Effects of direct adsorption of lipoproteins apheresis on lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein subtypes, and hemorheology in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease.

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) apheresis has been shown to reduce effectively low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) concentrations. However, the effects on nontraditional risk indicators such as hemorheology and LDL subtypes have not been investigated so far. Five patients (2 women, 3 men, age 53 +/- 8 years) with coronary artery disease and severe LDL hypercholesterolemia regularly treated with other LDL apheresis devices entered the study and were then treated with DALI for the first time. Hemorheological and lipoprotein parameters were measured before and immediately after the initial DALI apheresis as well as before the fourth DALI apheresis. Compared to baseline (before the first DALI apheresis), the following parameters were significantly improved (p < 0.05) after the first DALI apheresis: LDL cholesterol (69 +/- 28 versus 208 +/- 82 mg/dl) and cholesterol in each LDL subfraction as well as plasma viscosity (1.23 +/- 0.04 versus 1.37 +/- 0.06 mPa), C-reactive protein, native blood viscosity, red cell aggregation, and red cell deformability. When parameters before the fourth DALI apheresis were compared to baseline, LDL cholesterol was still lower, and red cell deformability was still improved while cholesterol in each subfraction showed a statistical trend to lower concentrations (0.08 < p < 0.14). In conclusion, DALI apheresis not only reduces LDL cholesterol but also induced a significant reduction of cholesterol in all LDL subfractions and improved various hemorheological parameters.     

Atorvastatin compared with simvastatin-based therapies in the management of severe familial hyperlipidaemias

We compared atorvastatin with simvastatin-based therapies in a prospective observational study of 201 patients with severe hyperlipidaemia. Atorvastatin 10 mg therapy was substituted for simvastatin 20 mg, 20 mg for 40 mg, 40 mg for simvastatin 40 mg plus resin, and 80 mg for simvastatin-fibrate-resin therapy. Lipid and safety profiles were assessed. Atorvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 31 +/- 11-40 +/- 14% vs. 25 +/- 12-31 +/- 11%; LDL by 38 +/- 16-45 +/- 18% vs. 31 +/- 18-39 +/- 18% and geometric mean triglycerides by 29.3-37.3% vs. 16.6-24.8%, but reduced HDL 11% +/- 47% at 80 mg compared with a 16% +/- 34% increase with simvastatin-based therapy. Target LDL < 3.5 mmol/l was achieved more often with atorvastatin (63% vs. 50%; p < 0.001). Atorvastatin increased geometric mean fibrinogen by 12-20% vs. a 0-6% fall with simvastatin (p < 0.001). Side effects were noted in 10-36% of patients, including one case of rhabdomyolysis, and 36% discontinued therapy. These data suggest that atorvastatin is more effective than current simvastatin-based therapies in achieving treatment targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia but at the expense of a possible increase in side-effects. This issue needs further study in randomized controlled trials.     

Efficacy of different low-density lipoprotein apheresis methods.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is a treatment option in patients with coronary heart disease and drug resistant hypercholesterolemia. Various apheresis systems based on different elimination concepts are currently in use. We compared the efficacy of 4 different apheresis systems concerning the elimination of lipoproteins. The study included 7 patients treated by heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP), 10 patients treated by immunoadsorption, 8 patients treated by dextran-sulfate adsorption, and 4 patients treated by cascade filtration. Ten subsequent aphereses were evaluated in patients undergoing regular apheresis for more than 6 months. Total cholesterol decreased by approximately 50% with all 4 systems. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (64-67%) and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] (61-64%) were decreased more effectively by HELP, immunoadsorption, and dextran-sulfate apheresis than by the less specific cascade filtration system [LDL-C reduction 56%, Lp(a) reduction 53%]. Triglyceride concentrations were reduced by 40% (dextran-sulfate) to 49% (cascade filtration) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) by 9% (dextran-sulfate) to 25% (cascade filtration). On the basis of plasma volume treated, HELP was the most efficient system (LDL-C reduction 25.0%/L plasma), followed by dextran-sulfate (21.0%/L plasma), cascade (19.4%/L plasma), and immunoadsorption (17.0%/L plasma). However, a maximal amount of 3 L plasma can be processed with HELP due to concomitant fibrinogen reduction while there is no such limitation with immunoadsorption. Therefore, the decision of which system should be used in a given patient must be individualized taking the pre-apheresis LDL concentration, concomitant pharmacotherapy, and fibrinogen concentration into account.     

Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg in the treatment of 26 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia over 12 weeks using an open crossover trial format. Both, similarly, reduced LDL by 47 +/- 13% and 43 +/- 16% and median triglycerides by 22% and 27% respectively. However, atorvastatin reduced HDL by 2 +/- 24% compared with 8 +/- 30% increase with simvastatin (p = 0.05) affecting the LDL:HDL ratio achieved (4.478 +/- 1.56 vs 3.74 +/- 0.93, p = 0.001). Atorvastatin raised median fibrinogen by 15% compared with a non-significant 5% increase with simvastatin (p = 0.05). Simvastatin reduced lipoprotein (a) by a median 20% compared with baseline (p = 0.05) compared with 5% for atorvastatin. Side-effects, mostly gastrointestinal, were seen in four patients (16%) with atorvastatin compared with one case of myalgia with simvastatin (4%). We conclude both drugs are equally effective in LDL reduction but that simvastatin is superior in raising HDL and causes fewer side-effects. These results require confirmation in larger studies.     

Hemorheology and H.E.L.P. in multi-infarct dementia]

Some papers report that the effect of heparin-mediated extracorporeal LDL less than cholesterol, LP(a), triglycerides, fibrinogen greater than precipitation (H.E.L.P.) in cardiovascular disease may results from an influence on the above-mentioned parameters. Hence, this method has been applied in multi-infarct dementia (MID), where fibrinogen, whole blood and plasma viscosity and red cell transit time (RCTT) are increased. The selection of patients was based on DMS-3, on NINCDS/ADRDA criteria and on the Hachinski Ischemic Stroke Scale. All the patients (n = 14) were examined magnet resonance imaging. Fibrinogen, cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LP(a), RCTT and plasma and whole blood viscosity were determined prior to, and after each two H.E.L.P. procedures. Fibrinogen was lowered (in a comparison of the data prior to the first and following the second plasmapheresis) from 526.4 +/- 114 to 314.1 +/- 80.1 mg/dl (p less than 0.01), cholesterol from 210.8 +/- 76.8 to 131.3 +/- 38.2 mg/dl (p less than 0.01), LDL from 125 +/- 53 mg/dl to 63.6 +/- 25.7 mg/dl (p less than 0.01), LP(a) from 26.2 +/- 13.2 to 12.0 +/- 9.5 mg/dl (p less than 0.01), HDL from 31.7 +/- 6.3 to 29.7 +/- 5.6 mg/dl (no significance), RCTT from 14.4 +/- 2.8 to 10.9 +/- 0.9 (p less than 0.01), whole blood viscosity (low shear rate) from 11.64 +/- 1.7 to 8.74 +/- 1.4 mPa/sec (p less than 0.01) and (high shear rate) from 5.38 +/- 0.58 to 4.28 +/- 0.83 mPa/sec (p less than 0.01). Plasma viscosity decreased from 1.51 +/- 0.12 mPa/sec to 1.25 +/- 0.1 mPa/sec (p less than 0.05). In cases of MID the implementation of H.E.L.P. therefore enabled an alteration of the hemorheological profile which has so far not been achieved by any hemorheologically active substance to a comparable degree and in comparable time.     

