Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of loratadine with concomitant administration of ketoconazole or cimetidine

AIMS: To evaluate whether ketoconazole or cimetidine alter the pharmacokinetics of loratadine, or its major metabolite, desloratadine (DCL), or alter the effects of loratadine or DCL on electrocardiographic repolarization in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: Two randomized, evaluator-blind, multiple-dose, three-way crossover drug interaction studies were performed. In each study, subjects received three 10 day treatments in random sequence, separated by a 14 day washout period. The treatments were loratadine alone, cimetidine or ketoconazole alone, or loratadine plus cimetidine or ketoconazole. The primary study endpoint was the difference in mean QTc intervals from baseline to day 10. In addition, plasma concentrations of loratadine, DCL, and ketoconazole or cimetidine were obtained on day 10. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of loratadine and ketoconazole significantly increased the loratadine plasma concentrations (307%; 90% CI 205-428%) and DCL concentrations (73%; 62-85%) compared with administration of loratadine alone. Concomitant administration of loratadine and cimetidine significantly increased the loratadine plasma concentrations (103% increase; 70-142%) but not DCL concentrations (6% increase; 1-11%) compared with administration of loratadine alone. Cimetidine or ketoconazole plasma concentrations were unaffected by coadministration with loratadine. Despite increased concentrations of loratadine and DCL, there were no statistically significant differences for the primary electrocardiographic repolarization parameter (QTc) among any of the treatment groups. No other clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of loratadine were observed as assessed by electrocardiographic parameters (mean (90% CI) QTc changes: loratadine vs loratadine + ketoconazole = 3.6 ms (-2.2, 9.4); loratadine vs loratadine + cimetidine = 3.2 ms (-1.6, 7.9)), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Loratadine 10 mg daily was devoid of any effects on electrocardiographic parameters when coadministered for 10 days with therapeutic doses of ketoconazole or cimetidine in healthy volunteers. It is concluded that, although there was a significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ketoconazole or cimetidine and loratadine, this effect was not accompanied by a change in the QTc interval in healthy adult volunteers.     

Interaction trial between artemether-lumefantrine (Riamet) and quinine in healthy subjects

Forty-two healthy Caucasian subjects were randomized in a double-blind, parallel three-group study (14 subjects per group) to investigate potential electrocardiographic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the antimalarials artemether-lumefantrine (six-dose regimen of Riamet over 3 days) and quinine (2-h intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg body weight, not exceeding 600 mg in total, 2 h after the last dose of Riamet). The study medications were all safe and well tolerated after all treatments. Neither the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine nor the pharmacokinetics of quinine was influenced by the presence of the other drug. Plasma levels of artemether and dihydroartemisinin appeared to be lower following the combined treatment Riamet + quinine, but this was not considered to be clinically relevant. Riamet alone had no effect on QTc interval. Infusion of quinine alone caused a transient prolongation of QTc interval, which was consistent with the known cardiotoxicity of quinine, with this effect being slightly but significantly greater when quinine was infused after Riamet. It would thus appear that the inherent risk of QTc prolongation of IV quinine was enhanced by prior administration of Riamet. However, these occasional QTc prolongations, which were small in magnitude and not correlated with plasma concentrations of any of the compounds, were not considered to be of clinical importance. In conclusion, overlapping therapy with artemether-lumefantrine and IV quinine in the treatment of patients with complicated or multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria may result in a modest increased risk of QTc prolongation, but this is far outweighed by the potential therapeutic benefit.     

Co-administration of ketoconazole with H1-antagonists ebastine and loratadine in healthy subjects: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects

AIMS: Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of coadministration of ketoconazole with two nonsedating antihistamines, ebastine and loratadine, on the QTc interval and on the pharmacokinetics of the antihistamines. METHODS: In both studies healthy male subjects (55 in one study and 62 in the other) were assigned to receive 5 days of antihistamine (ebastine 20 mg qd in one study, and loratadine 10 mg qd in the other) or placebo alone using a predetermined randomization schedule, followed by 8 days of concomitant ketoconazole 450 mg qd/antihistamine or ketoconazole 400 mg qd/placebo. Serial ECGs and blood sampling for drug analysis were performed at baseline and on study days 5 (at the end of monotherapy) and 13 (at the end of combination therapy). QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using the formula QTc = QT/RR(alpha) with special emphasis on individualized alpha values derived from each subject's own QT/RR relationship at baseline. RESULTS: No significant changes in QTc interval from baseline were observed after 5 days administration of ebastine, loratadine or placebo. Ketoconazole/placebo increased the mean QTc (95% CI) by 6.96 (3.31-10.62) ms in the ebastine study and by 7.52 (4.15-10.89) ms in the loratadine study. Mean QTc was statistically significantly increased during both ebastine/ketoconazole administration (12.21 ms; 7.39-17.03 ms) and loratadine/ketoconazole administration (10.68 ms; 6.15-15.21 ms) but these changes were not statistically significantly different from the increases seen with placebo/ketoconazole (6.96 ms; 3.31-10.62 ms), P = 0.08 ebastine study, (7.52 ms; 4.15-10.89 ms), P = 0.26 loratadine study). After the addition of ketoconazole, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for ebastine increased by 42.5 fold, and that of its metabolite carebastine by 1.4 fold. The mean AUC for loratadine increased by 4.5 fold and that of its metabolite desloratadine by 1.9 fold following administration of ketoconazole. No subjects were withdrawn because of ECG changes or drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ketoconazole altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of both ebastine and loratadine although the effect was greater for the former drug. The coadministration of ebastine with ketoconazole resulted in a non significant mean increase of 5.25 ms (-0.65 to 11.15 ms) over ketoconazole with placebo (6.96 ms) while ketoconazole plus loratadine resulted in a nonsignificant mean increase of 3.16 ms (-2.73 to 8.68 ms) over ketoconazole plus placebo (7.52 ms). Changes in uncorrected QT intervals for both antihistamines were not statistically different from those observed with ketoconazole alone. The greater effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of ebastine was not accompanied by a correspondingly greater pharmacodynamic effect on cardiac repolarization.     

Pharmacokinetics of oral neratinib during co-administration of ketoconazole in healthy subjects

AIM

The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of neratinib, a potent, low-molecular-weight, orally administered, irreversible pan-ErbB (ErbB-1, -2, -4) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, during co-administration with ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor.

METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized, two-period, crossover study. Fasting healthy adults received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg alone and with multiple oral doses of ketoconazole 400 mg. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after each neratinib dose. Plasma concentration data were analyzed using a noncompartmental method. The least square geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval (CI)] of C_max(neratinib+ketoconazole) : C_max(neratinib alone), and AUC(neratinib+ketoconazole) : AUC(neratinib alone) were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects were enrolled. Compared with neratinib administered alone, co-administration of ketoconazole increased neratinib C_max by 3.2-fold (90% CI: 2.4, 4.3) and AUC by 4.8-fold (3.6, 6.5). Median t_max was 6.0 h with both regimens. Ketoconazole decreased mean apparent oral clearance of neratinib from 346 l h⁻¹ to 87.1 l h⁻¹ and increased mean elimination half-life from 11.7 h to 18.0 h. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two regimens (50% neratinib alone, 65% co-administration with ketoconazole).

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of neratinib with ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, increased neratinib C_max by 3.2-fold and AUC by 4.8-fold compared with administration of neratinib alone. These results indicate that neratinib is a substrate of CYP3A and is susceptible to interaction with potent CYP3A inhibitors and, thus, dose adjustments may be needed if neratinib is administered with such compounds.     

索他洛尔的药动学及其血药浓度与QTc延长的关系

目的为研究国产索他洛尔的药动学及其QTc延长与血药浓度之间的关系.方法6名健康志愿者口服国产索他洛尔单剂160mg后分别于0,0.5,1.5,2,3,3.5,4,6,8,12,24,36h抽血及行心电图检查.采用反相高效液相色谱-荧光检测法检测血清中索他洛尔的浓度,根据QTc=QT/RR1/2得到相应的QTc值.结果国产索他洛尔片剂AUC,Cmax,Tmax,T1/2β分别为(17.3±2.3)μg*ml-1*h,(1.27±0.21)μg*ml-1,(2.3±0.6)h,(11.3±1.1)h.索他洛尔产生的QTc延长与血药浓度成线性相关,并可见最大QTc延长滞后于血药浓度.结论国产索他洛尔在国人体内的药动学参数与西方人相近,索他洛尔产生的QTc延长与血药浓度成线性相关,最大QTc延长滞后于血药浓度.     

The effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol trifenatate in healthy subjects

Aim

To investigate the effects of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone furoate (FF) and vilanterol trifenatate (VI).

Methods

Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects. In study 1, subjects received single doses of ketoconazole (400 mg) or placebo on days 1–6, with a single dose of inhaled VI (25 μg) on day 5. Pharmacodynamic and PK data were obtained up to 48 h following the VI dose. In study 2, subjects received once daily ketoconazole (400 mg) or placebo for 11 days, with FF/VI (200/25 μg) for the final 7 days. Pharmacodynamic and PK data were obtained up to 48 h following the day 11 dose.

Results

In study 1, there was no effect of co-administration of ketoconazole and VI on pharmacodynamic or PK parameters. In study 2, co-administration of ketoconazole and FF/VI had no effect on 0–4 h maximal heart rate or minimal blood potassium {treatment difference [90% confidence interval (CI)] –0.6 beats min^–1 (−5.8, 4.5) and 0.04 mmol l⁻¹ (−0.03, 0.11), respectively}, whilst there was a 27% decrease in 24 h weighted mean serum cortisol [treatment ratio (90% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.86)]. Co-administration of ketoconazole increased [percentage change (90% CI)] FF area under the curve (0-24) and maximal plasma concentration by 36% (16, 59) and 33% (12, 58), respectively, and VI area under the curve (0–t′) and maximal plasma concentration by 65% (38, 97) and 22% (8, 38), respectively.

Conclusion

Co-administration of FF/VI or VI with ketoconazole resulted in a less than twofold increase in systemic exposure to FF and VI. There was no increase in β-agonist systemic pharmacodynamic effects, while serum cortisol was decreased by 27%. Co-administration of FF/VI with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors has the potential to increase systemic exposure to both fluticasone furoate and vilanterol, which could lead to an increase in the potential for adverse reactions.     

Influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

AIM: To assess the influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A two-period randomized crossover study was conducted in healthy male and female subjects (19-45 years). Placebo or 200 mg ketoconazole were administered orally every 24 h for 29 days. On day 8, a single oral dose of 125 mg azimilide dihydrochloride was coadministered following an overnight fast. Blood samples were obtained prior to and for 22 days following azimilide dihydrochloride administration. The plasma protein binding of azimilide was also assessed at 6 h after dosing. RESULTS: Following ketoconazole administration, a 16% increase in azimilide AUC (90% confidence interval (CI) 112%, 120%), a 12% increase in C(max) (95% CI 107%, 116%), a 13% increase in t(1/2,z) (95% CI 107%, 120%) and a 14% decrease in CL(o) (95% CI 82%, 90%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in azimilide pharmacokinetics following ketoconazole treatment are not clinically important since the 90% CI for the AUC fell within the prespecified range of 80-125%. Thus, no clinically important drug interactions are expected when azimilide dihydrochloride is coadministered with CYP3A4 inhibitors.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of avitriptan during intravenous administration in healthy subjects.

Avitriptan, a selective 5-HT1-like receptor agonist, is an effective compound for the treatment of migraine headaches with a prolonged duration of response. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, ascending-dose study in 24 healthy subjects was designed to assess the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of avitriptan. This antimigraine drug was administered as two consecutive constant-rate IV infusions at three dose levels (12.7, 25.3, and 38.0 mg), which were targeted to produce plasma concentrations in and above the therapeutic range. The best fitting of the plasma concentration-time data was obtained by using a triexponential function yielding a terminal t1/2 of 8 hours. The areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves were proportional to dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. Moreover, the clearance and steady-state volume of distribution values were independent of the dose. The change in pulse rate and supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure was determined as pharmacodynamic effects of avitriptan. A "threshold log-linear" model, which accounts for the linear increase in pharmacodynamic effect with the log of plasma concentrations when the latter was higher than a certain threshold value, adequately described the pharmacodynamic data. The threshold plasma drug concentrations for the pulse rate and the diastolic and systolic blood pressure were 14, 74, and 161 ng/ml, respectively. Overall, avitriptan has consistent, linear pharmacokinetics and increases systolic and diastolic blood pressure in a predictable manner at a higher plasma concentration. However, this drug does not produce a significant change in pulse rate at the dose levels (12.7-38 mg) evaluated in this study.     

