Basal high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein levels in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism

The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still under discussion because of controversial results in the literature. Conflicting data may have partly been due to bias by exogenous factors altering CRP levels. We investigated CRP concentrations in patients with spontaneous VTE applying a study design that allowed the measurement of basal high sensitivity (hs)-CRP levels. Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n=117) and pulmonary embolism (PE, n=97) were compared to healthy individuals (n=104). Hs-CRP levels (mg/dl) were significantly higher in patients (n=214, median/interquartile range: 0.171/0.082-0.366) than in controls (0.099/0.053-0.245, p=0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for VTE per 1 mg/dl increase of CRP was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-6.8, p=0.03]. This association remained significant after adjustment for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and factor VIII activity above 230% (OR = 2.9, 95% CI [1.1-7.5]), but became remarkably attenuated and lost its statistical significance after adjustment for BMI alone (OR = 1.7 [0.7-4.0]). CRP was also not independently associated with VTE in subgroups of patients (those with DVT without symptomatic PE, those with PE and patients without established risk factor) in multiple regression analysis. In summary, we observed significantly higher basal hs-CRP levels in patients with spontaneous VTE compared to healthy controls. This association was independent of hereditary and laboratory risk factors for VTE, but lost its significance after adjustment for BMI. Increased basal CRP levels do not appear to represent an independent risk factor for VTE.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with unprovoked symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and asymptomatic pulmonary embolism

Patients with a first episode of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) have a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) than patients with a first episode of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients with symptomatic DVT and silent PE may have a different risk of VTE recurrence than patients that have symptomatic DVT without PE. Therefore, it was the aim of this prospective cohort study to compare the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in patients with proximal lower extremity DVT and silent PE to the risk in patients that only have proximal lower extremity DVT. Ninety-one consecutive outpatients presenting to the emergency department of a university hospital subsequently hospitalised with a first episode of unprovoked symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT, and without new pulmonary symptoms were included. Standard initial treatment consisted of intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for 5-7 days, overlapped with oral vitamin-K antagonist therapy, with long-term oral vitamin-K antagonist therapy (goal INR 2.5 [2.0-3.0]). Study endpoints were: symptomatic recurrent DVT, new PE, and recurrent PE, evaluated by standard objective testing. At enrollment, 28 of 91 (31%) patients with DVT had silent PE. In the patients with DVT and silent PE, there were 3 VTE recurrences during 20 person-years of follow-up, while there were no VTE recurrences during 61 person-years of follow- up in the patients with isolated DVT. The Kaplan-Meier estimated VTE recurrence rate at 1 year after the diagnosis of DVT was 11% (95% CI: 2-28%) for patients with symptomatic DVT and silent PE, compared to 0% in patients with isolated symptomatic DVT (p=0.0045). In patients with a first episode of unprovoked symptomatic acute proximal lower extremity DVT, the risk of recurrent VTE was significantly higher in those with silent PE compared to those without PE.     

Incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: prevalence and consequence

Introduction

Careful re-evaluation of CT-scans for cancer staging frequently reveals unsuspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) on CT-scans. However, it is unknown how often these findings lead to anticoagulant treatment in daily clinical practice.

Methods

Reports from thoracic and/or abdominal CT-scans performed in a consecutive series of patients to stage cancer were retrospectively evaluated to determine the prevalence of incidental venous thromboembolism (iVTE). Presence of pre-existing signs of VTE, anticoagulant treatment and 3-month follow-up were analysed in patients with iVTE.

Results

A total of 1466 staging scans (838 patients) from the year 2006 were included in the analysis. The prevalence of VTE in patients was 2.5% (21/838 patients, 95% confidence interval 1.6-3.8%); the prevalence of VTE on scans was 1.4% (21/1466 scans, 95% CI 0.9-2.2%). Incidental PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was observed in 11 (1.3%, 0.7-2.3%) and abdominal vein thrombosis in 9 patients (1.1%, 0.6-2.0%; in the portal (5), mesenteric (3) and renal vein (1), respectively). Nine out of eleven patients with PE/DVT were treated with anticoagulants, while none of the patients with thrombosis in other locations received anticoagulants. One of these patients developed symptomatic PE one month later; otherwise, follow up was uneventful in the untreated patients.

