Lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir in salvage therapy; pharmacokinetics,tolerability and efficacy

Patients receiving a lopinavir/ritonavir and saquinavir dual protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral salvage regimen were studied to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy of the regimen. Pharmacokinetic curves were obtained for lopinavir and saquinavir. Patient records were studied for adverse events and efficacy data. The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and saquinavir were comparable with literature data, except for the saquinavir 0-12 h area under the curve and maximum concentration. The tolerability of the regimen was good and efficacy was encouraging.     

Efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir as salvage regimen after ritonavir or indinavir failure

The high rate of protease inhibitor treatment failure in clinical cohorts makes it necessary to define novel salvage therapies. In a prospective study of 31 HIV-infected patients included in a salvage regimen with stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir, viral load decreased a median of 1.65 log(10) and 1.95 log(10) after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, and 35 and 56% of patients had an HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at the same time points. At baseline, the mean number of mutations in the protease gene was 10 (2-19), and the V82A and L90M mutations were present in 54 and 21% of patients. The presence of the V82A mutation did not affect significantly the rate of response (36 vs. 38%), whereas the L90M mutation was associated with treatment failure (0 vs. 43%). Plasma trough levels of nelfinavir (NFV) and saquinavir (SQV), in a twice daily dosing regimen, were above the protein-corrected IC(95) in most patients despite the addition of an enzymatic inducer such as nevirapine, and peak levels were 2- and 5-fold increased with respect to standard doses. However, pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-hard gel capsule (SQV-hgc) did not improve significantly in the three times daily dosing regimen. In conclusion, the combination of stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir increased plasma drug levels and produced an adequate virological response in patients who had failed indinavir or ritonavir therapy. This degree of response is not significantly decreased in the presence of genotypic mutations associated with indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) resistance.     

Changes in CD4 lymphocyte counts after interruption of therapy in patients with viral failure on protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine

OBJECTIVE: To describe the short-term changes in CD4 lymphocyte counts after the interruption of antiretroviral HIV therapy in order to increase the understanding of CD4 lymphocyte dynamics, and so that appropriate monitoring strategies can be designed. METHODS: We studied 35 HIV-infected patients with late-stage disease who had therapy interruptions leading to high viral load levels, median greater than 750 000 RNA log10 copies/ml, and in whom two CD4 cell counts (median 28 days apart) were available before beginning a salvage regimen. RESULTS: Overall, there was a substantial decline in CD4 cell counts from a median of 125 to 83 cells/mm3 in the average 28 day period, with median proportionate and absolute losses of 26% and 24 cells/mm3 per month, respectively (P < 0.008). This tended to be greater in individuals studied sooner after interrupting therapy (P = 0.03) and in those with CD4 cell counts above the pre-therapy baseline (P = 0.06). There was a strong negative correlation between the proportionate increase in viral load and the absolute change in CD4 cell count (-0.66, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Patients with relatively advanced HIV infection interrupting antiretroviral therapy after failing a protease inhibitor-containing regimen require frequent monitoring because CD4 cell counts appear to fall quite rapidly, at least in the first few weeks after interruption.     

Decreased exposure to saquinavir in HIV-1-infected patients after long-term antiretroviral therapy including ritonavir and saquinavir

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and saquinavir change during long-term treatment in HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment including ritonavir and saquinavir. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and saquinavir were assessed during an 8-h period on two occasions in six HIV-1 infected patients on stable twice daily treatment with ritonavir 400 mg, saquinavir 400 mg and stavudine 40 mg with or without lamivudine 150 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The first study day was 4-12 months (median 7 months) after the start of the current regimen. The second study day was 9-15 months (median 10 months) later. No significant differences were observed for the ritonavir pharmacokinetics between the first and second study day. However, median change in plasma trough level of saquinavir between the two study days was -30% (range -79 to +11%; P = 0.06). Median change in maximum plasma concentration was -40% (range -62 to +34%; P = 0.09). The median change in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over 0-8 h was -33% (range -53 to +21%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The exposure to saquinavir decreased over time in HIV-infected patients on stable antiretroviral therapy. These data suggest that regular monitoring of plasma drug concentrations should become part of routine patient care even in apparently compliant patients.     

