PET in the management of urologic malignancies

FDG-PET has a limited role in diagnosis of prostate cancer mainly because of the low uptake of FDG in the tumor and normal excretion of FDG through urine. FDG-PET has shown some promise in the assessment of lymph nodes and bone metastases. There is a large degree of variability when FDG-PET is compared with bone scintigraphy. New C11-labeled radiotracers (acetate, choline, and methionine) have shown promising initial results but further studies are required to determine their role in such settings. These radiotracers provide a unique opportunity for dynamic, multitracer, and quantitative studies, which improve the sensitivity and specificity on PET in this population. Short half-lives and of C-11, however with the limits to their use requires an on-site cyclotron. Recent synthesis schemes with [18F]-labeling, however, may overcome this limitation. FDG-PET has a significant potential to assist with the diagnosis and management of testicular cancer. PET has been most useful in defining the presence or absence of disease in patients with residual masses. PET has shown promising results for the initial diagnosis of this cancer, but further for studies ar required to determine its role in the management of this malignancy. PET can be used in conjunction with conventional imaging techniques to diagnose retroperitoneal masses in patients with primary testicular cancer. FDG-PET has shown very encouraging results in a limited number of studies, and has also demonstrated a good sensitivity for initial staging. FDG-PET seems to be superior to conventional imaging modalities for detecting local disease and recurrence, and distant metastases.     

Kombinierte funktionelle und morphologische Bildgebung bei Sarkomen

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) and especially hybrid FDG-PET/CT is becoming more and more accepted for the clinical management of adult and pediatric patients with sarcomas. By integrating the CT component the specificity in particular but also the sensitivity of the modality are improved further. With PET/CT a complete staging including the detection of lung metastases is feasible in a single examination. For patients with primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas FDG-PET/CT is utilized for diagnosis, staging and restaging, metabolic tumor grading, guidance of biopsies, detection of tumor recurrence and therapy monitoring. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that FDG uptake of the tumor prior to treatment and changes of FDG uptake after therapy significantly correlate with histopathologic response and survival of patients. Therefore, PET and PET/CT have a prognostic value. In the future new perspectives of hybrid PET/CT imaging will arise by introducing novel radiotracers and combined functional imaging of tumor metabolism and perfusion. High resolution MRI is essential for local evaluation of the primary tumor and preoperative planning with assessment of possible infiltration of vascular or neural structures. Contrast-enhanced MRI remains a key tool in the diagnosis of recurrent disease, especially in tumors which are not hypermetabolic. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR sequences can significantly contribute to therapy monitoring. More research is necessary to prospectively compare dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of local and recurrent diseases.     

FDG-PET on irradiated brain tumor: ten years' summary

Purpose: To evaluate FDG-PET in post-radiotherapy differentiation of tumor recurrence/malignant degeneration and radiation reaction, and to assess the role of PET in terms of survival.

Material and Methods: 117 consecutive patients with a total of 156 FDG-PET examinations with positive but non-diagnostic MRI and/or CT were included. Final diagnosis was based on histopathology or correlated with radiologic and clinical follow-up. Brain metastases from lung carcinomas were further studied separately. Survival time was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: There were 61 true-positive, 2 false-positive, 15 false-negative, and 51 true-negative PET examinations; 5 positive and 22 negative PET examinations were indeterminate. The positive predictive value of a PET examination was 96% in all and 100% in brain metastases from lung carcinoma. The negative predictive value based on the histopathologic results was 55.6%. Survival time was significantly longer in patients with negative PET.

Conclusion: FDG-PET is a valuable tool in the detection of tumor recurrence, especially lung carcinoma metastasis. FDG uptake is a prognostic marker.     