Conclusion

The prevalence of iVTE in patients with cancer in clinical practice is relatively low and most patients with PE or DVT are treated with anticoagulants. For patients with thrombi in other locations, further research is necessary to understand the natural history of these thrombi in order to develop adequate guidelines.     

Different characteristics and prognostic impact of deep-vein thrombosis / pulmonary embolism and intraabdominal venous thrombosis in colorectal cancer patients

This study was performed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Asian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Differences in clinical characteristics and prognostic impact between extremity venous thrombosis (or deep-vein thrombosis; DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) and intra-abdominal venous thrombosis (IVT) were also evaluated. For this study, consecutive CRC patients (N = 2,006) were enrolled and analyses were conducted retrospectively. VTEs were classified into two categories (DVT/PE and IVT). Significant predictors of developing VTEs were advanced stage and an increased number of co-morbidities. The two-year cumulative incidence of DVT/PE was 0.3%, 0.9% and 1.4% in stages 0~1, 2 and 3, respectively; this incidence range of DVT/PE in Asian patients with loco-regional CRC was lower than in Western patients. However, the two-year incidence (6.4%) of DVT/PE in Asian patients with distant metastases was not lower than in Western patients. Although 65.2% of patients with DVT/PE were symptomatic, only 15.7% of patients with IVT were symptomatic. During chemotherapy, DVT/PE developed more frequently than IVT. Only DVT/PE had a negative effect on survival; IVT had no prognostic significance. In conclusion, despite the low incidence of DVT/PE in Asian patients with loco-regional CRC, the protective effect of Asian ethnicity on VTE development disappears as tumour stage increases in patients with distant metastases. Considering different clinical characteristics and prognostic influences between DVT/PE and IVT, the treatment approach should be also different.     

Travel and the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism

Whether long-distance travel and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) are associated is debated. On the basis of the available literature a fair risk estimate cannot be obtained. We estimated an accurate odds ratio for the relationship between recent travelling and symptomatic VTE. From three case-control studies consisting of 788 and 170 patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 989 patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) referred for diagnostic work-up, a pooled odds ratio for the relation between travel and symptomatic VTE was calculated. Cases were patients in whom the diagnosis was confirmed according to a diagnostic management strategy, whereas controls were patients in whom the diagnosis was excluded and who had an uneventful clinical follow-up. Patients were seen in the period April 1997 to September 2000. Travel history was recorded prior to diagnostic work-up. The pooled odds ratio for the association between any travel and symptomatic venous thromboembolism was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.4).The median travel time was 7 h (quartile range 4 to 10 h). Separate analyses performed for different types of transport (plane, car, bus or train) yielded comparable odds ratios. The analysis for duration of travelling showed an increased odds ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.0-6.2) in the category of 10-15 h of travelling. This study shows that the average traveller does not have an increased risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Only very long travelling (more than 10 h) may be associated with venous thromboembolic disease.     

Exclusion of venous thromboembolism: evaluation of D-Dimer PLUS for the quantitative determination of D-dimer

The objective of this study was to evaluate if D-Dimer PLUS (Dade Behring, USA), a rapid fully automated assay, could be used as an initial screening test in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Samples from 274 consecutive symptomatic patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (n=229; 79% outpatients, 21% inpatients), deep venous thrombosis (n=37; 84% outpatients, 16% inpatients) or suspected for both complications (n=8) were tested with this D-dimer assay with a Sysmex CA-1500 Coagulation Analyzer. Clinical probability for pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was staged according to a pretest risk score proposed by Wells. Final diagnosis of PE and/or DVT was established by spiral-computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries or compression ultrasonography, respectively. PE was diagnosed in 13.5% of the patients, whereas DVT was confirmed in 17.7% of the patients. The optimal cut-off value for exclusion of venous thromboembolism was 130 mug/l, and sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 95.0% (95% CI: 92.4-97.6), 30.4% (95% CI: 25.0-35.8) and 97.2% (95% CI: 95.2-99.2), respectively. In fact, two patient with PE were missed using D-Dimer PLUS; both cases were outpatients. In conclusion, this assay appears to be safe when implemented in an algorithm based on clinical assessment, D-dimer concentration, and radiological diagnostic techniques to stratify the risk for PE or DVT. However, higher sensitivities and negative predictive values were claimed in the scarce published reports for the D-Dimer PLUS assay than found in this study.     

