Testing with growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF(1–29)NH2) and somatomedin C measurements for the evaluation of growth hormone deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) responses to GRF (1 μg/kg BW i.v.) were investigated. Comparison between GRF(1–40) and GRF(1–29)NH2 in 11 young adult volunteers gave identical results. One hundred and thirty-one children and adolescents (45 with idiopathic GHD) were tested with GRF (1–29)NH2. The maximal GH levels (max GH) in response to GRF during the 120 min test period were found suitable to characterize the response. In cases without GHD no correlation to age, sex and pubertal development was observed. A maximal GH level of above 10 ng/ml was found to be normal. In 3 out of 86 children without GHD (one with Turner syndrome; two with simple obesity) max GH fell short of 10 ng/ml, while 11 of 45 cases with GHD exceeded this margin. In GHD, max GH was inversely correlated with age. There was no difference in max GH between groups with or without perinatal pathology as a presumed cause of GHD. GH levels to GRF were positively correlated with maximal GH level during sleep in GHD, but not correlated with responses seen to insulin or arginine. The value of GRF testing for the confirmation of GHD is discussed in the light of other GH stimulatory tests and basal somatomedin C measurements. It is suggested that the combination of testing with GRF and the determination of a basal SmC level offers a safe and convenient way to diagnose GHD in clinically suspected cases, though in some cases further diagnostic tests may be needed. Dedicated to Professor A. M. Bongiovanni, M.D.     

Administration of arginine plus growth hormone releasing hormone to evaluate growth hormone (GH) secretory status in children with GH deficiency

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood is usually based on growth hormone (GH) response to at least two provocative stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine whether sequential administration of arginine (Arg) plus GH releasing hormone (GHRH) could be a useful tool in evaluating GHD in children. METHODS: Thirty patients with short stature (mean age 9.0 years) with decreased growth rate were tested for GHD with Arg and the insulin tolerance test (ITT). Patients with confirmed GHD (peak GH <8 ng/ml) were subsequently tested with Arg + GHRH. RESULTS: Maximum GH stimulation for Arg and ITT was 6.3 (1.0-7.8) and 6.7 (0.5-7.7) ng/ml, respectively. Peak GH for the Arg + GHRH test was 36.3 (4.3-84.5) ng/ml and significantly different from the other provocative tests. Peak GH values for the three tests were not significantly correlated between tests or with clinical parameters. There were no significant differences in Arg + GHRH results between children with or without abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary MRI scans. CONCLUSION: Arg + GHRH gave higher GH levels than insulin or Arg alone. Because of the different causes of childhood GHD (hypothalamic and/or pituitary dysfunction), the Arg + GHRH test is unsuitable .for evaluating GHD and deciding whether GH replacement therapy is indicated.     

The catecholamine response to hypoglycemia in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency syndromes and multiple pituitary hormone defects

We examined the catecholamine response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in 46 short children evaluated for growth hormone (GH) deficiency by both pharmacologic stimulation and integrated concentration of GH. Twelve patients had quantitatively normal GH secretion by both pharmacologic stimulation and integrated concentration of GH (GHNORM). Twenty-two patients had normal GH to pharmacologic stimulation but subnormal integrated concentration of GH (GHND). Twelve patients had GH deficiency by both tests (GHD): six had isolated GH deficiency (GHD type 1) and six had multiple hormone deficiencies (GHD type 2). There was no significant difference between the peak epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol responses of GH-NORM, GHND, and GHD type 1 patients. The mean peak epinephrine response of GHD type 2 patients was significantly lower (564 +/- 561 pg/ml, p less than 0.03) compared to the other patient groups. There was no significant difference between the peak norepinephrine levels between GHD type 2 patients and the remaining groups. There was no correlation between decrease in blood glucose and either increase in growth hormone, catecholamine, or cortisol concentrations. There was a significant correlation between log peak epinephrine and peak cortisol response (r = 0.53, p less than 0.0002) of the 46 subjects. Neither the basal nor stimulated catecholamine levels correlated with the integrated concentration of cortisol. We conclude that isolated GH deficiency is not associated with impairment of the catecholamine response to hypoglycemia; impairment of the epinephrine response to hypoglycemia is only associated with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; in children, the degree of glucose lowering is not correlated with the magnitude of peak GH, catecholamine, or cortisol responses.     

