Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: results of another case-control study

We report the results of a case-control study of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer conducted in London, Oxford and Edinburgh between 1980 and 1984. One thousand one hundred and twenty-five women aged 16-64 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer and a like number of matched controls were interviewed and asked about their past due use of oral contraceptives (OCs). Among women aged 45 years or more at diagnosis there was no evidence of an association between OC use and breast cancer. Among the 351 pairs of women aged under 45 years at diagnosis there was a significantly elevated risk associated with increasing duration of use before first full term pregnancy (relative risk for 4+ years use versus never use = 2.6, 95% confidence limits, 1.3-5.4). Since this result is at variance with the findings in some other studies we have investigated the nature of this association with particular emphasis on possible bias, pill type and a latent effect.     

A case-control study of hair dye use and breast cancer.

A case-control study of the relationship between hair dye use and breast cancer included 129 breast cancer patients and 193 control women drawn from the records of a multiphasic screening clinic. Information was obtained by telephone interview on a number of risk factors for breast cancer and on variables pertaining to hair dye use: chronologic time, duration, frequency, type, and color. From this, quantitative measures of cumulative hair dye use at various intervals prior to breast cancer (or an equivalent for controls) were obtained. A multivariate risk factor score was used to control for confounding variables. The adjusted relative risks for breast cancer versus hair dye use were greater than unity but were not generally significant. However, integral measures of hair dye use (No. of yr times frequency per yr) were significantly related to breast cancer when confounding variables were controlled. The association between hair dye use and breast cancer was greatest among women over 50 years of age and among those at lower natural risk for breast cancer. An analysis of temporal patterns showed that breast cancer was related mainly to hair dye use 10 or more years before cancer diagnosis. Because of the retrospective nature of the hair dye data and the small sample size, these results require further validation.     

A cohort study of oral contraceptive use and risk of benign breast disease.

The purpose of the cohort study reported here was to investigate the association between oral contraceptive use and risk of benign breast disease (BBD), overall and by histological subtype, within the 56,537 women in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) who completed self-administered lifestyle and dietary questionnaires. The NBSS is a randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-59 at recruitment. Cases were the 2,116 women in the dietary cohort who were diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed incident BBD. For comparative purposes, a subcohort consisting of a random sample of 5,681 women (including 197 subjects with incident BBD) was selected from the full dietary cohort. After exclusions for various reasons, the analyses were based on 2,116 cases and 5,338 non-cases. There was an inverse association between use of oral contraceptives and risk of all types of BBD combined. The reduction in risk was confined largely to proliferative forms of BBD (BPED), and in particular, to those forms of BPED without histological atypia, in whom there was a progressive reduction in risk with increasing duration of use (the IRR (95% CI) for use of more than 7 years was 0.64 (0.47-0.87)); risk of BPED with atypia was increased somewhat in association with oral contraceptive use (the IRR (95% CI) for use of more than 7 years was 1.43 (0.68-3.01 )), but not in a dose-dependent manner. The results were similar when examined separately in the screened and control arms of the NBSS and for screen-detected and interval-detected BPED.     

A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies of melanoma and oral contraceptive use

Data regarding the effects of oral contraceptive use on women's risk of melanoma have been difficult to resolve. We undertook a pooled analysis of all case-control studies of melanoma in women completed as of July 1994 for which electronic data were available on oral contraceptive use along with other melanoma risk factors such as hair colour, sun sensitivity, family history of melanoma and sun exposure. Using the original data from each investigation (a total of 2391 cases and 3199 controls), we combined the study-specific odds ratios and standard errors to obtain a pooled estimate that incorporates inter-study heterogeneity. Overall, we observed no excess risk associated with oral contraceptive use for 1 year or longer compared to never use or use for less than 1 year (pooled odds ratio (pOR)=0.86; 95% CI=0.74-1.01), and there was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies. We found no relation between melanoma incidence and duration of oral contraceptive use, age began, year of use, years since first use or last use, or specifically current oral contraceptive use. In aggregate, our findings do not suggest a major role of oral contraceptive use on women's risk of melanoma.     

