Serum KL-6 level is a useful biomarker for evaluating the severity of coronavirus disease 2019

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently spreading worldwide. This study examined whether serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) level is a useful biomarker for evaluating the severity of COVID-19.MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between February 1, 2020, and May 15, 2020. Patients were divided into four categories based on clinical and radiological findings: mild, moderate, severe, and critical. Patients who presented with a mild or moderate illness and patients who started with or worsened to a severe or critical illness were classified as the non-severe and severe groups, respectively. The two groups were compared for patient characteristics, including serum KL-6 levels. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the optimum cut-off value of serum KL-6 level to evaluate COVID-19 severity.ResultsA total of 54 patients were enrolled, including 33 in the non-severe group and 21 in the severe group, of which four died. Compared with those in the non-severe group, more patients in the severe group were significantly older and had comorbidities. Serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in the severe group than in the non-severe group both at diagnosis (median, 338 U/mL) and at peak levels within one week after diagnosis (median, 781 U/mL) (both p < 0.001). Serum KL-6 value at peak level (371 U/mL) was used as the optimal cut-off to evaluate disease severity (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 96.6%).ConclusionsSerum KL-6 levels were significantly elevated in severe COVID-19 and is useful for evaluating its severity.     

Serum gasdermin D levels are associated with the chest computed tomography findings and severity of COVID-19

BackgroundThe role of programmed cell death, especially pyroptosis and apoptosis, in unfavorable immune responses in COVID-19 remains to be elucidated.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis to investigate the association between the serum gasdermin D (GSDMD) levels, a pyroptotic marker, and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 fragment (M30), an apoptotic marker, and the clinical status and abnormal chest computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with COVID-19.ResultsIn this study, 46 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were divided into the following three groups according to the disease severity: mild to moderate group (n = 10), severe group (n = 14), and critical group (n = 22). The serum GSDMD levels were higher in the critical group than in the mild to moderate group (P = 0.016). In contrast, serum M30 levels were lower in the critical group than in the severe group (P = 0.048). Patients who required mechanical ventilation or died had higher serum GSDMD levels than those who did not (P = 0.007). Area of consolidation only and of ground glass opacity plus consolidation positively correlated with serum GSDMD levels (r = 0.56, P < 0.001 and r = 0.53, P < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionHigher serum GSDMD levels are associated with critical respiratory status and the consolidation area on chest CT in patients with COVID-19, suggesting that excessive activation of pyroptosis may affect the clinical manifestations in patients with COVID-19.     

IFN-λ3 and CCL17 as predictors of disease progression in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: A cohort study in a real-world setting

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed hospitals worldwide. In Japan, serum interferon lambda 3 (IFN-λ3) and C–C motif ligand (CCL) 17 levels have been used as predictive markers for disease progression to severe COVID-19. However, the relationship between these predictive markers and the disease progression of COVID-19 has not been well evaluated. We retrospectively evaluated the patient characteristics, serum IFN-λ3 and CCL17 levels, and comorbidities of 92 patients with mild (n = 20) and moderate (n = 72) COVID-19 who were hospitalized in our institution. The results of the multivariable analysis showed that the positive rates of IFN-λ3, CCL17, and the combination of these markers were significantly elevated in patients with progressed COVID-19. Furthermore, patients who were negative for both markers did not experience disease progression. This study illustrates the importance of measuring these markers to predict disease severity and progression in patients with COVID-19.     