Simvastatin and pravastatin equally improve flow-mediated dilation in males with hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Both simvastatin and pravastatin have been shown to improve endothelial function in patients with hypercholesterolemia. To our knowledge there has been no comparative study of these two HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on endothelial dysfunction measured by flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Fourteen middle-aged males with hypercholesterolemia (means +/- SD: total cholesterol 7.03 +/- 0.88 mmol/l, LDL cholesterol 5.02 +/- 0.63 mmol/l, HDL cholesterol 1.3 +/- 0.38 mmol/l and triglycerides 1.47 +/- 0.26 mmol/l) were randomised, after a 6 weeks' run-in phase with AHA step I diet treatment, to 12 weeks' treatment either with simvastatin or pravastatin. Both statins were given in a daily dose of 10 mg for 6 weeks, which was increased to 20 mg daily in patients who did not achieve an LDL-cholesterol goal of < 3.4 mmol/l. Endothelial dysfunction was measured as flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (FMD) using high resolution ultrasound. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the drugs in reduction of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, or elevation of HDL cholesterol. FMD increased in the simvastatin group from 6.8 +/- 3.2 to 12.3 +/- 2.9% (p < 0.03) and in the pravastatin group from 6.3 +/- 4.8 to 13.3 +/- 4.7% (p = 0.001). The improvement in FMD was the same in both groups (p = 0.64) and did not correlate with changes of the lipid parameters measured. CONCLUSIONS: Both simvastatin and pravastatin reduce endothelial dysfunction to the same degree in patients with hypercholesterolemia, independently of changes in lipid parameters.     

LDL apheresis in clinical practice: long-term treatment of severe hyperlipidemia.

Thirty patients (13 males, 17 females) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid-lowering drugs were treated for 48.7 +/- 19.2 months (range, 2-87 months) with low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Three different systems (dextran sulfate adsorption for 27 of 30 [Kaneka, Liposorber, Japan], immunoadsorption system for 2 of 30 [Baxter, Therasorb, Germany], immunoadsorption system with special lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] columns for 1 of 30 patients [Lipopak, Pocard, Russia]) were applied. Before LDL apheresis 24 of 30 patients suffered from coronary heart disease (CHD) with angina symptoms. With LDL apheresis, reductions of 46% for total cholesterol, 49% for LDL, 30% for Lp(a), and 38% for triglycerides were reached. Severe side effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.5%). In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced in 27 of 30 patients. A 60 to 100% reduction of nitrate medication was observed in 17 of 24 patients. Regarding the different apheresis systems used, at the end of the trial there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome experienced by the patients and concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high density lipoprotein, and triglyceride concentrations. But to reduce high Lp(a) levels, the immunoadsorption method with special Lp(a) columns seems to be the most effective (-57% versus 25% [Kaneka] and 23% [Baxter]). The present data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia, resistant to maximum conservative therapy, is very effective and safe, even in long-term application.     

Incremental cholesterol reduction with ezetimibe/simvastatin,atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in UK General Practice (IN‐PRACTICE): randomised controlled trial of achievement of Joint British Societies (JBS‐2) cholesterol targets

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy with intensified statin monotherapy as alternative treatment strategies to achieve the Joint British Societies (JBS)‐2 and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence low‐density‐lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) target of < 2 mmol/l for secondary prevention or JBS‐2 LDL‐C target of < 2 mmol/l for primary prevention in high‐risk patients who have failed to reach target with simvastatin 40 mg. Methods: This is a prospective, double‐blind study conducted in 34 UK primary care centres; 1748 patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes or high risk of CVD who had been taking simvastatin 40 mg for ≥ 6 weeks were screened and 786 (45%) with fasting LDL‐C ≥ 2.0 mmol/l (and < 4.2 mmol/l) at screening and after a further 6‐week run‐in period on simvastatin 40 mg were randomised to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg (as a combination tablet; n = 261), atorvastatin 40 mg (n = 263) or rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 73) or 10 mg (n = 189) once daily for 6 weeks. Rosuvastatin dose was based on UK prescribing instructions. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving LDL‐C < 2 mmol/l at the end of the study. Results: The percentage of patients (adjusted for baseline differences) achieving LDL‐C < 2 mmol/l was 69.4% with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg, compared with 33.5% for atorvastatin 40 mg [odds ratio 4.5 (95% CI: 3.0–6.8); p < 0.001] and 14.3% for rosuvastatin 5 or 10 mg [odds ratio 13.6 (95% CI: 8.6–21.6); p < 0.001]. Similar results were observed for achievement of total cholesterol < 4.0 mmol/l. All study treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: Approximately 45% of patients screened had not achieved LDL‐C < 2 mmol/l after ≥ 12 weeks of treatment with simvastatin 40 mg. In this group, treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg achieved target LDL‐C levels in a significantly higher proportion of patients during a 6‐week period than switching to either atorvastatin 40 mg or rosuvastatin 5–10 mg.     

