Incidence and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is due to many risk factors, but its pathogenesis is still not clearly understood. To identify the risk factors for PVT, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and complications associated with PVT in cir-rhotic patients.
METHODS: We studied patients with liver cirrhosis who were admitted to our unit from April 2009 to December 2014. The patients were divided into the PVT and non-PVT groups, and were compared by variables including gender, age, the etiology of cirrhosis, stage of cirrhosis, complications, imaging, and treatment.
RESULTS: PVT was found in 45 (9.8%) of 461 cirrhotic pa-tients admitted to our hospital. Most patients (45.9%) had hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis, with a similar dis-tribution of etiologies between the groups. However, there was no positive relationship between PVT and etiologies of cirrhosis. Most patients (71.5%) were in the stage of hepatic decompensation. No statistically signiifcant differences were found in complications including esophageal varices, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy between the groups. However, there was a signiifcant positive correlation between hepatocel-lular carcinoma (HCC) and PVT (P<0.01). In 30 patients with PVT, thrombosis occurred in the portal vein and/or portal branches, 37.8% were diagnosed on ultrasound.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PVT was 9.8%, mainly in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis. The development of PVT was associated with the severity of liver disease and HCC.     

肝硬化患者门静脉血栓形成危险因素的Logistic回归分析

目的研究肝硬化患者门静脉血栓（PVT）形成的相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析我院消化内科2007—2008年确诊的肝硬化患者80例,其中19例肝硬化PVT患者作为血栓组,61例肝硬化非血栓患者作为对照组,收集相关临床资料,对可能影响PVT形成的因素进行单因素分析和Logistic回归模型分析。结果Logistic回归模型分析结果显示,血浆D-二聚体、门静脉宽度（MPV）、血小板（PLT）是肝硬化患者PVT形成的独立危险因素（P值分别为0.003、0.012、0.036）。结论肝硬化患者应注意监测血浆D-二聚体、门静脉宽度、血小板等指标,以便早期预防和发现PVT的形成。     

Tumor and liver determinants of prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A case cohort study

Background and Aims:  A total of 967 patients with unresectable and untransplantable, biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were prospectively evaluated at baseline and followed up till death.
Methods:  Survival was the end-point for all analyses.
Results:  We found in our overall analysis, that male gender, ascites, cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or bilirubin or alkaline phosphatases were each statistically significant adverse prognostic factors. Patients with normal AFP survived longer than those with elevated AFP, in the presence of PVT, large or bilobar tumors or cirrhosis. We used a bivariate analysis to separate patient subgroups based on poor liver function and aggressive tumor characteristics. In subgroup analysis based on these subsets, there was clear discrimination in survival between subsets; in addition both cirrhosis and presence of PVT were significant, independent but modest risk factors. The results of this large dataset show that amongst nonsurgical HCC patients, there are clear subsets with longer survival than other subsets.
Conclusions:  This data also supports the concept of heterogeneity of HCC.     

门静脉血栓形成对肝硬化病程发展影响

目的探讨门静脉血栓（PVT）形成对肝硬化病程的影响。方法回顾我院2003年～2011年肝硬化伴PVT形成的患者资料。18例肝硬化伴PVT形成患者人选血栓组;随机选择同阶段肝硬化门静脉高压症的无门静脉血栓形成患者19例作为对照组,比较两组患者的门静脉宽度、脾脏厚度、食管胃底静脉曲张、腹水及上消化道大出血发生等情况。结果血栓组的门静脉宽度及脾脏厚度大于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。血栓组食管胃底重度静脉曲张、上消化道大出血和大量腹水比例两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论脾肿大和门静脉增宽是PVT形成的主要危险因素,PVT形成加重门静脉高压的程度,从而增加上消化道出血几率,使腹水难以消退,增加相关并发症发生率并使相关症状加重,预防门静脉血栓形成有助于延缓肝硬化病情发展。     

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This systematic review sought to examine the role of TACE in the treatment of HCC with PVT in either the main portal vein (MPV) or portal vein branches (PVB).

