角膜厚度与高眼压症及青光眼的眼压

目的 探讨高眼压症、正常眼压性青光眼、原发性开角型青光眼患者及正常人的角膜厚度差异,分析角膜厚度与眼压间的关系,以及角膜厚度的测定对各型青光眼的诊断意见。方法 用超声波角膜测厚仪检测７３例（７３只眼）高眼压症、７９例（７９只眼）正常人的中央角膜厚度,并将其测定结果进行比较。回顾性分析每只青光眼治疗前的最高眼压（Ｇｏｌｄｍａｎｎ）,包括２４ｈ眼压曲线,用Ｅｈｌｅｒ法通过中央角膜厚度对眼压进行校正。结     

相干光断层扫描仪检测正常人及青光眼患者中央角膜厚度

目的探讨相干光断层扫描仪(OCT)测量正常人、原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)、高眼压症(OHT)患者的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。方法采用OCT3测量正常人143例(143只眼)、POAG患者36例(36只眼)、NTG患者39例(39只眼)及OHT患者40例(40只眼)的CCT,并进行单因素4水平设计定量资料的方差分析;用线性回归方法分析正常人CCT与Goldmann压平眼压测量值的相关关系;对OCT测量CCT观察者间和观察者内的一致性进行类内相关系数(ICC)分析。结果正常组、POAG组、NTG组及OHT组的平均CCT值分别为(523.66±32.13)μm、(530.92±27.32)μm、(506.92±21.49)μm及(573.13±27.39)μm。POAG组与正常人组的平均CCT值差异无统计学意义(P=0.099);OHT组的平均CCT值大于其他各组,均P<0.01;NTG组的平均CCT值小于其他各组,均P<0.01。正常组CCT与眼压值呈正相关(r=0.318,R2=0.101,P<0.01)。OCT测量CCT的测量者间和测量者内的ICC值分别为0.995和0.996。结论OCT可以准确地测量CCT;NTG患者平均CCT比正常人薄,而OHT患者比正常人厚;CCT可以影响Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值,但贡献率较小。(中华眼科杂志,2006,42:199-203)     

Comparison of central corneal thickness in patients participating in a glaucoma screening programme and those who were examined in the glaucoma unit

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure in patients participating in a glaucoma screening programme and patients who were examined in the glaucoma unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 406 patients of a glaucoma screening programme (Salzburg-Moorfields collaborative glaucoma study) were included in this study. In addition a group of 406 patients who were admitted to the glaucoma clinic for a detailed glaucoma examination was included (outpatient clinic group). In all participants central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured and possible relations of CCT within the study groups were statistically analysed. RESULTS: In the population screening group the mean central corneal thickness in normal subjects was 536+/-4.3 microm, in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) 552+/-5.7 microm, patients suffering from a normal tension glaucoma (NTG) showed a mean CCT of 534+/-14.2 microm and those with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) had a value of 521+/-17.9 microm. In the 'outpatient clinic group' the OHT subgroup had a mean CCT of 553+/-6.8 microm, the NTG subgroup of 529+/-26.5 microm and the one with POAG had a mean of 527+/-19.8 microm. In addition, CCT was measured in all glaucoma patients whose "partner" eye was healthy (544+/-5 microm) and included in this study as part of the normal subgroup. In both groups (screening group and outpatient group), CCT was significantly higher in OHT patients than in normals. In contrast, no statistically significant difference between normals and NTG or POAG patients was detected. Intraocular pressure was significantly lower in the screening groups than in the other ones. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the previously published results concerning OHT and healthy subjects. In this study no significant difference between NTG or POAG subjects and normal eyes was detected. The lower IOP in the screening population can be explained by the fact that patients contacting the screening program are self selected whereas patients of the glaucoma unit are admitted by practising ophthalmologists and are, therefore, rather advanced cases or carrying special risk factors.     

Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma

AIMS: To evaluate central corneal thickness determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various types of glaucoma, and its influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. METHODS: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by using OCT in 167 subjects (167 eyes). 20 had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 42 had low tension glaucoma (LTG), 22 had ocular hypertension (OHT), 10 had primary angle closure glaucoma (AC), 24 had pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEX), 13 had pigmentary glaucoma (PIG), and 36 were normal. RESULTS: CCT was significantly higher in ocular hypertensive subjects (593 (SD 35) microm, p <0.0001) than in the controls (530 (32) microm), whereas patients with LTG (482 (28) microm, p < 0. 0001), PEX (493 (33) microm, p <0.0001), and POAG (512 (30) microm, p <0.05) showed significantly lower readings. There was no statistically significant difference between the controls and patients with PIG (510 (39) microm) and AC (539 (37) microm). CONCLUSIONS: Because of thinner CCT in patients with LTG, PEX, and POAG this may result in underestimation of IOP, whereas thicker corneas may lead to an overestimation of IOP in subjects with OH. By determining CCT with OCT, a new and precise technique to measure CCT, this study emphasises the need for a combined measurement of IOP and CCT in order to obtain exact IOP readings.     

Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether central corneal thickness (CCT) is a confounding factor in the classification of patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by a single observer. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending a general ophthalmic clinic: 235 clinically normal eyes, 52 eyes with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 335 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 12 eyes with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXE), 42 eyes with chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG), and 232 glaucoma suspect (GS) eyes. INTERVENTION: Central corneal thickness was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation of CCT and diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean CCT was 553.9 microm (95% confidence intervals [CI] for the mean, 549.0-558.8 microm) in the clinically normal eyes, 550.1 microm (95% CI, 546.6-553.7 microm) in the POAG eyes, 514.0 microm (95% CI, 504.8-523.3 microm) in the NTG eyes, 530.7 microm (95% CI, 511.2-550.1 microm) in the PXE eyes, 559.9 microm (95% CI, 546.8-573.0 microm) in the CACG eyes, and 579.5 microm (95% CI, 574.8-584.1 microm) in the GS eyes. The differences of mean CCT between the groups were highly significant (P< 0.001 analysis of variance). Eighty-five percent of eyes with NTG and only 36% of eyes with POAG had a mean CCT of 540 microm or less. Thirteen percent of eyes with POAG and 42% of GS eyes had a mean CCT greater than 585 microm. CONCLUSIONS: The CCT measurement is desirable in patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital to avoid misclassification resulting from the relationship between CCT and tonometric pressure. Central corneal thickness alone is not an accurate predictor for the clinical diagnosis in this group of eyes. However, many eyes diagnosed as having NTG have thin corneas, which would tend to lower the tonometrically recorded intraocular pressure (IOP), so the finding of a less-than-normal thickness cornea introduces some doubt as to the diagnosis of NTG. For the GS eyes, most eyes had thick corneas, which would tend to increase the tonometrically recorded IOP. Thus, GS eyes with modest elevation of IOP and a thick cornea may be at low risk of progressing to POAG. Thus, many patients with "high IOPs" and a thick CCT do not necessarily have high IOPs and may not need to be followed as GS eyes.     

Central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal population

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by applanation tonometer in glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. METHODS: A total of 125 subjects were included in the study. Twenty-six had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 25 had pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG), 24 had ocular hypertension (OHT), and 50 of them were normal. IOP values were measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer whereas CCT values were measured by ultrasonic pachymeter. RESULTS: CCT values in the OHT group (595.75+/-22.52 microm) were greater than the CCT values of the POAG group (539.92+/-21.50 microm), the PXG group (526.28+/-31.73 microm), and the normal group (533.96+/-29.25 microm) (p<0.05). Eight patients who were diagnosed with OHT showed IOP values of 21 mm Hg or lower with corrected IOP values according to CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Increased CCT may lead to falsely high values of IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer. In this study, when IOP values of the OHT group were redefined according to the formulae regarding the CCT, the authors noted that one third of them were normal. Determination of the CCT in OHT cases is crucial since it has great impact on IOP values, measured with applanation tonometer, which is the main parameter in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma.     