Low density lipoprotein apheresis in treatment of hyperlipidemia: experience with four different technologies.

The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidaemia (HLP), sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid lowering drugs is poor. A new therapeutic option for such patients is regular treatment with low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. In total 33 patients (16 males, 17 female, aged 43.8+/-14.3 years), suffering from severe HLP resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, were treated for 62.3+/-21.3 (range, 1-113) months with LDL-apheresis. Four different LDL-apheresis systems were used: the dextran sulfate adsorption for 28 of 33 (Liposorber, Kaneka, Japan), immunoadsorption for 2 of 33 (Therasorb, Baxter, Germany), LDL-hemoperfusion for 2 of 33 (Dali, Fresenius, Germany), and the immunoadsorption system with special antilipoprotein (a) columns for 1 of 33 patients (Lipopak, Pocard, Russia). Before applying LDL-apheresis, 27 of 33 patients suffered from CHD with severe angina pectoris symptoms, a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery venous bypass (CAVB). With LDL-apheresis, reductions (p < 0.05) of 46% for total cholesterol, 49% for LDL, 28% for Lp(a), and 38% for triglycerides were reached. Severe side-effects, such as shock or allergic reactions, were very rare (0.5%). In the course of treatment an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced in 29 of 33 patients. In 23 of 27 patients suffering from CHD, a reduction of 60 to 100% of nitrate medication was observed. Regarding the different apheresis systems used, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome and concerning total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations. But, in respect to elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, the immunoadsorption method using special anti-lipoprotein (a) columns seems to be the most effective (-57% versus -25% [Kaneka, p < 0.05] or -23% [Baxter, p < 0.05]). The present data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe HLP, refractory to maximum conservative therapy, is effective and safe in long-term application.     

Treatment for dyslipidemias in patients with arterial hypertension

AIM: To evaluate a combination of the effects of non-drug measures and rozuvastatin on the lipid spectrum and blood pressure (BP) in patients with treated arterial hypertension (AH) concurrent with dyslipidemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The multicenter open-labeled prospective program included 299 patients from 19 cities and towns of Russia. Two hundred and eighty-eight patients completed phase 1 of the program; out of them 279 patients (149 males and 130 females) aged 58-80 years (56.7 +/- 8.7 years) with a mean AH history of 10.3 +/- 8.4 years. Phase 1 of the program involved 3 visits and it was over 12 weeks after rozuvastatin therapy. Phase 2 (including a visit 12 weeks following the termination of Phase 1) is being continued. RESULTS: Rozuvastatin therapy resulted in a reduction in the levels of total cholesterol (TC) by 2.5 +/- 0.8 mmol/l (p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 2.2 +/- 0.8 mmol/l (p < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) by 0.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/l (p < 0.001), and atherogenicity index (AI) by 2.8 +/- 1.4 (p < 0.001) and an increase in the content of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 0.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l (p < 0.001), which produced the target levels of LDL cholesterol in 61% of the patients, HDL cholesterol in 70%, and TG in 73%. During unaltered antihypertensive therapy there were also decreases in body mass by 1.5 +/- 2.8 mmol/l (p < 0.001), body mass index by 0.5 +/- 1.0 kg/ m2 (p < 0.001), waist circumference by 1.0 +/- 3.2 cm (p < 0.001), and BP by 72 +/- 14.2/4.1 +/- 8.6 mm Hg (p < 0.001). There was an increase in the activity of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, and creatine phosphokinase; however, this was clinically significant in none patients. CONCLUSION: Rozuvastatin significantly lowers the levels of TC, LDL cholesterol, TG, and AI and elevates the concentration of HDL cholesterol. In the majority (83%) of the patients, rozuvastatin used in a dose of 10 mg/day was sufficient to normalize the lipid profile, which makes it possible to recommend that rozuvastatin therapy should be started from this dose.     

