Percutaneous transhepatic catheterization of the portal venous system

During recent years, percutaneous transhepatic catheterization of the portal venous system has become the most accurate procedure for investigation of the portal system. The procedure can be performed under local analgesia, is relatively simple, and complications are rare. The success rate is high, approximately 90%, especially when the liver hilum is localized by ultrasonography prior to catheterization. The free portal pressure can be measured. Selective catheterization of all portal tributaries can be performed. The indications are: portography in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and portal hypertension for delineation of collateral vein systems including gastro-oesophageal varices; visualization of veins that may be used for portosystemic shunt operations; postoperative control of shunt patency; diagnosis of portal and hepatic vein thrombosis; localization of stenosis in the portal vein system; pre-operative evaluation of patients with tumours in the biliary tract and pancreas; obliteration of bleeding oesophageal varices; and verification and localization of endocrine pancreatic tumours making curative resection possible. Further, transhepatic catheterization of the portal system may be used in research on the development of portal hypertension, collateral veins, variceal bleeding, and for haemodynamic, metabolic and pharmacologic studies in the gastrointestinal tract.     

Effects of Dobutamine on Hepatosplanchnic Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Kawasaki T, Moriyasu F, Kimura T, Someda H, Hamato N, Okuma M. Effects of dobutamine on hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics in patients with chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29:1044-1054.

Background: It is said that catecholamines increase hepatic blood flow in patients without liver diseases, although several reports have suggested a blunted response to catecholamines in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Methods: We investigated changes in splanchnic blood flow distribution induced by the infusion of dobutamine into peripheral veins of healthy adults (NC group), patients with chronic hepatitis (CH group), and patients with liver cirrhosis (LC group), using a Doppler duplex system (protocol 1). We also investigated changes in hepatic hemodynamics induced by dobutamine infusion in patients with liver cirrhosis (cirrhosis group) and patients without liver diseases (control group), using hepatic catheterization (protocol 2).

Results: In protocol 1 the average increase in portal venous blood flow during dobutamine infusion was significant in the NC and CH groups but was not significant in the LC group. Changes in the blood flow in the splenic artery and vein, superior mesenteric artery and vein, and femoral artery were similar to those in the portal vein in each of the three groups. Infusion did not cause a change in the common hepatic arterial flow in any of the three groups. In protocol 2 the portal venous flow, cardiac index, and hepatic venous pressure gradient increased significantly during dobutamine infusion in both the cirrhosis and the control groups. Hepatic vascular resistance in the cirrhosis group increased slightly, whereas, in contrast, that in the control group increased significantly. The rate of change in almost all variables was lower in the cirrhosis group than in the control group.

Conclusion: These results indicate that dobutamine has less effect on hepatic circulation in patients with liver cirrhosis than in those without liver diseases, indicating that the value of dobutamine in increasing hepatic blood flow in cirrhotic patients is very limited.     

Combined liver vein and spleen pulp pressure measurements in patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Patients with thrombosis of the portal or splenic vein may develop portal hypertension with bleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices. The relevant portal pressure cannot be measured by liver vein catheterization or transhepatic puncture of the portal vein because the obstruction is peripheral to the accessible part of the portal system. METHODS: Liver vein catheterization was combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement in 10 patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis and no cirrhosis, and 10 cirrhotic patients without thrombosis. The splenic pressure was measured by percutaneous puncture below the curvature of the ribs with an angle of the needle to skin of 30 degrees in order to minimize the risk of cutting the spleen if the patient took a deep breath. RESULTS: None of the patients in whom the described procedure was followed had complications. Pressure measurements in the spleen pulp and splenic vein were concordant. The pressure gradient across the portal venous system (splenic-to-wedged hepatic vein pressure) was -1.3 to 8.5 mmHg (median, 2.8 mmHg) in cirrhosis patients and 0-44 mmHg (median, 18 mmHg) in thrombosis patients, the variation reflecting various degrees of obstruction to flow in the portal venous system. Peripheral portal pressure (splenic-to-free liver vein pressure gradient) was 1.1-28 mmHg (median, 17 mmHg) in cirrhotic patients and 11-52 mmHg (median, 23 mmHg) in thrombosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Liver vein catheterization combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement is feasible in quantifying pressure gradient across a thrombosis of the portal/splenic vein and in quantifying portal pressure peripheral to this kind of thrombosis.     