Early oral contraceptive use as a prognostic factor in breast cancer

The survival of 193 premenopausal breast cancer patients was investigated in relation to their history of early use of oral contraceptives. The women were born in 1939 or later and diagnosed in the southern health care region of Sweden. Women, who had started their oral contraceptive use (OC-use) before 20 years of age had a significantly lower survival rate as compared with those who had never used OC and late users (p = 0.02 and = 0.04 respectively, generalized Wilcoxon test). For women who started OC-use between 20 to 25 years of age, a tendency for a shorter survival was seen in comparison with women who had never used OC (p = 0.18). For all patients simultaneously, the relative risk adjusted for age at diagnosis increased for earlier OC-start. When only stages II and III were considered in a stratified multivariate model, a significantly elevated risk was seen for early users of OC irrespective of age or of adjuvant treatment given. The estrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations of the primary tumor were significantly lower among early users (p = 0.001 and p = 0.05 respectively).     

Rauwolfia use and breast cancer: a case-control study

Breast cancer risk among 1,362 cases and 1,250 controls participating in a large multicenter screening program was examined in relation to hypertension and the use of rauwolfia derivatives. A previous diagnosis of hypertension, reported by 22% of the cases and 23% of the controls, was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.9]; nor was there any excess risk for long-term hypertensives. In addition, there was no significant increase in risk associated with use of either rauwolfia derivatives (OR = 1.2), thiazide preparations (OR = 1.2), or methyldopa (OR = 1.1). However, there were significant excess risks among long-term users and those with extended intervals since first use of rauwolfia. Rauwolfia users of 10 or more years' duration or those whose initial use occurred greater than or equal to 10 years before diagnosis had risk ratios of 4.5 (95% Cl, 1.2-19.8) and 3.8 (95% Cl, 2.3-11.6), respectively. These results suggest that women exposed to long-term rauwolfia use have an elevated risk of developing breast cancer, although the results fail to support previous observations of a generalized adverse effect.     

Recent oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (United States)

We examined the association between recent oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of breast cancer in data from a large population-based case-control study in the United States. Cases (n=6,751) were women less than 75 years old who had breast cancer identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls (n=9,311) were selected randomly from lists of licensed drivers (if aged under 65 years) and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries (if aged 65 through 74 years). Information on OC use, reproductive experiences, and family and medical history was obtained by telephone interview. After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors, women who had ever used OCs were at similar risk of breast cancer as never-users (relative risk [RR]=1.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=10–1.2). Total duration of usealso was not related to risk. There was a suggestion that more recent use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; use less than two years ago was associated with an RR of 1.3 (CI=0.9–1.9). However, only among women aged 35 to 45 years at diagnosis was the increase in risk among recent users statistically significantly elevated (RR=2.0, CI=1.1–3.9). Use prior to the first pregnancy or among nulliparous women was not associated with increased risk. Among recent users of OCs, the risk associated with use was greatest among non-obese women, e.g., among women with body mass index (kg/m²) less than 20.4, RR=1.7, CI=1.1–2.8. While these results suggest that, in general, breast cancer risk is not increased substantially among women who have used OCs, they also are consistent with a slight increased risk among subgroups of recent users.Authors are with the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA (Dr Newcomb, Ms Trentham Dietz); NIEHS Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Longnecker); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (Dr Surer); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (Dr Mittendorf); Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Baron); Boston University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Dr Clapp); Department of Epidemiology and Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, and Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Willett). Address correspondence to: Dr Polly A. Newcomb, University of Wisconsin-Madison Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1300 University Ave., #4780, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Supported by Public Health Service (National Cancer Institute) grants R01 CA 47147 and R01 CA 47305.     

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurses' Health Study, United States)

Results of previous epidemiologic studies have provided reassurance that there is little, if any, increase in risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive (OC) use in general. However, in several studies, an increased risk of breast cancer has been observed in two subgroups, young women who used OCs for extended durations and in women who used OCs prior to a first-term pregnancy. We evaluated these relationships using data from the ongoing Nurses' Health Study cohort (United States). We documented 3,383 cases of breast cancer from 1976 to 1992 among 1.6 million person-years of follow-up. We observed no overall relationship between duration of OC use and breast cancer risk, even among women who reported using OCs for 10 or more years (multivariate relative risk [RR]=1.11, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.94-1.32). Among women less than 45 years of age, the multivariate RR for using OCs for 10 or more years was 1.07 (CI=0.70-1.65) compared with never-users. The risk associated with five or more years of OC use prior to a first full-term pregnancy compared with never-use was 0.96 (CI=0.65-1.43). Among women less than 45 years of age, we observed no evidence of an increased risk with OC use before a first full-term pregnancy (use for five or more years: RR=0.57, CI=0.24-1.31). Because of the age distribution of our cohort, we were unable to evaluate these relationships among women less than 40 years of age. Our study provides considerable evidence that long-term past OC use, either overall or prior to a first full-term pregnancy, does not result in any appreciable increase in breast cancer risk in women over 40 years of age.     