D-glucose additive protects against osmotic-induced decrease in erythrocyte filterability

Glucose has long-term effects on erythrocyte filterability owing to sorbitol accumulation and glycosylation of intracellular proteins, but glucose effects prior to these long-term metabolic consequences have not been studied to the same extent. D-glucose is osmotically inert in erythrocytes because of facilitated diffusion. Erythrocyte volume regulation, hemolysis and filterability were studied with reference to effects of glucose derivatives dissolved in water. Control situations were water alone or buffer. Salt-stock dilution by water, D-glucose, or 3-O-M-glucose in water (both 570 mmol/L additives) created volume increases of 4.0 +/- 0.2%, 3.4 +/- 0.5% and 3.3 +/- 0.2%, respectively, whereas L-glucose resulted in a 2.2 +/- 0.4% volume decrease (all p < 0.001 versus baseline, mean values +/- SEM). D-glucose at a final concentration 30 mmol/L did not display any osmotic properties. Despite erythrocyte swelling, electrolyte-free glucose did not induce any significant changes in filterability with either 3-microm or 5-microm filters. 3-O-M-glucose gave a 7.8 +/- 1.4% decrease in 3-microm filterability (mean value +/- SEM, p < 0.001), but not to the same extent as by water alone at the corresponding dilution rate (31.7 +/- 3.5%, mean value +/- SEM, p < 0.001). L-glucose caused a 2.0 +/- 0.8% decrease in filterability across the 5-microm (mean value +/- SEM, p < 0.05), but not with the 3-microm filters. Stressing the glucose transport system further, to simulate the water-like properties of electrolyte-free glucose during intravenous infusion, we found that glucose becomes osmotically active and prevents hemolysis at these extreme concentrations (> 114 mmol/L). We conclude that an in vivo concentration range of D-glucose protects the erythrocytes from a decreased filterability induced by osmotic swelling but without having any osmotic properties.     

The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.

Due to recent advances in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations below 2.6 mmol/l have become attainable. In general, LDL cholesterol is determined indirectly according to Friedewald. We examined the performance of the Friedewald formula at low concentrations of LDL cholesterol in comparison with a beta-quantification method. We analyzed 176 samples from individuals treated by LDL apheresis with a mean LDL cholesterol concentration of 3.07 mmol/l and found that the Friedewald formula underestimated LDL cholesterol with a bias of -18.5%, -14.5%, -7.3%, and -3.8% at mean LDL cholesterol levels of 1.58, 2.4, 3.49, and 4.67 mmol/l, respectively. Thus, the lower the LDL cholesterol concentration was, the greater the negative bias. We conclude that the Friedewald formula may not be reliable at low LDL cholesterol concentrations produced by LDL apheresis. This finding may also be of relevance to the monitoring of patients being treated with lipid lowering drugs.     

Hemostatic effects of atorvastatin versus simvastatin

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with primary hypercholesterolemia without coronary heart disease were treated with atorvastatin 10-20 mg/d or simvastatin 10-20 mg/d. At baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, lipid levels such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), and hemostatic parameters such as platelet counts, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) prothrombin time (PT), and fibrinogen levels were measured. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the doses of the statins were increased to 20 mg/d in 10 of 35 (28.5%) patients treated with atorvastatin and 18 of 26 (69.2%) patients treated with simvastatin when the target level of LDL-C (130 mg/dL) was not reached. Mean doses were atorvastatin 12.8 mg/d and simvastatin 16.9 mg/d. After 24 weeks, 5 patients (14.3%) in the atorvastatin group and 4 patients (15.3%) in the simvastatin group had not reached the goal. In patients with diabetes, target level (LDL-C <100 mg/dL) was not reached in 35.7% of patients in the atorvastatin group and 44.4% of patients in the simvastatin group. Both simvastatin and atorvastatin were effective in lowering TC and LDL-C levels (p < 0.001). Atorvastatin lowered TGs significantly (p < 0.01). Neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin significantly reduced VLDL-C levels. HDL-C levels increased with atorvastatin, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Platelet counts decreased with both statins nonsignificantly. Moreover, fibrinogen levels decreased with simvastatin and atorvastatin, but these reductions were significant only for simvastatin (p < 0.05). We detected prolongation of the PT with both drugs (p < 0.05); however, prolongation of the PTT was significant only with simvastatin (p < 0.001). Effectiveness of both statins on lipid and hemostatic parameters was dose related. Adverse effects were seen in 5 patients (14.2%) treated with atorvastatin and 3 patients (11.5%) treated with simvastatin. Elevations in serum transaminase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal and in creatine phosphokinase >5 times the upper limit of normal were not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin on lipid parameters, although statistically insignificantly, while simvastatin produced more significant changes than atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters. The mean dose of simvastatin was greater than that of atorvastatin. Both statins had increased effects on lipid and hemostatic parameters when doses were increased. Atorvastatin and simvastatin were well tolerated. Different effects of statins on lipid levels and on coagulation parameters should be considered in patients with hypercholesterolemia and tendency to coagulation, especially in preventing thrombotic events. Further studies in larger trials are needed to confirm these observations.     

