GADD153在甲状腺滤泡样肿瘤中的表达及与CK19、Galectin-3和HBME-1的对比研究

目的 探讨GADD153在甲状腺滤泡样肿瘤中的表达及其鉴别诊断价值,并与CK19、Galectin-3(简称Gal-3)和HBME-1进行对比.方法 应用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测了34例甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤、46例甲状腺滤泡性癌及29例甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌中GADD153、CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1的表达情况.结果 (1)GADD153的表达位于细胞核,在甲状腺滤泡性癌中的表达大多为中度阳性或强阳性,在滤泡性腺瘤和滤泡型乳头状癌中的表达多为阴性或弱阳性,阳性表达率分别为82.6％( 38/46)、32.4％( 11/34)、10.3％ (3/29),滤泡性癌明显高于滤泡性腺瘤和滤泡型乳头状癌,差异均有统计学意义(x2值分别为20.80和37.48;均P＜0.01).(2)CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1 三种标志物均表达于细胞质,其阳性表达率在滤泡性癌为54.3％( 25/46)、67.4％ (31/46)、58.7％( 27/46),在滤泡性腺瘤为50.0％( 17/34)、29.4％( 10/34)、32.4％( 11/34),在滤泡型乳头状癌为100％( 29/29)、93.1％ (27/29)、89.7％ (26/29),滤泡型乳头状癌与滤泡性腺瘤、滤泡性癌间比较,差异亦均有统计学意义(x2值分别为21.20和8.22;均P＜0.01).(3)根据CK19、Gal-3、HBME-1和GADD153四种标志物表达的强弱分为低表达组(记为0和1+)和高表达组(记为2+和3+),分别计算其在各组的敏感性和特异性.滤泡性腺瘤组敏感性分别为26.5％、8.8％、2.9％和11.8％,特异性为50.7％、52.0％、54.7％和58.7％;滤泡性癌组敏感性分别为19.6％、26.1％、23.9％和65.2％,特异性为41.3％、57.1％、62.0％和92.1％;滤泡型乳头状癌组敏感性分别为96.6％、82.8％、79.3％和3.4％,特异性为77.5％、81.3％、85.0％和57.5％.结论 GADD153对甲状腺滤泡性癌诊断的敏感性和特异性均较好,而CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1则能更好地提示甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌.四者联合应用能更好地鉴别甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤.     

甲状腺乳头状癌中CK19、Galectin-3、HBME-1和TPO的表达及意义

目的 探讨CK19、Galectin-3、HBME-1和TPO在甲状腺良恶性病变中的表达及联合应用在甲状腺乳头状癌鉴别诊断中的价值.方法 采用免疫组化EnVision法检测68例甲状腺乳头状癌、31例甲状腺腺瘤、19例结节性甲状腺肿和15例桥本甲状腺炎中CK19、Galectin-3、HBME-1和TPO的表达.结果 在甲状腺乳头状癌中CK19、Galectin-3和HBME-1的阳性表达率分别为98.5%、98.5%、80.9%,TPO的阴性表达率为89.7%;在甲状腺良性病变中CK19、Galectin-3和HBME-1阳性表达率分别是24.6%、21.5%、1.5%,TPO的阴性表达率是1.5%.CK19、Galectin-3、HBME-1和TPO在甲状腺乳头状癌与良性病变中的表达差异有显著性(P<0.001).联合应用四种抗体在鉴别甲状腺乳头状癌与良性病变时的敏感性、特异性、准确度分别为95.6%、98.5%、97%.结论 CK19、Galectin-3、HBME-1和TPO是诊断甲状腺乳头状癌的重要标志物.联合应用四种抗体在甲状腺乳头状癌与良性病变的鉴别诊断中具有重要价值.     