Clinical value of hepatic vein catheterization. Improved pracability by balloon catheter technique

Techniques of hepatic vein catheterization, hepatic venous pressure measurement, and occlusion phlebography using a balloon catheter are described. Hepatic venous pressure measurements (n=95) and hepatic occlusion phlebography were combined in 32 cases. In patients with liver cirrhosis (n=63) a significant elevation of hepatic venous pressure gradients was found. A decrease of the pressure gradient was seen after portacaval and splenorenal shunt operations. Hepatic occlusion phlebography showed alterations of hepatic veins only in patients with cirrhosis. A rough correlation between pressure gradients and the extent of changes in the liver veins was found. Hepatic occlusion phlebography, in patients who had undergone shunt procedure, demonstrated various collaterals. Combined hepatic vein pressure measurements and hepatic occlusion phlebography using a balloon catheter are proposed as a very suitable method for the evaluation of chronic liver disease and portal hypertension.     

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonography and the hepatic venous pressure gradient in assessing portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This prospective study aimed to determine whether Doppler ultrasonography can represent the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as an assessment of the severity of portal hypertension and the response to terlipressin, which reduces the portal pressure in liver cirrhosis. METHODS: The HVPG and the Doppler ultrasonographic parameters, such as the portal venous velocity and the splenic venous velocity, the pulsatility and the resistive index of the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries were measured in 138 patients with liver cirrhosis. The changes in the HVPG and the portal venous velocity after administering terlipressin were evaluated in 43 of the 138 patients. The patients who showed a reduction in the HVPG of more than 20% of the baseline were defined as responders to terlipressin. RESULTS: None of the Doppler ultrasonographic parameters correlated with the HVPG. Both the HVPG (28.0 +/- 19.8%) and the portal venous velocity (29.7 +/- 13.2%) showed a significant reduction after terlipressin administration. However, the portal venous velocity decreased significantly, not only in the responders (31.0 +/- 12.0%) but also in the non-responders (25.2 +/- 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Doppler ultrasonography does not represent the HVPG, and is therefore not suitable for replacing HVPG as a means of assessing the severity of portal hypertension and the response to drugs which reduce the portal pressure in liver cirrhosis.     

Relationship between degree of portal hypertension and liver histologic lesions in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis

The relationship between the degree of portal hypertension and histologic liver lesions was studied in a group of 84 patients with histologically proven alcoholic cirrhosis. The degree of portal hypertension was evaluated by the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures. Five histologic lesions were quantified: liver cell necrosis, Mallory bodies, neutrophilic infiltrate, fibrosis, and fatty infiltration. The gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures was significantly correlated with the degree of liver cell necrosis and the degree of neutrophilic infiltrate. The stepwise regression analysis showed that only liver cell necrosis has a significant and independent correlation for the degree of portal hypertension. The value for the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures was significantly higher in patients with (N=48) than in those without (N=36) acute alcoholic hepatitis (19.4±0.8 and 16.5±0.7 mmHg, respectively). Thus, histologic liver lesions observed in acute alcoholic hepatitis may play a role in the risk of complications of portal hypertension in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.     