Diagnostic value of growth hormone-releasing hormone test in children and adolescents with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

Average growth hormone (GH) peaks following an i.v. growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) 1–29 stimulation test were significantly lower in 48 children and adolescents with GH deficiency (GHD) than in 20 age-matched controls (15.2+12.7 vs 37.5+28.1 ng/ml, 2P<0.001). Twelve patients exhibited a low GH peak (<5 ng/ml), 27 demonstrated a normal response (>10 ng/ml) and 9 showed an intermediate rise in plasma GH (5–10 ng/ml). Six of the 12 patients with low GH response to the first GHRH stimulation failed to respond to two other tests immediately before and after a 1 week priming with s.c. GHRH. These subjects with subnormal GH increase at repeat testing had total GHD (TGHD) and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) and had suffered from perinatal distress. On the contrary, 26 of 27 patients with normal GH response to the first test had isolated GHD and only a minority (8/27) had signs of perinatal distress. It is concluded that perinatal injuries primarily damage pituitary structures and that a pituitary defect more probably underlies more severe forms (TGHD and MPHD) of GHD.Presented in part at the 7th Meeting of the Italian Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (Milan, 20–21 October 1989)     

Growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing factor in sickle cell disease

Many children with sickle cell disease (SCD) have impaired growth during childhood and adolescence, with patterns of growth consistent with constitutional delay in growth and pubertal development (CDGD). We evaluated the growth hormone (GH) response to a rapid intravenous (i.v.) infusion of growth hormone releasing factor (GRF, 1-44, 1 microgram/kg) in six children with SCD whose growth patterns and bone ages were consistent with CDGD. The peak GH response of the SCD patients to GRF (29.2 +/- 14.3 ng/ml, mean +/- SD, n = 6) was not statistically significantly different from the peak GH response of the control children (29.0 +/- 6.3 ng/ml, mean +/- SD, n = 7). These findings suggest that pituicyte GH response to GRF is intact and is not the cause of the observed impaired growth in patients with SCD.     

Growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (hp GHRH1-44) as an index of growth hormone secretory dysfunction after prophylactic cranial irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (24 grays)

The growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing hormone hp GHRH1-44 (2 micrograms/kg i.v.) was studied in 19 prepubertal children who had been irradiated with 24 Gy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphosarcoma (LS) at a mean chronological age of 4 10/12 years (limits 10/12 to 9 years). They were evaluated after a mean time interval of 4 8/12 +/- 3/12 years and compared to 14 prepubertal children with constitutional short stature (CSS). The individual responses to GHRH were decreased in all but three of the irradiated children. The mean GH response was 16.7 +/- 2.5 ng/ml as compared to 52.6 +/- 8.5 ng/ml in the control group (p less than 0.001). The GH response to GHRH was not correlated with the GH response to arginine-insulin tolerance test (AITT). A decreased response to GHRH with values between 12.5 and 19.4 ng/ml was observed in four cases with normal growth rates and normal GH responses to AITT. These results suggest that an impaired GH response to GHRH is a frequent finding after cranial irradiation for ALL or LS and may be the only sign of GH secretory dysfunction. It is probably indicative of early hypothalamic impairment of GH secretion.     