Role of serum surfactant protein-D as a prognostic predictor in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BackgroundSerum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) are candidate diagnostic and activity markers for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), although their correlation with prognosis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic usefulness of serum KL-6 and SP-D in patients with fibrotic HP.MethodsThis was a retrospective medical record review of 185 patients with fibrotic HP at a single center from 2005 to 2019. The baseline and minimum serum KL-6 and SP-D levels over two years were recorded. The contribution of KL-6 and SP-D levels to the incidence of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) and mortality were evaluated using multivariate analysis.ResultsThe respective baseline and minimum levels were 1441 and 808 U/ml for KL-6 and 254 and 132 ng/mL for SP-D. A high minimum SP-D level was significantly associated with a high incidence of PF-ILD by logistic regression, independent of baseline forced vital capacity and honeycombing. Similarly, a high minimum SP-D level was significantly associated with high mortality by Cox proportional hazard model analysis. The stratified minimum SP-D levels of <100, 100–200, and >200 revealed significantly distinct groups in the entire cohort, with PF-ILD incidence rates of 28%, 48%, and 74% and median survival times of 120, 74, and 45 months, respectively.ConclusionsHigh minimum SP-D levels over two years were correlated with an unfavorable prognosis in our cohort. Patient with consistently high SP-D levels during the clinical course may have a poor prognosis and be a candidate for early treatment intensification.     

Elevated interleukin levels are associated with higher severity and mortality in COVID 19 – A systematic review,meta-analysis,and meta-regression

Background and aimsCOVID 19 pneumonia commonly leads to ARDS. The occurrence of ARDS in COVID 19 patients is thought to occur secondary to an exaggerated immunologic response. In this meta-analysis, we aim to comprehensively study the various levels of immunological parameters in patients with COVID 19.Materials and methodsWe performed a systematic literature search from PubMed, EuropePMC, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Database, and medRxiv with the search terms, “COVID-19” and “Interleukin”. The outcome of interest was prognosis in COVID 19 patients.ResultsWe performed meta analysis of 16 studies. Higher counts of CD4 and CD8 with Lower Levels of TNF-a, IL2R, IL6, IL8 were observed on patients with good prognosis compared to patients with poor prognosis; −0.57 (pg/mL) (−1.10, −0.04, p = 0.04), (I² 91%, p < 0.001); −579.84 (U/mL) (−930.11, −229.57, p < 0.001), (I² 96%, p < 0.001); −1.49 (pg/mL) (−1.97, −1.01, p < 0.001), (I² 94%, p < 0.001); −0.80 (pg/mL) (−1.21, −0.40, p < 0.001), (I2 79%, p < 0.001); −2.51 (pg/mL) (−3.64, −1.38, p < 0.00001), (I² 98%, p < 0.001) respectively. Meta-regression showed age and hypertension (coefficient: 1.99, and −1.57, p = 0.005, and 0.006) significantly influenced association between IL-6 and poor outcome.ConclusionElevated immune response to coronavirus occurs in COVID 19 patients. Higher counts of CD4 and CD8 were seen in patients with good prognosis compared to patients with poor prognosis, with Lower levels of TNF-a, IL2R, IL6, IL8, were observed in patients with good prognosis compared to patients with poor prognosis.     

Changes in serum KL-6 levels during short-term strict antigen avoidance are associated with the prognosis of patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by avian antigens

BackgroundBird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis (BRHP) is the most common type of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Antigen avoidance (AA) is a key step in the diagnosis and management of HP, but not all fibrotic HP patients improve through AA. Because of the poor prognosis of fibrotic HP, predictive biomarkers to identify patients showing rapid progression during AA are urgently needed.MethodsFrom a retrospective review of the medical records of 1941 patients with interstitial lung disease, 75 cases of fibrotic BRHP confirmed by a provocation test or surgical lung biopsy were identified. To identify potential prognostic markers obtained at or around diagnosis, physiological and serological variables at diagnosis and the relative changes in those variables during strict AA were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards models with log-rank testing were used to compare the associations between these variables and survival.ResultsUnivariate analyses showed that gender, smoking status, and the relative change in the serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) were associated with prognosis (P = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.02, respectively), but the presence of honeycombing and the forced vital capacity were not associated with survival. The relative change in KL-6 levels (greater than vs. less than a 10% decrease) was significantly associated with survival in a stratified analysis (73.9 vs. 34.9 months; P = 0.04).ConclusionsThe relative change in KL-6 levels is associated with the prognosis of patients with fibrotic BRHP independent of previously identified prognostic biomarkers. This finding could help pulmonologists identify fibrotic BRHP patients that are likely to show rapid progression.     

Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in patients with COVID-19

Background and study aimAnti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) have been described in many autoimmune diseases (AIDs). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could trigger AIDs. This study aimed to determine the frequency of ASCA in patients with COVID-19.Patients and methodsThis study included 88 adult patients with severe COVID-19, 51 mild COVID-19, and 160 healthy blood donors. ASCA of isotype immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgA were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsThe frequency of ASCA (IgG or IgA) was significantly higher in patients with severe COVID-19 (21.6 % vs 3.7 %, p < 10^?3) and in patients with mild COVID-19 than in the healthy controls (13.7 % vs 3.7 %, p = 0.03). ASCA-IgA was significantly more frequent in patients with severe COVID-19 than in healthy controls (15.9 % vs 0.6 %, p < 10^?3). ASCA-IgG was significantly more frequent in patients with mild COVID-19 than in healthy controls (13.7 % vs 3.1 %, p = 0.02). ASCA (IgG or IgA) were more frequent in severe than in mild COVID-19, but the difference was not statistically significant (21.6 % vs 13.7 %). ASCA-IgA was significantly more frequent in patients with severe than those with mild COVID-19 (15.9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.003). The mean ASCA-IgG and ASCA-IgA levels were significantly higher in patients with severe COVID-19 than in healthy controls (5.8 U/mL ± 11.8 vs 2.3 U/mL ± 2.8, p < 10^?3 and 9.2 U/mL ± 21.5 vs 3.4 U/mL ± 1.7, respectively, p < 10^?3). The mean ASCA-IgG levels were significantly higher in patients with mild COVID-19 than in healthy controls (6.2 U/mL ± 12.9 vs 2.3 U/mL ± 2.8, p < 10^?3). The mean ASCA-IgA levels were significantly higher in patients with severe than in those with mild COVID-19 (9.2 U/mL ± 21.5 vs 2.6 U/mL ± 1.2, p = 0.03).ConclusionASCA was more frequent in patients with COVID-19 than in healthy controls.     

Predictive factors for the recurrence of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody-associated interstitial lung disease

BackgroundAnti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is characterized by the presence of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody and ASS-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) often recurs. The effectiveness of remission induction therapy with corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and the predictive factors for ASS-ILD recurrence were examined.MethodsWe retrospectively identified consecutive patients with ASS-ILD treated with corticosteroids and CNI during 2006–2017 and evaluated the predictive factors for recurrence using logistic regression analysis.ResultsOf the 57 patients included in this study, 54 (94.7%) exhibited improved response to remission induction therapy. There were 32 recurrence patients during maintenance therapy. The median period until recurrence was 27 months. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. In the recurrence group, respiratory function and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score deteriorated over the clinical course. The Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) level changed with disease behavior. The multivariate analysis revealed that KL-6 increase rate from remission (odds ratio: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.17–8.86, p = 0.02) and CNI discontinuation (odds ratio: 8.09, 95% CI: 1.39–47.09, p = 0.02) were independent predictive factors for recurrence. The receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off point of KL-6 increase rate was 2.0. The positive predictive values of the KL-6 increase rate from remission of >2.0 and CNI discontinuation were 90.0 and 88.9%, respectively. The CNI treatment duration and recurrence were not related.ConclusionsRecurrence influenced long-term deterioration. KL-6 was a serum biomarker for disease behavior and recurrence prediction. The results suggest the importance of CNI continuation.     

Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Patients With COVID-19

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether right ventricular longitudinal strain (RVLS) was independently predictive of higher mortality in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).BackgroundRVLS obtained from 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography has been recently demonstrated to be a more accurate and sensitive tool to estimate right ventricular (RV) function. The prognostic value of RVLS in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown.MethodsOne hundred twenty consecutive patients with COVID-19 who underwent echocardiographic examinations were enrolled in our study. Conventional RV functional parameters, including RV fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and tricuspid tissue Doppler annular velocity, were obtained. RVLS was determined using 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. RV function was categorized in tertiles of RVLS.ResultsCompared with patients in the highest RVLS tertile, those in the lowest tertile were more likely to have higher heart rate; elevated levels of D-dimer and C-reactive protein; more high-flow oxygen and invasive mechanical ventilation therapy; higher incidence of acute heart injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and deep vein thrombosis; and higher mortality. After a median follow-up period of 51 days, 18 patients died. Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors displayed enlarged right heart chambers, diminished RV function, and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Male sex, acute respiratory distress syndrome, RVLS, RV fractional area change, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were significant univariate predictors of higher risk for mortality (p < 0.05 for all). A Cox model using RVLS (hazard ratio: 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15 to 1.53; p < 0.001; Akaike information criterion = 129; C-index = 0.89) was found to predict higher mortality more accurately than a model with RV fractional area change (Akaike information criterion = 142, C-index = 0.84) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (Akaike information criterion = 144, C-index = 0.83). The best cutoff value of RVLS for prediction of outcome was −23% (AUC: 0.87; p < 0.001; sensitivity, 94.4%; specificity, 64.7%).ConclusionsRVLS is a powerful predictor of higher mortality in patients with COVID-19. These results support the application of RVLS to identify higher risk patients with COVID-19.     

Clinical features of chronic summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis and proposition of diagnostic criteria

BackgroundTrichosporon asahii (T. asahii) causes chronic summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis (C-SHP); however, little is known about the clinical features of this condition. We aimed to elucidate the clinical features of C-SHP and propose practical diagnostic criteria for C-SHP based on the presence of serum anti-T. asahii antibody (TaAb).MethodsPatients diagnosed with C-SHP and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between January 2010 and May 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical findings were compared between the two groups. Criteria for C-SHP were proposed on the basis of significant characteristics and applied to the development and validation cohorts.ResultsThirty-one patients with C-SHP and 26 with TaAb-negative IPF were identified. C-SHP patients were more likely to live in wooden houses; their serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and serum surfactant protein-D (SP-D) levels were higher than those of IPF patients. C-SHP patients were more likely to have subpleural consolidation, micronodules, and extensive ground-glass opacification on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The following 3 items were considered to have diagnostic value: I) TaAb positivity; II) an HRCT pattern consistent with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, including mosaic attenuation or micronodules; and III) elevated serum biomarker levels (KL-6 > 1500 U/mL or SP-D > 250 ng/mL). We defined cases satisfying I) and II) as “probable C-SHP” and those satisfying all 3 criteria as “confident clinical diagnosis of C-SHP”. The areas under the receiver-operating curve were 0.965 and 0.993 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively, which suggested that these criteria had good discriminative ability in clinical evaluations.ConclusionsClinical features could be useful for distinguishing C-SHP from IPF and other etiologies of ILDs.     

Glycemic control metrics using flash glucose monitoring and hospital complications in patients with COVID-19

Background and aimsFew studies have reported on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the Covid-19 pandemic. We aimed to examine glycemic control metrics using flash glucose monitoring during insulin treatment and the clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.MethodsProspective, single-center cohort of adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycemia and COVID-19 infection treated with basal bolus insulin regimen. Glycemic control was assessed with the use of intermittent Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring during the hospital stay. Outcome of interest were time in range [TIR], time above [TAR] and below [TBR] range, glycemic variability [coefficient of variation [% CV]), and differences in a composite of complications including ICU admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury.ResultsA total of 60 patients were included (44 known diabetes and 16 new onset hyperglycemia). In total 190,080 data points of CGM were available, of which 72.5% of values were within the target area [TIR (70–180 mg/dL)], 22% TAR (>180 mg/dL), and 3% were TBR (<70 mg/dL). During treatment, the coefficient of variation (% CV) was 30%. There were no association with TIR, but patients with TAR >180 mg/dl had higher rates of a composite of complications (22.5% vs 16%, p = 0.04).ConclusionsBasal bolus insulin regimen was safe and effective in achieving inpatient glycemic control in most patients with COVID-19. The association between TAR and complications indicates the need for improved inpatient glycemic control in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.     