Twist基因蛋白表达在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断与鉴别诊断中的意义

目的探讨Twist基因蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌中的表达状况,寻找更特异的标记物,用于甲状腺乳头状癌（PTC）与滤泡状腺瘤（FA）和良性乳头病变（BPL）的鉴别诊断。方法以50例PTC为研究组,以48例FA和47例BPL作对照组。在自制组织芯片上行免疫组织化学（SP法）标记,检测Twist基因蛋白和HBME-1,并以CK19进行对照。结果3种指标（Twist、HBME-1、CK19）阳性表达率：在PTC组分别为100％（48／48）、94．0％（47／50）和78．0％（39／50）;在FA组分别为0、6．7％（3／45）和0;在BPL组分别为7．0％（3／43）、2．1％（1／47）和0。PTC组分别与FA和BPL组比较差异均有统计学意义（P=0．000）。3种指标在鉴别诊断甲状腺良、恶性病变的灵敏度分别为：100％、96．4％和97．7％,特异度分别为：94．0％、95．7％和95．1％,准确度分别为：78．0％、100％和91．9％。结论Twist可应用于辅助诊断PTC,并可应用在对FA或BPL的鉴别诊断。     

CK19、CK20在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用价值

目的：探讨甲状腺癌中CK19、CK20蛋白的表达，提高甲状腺的诊断与鉴别诊断水平。方法：应用免疫组化染色对70例甲状腺癌（15例经典型乳头状癌、34例滤泡型乳头状癌、3例Warthin乳头状癌、2例透明细胞型乳头状癌、例柱状细胞型乳头癌、15例滤泡性癌），10例甲状腺腺瘤、10例结节性甲状腺肿和5例标本甲状腺炎中CK19、CK20的表达进行观察。结果:CK19在甲状腺疾病中的表达：55例乳头状癌中，53例为中、强阳性，2例为弱阳性；15例滤泡性癌中，13例为阴性、弱阳性，2例为中、强阳性，两者之间差异存在显著性（P＜0．05）。各癌旁滤泡、10例滤泡性腺瘤、10例结节性甲状腺肿的滤泡、5例桥本甲状腺炎也主要为阴性、弱阳性，个别为中等阳性。对CK20的表达，各型甲状腺乳头状癌、滤泡性癌、癌旁滤泡及滤泡状癌和乳头状增生、多灶性分布的甲状腺泡型乳头状癌和各种滤泡性病变有帮助，可提高甲状腺良恶性病变诊断的准确率及鉴别诊断水平。CK20对鉴别诊断的帮助不大。     

Galectin-3、CK19和TPO表达在甲状腺良恶性肿瘤病理诊断中的价值

目的比较甲状腺病变中galectin-3、CK19和甲状腺过氧化物酶（thyroid peroxidase,TPO）蛋白表达的差异,寻找有助于诊断良恶性肿瘤的标志物。方法采用免疫组化EnVision二步法检测134例甲状腺癌（123例乳头状癌、11例滤泡癌）、34例甲状腺腺瘤、20例结节性甲状腺肿和10例桥本甲状腺炎中galectin-3、CK19和TPO蛋白的表达。结果Galectin-3、CK19和TPO在甲状腺乳头状癌（包括主要的3个亚型）与良性病变中的表达差异有显著性（P〈0．01）,在乳头状癌各亚型间和各良性病变之间的表达差异均无显著性（P〉0．05）。滤泡癌和良性病变中galectin-3表达差异有显著性（P〈0．01）。滤泡癌和腺瘤中CK19、TPO的表达差异有显著性（P〈0．05,P〈0．01）。结论甲状腺恶性肿瘤特别是乳头状癌中galectin-3和CK19的表达有增高,而TPO表达缺失。3种蛋白分别是诊断甲状腺肿瘤特别是乳头状癌的有用标志物,联合使用结果更可靠。     

甲状腺微小乳头状癌中Galectin-3、CK19、HBME-1和CD56的表达及意义

目的探讨结节性甲状腺肿合并甲状腺微小乳头状癌中Galectin-3、CK19、HBME-1及CD56的表达及意义。方法采用免疫组化SP法检测10例结节性甲状腺肿合并甲状腺微小乳头状癌中Galectin-3、CK19、HBME-1和CD56的表达水平。结果 Galectin-3、CK19和HBME-1在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中均呈中至强阳性表达,而在结节性甲状腺肿中主要呈阴性或弱阳性表达。然而在10例甲状腺微小乳头状癌中有8例CD56的表达均为阴性,2例呈轻度阳性着色;周围结节性甲状腺肿组织9例均呈中至强阳性表达,仅1例呈轻度阳性着色。结论 Galectin-3、CK19、HBME-1及CD56联合检测将进一步提高甲状腺微小乳头状癌的准确性。     