肝硬化门静脉血栓形成的危险因素

门静脉血栓(PVT)在肝硬化患者中较常见,合并PVT的静脉曲张更容易出血,止血失败率及再出血率更高,对于肝移植患者,其预后更差。目前PVT形成的相关危险因素较多,如肝功能严重程度、非选择性β受体阻滞剂的使用、门静脉血流速度等。重点对肝硬化PVT形成的危险因素进行综述,以进一步了解PVT形成的相关机制和PVT的危险程度。     

MTHFR C677TT, PAI1 4G-4G, V Leiden Q506, and prothrombin G20210A in hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis

We studied thrombophilic genetic factors (TGFs) MTHFR C677TT, PAI1 4G-4G, V Leiden Q506, prothrombin G20210A as risk factors in 94 patients with HCC with and without portal vein thrombosis (PVT), compared with 214 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) with and without PVT and 94 healthy controls (HC). The OR (95% CI) for MTHFR C677TT with HCC was 3.85 (1.55–7.39) vs. HC. The OR for PAI1 4G-4G in HCC, was 2.87 (1.27–6.55) vs. HC. Also prothrombin G20210A was significantly more frequent among HCC, mainly in patients with PVT, while V Leiden factor was equally distributed among HCC and HC. Differences were more significant in patients with associated PVT. These findings suggest that frequently TGFs are needed for patients to be at risk of HCC and PVT. We conclude that in all patients with chronic liver disease TGF screening should be performed to individuate patients at risk of HCC and PVT.     

Treatment Outcomes of Helical Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims

This study reports treatment outcomes after helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients for whom transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was considered ineffective or unsuitable.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2011, 22 unresectable HCC patients received helical IMRT. A daily dose of 1.8 to 4 Gy was delivered at five fractions per week to deliver a total dose of 30 to 60 Gy. The most-prescribed dose fractionation was a total dose of 50 to 57.5 Gy, with a daily dose of 2.3 to 2.5 Gy.

Results

In the entire group, the objective response rate of the primary tumor was 72.7%. In the eight patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), the objective response rate of PVT was 50.0%. Median disease progression-free survival was 11.8 months, and the 1-year disease progression-free survival rate was 40.2%. The median overall survival was 14.4 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86.4% and 69.1%, respectively. PVT and Child-Pugh classifications were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions

Helical IMRT in patients with unresectable HCC resulted in high treatment response and survival rates. This study suggests helical IMRT is a practical treatment option for HCC patients in whom TACE is unsuitable or ineffective.     

Study of portal vein thrombosis in patients with idiopathic portal hypertension in Japan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and clinical manifestations of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) in Japan during long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with IPH were examined for PVT by sonography during a follow-up of 12+/-6 years. Clinical manifestations and patient outcome related to PVT were studied. Seventy patients with liver cirrhosis were examined by sonography as an incidence control of thrombosis. RESULTS: Nine IPH patients had portal thrombosis (9/22, 41%), a higher incidence than in liver cirrhosis patients (7/70, 10%). Those with thrombosis showed ascites, marked hypersplenism, and low serum albumin. Four patients with thrombosis died. Patients without thrombosis showed less clinical problems after long-term follow-up. Plasma antithrombin III and protein C activity decreased in almost half of the patients. However, there were no differences in these parameters between patients with and without thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, IPH patients had a high incidence of portal thrombosis, a significant factor for poor prognosis. Whether the management of PVT contributes to an improvement of a clinical course of IPH or not should be clarified in further study.     

Risk factors and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis is usually associated to hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical presentation of non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhotic patients has not been specifically studied and risk factors of PVT in this group of patients are still poorly understood. METHODS: We studied all patients with PVT and liver cirrhosis admitted to our Unit from January 1998 to December 2002. They were paired (by gender, age and Child-Pugh score) to a group of cirrhotic patients without PVT and screened for acquired and inherited thrombophilic risk factors. These factors together with the site of thrombosis and the severity of the liver disease were correlated to the clinical presentation of PVT. RESULTS: Out of a total of 701 cirrhotic patients admitted to our hospital and routinely screened with Doppler ultrasound, 79 (11.2%) were found to have PVT. Of these, 34 (43%) were asymptomatic and 45 (57%) were symptomatic (31 presented with portal hypertensive bleed and 14 with abdominal pain, 10 of whom had intestinal infarction). Mesenteric vein involvement was never asymptomatic and lead to intestinal ischemia or infarction. Most patients were in class Child-Pugh B and C. Among thrombophilic risk factors studied only the mutation 20210 of the prothrombin gene resulted independently associated to PVT. CONCLUSIONS: Portal vein thrombosis may be completely asymptomatic in patients with liver cirrhosis; however in more than half of cases presents with life-threatening complications such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage and intestinal infarction. Cirrhotic patients with PVT usually have an advanced liver disease and the presence of the mutation 20210 of the prothrombin gene increases more than fivefold the risk of PVT.     