CO(2) wedged hepatic venography in the evaluation of portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS/METHODS: During hepatic vein catheterisation, in addition to measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), iodine wedged retrograde portography can be easily obtained. However, it rarely allows correct visualisation of the portal vein. Recently, CO(2) has been suggested to allow better angiographic demonstration of the portal vein than iodine. In this study we investigated the efficacy of CO(2) compared with iodinated contrast medium for portal vein imaging and its role in the evaluation of portal hypertension in a series of 100 patients undergoing hepatic vein catheterisation, 71 of whom had liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: In the overall series, CO(2) venography was markedly superior to iodine, allowing correct visualisation of the different segments of the portal venous system. In addition, CO(2), but not iodine, visualised portal-systemic collaterals in 34 patients. In cirrhosis, non-visualisation of the portal vein on CO(2) venography occurred in 11 cases; four had portal vein thrombosis and five had communications between different hepatic veins. Among non-cirrhotics, lack of portal vein visualisation had a 90% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 94% negative predictive value, and 83% positive predictive value in the diagnosis of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Visualisation of the venous portal system by CO(2) venography is markedly superior to iodine. The use of CO(2) wedged portography is a useful and safe complementary procedure during hepatic vein catheterisation which may help to detect portal thrombosis. Also, lack of demonstration of the portal vein in non-cirrhotic patients strongly suggests the presence of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension.     

Portal-systemic shunting in a patient with normal portal vein pressures and histological evidence of idiopathic portal hypertension

Although idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is clinically characterized by portal hypertension and marked splenomegaly, we have experienced a case of spontaneous portal-systemic shunt without splenomegaly in whom the liver histology resembled IPH but with normal portal pressure. We admitted a 64 year old man who had suffered from hepatic encephalopathy for 2 years. Laparoscopy revealed a dark grey liver with a sharp edge and a concave surface. Examination of a liver biopsy specimen revealed peri-portal fibrosis consistent with IPH. A single, large, portal-systemic shunt was identified by percutaneous transhepatic portography. The shunt arose from the left gastric vein and flowed through the left renal vein into the inferior vena cava. No varices were identified. There were no morphological changes in the hepatic or portal veins. Portal vein pressure was normal. There was a slight difference between the portal pressure and the wedged hepatic vein pressure, suggesting a presinusoidal block. This case raises important questions concerning the aetiology of IPH and the relationship between portal hypertension and the development of collateral venous circulation.     

Spontaneous intermittent reversal of blood flow in intrahepatic portal vein branches in cirrhosis of the liver

The intrahepatic portal venous flow in cirrhosis of the liver was evaluated by percutaneous transhepatic portography and hepatic arteriography. Spontaneous reversal of flow in segmental portal vein branches was documented. Changes in hepatic arterial inflow and portal venous pressure may result in intermittent changes in the direction of flow in segmental portal venous branches within the cirrhotic liver. Segmental reversal of blood flow seems to be the precursor of total hepatofugal portal flow.     

Measurement of portal vascular resistance in patients with portal hypertension

Portal vascular resistance was measured percutaneously in 60 patients with chronic liver disease and in 5 control subjects. The portal vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated, using the following equation, from the portal blood flow (QPV), portal venous pressure (PPV), and hepatic venous pressure (PHV): PVR = (PPV - PHV)/QPV. The portal blood flow was measured using an ultrasonic Doppler duplex system, and the portal venous and hepatic venous pressures were measured using percutaneous transhepatic catheterization and venous catheterization, respectively. The wedged hepatic venous pressure was measured by occluding the hepatic venous branch using a balloon catheter. The portal vascular resistance was 0.25 +/- 0.13 mmHg X ml-1 X min X kg body weight (mean +/- SD, n = 5) in the control group, 0.64 +/- 0.29 mmHg X ml-1 X min X kg body wt (n = 13) in the chronic active hepatitis group, 1.34 +/- 0.79 mmHg X ml-1 X min X kg body wt (n = 30) in the cirrhosis group, and 0.85 +/- 0.69 mmHg X ml-1 X min X kg body wt (n = 13) in the idiopathic portal hypertension group.     