甲状腺乳头状癌RET、CK19、TG、Ki-67的表达

目的 研究甲状腺乳头状癌RET、CK19、TG、Ki-67蛋白表达特点及其临床意义。方法 应用免疫组织化学SP法检测RET、CK19、TG、Ki-67蛋白在30例甲状腺乳头状癌、10例结节性甲状腺肿和18例癌旁正常甲状腺中的表达。结果 RET、CK19在乳头状癌的阳性率（66．7％、83．3％）明显高于结节性甲状腺肿和正常甲状腺阳性率（7．1％、25．0％）,两者差异有显著性（P〈0．01）。乳头状癌组及良性病例组TG表达阳性率差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。96．7％的乳头状癌Ki-67阳性细胞数小于10％。结论 RET及CK19在甲状腺乳头状癌表达增加,具有一定的病理诊断价值。     

甲状腺乳头状癌诊断与鉴别的可靠标记物

目的寻找更好的标记物，用于甲状腺乳头状癌的诊断与鉴别。方法以甲状腺乳头状癌（PTC）为研究组，以甲状腺滤泡状腺瘤（FA）和良性乳头状病变（BPL）作对照组。经自制组织芯片和免疫组化技术，对Twist、Galectin-3、HBME-1、p14^ARF和TPO进行标记，并与CK19对比实验。结果6种指标阳性表达率依次为：PTC组100．0％、95、6％、80．0％、28．9％、15．6％和78．0％：FA组0．0、11．1％、6．7％、75．6％、88．9％和0．0；BPL组7．0％、7．5％、2．5％、77．5％、100．0％和0．0。PTC组与FA和BPL组比较差异均有显著性（P〈0．05）。6种指标的灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为100.0％、95．6％、80．0％、71．1％、84．4％、78．0；96．g％、90．1％、95．3％、76．5％、94．1％、100．0％和97．7％、92．3％、90．0％、74．6％、90．8％、91．9％。结论在PTC中6种指标阳性表达率最高的为Twist，其次为Galectin-3，因此临床病理工作中标记Twist和Galectin-3鉴别PTC与FA或BPL有实用意义。Twist的灵敏度和准确度最高，CK19特异度最高。因此该2种指标联合使用对于PTC的鉴别诊断最可靠。     

细胞角蛋白和Ret蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌中的表达

目的　探讨甲状腺乳头状癌中细胞角蛋白 (CK)和ret的表达及其在病理诊断中的价值。方法　分别采用免疫组织化学EnVision法及LSAB法检测CK19、CK17、CK8、CK2 0及ret在 6 9例甲状腺乳头状癌、14例结节性甲状腺肿和 4 2例癌旁正常滤泡中的表达。结果　CK19、ret在乳头状癌组织的阳性率 (85 5 %、6 8 1% )明显高于结节性甲状腺肿和正常滤泡组织阳性率 (2 5 0 %、5 4 % ) ,二者差异有统计学意义 (P <0 0 1)。CK17在乳头状癌中有少量表达 (15 9% ) ,主要集中在鳞化及分化差或小灶浸润区域。分别有 75 4 %及 2 6 8%的乳头状癌及良性区域CK8染色阳性 ,所有病例CK2 0阴性。结论　CK19、CK17及ret在甲状腺乳头状癌中表达增加 ,在病理诊断中有一定价值。     

p53, ki-67, galectin-3, HBME-1, 34βE12和CK19在甲状腺乳头状癌中的表达及临床病理意义

 摘要：目的：探讨p53, ki-67, galectin-3, HBME-1, 34βE12和CK-19在甲状腺乳头状癌中的表达及临床病理意义。方法：采用免疫组化检测43例甲状腺乳头状癌、37例结节性甲状腺肿、33例甲状腺腺瘤和17例桥本甲状腺炎中p53, ki-67, galectin-3, HBME-1, 34βE12和CK-19的表达。结果：p53, ki-67, galectin-3, HBME-1, 34βE12和CK-19在甲状腺乳头状癌中的阳性表达例数分别为88.37%、79.07%、88.37%、93.02%、86.05%、95.35%;6种蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌与结节性甲状腺肿、甲状腺腺瘤和桥本甲状腺炎中的阳性表达率相比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论：联合检测p53, ki-67, galectin-3, HBME-1, 34βE12和CK-19在甲状腺乳头状癌与良性病变的诊断和鉴别诊断中具有重要的价值。     