A case-control study of male breast cancer

A case-control study was conducted in Los Angeles County, CA, of 75 male breast cancer cases aged 20-74 yr at diagnosis to investigate the role of a number of suspected risk factors. The study involved both interviews and laboratory measurements. Factors under study included fertility and marital history, obesity, alcohol and cigarette consumption, use of drugs known or suspected of causing gynecomastia, family history of breast cancer, history of radiation exposure to the upper body, sex chromatin analysis, serum levels of prolactin, testosterone, estrone, estradiol and sex-hormone-binding globulin, as well as urinary levels of estrone, estradiol, and estriol. Two patients versus no controls tested positive for sex chromatin and were excluded from further analyses. The only statistically significant risk factor identified was greater weight of the cases at age 30; a man who weighed 80 or more kg at age 30 had twice the risk of breast cancer of a man weighing less than 60 kg at that age. Serum estrone levels were positively, and sex-hormone-binding globulin levels were negatively, related to body weight, and we interpret the greater weight of the cases as suggesting that the underlying risk factor is an increased exposure to bioavailable estrogen. None of the differences observed between cases and controls for either the serum or urinary hormone levels was, however, statistically significant and there did not appear to be any large absolute excess of estrogens or deficit of testosterone in the cases. This apparent contradiction may be explained by the fact that there was little difference in weight between the cases and controls at the time of sampling.     

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and colorectal adenomas

Purpose

The influence of reproductive factors on colorectal cancer, including oral contraceptive (OC) use, has been examined, but less research is available on OC use and adenomas.

Methods

Participants of the Nurses’ Health Study who had a lower bowel endoscopy between 1986 (when endoscopies were first assessed) and 2008 were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression models for clustered data were used to estimate odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals [OR (95 % CIs)].

Results

Among 73,058 participants, 51 % (n = 37,382) reported ever using OCs. Ever OC use was associated with a slight increase in non-advanced adenomas [OR 1.11, 95 % CI (1.02, 1.21)] but not with any other endpoints. Duration of OC use was not associated with adenomas, but longer times since last OC use were associated with increased odds of adenomas [e.g., compared to never use, 15+ years since last use: OR 1.17 (1.07, 1.27)]. Shorter times since last OC use were inversely associated [e.g., ≤4 years since last use: OR 0.74 (0.65, 0.84)].

Conclusions

We observed a modest borderline increase in risk of colorectal adenomas with any prior OC use. Additionally, more recent OC use may decrease risk, while exposure in the distant past may modestly increase risk of adenomas.

     

Oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer: An Italian case-control study

The association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of ovarian cancer was analysed in a case-control study, conducted between 1985 and 1989 on 505 epithelial ovarian cancer cases under 60 years of age, and 1375 controls in hospitals for a spectrum of acute conditions, not gynaecological, hormonal or neoplastic, apparently unrelated to OC use. 41 (8.1%) women with epithelial ovarian cancer and 192 (14.0%) controls reported OC use. The multivariate relative risk (RR) for ever use was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5–1.0). The risk decreased with duration of use: compared with never users the multivariate RRs were 0.9 and 0.5 respectively for less than 2 years and 2 years or more users (X²₁ trend = 6.17, P = 0.01). The risk of ovarian cancer decreased with recency and latency of use: the estimated RR were 0.5 and 0.9 in women reporting last OC use less than 10 or 10 years or more from the diagnosis of the disease, and 0.6 and 0.8 in those reporting first OC use less than 10 or 15 or more years before. The protective effect of OC was consistent in separate strata of selected covariates, including parity and other major known or suspected risk factors for ovarian cancer. There was some indication that the protection declines with advancing age, but the risk estimates were similar in premenopause and postmenopause.     

