Reamed intramedullary nailing versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for shaft fracture of femur: a systematic literature review

Introduction  

Fractures of femoral fracture are among the most common fractures encountered in orthopedic practice. Intramedullary nailing is the treatment choice for femoral shaft fractures in adults. The objective of this article is to determine the effects of reamed intramedullary nailing versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for fracture of femoral shaft in adults.     

Systematic review shows lowered risk of nonunion after reamed nailing in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures

Nonunion after intramedullary nailing (IMN) in patients with tibial shaft fractures occurs up to 16%. There is no agreement whether reaming prior to IMN insertion would reduce the nonunion rate. We aimed to compare the nonunion rate between reamed and unreamed IMN in patients with tibial shaft fractures.A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The selected publications were: (1) randomised controlled trials; (2) comparing the nonunion rate; (3) in patients with tibial shaft fractures; (4) treated with either reamed or unreamed IMN.Seven studies that satisfied the criteria were identified. They showed that reamed IMN led to reduction of nonunion rate compared to unreamed IMN in closed tibial shaft fractures (risk difference ranging 7.0-20%, number needed to treat ranging 5-14), while the difference between compared treatments for open tibial shaft fractures was not clinically relevant.The evidence showed a consistent trend of reduced nonunion rate in closed tibial shaft fracture treated with reamed compared to unreamed IMN.     

Marknagelung geschlossener Unterschenkelschaftbrüche

Intramedullary nailing is the operative method of first choice for closed fractures of the tibial shaft. In general, the method is well taught and has proven its worth in many clinics. If attention is paid to the technical recommendations very good results can be obtained with both the reamed and the unreamed technique. In German-speaking areas unreamed locked nailing with solid nails is preferred; in the Anglo-American world the reamed technique is more widely accepted. After-treatment aims at achieving early functional recovery. The favorable biomechanical conditions for load transfer associated with osteosynthesis mean that weight-bearing is possible early, even while the soft tissue situation is still settling down and the fracture healing. Provided there are no complications or malalignments, closed intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures is one of the most gratifying operative procedures permitting early functional rehabilitation.     

Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior and deep posterior compartment pressures during reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of displaced, closed tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: University Hospital/Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight adults with forty-nine fractures treated with intramedullary nailing within three days of injury. INTERVENTION: After intraoperative placement of compartment pressure monitors, the tibia fractures were treated by either unreamed intramedullary nailing or reamed intramedullary nailing. A fracture table and skeletal traction were not used in any of these procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Compartment pressures and deltaP ([diastolic blood pressure] - [compartment pressure]) were measured immediately preoperatively, intraoperatively, and for twenty-four hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Compartment syndrome did not occur in any patient. Peak average pressures were obtained during reaming in the reamed group (30.0 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 34.7 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment) and during nail insertion in the unreamed group (33.9 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 35.2 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment). The average pressures quickly returned to less than thirty millimeters of mercury and remained there for the duration of the study. The deep posterior compartment pressures were lower in the reamed group than in the unreamed group at ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty, twenty-two, and twenty-four hours postoperatively (p < 0.05 at each of these times. A statistically significant difference between anterior compartment pressures could not be shown with the numbers available. The deltaP values were greater than thirty millimeters of mercury at all times after nail insertion in both the reamed and unreamed groups. CONCLUSION: These data support acute (within three days of injury) reamed intramedullary nailing of closed, displaced tibial shaft fractures without the use of a fracture table.     

An economic analysis of management strategies for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures

Background?Closed and open grade I (low-energy) tibial shaft fractures are a common and costly event, and the optimal management for such injuries remains uncertain.

Methods?We explored costs associated with treatment of low-energy tibial fractures with either casting, casting with therapeutic ultrasound, or intramedullary nailing (with and without reaming) by use of a decision tree.

Results?From a governmental perspective, the mean associated costs were USD 3,400 for operative management by reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 5,000 for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 5,000 for casting, and USD 5,300 for casting with therapeutic ultrasound. With respect to the financial burden to society, the mean associated costs were USD 12,500 for reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 13,300 for casting with therapeutic ultrasound, USD 15,600 for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, and USD 17,300 for casting alone.

