Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems

OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in the demographic and injury data of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Consecutive case series. SETTINGS: Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems throughout the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 25,054 persons admitted to a Model Spinal Cord Injury Care System within 365 days of injury between 1973 and 1998. RESULTS: Many trends and changes have been noted in the clinical features of patients who have been admitted to the Model SCI Care Systems. Average age at time of injury is rising; persons older than 60 comprise 11.5% of all persons enrolled in the National Database during the 1994-1998 period. Although the overall male-to-female ratio is greater than 4:1, the proportion of males has decreased significantly in recent years. Violence-related injuries have increased dramatically from 13.9% in 1973-1977 to 21.8% in 1994-1998. Since 1973, the proportions of injuries resulting from vehicular crashes and sports declined while injuries from falls increased. Injury continues to occur most commonly in the summer. When age, race, and gender are considered, violence is a more common cause of injury among individuals who are younger, male, or African American. Complete injuries were more common among younger individuals and among men than among older adults and women. CONCLUSION: Trends in the national database provide valuable data for tracking groups at risk for traumatic SCI.     

Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To present Model Spinal Cord Injury System (MSCIS) data on late neurologic recovery after 1 year after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Longitudinal study of neurologic status as determined by annual evaluations at 1 and 5 years postinjury. SETTING: MSCIS centers contributing data on people with traumatic SCI to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database. PARTICIPANTS: People with traumatic SCI (N=987) admitted to an MSCIS between 1988 and 1997 with 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) classification, motor index scores (MIS), motor level, and neurologic level of injury (NLI), measured and compared for changes over time. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (94.4%) who had a neurologically complete injury at 1 year remained complete at 5 years postinjury, with 3.5% improving to AIS grade B, and up to 1.05% each improving to AIS grades C and D. There was a statistically significant change noted for MIS. There were no significant changes for the motor level and NLI over 4 years; however, approximately 20% of subjects improved their motor level and NLI. People with complete and incomplete injuries had similar improvements in motor level, but subjects with an incomplete injury had a greater chance of improvement in NLI and MIS. CONCLUSIONS: There was a small degree of neurologic recovery (between 1 and 5 y postinjury) after a traumatic SCI. Late conversion, between 1 and 5 years, from a neurologically complete to an incomplete injury occurred in 5.6% of cases, but in only up to 2.1% was there a conversion from motor complete to motor incomplete status. Limitations of this study included changes in the ASIA classification during the study and in the intra- and interrater reliability typically seen in longitudinal studies of the ASIA standards. Functional changes were not studied. Knowledge of the degree of late recovery may help in analyzing newer interventions to enhance recovery.     

Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis

OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency and reasons for rehospitalization in persons with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up years and to examine the association between rehospitalization and demographics, neurologic category, payer sources, length of stay (LOS), discharge motor FIM instrument score, and discharge residence. DESIGN: Survey design with analysis of cross-sectional data. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Data for 8668 persons with SCI from 16 MSCIS centers entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1995 and 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MSCIS Forms I and II were used to identify the annual incidence, medical complications, and etiologies of rehospitalizations reported at 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year follow-ups. RESULTS: The leading cause of rehospitalization was diseases of the genitourinary system, including urinary tract infections (UTIs). Diseases of the respiratory system tended to be more likely in patients with tetraplegia (C1-8 American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] grades A, B, C); whereas patients with paraplegia (T1-S5 ASIA grades A, B, C) were more likely to be rehospitalized for pressure ulcers. The rate of rehospitalization was significantly higher at year 1, 5, and 20 for those who were discharged to a skilled nursing facility after acute rehabilitation. Lower motor score using the FIM was predictive of rehospitalization (P=.000). The average LOS per rehospitalization at the year-5 follow-up was approximately 12 days, which is lower than in past MSCIS reports. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in SCI medical management, rehospitalization rates remain high, with an increased incidence in conditions associated with the genitourinary system (including UTIs), respiratory complications (including pneumonia), and diseases of the skin (including pressure ulcers). Acutely injured patients need close follow-up to reduce morbidity and rehospitalizations.     

Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess gender differences in neurologic and functional outcome measures in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Case series. SETTINGS: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: People (N=14,433) admitted to an MSCIS within 30 days of injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor index score, ASIA Impairment Scale, level of injury, and FIM instrument scores after SCI. RESULTS: When examining subjects grouped by severity of injury, changes in ASIA motor index total scores, from system admission to 1-year anniversary, were significantly greater for women than men with either complete ( P =.035) or incomplete ( P =.031) injuries. Functional comparison of men and women, using the FIM motor subscale, revealed that men had higher FIM motor scores at rehabilitation discharge among those with motor-complete injuries, except for those with C1-4 and C6 neurologic levels. Women with motor-incomplete high tetraplegia (C1-4 levels) had higher discharge FIM motor scores than did similarly afflicted men. There were no significant differences in FIM motor scores among men and women with other levels of motor incomplete SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences in SCI were seen in several areas. Women may have more natural neurologic recovery than men; however, for a given level and degree of neurologic injury, men tend to do better functionally than women at time of discharge from rehabilitation. Future prospective study of the effects of estrogen on neurologic recovery and the effects of gender on functional potential are recommended.     

Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems

OBJECTIVE: To present data on neurologic recovery gathered by the Model Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Systems over a 10-year period. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Twenty-one Model SCI Systems. PATIENTS: A total of 3,585 individuals with traumatic SCI admitted between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurologic impairment category; Frankel grade; American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade; motor score. RESULTS: SCI caused by violence is more likely than SCI from nonviolent etiologies to result in a complete injury. Changes in severity of injury were similar using the older Frankel scale and the newer ASIA Impairment Scale. Individuals who were motor-complete with extended zones of sensory preservation but without sacral sparing were less likely to convert to motor-incomplete status than those with sacral sparing (13.3% vs 53.6%; p < .001). Motor score improvements at 1 year were related to severity of injury, with greater increases for better AIS grades except grade D, because of ceiling effects. Individuals with AIS grade B injuries have a mixed prognosis. CONCLUSION: Neurologic recovery after SCI is influenced by etiology and severity of injury. Multicenter studies on prognostic features such as preserved pin sensation in grade B injuries may identify subgroups with similar recovery patterns. Identification of such groups would facilitate clinical trials for neurologic recovery in acute SCI.     

Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES: To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. DESIGN: Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. RESULTS: Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81% at 1 year postinjury to 82.7% at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.     

Research from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems: findings from the current 5-year grant cycle

This issue of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation is dedicated to current research findings of the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) program. The MSCIS grants were established by the Rehabilitation Services Administration in the 1970s. Now administered by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research within the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services in the US Department of Education, the program has included 27 spinal cord injury centers in the United States over the years. In the current 5-year grant cycle (2000-2005), there are 16 designated regional MSCIS centers. In addition to establishing a comprehensive system of care, the grantees contribute patient data to the National Spinal Cord Injury Database (which now contains data on 30,532 subjects with follow-up of up to 30 y). In addition, the MSCIS grants enable the conduct of site-specific and collaborative research projects. To highlight the research findings of the program, the MSCIS have produced a special dissemination effort during each of the previous 5 grant cycles, with this issue of the Archives representing the latest of these endeavors. This article provides a brief history of the MSCIS program and highlights the important findings of the 17 original research articles contained in this issue.     

Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of health, community integration, and economic status with subsequent mortality and life expectancy among persons with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5947 persons injured since 1973 who were enrolled in the National Spinal Cord Injury Database and who were still alive and received an annual evaluation from November 1995 through March 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality was determined by routine follow-up supplemented by information from the Social Security Death Index. A logistic regression model based on the full set of predictor variables was developed to estimate the chance of dying in any given year. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic characteristics and injury severity, health status indicators, measures of community integration, and economic status indicators all had relatively small but statistically significant effects (20%-70% increases) on the likelihood of dying during the next year. Inclusion of these factors may result in higher life expectancy estimates under highly favorable conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas previous reports of the MSCIS data have identified the life expectancies associated with a particular set of demographic (eg, age, gender) and injury-related characteristics (level and completeness of injury; ventilator dependence), the current analysis suggests that consideration of health, economic, and psychosocial factors may make computations of life expectancy more accurate.     