男性和女性乳腺癌对照研究

目的研究男性乳腺癌（MBC）的临床特点和可能影响预后的因素。方法回顾1996年1月至2008年1月住院治疗且经病理证实的17例MBC病例，并以同期102例女性乳腺癌患者作对照分析。结果MBC占同期住院治疗的乳腺癌的1．15％（17／1473）。男性组患者的就诊年龄较大、发现肿块至就诊时间较长，就诊时局部皮肤改变及腋窝淋巴结肿大的发生率高于女性组（均P〈0．05），校正了肿瘤分期及腋窝淋巴结状况因素，两组总体5年肿瘤相关生存率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论该组MBC患者与女性乳腺癌预后相近，性别不一定是影响MBC的预后因素。     

A retrospective case-control study of the use of hormone-related supplements and association with breast cancer

Hormone-related supplements (HRS), many of which contain phytoestrogens, are widely used to manage menopausal symptoms, yet their relationship with breast cancer risk has generally not been evaluated. We evaluated whether use of HRS was associated with breast cancer risk, using a population-based case-control study in 3 counties of the Philadelphia metropolitan area consisting of 949 breast cancer cases and 1,524 controls. Use of HRS varied significantly by race, with African American women being more likely than European American women to use any herbal preparation (19.2% vs. 14.7%, p=0.003) as well as specific preparations including black cohosh (5.4% vs. 2.0%, p=0.003), ginseng (12.5% vs. 7.9%, p<0.001) and red clover (4.7% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001). Use of black cohosh had a significant breast cancer protective effect (adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70). This association was similar among women who reported use of either black cohosh or Remifemin (an herbal preparation derived from black cohosh; adjusted odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.82). The literature reports that black cohosh may be effective in treating menopausal symptoms, and has antiestrogenic, antiproliferative and antioxidant properties. Additional confirmatory studies are required to determine whether black cohosh could be used to prevent breast cancer.     

The association between oral contraceptive use and lobular and ductal breast cancer in young women

Recent reports indicate that the incidence of lobular breast cancer is increasing at a faster rate than ductal breast cancer, which may be due to the differential effects of exogenous hormones by histology. To address this issue, we examined whether the relationship between oral contraceptive use and incident breast cancer differs between lobular and ductal subtypes in young women. A population-based sample of in situ and invasive breast cancer cases between ages 20 and 44 were recruited from Atlanta, GA; Seattle-Puget Sound, WA and central New Jersey. Controls were sampled from the same areas by random-digit dialing, and were frequency matched to the expected case age distribution. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using polytomous logistic regression. Among the 100 lobular cancers, 1,164 ductal cancers, and 1,501 controls, the odds ratios for oral contraceptive ever use were 1.10 (95% CI = 0.68-1.78) for lobular cancers and 1.21 (95% CI = 1.01-1.45) for ductal cancers, adjusted for study site, age at diagnosis, and pap screening history. Our results suggest that the magnitude of the association between ever use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer in young women does not vary strongly by histologic subtype. These results are similar to previous studies that report little difference in the effect of oral contraceptive use on breast cancer by histology.     

Previous oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk according to hormone replacement therapy use among postmenopausal women

Objective To assess postmenopausal breast cancer risk in relation to particular patterns of oral contraceptive (OC) use according to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) exposure.Methods Time-dependent Cox regression models were used to analyse information on postmenopausal women from a large-scale French cohort. Among a total of 68,670 women born between 1925 and 1950, 1405 primary invasive postmenopausal breast cancer cases were identified from 1992 to 2000.Results A non-significant decrease in risk of around 10% was associated with ever OC use as compared to never OC use in postmenopausal women. No significant interaction was found between OC and HRT use on postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast cancer risk decreased significantly with increasing time since first OC use (test for trend: p=0.01); this was consistent after adjustment for duration of use or for time since last use.Conclusion No increase in breast cancer risk was associated with previous OC exposure among postmenopausal women, probably because the induction window had closed. Some women may develop breast cancer soon after exposure to OCs, leading to a deficit of cases of older women. Further investigation is therefore required to identify young women at high risk.* Address correspondence to: F. Clavel-Chapelon, Equipe E3N-EPIC, INSERM “Nutrition, Hormones, Cancer”, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 – Villejuif, France.