The free portal pressure in awake patients with and without cirrhosis of the liver

ABSTRACT— The free portal pressure was measured by percutaneous transhepatic catheterization of the portal vein in 106 patients with cirrhosis of the liver and in 19 patients without liver disease and with normal portography. Patients with cirrhosis had a median portal pressure of 38 cmH₂O and patients without liver disease had a median portal pressure of 16 cmH₂O. Among the cirrhotic patients the free portal pressure showed no relationship to etiology of cirrhosis, ascites, variceal bleedings or extrahepatic shunting. The median portal pressure was significantly higher in patients with (40 cmH₂O) than without (30 cmH₂O) gastroesophageal varices (p<0.01). The pressure was not related to the size of the varices.     

Discrepancy between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure after acute propranolol administration in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis

In patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, wedged hepatic venous pressure closely reflects portal venous pressure. This study was carried out to determine if propranolol-induced reductions in portal venous pressure are accurately evaluated by the measurement of wedged hepatic venous pressure. Hepatic venous cannulation and percutaneous transhepatic catheterization of the portal vein were simultaneously performed in 7 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. One hour after oral administration of 40 mg of propranolol, wedged hepatic and portal venous pressures significantly decreased from 24.3 +/- 3.5 (mean +/- SD) to 19.0 +/- 3.0 mmHg, and from 24.7 +/- 3.9 to 22.4 +/- 3.6 mmHg, respectively. Although no significant difference was found between baseline wedged hepatic and portal venous pressures, a significant difference was found between these pressures after propranolol administration. We concluded that during acute administration of a drug acting on the splanchnic circulation, the measurement of wedged hepatic venous pressure may not provide a reliable estimation of the magnitude of the changes in portal venous pressure. There is, however, no evidence that the direction of the changes might not be adequately assessed by wedged hepatic venous pressure measurement.     

An endothelin receptor antagonist TAK-044 ameliorates carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury and portal hypertension in rats

ABSTRACT— Hepatic levels of a powerful vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptors increase in human and carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-induced liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether antagonism of hepatic ET-1 receptors ameliorates CCl₄-induced hepatic injury and portal hypertension in rats. Acute liver injury was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of CCl₄ (0.3 ml/kg), whereas cirrhosis and portal hypertension were induced by CCl₄ treatment (0.15 ml/kg twice a week) for 8 weeks. Hepatic morphology, ET-1 and its receptors, and portal venous pressures were determined. Increases in ET-1 and its receptors occurred within 24 h of CCl₄ administration, and progressively thereafter during the development of cirrhosis. The acute CCl₄-induced hepatic injury was characterized by significant increases in portal pressure (from 8.7 ± 1.8 to 17.6 ± 3.3 mmHg; p<0.01) and serum levels of liver enzymes, as well as massive hepatocellular necrosis (62±8%). Intravenous administration of an ET-1 receptor antagonist TAK-044 reduced portal pressure to 13.6±2.8 mmHg (p<0.05), and ameliorated hepatocellular necrosis by about 35% (p<0.001). TAK-044 treatment also produced significant reduction in serum levels of liver enzymes. In cirrhotic rats, portal venous infusion of TAK-044 reduced portal hypertension by about 40% (p<0.05). In conclusion, these results indicate involvement of ET-1 in acute liver injury as well as portal hypertension associated with hepatic cirrhosis, and a potential for ET-1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of these pathologic conditions.     

Wedged hepatic venous pressure reflects portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in nonalcoholic cirrhosis

Hepatic venous catheterization is widely used to assess portal pressure. However, it remains unclear whether wedged hepatic venous pressure is a close indicator of portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in nonalcoholic cirrhosis. To address this issue, we analyzed the data from our previous published studies. Forty patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis (HBV infection in five, HCV infection in 28, and cryptogenic in seven) were available in this analysis. A vasoconstrictor (N=14), vasodilator (N=10), or combination (N=16) was administered. The agreement of the changes between portal and wedged hepatic venous pressures during pharmacological manipulation was assessed by an intraclass correlation coefficient. The intraclass correlation coefficient in each subgroup was more than 0.60 (0.62 in vasoconstrictor group, 0.87 in vasodilator group, and 0.73 in combination group). When the analysis was performed according to the cause of liver disease, the values were 0.67 in HBV infection, 0.73 in HCV infection, and 0.74 in cryptogenic cirrhosis. These results suggest that wedged hepatic venous pressure reflects portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis.     