Interpretation?Our analysis suggests that, from an economic standpoint, reamed intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures. Considering financial burden to society, there is preliminary evidence that treatment of low-energy tibial fractures with therapeutic ultrasound and casting may also be an economically sound intervention.     

Safe surgical technique: intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures

Statically locked, reamed intramedullary nailing remains the standard treatment for displaced tibial shaft fractures. Establishing an appropriate starting point is a crucial part of the surgical procedure. Recently, suprapatellar nailing in the semi-extended position has been suggested as a safe and effective surgical technique. Numerous reduction techiques are available to achieve an anatomic fracture alignment and the treating surgeon should be familiar with these maneuvers. Open reduction techniques should be considered if anatomic fracture alignment cannot be achieved by closed means. Favorable union rates above 90 % can be achieved by both reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. Despite favorable union rates, patients continue to have functional long-term impairments. In particular, anterior knee pain remains a common complaint following intramedullary tibial nailing. Malrotation remains a commonly reported complication after tibial nailing. The effect of postoperative tibial malalignment on the clinical and radiographic outcome requires further investigation.     

Reamed versus Non-Reamed Tibial Intramedullary Nailing

Abstract Background: While most surgeons agree that intramedullary nails are the implant of choice in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures, the decision to ream the intramedullary canal prior to nail insertion remains controversial. We therefore conducted an international survey of practicing orthopedic surgeons with an interest in fracture care (1) to identify surgeons beliefs regarding the risks of infection and nonunion with intramedullary reaming, and (2) to identify factors associated with surgeons beliefs. Material and Methods: We utilized focus groups, key informants and sampling to redundancy strategies to develop a survey to examine surgeons preferences in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. We mailed this survey to members of the Orthopedic Trauma Association, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, and European trauma centers affiliated with AO International. Results: Of the 577 surgeons surveyed, 444 (77%) responded. Of the respondents, 60% had an academic practice, 84% supervised residents, and 65.1% had fellowship training in trauma. Surgeons, in general, believed reamed nails decreased the risk of nonunion and had no effect on infection risk in closed tibial shaft fractures; however, surgeons, on average, believed that there was no difference in reducing the risk of nonunion or infection in patients with open tibial shaft fractures. Surgeons aged > 50 years, those with past trauma fellowship training, and those practicing in North America were more likely to believe reamed intramedullary nailing reduced nonunion rates. Conclusion: The continued disagreement and controversy reflect the lack of definitive evidence regarding the relative merits of the two approaches, and indicate that more studies are needed to resolve this issue.     

Prospective randomized study of reamed versus unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing: an assessment of procedures

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the procedure of unreamed femoral nailing is simpler, faster, and safer than reamed femoral intramedullary nailing. DESIGN: Prospective randomized. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred femoral shaft fractures without significant concomitant injuries admitted to an academic Level 1 urban trauma center. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture using a reamed or unreamed technique. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The surgical time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: One hundred patients with 100 femoral shaft fractures were correctly prospectively randomized to the study. Thirty-seven patients received reamed and sixty-three patients received unreamed nails. All nails were interlocked proximally and distally. The average surgical time for the reamed nail group was 138 minutes and for unreamed nail group was 108 minutes (p = 0.012). The estimated blood loss for the reamed nail group was 278 milliliters and for the unreamed nail group 186 milliliters (p = 0.034). Reamed intramedullary nailing required an average of 4.72 minutes, whereas unreamed nailing required 4.29 minutes of fluoroscopy time. Seven perioperative complications occurred in the reamed nail group and eighteen in the unreamed nail group. Two patients in the unreamed group required an early secondary procedure. Iatrogenic comminution of the fracture site occurred during three reamed and six unreamed intramedullary nailings. Reaming of the canal was required before the successful placement of three nails in the unreamed group because of canal/nail diameter mismatch. CONCLUSIONS: Unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing involves fewer steps and is significantly faster with less intraoperative blood loss than reamed intramedullary nailing. The unreamed technique, however, was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5).     

Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results and complications of the various modalities for treating closed fractures of the tibial shaft described in the prospective literature. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1966 to 1999 was conducted using the MeSH heading "tibial fractures." Studies pertaining to the management of closed tibial shaft fractures were reviewed, and their reference lists were searched for additional articles. STUDY SELECTION: An analysis of the relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials was performed. Studies including confounding data on open fractures or fractures in children were excluded. The 13 remaining studies were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Raw data were extracted and pooled for each method of treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 13 studies described 895 tibial shaft fractures treated by application of a plaster cast, fixation with plate and screws, and reamed or unreamed intramedullary nailing. Although definitions varied, the combined incidence of delayed and nonunion was lower with operative treatment (2.6% with plate fixation, 8.0% with reamed nailing and 16.7% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (17.2%). The incidence of malunion was similarly lower with operative treatment (0% with plate fixation, 3.2% with reamed nailing and 11.8% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (31.7%). Superficial infection was most common with plate fixation (9.0%) compared with 2.9% for reamed nailing, 0.5% for unreamed nailing and 0% for closed treatment. The incidence of osteomyelitis was similar for all groups. Rates of reoperation ranged from 4.7% to 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: All forms of treatment for tibial shaft fractures are associated with complications. A knowledge of the incidence of each complication facilitates the consent process. To fully resolve the controversy as to the best method of treatment, a large, randomized, controlled trial is required. This review more precisely predicts the expected incidence of complications, allowing the numbers of required patients to be more accurately determined for future randomized controlled studies.     

The diaphyseal aseptic tibial nonunions after failed previous treatment options managed with the reamed intramedullary locking nail

BackgroundThe nonunion of open and closed tibial shaft fractures continues to be a common complication of fractures. Tibial nonunions constitute the majority of long bone nonunions seen by orthopaedic surgeons. In this article, we present our approach to the surgical treatment of noninfected tibial shaft nonunions.MethodsBetween 2008 and 2014, 33 patients with aseptic diaphyseal tibial nonunion was treated by reamed intramedullary nailing and were retrospectively reviewed. The initial fracture management consisted of external fixation (27 patients), plate fixation (2 patients) and cast treatment (4 patients). All patients, preoperatively, were evaluated for the signs of the infection, by the same protocol. There were 13 hypertrophic, 16 oligotrophic (atrophic) and 4 defect nonunions registered in our material. The primary goal was to perform a closed intramedullary nailing on antegrade manner. An open procedure was only unavoidable when implants had to be removed or an osteotomy had to be performed to improve the alignment. Functional rehabilitation was encouraged with the assistance of a physiotherapist early postoperative. Patients were examined regularly during followed-up for a minimum of 12 months period for clinical and radiological signs of union, infection, malunion, malalignment, limb shortening, and implant failure.ResultsThe time that elapsed from injury to intramedullary nailing ranged from 9 months to 48 months (mean 17 months).Open intramedullary nailing was unavoidable in 25 cases (75,75%), while closed nailing was performed in 8 patients (24,25%). Osteotomy or resection of the fibula was performed in 78,8% of the cases. All patients were followed up in average period of 2 years postoperative (range 1–4 years), and 31(93,9%) patients achieved a solid union within the first 8 months. Mean union time was 5±0.8 months. Complications included 2 (6,06%) patients, one with deep infection and another case with absence of bone healing. Anatomical alignment has been achieved in the majority of patients, 28 patients (84,8%). The additionally autogenous bone chips were added in 4 patients (12,1%) where cortical defect was greater than 50% of the bone circumference.ConclusionIn conclusion, a reamed intramedullary nail provides optimal conditions for stable fixation, good rotational control, adequate alignment, early weight-bearing and a high union rate of tibial non-unions. Reaming of the medullary canal with preservation of periosteal sleeve create the "breeding ground" for sound healing of tibial shaft nonunions. Additionally cancellous bone grafting is recommended only in the case of defect nonunion.     

Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years' follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To determine if any differences exist in healing and complications between reamed and unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients with displaced closed and open Gustilo type I-IIIA fractures of the central two thirds of the tibia. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of tibial fractures either with a slotted, stainless steel reamed nail or a solid, titanium unreamed nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunions, time to fracture healing, and rate of malunions. RESULTS: The average time to fracture healing was 16.7 weeks in the reamed group and 25.7 weeks in the unreamed group. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.004). There were three nonunions, all in the unreamed nail group. Two of these fractures healed after dynamization by removing static interlocking screws. The third nonunion did not heal despite exchange reamed nailing 2 years after the primary surgery and dynamization with a fibular osteotomy after an additional 1 year. There were two malunions in the reamed group and four malunions in the unreamed group. There were no differences for all other outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: Unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures may be associated with higher rates of secondary operations and malunions compared with reamed nailing. The time to fracture healing was significantly longer with unreamed nails.     

Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials

The choice between reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures is an ongoing controversy. We carried out a comprehensive search strategy. Six eligible randomised controlled trials were included. Three reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted outcome data. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.0. The results showed lower risks of tibial fracture nonunion and implant failures with reamed nails compared to unreamed nails in closed tibial fractures [relative risk (RR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21–0.89, P = 0.008 for nonunion and RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.22–0.56, P < 0.0001 for implant failures], but no statistical differences in risk reduction of malunion, compartment syndrome, embolism and infection. Our results suggested no statistical differences in risk reduction of all the complications evaluated between reamed and unreamed nails in open tibial fractures. In conclusion, our study recommended reamed nails for the treatment of closed tibial fractures. But the choice for open tibial fractures remains uncertain.     

Exchange reamed nailing for aseptic nonunion of the tibia

BACKGROUND: Exchange reamed nailing of the tibia is a common procedure in the treatment of an aseptic tibial nonunion. However, reports in the literature supporting this technique are limited. METHODS: Forty patients with a tibial nonunion after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing were retrospectively assessed after an exchange reamed nailing. The main outcome measurements included radiographic and clinical union as well as time from exchange reamed nailing to union. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients achieved union of their fracture (95%). The average time from exchange nailing to union was 29 +/- 21 weeks. Complications included one deep vein thrombosis (2.5%) and two hardware failures (5%). CONCLUSION: Exchange reamed nailing for nonunions of the tibia results in a high union rate and is associated with a low complication rate. This technique is recommended as a standard procedure for aseptic tibial nonunions after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing.     

Intramedullary pressure and bone marrow fat extravasation in reamed and unreamed femoral nailing.

This study was designed to investigate whether intramedullary pressure and embolization of bone marrow fat are different in unreamed compared with conventional reamed femoral nailing in vivo. In a baboon model, the femoral shaft was stabilized with interlocking nailing after a midshaft osteotomy. Intramedullary pressure was measured in the distal femoral shaft fragment at the supracondylar region. Extravasation of bone marrow fat was determined by the modified Gurd test (range: 0-5) with blood samples from the vena cava inferior. Data were monitored in eight unreamed and eight reamed intramedullary femoral nailing procedures. Intramedullary pressure increased in the unreamed group to 76 +/- 25 mm Hg (10.1 +/- 3.3 kPa) during insertion of 7-mm nails and in the reamed group to 879 +/- 44 mm Hg (117.2 +/- 5.9 kPa) during reaming of the medullary cavity. Insertion of 9-mm nails after the medullary cavity had been reamed to 10 mm produced an intramedullary pressure of 254 +/- 94 mm Hg (33.9 +/- 12.5 kPa) (p < 0.05). Fat extravasation in the unreamed group was recorded with a score of 2.9 +/- 0.4 for the Gurd test during nailing with 7-mm nails, whereas in the reamed group significantly more fat extravasation was noticed during the reaming procedures, with a score of 4.6 +/- 0.1. Liberation of fat during insertion of 9-mm nails after reaming was recorded with a score of 3.5 +/- 0.4. In both groups, a positive correlation of fat extravasation with the rise in intramedullary pressure was found (reamed group: r(s) = 0.868; unreamed group: r(s) = 0.698), resulting in significantly less liberation of bone marrow fat in the unreamed stabilized group than in the reamed control group (p < 0.05). The data indicate that fat embolization during nailing procedures after femoral osteotomy increases with increasing intramedullary pressure and occurs in a lesser degree in unreamed than in reamed intramedullary femoral shaft stabilization.     

