Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and violence: a review of the available evidence

OBJECTIVE: To provide a clinically useful analysis of the relationship between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), in particular fluoxetine and violent or suicidal behaviour. METHOD: All published papers on Medline and other databases linking serotonin, SSRIs and aggression were reviewed. RESULTS: A small proportion of patients treated with SSRIs may become akathisic and others may show increases in anxiety in the initial phase of treatment, but no increased susceptibility to aggression or suicidality can be connected with fluoxetine or any other SSRI. In fact SSRI treatment may reduce aggression, probably due to positive effects on the serotonergic dysfunction that is implicated in aggressive behaviour directed towards oneself or others. CONCLUSION: In the absence of convincing evidence to link SSRIs causally to violence and suicide, the recent lay media reports are potentially dangerous, unnecessarily increasing the concerns of depressed patients who are prescribed antidepressants.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and Alzheimer's disease

Given the failure to develop disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease(AD),strategies aiming at preventing or delaying the onset of the disease are being prioritized.While the debate regarding whether depression is an etiological risk factor or a prodrome of AD rages on,a key determining factor may be the timing of depression onset in older adults.There is increasing evidence that untreated early-onset depression is a risk factor and that late-onset depression may be a catalyst of cognitive decline.Data from animal studies have shown a beneficial impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on pathophysiological biomarkers of AD including amyloid burden,tau deposits and neurogenesis.In humans,studies focusing on subjects with a prior history of depression also showed a delay in the onset of AD in those treated with most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.Paroxetine,which has strong anticholinergic properties,was associated with increased mortality and mixed effects on amyloid and tau deposits in mice,as well as increased odds of developing AD in humans.Although most of the data regarding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is promising,findings should be interpreted cautiously because of notable methodological heterogeneity between studies.There is thus a need to conduct large scale randomized controlled trials with long follow up periods to clarify the dose-effect relationship of specific serotonergic antidepressants on AD prevention.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for children and adolescents

The controlled studies of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pediatric psychopharmacology research lag behind the controlled studies of SSRIs in adults. As a result, widespread use of SSRIs in the treatment of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders is in stark contrast to the paucity of research data. Recent changes in the research climate (including support from the National Institute of Mental Health, the Food and Drug Administration, and industry) have encouraged welldesigned SSRI studies in pediatric psychopharmacology, and will ultimately provide needed information to guide treatment. This paper reviews the best available data from pediatric SSRI trials, including 10 double-blind placebo-controlled trials, and two abstracts of open-label continuation studies of SSRIs associated with large pediatric efficacy studies. Adverse events (AEs) of SSRIs in children and adolescents are discussed in reference to available pediatric studies. Recent pharmacokinetic studies of SSRIs in children and adolescents are reviewed. Future SSRI research strategies are also discussed.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction in adolescents: a review

OBJECTIVE: To review the existing literature on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-induced sexual dysfunction in adolescents. METHOD: A literature review of SSRI-induced adverse effects in adolescents focusing on sexual dysfunction was done. Nonsexual SSRI-induced adverse effects were compared in adult and pediatric populations. Information regarding SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction was extracted from pediatric SSRI clinical trials, clinical reviews, treatment guidelines, case reports, and MedWatch reports. RESULTS: Although the incidences of nonsexual SSRI-induced adverse effects seemed to be similar for both adult and pediatric populations, only one male of 1,346 pediatric subjects receiving an SSRI reported sexual dysfunction. Approximately one third of the clinical reviews and treatment guidelines reviewed raised some concern about SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. In 11 years, only eight MedWatch reports regarding SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction in adolescents have been filed. Only one letter to the editor describing impaired sexual functioning in three of five adolescents on SSRIs could be found. CONCLUSIONS: Information on SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction in adolescents is lacking. Researchers and clinicians may be failing to ask adolescents about sex and sexual functioning in the context of SSRI treatment.     

A review of the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic illness associated with substantial morbidity; it often requires long-term medication. The best-studied therapeutic agent in the treatment of this disorder is the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine. Since other tricyclic antidepressants appear to lack efficacy in OCD, that of clomipramine has been linked to its potent effects on serotonin. Consequently, agents that selectively inhibit serotonin reuptake have been the focus of several large-scale, placebo-controlled studies of OCD. Their efficacy in OCD is the focus of our review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search (1966 to present) of OCD treatment with clomipramine or SSRI antidepressant medication using the key words obsessive-compulsive disorder, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine, and pharmacology. STUDY FINDINGS: The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine have, in separate multicenter trials, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of OCD. In contrast, clomipramine, though efficacious, is often associated with substantial adverse events, particularly anticholinergic side effects. While 2 recent meta-analyses support the superior efficacy of clomipramine over selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of OCD, 5 of 6 head-to-head comparisons of either fluoxetine or fluvoxamine versus clomipramine have found similar efficacy but a lower incidence of side effects with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. A recently completed multicenter, 12-week, double-blind trial of paroxetine versus clomipramine versus placebo showed paroxetine to be as effective as clomipramine. With significantly fewer dropouts due to adverse effects than clomipramine, paroxetine was also associated with superior tolerability. CONCLUSION: The suggestion that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors possess efficacy similar to that of clomipramine, but have a superior side effect profile, may have important implications for patients with OCD who require long-term treatment.     

Cerebrovascular effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: An understanding of cerebro-vascular effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is essential, since SSRIs are a widely used antidepressant, serotonin is a vasoactive and thrombostatic amine, and there is a bidirectional relationship between depression and cerebrovascular disease. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify published reports over the period of 1966 through 2003, using the terms SSRIs and antidepressants matched with the terms platelets, coagulation, anticoagulation, bleeding, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, embolism, cerebral ischemia, stroke, cerebrovascular accident, acute and chronic cerebrovascular disease, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebrovascular disorder, and cerebral circulation. Adverse event reports collected from the World Health Organization (WHO), manufacturers, and the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR) were also examined. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two case-control studies failed to show an association between SSRI use and intracranial hemorrhage, and of these, 1 showed no association with ischemic stroke. Sixteen studies of SSRI treatment in poststroke patients found no significant cerebrovascular adverse reactions. The WHO data have shown several hundred cases of SSRI-associated cerebrovascular disease, but definitive causal relationships remain undetermined. Four cases of vasoconstrictive stroke related to drug interactions between SSRIs and other serotonergic drugs have been reported. PDR and manufacturer reference sources categorized cerebrovascular reaction as an infrequent or rare adverse event related to SSRI use. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that SSRI treatment has a very low rate of cerebrovascular adverse reaction. Pharmacovigilance is required in the use of SSRIs in high-risk populations for bleeding and vasoconstrictive stroke. More research is warranted to examine the variability of pharmacologic and genetic factors, depressive illness, and stroke on the antiplatelet and vasospastic effects of SSRIs and their significance to cerebrovascular protection or adverse reactions.     

Controversy revisited: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in paediatric depression.

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently controversial treatments for paediatric depression. There have been several publications on the subject during recent years. This article summarizes their findings and provides some original thoughts, suggestions, and perspectives. METHODS: Important and relevant articles presenting original data and published in leading journals during 2003-2005 were identified through a PubMed search. Articles instructive in content were selected. A narrative sequence is used to review the field, build arguments, and propound views. RESULTS: Ten principal and several other auxiliary studies were identified for scrutiny. The findings of these studies suggest that published clinical trials of SSRIs in paediatric depression have overstated the antidepressant benefits and understated the risks of suicidal ideation and behaviour arising with treatment; the unpublished clinical trial data are even more unfavourable. Nevertheless, the clinical, epidemiological, and forensic data do suggest overall safety and efficacy of the SSRIs, amongst which fluoxetine may have the best risk-benefit profile. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotherapeutic interventions may not always be feasible or effective, especially when depression is more severe. The failure to prescribe a drug may, at the very least, lead to the loss of the placebo effect. It is therefore suggested that, if the diagnosis of unipolar depression is confident, appropriate doses of fluoxetine may be prescribed to depressed children and adolescents; the use of rescue medication to treat emergent agitation is important, and augmentation with psychotherapy may further improve outcomes. The monitoring of indices of growth may also be necessary.     

Bursts and the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

We present a new hypothesis for the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). We propose that SSRIs bring the response to the phasic firing of raphe nucleus cells back to normal, even though the average extracellular 5HT concentration remains low. We discuss burst firing in the raphe nuclei and use mathematical models to argue that tonic firing and phasic firing may be decoupled and may come from different mechanisms. We use a mathematical model for serotonin synthesis, release, and reuptake in terminals to illustrate the responses in terminal regions to bursts in a normal individual and in an individual with low vesicular serotonin. We then show that acute doses of SSRIs do not bring the response to bursts back to normal, but that chronic doses do return the response to normal. These model results need to be confirmed by new electrophysiological and pharmacological experiments.     

The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in autism and related disorders

This paper reviews the published literature on the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of symptoms associated with autistic disorder and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in both children and adults. To date, placebocontrolled studies of SSRIs have involved only fluvoxamine (in children and adults) and fluoxetine (in children). Open-label and retrospective studies of all other SSRIs in PDDs have also been published that suggest effectiveness. Despite these positive reports, there continues to be questions about the tolerability and appropriate dosing of SSRIs in children with PDDs. Because of the limited number of placebo-controlled studies, definitive conclusions about the role SSRIs should play in the clinical treatment of children with PDDs cannot be drawn. Larger, placebo-controlled studies of SSRIs are needed to guide clinical treatment.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and periodic limb movements of sleep

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors may induce periodic limb movements of sleep in adults. We undertook a retrospective review of polysomnography data of 1,023 children acquired at our institution over 1 year to assess whether children receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors have a higher risk of periodic limb movements of sleep than children that are not treated with these medications. Periodic limb movements of sleep were found in 13 (31.7%) of 41 children receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors and in 77 (7.8%) of 982 children not receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors (odds ratio 5.45). Furthermore, the median periodic limb movement index in patients receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors was significantly higher than patients not receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors (11.2 and 6.5 respectively; P < 0.05). Children receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors are at risk of periodic limb movements of sleep. Appropriate clinical judgment and medical management may result in better control of periodic limb movements of sleep and improved quality of life in these patients.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

TOPIC: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) has reentered the spotlight following the FDA's recent approval of fluoxetine hydrochloride to treat its symptoms. Although the diagnosis and treatment of PMDD has long been a source of contention, the FDA move has heightened the debate over this diagnostic category and the most appropriate treatment. PURPOSE: To explore several diagnoses related to PMDD and review recent research findings pertaining to the effectiveness of SSRIs to treat PMDD. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Published literature. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced practice nurses need to remain well informed about premenstrual conditions and emerging evidence-based treatment alternatives. In particular, they need to remember that the FDA has approved fluoxetine for the treatment of a very small subset of women with premenstrual complaints, among whom treatment efficacy is limited.     

An effect-size analysis of the relative efficacy and tolerability of serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors for panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are now considered the first-line pharmacotherapy for panic disorder. The preferential use and the presumption of greater tolerability of SSRIs relative to older agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants, occurred without direct comparisons between the two classes of medication. In this study the authors used an effect-size analysis to provide an initial comparison. METHOD: The authors conducted an effect-size analysis of 12 placebo-controlled, efficacy trials of SSRIs for panic disorder and compared these results to findings obtained in a recent meta-analysis of non-SSRI treatments for panic disorder. RESULTS: The mean effect size for acute treatment outcome for SSRIs relative to placebo was 0.55, not significantly different from that for antidepressants in general (0.55) and for imipramine in particular (0.48). More recent studies of SSRIs, and studies using larger samples, were associated with lower effect sizes. No significant differences were found in dropout rates between those taking SSRIs and those taking older agents during acute treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An effect-size analysis of controlled studies of treatments for panic disorder revealed no significant differences between SSRIs and older antidepressants in terms of efficacy or tolerability in short-term trials. An inverse relationship was evident between sample size and effect size for SSRIs. Early studies of small samples may have led to initial overestimations of the efficacy of SSRIs for panic disorder.