Treatment with atorvastatin reduces serum adipocyte-fatty acid binding protein value in patients with hyperlipidaemia

BACKGROUND: Adipocyte-fatty acid binding protein (A-FABP) is a circulating protein expressed in adipocytes and macrophages. Several recent studies demonstrated that A-FABP might be involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome, particularly in dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of atorvastatin treatment (20 mg day(-1) for 3 months) on serum A-FABP value in subjects with hyperlipidaemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anthropometric and serum analyses were performed for body mass index, A-FABP, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), creatine kinase (CK) and glucose on 26 subjects (BMI 30.3 +/- 6.0, mean age 62 +/- 10 years) with hyperlipidaemia who met the criteria: total cholesterol > 5.2 mmol L(-1), LDL cholesterol > 3.3 mmol L(-1) and triglycerides < 3 mmol L(-1). RESULTS: After the 3-month therapy, a significant reduction in total cholesterol (P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), glucose (P < 0.001), A-FABP (from 44.6 +/- 26.2 to 38.6 +/- 19.3 g L(-1), P < 0.01), uric acid (P < 0.05), AST (P < 0.05) and triglycerides (P < 0.05) values was observed. No difference was found in BMI, CK, ALT, hs-CRP, or HDL cholesterol values. A significant difference in the serum A-FABP value before and after the therapy remains after the correction for total cholesterol value (P < 0.001). A positive correlation between serum A-FABP and glucose was found (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study confirmed in vivo that atorvastatin reduces serum A-FABP by a pleiotropic mechanism and supports the hypothesis that A-FABP is involved in atherosclerotic actions.     

Use of an indirect effect model to describe the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect by statins in hypercholesterolaemic patients

Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. This is due to their efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) level which is the primary goal of the treatment especially for patients with multiple risk factors or with established coronary heart diseases. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that describes the LDL-lowering process in patients with hypercholesterolaemia treated with atorvastatin, fluvastatin or simvastatin. A total of 100 patients were studied retrospectively. They received atorvastatin (n = 57), fluvastatin (n = 26) or simvastatin (n = 17). As no pharmacokinetic data were available, the absorption rate was fixed to 1/h and atorvastatin, simvastatin and fluvastatin elimination half-lives were fixed to 14, 2 and 2.5 h respectively. A total of 309 LDL levels were measured and the data were analysed by nonmem v. The time course of the LDL-lowering effect of statins was described by an indirect-response model with precursor (LDL synthesis, input rate K(in)) and response (circulating LDL, input and output rates K) compartments. The following parameters were estimated: LDL input rate (K(in)) 0.14 +/- 0.015 g/L/day (mean +/- SD); inhibition fraction of K(in) (INH) 0.21 +/- 0.017; and dose producing 50% increase of LDL removal (D50), 26 +/- 7.8, 1.3 +/- 0.48 and 15 +/- 5.25 mg for atorvastatin, simvastatin and fluvastatin, respectively. Gender, bodyweight, age, calories/day, sugar/day, lipids/day, hyperlipidaemia types and waist/hip circumference, renal and hepatic functions had no effect on the pharmacodynamic parameters. The pharmacodynamic parameters for the three statins were accurately estimated. The PK/PD model developed successfully predicted the time course of the LDL-lowering effect of statins.     