Results of early reevaluation of growth hormone secretion in short children with apparent growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that normalization of the growth hormone (GH) response to stimulation in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hypothalamic-pituitary area might occur earlier than at attainment of final height. STUDY DESIGN: Prepubertal children with short stature (21 boys and 12 girls; age, 5.2-10 years), in whom a diagnosis of GHD was based on a GH response <10 microg/L after 2 pharmacologic tests (clonidine, arginine, or insulin hypoglycemia), and normal MRI of the hypothalamic-pituitary area were studied. After 1 to 6 months, all children underwent reevaluation of GH secretion by means of one of the provocative tests previously used. During that time, none of the children received GH therapy or entered puberty. RESULTS: A GH response > or =10 microg/L after retesting was found in 28 patients, and a GH response <10 microg/L was found in 5. In 9 patients, the peak GH response at diagnosis was <7 microg/L to both tests used. In 8, the GH response at retesting was > or =10 microg/L and was 9.0 microg/L in the remaining child. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that patients with pathologic GH responses to provocative tests but normal MRI should be reevaluated and followed up before a diagnosis of GHD is firmly established.     

Growth hormone response to GRF 1-44 in children following cranial irradiation for central nervous system tumors

The growth hormone (GH) responses to (A) GRF 1-44, 1 microgram/kg i.v., (B) L-dopa and either arginine, insulin, or glucagon, and (C) exercise were evaluated in 10 children (3 girls, 7 boys; ages 10 years to 15 years, 8 months), 2-10.75 years following cranial irradiation for medulloblastoma (8 patients), pineoblastoma (1 patient), and a fourth ventricular ependymoma (1 patient). Nine of the 10 children had abnormal growth rates. All children were euthyroid at the time of the study. The mean 0-60-min peak GH response to GRF (10.06 +/- 2.6 ng/ml) in the patients was less than the mean peak GH response (29 +/- 2.3 ng/ml) in the control children (n = 7). In 6 patients (5 with poor growth rates), a decreased GH response was noted to GRF and all other tests. Of the remaining patients, all with poor growth rates, two patients demonstrated an adequate response to GRF and pharmacologic testing; one patient had a normal GH response to GRF with a low GH response to pharmacologic testing; and one patient had a low response to GRF, despite a normal response to both exercise and pharmacologic testing. The decrease in mean peak GH response to GRF in the patient population confirms that radiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary region produces abnormalities in growth hormone release. Furthermore, in these patients, discordant GH responses to GRF and pharmacologic or physiologic tests can be observed. The abnormality in growth hormone release may result from a hypothalamic dysfunction in GRF release and/or damage to GH secretory pituicytes.     

Somatostatin infusion withdrawal in the diagnosis of childhood growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation of growth hormone (GH) testing for GH deficiency (GHD) in childhood is confounded by the lack of a world-wide consensus on the definition of GHD. Although a single GH test remains the most powerful biochemical tool in the evaluation of a child with growth failure, the test remains far from ideal. Withdrawal of somatostatin (SS) infusion is followed by a rebound rise of GH thought to be mediated by endogenous GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) function. This study was designed to compare the GH response to 90 min SS infusion in children with normal GH secretion versus children with GH deficiency. METHODS: Ten children with GHD and 10 healthy controls (NC) have been evaluated for GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal (SSIW) and compared with response of two provocative tests, glucagon plus propranolol test and L-Dopa test. All children received constant infusion of somatostatin for 90 min (3 microg/kg per h, Stilamin, Serono, Aubonne, Switzerland). In order to determine GH, blood samples were obtained 90 min before the SS infusion and 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after the cessation of infusion. RESULTS: Growth hormone peak levels with SSIW were significantly lower in GH deficient children than in healthy children (2.5 +/- 1.2 ng/dL, vs 21.9 +/- 5.3 ng/dL, respectively, P < 0.01). No adverse effects were observed during or after somatostatin infusion. CONCLUSION: In the present study, SSIW elicited a significant GH rise in healthy children but not in children with GH deficiency. Although further controlled studies using more data are necessary to expand these findings, the results suggested that children with GH deficiency can be reliably discriminated from healthy children by SSIW.     