Interleukin-6 and interleukin-6 promoter polymorphism (-174) G > C in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism

Increased levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been reported in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, prospective studies did not confirm an association between inflammatory markers that are highly correlated with IL-6 and the risk ofVTE. It was the aim of our study to investigate the association of IL-6 and its promoter polymorphism (-174) G > C with the risk of spontaneousVTE. IL-6 was measured in 128 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT,70 w/58 m),105 with pulmonary embolism (PE, 58 w/47 m) and 122 healthy controls (60 w/62 m) with a highly sensitive ELISA (Quantikine HS Human IL-6 Immunoassay, RnDSystems). The promoter polymorphism was determined by genotyping, allele specific PCR was followed by high resolution gel-electrophoresis. Median concentrations [interquartile ranges] were 2.37 [1.51-3.89] (pg/ml) in patients with DVT, 2.83 [1.83-4.87] in those with PE and 2.51 [1.71-4.78] in controls (p = 0.6, p = 0.4). Hetero- or homozygous carriers of the C allele (71% in DVT, 67% in PE and 59% among controls) did not have higher IL-6 levels than homozygous carriers of the G allele (median 2.60 vs. 2.59 pg/ml, p = 0.7). In conclusion, we found no association of IL-6 and its promoter polymorphism (-174) G > C with the risk of spontaneous VTE.     

Deep vein thrombosis after elective cesarean section

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy is associated with an overall 5-10 fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The absolute risk is highest during and shortly after delivery. Although operative delivery further increases the risk of VTE, there is no consensus on thromboprophylaxis after an elective cesarean. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a low risk cesarean section population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean section were screened for DVT using triplex Doppler sonography 3-5 days after delivery. Markers of activated coagulation were also followed and all women were screened for thrombophilia. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was not given. During the same period all cases of symptomatic VTE were also recorded. RESULTS: No DVT was detected by ultrasonography and no women developed symptomatic VTE during the six weeks follow-up period after delivery. Six women had thrombophilia. During the study period, a cesarean section was performed in 1067/5364 (20%) deliveries. Five of these women (0.47%) developed symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and all of these women had additional risk factors for VTE. CONCLUSION: The risk of DVT among healthy pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section is low, and general medical thromboprophylaxis is probably not justified.     

Predicting recurrences or major bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry

Cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) have an increased incidence of recurrences and bleeding complications while on anticoagulant therapy. Methods RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with acute VTE. We tried to identify which cancer patients are at a higher risk for recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or major bleeding. Up to May 2007, 3,805 cancer patients had been enrolled in RIETE. During the first three months of follow-up after the acute, index VTE event, 90 (2.4%) patients developed recurrent PE, 100 (2.6%) recurrent DVT, 156 (4.1%) had major bleeding. Forty patients (44%) died of the recurrent PE,46 (29%) of bleeding. On multivariate analysis, patients aged <65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-4.9), with PE at entry (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.1), or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis to VTE (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.2) had an increased incidence of recurrent PE. Those aged <65 years (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0-2.4) or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5-3.6) had an increased incidence of recurrent DVT. Finally, patients with immobility (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.7), metastases (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), recent bleeding (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.1), or with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5-3.4), had an increased incidence of major bleeding. With some variables available at entry we may identify those cancer patients withVTE at a higher risk for recurrences or major bleeding.     

神经外科术后静脉栓塞症发病率及早期诊断

目的对神经外科术后患者静脉栓塞症（深静脉血栓和肺栓塞）发病率及早期诊断进行前瞻性研究。方法37例神经外科术后患者均按照静脉血栓预防指南进行了弹力袜和（或）四肢间隙气动压迫的预防性治疗。在术后平均12d进行血管彩色超声检查,并通过增强CT扫描明确诊断。结果本组研究中下肢深静脉血栓发生率为13．5％,在发生深静脉血栓患者中肺栓塞发生率为60％,所有静脉血栓患者在临床上均没有症状。结论在神经外科术后患者中静脉血栓症的发病率很高,在采用了预防措施后部分患者依然不能避免,早期预防和早期发现对于减少神经外科术后静脉栓塞症非常重要。     

Venous thromboembolism and fractured neck of femur

The post-operative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is high for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Proven prophylactic measures are available although underutilized due to concern on post-operative bleeding with use of anticoagulants. This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical incidence of VTE and utilisation of thromboprophylactic protocols over an eight year period. Demographic details, mechanism of injury, VTE risk factors, prophylactic modalities (mechanical and pharmacological), operation duration, mode of anaesthesia, hospital length of stay (LOS) and post-operative complications with particular attention to suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) were analysed. Male to female ratio was 1:2.7 with a median age of 78 years (IQR: 70-86 years) and 83 years (IQR: 77-87 years) respectively (p<0.001). Median hospital LOS was 8 days (IQR: 5-13 days) and differed with mechanism of injury.The in-hospital incidence of VTE was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.1-2.5%) with a probably underestimated three month rate of 8.2% (95% CI: 5.3-12.4%). Non fatal PE was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-1.0%) in-hospital and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.2-5.5%) at three months. Fatal PE was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-1.0%) with a three month incidence of 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1-2.4%).The in-hospital VTE incidence was kept relatively low with use of prophylactic protocols with almost all patients receiving prophylaxis by the end of the study period. Given the five-fold out of hospital increase in incidence, consideration should be given to continue prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge in this high risk group of patients.     

Role of fibrinolysis and interventional therapy for acute venous thromboembolism

The initial goals of treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are usually achieved with anticoagulation. This review focuses on fibrinolysis and interventional therapy in VTE, treatments whose indications are much more controversial. The benefit-to-risk ratio of fibrinolysis in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is dubious. Thrombolytic treatment is recommended for unstable patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), although these patients represent less than 5% of all patients hospitalized for PE. The use of thrombolytic treatment in patients with sub-massive PE remains controversial. Two indications are widely recognized for inferior vena cava filters: the first is a permanent or temporary contraindication to anticoagulation, in patients with proximal DVT or PE. The second is the occurrence of PE or propagation of the thrombus in patients treated for DVT or recurrence in patients with PE. The PREPIC study demonstrated that in acute VTE, vena cava filters reduced the risk of PE but increased that of DVT and had no effect on survival. The fact that prevention of PE is mainly observed during the short initial period following the diagnosis of an acute VTE event justifies a new randomized study with the use of retrievable filters as an adjuvant to anticoagulation in high risk patients with PE.     

Dose-escalation study of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention of thromboembolic disorders. The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof-of-principle for rivaroxaban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, dose-escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, relative to enoxaparin, for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip replacement surgery. Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to rivaroxaban (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg twice daily [bid] or 30 mg once daily [od] starting 6-8 h after surgery) or enoxaparin (40 mg od starting the evening before surgery). Therapy continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5-9 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients received therapy, of whom 466 patients were eligible for the per-protocol efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint - deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or all-cause mortality - occurred in 22.2%, 23.8%, 20.0%, 10.2%, 17.4%, 15.1% and 16.8% of patients receiving rivaroxaban 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30 mg bid, 30 mg od and enoxaparin, respectively. The dose-response relationship with rivaroxaban for the primary efficacy endpoint was not statistically significant (p=0.0504), although major VTE (proximal DVT, PE and VTE-related death) decreased dose dependently with rivaroxaban (p=0.0108). Major, post-operative bleeding increased dose dependently with rivaroxaban (p=0.0008), occurring in 0-10.8% of patients, compared with 0% in patients receiving enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated proof-of-principle for rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE after total hip replacement surgery.     

Increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism during hormone replacement therapy--results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled estrogen in venous thromboembolism trial (EVTET)

Recent observational studies suggest a 2-4 fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The present study was started before publication of these studies, and the aim was to determine if HRT alters the risk of VTE in high risk women. The study was a randomized. double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial with a double-triangular sequential design. Females with previously verified VTE were randomized to 2 mg estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate, 1 tablet daily (n = 71) or placebo (n = 69). The primary outcome was recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Between 1996 and 1998 a total of 140 women were included. The study was terminated prematurely based on the results of circumstantial evidence emerging during the trial. Eight women in the HRT group and one woman in the placebo group developed VTE. The incidence of VTE was 10.7% in the HRT group and 2.3% in the placebo group. In the HRT group, all events happened within 261 days after inclusion. The sequential design did not stop the study, but strongly indicated a difference between the two groups. Our data strongly suggests that women who have previously suffered a VTE have an increased risk of recurrence on HRT. This treatment should therefore be avoided in this patient group if possible. The results also support those of recent epidemiological studies, which also indicate increased risk of VTE in non-selected female populations during HRT.     

Incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with previous pulmonary embolism. A retrospective cohort study

There is little information available about the true incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of PTS in patients with previous pulmonary embolism without concomitant ultrasonographically-detectable deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care centre, Cosenza, Italy. Forty-seven consecutive patients with proved PE without DVT within the previous 2 to 6 years, 45 patients with previous DVT in the same years, and 45 patients with diseases unrelated to venous thromboembolism (VTE) underwent a blind assessment for PTS using a clinical score. Two of 47 (4.2%, 95%CI: 0.01-9.9) patients with PE, 2 of 45 (4.4%, 95%CI: 0.01-10.4) patients with diseases unrelated to VTE, and 23 of 45 (53.3%, 95%CI: 38.7-67.9) patients with DVT showed signs and symptoms of PTS. The difference between the first two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.7). In conclusion, the incidence of PTS after pulmonary embolism without DVT is low, and no different from that of patients without previous VTE.     

Factors associated with the timing of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: results from the MASTER registry

INTRODUCTION: Signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are non-specific and thus can make diagnosis difficult, even for an experienced clinician. We aimed to evaluate the timing of diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in Italian hospitals and to identify individual and clinical predictors of timely or delayed diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MASTER is a multicenter prospective registry of patients with acute DVT and PE. Information on clinical presentation and diagnostic methods, temporary and permanent risk factors, were captured by an electronic data network at the time of the index event. RESULTS: Data on 2047 patients (1024 males), 1505 with DVT and 542 with PE, were analysed. Delayed diagnosis (i.e. more than 10 days from onset of symptoms) was observed in 340 (22.6%) patients with DVT and in 88 (16.2%) with PE, respectively. In DVT patients, factors associated with earlier diagnosis were the presence of multiple signs or symptoms (p=0.014), the presence of pain (p=0.049), and previous venous thrombosis (p=0.016). Neither the presence of other known risk factors nor ongoing prophylaxis influenced the timing of diagnosis. In PE patients, only multiple signs or symptoms at presentation (p=0.014) and the presence of transient risk factors (p=0.001) were significantly associated with earlier diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial delays occur when diagnosing both DVT and PE. The severity of presentation, but not patient risk profile are associated with earlier diagnosis, even in patients with signs or symptoms of PE.     

Prevalence and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND: Little information exists on the prevalence and prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients admitted for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To review available literature, we performed a Medline search on papers published on this topic between 1966 and 2003. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pulmonary emboli have been frequently found (up to 30% of cases) in autoptic series that included patients who died from acute exacerbation of COPD, while the real incidence of PE during exacerbation has never been prospectively evaluated by large-scale clinical studies. Diagnosis of concomitant PE in these patients is often missed because symptoms of acute exacerbation of COPD may mimic PE, and non-invasive evaluation by pulmonary scintigraphy or CT scan is less specific. Even if not fatal, undetected and untreated PE may lead to long-term morbidity from pulmonary hypertension and predispose to recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). DVT of the lower extremities affects about 10% of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD at admission, but the rate is likely to be underestimated. The results of clinical trials conducted on general medical patients, including COPD patients, indicate that unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) significantly reduce VTE rates. However, subgroup data on COPD patients are generally not available. In a single randomised, controlled trial specifically conducted on COPD patients, nadroparin reduced the rate of DVT from 28% to 15% without affecting mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a substantial lack of consistent data, VTE appears as a major threat to patients admitted for acute exacerbation of COPD, and pharmacologic prophylaxis should be considered in all high risk situations. However, methodologically rigorous studies in this setting are still needed.     