Short-term and long-term effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): is lowering Lp(a) by LDL apheresis effective on restenosis after PTCA?

It has been reported that serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels in patients with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were significantly higher than in patients without restenosis. In this study, we evaluated the preventive effect of LDL apheresis on restenosis after PTCA in patients with hypercholesterolemia. For 10 patients who had shown a serum cholesterol level of more than 220 mg/dl despite treatment with antihypercholesterolemic drugs, LDL apheresis was conducted every 2 weeks after a successful PTCA until restenosis could be checked. In 4 patients, LDL apheresis was conducted for 2 years. LDL apheresis significantly reduced serum cholesterol from 248 +/- 22 mg/dl to 135 +/- 26 mg/dl and Lp(a) from 42 +/- 34 mg/dl to 21 +/- 16 mg/dl. The average degree of stenosis in the 11 lesions undergoing PTCA was 92 +/- 6% before PTCA, 35 +/- 10% immediately after PTCA, and 38 +/- 19% at 3 to 4 months after PTCA. Restenosis was observed in only 1 lesion. In 4 patients who received LDL apheresis for 2 years, restenosis did not occur in any of the 4 lesions treated. We concluded that LDL apheresis was an efficacious therapy to prevent restenosis after PTCA in patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

Effect of tablet splitting on serum cholesterol concentrations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of tablet splitting on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol values in patients taking simvastatin and atorvastatin. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol values of patients instructed to split simvastatin or atorvastatin between January 1999 and November 2000. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Huntington, WV. PATIENTS: Patients were included if they were taking simvastatin or atorvastatin with regular lipid management and follow-up laboratory results. Patients were required to remain on the same milligram-per-day dose at least 6-8 weeks before and after tablet-splitting initiation and have cholesterol values drawn at least 6 weeks after initiation of both whole-tablet and half-tablet dosing. Patients were excluded if they had a triglyceride level > 400 mg/dL or were noncompliant on the basis of pharmacy records and provider notes. MEASUREMENT OUTCOMES: The primary end points were changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol values before and after the patient was switched to half-tablet therapy. RESULTS: The overall results for this review demonstrated no statistically significant increase in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol values actually decreased from presplitting to postsplitting, p = 0.017 and p = 0.003, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation showed that half-tablet dosing was as effective as whole-tablet dosing. The program will be continued as a part of quality patient care at the Huntington Veterans Affairs Medical Center.     

Effects of peritoneal dialysis with an overnight icodextrin dwell on parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a reduced daily glucose load by overnight application of the less-absorbed glucose polymer icodextrin would have favorable effects on lipid profiles of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study with two subsequent periods of 6 weeks. SETTING: Home PD unit of a secondary-care hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-one nondiabetic CAPD patients (15 male, 6 female; mean age 50.3+/-11.8 years). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive an overnight dwell with either standard glucose solution or with a 7.5% icodextrin-containing solution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relation between reduction in the total amount of intraperitoneal infused glucose and parameters of glucose (plasma glucose, insulin, and HbA1C) and lipid metabolism [free fatty acids, plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction profile]. RESULTS: After the icodextrin dwells, a reduction of plasma total cholesterol (from 5.43+/-0.85 to 4.86+/-0.70 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and LDL cholesterol (from 3.38+/-0.87 to 2.93+/-0.73 mmol/L, p = 0.001) was observed. Also, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (from 0.95+/-0.27 to 0.90+/-0.24 mmol/L, p = 0.029) was reduced, but the plasma total cholesterol-to-HDL ratio remained similar. Plasma free fatty acids and triglyceride levels tended to decrease (from 0.16+/-0.10 to 0.13+/-0.08 mmol/L, p= 0.06, and from 2.14+/-1.96 to 1.92+/-1.03 mmol/L, respectively). Evaluation of LDL subfraction profiles after ultracentrifugation showed a more buoyant LDL subfraction profile with fewer dense LDL particles in 6 patients and no changes in 14 patients after icodextrin.The effects on lipids were not accompanied by a decrease in fasting plasma glucose (from 5.76+/-1.29 to 5.86+/-0.80 mmol/L) or insulin levels (from 19.5+/-14.4 to 20.3+/-13.0 mU/L). CONCLUSION: These results suggest a beneficial effect on lipid profiles of CAPD patients with the use of an overnight dwell with icodextrin.     