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of udenafil in healthy Korean subjects

AIMS

Udenafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It is metabolized to DA-8164, a major metabolite, by CYP3A4. This study was performed to investigate the effect of ketoconazole, a known CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of udenafil.

METHODS

An open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence crossover study was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. They received a single 100-mg oral dose of udenafil. Following a 5-day interval, 400 mg of ketoconazole was administered once a day for three consecutive days. On day 3 of ketoconazole treatment, a second 100 mg of udenafil was dosed concomitantly. Blood samples were collected at time points up to 48 h without ketoconazole treatment and up to 72 h with ketoconazole co-administration. The plasma concentration of udenafil was determined using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Following ketoconazole co-administration, the mean C_max and AUC_last of udenafil (95% confidence interval) increased 1.9-fold (1.60, 2.27) and 3.2-fold (2.82, 3.63), respectively. The median time to reach the C_max was delayed in the co-administrated treatment, while the mean terminal elimination half-life (t_1/2) remained relatively unchanged regardless of ketoconazole co-administration. The metabolic AUC ratio (AUC_last of DA-8164/AUC_last of udenafil) was 1.71 when udenafil was administered alone, and the value decreased to 0.19 when udenafil was dosed in the presence of ketoconazole. Regarding safety assessments, no clinically significant difference or serious adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The systemic exposure of udenafil increased significantly when it was administered with ketoconazole. Dose adjustment may be required when these drugs are used together.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ()-sotalol in healthy male volunteers

1 We investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of (±)-sotalol administered orally to healthy male volunteers in single doses of 40, 80 and 160 mg and in multiple doses of 80 mg twice daily for 7 consecutive days.
2 In the single dose studies, the half-life of (-)-sotalol (7.2-8.5 h) was significantly ( P < 0.01) shorter than that of (+)-sotalol (9.1-11.4 h) while the renal clearance of (-)-sotalol (110.6-126.4 ml min^-1) was significantly ( P < 0.01) faster than that of (+)-sotalol (102.2-110.1 ml min^-1). In the multiple dose studies, similar differences in the pharmacokinetics of (+)- and (-)-sotalol were observed. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of both (+)- and (-)-sotalol on day 4 were shown to be essentially the same as those on day 7.
3 In pharmacodynamic examinations, (±)-sotalol prolonged QTc intervals on electrocardiograms dose-dependently after single doses of 80 and 160 mg (3.81 ± 2.96%, 13.23 ± 5.66%). The correlation between the plasma concentration of (±)-sotalol and prolongation of QTc intervals was nearly linear, and showed no hysteresis.
4 In conclusion, we demonstrated that QTc interval was prolonged with a linear correlation to the plasma concentration of (±)-sotalol. In addition, our study suggested that differences in the pharmacokinetics of (+)- and (-)-sotalol may be attributable to faster urinary excretion of (-)-sotalol.     

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in healthy subjects

AIMS: Fungal infection is a significant comorbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus, and ketoconazole, an antifungal agent, causes a number of drug interactions with coadministered drugs. Rosiglitazone is a novel thiazolidinedione antidiabetic drug, mainly metabolized by CYP2C8 and to a lesser extent CYP2C9. We investigated the possible effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in humans. METHODS: Ten healthy Korean male volunteers were treated twice daily for 5 days with 200 mg ketoconazole or with placebo, using a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study. On day 5, a single dose of 8 mg rosiglitazone was administered orally, and plasma rosiglitazone concentrations were measured. RESULTS: Ketoconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve for rosiglitazone by 47%[P = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval (CI) 23, 70] and the mean elimination half-life from 3.55 to 5.50 h (P = 0.0003; 95% CI in difference 1.1, 2.4). The peak plasma concentration of rosiglitazone was increased by ketoconazole treatment by 17% (P = 0.03; 95% CI 5, 29). The apparent oral clearance of rosiglitazone decreased by 28% after ketoconazole treatment (P = 0.0005; 95% CI 18, 38). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that ketoconazole affected the disposition of rosiglitazone in humans, probably by the inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, leading to increasing rosiglitazone concentrations that could increase the efficacy of rosiglitazone or its adverse events.     