Circulating immunoreactive growth hormone releasing hormone concentrations and growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing hormone in short children

To study the role of peripheral immunoreactive growth hormone releasing hormone (ir-GHRH) concentrations and the GHRH test in the evaluation of growth hormone (GH) secretion in short stature, 46 children with a mean age of 9.4 years (range 1.6–16.3 years) and a mean relative height score of –3.2 SD (range –5.0–2.1 SD) were investigated. The children were divided into prepubertal (n=35) and pubertal (n=11) and the prepubertal children further into three groups based on their maximal GH responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (IIH) and clonidine: (1) GH deficient subjects (maximal GH<10 g/l in both test); (2) discordant responders (maximal GH<10 g/l in one test and 10 g/l in the other); and (3) normal responders (maximal GH10 g/l in both test). Peripheral ir-GHRH concentrations were measured during the IIH test by radioimmunoassay after purification of plasma samples on Sep-pak cartridges. Among the prepubertal children 10 fell into group 1, 16 into group 2 and 9 into group 3. Children in group 1 were older, than those in group 3. There were no significant differences in relative heights and weights or absolute and relative growth velocities between the groups. Subjects in groups 1 and 2 had lower maximal GH responses to GHRH than those in group 3. There were no significant differences in the basal plasma ir-GHRH concentrations between the groups. Nine children (19.6%) had somatotrophs with a poor response to a single dose of exogenous GHRH (maximal GH<10 g/l). These subjects had increased basal plasma ir-GHRH concentrations. All of them had a decreased GH response to IIH and/or clonidine. Pubertal children had higher circulating ir-GHRH levels than the prepubertal subjects. There was an inverse correlation (r=–0.46;P<0.001) between the maximal GH response to GHRH and calendar age in the whole series. These observations suggest that: (1) a substantial proportion of short children have a heterogenous GH response to pharmacological stimuli necessitating complementary evaluation of their spontaneous GH secretion; (2) a poor response to exogenous GHRH is associated with increased ir-GHRH levels in the peripheral circulation; (3) all children with normal GH responses in pharmacological tests respond normally to GHRH and (4) the pituitary sensitivity to GHRH decreases with increasing age. Peripheral ir-GHRH concentrations do not differentiate between short children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and those with undefined short stature. The GHRH test is of limited value in the diagnosis of GHD, since a normal GH response does not exclude GHD, although a subnormal response appears to reflect dysfunctional GH secretion.     

Diagnostic limitations of spontaneous growth hormone measurements in normally growing prepubertal children

To evaluate whether the measurement of the spontaneous overnight growth hormone secretion in prepubertal children clearly separated normal children from subjects with growth hormone deficiency, we studied 45 prepubertal normally growing children (10 with normal height and 35 with constitutional growth delay) and compared their overnight growth hormone secretion with that of a group of subjects with either isolated growth hormone deficiency or neurosecretory dysfunction. Peak growth hormone levels (greater than or equal to 10 ng/mL) following oral clonidine administration were normal in individuals with normal height, constitutional growth delay, and neurosecretory dysfunction, as was the basal somatomedin C concentration; subjects with growth hormone deficiency had low peak growth hormone levels (less than 10 ng/mL) following oral clonidine administration as well as low basal somatomedin C values. The mean 9-hour overnight growth hormone concentration, total growth hormone output, total number of nocturnal pulses, and the mean peak growth hormone response during nocturnal sampling were similar in the normal height and constitutional growth delay groups and significantly greater than those seen in subjects with either growth hormone deficiency or neurosecretory dysfunction. Twelve (26.6%) of 45 normally growing children (4 to 10 normal height and 8 of 35 constitutional growth delay), however, had low overnight growth hormone levels (less than 3 ng/mL), which overlapped results obtained in the growth hormone-deficient or neurosecretory dysfunction groups. Frequent overnight growth hormone (GH) sampling does not always separate normal-growing children from those with partial or complete GH deficiency. In our this study over one quarter of the normally growing children had overnight GH levels in the range of children with either GH deficiency or neurosecretory dysfunction. These findings, in addition to the cost and difficulty in performing this test, do not support the measurement of spontaneous GH as a routine test in short but normally growing prepubertal children.     

A practical approach to the diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in patients transitioning to adulthood using GH stimulation testing

To establish the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD), GH-deficient children transitioning to adulthood are evaluated by two separate stimuli 2 or more weeks after ceasing GH therapy. While 20-88% of children diagnosed with idiopathic GHD retest with normal values, those with proven genetic defects in GH production/secretion/bioactivity and patients with panhypopituitarism consistently test deficient. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines GHD in adults by stimulated peak serum GH concentrations <5 ng/ml if measured by polyclonal radioimmunoassays (RIA) or lower if measured by monoclonal assays. Some investigators define severe GHD by a peak GH concentration <3 ng/ml. Adult responses to arginine and glucagon testing are similar to the responses to insulin tolerance testing; clonidine, pyridostigmine, and galanin cause lesser peaks of GH. Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) combined with arginine, GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), or hexarelin leads to higher peak responses than GHRH alone. Thus the choice of testing methods impacts the diagnosis of GHD in transition patients.     

Screening test for growth hormone deficiency: Usefulness of L-dopa-propranolol provocative test

This is a retrospective review of 185 short children who were tested for growth hormone (GH) secretion using the L-dopa-propranolol provocative test. One hundred and thirty-three children were deemed to have passed the screening test when a GH concentration of greater than 15 miu/L was elicited after stimulation. Fifty-two failed the screening test, of which 33 were diagnosed as having growth hormone deficiency (GHD) when they had inadequate growth hormone response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. The other 19 were low-responders since they showed adequate GH response to insulin tolerance test (ITT). The low-responder rate to L-dopa-propranolol provocative test among short children who are not GH deficient was 12.5%. The low cost of L-dopa and propranolol, the simplicity and safety of the test, and the acceptable rate of low-responders make the test an effective screening test for GHD.     

Evaluation of growth hormone release and human growth hormone treatment in children with cranial irradiation-associated short stature

We studied nine children who had received cranial irradiation for various malignancies and subsequently experienced decreased growth velocity. Their response to standard growth hormone stimulation and release tests were compared with that in seven children with classic GH deficiency and in 24 short normal control subjects. With arginine and L-dopa stimulation, six of nine patients who received radiation had a normal GH response (greater than 7 ng/ml), whereas by design none of the GH deficient and all of the normal children had a positive response. Only two of nine patients had a normal response to insulin hypoglycemia, with no significant differences in the mean maximal response of the radiation and the GH-deficient groups. Pulsatile secretion was not significantly different in the radiation and GH-deficient groups, but was different in the radiation and normal groups. All subjects in the GH-deficient and radiation groups were given human growth hormone for 1 year. Growth velocity increased in all, with no significant difference in the response of the two groups when comparing the z scores for growth velocity of each subject's bone age. We recommend a 6-month trial of hGH in children who have had cranial radiation and are in prolonged remission with a decreased growth velocity, as there is no completely reliable combination of GH stimulation or release tests to determine their response.     

心得安运动激发试验对儿童生长激素缺乏症的诊断价值

目的 探讨心得安运动激发试验对儿童生长激素缺乏症(GHD)的诊断价值.方法 选择在2009年1月至2013年3月期间因身材矮小症住院,同时完善胰岛素激发和心得安运动激发两项试验的儿童,共120例,记录激发试验前后静脉血GH值.将激发试验后血GH峰值<10 ng/mL定义为激发阴性,GH峰值≥10 ng/mL定义为激发阳性.将两项激发试验后血GH峰值均<10 ng/mL者诊断为GHD.结果 120例矮小儿童中,诊断为GHD者29例(24.2%).胰岛素激发试验阳性率为48.3%.心得安运动激发试验阳性率为65.8%.两项激发试验的总符合率为62.5%,阳性符合率为79.3%.心得安运动激发后血GH峰值显著高于胰岛素激发试验的GH峰值.胰岛素激发试验血GH峰值多出现在试验后30~60 min,心得安运动激发试验GH峰值多出现在试验后的120 min.心得安运动激发试验未见不良反应发生.结论 心得安运动激发试验与胰岛素激发试验对GH的激发结果符合率较高,且比胰岛素激发试验更易刺激GH分泌,临床可考虑同时应用胰岛素激发试验、心得安运动激发试验联合诊断GHD.     

Caloric restriction for 24 hours increases mean night growth hormone.

In obesity, serum growth hormone (GH) is usually low, confounding GH assessment of short obese children. We evaluated whether 24-h caloric restriction would permit better discrimination between normal GH secretion and GH deficiency (GHD) by elevating night GH levels. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Serum was obtained every 20 minutes 2000-0800 h before and 2200-0400 h after 24 hours of caloric restriction (8% of usual calories) in 24 normal height children [14 normal (weight for height 10-90th percentile); 10 obese (weight for height > 95th percentile)] and in 31 short children (height shorter than -2.0 SD below mean for age). All samples from both nights per child were assayed for GH simultaneously to eliminate interassay variability. RESULTS: Mean GH increased significantly in all groups after caloric restriction (P < 0.01). Obese children had lower baseline mean GH and GH amplitude compared to normal (P < 0.01); GH increased into normal range after restriction. Basal GH studies in short children were not significantly below normal. Surprisingly, some with low stimulated GH increased their night GH into the normal range after caloric restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric restriction for 24 h enhances night GH similarly in short and in normal children, and thus does not increase the diagnostic utility of night GH studies in non-obese short children. Caloric restriction reverses suppressed GH secretory state of obese children, perhaps by decreasing diet-dependent somatostatin inhibition of GH secretion.     

Final height in Swedish children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency enrolled in KIGS treated optimally with growth hormone

Aim: To assess final height in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treated with human recombinant growth hormone (GH). Methods: Final height data for 401 Swedish children with idiopathic GHD and treated with GH, included in KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) between 1987 and spring 2006, were analysed retrospectively. Data were grouped according to sex, age and severity of GHD. Height at entry into KIGS, at the onset of puberty and near final height were analysed between groups. Results: Groups were heterogeneous for GHD, which ranged from partial to severe. For all groups, mean final height corrected for mid‐parental height was within the normal Swedish height range. In patients with severe GHD, mean final height was almost identical to mean normal Swedish height. About 16% of patients showed disproportionality (short legs) at final height and were significantly shorter than other patients. The parents of these children also demonstrated short stature. Conclusion: Children with idiopathic GHD receiving GH replacement therapy can achieve a final height that as a group is within the normal range and all achieve a height within their genetic potential.     

Reevaluation of growth hormone deficiency during and after growth hormone (GH) treatment: diagnostic value of GH tests and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements

Retesting of patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD), especially those with idiopathic GHD, has yielded normalization of the results in several studies. The aim of this study was to reevaluate patients diagnosed as GHD at completion or reconfirm the diagnosis before completion of GH treatment by retesting with provocative tests, and to evaluate the value of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in the diagnosis of GHD. Fifty (33 M, 17 F) patients with GHD (peak GH level <0.46 pmol/l (10 ng/ml]) in two pharmacological tests were retested and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels measured. The age of the patients at retest was 15.2+/-5.0 yr. Thirteen of 50 patients (26%) normalized their GH secretion. According to the initial diagnosis, 69% of those with partial GHD (peak GH level 0.32-0.46 pmol/l [7-10 ng/ml]), 43% with isolated GHD, 33% idiopathic and 11% of those with complete GHD (peak GH level <0.32 pmol/l [7 ng/ml]) normalized their GH level at retesting. None of the patients with multiple hormone deficiency and none with small pituitary on MRI normalized GH levels at retest. The sensitivities of IGF-I and of IGFBP-3 were 70% and 67%, respectively, and the specificities were 100%, when peak GH cutoff is taken as 0.46 pmol/l (10 ng/ml) for the diagnosis of GHD. The sensitivities of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 increased to 76.5% and 73.5% when the cutoff level for GHD is taken as 0.32 pmol/l (7 ng/ml). Those patients who normalized their GH levels at retest showed a satisfactory height velocity when GH therapy was discontinued. In conclusion, reevaluation of GH status may also be undertaken while patients are still on treatment as well as at completion of treatment, especially in patients with idiopathic, partial and isolated GHD, by retesting and by IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements. Lowering the cutoff level of GH peak at pharmacological tests to 0.32 pmol/l (7 ng/ml) will lower the number of false positive results in the diagnosis of GHD.     