乙肝肝硬化患者门静脉宽度与门静脉血栓形成的关系

背景门静脉血栓(portal vein thrombosis,PVT)的早期诊断仍是临床上一个难题,急需要发现可早期预测诊断的无创指标.目的探讨门静脉宽度与PVT形成之间的关系.方法收集418例乙肝肝硬化患者.根据是否发生PVT分为PVT组(n=66)和非PVT组(n=352)组.比较两组患者的一般资料差异,使用多因素Logistic回顾分析影响PVT发生的危险因素.通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估不同危险因素预测PVT的效能.结果与非PVT组患者相比,PVT组患者的Child-Pugh评分更高、Child-Pugh A级比例更低、血小板水平更高、D-二聚体水平更高、门静脉宽度更宽、门静脉血流更慢,上述差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05).Logistic回归显示门静脉宽度(OR=3.941,P=0.001)、门静脉血流(OR=0.841,P=0.007)、血小板水平(OR=1.024,P=0.008)和D-二聚体水平(OR=2.383,P=0.000)是肝硬化患者发生PVT的独立危险因素.门静脉宽度诊断PVT的ROC曲线下面积最大为0.874,最佳诊断值为>12.5 mm,此时的预测敏感性和特异性分别为78%和82%.结论门静脉直径增加是肝硬化患者PVT发生的危险因素,对PVT诊断具有一定价值.     

Acute pancreatitis complicated with transient portal venous thrombosis in one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis

Portal venous thrombosis (PVT) is a condition associated with high morbidity. The etiologies of PVT include intra-abdominal inflammation or infection, surgical intervention, abdominal malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic carcinoma, or abnormality in coagulation caused by various reasons such as liver cirrhosis. Management of PVT should be based on its etiology and the condition of the patient. We describe a cirrhotic patient with HCC who suffered from acute pancreatitis. PVT in the main trunk was detected at admission due to the episode of acute pancreatitis. The etiology of thrombosis was considered to be inflammation around the main portal trunk caused by pancreatitis rather than cirrhosis or HCC. We did not instigate any management for the thrombosis. Acute pancreatitis was relieved after conservative treatment. Follow-up imaging study performed 46 days after detection of thrombosis showed spontaneous complete resolution of the thrombus. Our experience may provide useful information for the management of such patients.     

Portal vein thrombosis in a patient with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis complicated with antiphospholipid syndrome

We report a rare case of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. A 59-year-old woman with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was admitted because of coma. The blood test showed a typically cirrhosis pattern including an elevated serum ammonia level. Abdominal computed tomography showed liver cirrhosis and thrombus in the right branch of the portal vein. To elucidate the cause of PVT, antiphospholipid antibodies were examined. Both IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody (ELISA) and IgG anti-cardiolipin-β2 -glycoprotein I complex antibody (ELISA) were positive. When PVT is detected in a patient with cirrhosis, it might be necessary to examine antiphospholipid antibodies to clarify the cause of PVT.     