Usefulness of HBME-1, cytokeratin 19 and galectin-3 immunostaining in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy

Aims : To investigate the usefulness of immunohistochemical expression and immunolocalization of a panel of thyroid malignancy markers including HBME-1, cytokeratin (CK) 19 and galectin-3.
Methods and results : We evaluated 170 thyroid lesions including 148 neoplastic lesions [84 papillary carcinomas (PC), 38 follicular carcinomas (FC), 18 follicular adenomas, one hyalinizing trabecular tumour, five medullary carcinomas, two anaplastic carcinomas] and 22 non-neoplastic lesions (12 adenomatous nodules and 10 Hashimoto's thyroiditis). HBME-1, galectin-3 and CK19 were expressed in 94%, 72.6%, 72.6% of PCs and in 63%, 21%, 21% of FCs. The three markers were mostly negative in all normal tissues. Although the most helpful marker in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the follicular variant of PC and for FC diagnosis was HBME-1, when we consider the differentiation between cases of follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC) and FC or adenoma, in terms of percentage of positive cells, galectin-3 and CK19 were more relevant.
Conclusions : HBME-1 is the most sensitive marker for thyroid malignancy but the three markers may be useful in specific cases. This panel of markers is useful to differentiate the follicular patterned lesions, with special reference to the FVPC.     

Immunohistochemical diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

In thyroid, the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma (PC) is based on nuclear features; however, identification of these features is inconsistent and controversial. Proposed markers of PC include HBME-1, specific cytokeratins (CK) such as CK19, and ret, the latter reflecting a ret/PTC rearrangement. We applied immunohistochemical stains to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these three markers. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 232 surgically resected thyroid nodules included 40 hyperplastic nodules (NH), 35 follicular adenomas (FA), 138 papillary carcinomas (PC; 54 classical papillary tumors and 84 follicular variant papillary carcinomas [FVPC]), 4 follicular carcinomas (FC), 6 insular carcinomas (IC), 7 Hürthle cell carcinomas (HCC), and 2 anaplastic carcinomas (AC). HBME-1 and ret were negative in all NH and FA; some of these exhibited focal CK19 reactivity in areas of degeneration. Half of the FC and AC exhibited HBME-1 staining but no positivity for CK19 or ret. In PC, 20% of cases stained for all three markers. Classical PC had the highest positivity with staining for HBME-1 in 70%, CK19 in 80%, and ret in 78%. FVPC were positive for HBME-1 in 45%, for CK19 in 57%, and for ret in 63%; only 7 FVPC were negative for all three markers. The six IC exhibited 67% staining for HBME-1 and 50% positivity for CK19 and ret. The seven HCC had 29% positivity for HBME-1 and CK19, and 57% positivity for ret. This panel of three immunohistochemical markers provides a useful means of diagnosing PC. Focal CK19 staining may be found in benign lesions, but diffuse positivity is characteristic of PC. HBME-1 positivity indicates malignancy but not papillary differentiation. Only rarely are all three markers negative in PC; this panel therefore provides an objective and reproducible tool for the analysis of difficult thyroid nodules.     

Immunohistochemical expression of HBME-1 and galectin-3 in the differential diagnosis of follicular-derived thyroid nodules