Mechanisms of early virologic failure in antiretroviral-naive patients starting protease inhibitor-containing regimens: the APROVIR Study

The virologic and pharmacologic mechanisms of virologic failure (VF) were studied in 243 antiretroviral-naive patients starting first-line protease inhibitor (PI)-containing therapy (nelfinavir in 66% and indinavir in 19%). Among the 220 patients with follow-up data, VF occurred in 35 (16%) during the first year of follow-up. A higher baseline virus load and poorer adherence to therapy were associated with VF. At the time of VF, key PI-resistance mutations were detected in 11 (48%) of 23 patients who started on nelfinavir but were absent in 6 patients with indinavir treatment failure. PI plasma levels were more often below the range of active concentrations in VF with wild-type viruses (74%) than in VF with PI-resistant viruses (25%; P=.02). The mechanisms of early VF and of selection of PI-resistant viruses differed by type of PI and were dependent on PI plasma levels.     

Combined therapy with saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected protease inhibitor-naive patients

¹ Basel Centre for HIV Research, Outpatient Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, ² Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, ³ Department of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital Lugano, ⁴ Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, ⁵ Basel Centre for HIV Research, Institute for Medical Microbiology, University Basel, ⁶ Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bern, ⁷ Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Lausanne, ⁸ Roche Pharma AG, Reinach, and ⁹ Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland Objective To assess the short‐term and long‐term effect of a combination of saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed protease inhibitor‐naive patients. Design Prospective open‐label multicentre study. Patients and Methods A total of 64 protease inhibitor‐naive and stavudine‐naive HIV‐infected patients with a CD4 count of < 250 cells/μL and > 10 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL received saquinavir hard‐gelatin capsules, ritonavir and stavudine. Full (drop in viraemia of > 2 log₁₀ and/or < 500 copies/mL) and partial responders (drop to between 500 and 5000 viraemia copies/mL) at week 9 (end of phase I) entered the second phase (additional 12‐month period). Results Fifty‐six patients completed phase I, 45 (70%) full responders and nine (14%) partial responders by intent‐to‐treat analysis. Thirty‐nine patients completed phase II, 33 (52%) full responders and two (3%) partial responders. Six patients had < 50 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL at week 9, and 20 (31%) patients at month 12 of phase II. Mean CD4 cell counts increased significantly in the 56 patients from 89 to 184 cells/μL after 9 weeks and from 100 to 292 cells/μL in the 39 patients treated for another 12 months. Higher baseline viraemia and lower baseline CD4 cell counts were not associated with an unfavourable virological response at week 9 and month 12 of phase II. HIV DNA in peripheral blood monocytes decreased substantially (? 1.5 log₁₀) but was detectable in all except one patient at the end of phase II. Conclusion In protease‐ and stavudine‐naive HIV‐infected patients with moderate to severe immunosuppression, saquinavir in combination with ritonavir and stavudine caused a substantial long‐term decrease in plasma viral load in approximately half the participants and a substantial increase in CD4 cell counts.     

Combination therapy containing ritonavir plus saquinavir has superior short-term antiretroviral efficacy: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of indinavir 800 mg three times a day, ritonavir 600 mg twice a day, and a combination of ritonavir 400 mg twice a day and saquinavir 400 mg twice a day, when administered with two nucleoside analogues. DESIGN: A randomized, open-labelled, controlled trial. Two hundred and eighty-four patients started randomized treatment. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less (Roche Amplicor) and HIV RNA of 20 copies/ml or less (Roche ultradirect assay) at 6 months. Analysis was performed as intent-to-treat, and missing values were accounted for as failures. RESULTS: As of 1 May 1998, 269 patients should have completed 24 weeks of treatment. The proportion of patients with HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less was 71% (indinavir), 67% (ritonavir), and 82% (ritonavir + saquinavir), P = 0.07. In antiretroviral drug-naive patients (n = 119), the corresponding figures were 63, 57, and 89% (P < 0.01), whereas among drug-experienced patients (n = 165) 77, 74, and 77% had HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less (P = 0.90). The same pattern was observed in the ultradirect analysis. All three regimens were generally safe, but significantly more patients in the ritonavir group (37%) stopped treatment because of adverse drug reactions compared with the indinavir group (8%) and the ritonavir plus saquinavir group (16%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with saquinavir plus ritonavir in combination with two nucleoside analogues is generally safe, and has superior short-term antiviral efficacy compared with indinavir and ritonavir also combined with two nucleoside analogues in antiretroviral drug-naive patients. Further follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the viral response.     