Comparison between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis

Portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure were measured simultaneously in 21 patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis of the liver and were compared to pressure measured in six patients with idiopathic portal hypertension. No significant difference in the portal venous pressure gradient was found between patients with cirrhosis and those with idiopathic portal hypertension (17.3 +/- 4.3 mmHg (mean +/- S.D.) vs. 19.7 +/- 3.1 mmHg, P greater than 0.05). However, the difference between the portal and the hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly smaller in patients with cirrhosis than in idiopathic portal hypertension patients (1.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 10.8 +/- 2.1 mmHg, P less than 0.001). An excellent correlation was found between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis (r = 0.94, P less than 0.001). There was no linear relationship between the portal venous pressure gradient and varix size or bleeding episodes. We concluded that a close agreement existed between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis. Therefore, measurement of wedged hepatic vein pressure reliably reflects portal vein pressure in these patients.     

Portal hypertension and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a haemodynamic study

BACKGROUND/AIM: The relationships between the levels of portal hypertension and the morphologic alterations of gastric mucosa in patients with liver cirrhosis--generally described as portal hypertensive gastropathy--are poorly defined. PATIENTS: In total, 62 patients with cirrhosis of different aetiologies, were examined by endoscopy and measurement of portal hypertension by hepatic venous pressure gradient. RESULTS: Portal hypertensive gastropathy was observed in 49 cases; six patients showed gastric antral vascular ectasia always associated with gastric lesions described as severe portal hypertensive gastropathy with different localizations. Hepatic venous pressure gradient showed severe portal hypertension in 37 cases, and averaged 17.7 +/- 4.3 mmHg. It was much higher in patients with severe lesions (p=0.0004). Hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with endoscopic signs of isolated antral gastropathy was lower (p=0.04) than in those with isolated lesions in body-fundus. No relationship was found between hepatic function, as assessed by the Child-Pugh score, and portal hypertensive gastropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that the severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy is related to portal hypertension, but portal hypertension is not the sole determinant of the occurrence of endoscopic abnormalities of gastric mucosa. The derangement of liver function does not appear to play any role in the occurrence of portal hypertensive gastropathy.     

Hepatic recompensation according to Baveno VII criteria is linked to a significant survival benefit in decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis

Background & Aims

Removing the primary aetiological factor in decompensated cirrhosis may lead to a restoration of hepatic function. In this study, we investigated the clinical implications of recompensation and the subsequent survival in patients with decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis.

Methods

The rate of recompensation was evaluated in patients with decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis and persistent alcohol abstinence undergoing a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Recompensation was defined according to Baveno VII criteria as resolution of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, absence of variceal bleeding and improvement in liver function.

Results

Two hundred and four abstinent patients with decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis (age: 57.2 [IQR:50.1–63.7] years; 75.0% male; median MELD: 15 [IQR:11–19]) and a median HVPG of 20 (IQR:18–24) mmHg were included. During a median follow-up of 24.4 (IQR:10.9–50.4) months, 37 patients (18.1%) achieved abstinence-induced recompensation. Lower baseline HVPG, lower Child-Pugh score, lower BMI, higher albumin and higher mean arterial pressure were linked to a higher probability of recompensation. After adjusting for age, disease severity, portal hypertension and systemic inflammation, achieving recompensation resulted in a significant and considerable reduction in liver-related mortality (adjusted HR: 0.091 [95% CI: 0.012–0.677]; p = .019). Only 13 patients (6.4%) developed hepatocellular carcinoma, with a tendency towards a lower risk upon recompensation (HR: 0.398 [95% CI: 0.084–1.878]; p = .245), yet this finding did not reach statistical significance and requires further investigation.

