for infected or fungating tumor). All patients had extensive preoperative evaluation by clinical and radiologic tests, and most patients had a long free interval period of approximately 18 months, after their primary resection. Although 47 patients had exploratory surgery, only 29 had local disease amenable to resection and four had palliative resections. About half the patients had had an abdominoperineal resection, half had had an anterior resection, and one third had had previous efforts to resect the recurrence. All but one patient had been irradiated with 3000-11,000 cGy. All but two patients (of the 24 curative efforts) required a formal abdominosacral resection (through S1-2 in 12, S2-3 in 9, and S4-5 in 1). Over half the patients also required a bladder resection. There were three operative deaths (12%); one patient had a cardiac death immediately after operation and two were septic deaths at 35 and 60 days. The survivors generally had relief of sacral root pain and good motor function; most of those previously employed could return to work. The actuarial 5-year survival rate is 25% and median survival is 36 months. Long-term survival over 48 months was recorded in five of 21 surgical survivors (23.8%). Survival in a historic comparative group of 30 patients treated for local recurrence only (mainly by radiation) was 15 months median, and at 5 years the survival rate was 3% (p less than 0.001). In conclusion, selected patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer may be retrieved by and returned to functional life with the composite abdominosacral resection.     

Isolated Chemotherapeutic Perfusion of Pelvis as Neoadjuvant or Palliative Therapy for Advanced Cancer of the Rectum

Introduction Previously irradiated recurrent rectal cancer is a formidable patient threat with limited treatment options. Isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) by the balloon-occlusion technique provides high-dose regional chemotherapy that may facilitate resection if appropriate or palliate pain and fungating tumor mass in the symptomatic patient. We currently report our results in 49 recurrent rectal cancer patients (26 had neoadjuvant IPP with intent to resect and 23 had IPP for palliation). Methods IPP was done for 1 hour with paclitaxel 30 mg/m², 5 fluorouracil 1500 mg/m², cisplatin/oxaliplatin 60-130 mg/m², and mitomycin C 10 to 15 mg/m² (the latter three achieving pelvic-to-systemic drug ratios of 6–9:1). Results Neoadjuvant perfusion in 26 patients achieved a response in 14 patients (made resectable). Seven had R0 resections (clear margins), six by abdominal sacral resection (ABSR), and one by an extended APR. Of seven other patients, one had a complete pathologic response negating planned resection, one had >50% tumor regression in pelvis (but developed distant metastases), and three refused ABSR. Planned ABSR in two patients was aborted because of complicating cardiovascular issues. A variety of medical and cancer issues precluded resection in the remaining 12 of these 26 neoadjuvant patients. Within the neoadjuvant group, median survival was 24 months in the responding (made resectable) group (14 patients) and it was 8 months in the non-resectable group (12 patients), p = 0.0001. In the responding (made resectable) group, seven patients had R0 resections (median survival 26 months) and seven patients were not resected (median survival 18 months), p = 0.0198. In the IPP group for palliation, 17 of 23 patients (74%) had significant relief of pain, and other tumor-related symptoms (mean survival 11 months). Conclusion Isolated pelvic perfusion using a simplified balloon-occlusion technique has promise in palliation of or augmenting resectability of advanced rectal malignancy in patients not amenable to treatment with conventional modalities.     

Composite pelvic exenteration: Is it worthwhile?

Background In locally advanced pelvic cancer, tumor fixation to the bony pelvis is regarded as unresectable and often inoperable. Few data exist regarding the futility or utility of pelvic exenteration with en bloc resection of involved portions of the bony pelvis. Methods Thirty-four of 625 patients undergoing radical pelvic procedures had an en bloc resection of pelvic organs with portions of the bony pelvis. There were 19 female and 15 male patients, and the median age was 59 years. Primary neoplasms included 19 rectal, 6 cervicouterine, 4 anal, 3 vaginal, 1 sarcoma, and 1 penile. All but three patients underwent preoperative pelvic irradiation. Pelvic exenterations were posterior in 7 patients, anterior in 3, supralevator in 3, and total in 21 patients. Pelvic bony resections included portions of the sacrum-coccyx in 18 patients, ischium in 5, pubic symphysis in 4, and ischial pubic rami in 4, and hemipelvectomy was performed in 3. Results Surgical morbidity occurred in 67.6% (23) of 24 patients. Median follow-up was 37 months. Pelvic or perineal tumor recurrence was concurrent with distant metastases in 9 patients (26.4%); 6 (17.6%) had only distant relapse, and 2 (5.8%) died with local recurrence alone. Overall cancer-related mortality rate was 50%. Five-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates were 44% and 52%, respectively. Conclusions Substantial survival can be accomplished for patients whose tumors are fixed to limited portions of the bony pelvis. These procedures are still associated with substantial morbidity, but operative mortality is infrequent.     