Functional motor preservation below the level of injury in subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A spinal cord injuries

Zariffa J, Curt A, for the EMSCI Study Group, Steeves JD. Functional motor preservation below the level of injury in subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A spinal cord injuries.ObjectiveTo assess how frequently subjects with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A have substantial preserved motor function below the neurologic level of injury, despite having no preserved sensory or motor function at the S4-5 spinal cord segment.DesignAnalysis of the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury database to determine how frequently subjects assessed as AIS A would have been AIS D based on motor scores alone (ie, had scores of ≥3 in at least half of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury [ISNCSCI] key muscles below the neurologic level of injury, despite having no sacral sparing).SettingEighteen European centers.ParticipantsIndividuals with traumatic SCI at any level (total of 2557 assessments).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasureISNCSCI assessments.ResultsOver the first year after SCI (with assessments at approximately 1, 4, 12, 24, and 48wk) and for all rostrocaudal levels of injury, only 3.2% of AIS A assessments were found to meet the AIS D motor score criteria. The percentage was highest for lumbar (16.3%) and lower thoracic (4.4%) SCI. No trends were observed across time points.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the low frequency of individuals with an AIS A classification and high levels of motor function are not a significant concern in subject recruitment for clinical trials, unless the level of SCI is within the lumbar cord.     

Race, employment, and spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES: To examine issues of employment and race for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), by assessing the type of work that was being done before and after injury and by placing this in the context of patterns for the general population. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Centers funded as part of the federally sponsored Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) Project. PARTICIPANTS: Two samples: 5925 African Americans and whites with SCI who are part of the MSCIS and a subset of 577 people with SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, occupational status, employment rate, job census codes, Craig Hospital Assessment and Reporting Technique-Short Form, and Satisfaction With Life Scale. RESULTS: Racial disparities were found in employment rates before injury and at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after SCI. Differences were also found in the types of jobs that were held before SCI with patterns for participants similar to those of African Americans and whites in the general population. No differences were found in the types of jobs held by African Americans and whites with SCI at 1 year after injury. After injury, African Americans had lower economic self-sufficiency scores, regardless of employment status, and lower social integration scores among those who were not employed. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities found in employment patterns among persons with SCI mirrored patterns among the general population.     

Trends in spinal cord injury demographics and treatment outcomes between 1973 and 1986.

A study of the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database on 6,563 persons treated at Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems was conducted to detect demographic and treatment outcome trends over time. Data from the initial hospitalization and first two years postinjury were divided into four time periods based on injury year (1973 to 1977, 1978 to 1980, 1981 to 1983, 1984 to 1986). Between 1973 and 1986, mean age at injury increased, as did the percentage of nonwhites and the percentage of persons with quadriplegia, while the percentage of neurologically complete lesions decreased. There was an increase in long-term use of intermittent catheterization. Ventilator use during hospitalization also increased. Mean lengths of stay for acute care and rehabilitation decreased, although mean inflation-adjusted hospital charges increased. The percentage of persons rehospitalized during the second postinjury year decreased substantially. From 1973 to 1986, for persons admitted to the model system within 24 hours of injury, there was a 66% decrease in the risk of dying within the first two years postinjury. Overall, these data document changing demographics and treatment practices as well as an improved prognosis for persons with spinal cord injuries.     

Respiratory care in spinal cord injury with associated traumatic brain injury: bridging the gap in critical care nursing interventions.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating and challenging condition. The events that lead to SCI, such as road traffic accidents, falls, sports and violence [Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 5 (1999) 83], are also the common aetiologies of traumatic brain injury (TBI). It's not surprising then, that 20-50% of those with cervical SCI have TBI [J. Trauma 46 (1999) 450]. The literature pertaining to the management of either injury in isolation is vast, but lacking where the two conditions are experienced together and require distinct adaptations to interventions. Consequently, a gap in the literature exists. This paper focuses on those patients with SCI of the cervical spine with associated head injury, and pay particular attention to respiratory difficulties, and presents interventions required to minimise and treat the effects of such pulmonary compromise.     