Predictive factors of virological success to salvage regimens containing protease inhibitors in HIV-1 infected children

Background  

The impact of HIV drug resistance mutations in salvage therapy has been widely investigated in adults. By contrast, data available of predictive value of resistance mutations in pediatric population is scarce.     

Efficacy of a five-drug combination including ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz in patients who failed on a conventional triple-drug regimen: phenotypic resistance to protease inhibitors predicts outcome of therapy.

OBJECTIVE: to assess the safety and efficacy of a combination of ritonavir, efavirenz and two recycled nucleosides in patients who failed on a conventional triple-drug regimen including indinavir or ritonavir. METHODS: An open label study of ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), saquinavir (1000 mg twice daily), efavirenz (600 mg per day) and nucleoside analogues in 32 saquinavir- and efavirenz-naive protease inhibitor-experienced patients. Patients were included on the basis of plasma levels of HIV RNA above 5000 copies/ml while on conventional antiretroviral therapy. Phenotypic resistance and genotypic resistance mutations to saquinavir were assessed at baseline. Peak and trough plasma levels of saquinavir were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Median CD4 cell counts and median plasma HIV RNA at baseline were 258 x 10(6)/l and 4.31 log10 copies/ml, respectively. The plasma viral load decreased by a median of 1.20 log10 copies/ml and the CD4 cell count increased by a median 60 x 10(6) cells/l at week 24 of therapy. Seventy-one per cent of the patients achieved a plasma viral load < 500 copies/ml and 45% achieved a viral load < 50 copies/ml. Patients exhibiting phenotypic resistance to saquinavir at baseline experienced a median decrease in HIV RNA of 0.91 log10 copies/ml at week 24 of therapy, as compared with a decrease of 1.52 log10 copies/ml in those exhibiting sensitive viral strains (P = 0.03). Genotypic resistance to saquinavir was not predictive of virologic failure. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the combination of ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz is safe and effective at 24 weeks in over two-thirds of patients who previously failed on highly active antiretroviral therapy, and that the determination of phenotypic resistance may be of greater value than the detection of resistance mutations to predict the outcome of salvage therapy in this setting.     

Determinants of paradoxical CD4 cell reconstitution after protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the parameters influencing CD4 cell reconstitution after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapies in real life, as well as the frequency and the determinants of the discrepancies occurring between virus and CD4 cell count evolution. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 317 pre-treated patients starting a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen were prospectively followed for 2 years on an intent-to-treat basis for CD4 cell counts and viral loads. RESULTS: The CD4 cell counts rapidly increased from baseline (50/mm3) by a median of 50/mm3 at month 2 (+0.72 CD4 cells/mm3/day) and up to 137/mm3 at the last follow-up (second slope: +0.16 CD4 cells/mm3/day). Two independent major factors among five parameters tested significantly affected the first phase, which was negatively correlated to the slope of CD4 cell decline before PI initiation, and was positively correlated to baseline CD4 cell counts (P = 0.0001); the second phase was mostly affected by the mean viral load reduction over time (P = 0.0001). Paradoxical CD4 cell reconstitution (15% of cases) was defined by a rapid or slow CD4 cell increase contrasting with a minor or strong viral reduction, respectively. The role of previous CD4 cell decline and the low effect of viral load reduction during the first 2 months explain the early paradoxical CD4 cell responses. The major influence of viral load reduction on the long-term reconstitution, however, reduces such paradoxical responses at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Early paradoxical CD4 cell reconstitution after the introduction of a PI are explained by the major influence of previous disease progression on the early CD4 cell increase, whereas the magnitude of viral load reduction over time reduces such paradoxical evolutions in the long term.