Central corneal thickness and vascular risk factors in normal tension glaucoma

BACKGROUND: Normal tension glaucoma (NTG) has been shown to be associated with reduced central corneal thickness (CCT). The association of NTG with vascular risk factors is well documented. It has been postulated that a subset of NTG patients are misclassified due to incorrect intraocular pressure measurements on thin corneas. The aim of this study was to establish whether corneal thickness in NTG differs between patients with vascular risk factors specific to NTG and those without. METHODS: The study comprised a retrospective analysis of 108 eyes of 54 patients with NTG and 54 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Corneal thickness was measured in all patients. Vascular risk factors were recorded. Patients with NTG were divided into two groups depending on the presence (group A) or absence (group B) of vascular risk factors. RESULTS: The mean CCT was 549 +/- 34 microm in patients with POAG and 528 +/- 31 microm in patients with NTG (p = 0.001). Mean CCT was 512 +/- 31 microm in group A (n = 13) and 533 +/- 31 microm in group B (n = 41) (p = 0.034). A total of 40.9% of those with thin corneas (n = 22) had vascular risk factors versus only 12.5% of those with CCT within the normal range (n = 32) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness in NTG was significantly lower than in POAG and corneas were thinner in NTG patients with vascular risk factors than in those without. Vascular risk factors were significantly more common in patients with thin corneas. The finding of reduced corneal thickness in NTG does not obviate the need to consider vascular risk factors in the pathophysiology of the disease.     

Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thicknesses between normal subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

BACKGROUND: While many comparative data are available about central corneal thickness in different types of open angle glaucoma, peripheral corneal thickness has been much less investigated up to now. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the central and peripheral corneal thicknesses in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) to values of normal subjects. PATIENTS: 104 patients with POAG, 20 patients with NTG, 23 patients with PEXG and 127 normal subjects were investigated with the Orbscan II. The central corneal thickness and the peripheral corneal thickness at 3 mm distance from the centre were determined in 4 quadrants. The acoustic equivalent factor of 0.92 was not used. Patients with eye diseases, patients who had undergone eye surgery or wearers of contact lenses were excluded. Differences were analysed with the Bonferroni-adjusted Mann-Whitney U Test for statistical significance. RESULTS: The median central corneal thickness in POAG was 600 +/- 35 microm, in NTG 577 +/- 31 microm, in PEXG 603 +/- 25 microm and in the control group 606 +/- 38 microm. The difference between NTG and the control group was statistically significant (p = 0.01). Superiorly the peripheral corneal thickness was lower in POAG (670 +/- 47 microm) and NTG (639 +/- 37 microm) compared to the control group (686 +/- 46 microm). Nasally the peripheral corneal thickness was lower in POAG (656 +/- 48 microm), NTG (658 +/- 55 microm) and PEXG (642 +/- 47 microm) compared to the control group (677 +/- 46 microm). Temporally and inferiorly there were only small differences compared to the control group. The differences in peripheral corneal thickness were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: In accord with literature data the central corneal thickness was lower in patients with normal tension glaucoma compared to normal subjects. Superiorly and nasally the peripheral corneal thickness was lower in patients with open angle glaucoma than in normal subjects which was, however, not statistically significant. To what extent these characteristics of the corneal architecture are relevant for the pathogenesis of open angle glaucomas has to be clarified in further larger trials.     

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitudes (OPA) in patients with different types of glaucoma, ocular hypertension (OHT), and normal controls (NC) using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and the goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: 906 eyes of 501 adult patients in the following five groups were included in this cross-sectional study: primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma (PXG), OHT, and NC. The following tests were performed simultaneously during a single visit: IOP using DCT and GAT; OPA using DCT and central corneal thickness (CCT) using ultrasound pachymetry. Mixed effects regression models were used to compare the DCT and GAT IOP measurements in the five groups; the effect of CCT on IOP and the relationship between OPA and IOP within each group. RESULTS: DCT consistently had higher IOP values than GAT in POAG, PXG, NTG, and controls (p < 0.001) but not in OHT (p = 0.84). DCT IOP did not change while GAT IOP showed a non-significant increase (p = 0.09) with increased corneal thickness in each group. OPA was found to be highest in OHT (3.61 mmHg) and lowest in the control group (2.86 mmHg) and significantly increased with IOP in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCT measures an IOP that is significantly higher than GAT IOP in glaucoma and control subjects but not in ocular hypertensives. Furthermore, the DCT may measure an IOP that is independent of the CCT, which may not be true for the GAT, which increases with the CCT. OPA was highest in OHT and may be affected by the IOP.     

The relationship between central corneal thickness-adjusted intraocular pressure and glaucomatous visual-field loss.

