5-fluorouracil modulated by leucovorin, methotrexate and mitomycin: highly effective, low-cost chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

We have reported that an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (FU) was superior to bolus FU in terms of response rate and progression-free survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Biochemical modulation was an essential part of this regimen and it was selective for the schedule of FU administration: bolus FU was in fact modulated by methotrexate (MTX) while continuous infusion FU was potentiated by 6-s-leucovorin (LV). Considering the low cost and the favourable report on the activity of mitomycin C (mito) added to CI FU, we have incorporated this agent in the infusional part of our treatment programme. 105 patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were accrued from 13 Italian centres and treated with the following regimen. 2 biweekly cycles of FU bolus (600 mg/m(2)), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg/m(2)) were alternated with a 3-week continuous infusion of FU (200 mg/m(2)daily), modulated by LV (20 mg/m(2)weekly bolus). Mito, 7 mg/m(2), was given on the first day of the infusional period. After a 1 week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated, if indicated. 5 complete and 34 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 37% on the intention to treat basis; 95% confidence limits, 28-46%). After a median follow-up time of 26 months, 37 patients are still alive. The median progression-free survival is 7.7 months with an overall survival of 18.8 months and a 2-year survival rate of 30%. The regimen was very well tolerated with fewer than 13% of patients experiencing WHO grade III-IV toxicity. These results are consistent with those obtained by our group in 3 previous trials of schedule specific biochemical modulation of FU. They also indicate a highly active, little toxic, inexpensive regimen of old drugs to be used (a) as an alternative to the more expensive combinations including CPT-11 or oxaliplatin or (b) as the basis for combination programmes with these agents.     

Addition of either irinotecan or methotrexate to bolus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid every 2 weeks in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomised study by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan (IRI) plus folinic acid (FA)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) i.v. bolus with a regimen of double modulation of 5-FU with methotrexate (MTX) and FA in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were enrolled: 118 patients received IRI 200 mg/m2 (90-min i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and 5-FU 850 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU), and 116 patients received MTX 750 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and FU 800 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (MTXFAFU). Both cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until progression or to a maximum of 16 cycles. Response rate (RR) was the main end point of the study; responses were assessed every four cycles and confirmed after 2 additional months of treatment. RESULTS: RR was significantly greater with IRIFAFU (36%) than with MTXFAFU (20%) (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IRIFAFU was significantly associated with a greater activity (P = 0.028). Median progression-free survival was longer with IRIFAFU than with MTXFAFU (7.2 months compared with 4.8 months; P = 0.048). Median survival time (MST) did not differ between the two arms (14.7 months compared with 14.8 months, respectively). Patients not receiving second-line chemotherapy, however, lived longer when treated in the first-line with IRIFAFU (MST 11.9 months compared with 6.4 months; P = 0.038). IRIFAFU caused a significantly greater occurrence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40% compared with 9%; P = 0.001) and diarrhoea (13% compared with 4%; P = 0.024), but a significantly lower incidence of stomatitis (3% compared with 12%; P = 0.007), than the comparative regimen. CONCLUSIONS: IRIFAFU appeared comparable in terms of activity and toxicity with other weekly or biweekly bolus or infusional combination regimens. IRIFAFU, however, seems easier to administer, because it does not require infusional catheter or pump devices, and it is less expensive. It may represent a new option for treating advanced colorectal carcinoma.     

Combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil bolus and infusion, and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P regimen) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in a monthly regimen is one of the standard treatments for advanced gastric carcinoma. This study evaluated the new LV5FU2-P regimen, designed to improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-FU plus cisplatin combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinoma were prospectively included in the study. They were treated every 14 days with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2 plus folinic acid 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 2, plus bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 and 2, plus continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day as a 22-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 2. Ten patients received a simplified regimen (folinic acid 40 mg/m(2) day 1 + bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) day 1 + continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2). RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for response and 42 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and 15 a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 52.3%]. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.4-10.9) and the overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 10.1-16.4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: LV5FU2-P is an active and well tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinomas. It warrants evaluation comparatively with other active regimens.     

A prospective randomized study of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks. The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017). The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Optimization of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination chemotherapy with a new schedule of leucovorin, 5-FU and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P regimen) in patients with biliary tract carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is associated with a very poor prognosis. To improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination in BTC, we designed a new therapeutic schedule, the LV5FU2-P regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced or metastatic BTC were prospectively enrolled in the study. The treatment (LV5FU2-P regimen) consisted of a biweekly administration of a 2-h infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), a 400 mg/m(2) bolus of 5-FU followed by a 22-h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on two consecutive days and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. Clinical symptoms, performance and weight changes were monitored. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 10 patients (34%) (95% confidence interval 23% to 45%) including one complete response and nine partial responses (stabilization 38%, progression 28%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.5 and 9.5 months, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 45% of patients and performance status improved in 60%. One patient had a grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 41% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study, one of the largest phase II trials performed for this disease, shows that the LV5FU2-P regimen is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic BTC.     

5-Methyltetrahydrofolate for biochemical modulation of fluorouracil (FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized phase I--II study of two different FU administration schedules

Background: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and therapeutic activity of MTHF-modulated FU using two different administration schedules of the antimetabolite (bolus vs. two-hour infusion), the present randomized study using a 'pick-the-winner' design was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.Patients and methods: Eighty-two patients with previously untreated advanced measurable colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with MTHF (100 mg/m2 days 1–5 i.v. bolus) plus FU (400 mg/m2 days 1–5) given either as i.v. bolus injection or as a two-hour infusion every four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as WHO grade 3 hematotoxicity and/or WHO grade 2 nonhematologic side effects) and evidence of progressive disease, the FU dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2/day during each subsequent cycle until the individual maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was reached.Results: Forty patients were randomized to the FU bolus arm and 42 patients to the FU two-hour infusion arm. The median MTD was 475 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 450–500) in the FU bolus arm with stomatitis ± diarrhea being the most common DLT. Gastrointestinal side effects were also dose-limiting in the two-hour infusion arm; however, the median MTD was 600 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 568–632). Myelosuppression was more pronounced in the FU bolus arm than in the two-hour infusion arm. The overall response rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 15–44%; 1 CR and 10 PR) for patients treated in the bolus arm and 14.5% (95% CI: 5–28%; 1 CR and 5 PR) for those treated in the two-hour infusion arm. Analogous to recorded response, median time to progression (8.5 vs. 6.25) and overall survival time (14.0 vs. 11.0) tended to be superior in the FU bolus arm.Conclusions: The observed differences in tolerable drug dose and toxicity between the two treatment arms might be explained by the administration schedule-dependent clinical pharmacokinetics of FU and/or the difference in extent of biochemical modulation of the antimetabolite through MTHF. The fact that the two regimens were not equitoxic probably also helps to explain the favourable response activity noted in the MTHF/FU bolus arm. Whether MTHF is as effective as leucovorin for biochemical modulation of FU remains to be determined in a randomized trial, for which we would recommend its combined use with bolus FU ('winner arm') using a starting dose of 400 mg/m2/day ×5.     

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (FU) vs. FU alone in metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized multicenter trial. The Association of Medical Oncology (AIO) of the German Cancer Society.

Methotrexate (MTX) modulates 5-fluorouracil (FU) in several in vitro and in vivo experimental systems. Results of phase II studies have suggested improved response rates for the sequential application of MTX and FU in colorectal cancer. In a prospective randomized multicenter study we compared sequential MTX (300 mg/m2) and FU (900 mg/m2) using a seven-hour time interval and leucovorin rescue with FU (450 mg/m2/d for five days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Of 172 patients randomized 159 were eligible for survival analysis and 153 for toxicity and response evaluation. Complete or partial response has been seen in 25.3% of patients receiving sequential MTX and FU and in 17.6% of those receiving FU alone (p = 0.11). There have been two long-term survivors, apparently cured by MTX/FU. Overall toxicity was more pronounced with FU alone, but sequential MTX/FU caused four toxic deaths. Median survival and survival rates at one and two years were not significantly different. It is concluded that this schedule of sequential MTX and FU is no more effective than a dose-intensive treatment with FU alone in metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C). RESULTS: The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.     

High dose alpha-2b interferon + folinic acid in the modulation of 5-fluorouracil. A phase II study in advanced colorectal cancer with evidence of an unfavourable cost/benefit ratio.

The combination of folinic acid (FA) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) is the most active systemic chemotherapy against advanced colorectal cancer. Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that the activity of 5FU can be improved by the addition of alpha-interferon (IFN). To evaluate the possibility of a double modulation of 5FU, a pilot study was conducted in the period July 1989-December 1989 with the following regimen: FA (200 mg/m2 i.v. bolus x 5 days) + 5FU (400 mg/m2 i.v. in 15 min x 5 days) + alpha-2b IFN (10 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously on alternate days). FA and 5FU administrations were repeated every 28 days; IFN was administered every week. In the 16 treated patients, 4 partial responses, 4 no changes, and 8 with progression of disease were observed, with an objective response rate of 25% (95% CI, 7.8%-55.1%). Median duration of response was 9.5 months, as was overall survival. Toxicity (fever, fatigue, neurotoxicity, stomatitis and diarrhea) was considerable and led to a reduction in IFN doses in 10/16 patients. Due to the unfavorable cost/benefit ratio, the study was closed and a new trial, with different doses and schedule of IFN, was started within the GISCAD (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer).     

A randomized phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of an experimental chemotherapy regimen (irinotecan + oxaliplatin, IRINOX) and two standard arms (LV5 FU2 + irinotecan or LV5 FU2 + oxaliplatin) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a study of the Digestive Group of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess activity and safety of an experimental combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IRINOX) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, 80 patients were treated: arm A (IRINOX) in 40 patients received at day 1 oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) biweekly, standard arm B received a biweekly simplified folinic acid (FA) and fluorouracil (FU), FA 200 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion and bolus injection of 5FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, then a two 400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion of FU on days 1 and 2 with either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (20 patients) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (20 patients). RESULTS: Twenty-one partial responses (52.5%, median duration 7.2 months) were observed with the IRINOX arm and two complete and 20 partial responses (55%, median duration 6.4 months) with arm B. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.4 and 19 months, respectively, in the IRINOX arm and 8.1 and 20.4 months in arm B. Main grade 3/4 toxic effects were, respectively, neutropenia 42.5% and 32.5%; febrile neutropenia 10% and 5%; diarrhea 32.5% and 7.5%; vomiting 10.0% and 5%; neurosensory toxicity 17.5% and 7.5%. CONCLUSION: The IRINOX arm has a manageable toxicity and is active.     

Randomised Phase III study of biweekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5FU with folinic acid and oxaliplatin versus monthly plus 5-FU/folinic acid in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase III study was started to compare oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in the first-line with bolus FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 302 patients were randomised and received bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) day 1-5, FA 20 mg/m(2) day 1-5, q 4 wk or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, FA 200 mg/m(2), 1-h infusion. 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2), 24-h infusion day 1, q 2 wk. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). RESULTS: The median follow-up is 31.8 months, 90.4% of the patients have died. Confirmed RR, progression free survival (PFS; months) and median overall survival (OS; months) in 5FU/LV versus 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin were respectively 18.5% versus (vs) 33.8% (P = 0.004), 5.6 vs 6.7 (P = 0.016) and 13.3 vs 13.8 (P = 0.619). In the 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin arm less grade (3/4) toxicity was measured for diarrhoea, stomatitis, an increase in idiosyncratic side effects and neurosensory events compared with 5FU/LV. The quality of life (QOL) was equal in both arms. Second line treatment was given in 62% of the patients, crossover of 5FU/LV to 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin in the first-line resulted in an increased RR and PFS with less grade 3/4 mucositis/diarrhoea compared with 5FU/LV alone. Idiosyncratic side effects deserve attention with oxaliplatin. Despite a low treatment cross over rate, OS in both groups was comparable.     

A Prospective Randomized Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11), Leucovorin (LV) and 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) versus Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m² bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m² bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m² (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m² bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m² bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks.

The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017).

The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Phase II study of a triplet regimen in advanced colorectal cancer using methotrexate, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil

Building upon the concept of schedule-specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (FU), which alternates bolus and continuous infusion (CI) FU, we have incorporated oxaliplatin (l-OHP) following the bolus part of the regimen to explore the activity of this new combination. Patients with advanced, untreated, measurable colorectal cancer received sequential methotrexate (MTX) (days 1 and 15)-->l-OHP+FU (days 2 and 16) (200, 85 and 600 mg m(-2), respectively) followed by 3 weeks of CI FU (200 mg m(-2) day(-1)) given from day 29 to 50, modulated by weekly leucovorin (LV) (20 mg m(-2)). After 1 week of rest, the second cycle was started. The treatment was continued until progression or patient's refusal. According to the intention-to-treat analysis on all 46 patients accrued, the response rate was 42% (95% CL=28-55%), with three complete responses and 16 partial responses. The median overall survival was 15.9 months and the median progression-free survival 6.9 months. Toxicity was very mild, with the bolus part of the regimen more toxic than the infusional part (24 vs 7% of grade III-IV, respectively). This new combination of MTX -->l-OHP-FU followed by FU CI is well tolerated, feasible and produces activity results similar to other more simple, but more toxic, regimens. Pros and cons of the different fluoropyrimidines-l-OHP combinations are discussed.     

5FU8小时静滴联合CF、卡铂治疗晚期鼻咽癌的临床研究

目的：根据５ＦＵ,ＣＦ药代动力学特点,设计５ＦＵ连续８小时静滴,ＣＦ１００ｍｇ,在５ＦＵ静滴第０,４,８小时３次静推的ＣＦ／５ＦＵ给药方案,联合卡铂对晚期鼻咽癌患者进行临床研究,重点摸索该联合化疗方案的剂量限制性毒性及５ＦＵ的最大耐受剂量（ＭＴＤ）方法：将符合入选条件的病例分组。互助 ３－５例,５ＦＵ剂量从５００ｍｇ／（ｍ＾２·ｄ）开始,以１２５ｍｇ／（ｍ＾２·ｄ）逐渐递增,直至最大耐受剂量,ＣＦ     

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.     

A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Seventy-four previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively randomized into one of three treatment regimens: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus daily for five days or toxicity, then 200 mg/m2 IV bolus every other day for six doses; (2) methotrexate (MTX) 50 mg/m2 in normal saline by IV infusion over four hours followed by an IV bolus of 5-FU 600 mg/m2. This was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks. (3) Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 in a two-hour IV infusion of normal saline with 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as an IV bolus one hour after the Leucovorin began every week for 6 weeks. The combined complete and partial response rates in the three regimens were 11%, 5%, and 48%, respectively (P = .0009). The median duration of response in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was 10 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment regimens with respect to survival time (P = .6). Toxicity in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was predominantly diarrhea (13 of 30 patients, 40%). In this regimen, eight of 13 patients (52%) who developed diarrhea not only required a dose reduction of 5-FU, but also hospitalization for IV hydration. The predominant toxicity in the 5-FU alone regimen and the 5-FU and MTX regimen was leukopenia. One drug-related death occurred in each regimen.     

Schedule-selective biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study.

We have recently reported high clinical activity against advanced colorectal cancer of a regimen-alternating bolus FUra, modulated by methotrexate (MTX), and continuous infusion FUra, modulated by 6-s-leucovorin (6-s-LV). Considering the low toxicity of the bolus part of this regimen and our recent in vitro finding of a strong synergism between bolus FUra and natural-beta-IFN (n-beta-IFN), this cytokine was incorporated in the bolus part of our treatment programme. Fifty-six patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were treated with two biweekly cycles of FUra bolus (600 mg m(-2)), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg m(-2)), and n-beta-IFN (3 x 10(6) IU i.m. every 12 h, starting at the time of FUra administration for four doses), alternating with a 3-week continuous infusion of FUra (200 mg m(-2) daily), modulated by 6-s-LV (20 mg m(-2) weekly bolus). After a 1-week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated if indicated. A total of 5 complete and 17 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 41%; 95% confidence limits, 28-55%) in 54 assessable patients. After a median follow-up time of 36 months, five patients are still alive. Overall, the median time to treatment failure was 6.4 months. The median duration of survival was 15.0 months. There was one treatment-related death after a course of MTX --> bolus FUra/n-beta-IFN and grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 18% of the patients. As the addition of n-beta-IFN results in high toxicity, whereas the efficacy seems to be similar to that of the same regimen without the cytokine, our groups are currently randomizing the original regimen, without IFN, against standard modulated bolus FUra.     

Efficacy and safety of an irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil and L-leucovorin regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japanese patients: experience in a single institution in Japan

BACKGROUND: Short-term infusion of 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin has been considered as standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, until infusion of 5-fluorouracil regimens and oxaliplatin was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan early in 2005, combination of irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin had been the standard treatment. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen in Japanese colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Forty-six patients untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer received a modified form of the irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen, consisting of intravenous irinotecan (100 mg/m2) and l-leucovorin (10 mg/m2), and then 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus infusion, weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence interval, 34-62%), and 48% of patients had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months and overall survival was 20.3 months. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was as follows: neutropenia, 50%; diarrhea, 4%; fatigue, 13%; nausea, 7%; and vomiting, 7%. Neither treatment-related nor all-cause mortality occurred within 60 days of chemotherapy initiation. Despite the limited availability of oxaliplatin, 29 patients received an oxaliplatin-based regimen after progression. CONCLUSION: A modified irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin regimen was an active and well-tolerated regimen in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, showing a different toxicity profile from Western patients.     

Retrospective comparison of two different schedules of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a single institution experience

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of weekly irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and folinic acid (FA) regimen (IFL) versus biweekly irinotecan with infusional 5-FU and FA (FOLFIRI) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatments outcome of 86 pts (IFL - 38 pts, FOLFIRI - 48 pts) was evaluated. Chemotherapy regimens were as follows: IFL - intravenous (i.v.) infusion irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) over 90 min and 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) preceded by FA 20 mg/m(2) both given by i.v. bolus injection, all repeated on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 every 6 weeks; FOLFIRI - i.v. irinotecan 180 mg/ m(2) on days 1 and 15 with subsequent FA 200 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion and i.v. bolus injection of 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU immediately followed by 22-hour i.v. infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 152 (mean - 4) IFL cycles and 328 (mean - 6) FOLFIRI cycles were administered. Average dose intensity was 0.8 and 0.78 respectively. Toxicities were mild and manageable for both regimens evaluated. Overall response rate was 36.8% in IFL arm and 44.7% in FOLFIRI arm. At the median follow-up of 16 months in IFL arm and 14 months in FOPFIRI arm the two year survival was 38% and 45%, the median survival was 18 months and 21.5 months, and the median progression free survival was 6 months and 9.4 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, both IFL and FOLFIRI regimens have acceptable toxicity at a similar level of dose intensity. Compared to IFL, FOLFIRI seems to improve progression-free survival.     

Thymidylate synthase protein expression in advanced colon cancer: correlation with the site of metastasis and the clinical response to leucovorin-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil.

Recently, we have demonstrated that thymidylate synthase (TS) protein expression predicts for the clinical response to a regimen of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Previous studies by other groups that showed a correlation between TS gene expression and response to the fluoropyrimidine also involved infusional regimens. Considering the putatively different mechanism of action of bolus compared with continuous infusion of 5FU, the aim of the present study was to test whether the correlation between TS expression and the clinical response to 5FU is valid for bolus regimens. A secondary aim was to compare TS levels between liver metastases and abdominal recurrences from colon cancer, because these sites have a distinctly different responsiveness to 5FU chemotherapy. The study population consisted of 41 patients (25 males and 16 females; median age, 60 years) with unresectable metastatic or recurrent colon cancer, homogeneously treated with 5FU (420 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-5) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-5); cycles were repeated every 28 days. Twenty-seven patients (66%) showed high levels of TS expression as defined by TS scores equal to 3 and 4. The proportion of cases with high levels of TS expression was significantly higher in abdominal recurrences (18 of 22, 82%) compared with liver metastases (9 of 19, 47%; P = 0.02). Intratumoral TS protein expression was inversely correlated with response to chemotherapy (response rate: 7 of 14, 50%, versus 0 of 27 in patients with low and high levels of TS expression, respectively; P = 0.0001). These results confirm that the level of TS protein expression predicts for response to 5FU, even with a bolus schedule. The higher TS levels observed in abdominal compared with liver metastases may account for their different responsiveness to 5FU chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical quantitation of TS protein levels may thus allow us to change the therapeutic approach to advanced colorectal cancer from a general to an individual treatment strategy at a time when new non TS-targeted drugs have become available for this disease.