BackgroundThyroid nodules are common among adults with only a small percentage being malignant and histologically mimic benign nodules. Accurate diagnosis of these thyroid nodules is critical for the proper clinical management. The determination of malignancy in follicular patterned thyroid lesions is based on postoperative histological findings. Therefore, affected patients are referred for surgery, although only 10% will have a final diagnosis of malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of two immunohistochemical (IHC) markers; galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) individually or in combination, to distinguish between benign (non-neoplastic and neoplastic) and malignant (follicular and papillary carcinomas) thyroid lesions removed by surgical resection.MethodsWe investigated the immunoexpression of galectin-3 and HBME-1 in 50 cases of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The benign group included 13 cases of thyroid nodular goiter (NG) and 9 cases of follicular adenoma (FA). The malignant group included 5 cases of follicular thyroid carcinomas (FC), 18 cases of classic papillary thyroid carcinoma and 5 cases of follicular variant papillary carcinoma (FVPC).ResultsThe staining results showed that malignant tumors expressed galectin-3 and HBME-1 significantly more than benign nodules. The sensitivity of these markers for the distinction between benign and malignant lesions ranged from 89.3% to 92.9%. Co-expression of galectin-3 and HBME-1 was seen in 82.1% of carcinomas, but in none of the benign nodules. Immunoexpression was usually diffuse in malignant tumors, and focal in the benign lesions.ConclusionOur findings indicate that these immunohistochemical markers are significantly more expressed in malignant tumors compared to benign lesions and may be of additional diagnostic value when combined with routine histology. Galectin-3 has higher sensitivity and specificity of immunoexpression in thyroid malignancy than HBME-1, and the combined use of galectin-3 and HBME-1 can increase the specificity of immunoexpression in malignant tumors.     

Diagnostic value of galectin-3, HBME-1, cytokeratin 19, high molecular weight cytokeratin, cyclin D1 and p27(kip1) in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules

The distinction between benign and malignant thyroid tumors is critical for the management of patients with thyroid nodules. We applied immunohistochemical staining for galectin-3, HBME-1, cytokeratin 19 (CK19), high molecular weight cytokeratin (HMWCK), cyclin D1 and p27(kip1) in 295 thyroid lesions to determine their diagnostic accuracy. The expression of all markers was significantly associated with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).The sensitivity for the diagnosis of DTC was 94.7% with galectin-3, 91.3% with HBME-1, and 90.3% with CK19. The specificities of these markers were 95.5%, 69.7%, and 83.1%, respectively. Combining these markers, co-expression of galectin-3 and CK19 or galectin-3 and HBME-1 was seen in 93.2% of carcinomas but in none of the benign nodules. Comparing follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC) with follicular carcinoma (FC), the expression of galectin-3, CK19, and HMWCK was significantly higher in FVPC. When comparing FC with FA, the expression of galectin-3 and HBME-1 was significantly higher in FC. These results suggest that 1) galectin-3 is a useful marker in the distinction between benign and malignant thyroid tumors, 2) the combined use of HBME-1 and CK19 can increase the diagnostic accuracy, and 3) the use of CK19 and HMWCK can aid in the differential diagnosis between PC and FC.     

The use of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of thyroid gland tumors with follicular growth pattern

The aim of the study was to evaluate the expression of galectin-3 (gal3), cytokeratin 19 (CK19), neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and E-cadherin (Ecad) in thyroid gland tumors with follicular growth pattern with particular focus on their use in differential diagnosis. A series of 139 cases - 87 follicular adenomas (FAs), 26 follicular carcinomas (FCs), and 26 cases of the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC) was studied. Expression of gal3 was found in 29/87 (33%) of FAs, in 13/26 (50%) of FCs, and in 24/26 (92%) of FVPCs. Expression of CK19 was found in 11/87 (13%) of FAs, in 4/26 (15%) of FCs, and in 17/26 (65%) of FVPCs. Expression of NCAM was found in 60/87 (69%) of FAs, in 20/26 (77%) of FCs, and in 7/26 (27%) FVPCs. Expression of Ecad was found in 81/87 (93%) of FAs, in 22/26 (85%) of FCs, and in 17/26 (65%) of FVPCs. The sensitivity and specificity of gal3 for malignancy were 0.70 and 0.85, of CK19 0.48 and 0.98, of NCAM 0.28 and 0.47, and of Ecad 0.48 and 0.20, respectively. A significant difference (p < 0.05) in expression of all studied markers between FVPC versus FA and FC was found, in contrast to FA and FC. Therefore, the use of gal3 and CK19 in differential diagnosis of FVPC versus FA and FC can be recommended.     