The role of inherited thrombophilia in patients with isolated pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common vascular disease that results in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) and G20210A prothrombin mutation (PTM) are associated with an increased risk of VTE. Recent studies have reported a lower prevalence of FVL in patients with isolated PE than in patients with DVT with or without PE, suggesting the possibility that the prevalence of FVL in patients with isolated PE may be not significantly different from that of the general population. To address this issue, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of published studies that assessed the prevalence of FVL and/or PTM in patients with isolated PE and in controls without VTE.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to October 2013. Pooled odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochran Q and I² statistics.

Results

Eighteen studies totalling more than 11,000 patients were included. FVL was found significantly more often in patients presenting isolated PE than in controls (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.66, 2.56; p < 0.0001). The prevalence of PTM was also significantly different in patients presenting with isolated PE than in controls (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.92, 3.63; p < 0.0001). Heterogeneity among studies was low.

Conclusion

FVL and PTM are both associated with isolated PE. However, the association magnitude between PE and FVL mutation appeared to be lower compared to that observed in the general population of VTE patients.     

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. A “real-life” perspective in 103 patients

Introduction

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to analyze in real life, tolerance, recurrence, bleeding and adverse events of rivaroxaban in patients with acute symptomatic VTE.

Material and Methods

Open follow-up study of a cohort of patients aged 18 and over diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with rivaroxaban from December 2011 to January 2014.

Results

The total number of patients treated with rivaroxaban was 103. The mean age was 58 +/-17 years. The most frequent co-morbidities were: hypertension (30.0%), dyslipidemia (23.3%) and respiratory disease (25.2%). The type of thromboembolic event treated was: DVT (64.1%), PE (18.4%), DVT + PE (17.5%). Of the rivaroxaban-treated patients, 30% did so from the initial anticoagulant therapy and the other 70% in long-term or extended anticoagulant therapy. The median time of treatment with rivaroxaban was 5 months. There was one recurrence and no deaths occurred. Six patients had bleeding, one of which was severe.

Conclusions

Rivaroxaban provides a therapeutic alternative in a group of patients with VTE with advantages over VKAs, because of the convenience in dosing, lack of requirements for periodic monitoring and limited interaction with other drugs.     

Dermatan sulphate for the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. DOS (Dermatan sulphate in Oncologic Surgery) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for cancer are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Agents that selectively inhibit thrombin, such as dermatan sulphate, have potential for a favourable benefit-risk ratio in the prevention of this complication. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective abdominal, thoracic, gynecologic or urologic surgery for cancer resection, were randomised to dermatan sulphate (600 mg intramuscularly on the second day before surgery, then 300 mg once daily), or calcium heparin (5,000 IU subcutaneously t.i.d., starting 2 hours before operation). Both treatments were continued until postoperative day 7 or until adequate mobilisation was achieved. Bilateral venography was scheduled at the end of treatment. Venograms were centrally assessed in blind conditions. The study outcomes were VTE (venographically proven deep vein thrombosis IDVT] or symptomatic, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism) and bleeding complications. RESULTS: At 27 centres, 842 patients were randomised and underwent surgery (418 dermatan sulphate, 424 heparin). Efficacy was assessed in 521 patients with adequate venography and/or confirmed pulmonary embolism. DVT was observed in a total of 96 patients; symptomatic non-fatal pulmonary embolism developed in 2 patients (one per group), who also had DVT at venography. Postoperative VTE occurred in 40 of 267 patients on dermatan sulphate, 15.0%, versus 56 of 254 patients on heparin. 22.0% (p = 0.033). Relative risk reduction was 32.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 53.2%). The rate of bleeding complications in all operated patients was 6.9% with dermatan sulphate and 7.5% with heparin (confidence interval for the absolute risk difference, -4.1 to 2.9%). The inhospital mortality rate was 1.2% and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In oncologic surgery, dermatan sulphate prevents VTE more effectively than heparin without increasing bleeding complications.