HP1 regulates the localization of FANCJ at sites of DNA double‐strand breaks

The breast and ovarian cancer predisposition protein BRCA1 forms three mutually exclusive complexes with Fanconi anemia group J protein (FANCJ, also called BACH1 or BRIP1), CtIP, and Abraxas/RAP80 through its BRCA1 C terminus (BRCT) domains, while its RING domain binds to BRCA1‐associated RING domain 1 (BARD1). We recently found that the interaction between heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) and BARD1 is required for the accumulation of BRCA1 and CtIP at sites of DNA double‐strand breaks. Here, we investigated the importance of HP1 and BARD1–HP1 interaction in the localization of FANCJ together with the other BRCA1–BRCT binding proteins to clarify the separate role of the HP1‐mediated pathway from the RNF8/RNF168‐induced ubiquitin‐mediated pathway for BRCA1 function. FANCJ interacts with HP1γ in a BARD1‐dependent manner, and this interaction was enhanced by ionizing radiation or irinotecan hydrochloride treatment. Simultaneous depletion of all three HP1 isoforms with shRNAs disrupts the accumulation of FANCJ and CtIP, but not RAP80, at double‐strand break sites. Replacement of endogenous BARD1 with a mutant BARD1 that is incapable of binding to HP1 also disrupts the accumulation of FANCJ and CtIP, but not RAP80. In contrast, RNF168 depletion disrupts the accumulation of only RAP80, but not FANCJ or CtIP. Consequently, the accumulation of conjugated ubiquitin was only inhibited by RNF168 depletion, whereas the accumulation of RAD51 and sister chromatid exchange were only inhibited by HP1 depletion or disruption of the BARD1–HP1 interaction. Taken together, the results suggest that the BRCA1–FANCJ and BRCA1–CtIP complexes are not downstream of the RNF8/RNF168/ubiquitin pathway, but are instead regulated by the HP1 pathway that precedes homologous recombination DNA repair.     

Dysregulation of the centrosome induced by BRCA1 deficiency contributes to tissue-specific carcinogenesis

Alterations in breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), a tumor suppressor gene, increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 forms a heterodimer with BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) and functions in multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair and centrosome regulation. BRCA1 acts as a tumor suppressor by promoting homologous recombination (HR) repair, and alterations in BRCA1 cause HR deficiency, not only in breast and ovarian tissues but also in other tissues. The molecular mechanisms underlying BRCA1 alteration-induced carcinogenesis remain unclear. Centrosomes are the major microtubule-organizing centers and function in bipolar spindle formation. The regulation of centrosome number is critical for chromosome segregation in mitosis, which maintains genomic stability. BRCA1/BARD1 function in centrosome regulation together with Obg-like ATPase (OLA1) and receptor for activating protein C kinase 1 (RACK1). Cancer-derived variants of BRCA1, BARD1, OLA1, and RACK1 do not interact, and aberrant expression of these proteins results in abnormal centrosome duplication in mammary-derived cells, and rarely in other cell types. RACK1 is involved in centriole duplication in the S phase by promoting polo-like kinase 1 activation by Aurora A, which is critical for centrosome duplication. Centriole number is higher in cells derived from mammary tissues compared with in those derived from other tissues, suggesting that tissue-specific centrosome characterization may shed light on the tissue specificity of BRCA1-associated carcinogenesis. Here, we explored the role of the BRCA1-containing complex in centrosome regulation and the effect of its deficiency on tissue-specific carcinogenesis.     

Reduced ligation during DNA base excision repair supported by BRCA2 mutant cells

The breast cancer predisposing genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 appear to be involved in DNA repair. In particular, the sensitivity of BRCA2-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts to ionizing radiation and the demonstrated interaction of the BRCA2 protein with Rad51, a major factor in recombinational repair, indicate that BRCA2 is important for double strand break repair. The human BRCA2-deficient human cell line Capan-1, whilst being sensitive to ionizing radiation, is also sensitive to the alkylating agent methymethanesulfonate. The major lesions induced by this agent are methylated bases which are removed primarily by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. We have investigated the efficiency of BER in Capan-1 cells by an in vitro assay in which plasmid substrates containing a single lesion are repaired by mammalian cell extracts. In comparison to the control cell lines BxPC-3, T24 and MCF7, Capan-1 cells exhibited a reduced rate of DNA ligation during both the single-nucleotide insertion and PCNA-dependent pathways of BER. The reduced rate of DNA ligation exhibited by Capan-1 cell extracts was complemented by addition of bacteriophage T4 DNA ligase or human DNA ligase III. BRCA2-mutant Capan-1 cells may possess reduced DNA ligase activity during BER.     

Loss of the N-terminal methyltransferase NRMT1 increases sensitivity to DNA damage and promotes mammary oncogenesis

Though discovered over four decades ago, the function of N-terminal methylation has mostly remained a mystery. Our discovery of the first mammalian N-terminal methyltransferase, NRMT1, has led to the discovery of many new functions for N-terminal methylation, including regulation of DNA/protein interactions, accurate mitotic division, and nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we test whether NRMT1 is also important for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, and given its previously known roles in cell cycle regulation and the DNA damage response, assay if NRMT1 is acting as a tumor suppressor. We find that NRMT1 knockdown significantly enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cell lines to both etoposide treatment and γ-irradiation, as well as, increases proliferation rate, invasive potential, anchorage-independent growth, xenograft tumor size, and tamoxifen sensitivity. Interestingly, this positions NRMT1 as a tumor suppressor protein involved in multiple DNA repair pathways, and indicates, similar to BRCA1 and BRCA2, its loss may result in tumors with enhanced sensitivity to diverse DNA damaging chemotherapeutics.     

Homology-directed dna repair, mitomycin-c resistance, and chromosome stability is restored with correction of a Brca1 mutation.

Chromosomal breaks occur spontaneously as a result of normal DNA metabolism and after exposure to DNA-damaging agents. A major pathway involved in chromosomal double-strand break repair is homologous recombination. In this pathway, a DNA sequence with similarity to a damaged chromosome directs the repair of the damage. The protein products of the hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, interact with the Rad51 protein, a central component of homologous repair pathways. We have recently shown that this interaction is significant by demonstrating that Brca1- and BRCA2-deficient cells are defective in homology-directed chromosomal break repair. We confirm that Brca1-deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells are defective in gene targeting and homology-directed repair of an I-Sce I-induced chromosome break. The phenotypic paradigm that defines homology-directed repair mutants is extended to these Brca1-deficient cells by the demonstration of 100-fold sensitivity to the interstrand cross-linking agent mitomycin-C and spontaneous chromosome instability. Interestingly, although chromosome aberrations were evident, aneuploidy was not observed. Repair phenotypes are partially restored by expression of a Brca1 transgene, whereas correction of one mutated Brca1 allele through gene targeting fully restores mitomycin-C resistance and chromosome stability. We conclude that the inability to properly repair strand breaks by homology-directed repair gives rise to defects in chromosome maintenance that promote genetic instability and, it is likely, tumorigenesis.     

The BRCA1/2 pathway prevents hematologic cancers in addition to breast and ovarian cancers

Background  

The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that inactivation of virtually any component within the pathway containing the BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins would increase the risks for lymphomas and leukemias. In people who do not have BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations, the encoded proteins prevent breast/ovarian cancer. However BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins have multiple functions including participating in a pathway that mediates repair of DNA double strand breaks by error-free methods. Inactivation of BRCA1, BRCA2 or any other critical protein within this "BRCA pathway" due to a gene mutation should inactivate this error-free repair process. DNA fragments produced by double strand breaks are then left to non-specific processes that rejoin them without regard for preserving normal gene regulation or function, so rearrangements of DNA segments are more likely. These kinds of rearrangements are typically associated with some lymphomas and leukemias.     

DNA double strand break repair and chromosomal translocation: lessons from animal models

The maintenance of genomic stability is one of the most important defenses against neoplastic transformation. This objective must be accomplished despite a constant barrage of spontaneous DNA double strand breaks. These dangerous lesions are corrected by two primary pathways of double strand break repair; non homologous end joining and homologous recombination. Recent studies employing mouse models have shown that absence of either pathway leads to genomic instability, including potentially oncogenic translocations. Because translocations involve the union of different chromosomes, cellular machinery must exist that creates these structures in the context of unrepaired double strand breaks. Evidence is mounting that the pathways of double strand break repair that are so important for survival may themselves be the culprits that generate potentially fatal translocations. Evidence and models for the dual roles of double strand break repair in both preventing, and generating, oncogenic karyotypic changes are discussed.     