Lack of effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in healthy subjects

AIMS: To examine in vivo the effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover, placebo-controlled trial. Healthy male volunteers (n = 14) received ketoconazole 200 mg or placebo twice daily for 7 days, and rosuvastatin 80 mg was coadministered on day 4 of dosing. Plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin, and active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were measured up to 96 h postdose. RESULTS: Following coadministration with ketoconazole, rosuvastatin geometric least square mean AUC(0,t) and Cmax were unchanged compared with placebo (treatment ratios (90% confidence intervals): 1.016 (0.839, 1.230), 0.954 (0.722, 1.260), respectively). Rosuvastatin accounted for essentially all of the circulating active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and most (> 85%) of the total inhibitors. Ketoconazole did not affect the proportion of circulating active or total inhibitors accounted for by circulating rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Ketoconazole did not produce any change in rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. The data suggest that neither cytochrome P450 3A4 nor P-gp-mediated transport contributes to the elimination of rosuvastatin.     

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of imipramine and desipramine in healthy subjects

Aims The aim of the study was to characterize further the role of CYP3A4 in the metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants.
Methods The effect of oral ketoconazole (200  mg day⁻¹ for 14 days) on the kinetics of a single oral dose of imipramine (100  mg) and desipramine (100  mg) was evaluated in two groups of six healthy male subjects.
Results Ketoconazole administration was associated with a decrease in imipramine apparent oral clearance (from 1.16±0.21 to 0.96±0.20  l h⁻¹  kg⁻¹, mean±s.d.; ' of2\P<0.02), a prolongation in imipramine half-life (from 16.7±3.3 to 19.2±5.4  h, ' of2\P<0.05) and a decrease in area under the curve of metabolically derived desipramine (from 3507±1707 to 3180±1505  nmol  l⁻¹  h, P <0.05), whereas concentrations of 2-hydroxy-imipramine were unaffected. In the subjects given desipramine, no significant changes in desipramine and 2-hydroxy-desipramine kinetics were observed during ketoconazole treatment.
Conclusions These findings indicate that ketoconazole, a relatively specific inhibitor of CYP3A4, inhibits the N -demethylation of imipramine without affecting the 2-hydroxylation of imipramine and desipramine. This interaction, confirms that CYP3A4 plays a role in the demethylation of tricyclic antidepressants.     

Single dose pharmacokinetics of oral artemether in healthy Malaysian volunteers

Aims To determine the pharmacokinetics of artemether (ARM) and its principal active metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA) in healthy volunteers.
Methods Six healthy male Malaysian subjects were given a single oral dose of 200  mg artemether. Blood samples were collected to 72  h. Plasma concentrations of the two compounds were measured simultaneously by reversed-phase h.p.l.c. with electrochemical detection in the reductive mode.
Results Mean (± s.d.) maximum concentrations of ARM, 310±153  μg  l⁻¹, were reached 1.88±0.21  h after drug intake. The mean elimination half-life was 2.00±0.59  h, and the mean AUC 671±271  μg  l⁻¹ h. The mean C _max of DHA, 273±64  μg  l⁻¹, was observed at 1.92±0.13  h. The mean AUC of DHA was 753±233  μg  h  l⁻¹. ARM and DHA were stable at ≤−20°  C for at least 4 months in plasma samples.
Conclusions The relatively short half-life of ARM may be one of the factors responsible for the poor radical cure rate of falciparum malaria with regimens employing daily dosing. In view of the rapid loss of DHA in plasma samples held at room temperature (26°  C) it is recommended to store them at a temperature of ≤−20°  C as early as possible after sample collection.     

