Antibiotic Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background

The antibiotic rifaximin is used to treat non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methane production is associated with constipation and its severity in constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). A previous retrospective study suggested that rifaximin and neomycin was superior to neomycin alone in improving symptoms in methane-positive subjects.

Aims

To determine the effectiveness of neomycin alone or with rifaximin in improving symptoms in methane-positive C-IBS subjects.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed from 2010 to 2013 at three tertiary care centers. Subjects aged 18–65 with C-IBS (Rome II criteria) and breath methane (>3 ppm) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Subjects completed a baseline symptom questionnaire rating the severity of abdominal and bowel symptoms on a visual analog scale and were randomized to receive neomycin and placebo or neomycin and rifaximin for 14 days. Symptom severity was assessed by weekly questionnaire for 2 weeks of therapy and 4 additional weeks of follow-up.

Results

Thirty-one subjects (16 neomycin and placebo, 15 neomycin and rifaximin) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Constipation severity was significantly lower in the neomycin and rifaximin group (28.6 ± 30.8) compared to neomycin alone (61.2 ± 24.1) (P = 0.0042), with greater improvement in constipation (P = 0.007), straining (P = 0.017) and bloating (P = 0.020), but not abdominal pain. In the neomycin and rifaximin group, subjects with methane <3 ppm after treatment reported significantly lower constipation severity (30.5 ± 21.8) than subjects with persistent methane (67.2 ± 32.1) (P = 0.020).

Conclusions

Rifaximin plus neomycin is superior to neomycin alone in improving multiple C-IBS symptoms. This effect is predicted by a reduction in breath methane.     

Neomycin Improves Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome in a Fashion That Is Dependent on the Presence of Methane Gas: Subanalysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study

Recent studies have shown that normalization of the lactulose breath test (LBT) with neomycin leads to a significant reduction in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. This subanalysis was done on the constipation-predominant IBS subgroup of patients (C-IBS) to test the ability of neomycin to improve constipation and its correlation with the elimination of methane on breath test. IBS subjects underwent LBT in a blinded fashion. They were then randomly allocated to neomycin or placebo groups. For the purpose of this analysis, only the C-IBS subjects were identified. They were then evaluated for global improvement, abdominal pain, and constipation severity. The ability of neomycin to eliminate methane and its associated improvement in constipation was also determined. One hundred eleven subjects meeting Rome I criteria for IBS were included in the study. Thirty-nine of these had C-IBS. Of these, 20 received placebo and 19 received neomycin. With neomycin, a global improvement of 36.7±7.9% was seen, compared to 5.0±3.2% for placebo (P < .001) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Constipation was improved by 32.6±9.9% with neomycin compared to 18.7±7.2% for placebo (P=.26). Of the original 111 subjects, 12 demonstrated methane on breath test. All 12 of these patients were constipation predominant. In the methane producers receiving neomycin or placebo, improvement in constipation was significantly greater in those receiving neomycin (44.0±12.3%) compared to placebo (5.0±5.1%) (P < .05). Treatment with neomycin improves constipation in C-IBS. This improvement depends on the presence and elimination of methane on breath test.     

Antibiotics for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

The treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is complex and therapeutic regimens vary according to the acuity of presentation and the goals of therapy. Most treatments for HE rely on manipulating the intestinal milieu and therefore antibiotics that act on the gut form a key treatment strategy. Prominent antibiotics studied in HE are neomycin, metronidazole, vancomycin and rifaximin. For the management of the acute episode, all antibiotics have been tested. However the limited numbers studied, adverse effects (neomycin oto- and nephrotoxicity, metronidazole neurotoxicity) and potential for resistance emergence (vancomycin-resistant enterococcus) has limited the use of most antibiotics, apart from rifaximin which has the greatest evidence base. Rifaximin has also demonstrated, in conjunction with lactulose, to prevent overt HE recurrence in a multi-center, randomized trial. Despite its cost in the US, rifaximin may prove cost-saving by preventing hospitalizations for overt HE. In minimal/covert HE, rifaximin is the only systematically studied antibiotic. Rifaximin showed improvement in cognition, inflammation, quality-of-life and driving simulator performance but cost-analysis does not favor its use at the current time. Antibiotics, especially rifaximin, have a definite role in the management across the spectrum of HE.     