BACKGROUND: Although measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is increasingly becoming an important component of glaucoma risk analysis, significant controversy exists regarding the benefit of calculating a corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) value from measured IOP and CCT data. METHODS: Three hundred forty-four male subjects were identified from a VA eye clinic with one of the following clinical diagnoses: ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and normal tension glaucoma suspect (NTGS). Using one eye per subject, multivariate logistic regression and correlational analyses were performed to determine relationships between glaucomatous visual-field loss and several glaucoma risk factors, including adjusted IOP values. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify CCT-adjusted IOP values as independent risk factors for development of either NTG or POAG-related glaucomatous visual-field loss. CCT, however, was found to be strongly associated with both NTG and POAG-related visual-field loss. Correlational analysis revealed a weak correlation between Ehlers-adjusted pre-treatment IOP and severity of POAG-related visual-field loss, but no other adjusted IOP values significantly correlated with severity of visual-field loss in either POAG or NTG. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adjusted IOP, as calculated using current algorithms, is not useful within glaucoma risk analysis, since adjusted IOP was unable to predict either presence or severity of glaucomatous visual-field loss in this study. CCT, conversely, was found to be a robust and independent predictor of glaucomatous visual-field loss. These findings, while supporting routine CCT measurements for all glaucoma suspects, do not support routine clinical computation of adjusted IOP values using current algorithms.     

Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) eyes measured by the ocular response analyser (ORA). Methods: This is a prospective, cross‐sectional and comparative clinical trial. The setting was a teaching hospital in Birmingham, England. Patients: 216 eyes with POAG, 68 eyes with NTG and 199 eyes with OHT. Observational procedures: Goldmann applanation tonometry and intraocular pressure (IOP), hysteresis and CRF measured by ORA and central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasonic pachymetery. The main outcome measures were IOP, CCT, hysteresis and CRF. Results: The hysteresis in NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was 9.0 ± 1.9, 9.9 ± 2.1 and 10.2 ± 2.0 mmHg; CRF was 9.1 ± 2.2, 10.6 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.0 mmHg; IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry and ORA was 14.7 ± 2.8 and 15.3 ± 4.2 mmHg, 16.7 ± 4.0 and 16.9 ± 4.6 mmHg and 20.5 ± 4.1 and 20.0 ± 4.5 mmHg; CCT was 526.5 ± 42.2, 537.0 ± 36.0 and 563.4 ± 35.9 µm, respectively. The difference for CRF, IOP and CCT for NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was statistically significant. Conclusion: Hysteresis and CRF were highest in OHT eyes. These factors may prove to be useful measurements of ocular rigidity and may help to understand role of the corneal rigidity in monitoring the progress of conditions such as NTG, POAG and OHT.     

Corneal thickness in glaucoma: an important parameter?

Central corneal thickness was measured by pachometry in 49 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 41 with ocular hypertension (OHT), 14 with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and 48 normal subjects. The mean corneal thickness of the OHT patients was significantly greater than that of the normal control group. The NTG patients, on the other hand, had a cornea on average thinner than the normals. These differences may cause misclassification of normals with a thick cornea as ocular hypertensive eyes or, contrarywise, cause those normals whose IOP is underestimated because of a thin cornea to be classed as NTG patients.     

Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma

BACKGROUND: Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed. METHODS: PCI (IOP/CCT(3)) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT(3) in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI's ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built. RESULTS: Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16-17, 18-19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8. CONCLUSIONS: A PCI range of 120-140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures or=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.     