Conclusions

Alcohol abstinence led to recompensation in 18.1% of our cohort of HVPG-characterised patients with decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis. Achieving hepatic recompensation resulted in a >90% risk reduction in liver-related mortality.     

Hepatic Encephalopathy Associated with Extensive Portal Hepatic Venous Shunts: A Case Report

Extensive intrahepatic portal-hepatic venous anastomosis is very rare. This report describes a 47-year-old man with cirrhosis who presented with mental confusion and flapping tremor, and in whom percutaneous transhepatic portography and superior mesenteric angiography demonstrated shunting between the portal vein branches and the right hepatic vein. Measurements of pressure, ammonia, and immunoreactive insulin in blood of the portal and right hepatic veins clearly indicated that a large amount of portal vein blood was being shunted into the right hepatic vein. These findings suggest that hepatic encephalopathy in this patient is accounted for at least in part by an intrahepatic portal-hepatic venous shunting.     

Intrahepatic Heterogeneity of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Human Cirrhosis

Background: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is used to evaluate portal hypertension. Methods: We measured HVPG in two separate liver veins in 169 liver vein catheterizations in 102 cirrhosis patients and in 27 patients with no liver disease (controls). Results: In the controls, the two measurements differed by 0.0 ± 1.8 mmHg (mean ± s , n = 27), upper 95% confidence limit 3.6 mmHg (mean + 2 s ). HVPG ranged from-0.1 to 8.3 mmHg, upper 95% confidence limit 6.7 mmHg. In cirrhosis, the two measurements agreed within ± 3.6 mmHg in 39%. In 61%, the measurements differed by 4-34 mmHg. In 35%, fluoroscopy demonstrated hepatic vein-to-hepatic-vein shunting in veins with low HVPG values. In some patients with HVPG measurements above 30 mmHg, Doppler ultrasound examination showed arterialization of the hepatic vasculature. Discussion: Our results demonstrate a hitherto unrecognized notable heterogeneity of the intrahepatic vasculature and HVPG measurements in cirrhosis. The presumption of interposition of non-flowing blood between the catheter tip and the portal system for the measurement of HVPG may thus be violated in about one-third of the cirrhosis cases because of abnormal outlet into hepatic venous shunts and in a minor fraction because of abnormal arterial inlet. In 26%, one measurement was below 12 mmHg, the other measurement above. If the HVPG had been measured in only one liver vein, 13% of the cases would have been classified in a lower risk group than appropriate according to the 12 mmHg concept of risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices.     

Direct transhepatic assessment of hepatic vein pressure and direction of flow using a thin needle in patients with cirrhosis and Budd-Chiari syndrome. An effective alternative to hepatic vein catheterization

Portal pressure can be accurately measured transhepatically with a Chiba needle. Since 1980, we have used transhepatic hepatic vein pressures as our zero reference for transhepatic portal pressure measurements. To validate the latter technique, we performed hepatic vein catheterization and transhepatic hepatic vein puncture in 11 patients undergoing portal pressure measurement. Transhepatic hepatic vein puncture was simple, providing pressures as reproducible as those obtained by hepatic vein and inferior vena cava catheterization. These pressures were minimally higher than simultaneous free hepatic vein and inferior vena caval pressures, possibly reflecting the more proximal location of the small hepatic vein radicles often entered by this technique. Transhepatic hepatic vein puncture is an accurate way to determine hepatic vein pressure and, combined with transhepatic portal vein pressure measurement, completely obviates the need for venous catheterization for portal pressure determination. Transhepatic hepatic vein pressure was also measured in 3 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. In these patients, transhepatic hepatic vein pressure was elevated and equaled or exceeded portal vein pressure. Abnormal venous collaterals were identified in all patients. Transhepatic portal pressure studies are also an appropriate way to evaluate patients suspected of having hepatic outflow obstruction.