Decrease in hemoglobin level predicts increased risk for severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia

BackgroundIn December 2019, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China, and has since spread throughout the world. This study aimed to investigate the association between the change in laboratory markers during the three days after pneumonia diagnosis and severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.MethodsData of 23 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, admitted to the Kumamoto City Hospital between February and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAmong the 23 patients, eight patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) (MV group), and the remaining 15 comprised the non-MV group. The levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin (Alb) decreased in the MV group during the three days after pneumonia diagnosis more than in the non-MV group (median Hb: 1.40 vs. ?0.10 g/dL, P = 0.015; median Alb: 0.85 vs. ?0.30 g/dL, P = 0.020). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the decrease in Hb was associated with receiving MV care (odds ratio: 0.313, 95% confidence interval: 0.100–0.976, P = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that the optimal cut-off value for the decrease in Hb level was ?1.25 g/dL, with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.867 and 0.750, respectively.ConclusionsThe decrease in Hb level during the short period after pneumonia diagnosis might be a predictor of worsening pneumonia in COVID-19 patients.     

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are associated with poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19

Background and aimsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the sole causative agent of coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19).Methods and resultsWe performed a retrospective single-center study of consecutively admitted patients between March 1st and May 15th^, 2020, with a definitive diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary end-point was to evaluate the association of lipid markers with 30-days all-cause mortality in COVID-19.A total of 654 patients were enrolled, with an estimated 30-day mortality of 22.8% (149 patients). Non-survivors had lower total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels during the entire course of the disease. Both showed a significant inverse correlation with inflammatory markers and a positive correlation with lymphocyte count. In a multivariate analysis, LDL-c ≤ 69 mg/dl (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–3.31), C-reactive protein >88 mg/dl (HR 2.44; 95% CI, 1.41–4.23) and lymphopenia <1000 (HR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.91–3.78) at admission were independently associated with 30-day mortality. This association was maintained 7 days after admission. Survivors presented with complete normalization of their lipid profiles on short-term follow-up.ConclusionHypolipidemia in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be secondary to an immune-inflammatory response, with complete recovery in survivors. Low LDL-c serum levels are independently associated with higher 30-day mortality in COVID-19 patients.     

J-shaped relationship between serum zinc levels and the severity of hepatic necro-inflammation in patients with MAFLD

Background and aimsZinc is an essential trace element that plays an important role in maintaining health, and affecting gene expression, signal transduction and regulation of apoptosis. It is uncertain whether serum zinc levels are altered in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We aimed to investigate the association between serum zinc levels and the severity of hepatic necro-inflammation (HN) in patients with MAFLD.Methods and resultsLiver disease severity was graded histologically using the NAFLD activity score. HN was defined as the sum of ballooning and lobular inflammation. We used a smooth function regression model to analyze the relationship between serum zinc levels and HN. A total of 561 (76.5% men) patients with biopsy-confirmed MAFLD were enrolled. They had a mean age of 41.3 years, and a mean serum zinc level of 17.0 ± 4.1 μmol/L. Compared to those with mild hepatic necro-inflammation (MHN, grades 0–2; n = 286), patients with severe hepatic necro-inflammation (SHN, grades 3–5; n = 275) had lower serum zinc concentrations (16.3 ± 4.2 vs. 17.6 ± 4.0 μmol/L; p < 0.001). However, a threshold saturation effect analysis showed that there was an inflection in serum zinc levels at 24 μmol/L. After adjustment for potential confounders, serum zinc levels <24 μmol/L were inversely associated with SHN (adjusted-odds ratio 0.88, 95%CI 0.83–0.93; p < 0.001), whereas serum zinc levels >24 μmol/L were positively associated with SHN (adjusted-odds ratio 1.42, 95%CI: 1.03–1.97; p = 0.035).ConclusionsThere is a J-shaped relationship between serum zinc levels and the severity of hepatic necro-inflammation in patients with biopsy-proven MAFLD.     