Clinical value of FDG-PET in the follow up of post-operative patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: The clinical usefulness of FDG-PET in the follow up of post-operative patients with endometrial cancer was retrospectively evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one post-operative patients with endometrial cancer received 30 FDG-PET examinations to evaluate recurrence or response to treatment. The findings of FDG-PET were compared with their serum levels of tumor markers, CT and/or MRI findings, and the final outcome. Results of FDG-PET were also correlated with the clinical course of each patient. RESULTS: In detecting recurrent lesions and evaluating treatment responses, FDG-PET, with the help in anatomic information by CT/MRI, showed better diagnostic ability (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 88.2%, accuracy 93.3%) compared with combined conventional imaging (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 85.7%, accuracy 85.0%) and tumor markers (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 70.6%, accuracy 83.3%). FDG-PET had no false-negative results, suggesting the possibility of its use as the first-line examination in a patient's follow-up. FDG-PET could detect unknown lesions in 4 cases, and, as reported for other malignancies, FDG-PET affected the patient management in one-third of the cases. Furthermore, the results of FDG-PET correlated well with the clinical outcome of the patients, with patients with negative PET results tending to show disease-free courses. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, despite the limited number of patients studied, FDG-PET was accurate in detecting recurrence and evaluating therapeutic response, and could afford important information in the management of post-operative patients with endometrial cancer. FDG-PET also appeared to have a possibility to predict the outcome of each patient.     

Assessment of response to cancer therapy using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography

In order to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the assessment of therapeutic effects, FDG-PET studies were performed both before and after therapy in 26 patients with miscellaneous malignant tumors. The change in FDG uptake by therapy was compared with the change in tumor size and prognosis. All 26 lesions had a high FDG uptake before therapy. Five of seven lesions which had a relatively low FDG uptake before therapy showed no change or increase in tumor size by therapy. The decreased FDG uptake after therapy was more prominent in the partial response group than in the no change group. FDG uptake before therapy in the non-relapse group was higher than that in the relapse group. However, a decreased FDG uptake did not necessarily indicate a good prognosis. One patient with no change in tumor size and a decreased FDG uptake had no recurrence. This suggests that FDG-PET has a complementary role in the assessment of therapeutic effects.     

The usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion image in diagnosing pancreatic tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

This study aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of retrospectively fused ¹⁸F FDG-PET and MRI (PET/MRI fusion image) in diagnosing pancreatic tumor, in particular differentiating malignant tumor from benign lesions. In addition, we evaluated additional findings characterizing pancreatic lesions by FDG-PET/MRI fusion image.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 119 patients: 96 cancers and 23 benign lesions. FDG-PET/MRI fusion images (PET/T1 WI or PET/T2WI) were made by dedicated software using 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI image and FDG-PET images. These images were interpreted by two well-trained radiologists without knowledge of clinical information and compared with FDG-PET/CT images. We compared the differential diagnostic capability between PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI fusion image. In addition, we evaluated additional findings such as tumor structure and tumor invasion.

Results

FDG-PET/MRI fusion image significantly improved accuracy compared with that of PET/CT (96.6 vs. 86.6 %). As additional finding, dilatation of main pancreatic duct was noted in 65.9 % of solid types and in 22.6 % of cystic types, on PET/MRI-T2 fusion image. Similarly, encasement of adjacent vessels was noted in 43.1 % of solid types and in 6.5 % of cystic types. Particularly in cystic types, intra-tumor structures such as mural nodule (35.4 %) or intra-cystic septum (74.2 %) were detected additionally. Besides, PET/MRI-T2 fusion image could detect extra benign cystic lesions (9.1 % in solid type and 9.7 % in cystic type) that were not noted by PET/CT.

Conclusions

In diagnosing pancreatic lesions, FDG-PET/MRI fusion image was useful in differentiating pancreatic cancer from benign lesions. Furthermore, it was helpful in evaluating relationship between lesions and surrounding tissues as well as in detecting extra benign cysts.     

PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma

The evaluation of patients with known or suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma is now an accepted indication for positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) imaging. FDG-PET does not replace imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) for preoperative anatomic evaluation but is indicated as the initial test for diagnosis and staging of recurrence and for preoperative staging (N and M) of known recurrence that is considered to be resectable. FDG-PET imaging is valuable for the differentiation of posttreatment changes from recurrent tumor, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions (indeterminate lymph nodes, hepatic and pulmonary lesions), and the evaluation of patients with rising tumor markers in the absence of a known source. The addition of FDG-PET to the evaluation of these patients reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will and will not benefit from surgical procedures. Although initial staging at the time of diagnosis is often performed during colectomy, FDG-PET imaging is recommended for a subgroup of patients at high risk (with elevated CEA levels) and normal CT and for whom surgery can be avoided if FDG-PET shows metastases. Screening for recurrence in patients at high risk has also been advocated. FDG-PET imaging seems promising for monitoring patient response to therapy but larger studies are necessary. The diagnostic implications of integrated PET-CT imaging include improved detection of lesions on both the CT and FDG-PET images, better differentiation of physiologic from pathologic foci of metabolism, and better localization of the pathologic foci. This new powerful technology provides more accurate interpretation of both CT and FDG-PET images and therefore more optimal patient care. PET-CT fusion images affect the clinical management by guiding further procedures (biopsy, surgery, radiation therapy), excluding the need for additional procedures, and changing both inter- and intramodality therapy.     

Relevance of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

BACKGROUND: The clinical use of positron emission tomography (PET) for detection and staging of malignant tumors is rapidly increasing. Furthermore, encouraging results for monitoring the effects of radio- and chemotherapy have been reported. METHODS: This review describes the technical principles of PET and the biological characteristics of tracers used in oncological research and patient studies. The results of clinical studies published in peer reviewed journals during the last 5 years are summarized and clinical indications for PET scans in various tumor types are discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Numerous studies have documented the high diagnostic accuracy of PET studies using the glucose analogue F-18-fluordeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) for detection and staging of malignant tumors. In this field, FDG-PET has been particularly successful in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, malignant lymphoma and melanoma. Furthermore, FDG-PET has often proven to be superior to morphological imaging techniques for differentiation of tumor recurrence from scar tissue. Due to the high glucose utilization of normal gray matter radiolabeled amino-acids like C-11-methionine are superior to FDG for detection and delineation of brain tumors by PET. In the future, more specific markers of tumor cell proliferation and gene expression may allow the application of PET not only for diagnostic imaging also but for non-invasive biological characterization of malignant tumors and early monitoring of therapeutic interventions.     

Current status of nuclear medicine. Clinical application of FDG-PET for cancer diagnosis. Malignant lymphoma

Malignant lymphoma is one of the tumors that show high FDG uptake, enabling the accurate detection of small involved lesions by FDG-PET. It is useful in both initial staging and follow-up study. In initial staging, FDG-PET is superior to CT from the aspects of sensitivity and specificity, and it is reported that the therapeutic protocol has been changed in 21% of patients. In the follow-up of therapy and detection of recurrence, the accuracy of residual disease is reported to be more than 90%. Among the different pathological types of lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and intermediate-grade NHL are typical indications because of the requirement of accurate staging in determining the therapeutic protocol. One of the shortcomings of FDG-PET is its low specificity. Combination study with PET tracers with higher specificity in tumor diagnosis such as C-11 methionine or F-18 methyltyrosine could be a way to solve this problem.     

2. Diagnostic Utility of FDG-PET in the Clinical Management of Patients with Suspected Recurrent Pancreatic Carcinoma after Whipple Procedure

Purpose: We evaluated the usefulness of FDG-PET in the assessment of patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma who have previously undergone a Whipple procedure.Methods and Materials: Attenuation-corrected FDG-PET was performed in 11 patients (5 males, 6 females, age range 52-76 years), with suspected recurrent pancreatic carcinoma after Whipple procedure. Recurrence was suspected based on clinical, laboratory (CA19-9 serum tumor marker level), or abdominal CT findings. Diagnostic validation was by histology in 2 patients and radiologic or clinical follow-up (5 to 48 months) in 9 patients. Changes in therapeutic management that were prompted by PET were tabulated.Results: PET was concordant with the findings of abdominal CT in 7 patients (6 true-positive, 1 true-negative). PET detected unsuspected lung lesions in 1 of these patients that was subsequently confirmed by a chest CT. PET was discordant with abdominal CT in 4 patients. PET detected tumor recurrence in 3 of 4 patients in this group (27% of total) who had non-diagnostic CT and elevated CA19-9 serology. Chemotherapy was initiated in 2 of these 3 patients (18% of total), while the other patient died shortly after the PET study from pneumonia and recurrent tumor was confirmed at autopsy. The remaining 1 of 4 patients in the discordant group had a false-positive PET study due to relatively high FDG localization in a displaced loop of bowel.Conclusion: PET is useful in localizing the tumor in post-Whipple patients with suspected recurrent pancreatic carcinoma and can impact their clinical management.     