肝硬化门静脉血栓无创性预测模型的研究

目的建立由血清指标和腹部B超组成的无创性诊断模型来预测肝硬化患者门静脉血栓（PVT）的形成。方法回顾性分析我院消化内科2007年1月～2010年1月确诊的肝硬化患者280例,随机抽取166例作为模型组,84例作为验证组,均行腹部螺旋CT增强扫描以了解有无门静脉血栓形成。记录患者肝硬化病因、年龄、性别以及入院后腹部B超和实验室常用指标,包括血常规、生化、凝血酶原时间、门静脉内径、脾脏厚度等参数。在模型组,对指标依次行单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析,筛选出相应的独立预测因子,在此基础上构建肝硬化门静脉血栓的指数模型,最后在独立的验证组中检验模型的诊断效率。结果模型组建立了一个由血浆D-二聚体、门静脉内径（MPV）、血小板（PLT）三项指标组成的综合指数模型（PVT index）。受试者工作曲线（ROC）分析显示PVT index值为7.2时,其预测肝硬化门静脉血栓形成的ROC曲线下面积（AUC）为0.864（0.753,0.946）,诊断敏感性为82.1%,特异性为86.7%,阳性预测值为93.53%,阴性预测值为64.58%,诊断精确性为81.77%。将PVT index以同样标准应用于验证组,ROC曲线下面积为0.886（0.785,0.962）,诊断精确性为82.16%。结论由血浆D-二聚体、门静脉内径、血小板等指标构建的无创性预测模型有助于早期预防和发现PVT的形成。     

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter selective superior mesenteric artery urokinase infusion therapy vs transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis and acute portal vein thrombosis

AIM To compare the outcomes of transcatheter superior mesenteric artery(SMA) urokinase infusion and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) for acute portal vein thrombosis(PVT) in cirrhosis.METHODS From January 2013 to December 2014, patients with liver cirrhosis and acute symptomatic PVT who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either an SMA group or a TIPS group. The two groups accepted transcatheter selective SMA urokinase infusion therapyand TIPS, respectively. The total follow-up time was24 mo. The primary outcome measure was the change in portal vein patency status which was evaluated by angio-computed tomography or Doppler ultrasound.Secondary outcomes were rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy.RESULTS A total of 40 patients were enrolled, with 20 assigned to the SMA group and 20 to the TIPS group. The symptoms of all patients in the two groups improved within 48 h. PVT was improved in 17(85%) patients in the SMA group and 14(70%) patients in the TIPS group. The main portal vein(MPV) thrombosis was significantly reduced in both groups(P 0.001), and there was no significant difference between them(P= 0.304). In the SMA group, superior mesenteric vein(SMV) thrombosis and splenic vein(SV) thrombosis were significantly reduced(P = 0.048 and P = 0.02),which did not occur in the TIPS group. At 6-, 12-,and 24-mo follow-up, in the SMA group and the TIPS group, the cumulative rates free of the first episode of rebleeding were 80%, 65%, and 45% vs 90%, 80%,and 60%, respectively(P = 0.320); the cumulative rates free of the first episode of hepatic encephalopathy were 85%, 80%, and 65% vs 50%, 40%, and 35%,respectively(P = 0.022).CONCLUSION Transcatheter selective SMA urokinase infusion and TIPS are safe and effective for acute symptomatic PVT in cirrhosis.     

Splanchnic and Extrasplanchnic Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: Prophylaxis vs Treatment

Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occur in up to 6.3 % and 15.9 % of patients with cirrhosis, respectively. There is recent evidence that a procoagulable prothrombotic state is related to cirrhosis despite the reduced levels of many coagulation factors, and decreased platelet counts. Indeed, (i) the combination of high levels of factor VIII, with low levels of protein C and antithrombin induces a procoagulant state in vitro; while (ii) increased levels of von Willebrand factor and decreased ADAMTS 13 activity can compensate for decreased platelet counts. PVT is partial in a majority of patients in whom it develops and may spontaneously resolve in some of them. Although PVT is associated with features of more severe liver disease, it is uncertain whether it plays a causal role in the decompensation of cirrhosis. In patients listed for liver transplantation, PVT may make the procedure difficult or impossible. Pre-transplant PVT is associated with increased post-transplant mortality rates. Studies evaluating clinical outcome of anticoagulation therapy for splanchnic or extrasplanchnic venous thrombosis are scarce. Anticoagulation therapy, given to patients with cirrhosis of intermediate severity before PVT occurrence, in prophylactic doses, appears to decrease decompensation and mortality rate. Interestingly, this improvement is out of proportion of the prophylaxis of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. The risk of bleeding does not seem to be increased in patients with cirrhosis receiving anticoagulation therapy, once prophylaxis for bleeding related to portal hypertension has been implemented. Overall, the room for anticoagulation therapy is probably larger than previously recognized, and may be of particular benefit in patients without portal vein thrombosis. However, clinical trials remain to be done before the benefit risk ratio of anticoagulation therapy is properly evaluated.     