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Osaka,Japan: Comparison of the first–third waves with the fourth wave

BackgroundThe fourth wave of COVID-19 in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, caused a medical crisis. Here, we aim to identify the risk factors for COVID-19 severity and compare patients between the first–third waves and the fourth wave.MethodsWe performed an observational retrospective study of COVID-19 cases at the National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center.ResultsWe identified 404 patients (median age: 71.0 years [interquartile range: 56.0–80.0]), of whom 199 (49.1%) had mild disease, 142 (35.2%) had moderate disease, and 63 (15.6%) had severe disease. The overall mortality rate was 5.4% (22/404). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, cardiovascular disease, fever, dyspnea, and several inflammatory biomarkers were independent risk factors for moderate to severe disease. For every 1 mg/dL increase in C-reactive protein, 10 IU/L increase in lactate dehydrogenase, and 100 ng/mL increase in ferritin, the risk for moderate to severe disease increased by 18.3%, 12.9%, and 8.9%, respectively. Overall disease severity in the fourth wave was higher than in the first–third waves. However, there was no significant difference in mortality. Because of a shortage of beds, four of the 28 severe patients (14.3%) in the fourth wave could not be transferred to the advanced hospital.ConclusionsCardiovascular disease, fever, dyspnea, and several inflammatory biomarkers were risk factors for moderate to severe COVID-19 in our cohort. During the fourth wave, COVID-19 severity worsened, increasing the number of patients who could not be transferred to beds for severe cases, resulting in a medical crisis in Osaka.     

Periostin as a predictor of prognosis in chronic bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BackgroundPeriostin is an established biomarker of Th2 immune response and fibrogenesis. Recent research has indicated that periostin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. To clarify the relationship between periostin and pathogenesis in chronic bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and to reveal the usefulness of serum periostin levels in diagnosing and managing chronic bird-related HP.MethodsWe measured serum periostin in 63 patients with chronic bird-related HP, 13 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and 113 healthy volunteers. We investigated the relationship between serum periostin and clinical parameters, and evaluated if the baseline serum periostin could predict the prognosis.ResultsSerum periostin was significantly higher in patients with chronic bird-related HP compared to the healthy volunteers. In chronic bird-related HP, serum periostin had significant positive correlations with serum KL-6 levels, the CD4/CD8 ratio in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and fibrosis score on HRCT, and a significant negative correlation with the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide. Chronic bird-related HP patients with serum periostin levels exceeding ≥92.5 ng/mL and ≥89.5 ng/mL had a significantly worse prognosis and significantly higher frequency of acute exacerbation, respectively. Higher serum periostin (92.5 ng/mL or higher; binary response for serum periostin) was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsSerum periostin may reflect the extent of lung fibrosis and play an important role in pathogenesis of chronic bird-related HP. Elevated serum periostin could be a predictor of prognosis in patients with chronic bird-related HP.     

Same-Day Discharge Post–Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Multicenter PROTECT TAVR Study

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of same-day discharge (SDD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) during the COVID-19 pandemic.BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant stress on health care systems worldwide. SDD in highly selected TAVR patients can facilitate the provision of essential cardiovascular care while managing competing COVID-19 resource demands.MethodsPatient selection for SDD was at the discretion of the local multidisciplinary heart team, across 7 international sites. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause readmission, major vascular complications, and new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.ResultsFrom March 2020 to August 2021, 124 of 2,100 patients who underwent elective transfemoral TAVR were selected for SDD. The average age was 78.9 ± 7.8 years, the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 2.4 (IQR: 1.4-4.2), and 32.3% (n = 40) had preexisting PPMs. There were no major vascular complications, strokes, or deaths during the index admission. One patient (0.8%) required PPM implantation for complete heart block and was discharged the same day. No patient required a PPM between discharge home and 30-day follow-up. The composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause readmission, major vascular complications, and new PPM at 30 days occurred in 5.7% patients (n = 6 of 106).ConclusionsSDD post-TAVR is safe and feasible in selected patients at low risk for adverse clinical events postdischarge. This strategy may have a potential role in highly selected patients even when the COVID-19 pandemic abates.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 and influenza patients on ECMO

BackgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a valuable rescue therapy to treat refractory hypoxemia caused by influenza. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ECMO between COVID-19 and influenza.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 1, 2021. The included studies compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ECMO between adults with COVID-19 and those with influenza.ResultsThe study included four retrospective cohorts involving a total of 129 patients with COVID-19 and 140 with influenza who were treated using ECMO. Clinical characteristics were similar between the COVID-19 and influenza groups, including body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and immunocompromised status. A higher proportion of patients with COVID-19 on ECMO were male (75.9% vs. 62.9%; P = 0.04). There was no difference between the groups in terms of illness severity based on sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score or serum pH. Patients with COVID-19 had a longer mean duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO (6.63 vs. 3.38 days; P < 0.01). The pooled mortality rate was 43.8%. The mean ECMO duration (14.13 vs. 12.55 days; P = 0.25) and mortality rate (42.6% vs. 45.0%; P = 0.99) were comparable between the groups.ConclusionClinical characteristics, ECMO duration, and mortality were comparable between patients with COVID-19 and those with influenza who required ECMO to treat refractory hypoxemia. The duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO did not influence outcomes. Patients with COVID-19 benefit from ECMO salvage therapy similarly to those with influenza.     

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter,retrospective, cross-sectional study in Japan

BackgroundThere are many commercially available automated assays for assessing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immune responses; however, owing to insufficient data, their validities remain unknown. Here, we examined antibody responses during acute-phase COVID-19 using four assays that detect anti-spike protein IgM (S-IgM), anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG (N-IgG), anti-spike protein total Ig (S-total Ig), and anti-spike protein IgG (S-IgG).MethodsWe measured antibody levels in 1154 serum samples collected from 286 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 by a gene amplification method between February and December 2020 in Japan. Sera from 860 healthcare workers were used as negative controls.ResultsThe antibody positivity rates increased on week 2, peaked, and then started to plateau by the beginning of week 3 after symptom onset. On week 1, there were some significant differences in seropositivity rates between assays (p = 0.032): 14.9% (11.0%–19.4%) for S-IgM and 8.9% (6.0%–12.7%) for N-IgG. The seropositivity for the S-total Ig (10.6% [7.3%–14.6%]) assay was considerably better than that for the S-IgG (6.9% [4.3%–10.4%]) assay, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.150). The levels of S-IgM antibodies and the three others peaked on weeks 3 and 5, respectively. All four assays showed high specificities (>99%).ConclusionsAll four assays had good specificities and were suitable for seropositivity detection after week 3 of symptom onset. Assays of IgM alone or total Ig (containing IgM) were better than those of IgG alone as an adjunct serological test for early-stage COVID-19 diagnosis, albeit the use of a serological assay alone is insufficient.     

Serum S100A8 and S100A9 as prognostic biomarkers in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BackgroundAcute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a devastating and life-threatening condition during its clinical course. Biomarkers for precisely anticipating the prognosis of AE-IPF remain to be fully established. The objective of this study was to clarify whether S100A8 and S100A9, which are calcium-binding proteins mainly produced by activated neutrophils, are significant prognostic biomarkers in AE-IPF.MethodsThirty-seven patients with AE-IPF who were diagnosed and treated at our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. The serum levels of S100A8 and S100A9 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the relationships between these levels and clinical parameters or prognosis were evaluated.ResultsThe serum levels of S100A8 (median 386.5 ng/mL) and S100A9 (median 60.2 ng/mL) in patients with AE-IPF were significantly higher than those in age-matched healthy controls and in patients at IPF diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all combinations). The serum levels of S100A8 negatively correlated with percent forced vital capacity (r = −0.356, p = 0.049) and positively correlated with peripheral white blood cell number (r = 0.509, p = 0.002). Immunohistochemical staining of autopsy lung specimens showed that neutrophils, present mainly in the alveolar septum, were positive for S100A8 and S100A9. Patients with AE-IPF with higher levels of S100A8 or S100A9 showed significantly worse 3-month survival than those with lower levels (log-rank test, both p = 0.028). Finally, in multivariate analysis, the serum levels of both S100A8 and S100A9 were significant prognostic factors (hazard ratio 4.032, p = 0.023 and hazard ratio 4.327, p = 0.012).ConclusionThe serum levels of S100A8 and S100A9 at AE were significant prognostic biomarkers in patients with AE-IPF.