Suppression of homologous recombination sensitizes human tumor cells to IGF‐1R inhibition

Inhibition of type 1 IGF receptor (IGF‐1R) sensitizes to DNA‐damaging cancer treatments, and delays repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) by non‐homologous end‐joining and homologous recombination (HR). In a recent screen for mediators of resistance to IGF‐1R inhibitor AZ12253801, we identified RAD51, required for the strand invasion step of HR. These findings prompted us to test the hypothesis that IGF‐1R‐inhibited cells accumulate DSBs formed at endogenous DNA lesions, and depend on residual HR for their repair. Indeed, initial experiments showed time‐dependent accumulation of γH2AX foci in IGF‐1R ‐inhibited or ‐depleted prostate cancer cells. We then tested effects of suppressing HR, and found that RAD51 depletion enhanced AZ12253801 sensitivity in PTEN wild‐type prostate cancer cells but not in cells lacking functional PTEN. Similar sensitization was induced in prostate cancer cells by depletion of BRCA2, required for RAD51 loading onto DNA, and in BRCA2^?/? colorectal cancer cells, compared with isogenic BRCA2^+/? cells. We also assessed chemical HR inhibitors, finding that RAD51 inhibitor BO2 blocked RAD51 focus formation and sensitized to AZ12253801. Finally, we tested CDK1 inhibitor RO‐3306, which impairs HR by inhibiting CDK1‐mediated BRCA1 phosphorylation. R0‐3306 suppressed RAD51 focus formation consistent with HR attenuation, and sensitized prostate cancer cells to IGF‐1R inhibition, with 2.4‐fold reduction in AZ12253801 GI₅₀ and 13‐fold reduction in GI₈₀. These data suggest that responses to IGF‐1R inhibition are enhanced by genetic and chemical approaches to suppress HR, defining a population of cancers (PTEN wild‐type, BRCA mutant) that may be intrinsically sensitive to IGF‐1R inhibitory drugs.     

Lower level of BRCA2 protein in heterozygous mutation carriers is correlated with an increase in DNA double strand breaks and an impaired DSB repair

The BRCA2 protein is involved in the maintenance of genomic stability through its key role in homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 leads to a defect in DNA repair and is associated with a chromosomal instability phenotype. Recent studies on familial breast cancer clusters revealed chromosomal rearrangements and higher rates of sister chromatid exchanges also in heterozygous BRCA2 mutation carriers. In the present study, lymphoblastoid cell lines of heterozygous BRCA2 mutation carriers and of wildtype relatives were compared with regard to BRCA2 mRNA and protein expression and capacity to repair DNA damage induced by gamma-irradiation and mitomycin C. BRCA2+/- cells showed lower amounts of the full-length BRCA2 protein compared to BRCA2+/+ cells. The kinetics of gamma-H2AX protein level revealed distinct defects in DNA double strand break repair in the BRCA2+/- cells. These results are indicative of a haploinsufficiency phenotype in BRCA2+/- cells, suggesting that reduced amounts of functional BRCA2 protein in BRCA2+/- carriers are insufficient for an efficient repair of DNA double strand breaks, a condition that could contribute to the impairment of genomic stability.     

A CRM1-mediated nuclear export signal governs cytoplasmic localization of BRCA2 and is essential for centrosomal localization of BRCA2

Germ-line mutations of the BRCA2 gene cause inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA2 contains two nuclear localization signals, predominantly localizes in the nucleus and plays significant roles in DNA double-strand break repair. Recently, we reported that BRCA2 localizes to the centrosomes during the S and early M phases of the cell cycle. In this study, for the first time, we identified a functional nuclear export sequence (NES1; (1383)DLSDLTFLEVA(1393)) in BRCA2. The green fluorescent protein (GFP)-NES1 fusion protein was localized in the cytoplasm and could be blocked by the chromosomal region maintenance 1-specific export inhibitor leptomycin B. Mutation of a leucine residue in the NES1 motif to alanine (L1384A) resulted in both cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of the GFP-NES1 fusion protein and a nuclear accumulation of ectopic full-length BRCA2-FLAG. Moreover, treatment of cells with leptomycin B decreased centrosomal localization of BRCA2. Finally, by microinjection of an anti-BRCA2 antibody into the cytoplasm of HeLa S3 cells, we found that depletion of normal BRCA2 proteins in the cytoplasm leads to centrosome amplification and binucleated cells. Our results suggest that disruption of the NES function by genetic changes results in deregulation of BRCA2 export, which ultimately leads to centrosome disorder.     