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoconazole tablets (Onofin-K and Nizoral) in a healthy female Mexican population

A randomized, crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy female volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two brands of ketoconazole (200 mg) tablets; Onofin-K (Farmacéuticos Rayere S.A., Mexico) as the test and Nizoral (Janssen-Cilag, Mexico) as the reference products. The study was performed at the Clinical Pharmacology Research Center of the Hospital General de Mexico in Mexico City. Two tablets (400 mg) were administered as a single dose with 250 ml of water after a 12 h overnight fast on two treatment days separated by a 1 week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 12 h. Plasma harvested was analysed for ketoconazole by a modified and validated HPLC method with UV detection in the range 400-14000 ng/ml, using 200 microl of plasma in a full-run time of 2.5 min. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-alpha), Cmax, Tmax and t(1/2) were determined from plasma concentrations of both formulations and the results discussed. AUC(0-t), AUC(0-alpha) and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log transformation of data, and no significant differences were found either in 90% classic confidence interval or in the Anderson and Hauck test (p < 0.05). Based on statistical analysis, it is concluded that Onofin-K is bioequivalent to Nizoral.     

自制复方酮康唑软膏的药效学和安全性研究

目的 评价自制复方酮康唑软膏的药效学和安全性。方法 采用纸片扩散法,选取6种真菌和2种细菌,考察自制软膏及3种市售制剂对抑菌圈直径的影响。另外,采用单次和多次给药的皮肤刺激性,及皮肤变态反应,评价自制软膏的安全性。结果 自制软膏与含酮康唑的市售制剂类似,均对6种真菌产生了显著的抑菌圈。对铜绿假单胞菌,各制剂均未产生抑菌圈;对金黄色葡萄球菌,自制软膏与市售莫匹罗星软膏的抑菌圈相似,且显著大于其他市售制剂。给予自制软膏后,皮肤刺激反应评分均小于0.5,致敏率为0,组织结构与正常皮肤无差异。结论 自制的复方酮康唑软膏的抑菌性能优于多数市售制剂,且具有良好的皮肤安全性,有望用于皮肤浅部真菌感染的治疗。     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the vasopeptidase inhibitor,omapatrilat in healthy subjects

AIMS: To determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, in healthy subjects. METHODS: The effects of oral omapatrilat were evaluated in healthy men in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trials. In a single-dose study, subjects received omapatrilat in doses of 2.5, 7.5, 25, 50, 125, 250, or 500 mg. In a multiple-dose study, subjects received doses of 10, 25, 50, 75, or 125 mg daily for 10 days. RESULTS: In the multiple-dose study, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax = 10-895 ng ml(-1); tmax = 0.5-2 h) of omapatrilat were attained rapidly. Omapatrilat exhibited a long effective half-life (14-19 h), attaining steady state in 3-4 days. In the single-dose study, Cmax (1-1009 ng ml(-1)) and AUC(0,t) (0.4-1891 ng ml(-1) h) were linear but not dose proportional. In the multiple-dose study, based on weighted least-squares linear regression analyses vs dose, Cmax but not AUC(0,t) was linear at the lower doses on day 10. The lowest dose of omapatrilat (2.5 mg) almost completely inhibited (> 97%) serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity at 2 h after dosing. In the multiple dose study, angiotensin converting enzyme activity was inhibited by more than 80% 24 h after all doses of omapatrilat. Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase activity was shown by increases in the daily urinary excretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate at doses of more than 7.5 and 25 mg, respectively. In the single dose study, omapatrilat increased the daily urinary excretion of atrial natriuretic peptide dose-dependently from 10.8 +/- 4.1 (+/- SD) ng 24 h(-1) in the placebo group to 60.0 +/- 18.2 ng 24 h(-1) in the 500 mg group. Omapatrilat did not affect sodium and potassium excretion or urinary volume. Compared with placebo, omapatrilat produced a decrease in mean arterial pressure at 3 h after all doses in both the single- and multiple-dose studies. CONCLUSIONS: Omapatrilat was generally well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of omapatrilat are consistent with once-daily dosing.