盆腔脏器切除术治疗复发直肠癌

目的：探讨盆腔脏器切除术治疗复发直肠癌的疗效。方法：对1984年至2000年复发直肠癌患49例行盆腔脏器切了作术的临床资料及生存资料进行分析，结果：全组无手术死亡，R0切除率为91．8％，手术并发症发生率为12．2％，本组总的3年生存率为82．4％，5年生存率为48．7％，其中45例获得R0切除患的3年生存率为83．5％，5年生存率为59．5％，17例行全盆腔脏器切除术患的3年生存率为72．7％，5年生存率为45．5％，结论：盆腔脏器切除术是治疗复发直肠癌的有效方法，严格选择病例，确保R0切除，妥善重建泌尿和消化通道及妥善覆盖盆腔，是获得满意疗效，降低术后并发症发生率的关键。     

The role of pelvic exenteration in the management of recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Use of extirpative surgery in the setting of recurrent rectal cancer is controversial given the poor overall outcome of such patients and the morbidity associated with exenteration. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated for recurrent rectal cancer from 1990 to 2002 was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent pelvic exenteration. Seventeen underwent potentially curative resection, 5 were for palliation only. There was 1 operative death. Fifteen suffered at least 1 complication; 9 suffered multiple complications. Ten patients required readmission to the hospital. The overall disease-free interval was 11 months. Potentially curative and palliative resections resulted in median survivals of 20.4 and 8.4 months, respectively (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: While patients may derive oncologic and palliative benefits from exenteration, the price in terms of operative morbidity remains high. Newer measures of operative morbidity are necessary to better appraise the value of this radical approach to recurrent rectal cancer.     

Patterns of pelvic invasion are prognostic in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative resection remains a difficult clinical problem. The aim of this study was to elucidate prognostic risk factors after resection of recurrent cancer. METHODS: Between January 1983 and December 1999, 83 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were studied retrospectively for survival benefit by re-resection. Sixty patients underwent resection for recurrent cancer, including total pelvic exenteration in 30 patients and sacrectomy in 23 patients. The extent of locally recurrent tumour was classified by the pattern of pelvic invasion as follows: localized, sacral invasion and lateral invasion. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that the pattern of pelvic invasion was a significant prognostic factor which independently influenced survival after resection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates were 38 per cent in the localized type (n = 27), 10 per cent in the sacral invasive type (n = 16) and zero in the lateral invasive type (n = 17). CONCLUSION: Resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer is potentially curative in patients with localized or sacral invasive patterns of recurrence. Alternatives should be explored in patients with recurrence involving the lateral pelvic wall.     

Exenteración pélvica con resección rectal por neoplasias de distinto origen en dos centros de referencia

Introduction

Pelvic exenteration (PE) offers the best chance of cure for locally advanced primary or recurrent pelvic organ malignancies invading adjacent organs. The aims of this study were to analyse results for any pelvic exenteration that includes rectal resection and the analysis of results of fecal and urinary reconstruction.

Abdominal Sacral Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Local recurrence of rectal cancer develops in the posterior bony pelvis as an isolated event in about half of the patients with recurrence. Although radiation can palliate sacral root pain, the disease is usually progressive and is rarely amenable to conventional resection. We have adapted a surgical technique usually used for primary sacral tumors, which permits a complete en bloc excision of recurrent rectal cancer in most instances. This approach consists of a laparotomy with pelvic dissection and mobilization of structures to be resected. The patient is repositioned prone and the posterior pelvis (sacrum and side walls) is then resected with preservation of appropriate nerve roots of the posterior pelvis and the sciatic nerve. Reconstruction is done with muscle and skin flaps. We have done 21 such procedures, of which, 11 were for pelvic recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma. Seven patients had resections for cure and four had palliative resections of fungating or infected tumors. All but one patient was postabdominal perineal resection and nine patients had been irradiated (3000-9000 rads). Two patients had received up to 9000 rads in separate courses (external beam in one and interstitial radiation in the other). The posterior extent of resection was S1-2 to 5 in six patients; S3 to 5 in three patients, and S4-5 in two patients. Anterior exenteration was performed in three patients and three patients had additional resection of other organs. In the curative resection group, three patients are living free of disease at six, ten, and 52 months, and one patient was NED at 60 months, but has again had tumor recurrance and is living with disease at 65 months. One patient died of disease at 13 months and one patient died of a pulmonary embolus following resection for ureteral obstruction at five months. One postoperative death occurred from a cerebrovascular accident at 52 days. In the palliative resection group, three patients survived with relief of local tumor symptoms four, eight, and 12 months. One patient who had received a total of 9000 rads developed flap necrosis, small bowel fistula and died 60 days after resection. Although this is a small series, it suggests that abdominal sacral resection of locally advanced pelvic cancer is feasible and may provide good palliation in most and possible cure in some patients who develop recurrence after primary resection of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.     

Therapy results of locoregional recurrences in rectal cancer

Despite of advanced surgical technique and multimodality therapy results following secondary resection of local recurrence after rectal cancer are discussed controversially. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1999 81 patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer were treated at our surgical department. Median age was 63 years, 62 % of patients were male. 98 % of recurrences were in local advanced stage (74 % = rT4, 25 % = rT3), 44 % of patients had synchronous distant metastases. RESULTS: 32 patients underwent resection of recurrent rectal cancer. Potential curative surgery was possible in 56 % of resections. Extended resections of adjacent organs were necessary in 21 patients. The 4-year survival in the curative group was 44 % compared to 19 % in patients with microscopic or gross residual disease. CONCLUSION: Optimistic long-term results in recurrent rectal cancer can only be achieved after curative resection. Preoperative radiochemotherapy in advanced cancers increases curative resection and probably survival rate.     

A 10-year experience of total pelvic exenteration for primary advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer based on a prospective database

Aim The study was conducted in a dedicated centre treating the majority of Danish patients with intended curative total pelvic exenteration for primary advanced (PARC) or locally recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer. We compared PARC and LRRC and analysed postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long‐term outcome. Method There were 90 consecutive patients (PARC/LRRC 50/40) treated between January 2001 and October 2010, recorded on a prospectively maintained database. Results The median age was 63 (32–75) years with a gender ratio of 7 women to 83 men. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists level I or II. Sacral resection was performed in five patients with PARC and 15 with LRRC (P = 0.002). R0 resection was achieved in 33 (66%) patients with PARC and in 15 (38%) with LRRC, R1 resection in 17 (34%) with PARC and 20 (50%) with LRRC and R2 resection in five (13%) with LRRC. R0 resection was more frequent in PARC (P = 0.007). Forty‐four (49%) patients had no postoperative complications. Fifty‐five major complications were registered. Two (2.2%) patients died within 30 days, and the total in‐hospital mortality was 5.6%. The median follow‐up was 12 (0.4–91) months. The 5‐year survival was 46% for PARC and 17% for LRRC (P = 0.16). Conclusion Pelvic exenteration is associated with considerable morbidity but low mortality in an experienced centre. Pelvic exenteration can improve long‐term survival, especially for patients with PARC. However, pelvic exenteration is also justified for patients with LRRC.     

Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND: The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time. RESULTS: Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02). More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002). The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level < or =30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival.     

Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Pelvic exenteration provided worthwhile palliation and achieved a cumulative five-year survival rate of 38.8% in 49 patients who had carcinoma of the lower colon or rectum infiltrating adjoining pelvic viscera. Survival and the disease-free period were not significantly different after total or posterior exenteration. The stage of disease was the major determinant of outcome: five-year survival rates averaged 51.8% and 28.8% for Stages II and III, respectively. Hospital mortality (26.9%) after total exenteration was chiefly due to technical mishaps, and the inclusion of many high-risk but symptomatic elderly patients. Complete clearance of locally advanced colorectal cancer by pelvic exenteration is indicated in fit patients, especially those with Stage II disease.     

应用盆腔脏器联合切除术治疗局部复发型直肠癌

目的 评价盆腔脏器联合切除术对局部复发型直肠癌的治疗意义。方法 对我院33例局部复发型直肠癌应用盆腔脏器联合切除术治疗的病例进行回顾性总结。结果 33例患中17例接受全盆腔脏器切除术治疗，14例接受后盆腔脏器切除术；2例为直肠癌合并输尿管下段切除。29例（87．9％）手术为根治术，手术死亡率3．0％。盆腔受累最多的器官是骶前组织和阴道。术后约88．9％的患疼痛症状消失。8例（24．2％）再次复发，并再用手术。全组2、3、4年生存率分别为36．4％、21．2％、18．2％。结论 积极的盆腔脏器联合切除术可以明显改善局部复发型直肠癌的预后，提高术后生活质量。     

Prognostic Effect of Perioperative Change of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level: A Useful Tool for Detection of Systemic Recurrence in Rectal Cancer

Background The prognosis of patients even with the same stage of rectal cancer varies widely. We analyzed the capability of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level for predicting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients. Methods We reviewed 631 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their serum CEA concentrations on the seventh day before and on the seventh day after surgery: group A, normal CEA level (≤5 ng/mL) in both periods; group B, increased preoperative and normal postoperative CEA; and group C, continuously increased CEA in both periods. The prognostic relevance of the CEA group was investigated by analyses of recurrence patterns and survival. Results Stage III patients showed higher systemic recurrence (P = .001) and worse 5-year survival rates (P < .0001) for group C than for groups A and B. On multivariate analysis, the CEA group was a significant predictor for recurrence (P < .001; relative risk, 2.740; 95% confidence interval, 1.677–4.476) and survival (P = .001; relative risk, 2.174; 95% confidence interval, 1.556–3.308). Conclusions The perioperative serum CEA change was a useful prognostic indicator to predict for systemic recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer patients.     

Hydronephrosis Does Not Preclude Curative Resection of Pelvic Recurrences After Colorectal Surgery

Background In one third of patients who die of rectal cancer, a pelvic recurrence after resection represents isolated disease for which re-resection may provide cure. These extensive resections can carry high morbidity. Proper patient selection is desirable but difficult. Hydronephrosis has been documented previously to portend a poor prognosis, and some consider it a contraindication to attempted resection. It was our goal to review our experience and either confirm or refute these conclusions. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 90 patients resected with curative intent for pelvic recurrence at our center from 1988 through 2003. Seventy-one records documented the preoperative presence or absence of hydronephrosis. Clinical and pathologic data were recorded. The groups with and without hydronephrosis were compared. Results There were 15 patients with hydronephrosis in this study and 56 without. Although patients with hydronephrosis had shorter overall survival, disease-free survival, and rate of local control, none of these differences was statistically significant. Patients in the hydronephrosis group were younger and had higher-stage primary tumors and larger recurrent tumors. Subsequently, they underwent more extensive resections and were more likely to be treated with adjuvant therapies. There was no difference in the rate of margin-negative resections between the groups. Conclusions Hydronephrosis correlates with younger patients with larger recurrent tumors undergoing more extensive operations and multimodality therapy but does not preclude curative (R0) resection or independently affect overall survival, disease-free survival, or local control. We believe that it should not be considered a contraindication to attempting curative resection.     

Curative surgery for local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after radical resection has been associated with morbidity and cancer-related death. This study retrospectively evaluated outcome following curative resection for rectal cancer recurring after surgery on the basis of prognosis, type of procedure and perioperative morbidity. METHODS: A total of 85 consecutive patients with local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer were evaluated. Of these, 43 underwent microscopic curative surgery for local recurrence. Among the 43 patients, 23 underwent surgery alone and 17 received preoperative radiotherapy (40 Gy) (XRT group) in addition to the surgery. Of the 43 patients, 26 were asymptomatic. RESULTS: Curative resection was higher in the recurrences that were associated with implantation, incomplete surgical margin clearance, and intrapelvic lymph node metastasis than in other types of recurrence. With regard to surgical procedure, abdominoperineal resection (APR), with or without sacral resection, was standard following previous sphincter-preserving surgery, while total pelvic exenteration (TPE), with or without sacral resection, was common following previous APR. Local excision was not considered appropriate surgery. There was a high incidence of perioperative morbidity (64%) in patients receiving TPE. Re-recurrence was observed in 18 patients (50%) after curative surgery. After a follow-up of 2 years or more, the local re-recurrence rate was 28%. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients receiving curative resection was 39%, for patients in the XRT group, 51%, and for patients in the surgery-alone group, 24% (p = 0.07). The survival rate in 26 asymptomatic patients was higher than in 17 patients with symptoms, with 5-year survival rates of 62 and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively. The cumulative local control in the preoperative radiotherapy plus en bloc surgery group (XRT group) was significantly better than in the surgery-alone group (p < 0.01), and survival in the XRT group tended to be better than in surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that careful patient selection according to the pattern of recurrence, area of invasion and presence of symptoms is important for successful curative surgery. Aggressive surgery with adjuvant therapy may lead to an improved salvage rate.     

Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine if routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical treatment offers the best prospect of survival for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, most cases are often diagnosed at an unresectable stage when traditional follow-up methods are used. The impact of MRI surveillance on the early diagnosis of local recurrences has yet to be ascertained. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal and left-sided colon tumors were included in a program of pelvic surveillance by routine MRI, in addition to the standard follow-up protocol. Cases were then analyzed for mode of diagnosis, resectability, and overall survival. RESULTS: Pelvic recurrence was found in 30 (13%) of the 226 patients studied. MRI detected 26 of 30 (87%) and missed 4 of 30 (13%) cases with local recurrence. Of the latter, 3 were anastomotic recurrences. In 28 (14%) patients, local recurrence was suspected by an initial MR scan but cleared by subsequent MRI or CT-guided biopsy. Recurrent pelvic cancer was diagnosed by MRI with 87% sensitivity and 86% specificity. In 19 (63%) cases, CEA was abnormally elevated, and 9 patients (30%) were symptomatic. Surgical resection was possible in only 6 patients (20%). There was no difference between MRI and conventional follow-up tests in their ability to detect cases suitable for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic surveillance by MRI is not justified as part of the routine follow-up after a curative resection for colorectal cancer and should be reserved for selectively imaging patients with clinical, colonoscopic, and/or biochemical suspicion of recurrent disease.     

浸润其他器官及局部复发结、直肠癌的手术治疗

目的：探讨浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌手术治疗的效果及手术治疗的要点。方法：回顾性分析本院１９７５年～１９９８年收治的浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌的局部浸润情况及合并切除率,直接法统计生存率。结果：①联合切除情况： １１６６例结肠癌中属Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期者１２３例,占１０．６％,行联合切除者４１例,占全部病例的３．５％,Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期病例的３３．３％;２ ３５６例直肠癌中属Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期者３０５例占１２．９％,行联合切除者１１７例,占全部病例的５．０％,Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期病例的３８．３％。②４１例结肠癌病人合并切除后的５年生存率为５３．８％。③１１７例直肠癌病人合并全盆腔器官切除者２７例,５年生存率为３３．３％（９／２７）,９０例联合部分器官切除后病人的５年生存率为４６．７％（４２／９０）。结论：对浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌病人,不论初发或复发,只要病人全身条件具备,应积极采用手术治疗的方法,对延长病人的生存期有重要意义。     

Total pelvic exenteration with preoperative irradiation for advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study the complication rate, local recurrence rate, and survival after total pelvic exenteration for primary advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital, Norway. SUBJECTS: 25 patients who were operated on for primary advanced and 22 for recurrent rectal cancer since 1991; 42 men and 5 women, mean age 64 years (range 44-78). All had preoperative irradiation of 46-50 Gy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of major complications, and actuarial 5-year survival and local recurrence rate. RESULTS: Twenty patients had RO resection in the primary group versus seven in the recurrent group. No R2 resections were done in the primary group compared with four in the recurrent group. Half the primary cases (n = 13) had abdominoperineal resections. Hartmann's procedures were common in both groups (n = 8 in each). Postoperative mortality at 30 days was 4% (n = 2) and in-hospital 13% (n = 6). 18 patients had major complications and 12 were reoperated on. Overall 5-year actuarial survival for 43 patients without distant metastases was 28%-those with primary tumours 36%, and those with recurrent tumours 18%-similar to the figures for RO and R1 resections. Actuarial local recurrence at 5 years for primary cancers was 18% compared with 68% for recurrent cancers, again nearly identical to the figures for R0/R1 operations (p = 0.008 and p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Some patients with advanced rectal cancer either primary or recurrent may benefit from simultaneous en-bloc cystectomy. The higher postoperative morbidity and mortality indicate the need for well-defined indications for this procedure and the necessity for thorough preoperative staging.