Current status of nuclear medicine clinical application of FDG-PET for cancer diagnosis. Lung cancer

Recent advances in small cyclotrons, PET scanners, and image-processing software have made it possible to apply FDG-PET for clinical use, especially for tumor imaging. Although the efficacy of FDG-PET for several tumors remains a problem under discussion, the efficacy of PET for lung cancer has been studied in great detail and has already been established. The roles of FDG-PET for lung cancer management are, roughly speaking, 1) characterization of pulmonary nodules, 2) staging of lung cancer, 3) monitoring therapeutic effect, and 4) early diagnosis of tumor recurrence. We examined the usefulness of FDG-PET for lung cancer by analyzing our own data and reviewing recent reports. Two image-processing techniques, the image fusion technique and the respiratory-gated data-acquisition method, are also introduced in this article. FDG-PET is a promising method of anatomical imaging that is complementary to such techniques as CT and MRI. It may obtain a more important position among imaging modalities in the future.     

Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in the management of malignant melanoma

FDG-PET is of limited use in patients with early-stage disease without nodal or distant metastases (stage I-II), because sentinel node biopsy is much more sensitive in detecting microscopic lymph node metastases. Because of the high tumor-to-background ratio, FDG-PET can highlight metastases at unusual sites that are easily missed with conventional imaging modalities. PET has been shown to have a strong role in detecting metastatic disease. FDG-PET is more sensitive than CT for detecting metastatic lesions in skin, lymph nodes, and abdomen, but CT is equivalent to or more sensitive than FDG-PET for detecting small pulmonary lesions. FDG-PET identifies the location and number of metastatic lesions in stage III and IV disease and therefore is important for surgical planning. Most of the false-negative FDG-PET results are caused by micrometastases and lesion smaller than 10 mm. Postsurgical inflammation, other inflammatory lesions, and some benign tumors cause some false-positive FDG-PET results.     

The utility of FDG-PET/CT as an effective tool for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer regardless of serum CEA levels

Purpose

Tumor recurrence of colorectal cancers (CRC) is generally followed up by analyses of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. However, recent evidence suggests that tumor recurrence can also be visualized by 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with normal CEA levels. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrence of CRC by comparing PET/CT performance in patients with normal CEA levels with PET/CT performance in patients with elevated CEA levels.

Methods

A total of 235 patients with CRC who had been treated with surgery and/or chemotherapy/radiotherapy underwent PET/CT for the detection of tumor recurrence. The patients [96 females and 139 males; age (mean?±?SD) 59.9?±?12.6?years; range 18?C85] were divided into 2 groups based on whether their CEA levels were normal (<5?ng/ml) (Group 1, n?=?118) or elevated (>5?ng/ml) (Group 2, n?=?117). All of the patients had suspected recurrence based on raised CEA levels, clinical symptoms, and/or tumor detection using other imaging modalities.

Results

Of the 235 patients, 172 (73.1?%) had disease recurrence confirmed by a pathological examination (either biopsy or surgical exploration) or clinical follow-up studies. The FDG-PET/CT study yielded a true positive in detecting recurrence in 169 (71.9?%) patients, a true negative in 53 (22.5?%) patients, a false negative in 3 (1.2?%) patients and a false positive in 10 (4.2?%) patients. CRC recurrence was detected in 64.4?% (76/118) and 88?% (103/117) patients in Group 1 and Group 2 with FDG-PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the FDG-PET/CT study for establishing recurrence were 100, 84, 89.4, 100 and 93.2?%, respectively, for Group 1; by contrast, these parameters were 97.1, 84.6, 98, 78.5 and 95.7?%, respectively, for Group 2. The number of patients with hepatic and extra-hepatic metastases, such as lung and abdominal lymph node metastasis, detected with FDG-PET/CT was significantly different in Group 1 than in Group 2; however, the number of patients with local recurrence and peritoneal implants detected with FDG-PET/CT was not different between the two groups.