Model Spinal Cord Injury System trends, and implications for the future

In the 25 years since the federally designated Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems program was started, many changes have occurred. The systems have increased in number and location and have changed in composition. Data are available on approximately 19,000 acutely injured traumatic spinal cord injured individuals, with more than 117,000 total records. This volume of data allows analysis of many trends affecting the care of people with spinal cord injuries. The time span covered by the database allows comparison of various time periods, including the most recent decade--during which managed care has emerged as a dominant force in health care evolution. This article summarizes these trends, based on information in the articles in this special issue devoted to the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems. Finally, this article offers an analysis of future implications for SCI care in general and the federally designated Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems program in particular.     

Economics of managed care in spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To determine and describe trends in economic variables related to the care of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and significant changes in these trends coincident with major developments in medical care cost control. DATA SOURCES: Data from the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC) database were used to review the economic trends in SCI management from 1973 to 1998 and their relation to managed care and other health care cost-containment measures. A panel of SCI health care specialists was interviewed to determine the appropriate data variables to be reviewed. The Shepherd Center Care Health Management Program, Atlanta, GA, is presented as an example of a fiscally successful managed care program for patients with SCI. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the NSCISC database for the years studied were extracted and converted to a form suitable for analysis by means of the statistical software SAS. DATA SYNTHESIS: Statistical techniques included multiple regression analysis, logistic regression analysis, and model selection methods. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in economic variables, in the care of individuals with SCI show changes coincident with the introduction of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) and managed care as models for provider reimbursement. Significant changes occurred in acute care charges, rehabilitation charges, length of stay, rehospitalization 1 year postinjury, time from injury to admission to a Model System, and discharges to a nursing home.     

Quality of life after spinal cord injury caused by gunshot.

OBJECTIVE: To determine what effect gunshot-caused spinal cord injury (SCI) has on self-reported quality of life (QOL) and on the frequency of pain sufficient to interfere with day-to-day activities. DESIGN: Follow-up, case-control design. SETTING: Analysis of data obtained from the (US) National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center from 18 funded Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with traumatic onset SCI (n = 1901). From these, 111 persons with gunshot-caused SCI were matched to persons with nongunshot SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and an individual pain item from the SF-12. RESULTS: No between-group differences were found on any of the QOL outcome measures. In contrast, those with SCI caused by gunshot reported that pain more frequently interfered with day-to-day activities than the matched comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: SCI caused by gunshot appears largely unrelated to QOL, after controlling for demographic and medical characteristics associated with this group. Gunshot as a mechanism of SCI may place individuals at an increased risk of subsequent development of pain that interferes with activities of daily living.     

Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare neurologic, medical, and functional outcomes of patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing early (<24 h and 24-72 h) and late (>72 h) surgical spine intervention versus those treated nonsurgically. DESIGN: Retrospective case series comparing outcomes by surgical and nonsurgical groups during acute care, rehabilitation, and at 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Multicenter National Spinal Cord Injury Database. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with acute, nonpenetrating, traumatic SCI from 1995 to 2000, admitted in the first 24 hours after injury. Surgical spinal intervention was likely secondary to nature of injury and the need for spinal stabilization. Interventions Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in neurologic outcomes (motor and sensory levels, motor index score, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS]), medical complications (pneumonia and atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, rehospitalization), and functional outcomes (acute and rehabilitation length of stay [LOS], hospital charges, FIM instrument score, FIM motor efficiency scores). RESULTS: Subjects in the early surgery group were more likely ( P <.05) to be women, have paraplegia, and have SCI caused by motor vehicle collisions. The nonsurgical group was more likely ( P <.05) to have an older mean age and more incomplete injuries. ASIA motor index improvements (from admission to 1-y follow-up) were more likely ( P <.05) in the nonsurgical groups, as compared with the surgical groups. Those with late surgery had significantly ( P <.05) increased acute care and total LOS and hospital charges along with higher incidence of pneumonia and atelectasis. No differences between groups were found for changes in neurologic levels, AIS grade, or FIM motor efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: ASIA motor index improvements were noted in the nonsurgery group, though likely related to increased incompleteness of injuries within this group. Early versus late spinal surgery was associated with shorter LOS and reduced pulmonary complications, however, no differences in neurologic or functional improvements were noted between early or late surgical groups.     