Circulating somatomedin-C levels and the effect of growth hormone-releasing factor on plasma levels of growth hormone and somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in obese children

The effect of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) 1-44 on growth hormone and somatostatin release in plasma has been studied in 20 obese children. Twenty age and sex-matched children with normal weight served as controls. Mean peak growth hormone response in obese children after 1 g/kg body wt. GRF 1-44 was significantly lower than in controls (23.7±3.6 ng/ml vs. 41.1±3.0 ng/ml;P<0.01), as were mean integrated growth hormone response areas (1544±272 ng×ml^-1×2 h vs. 2476±283 ng×ml^-1×2 h;P<0.01). Mean plasma levels of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity did not change after GRF in both goups. Mean somatomedin-C levels in obese children were significantly higher compared to controls (1.6±0.4 U/ml vs. 0.86±0.4 U/ml;P<0.01). Somatomedin-C levels were not related to the integrated growth hormone responses. In conclusion there is no relation between somatomedin-C levels and the reduced growth hormone-releasing effect of GRF in obese children. GRF does not alter peripheral somatostatin-like immunoreactivity levels either in normal or obese children.Abbreviations Sm-C somatomedin C - GRF growth hormone-releasing factor - GH growth hormone - SLI somatostatin-like immunoreactivity     

Evaluation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein-3 generation test in short stature

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) based on GH tests and basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels may be difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of pharmacological GH tests, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation test and height velocity off-treatment in the evaluation of GHD and ISS. METHODS: Thirty-three (17 M, 16 F) prepubertal short (height SDS < -2) children were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 19) with peak GH level <10 tg/l (GHD) and Group 2 (n = 14) GH > or =10 microg/l in two sex steroid primed pharmacological GH tests. Having excluded other diagnoses, Group 2 was regarded as having ISS. The generation test was performed concomitantly (0.1 IU/kg GH s.c. for 4 days) with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measured on the 4th day in both groups. The patients were followed for a year for height velocity (HV). RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 had comparable height SDS (-2.3 +/- 0.4 and -2.3 +/- 0.3) at comparable ages (7.8 +/- 2.8 and 7.0 +/- 2.7 yr). Although the deltaIGF-I response was low (<2.0 nmol/l 115 ng/ ml]) in seven (37%) children in the GHD group, all GHD patients with low height velocity had adequate (> or =14 nmol/I [400 ng/ml]) deltaIGFBP-3 response. deltaIGFBP-3 in the generation test showed a negative correlation with HV (p = 0.021, r = -0.570) and also with basal IGFBP-3 (p <0.001, r = -0.743) in the GHD group. In the ISS group, deltaIGF-I and deltaIGFBP-3 responses were low in 31% and 7%, respectively, and the correlation between basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and HV and between delta values in the generation test were significantly positive, pointing to a difference in the growth response of these children. CONCLUSION: In the GHD group, based on pharmacological tests, an adequate deltaIGFBP-3 response in the generation test predicts poor height velocity at follow up and thus strengthens the diagnosis of true GHD.