动态轮廓眼压计在正常眼压性青光眼及原发性开角型青光眼的应用研究

目的:应用动态轮廓眼压计(dynamic contour tonometer,DCT)测量正常眼压性青光眼(normal tension glaucoma,NTG)及原发性开角型青光眼(primary open angle glaucoma,POAG)患者的眼压(intraocular pressure,IOP)及眼脉动幅度值(ocular pulse amplitude,OPA),并探讨影响OPA测量值的相关因素。方法:选取NTG患者20例,POAG患者21例及正常对照组各20例,应用Goldmann压平眼压(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)及DCT测量IOP,同时测量了中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)、眼轴(axial length,AL)、心率(heart rate,HR)、收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)等指标,并探讨GAT,DCT两种眼压计测量的相关性,进而分析OPA测量值的影响因素。结果:三组被检者的IOP,OPA,SBP及DBP差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而CCT,AL及HR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其中OPA值NTG组为(1.7±0.9)mmHg,POAG组为(2.8±0.7)mmHg,正常对照组为(2.4±0.6)mmHg;NTG组与POAG组比较(P=0.001),与正常对照组比较(P=0.005)差异均有统计学意义,POAG组与正常对照组比较(P=0.502)差异无统计学意义;OPA值与IOP,HR及CCT无相关性(P>0.05),与AL,SBP及DBP具有一定的相关性(P<0.05)。结论:NTG患者与POAG患者及正常人的OPA值存在差异,同时OPA值受AL及SBP及DBP影响。     

Corneal thickness and visual field damage in glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: To verify whether there was a significant correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and visual field damage in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: A total of 99 eyes with POAG were consecutively recruited. Patients were classified as glaucomatous based on visual field and optic nerve head damage. All underwent applanation tonometry, Humphrey perimetry, and measurement of CCT with ultrasonic pachymetry. Based on CCT value, the sample was split at the mode in two groups (group 1<535 microm, n=49; group 2>or=535 microm, n=50). RESULTS: Entire cohort: mean CCT 554 microm+/-45.03; mean deviation (MD) -6.68 dB+/-7.32; pattern standard deviation (PSD) 5.33+/-3.75; intraocular pressure (IOP) 17.91+/-4.16 mmHg with treatment. Group 1: CCT was 504.8 microm+/-30.8; MD -9.01 dB+/-8.72; PSD 6.38+/-3.99; IOP 18.02 mmHg+/-4.66. Group 2: mean CCT 574.6 microm+/-35.03; MD -4.39 dB+/-4.70; PSD 4.25+/-3.19; IOP 17.79 mmHg+/-3.57. A significant difference was found between the two groups for both MD and PSD. Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between CCT and PSD (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that patients with a thinner cornea had a worse MD and PSD. As a thinner CCT causes an underestimation of the true IOP, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of POAG or an inadequate estimate of the clinical course despite apparently desirable IOP applanation readings.     

Five-year risk of progression of ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. A population-based study

PURPOSE: To report the progression of ocular hypertension (OHT) to primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) during a 5-year follow up of a population-based sample. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients diagnosed to have OHT and 110 randomly selected normals from a population-based study in 1995 were invited for ocular examination in 2000. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination; including the daytime diurnal variation of intraocular pressure (IOP) and measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT). The "corrected" IOP was used for analysis. Progression to POAG was based on typical optic disc changes with corresponding field defects on automated perimetry. RESULTS: Twenty-five of the 29 persons with OHT who could be contacted were examined. After correcting for CCT, two persons were reclassified as normal. Four of 23 (17.4%; 95% CI: 1.95-32.75) had progressed to POAG. One person amongst the 110 normals progressed to normal tension glaucoma (NTG). The relative risk of progression amongst OHT was 19.1 (95% CI: 2.2-163.4). All those who progressed had bilateral OHT. The mean and peak IOP in those who progressed was 25.4 mm Hg and 29.3 mm Hg compared to 23.9 mm Hg and 25.7 mm Hg in those who did not. Those who progressed had more than 8 mm Hg diurnal variation. The diurnal variation was less than 6 mm Hg in those who did not progress. No patient developed blindness due to glaucoma. CONCLUSION: The 5-year incidence of POAG amongst OHT in this population was 17.4% (3.5% per year). Bilateral OHT, higher peak IOP and large diurnal variation may be the risk factors for progression.     

Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)

OBJECTIVE: Central corneal thickness influences intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. We examined the central corneal thickness of subjects in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) and determined if central corneal thickness is related to race. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand three hundred one OHTS subjects with central corneal thickness measurements. INTERVENTION: Central corneal thickness was determined with ultrasonic pachymeters of the same make and model at all clinical sites of the OHTS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of mean central corneal thickness with race, baseline IOP, refraction, age, gender, systemic hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: Mean central corneal thickness was 573.0 +/- 39.0 microm. Twenty-four percent of the OHTS subjects had central corneal thickness > 600 microm. Mean central corneal thickness for African American subjects (555.7 +/- 40.0 microm; n = 318) was 23 microm thinner than for white subjects (579.0 +/- 37.0 microm; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with greater mean central corneal thickness were younger age, female gender, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: OHTS subjects have thicker corneas than the general population. African American subjects have thinner corneas than white subjects in the study. The effect of central corneal thickness may influence the accuracy of applanation tonometry in the diagnosis, screening, and management of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.     

Central corneal thickness and normal tension glaucoma: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Recently published evidence has identified thinner central corneal thickness (CCT) as a strong predictive factor for the conversion from ocular hypertension (OHT) to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The association between CCT and development of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), however, is less clear. Accordingly, we designed this cross-sectional study to further explore the relationship between CCT and NTG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with a clinical diagnosis of NTG and NTG suspect (NTGS) who were seen from September 2002 through May 2003 at the Albuquerque VA Medical Center eye clinic were identified retrospectively. After eligible subjects were categorized into no, mild, moderate, and advanced visual field loss groups, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analyses were used to determine group differences for several IOP variables, several systemic variables, and CCT. Additional analyses were completed after eligible subjects were recategorized into thin, intermediate, and thick CCT groups. RESULTS: Eighty-four eyes in 84 NTGS subjects and 56 eyes in 56 NTG subjects were studied. Mean CCT was significantly thicker in the no field loss group (NTGS) when compared with all 3 groups with glaucomatous visual field loss (NTG). In multivariate regression analysis, the association between CCT and the presence of NTG-related visual field loss was robust and independent. Conversely, no relationship was found between CCT and severity of NTG-related visual field loss. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes characterized by statistically normal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, we found a significant relationship between CCT and the presence, but not severity, of glaucomatous visual field loss. A prospective study is required to further explore and confirm these relationships.     

Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness

· Purpose: To evaluate whether ocular hypertensive subjects have a higher central corneal thickness than other individuals. · Methods: In this prospective study, 48 subjects with ocular hypertension, 63 patients with open-angle glaucoma, 56 nonglaucomatous patients with diabetes mellitus, and 106 control subjects were evaluated. Corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry, and intraocular pressure was determined by Goldmann applanation tonometry. · Results: Central corneal thickness was significantly higher in the ocular hypertensive subjects, mean ±S.D., 592±39 μm, than in the patients with glaucoma (536±34 μm), the nonglaucomatous patients with diabetes mellitus (550±31 μm), and the normal subjects (545±33 μm), P<0.001. The three latter groups did not vary significantly in central corneal thickness, P>0.05. · Conclusion: In some individuals with increased transcorneal measurements of intraocular pressure, the cornea is thicker than in subjects with normal intraocular pressure readings or patients with glaucoma. It suggests that in ocular hypertensive subjects, corneal pachymetry should be performed to rule out an abnormally thick cornea as a reason for falsely high measurements of intraocular pressure. Received: 14 April 1998 Revised version received: 10 July 1998 Accepted: 23 July 1998     

Central corneal thickness measurement in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a single measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is an adequate sample to aid in glaucoma risk assessment in clinical practice. METHODS: Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry (mean of 15 measurements for each eye) on two separate occasions at least one month apart (range, 33 to 610 days). Eyes with a history of prior incisional surgery or corneal pathology were excluded. RESULTS: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients (43 male, 55 female) were enrolled. Mean age was 61.2 +/- 15.5 years. Mean inter-test period was 276 +/- 124 days. No significant difference in mean CCT was observed between the two visits (549 +/- 41 microm versus 548 +/- 42 microm, P = 0.4, two-tailed, paired t test). Measured CCT values differed by more than 20 microm in 20 eyes (20.4%), whereas CCT difference of at least 40 microm was seen in 5 eyes (5.1%). There was no correlation between the measured or absolute difference in CCT and IOP (r = -0.016, P > 0.43), inter-test time period (r = 0.072, P > 0.23), and glaucoma diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness measurements in this study differed by at least 20 microm in 20% of eyes. This has important implications for risk assessment, management, and follow-up of patients with glaucoma and related disorders. Factors affecting CCT measurement, such as examiner error or true alterations in corneal thickness, require continued investigation.