Predictors of personal care assistance for people with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictors of personal care assistance (PCA) use in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Follow-up of individuals crossing their 1st, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, or 25th anniversary of injury who underwent their initial rehabilitation at a Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2154 participants (2547 records) who met the inclusion criteria for the National Spinal Cord Injury Database and had valid values for the main outcome measures. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily hours of paid, unpaid, and occasional PCA services. RESULTS: Differences in an interval version of the motor portion of the FIM trade mark instrument accounted for 26.3% of the variance in total PCA hours, Model Systems differences accounted for 9.3%, and no other predictor accounted for more than 2.1% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Activities of daily living functioning, as measured by the motor portion of the FIM, was the strongest predictor of PCA use among people with SCI.     

Gait training in human spinal cord injury using electromechanical systems: effect of device type and patient characteristics

Benito-Penalva J, Edwards DJ, Opisso E, Cortes M, Lopez-Blazquez R, Murillo N, Costa U, Tormos JM, Vidal-Samsó J, Valls-Solé J, European Multicenter Study about Human Spinal Cord Injury Study Group, Medina J. Gait training in human spinal cord injury using electromechanical systems: effect of device type and patient characteristics.ObjectiveTo report the clinical improvements in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients associated with intensive gait training using electromechanical systems according to patient characteristics.DesignProspective longitudinal study.SettingInpatient SCI rehabilitation center.ParticipantsAdults with SCI (n=130).InterventionPatients received locomotor training with 2 different electromechanical devices, 5 days per week for 8 weeks.Main Outcome MeasuresLower-extremity motor score, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, and 10-meter walking test data were collected at the baseline, midpoint, and end of the program. Patients were stratified according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) category, time since injury, and injury etiology. A subgroup of traumatic ASIA grade C and D patients were compared with data obtained from the European Multicenter Study about Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI).ResultsOne hundred and five patients completed the program. Significant gains in lower-limb motor function and gait were observed for both types of electromechanical device systems, to a similar degree. The greatest rate of improvement was shown in the motor incomplete SCI patients, and for patients <6 months postinjury. The positive response associated with training was not affected by injury etiology, age, sex, or lesion level. The trajectory of improvement was significantly enhanced relative to patients receiving the conventional standard of care without electromechanical systems (EM-SCI).ConclusionsThe use of electromechanical systems for intensive gait training in SCI is associated with a marked improvement in lower-limb motor function and gait across a diverse range of patients and is most evident in motor incomplete patients, and for patients who begin the regimen early in the recovery process.     

Medical procedures, complications, and outcomes for patients with spinal cord injury: A multicenter investigation comparing African Americans and whites

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of race on rehabilitation outcomes for a matched sample of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: African Americans and whites with SCI were matched based on age group, level and completeness of injury, and sponsor of care to retrospectively analyze the impact of race. SETTING: Eighteen medical centers in the federally sponsored Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems project. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 628 adults with SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical procedures and complications; American Spinal Injury Association motor index, and FIMT instrument scores at admission and discharge; and discharge dispositions. RESULTS: Analysis revealed race-related differences in spinal surgeries, laparotomies, traction during acute care, and method of bladder management at discharge. In most cases, these were explained by cause of injury rather than direct affects of race. No differences were found with regard to medical complications functional outcomes, or discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: Although differences exist in the medical procedures given to African Americans and whites with SCI, they are generally accounted for by cause of injury rather than the direct affects of race.