Study confirms benefit of surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Evaluation of: Pimentel M, Lembo A, Chey WD et al. Rifaximin therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome without constipation. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(1), 22–32 (2011).

Alterations in gut flora may play an important role in the pathophysiology of bowel symptoms, especially in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). If so, antibiotics that affect gut flora may offer a novel approach for the management of patients with IBS. Here, we discuss the results of two identically designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (TARGET 1 and TARGET 2) of a poorly absorbed antibiotic, rifaximin, in patients with IBS. In these studies, 1260 patients (females 76.1 and 72.1%, respectively) who had IBS without constipation were randomized to receive either rifaximin 550 mg or placebo, three-times daily for 2 weeks. Subsequently, daily symptoms were assessed and patients were followed up for 10 weeks. The primary outcome measure – adequate relief of global IBS symptoms during the first 4 weeks after treatment – was met in significantly more patients who received rifaximin than placebo (p < 0.001). In addition, more patients in the rifaximin group than in the placebo group (p < 0.001) reported an adequate relief of bloating, and an improvement in abdominal pain and stool consistency – secondary outcome measures. The incidence of adverse events with rifaximin was similar to placebo, and the drug was well tolerated. In summary, a 2-week course of rifaximin provided significant relief of IBS symptoms, as well as bloating and abdominal pain.     

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of rifaximin in patients with abdominal bloating and flatulence

AIMS: To study the efficacy of rifaximin, a nonabsorbable antibiotic, in relieving chronic functional symptoms of bloating and flatulence. METHODS: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial consisting of three 10-day phases: baseline (phase 1), treatment with rifaximin 400 mg b.i.d. or placebo (phase 2), and post-treatment period (phase 3). Primary efficacy variable was subjective global symptom relief at the end of each phase. A symptom score was calculated from a symptom diary. Lactulose H2-breath test (LHBT) was performed at baseline and end of study. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients were enrolled (63 rifaximin and 61 placebo). Baseline characteristics were comparable and none had an abnormal baseline LHBT. Rome II criteria were met in 58.7% and 54.1%, respectively. At the end of phase 2, there was a significant difference in global symptom relief with rifaximin versus placebo (41.3% vs 22.9%, p = 0.03). This improvement was maintained at the end of phase 3 (28.6% vs 11.5%, p = 0.02). Mean cumulative and bloating-specific scores dropped significantly in the rifaximin group (p < 0.05). Among patients with IBS, a favorable response to rifaximin was noted (40.5% vs 18.2%; p = 0.04) persisting by the end of phase 3 (27% vs 9.1%; p = 0.05). H2-breath excretion dropped significantly among rifaximin responders and correlated with improvement in bloating and overall symptom scores (p = 0.01). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Rifaximin is a safe and effective treatment for abdominal bloating and flatulence, including in IBS patients. Symptom improvement correlates with reduction in H2-breath excretion. Future trials are needed to examine the efficacy of long-term or cyclic rifaximin in functional colonic disorders.     

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis and Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Purpose Interstitial cystitis (IC) often coexists with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS may be explained by small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), which increases immune activation and visceral hypersensitivity. This prospective pilot study tested hypotheses that IC patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms have SIBO, that nonabsorbable antibiotic use improves symptoms, and that improvement is sustained by prokinetic therapy. Methods Consecutive IC patients with GI symptoms had lactulose breath testing (LBT). Those with abnormal results received rifaximin 1,200–1,800 mg/day for 10 days then tegaserod 3 mg/nightly. Questionnaires addressed IC and GI global improvement. Results Of 21 patients, 17 (81%) had abnormal LBTs. Of 15 patients treated, GI global improvement was moderate to great in 11 (73%) and sustained in ten (67%). IC global improvement was moderate to great in six (40%) and sustained in seven (47%). Conclusions A majority of IC patients and GI symptoms had an abnormal LBT suggesting SIBO. Rifaximin improved symptoms, which was sustained by tegaserod.     

Rifaximin,gut microbes and mucosal inflammation: unraveling a complex relationship

Rifaximin is a non-systemic, broad-spectrum antibiotic that acts against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria. Clinical studies indicate that rifaximin is beneficial in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The mechanism responsible for the beneficial effects of rifaximin is not clear. In a recent study, we reported that rifaximin alters the bacterial population in the ileum of rats, leading to a relative abundance of Lactobacillus species. These changes prevent gut inflammation and visceral hyperalgesia caused by chronic stress. To more closely mirror human clinical studies in which rifaximin is used to treat IBS symptoms, we performed additional studies and showed that rifaximin reversed mucosal inflammation and barrier dysfunction evoked by chronic stress. These beneficial effects were accompanied by a striking increase in the abundance of Lactobacillaceae and a marked reduction in the number of segmented filamentous bacteria after rifaximin treatment. These microbial changes may contribute to the antiinflammatory effects of rifaximin on the intestinal mucosa.     

Is irritable bowel syndrome an infectious disease?

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common of all gastroenterological diseases. While many mechanisms have been postulated to explain its etiology, no single mechanism entirely explains the heterogeneity of symptoms seen with the various phenotypes of the disease. Recent data from both basic and clinical sciences suggest that underlying infectious disease may provide a unifying hypothesis that better explains the overall symptomatology. The presence of small intestinal bowel overgrowth (SIBO) has been documented in patients with IBS and reductions in SIBO as determined by breath testing correlate with IBS symptom improvement in clinical trials. The incidence of new onset IBS symptoms following acute infectious gastroenteritis also suggests an infectious cause. Alterations in microbiota-host interactions may compromise epithelial barrier integrity, immune function, and the development and function of both central and enteric nervous systems explaining alterations in the brain-gut axis. Clinical evidence from treatment trials with both probiotics and antibiotics also support this etiology. Probiotics appear to restore the imbalance in the microflora and improve IBS-specific quality of life. Antibiotic trials with both neomycin and rifaximin show improvement in global IBS symptoms that correlates with breath test normalization in diarrhea-predominant patients. The treatment response to two weeks of rifaximin is sustained for up to ten weeks and comparable results are seen in symptom reduction with retreatment in patients who develop recurrent symptoms.     

Small intestine bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel syndrome-related symptoms： Experience with Rifaximin

AIM： TO estimate the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth （SIBO） in our geographical area （Western Sicily, Italy） by means of an observational study, and to gather information on the use of locally active, non-absorbable antibiotics for treatment of SIBO.
METHODS： Our survey included 115 patients fulfilling the Rome II criteria for diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome （IBS）; a total of 97 patients accepted to perform a breath test with lactulose （BTLact）, and those who had a positive test, received Rifaximin （Normix , Alfa Wassermann） 1200 mg/d for 7 d; 3 wk after the end of treatment, the BTLact was repeated.
RESULTS： Based on the BTLact results, SIBO was present in about 56% of IBS patients, and it was responsible for some IBS-related symptoms, such as abdominal bloating and discomfort, and diarrhoea. 1-wk treatment with Rifaximin turned the BTLact to negative in about 50% of patients and significantly reduced the symptoms, especially in those patients with an alternated constipation/diarrhoea-variant IBS.
CONCLUSION： SIBO should be always suspected in patients with IBS, and a differential diagnosis is done by means of a ＂breath test＂. Rifaximin may represent a valid approach to the treatment of SIBO.     

Normalization of lactulose breath testing correlates with symptom improvement in irritable bowel syndrome. a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: We have recently found an association between abnormal lactulose breath test (LBT) findings and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The current study was designed to test the effect of antibiotic treatment for IBS in a double-blind fashion. METHODS: Consecutive IBS subjects underwent an LBT with the results blinded. All subjects were subsequently randomized into two treatment groups (neomycin or placebo). The prevalence of abnormal LBT was compared with a gender-matched control group. Seven days after completion of treatment, subjects returned for repeat LBT. A symptom questionnaire was administered on both days. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were met, 111 IBS subjects (55 neomycin, 56 placebo) entered the study, with 84% having an abnormal LBT, compared with 20% in healthy controls (p < 0.01). In an intention-to-treat analysis of all 111 subjects, neomycin resulted in a 35.0% improvement in a composite score, compared with 11.4% for placebo (p < 0.05). Additionally, patients reported a percent bowel normalization of 35.3% after neomycin, compared with 13.9% for placebo (p < 0.001). There was a graded response to treatment, such that the best outcome was observed if neomycin was successful in normalizing the LBT (75% improvement) (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). LBT gas production was associated with IBS subgroup, such that methane excretion was 100% associated with constipation-predominant IBS. Methane excretors had a mean constipation severity of 4.1, compared with 2.3 in all other subjects (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal LBT is common in subjects with IBS. Normalization of LBT with neomycin leads to a significant reduction in IBS symptoms. The type of gas seen on LBT is also associated with IBS subgroup.     

Breath test for differential diagnosis between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel disease： An observation on non-absorbable antibiotics

AIM： To estimate the prevalence of small intestine bacterial overgrowth （SIBO） among patients with an earlier diagnosis of irritable bowel disease （IBS） in our geographical area, and to collect information on the use of locally acting non-absorbable antibiotics in the management of SIBO. METHODS： A non-interventional study was conducted in 73 consecutive patients with a symptom-based diagnosis.. RESULTS： When the patients underwent a ＂breath test＂, 33 （45.2%） showed the presence of a SIBO. Arcer treatment with rifaximin 1200 mg/d for seven days in 32 patients, 19 （59.4%） showed a negative ＂breath test＂ one week later as well as a significant reduction of symptoms, thus confirming the relationship between SIBO and many of the symptoms claimed by patients. In the other 13 patients, ＂breath test＂ remained positive, and a further cycle of treatment with ciprofloxacin 500 mg/d was given for 7 additional days, resulting in a negative ＂breath test＂ in one patient only. CONCLUSION： （1） about half of the patients with a symptomatic diagnosis of IBS have actually SIBO, which is responsible for most of the symptoms attributed to IBS; （2） only a ＂breath test＂ with lactulose （or with glucose in subjects with an intolerance to lactose） can provide a differential diagnosis between IBS and SIBO, with almost identical symptoms; and （3） the use of non-absorbable antibiotics may be useful to reduce the degree of SIBO and related symptoms; it must be accompanied, however, by the correction of the wrong alimentary habits underlying SIBO.     

Restless Legs Syndrome in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Response to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Therapy

Background Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and fibromyalgia. Since restless legs syndrome (RLS) occurs with fibromyalgia, a link between IBS, SIBO, and RLS was studied. Methods BS patients with abnormal lactulose breath tests received rifaximin 1,200 mg day⁻¹ for 10 days, followed by tegaserod 3 mg, long-term, and 1 month of zinc 220 mg day⁻¹ and once-daily probiotic (N = 11) or rifaximin monotherapy (N = 2). IBS symptom improvement was assessed after rifaximin. RLS symptoms, IBS symptoms, and overall IBS global improvement were assessed at last posttreatment visit: 8/10 patients were followed long-term (mean, 139 days; range, 54–450 days). Results Ten of 13 patients exhibited ≥80% improvement from baseline in RLS symptoms. Five maintained complete resolution of RLS symptoms. Global gastrointestinal symptom improvement was great (n = 6), moderate (n = 5), or mild (n = 2). Conclusion This study suggests that SIBO associated with IBS may be a factor in some RLS patients and SIBO therapy provides long-term RLS improvement.     

Rifaximin in patients with lactose intolerance

BACKGROUND: Abdominal symptoms linked to lactose malabsorption may be caused by metabolic activity of colonic bacteria. Rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifampycin derivative, is active against colonic bacteria, it may be useful in the treatment of lactose intolerance. AIM: The aim of this study has been to evaluate short-term rifaximin therapy in patients with lactose intolerance. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with lactose intolerance diagnosed using the hydrogen lactose breath test were studied. Fourteen patients received rifaximin 800 mg/day for 10 days, 13 patients followed a diet without milk for 40 days and 5 patients received a placebo for 10 days. Total breath H(2) excretion expressed as area under the curve, and the symptom score were evaluated in all patients at the start, and subsequently after 10 and 40 days. RESULTS: In the 14 patients who received rifaximin for 10 days, area under the curve at day 10 and day 40 was statistically significantly lower than the one computed at basal (P<0.01). Diet reduced area under the curve progressively reaching statistical significance at day 40, while the placebo did not change area under the curve throughout the study. The total symptom score significantly improved after rifaximin and diet. CONCLUSION: In patients with lactose intolerance, a 10-day therapy with rifaximin as well as 40-day diet without lactose reduces the area under the curve and the symptom score.     

Effect of poorly absorbable antibiotics on hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe effects of poorly/non-absorbable antibiotics on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) are debated.AimTo analyze the effects of rifaximin or norfloxacin on HVPG and on markers of bacterial translocation and proinflammatory cytokines.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, assessing the effect of rifaximin or norfloxacin vs control on HVPG. Pooled analyses were based on random-effects models, heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q, I² statistic and subgroup analyses.ResultsFive studies (215 patients) were included. Risk of bias was high in three. We found no significant differences using antibiotics versus control. The summary mean difference in HVPG was of -0.55 mmHg (95%CI:-1.52, 0.42; P = 0.27), with moderate heterogeneity (P = 0.15; I² = 40%). RCTs with longer therapy (60–90 days) used non-selective-beta-blockers (NSBB) in both antibiotics and control arms. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly greater reduction in HVPG in the combination arm over controls (mean difference -1.46 mmHg [95%CI: −2.63, −0.28; P = 0.01]) with no heterogeneity (P = 0.46; I² = 0%). Serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) significantly decreased with antibiotics, but with high heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I² = 92%).ConclusionsRifaximin or norfloxacin did not significantly reduce HVPG in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Studies using antibiotic for longer periods on top of NSBB showed a significant decrease in HVPG.     

Rifaximin for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, functional bowel disorder characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort and altered bowel habit. The pathophysiology is unclear, but may include altered gut motility, visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal central pain processing, chronic low-grade intestinal inflammation, or disturbances in the gut microbiome. These etiological mechanisms, alongside environmental factors such as stress and anxiety, vary between individuals and represent potential targets for treatment. Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed oral antibiotic proposed to act on the gut microenvironment, used in the treatment of travelers’ diarrhea and hepatic encephalopathy. Clinical trials suggest the drug can reduce global IBS symptoms and improve bloating, abdominal pain, and stool consistency in some patients with non-constipated IBS, leading to Food and Drug Administration approval in the United States. This article considers the pharmacology of rifaximin, the evidence for its use in IBS, and the safety and tolerability of the drug.     

Eubiotic properties of rifaximin: Disruption of the traditional concepts in gut microbiota modulation

Antibiotics are usually prescribed to cure infections but they also have significant modulatory effects on the gut microbiota. Several alterations of the intestinal bacterial community have been reported during antibiotic treatment, including the reduction of beneficial bacteria as well as of microbial alpha-diversity. Although after the discontinuation of antibiotic therapies it has been observed a trend towards the restoration of the original condition, the new steady state is different from the previous one, as if antibiotics induced some kind of irreversible perturbation of the gut microbial community. The poorly absorbed antibiotic rifaximin seem to be different from the other antibiotics, because it exerts non-traditional effects additional to the bactericidal/bacteriostatic activity on the gut microbiota. Rifaximin is able to reduce bacterial virulence and translocation, has anti-inflammatory properties and has been demonstrated to positively modulate the gut microbial composition. Animal models, culture studies and metagenomic analyses have demonstrated an increase in Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Lactobacillus abundance after rifaximin treatment, probably consequent to the induction of bacterial resistance, with no major change in the overall gut microbiota composition. Antibiotics are therefore modulators of the symbiotic relationship between the host and the gut microbiota. Specific antibiotics, such as rifaximin, can also induce eubiotic changes in the intestinal ecosystem; this additional property may represent a therapeutic advantage in specific clinical settings.     

Methane production during lactulose breath test is associated with gastrointestinal disease presentation

It has recently been determined that there is an increased prevalence of bacterial overgrowth in IBS. Since there are two gases (hydrogen and methane) measured on lactulose breath testing, we evaluated whether the different gas patterns on lactulose breath testing coincide with diarrhea and constipation symptoms in IBS and IBD. Consecutive patients referred to the gastrointestinal motility program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for lactulose breath testing were given a questionnaire to evaluate their gastrointestinal symptoms. Symptoms were graded on a scale of 0–5. Upon completion of the breath test, the results were divided into normal, hydrogen only, hydrogen and methane, and methane only positive breath tests. A comparison of all subjects and IBS subjects was undertaken to evaluate diarrhea and constipation with regards to the presence or absence of methane. This was further contrasted to Crohn's and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in the database. After exclusion criteria, 551 subjects from the database were available for comparison. Of the 551 subjects (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA) and in a subgroup of 296 IBS subjects (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA), there was a significant association between the severity of reported constipation and the presence of methane. The opposite was true for diarrhea (P < 0.001). If a breath test was methane positive, this was 100% associated with constipation predominant IBS. Furthermore, IBS had a greater prevalence of methane production than Crohn's or UC. In fact, methane was almost nonexistent in the predominantly diarrheal conditions of Crohn's and UC. In conclusion, a methane positive breath test is associated with constipation as a symptom.     

Rifaximin, a nonabsorbed oral antibiotic, in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: antimicrobial activity, efficacy, and safety

The nonabsorbed (< 0.4%) oral antibiotic rifaximin, which has been available for enteric bacterial conditions for more than a decade in several countries outside the United States, was recently introduced in the United States for the treatment of travelers' diarrhea, and is being evaluated in clinical trials for possible introduction for hepatic encephalopathy and other conditions involving enteric bacteria. This article discusses the antimicrobial activity, efficacy, and safety of rifaximin in hepatic encephalopathy. Rifaximin is a nonsystemic antibiotic with antibacterial activity against enteric pathogens for gastrointestinal infections. In 15 studies, several of which were adequately powered to assess efficacy, rifaximin was at least as effective as lactulose/lactitol (the current mainstay of pharmacologic treatment for hepatic encephalopathy) and neomycin and paromomycin (the antibiotics most commonly prescribed for hepatic encephalopathy) in improving neurologic signs and symptoms and reducing blood ammonia levels. The results of studies employing small samples are similar to those of the larger studies. Finally, rifaximin has a good tolerability profile in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, and thus appears to constitute a promising new option for this disorder. The current database on rifaximin would be strengthened by results of placebo-controlled studies to quantify more precisely the benefits of therapy.     

A link between irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia may be related to findings on lactulose breath testing

BACKGROUND: An association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been found. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and test results for bacterial overgrowth between IBS and fibromyalgia. METHODS: Subjects with independent fibromyalgia and IBS were compared with controls in a double blind study. Participants completed a questionnaire, and a lactulose hydrogen breath test was used to determine the presence of SIBO. The prevalence of an abnormal breath test was compared between study participants. Hydrogen production on the breath test was compared between subjects with IBS and fibromyalgia. The somatic pain visual analogue score of subjects with fibromyalgia was compared with their degree of hydrogen production. RESULTS: 3/15 (20%) controls had an abnormal breath test compared with 93/111 (84%) subjects with IBS (p<0.01) and 42/42 (100%) with fibromyalgia (p<0.0001 v controls, p<0.05 v IBS). Subjects with fibromyalgia had higher hydrogen profiles (p<0.01), peak hydrogen (p<0.0001), and area under the curve (p<0.01) than subjects with IBS. This was not dependent on the higher prevalence of an abnormal breath test. The degree of somatic pain in fibromyalgia correlated significantly with the hydrogen level seen on the breath test (r = 0.42, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal lactulose breath test is more common in fibromyalgia than IBS. In contrast with IBS, the degree of abnormality on breath test is greater in subjects with fibromyalgia and correlates with somatic pain.     

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prevents the Development of a Post-Infectious Phenotype in a New Rat Model of Post-Infectious IBS

Background  

A recent post-infectious rat model with Campylobacter jejuni 81-176 has replicated the events noted in humans with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this study, we test whether prophylactic treatment with the antibiotic rifaximin will prevent the development of long-term altered bowel function in this model.