Crosstalk of DNA double‐strand break repair pathways in poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2‐mutated cancer

Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2) significantly increase cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Both genes function in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway of the DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair process. Therefore, the DNA‐repair defect characteristic of cancer cells brings about a therapeutic advantage for poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor‐induced synthetic lethality. PARP inhibitor‐based therapeutics initially cause cancer lethality but acquired resistance mechanisms have been found and need to be elucidated. In particular, it is essential to understand in detail the mechanism of DNA damage and repair to PARP inhibitor treatment. Further investigations have shown the roles of BRCA1/2 and its associations to other molecules in the DSB repair system. Notably, the repair pathway chosen in BRCA1‐deficient cells could be entirely different from that in BRCA2‐deficient cells after PARP inhibitor treatment. The present review describes synthetic lethality and acquired resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibitor through the DSB repair pathway and subsequent repair process. In addition, recent knowledge of resistance mechanisms is discussed. Our model should contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.     

Distinct functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in double-strand break repair

Individuals carrying BRCA mutations are predisposed to breast cancer. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are required for homologous recombination and DNA break repair, leading to the suggestion that they act in concert. However, direct evidence of a stable BRCA1/BRCA2 complex has not been demonstrated. Rather, the two proteins have been found as constituents of discrete, but perhaps nonexclusive complexes that are critical for repair. We discuss the interaction of BRCA1 with the BACH1 and BARD1 proteins, and suggest that the pleiotropic nature of mutations in BRCA1 may be associated with defects in protein--protein interactions. In contrast, the role of BRCA2 in DNA repair may be more defined by its direct interaction with the RAD51 recombinase.     

Molecular functions of BRCA1 in the DNA damage response

Ten years ago, a concerted effort from several labs resulted in the cloning of BRCA1, the first of two major hereditary breast/ovarian cancer predisposition genes. Since that time, BRCA1 has been linked to several key nuclear functions connected with the prevention of genomic instability. In particular, BRCA1 functions in concert with Rad51, BRCA2 and other genes to control double strand break repair (DSBR) and homologous recombination. Here, we reassess the role of BRCA1 and its associated proteins in this process.     

Modulation of BRCA1 mediated DNA damage repair by deregulated ER-α signaling in breast cancers

Abstract: BRCA1 mutation carriers have a greater risk of developing cancers in hormone-responsive tissues like breasts and ovaries. However, this tissue-specific incidence of BRCA1 related cancers remains elusive. The majority of the BRCA1 mutated breast cancers exhibit typical histopathological features of high-grade tumors, with basal epithelial phenotype, classified as triple-negative molecular subtype and have a higher percentage of DNA damage and chromosomal abnormality. Though there are many studies relating BRCA1 with ER-α (Estrogen receptor-α), it has not been reported whether E2 (Estrogen) -ER-α signaling can modulate the DNA repair activities of BRCA1. The present study analyzes whether deregulation of ER-α signaling, arising as a result of E2/ER-α deficiency, could impact the BRCA1 dependent DDR (DNA Damage Response) pathways, predominantly those of DNA-DSB (Double Strand break) repair and oxidative damage response. We demonstrate that E2/E2-stimulated ER-α can augment BRCA1 mediated high fidelity repairs like HRR (Homologous Recombination Repair) and BER (Base Excision Repair) in breast cancer cells. Conversely, a condition of ER-α deficiency itself or any interruption in ligand-dependent ER-α transactivation resulted in delayed DNA damage repair, leading to persistent activation of γH2AX and retention of unrepaired DNA lesions, thereby triggering tumor progression. ER-α deficiency not only limited the HRR in cells but also facilitated the DSB repair through error prone pathways like NHEJ (Non Homologous End Joining). ER-α deficiency associated persistence of DNA lesions and reduced expression of DDR proteins were validated in human mammary tumors.     