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression in follicular-patterned thyroid lesions. Caveats for the use of immunohistochemical studies

To determine its usefulness as a specific diagnostic marker for follicular carcinomas (FCs) vs other follicular-patterned thyroid lesions and possible application to fine-needle aspiration specimens, we immunohistochemically studied peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) expression in histologic sections (FC, 13 cases; follicular adenoma [FA], 11; follicular variant of papillary carcinoma [FVPC], 9) and surrounding thyroid tissue by using a PPAR gamma monoclonal antibody. Positivity (detected by nuclear staining) was scored as absent, weak, moderate, or strong. When only moderate or strong nuclear staining was considered positive, 9 FCs (69%), 3 FAs (27%), and 2 FVPCs (22%) demonstrated positive nuclear immunoreactivity. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical detection of PPAR gamma expression in FCs were 69% and 75%, respectively. In nonlesional surrounding tissue, moderate to strong positive staining was seen in focal areas of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis in 6 of 33 cases (FC, 2; FA, 3; FVPC, 1); diffuse moderate staining was detected in surrounding tissue in the absence of lymphocytic thyroiditis in 4 cases (12%; FC, 3; FA, 1). Staining in the follicular-patterned lesions and surrounding nonlesional thyroid was specific with peptide blocking experiments. PPAR gamma expression is not a specific marker for FCs, and its detection in nonlesional thyroid tissue suggests limited usefulness as a diagnostic marker for follicular-patterned lesions in general.     

HBME-1 immunostaining in thyroid pathology

The aim of this study was to evaluate wether HBME-1 immunohistochemical analysis can reliably differentiate benign thyroid lesions from thyroid carcinomas. Fifty benign and 87 malignant lesions were analyzed. All papillary carcinomas (67/67) were HBME-1 positive, as well as 14 of 20 follicular well-differentiated carcinomas and 13 of 29 atypical follicular adenomas and 4 out of 21 goiters were weakly and focally positive. HBME-1 highlighted micronests of papillary carcinomas. The reactivity of HBME-1 in the tall-cell variant of papillary carcinomas was apical and stronger than in classical papillary carcinomas. Positive HBME-1 immunostaining is in support of the diagnosis of the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma and highlights micropapillary carcinomas. HBME-1 may be of additional value in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy.     

Immune characterization of thyroid neoplasm's and its variants using immunohistochemical markers: CK-19, Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1

BackgroundNodular lesions of the thyroid are amongst the common palpable lesions that are encountered by the pathologists in the fine needle aspiration clinics and not only aspiration smears, but even biopsy sections pose significant challenges in their characterization and further classification. Neoplastic lesions of the thyroid have shown a steady rise worldwide and are diagnosed at age younger than most other cancers. Histopathology remains the gold standard in diagnosis and classification of thyroid neoplasms, with variable sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers, also attributed to variation in the inclusion criteria. We classified the thyroid neoplasms based on WHO Classification (2017) and aimed to study the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical markers - CK-19, Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 performed on manual tissue microarray sections to differentiate various variants of papillary carcinoma from its mimickers, specifically follicular patterned papillary neoplasms from other follicular patterned lesions.MethodProspective study of neoplastic lesions of thyroid from July 2018 to August 2020. Authors describe the clinico-radiological, cytological, histo-morphological and immunohistochemical features of neoplastic nodular lesions of the thyroid.ResultsProspective analysis of nodular thyroid lesions yielded 76 cases, of which 38 were neoplastic. Cytology showed discordance in 10/24 cases, amongst the discordant cases, 70% were confirmed as papillary carcinoma. CK-19 showed high expression in all variants of papillary carcinomas (24/24), low expression in well differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential (WD-TUMP) and medullary carcinoma. It was negative in follicular and Hurthle cell neoplasms. Galectin-3 showed 100% specificity and HBME-1 showed 100% sensitivity in diagnosis of papillary carcinoma and its variants. Adenomatoid nodules did not express Gal-3 which helped in their differentiation from FVPTC.ConclusionsGal-3 in combination either with CK-19 or HBME-1 improves the sensitivity and specificity of detection of papillary carcinoma, its variants and its differentiation from follicular patterned lesions to 100% with a significant p value.