肝硬化并发门静脉血栓患者临床特征及其危险因素分析

目的 总结肝硬化并发门静脉血栓(PVT)患者的临床特征并分析PVT形成的危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2015年2月～2019年2月我院肝胆包虫科治疗的160例肝硬化患者,分析比较PVT组与未发生PVT组患者临床资料的差异,采用多因素分析发生PVT的危险因素。结果 80例PVT患者腹痛、腹水和消化道出血发生率、血小板(PLT)和白细胞(WBC)计数显著高于80例未发生PVT组(P<0.05);经多因素分析,发现PLT计数、糖尿病史和脾切除史为肝硬化并发门静脉血栓形成的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 肝硬化并发PVT患者以HGB、PLT、WBC为主要实验室表现,以腹水、下消化道出血、肝功异常为主要临床症状。PLT、糖尿病史和脾切除史为肝硬化并发门静脉血栓的独立危险因素。     

External beam radiation therapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor impact on prognosis. Many of these tumors may cause intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases. From January 1991 to December 1996, 41 unresectable HCC patients with PVT underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the portion of PVT. The irradiated field, with a mean equivalent field size of 6.6 x 7.1 cm2, was localized and simulated by abdominal sonography, angiography and computed tomography. Radiation dose ranged from 36 to 66 Gy (mean dose: 51.4 Gy), in a daily fraction of 1.8 to 2 Gy. The response of EBRT was evaluated by abdominal sonography within 3 months of completion of EBRT. The response rates of the PVT after treatment were 39% for complete response (CR), 41% for partial response (PR), and 19% for no response (NR), respectively. The median overall survival time from start of radiotherapy was 10 months for all patients, 17 months for CR patients, 8 months for PR patients and 4 months for NR patients. By multivariate analysis, response of PVT resulted in a significant improvement in survival. (P = 0.001) There was no occurrence of severe complication of radiation-induced liver disease. The results obtained with combined treatment modality of EBRT and TACE in the treatment of HCC patients with PVT are encouraging.     

脾切除术与TIPS术治疗肝硬化患者门静脉血栓发生率比较*

目的 比较脾切除术与经颈静脉肝内门腔静脉内支架分流术(TIPS)治疗肝硬化患者门静脉血栓(PVT)发生率的差异。方法 2017年1月～2018年12月兰州大学第一医院诊治的肝硬化并发脾功能亢进症患者96例,其中接受脾切除者45例,接受TIPS术治疗者51例。术后随访12个月,使用腹部超声或CT或CTA检查诊断PVT。应用Kaplan-Meier法计算PVT累计发生率。结果 在术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月,脾切除术组PVT累计发生率分别为40.0%、46.7%、48.9%和48.9%,显著高于TIPS术组(分别为7.8%、9.8%、15.7%和21.6%,P<0.05);在接受脾切除术患者,基线指标比较发现PVT组门静脉主干直径显著大于非PVT组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);在TIPS术后1年,发生PVT患者11例(21.6%)。基线指标比较,未发现发生与未发生PVT组各指标具有统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 在肝硬化并发脾功能亢进症患者,接受脾切除术后PVT累计发生率显著高于TIPS术。因此,术前应认真评估病情,严格掌握适应证,择优选择手术方法,并积极给予防治处理。     

Case reports of portal vein thrombosis and bile duct stenosis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate portal vein and bile duct toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively reviewed 63 patients who were administrated SBRT once for HCC. The prescribed doses were from 48 Gy in four fractions to 60 Gy in eight fractions. Portal vein thrombosis and bile duct stenosis were evaluated. The dose received by 2% of the volume (D₂) of the portal vein and bile duct was calculated. Portal vein thrombosis was observed in three patients (4.8%). Common points of these patients were Child–Pugh class B and D₂ of the portal vein 40 Gy or more (BED₃ ≥200 Gy). Bile duct stenosis was observed in one patient (1.6%). The patient had a history of cholangiocarcinoma and left hepatic lobectomy. Portal vein thrombosis may be necessary to be considered when SBRT for HCC is administrated to patients in higher Child–Pugh class with higher D₂ of the portal vein.