BRCA2 interacts with the cytoskeletal linker protein plectin to form a complex controlling centrosome localization

The breast cancer susceptibility gene ( BRCA2 ) is localized mainly in the nucleus where it plays an important role in DNA damage repair. Some BRCA2 protein is also present in the centrosome. Here, we demonstrate that BRCA2 interacts with plectin, a cytoskeletal cross-linker protein, and that this interaction controls the position of the centrosome. Phosphorylation of plectin by cyclin-dependent kinase 1/cyclin B (CDK1/CycB) kinase has been reported to abolish its cross-linking function during mitosis. Here, we induced phosphorylation of plectin in prepared fractions of HeLa cells by adding activated CDK1/CycB kinase. Consequently, there was significant dissociation of the centrosome from the nuclear membrane. Plectin has six homologous ankyrin-like repeat domains (termed PLEC M1-M6). Using a pull-down assay, we found that GST–PLEC M1 and a GST-C-terminal region fusion protein (which comprised PLEC M6, along with an adjacent vimentin site) interacted with BRCA2. Since each PLEC module exhibits high homology to the others, the possibility of all six domains participating in this interaction was indicated. Moreover, when PLEC M1 was overexpressed in HeLa cells, it competed with endogenous plectin and inhibited the BRCA2–plectin interaction. This inhibitory effect resulted in dissociation of the centrosomes from the nucleus and increased the rate of micronuclei formation which may lead to carcinogenesis. In addition, when either BRCA2 or plectin was suppressed by the appropriate siRNA, a similar change in centrosomal positioning was observed. We suggest that the BRCA2–plectin interaction plays an important role in the regulation of centrosome localization and also that displacement of the centrosome may result in genomic instability and cancer development. ( Cancer Sci 2009; 00: 000–000)     

BRCA1和基因组稳定性

BRCA1基因编码一个220kDa的多功能区核蛋白,有与癌基因蛋白（c-myc,E2F等）,抑癌基因蛋白（p53,RB,BRCA2),DNA修复相关蛋白（RAD50,RAD51）,细胞周期调节蛋白（cyclins and CDKs)以及转录调节因polymeraseⅡ）等多种重要蛋白相互作用,不仅能抑制细胞生长,还参与细胞周期调控,基因转录调节,DNA损伤修复以及凋亡等多种细胞活动,在维持基因组稳定性中起重要的作用。本文对BRCA1的生化结构及其在维持基因组稳定性中的作用做一综述。     

Class I histone deacetylase inhibitors inhibit the retention of BRCA1 and 53BP1 at the site of DNA damage

BRCA1 and 53BP1 antagonistically regulate homology‐directed repair (HDR) and non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) of DNA double‐strand breaks (DSB). The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A directly inhibits the retention of 53BP1 at DSB sites by acetylating histone H4 (H4ac), which interferes with 53BP1 binding to dimethylated histone H4 Lys20 (H4K20me2). Conversely, we recently found that the retention of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex is also affected by another methylated histone residue, H3K9me2, which can be suppressed by the histone lysine methyltransferase (HKMT) inhibitor UNC0638. Here, we investigate the effects of the class I HDAC inhibitors MS‐275 and FK228 compared to UNC0638 on histone modifications and the DNA damage response. In addition to H4ac, the HDAC inhibitors induce H3K9ac and inhibit H3K9me2 at doses that do not affect the expression levels of DNA repair genes. By contrast, UNC0638 selectively inhibits H3K9me2 without affecting the levels of H3K9ac, H3K56ac or H4ac. Reflecting their effects on histone modifications, the HDAC inhibitors inhibit ionizing radiation‐induced foci (IRIF) formation of BRCA1 and BARD1 as well as 53BP1 and RIF1, whereas UNC0638 suppresses IRIF formation of BRCA1 and BARD1 but not 53BP1 and RIF1. Although HDAC inhibitors suppressed HDR, they did not cooperate with the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib to block cancer cell growth, possibly due to simultaneous suppression of NHEJ pathway components. Collectively, these results suggest the mechanism by that HDAC inhibitors inhibit both the HDR and NHEJ pathways, whereas HKMT inhibitor inhibits only the HDR pathway; this finding may affect the chemosensitizing effects of the inhibitors.