Smoking,Obesity, and Disability Benefits or Litigation Are Not Associated with Clinically Important Reductions in Physical Functioning After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundForty percent of long bone fractures involve the tibia. These fractures are associated with prolonged recovery and may adversely affect patients’ long-term physical functioning; however, there is limited evidence to inform what factors influence functional recovery in this patient population.Question/purposeIn a secondary analysis of a previous randomized trial, we asked: What fracture-related, demographic, social, or rehabilitative factors were associated with physical function 1 year after reamed intramedullary nailing of open or closed tibial shaft fractures?MethodsThis is a secondary (retrospective) analysis of a prior randomized trial (Trial to Re-evaluate Ultrasound in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures; TRUST trial). In the TRUST trial, 501 patients with unilateral open or closed tibial shaft fractures were randomized to self-administer daily low-intensity pulsed ultrasound or use a sham device, of which 15% (73 of 501) were not followed for 1 year due to early study termination as a result of futility (no difference between active and sham interventions). Of the remaining patients, 70% (299 of 428) provided full data. All fractures were fixed using reamed (298 of 299) or unreamed (1 of 299) intramedullary nailing. Thus, we excluded the sole fracture fixed using unreamed intramedullary nailing. The co-primary study outcomes of the TRUST trial were time to radiographic healing and SF-36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) scores at 1-year. SF-36 PCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores being better, and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is 5 points. In this secondary analysis, based on clinical and biological rationale, we selected factors that may be associated with physical functioning as measured by SF-36 PCS scores. All selected factors were inserted simultaneously into a multivariate linear regression analysis.ResultsAfter adjusting for potentially confounding factors, such as age, gender, and injury severity, we found that no factor showed an association that exceeded the MCID for physical functioning 1 year after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures. The independent variables associated with lower physical functioning were current smoking status (mean difference -3.0 [95% confidence interval -5 to -0.5]; p = 0.02), BMI > 30 kg/m² (mean difference -3.0 [95% CI -5.0 to -0.3]; p = 0.03), and receipt of disability benefits or involvement in litigation, or plans to be (mean difference -3.0 [95% CI -5.0 to -1]; p = 0.007). Patients who were employed (mean difference 4.6 [95% CI 2.0 to 7]; p < 0.001) and those who were advised by their surgeon to partially or fully bear weight postoperatively (mean difference 2.0 [95% CI 0.1 to 4.0]; p = 0.04) were associated with higher physical functioning. Age, gender, fracture severity, and receipt of early physical therapy were not associated with physical functioning at 1-year following surgical fixation.ConclusionAmong patients with tibial fractures, none of the factors we analyzed, including smoking status, receipt of disability benefits or involvement in litigation, or BMI, showed an association with physical functioning that exceeded the MCID.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.     

Acute unreamed intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with muscle flaps for the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures

BACKGROUND: The treatment of open tibial shaft fractures remains controversial. Important considerations in surgical management include surgical timing, fixation technique and soft tissue coverage. This study was performed to evaluate the results of acute surgical debridement, unreamed nailing and soft tissue reconstruction in the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 10-year period between January 1993 and July 2002, 927 tibial shaft fractures were treated with interlocking intramedullary nails. Among them, there were 19 consecutive patients with Gustilo type IIIB to IIIC open tibial shaft fractures with extensive soft tissue injury needing a muscle flap coverage and being suitable for intramedullary nailing. All 19 patients were called for a late follow-up which was conducted with a physical examination and a radiographic and functional outcome assessment. The radiographs were reviewed to determine the fracture healing time and the final alignment. RESULTS: All 19 open fractures with severe soft tissue injury healed without any infection complications. The fractures united in a mean of 8 months. Nine patients had delayed fracture healing (union time over 24 weeks). One of these patients needed exchange nailing, one patient autogenous bone grafting and dynamisation on the nail and seven patients needed dynamisation of the nail before the final fracture healing. In all patients, the alignment was well maintained. However, seven patients had shortening of the tibia by 1-2 cm and two of them also external rotation of 10 degrees . The functional outcome was good in 18/19 patients. INTERPRETATION: Acute surgical debridement, unreamed interlocking intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with a muscle flap appear to be a safe and effective method of treatment for Gustilo type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures.     

扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉固定治疗胫骨闭合性骨折的系统评价

[目的]系统评价扩髓髓内钉(reamed intramedullary nailing,RTN)与非扩髓髓内钉(unreamed intr-amedullary nailing,UTN)治疗胫骨闭合性骨折的疗效。[方法]通过计算机检索、手工检索和其他检索方法,收集RTN与UTN治疗胫骨闭合性骨折的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT)和半随机对照试验(quasi-ran-domized controlled trials,CCT),按Cochrane协作网推荐的方法进行系统评价。[结果]共纳入6个RCT研究,总病例数为1214例。Meta分析显示:(1)RTN组的骨折不愈合率低于UTN组,差异有统计学意义(RR=0.41;95%CI(0.21,0.78),P=0.007);(2)RTN组的内置物失败率低于UTN组,差异有统计学意义(RR=0.32;95%CI(0.20,0.50),P<0.000 1);(3)RTN组与UTN组术后畸形愈合率及感染率差异无统计学意义,两者相对危险度分别为0.45(95%CI(0.16,1.22),P=0.12)、0.45(95%CI(0...     

Provisional plating of Type III open tibia fractures prior to intramedullary nailing

Intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures is the preferred treatment of most displaced, unstable tibial shaft fractures. In open tibia fractures, direct exposure of the fracture segments for irrigation and debridement is required prior to fracture stabilization. We propose a method of provisional stabilization using commonly available implants placed through the associated traumatic open wound prior to intramedullary nailing. This technique, particularly helpful to surgeons operating with limited assistance, employs a temporarily applied 3.5-mm dynamic compression plate or limited contact dynamic compression plate implant secured with unicortical screws, allowing reaming and intramedullary nailing of a reduced, stabilized tibia fracture.     

Similar central hemodynamics but increased postoperative oxygen consumption in unreamed versus reamed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing intramedullary nailing of long bone fractures have pathologically altered pulmonary vascular tone, right heart strain, and transient impairment of pulmonary gas exchange. The purpose of this study was to examine the acute differences in cardiopulmonary variables between reamed and unreamed nailing techniques in 18 (9 + 9) healthy patients with unilateral femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: Intramedullary nailing was performed under general anesthesia within 12 hours after the trauma. For blood sampling, recording, and measurements, the patients were cannulated with radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters. Changes in central hemodynamics and oxygenation were studied pre-, peri-, and postoperatively for 16 to 20 hours. RESULTS: Abnormally high pulmonary shunting (23 +/- 12% in the reamed and 27 +/- 11% in the unreamed group) was observed before the operation. The trends of all variables were very similar in both groups except for the last phase in which the mixed venous oxygen saturation tended to be lower (65 +/- 8 vs. 70 +/- 5%) and the oxygen consumption index was higher (186 +/- 21 vs. 151 +/- 20 mL/min/m) in the unreamed group than in the reamed group (p < 0.05). The timepoints most strenuous to the heart were at the end of operation and in the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS: The unreamed intramedullary nailing technique does not offer any advantage in cardiopulmonary variables over the reamed technique. In both groups, there was considerable deviation in over 10 cardiopulmonary variables from normal reference values during the study. We suggest the use of invasive monitoring on patients with a long bone fracture and poor preoperative oxygenation or a history of cardiopulmonary or cardiac disease.     

An economic analysis of management strategies for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures

Background Closed and open grade I (low-energy) tibial shaft fractures are a common and costly event, and the optimal management for such injuries remains uncertain.

Methods We explored costs associated with treatment of low-energy tibial fractures with either casting, casting with therapeutic ultrasound, or intramedullary nailing (with and without reaming) by use of a decision tree.

Results From a governmental perspective, the mean associated costs were USD 3,400 for operative management by reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 5,000 for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 5,000 for casting, and USD 5,300 for casting with therapeutic ultrasound. With respect to the financial burden to society, the mean associated costs were USD 12,500 for reamed intramedullary nailing, USD 13,300 for casting with therapeutic ultrasound, USD 15,600 for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, and USD 17,300 for casting alone.

Interpretation Our analysis suggests that, from an economic standpoint, reamed intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures. Considering financial burden to society, there is preliminary evidence that treatment of low-energy tibial fractures with therapeutic ultrasound and casting may also be an economically sound intervention.