Conclusions

FDG-PET/CT can accurately detect tumor recurrence in patients with suspected recurrent CRC, even for patients with normal CEA levels.     

PET-imaging in tumors of the reproductive trac.

There is increasing evidence that metabolic imaging with positron-emission tomography (PET) using fluor-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F FDG) is highly accurate for in vivo detection of a variety of malignancies. This quality gives FDG-PET an important role in the detection of malignant tumors and their metastases as well as for differentiation of tumors of unknown etiology. In the male and female reproductive tract, whole body imaging with FDG-PET is in particular capable of visualizing lymph-node and distant metastases before these changes become apparent on conventional cross-sectional imaging modalities. According to the incidence of tumors in the reproductive tract, FDG-PET-imaging has been evaluated in prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical and testicular cancer. The role of PET is discussed with respect to the current management of patients. The presented data indicate that FDG-PET is more accurate for lymph-node staging in cervical cancer and testicular cancer. In ovarian cancer, FDG-PET may be helpful for detection of tumor recurrence. The role of FDG-PET is questionable in prostate cancer, due to the low metabolic activity of this type of cancer. Carbon-11 labeled acetate and carbon-11 or fluor-18 labeled choline are more promising than FDG for detection of recurrence in prostate cancer. In all other tumors of the reproductive tract there is limited experience with PET for a final conclusion.     

Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET

Establishing new surrogate end points for monitoring response to treatment is needed for current therapy modalities and for new therapeutic strategies including molecular targeted cancer therapies. PET as a functional imaging technology provides rapid, reproducible, noninvasive in vivo assessment and quantification of several biologic processes targeted by these therapies. PET is useful in a variety of clinical relevant applications, including distinguishing between radiation necrosis and tumor recurrence, determining the resectability of recurrent tumor, and evaluating response to therapy. FDG-PET has demonstrated efficacy for monitoring therapeutic response in a wide range of cancers, including breast, esophageal, lung, head and neck, and lymphoma. FDG-PET can assess tumor glucose use with high reproducibility. Following therapy, the decrease of glucose use correlates with the reduction of viable tumor cells. FDG-PET allows the prediction of therapy response early in the course of therapy and determining the viability of residual masses after completion of treatment. The molecular basis for the success of FDG-PET is the rapid reduction of tumor glucose metabolism in effective therapies. Of even higher clinical relevance is the accurate identification of nonresponders in patients without a significant change in tumor glucose metabolism after initiation of therapy. PET imaging can easily visualize these changes in metabolic activity and indicate, sometimes within hours of the first treatment, whether or not a patient will respond to a particular therapy. In contrast to CT, MR imaging, or ultrasound, PET imaging allows identification of responding and nonresponding tumors early in the course of therapy. With this information, physicians can rapidly modify ineffective therapies for individual patients and thereby potentially improve patient outcomes and reduce cost. One of the major limitations for the routine application of FDG-PET imaging for therapy monitoring is that no generally accepted cutoff values have been established to differentiate optimally between responders and nonresponders. The patient series are still relatively small and frequently consist of different tumor types and different therapy regimens. Prospective studies including a sufficient number of patients are needed to define cutoff values to differentiate between responder and nonresponder for different tumors and different treatment regimes. In the future, PET imaging can also serve in the evaluation of new therapeutic agents, new experimental treatments, and specifically in monitoring clinical phase II studies.     