High protein diet complements resin therapy of familial hypercholesterolemia.

The intermediate-term effects on plasma lipoprotein lipids of substituting meat and dairy protein for carbohydrate in the diets of five subjects (three women, two men) with familial hypercholesterolemia receiving cholestyramine (mean dose, 18 g/d) were studied. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the high or low protein diets (mean 27 versus 10% of energy as protein, 25% as fat, and 48 versus 65% as carbohydrate) for 4 to 5 weeks and then switched to the other diet for another 4 to 5 weeks. Mean fasting plasma HDL cholesterol rose significantly by 17 +/- 3% (1.11 +/- 0.12 vs 0.95 +/- 0.11 mmol/L, p less than 0.005, n = 5), whereas total triglycerides fell by 23 +/- 2% (1.7 +/- 0.3 vs 2.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/L, p less than 0.005, n = 5), VLDL triglycerides fell by 28 +/- 5% (0.88 +/- 0.15 vs 1.18 +/- 0.19 mmol/L, p less than 0.02, n = 5), VLDL cholesterol fell by 32 +/- 7% (0.39 +/- 0.08 vs 0.56 +/- 0.09 mmol/L, p less than 0.01, n = 5), the ratio of LDL cholesterol: HDL cholesterol by 19 +/- 5% (4.7 +/- 0.7 vs 5.7 +/- 0.7, p less than 0.05) and that of total cholesterol: HDL cholesterol by 16 +/- 5% (6.6 +/- 0.5 vs 8.0 +/- 0.7, p less than 0.05) on the high versus low protein diet. Increasing dietary protein intake at the expense of carbohydrate may be useful in treating hypoalphalipoproteinemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.     

Standardized ultrasound as a new method to induce platelet aggregation: evaluation, influence of lipoproteins and of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban.

Most of the published studies concerning platelet aggregation were performed with chemical stimulation procedures, however, mechanical stimulation might be a better simulation of physiological activation of platelets. In order to evaluate the influence of ultrasound on platelet aggregation in vitro, we developed an ultrasound device in a standardized set-up, and we evaluated the influence of lipoproteins and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban on ultrasound induced platelet aggregation. A cylindrical shaped plastic test tube with 1 ml of platelet-rich plasma was placed in an ultrasound bath (35 kHz) for 5 s. The ultrasound energy transfer into the sample (Delta W=3.77 J) was calculated using the average temperature increase (averaged by 0.935 degrees C) of the sample. Platelet aggregation was quantified immediately after stimulation with ultrasound or adenosine diphosphate (ADP 2.1 and 4.2 microM) by the Myrenne Aggregometer PA2 at low (40 s(-1)) and afterwards at high (2500 s(-1)) shear. To evaluate the influence of lipoproteins, seven healthy male volunteers were investigated before and after a fat load (50 g fat per m(2) body surface), and 11 patients suffering from hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic disease before and after a single low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation was well correlated with platelet aggregation after ADP (r between 0.50 and 0.95). However, when exposed to high shear, the low shear-induced platelet aggregates were more stable after ultrasound stimulation compared with ADP stimulation either with or without tirofiban. After the fat load triglyceride concentration increased from 0.86+/-0.39 to 2.10+/-1.10 mmol l(-1) (P<0.05) resulting in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak (ADP 2.1 microM) but not after strong (ADP 4.2 microM or ultrasound) stimuli. After a single LDL apheresis LDL cholesterol dropped from 3.99+/-0.90 to 1.06+/-0.55 mmol l(-1) (P<0.005). No changes in platelet aggregation were observed with the exception of a lower aggregation when exposed to high shear after stimulation with 2.1 microM ADP. In conclusion, we found the ultrasound stimulation of platelet-rich plasma easy to perform. The platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation correlated well with stimulation after ADP. While a reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration had only slight effects on platelet aggregation, an increase in triglyceride concentration resulted in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak stimulation.