Gastrointestinal tract malignancies and positron emission tomography: an overview

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is highly accurate in restaging colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Overall, it compares favorably with anatomical imaging in the evaluation of tumor recurrence because metabolic abnormalities usually precede a structural change. Initial staging of these malignancies with PET is best used in patients with locally advanced disease who may benefit from curative resection if distant metastases are not found. It also appears to have great potential in predicting histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy and in monitoring the success of radiofrequency ablation and (90)Y microspheres radioembolization soon after intervention. FDG-PET can be used in other gastrointestinal malignancies as a prognostic tool and to detect distant disease but its role has not yet been well defined.     

16. FDG-PET in the Detection of Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer Based on Rising CEA Level. Experience in 72 Patients

Purpose: A rising CEA level after the resection of colorectal cancer is an early indicator of tumour recurrence. However, conventional imaging techniques have limited sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease in such patients. Our group has evaluated the role of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxiglucose (FDG-PET) in this clinical situation.Material and Methods: Seventy-two patients with abnormal CEA levels and normal results of conventional methods of tumour detection were studied with FDG-PET. The PET results were compared with pathologic findings (n = 25) long-term radiological (n = 9) and clinical follow-up (n = 38). Influence of PET findings in therapeutic management was also considered in this study.Results: PET detected lesions in 63/72 patients (87.1%). Metabolic imaging showed metastases in the liver (44.1%), ganglionar nodes (27.5%), local recurrence (20.4%) and lung metastases (8%). Overall, the sensitivity of PET was 94.4%, specificity was 83.3%, the positive-predictive value was 97.1%, the negative-predictive value was 71.4% and the diagnostic accuracy was 92.8%. FDG-PET findings change therapeutic decision in 68/72 patients (94.1%)Conclusion: When conventional examinations are normal, FDG-PET is a valuable imaging tool in patients who have rising CEA level after colorectal surgery. Metabolic imaging represents a very cost-effectiveness diagnostic procedure in this clinical situation, avoiding unnecessary invasive techniques.     

Positron emission tomography for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma

Evaluation of patients with known or suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma is now an accepted indication for FDG PET imaging. FDG PET does not replace imaging modalities such as CT for preoperative anatomic evaluation but is indicated as the initial test for diagnosis and staging of recurrence and for preoperative staging (N and M) of known recurrence that is considered to be resectable. FDG PET imaging is valuable for differentiation of posttreatment changes from recurrent tumor, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions (indeterminate lymph nodes, hepatic and pulmonary lesions), and evaluation of patients with rising tumor markers in the absence of a known source. Addition of FDG PET to the evaluation of these patients reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will and will not benefit from surgical procedures. Although initial staging at the time of diagnosis is often performed during colectomy, FDG PET imaging is recommended for a subgroup of patients at high risk (with elevated CEA levels) and normal CT and for whom surgery can be avoided if FDG PET shows metastases. Screening for recurrence in patients at high risk has also been advocated. FDG PET imaging seems promising for monitoring therapy, but larger studies are necessary.     

Clinical PET in Oncology

The major utilization of clinical PET is in oncology, and oncologic PET utilizes FDG as the radiopharmaceutical. FDG imaging demonstrates the increased metabolism by malignant cells compared to normal cells. The initial clinical application of FDG-PET was demonstrated in brain tumors, and the gradation of accumulation of FDG related to the degree of malignancy. Subsequent studies have documented the accuracy of FDG-PET in detecting and staging several different malignancies. Whole-body imaging has made a major impact on the ability of PET to document the distribution of malignancy.FDG-PET imaging is very accurate in determining if an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule is malignant and in staging lung cancer. The cost-effectiveness of PET has been demonstrated for these indications. Third-party payers have policies for paying for PET scans performed in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules and in staging lung cancer. The preliminary data on the use of FDG-PET imaging in other malignancies supports its use in detecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer and differentiating fibrosis from recurrent tumor after therapy for colorectal cancer; staging the axilla in primary breast cancer; staging melanoma and lymphoma; and staging and detecting recurrence of head and neck cancer. The initial reports on the use of FDG-PET are encouraging in its use in musculoskeletal malignancy, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer.