Translation and validation of the Chinese version of GOHAI

OBJECTIVE: To translate and validate the Chinese version of General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) for elderly in Hong Kong and to investigate factors that possibly may influence the GOHAI scores. METHODS: The English version of GOHAI was translated into Chinese. Persons aged 60-80 years were interviewed by two trained interviewers and clinically examined by a dentist. Information on subjects' demographic background and oral health conditions was collected. RESULTS: Altogether 1,023 elderly were interviewed and clinically examined. The mean GOHAI score was 48.9 (SD = 7.2). Cronbach's alpha of the translated GOHAI was 0.81; item-scale correlation ranged from 0.28-0.61. It was found that the mean GOHAI scores were lower for subjects with poorer perceived oral health (rs = 0.57, P < .001). Elderly who had perceived dental treatment need had a lower mean GOHAI score than those who did not (P < .001). It was also found that elderly who lived in elderly homes, those who received social welfare assistance, those who had recent dental visits, and those with higher DMFT scores had higher mean GOHAI scores. CONCLUSION: The translated Chinese version of GOHAI demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. It is available for use by researchers in oral health-related quality of life studies on Chinese elderly population.     

Validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in the Malay language

OBJECTIVE: To translate and validate the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI into the Malay language for use in Malaysia. METHODOLOGY: The 6-Likert scale GOHAI was translated into the Malay language and self-administered on 189 subjects aged 60+. All subjects underwent oral status assessment. The measure was assessed for construct and discriminant validity, for test-retest reliability and principal component factor. FINDINGS: Mean GOHAI score was 46.2 (SD 9.7, range 17-60). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.79. Mean GOHAI scores increased with more positive self-rated oral health and general health. The elderly with no perceived dental treatment need had higher mean GOHAI scores than those with perceived needs. There were slightly stronger inverse correlations between GOHAI scores and caries experience, number of teeth present, and number of pathologically mobile teeth. The measure demonstrated strong test-retest reliability. Eight of the 12 items had Spearman's r3 0.7. Only one principal factor was found at eigenvalue > 1. Using ANCOVA, self-rated perception of oral health and perceived need for dental treatment had the most significant impact on the GOHAI score. CONCLUSION: AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Malay language version of the GOHAI demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and will be an important instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life among Malay-speaking Malaysians. Use of the Malay language version GOHAI should also be pursued among diverse adult age groups.     

Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France

Oral health has traditionally been defined in terms of disease. Today, health is seen in a wider context: taking into account its impact on everyday living. Several indices attempt to capture this dimension. The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) has been adapted for general use and tested on adult samples, mainly in North America. Language, cultural norms and the health care system in France are different and this raises the need to validate the GOHAI in France before it receives widespread use. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the validity of a French version of the GOHAI. METHODS: The GOHAI is based on responses to a 12-item self-administered questionnaire. The items were translated into French, back-translated and compared with the original. After pilot testing and minor modifications, the French version was administered to a group of low-income persons benefiting from the national health insurance system (n = 260, 18-45 years). Measures for stability and internal consistency were calculated. Concurrent and discriminant validity were assessed. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha (0.86) showed a high internal consistency and homogeneity between items. Item-scale correlations varied between 0.40 and 0.78. Repeat administration of the GOHAI to 32 participants gave weighted kappa coefficients from 0.51 to 0.87 and a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87. Low GOHAI scores were associated with perceptions of poor oral and general health, low satisfaction with oral health and a perceived need for dental care. There were significant relationships between the GOHAI score and most objective measures of dental status except FT. Younger, well-educated and higher income respondents were more likely to have a high GOHAI score. CONCLUSION: The French version of the GOHAI exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties but two items (one about swallowing, the other with complex sentence structure) had poor stability.     

《口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP—14中文版）》与《老年口腔健康评价指数（GOHAI中文版）》的比较研究

目的：了解《口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP～14中文版）》与《老年口腔健康评价指数（GOHAI中文版）》各自特点及应用范围,指导口腔健康相关生存质量临床研究开展。方法：使用两种量表选取60岁以上、无认知障碍及视力疾患的老年人进行调查及口腔检查。通过对老年人口腔健康相关生存质量的测评,比较两份量表的维度、条目内部一致性及区分效度。结果：共250位老年人参与此次研究,收回有效量表221份,无效量表29份,数据缺失量表12份。比较两种量表平均得分GOHAI中文版比OHIP-14中文版高（P〈0．01）。两份量表都可由缺失牙数区分有牙颌人群的生存质量,同时能够区分出戴用活动义齿的人群与不戴用活动义齿的人群的生存质量,以及能通过自我评价口腔状况和满意程度方面来区分不同人群的生存质量。通过比较可认为这两份量表都具有一定的区分效度。结论：《老年口腔健康评价指数（GOHAI中文版）》和《口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP-14中文版）》在信度、效度方面存在的差异并不明显,维度的分布方面则各有所侧重。     

Psychometric properties of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and dental status of an elderly Mexican population

Objectives: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Geriatric/General Oral Health Assessment Index, Spanish version (GOHAI‐Sp) and their relationship with the dentition status of an elderly Mexican population as a discriminatory validation. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted among persons over 60 years of age. A Spanish version the GOHAI‐Sp validated in Spain in institutionalized geriatric patients was used. Clinical evaluation was done in order to determine experience with coronal and root caries. Results: Measurement of internal consistency of the GOHAI gave a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.77 for the 12 items. In factorial analysis, one factor alone was capable of explaining 30.6 percent of the total variance. The factor that was most apparent in the factorial analysis of the GOHAI had coefficients >0.30 for the 12 items. The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of simple adequacy was 0.81 and the Bartlett's sphericity test was 1,748.55 with 66 degrees of freedom (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the GOHAI scores between the responses to self‐perception of oral and general health (P < 0.001). Also, there was a statistically significant low correlation coefficient between the missing and filled components of the DMFT index and the number of healthy and functional teeth (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The GOHAI has acceptable psychometric properties, discriminates between self‐perception of oral health and self‐perception of general health, and correlates with past caries experience measured by the DMFT index.     

Determinants of change in oral health‐related quality of life over 7 years among older Japanese

Because there are more elderly people than ever before and because they are living for longer periods of time, it is essential to understand the determinants of healthy ageing. This study examined changes in oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) among Japanese elderly over a 7‐year period. A sample of independently living individuals (aged 60+ years) underwent a questionnaire and dental examination at baseline and 7 years afterwards. The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used to assess the impact of oral conditions. Occlusal force and salivary flow were also assessed. Of the 411 participants assessed at baseline, 130 (31·6%) accepted to participate after 7 years. There were no significant differences between those lost to follow‐up and those assessed at 7 years, except that a higher proportion of the latter rated their baseline general health as good. Among the latter, the overall mean GOHAI score did not change significantly (11·8 at baseline and 11·1 at follow‐up; P = 0·16). However, after controlling for age, gender and baseline GOHAI score, participants who had lost teeth or experienced a decline in occlusal force after 7 years had higher follow‐up GOHAI scores (indicating poorer OHRQoL). Unfavourable changes in clinical oral status over time are reflected in poorer self‐rated oral health.     

A German version of the GOHAI

Abstract – Objectives: Translation, reliability analysis and validation of a German version of the Geriatric/General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was the aim of this study. Methods: Translation was performed by a forward–backward process. Validity was assessed as convergent validity in comparison with another self‐perceived assessment of oral health (OHIP‐14) and as group validity (n = 218; mean age 73 years). Reliability was proved in terms of internal consistency, inter‐item and item‐scale correlations, and stability (test–retest procedure; n = 36; mean age 77 years). The responsiveness to change in oral health status was assessed by pre‐ and post‐treatment comparison (n = 21; mean age 63 years). Results: A German version of the GOHAI is presented. Convergent validity was sufficient (r = ?0.76 compared with OHIP‐14); group validity could be demonstrated for self‐perceived need for treatment, chewing problems, number of own teeth, caries lesions present and dental status. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) as were inter‐item and item‐scale correlations, for which good homogeneity of the index was apparent. The test–retest correlation for the summary score was r = 0.84, single item correlations ranged from r = 0.36 to r = 0.89. The GOHAI sum score increased significantly after patients received new dentures, indicating responsiveness of the GOHAI to clinical change in the expected direction. Conclusions: The German version of the GOHAI had sufficient reliability, validity and responsiveness to be used as measure of oral health‐related quality of life in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies of the elderly.     

A comparison of oral health in elderly populations seeking and not seeking dental care

The General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) has been recommended for use as an outcome measure In the evaluation of dental treatment. This study was designed to assess the ability of the GOHAI In the evaluation of differences in those actively seeking dental care compared with those not seeking care. GOHAI was self-administered to two samples of elderly Individuals, over 65 years of age, In the Columbus, OH, area. The first sample was ambulatory individuals living in a nursing home in Columbus, and the second sample consisted of patients accessing dental care at The Ohio State University (OSU) dental school clinics. Other variables used in this study were age, gender, self-rated oral and general health, and use of prostheses. Overall mean GOHAI score in the nursing home respondents was significantly higher (32.1 ± 3.0) when compared with that of dental patients (mean, 30.4 ± 3.9, p = 0.01). Mean GOHAI scores for all categories of variables used were consistently higher (better) in the nursing home respondents than for the dental patients. Results of this study show that self-assessed oral health measured by the GOHAI was higher for those individuals not seeking dental care than for those actively seeking dental care. The GOHAI is sensitive as an outcome measure in differentiating between Individuals actively seeking care and those not seeking care .     

老年患者口腔健康生命质量的相关因素分析

目的：初步研究老年口腔疾病患者的口腔健康生命质量及其影响因素。方法：选择在中山大学光华口腔医学院门诊就诊的250名55岁以上（含55岁）的老年人，应用老年口腔健康评价指数（geriatric oral healthassessment index，GOHAI）量表中文版、一般项目表及自我口腔健康评价表对其口腔健康生命质量进行调查，通过多元回归分析得出影响口腔健康生命质量的相关因素。结果：GOHAI中文版平均得分为12．26±7．67。多元回归方程为：GOHAI中文版得分=-6．477＋0．309×自我评价的口腔健康＋0．164×缺失牙数＋0．237×对口腔状况的满意度＋0．127×对生活的满意度，方程的决定系数为0．423。结论：自我评价的口腔健康、缺失牙数、对口腔状况的满意度及对生活的满意度是影响老年患者口腔健康生命质量的主要因素。     

Oral health-related quality of life and nutritional status

OBJECTIVES: This study examines whether oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is associated with malnutrition risk in the elderly. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed using a representative sample of Spaniards over 65 years old. Data on sociodemographics and oral health status were gathered by interview and examination. Oral health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), and malnutrition risk using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). RESULTS: The final sample included 2,860 elderly, 41.7 percent males and 58.3 percent females, with a mean age of 73.7 +/- 6.8 years. Mean GOHAI score was 52.1 +/- 7.2, with 70.7 percent of the sample needing oral health care according to this index. The mean MNA score was 24.0 +/- 3.31; 3.5 percent of the elderly were malnourished, 31.5 percent were at risk of malnutrition, and 65.0 percent were considered adequately nourished. A strong association was found between mean GOHAI and MNA scores.     

老年无牙颌患者首次配戴全口义齿前后口腔健康评价指数的变化

目的:应用老年口腔健康评价指数(Geriatric Oralhealth Assessment Index,GOHAI)中文版量表测量初次配戴全口义齿的老年无牙颌患者治疗前后口腔健康相关生活质量(Oral Health-related Quality of Life,OHRQoL)的变化。方法:80例老年无牙颌患者分别于配戴义齿前和配戴义齿后1个月填写GOHAI中文版量表,进行相关统计分析。结果:配戴义齿1月后量表的12个条目中有7个得分明显比配戴义齿前得分升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);量表总得分和3个维度中的2个得分明显升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:全口义齿的配戴不仅改善了老年无牙颌患者的生理功能,更为重要的是满足了患者的心理和社会交往的需求。     

Impact of masticatory performance on oral health-related quality of life for elderly Japanese

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the association of masticatory performance with oral health-related quality of life in independently living elderly Japanese subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 1028 independently living people over the age of 60 years. Masticatory performance was determined by the concentration of dissolved glucose obtained from test gummy jellies, which are the standardized food developed for measuring masticatory performance. The short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) were used to measure the impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Subjects with lower masticatory performance had significantly higher total OHIP-14 and GOHAI scores (15.0 +/- 9.0 and 14.5 +/- 9.2, respectively) than their counterparts (10.0 +/- 7.5 and 11.3 +/- 7.1, respectively) (P < .01). Logistic regression analyses showed that after controlling for age, gender, self-perceived general health, satisfaction with financial status, and number of teeth, a higher GOHAI score was significantly related to lower masticatory performance (P = .001; odds ratio: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.79). A higher OHIP-14 score was associated with lower masticatory performance but at a level below statistical significance (P = .096; odds ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.05). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that masticatory performance is an important factor influencing the quality of life in independently living, relatively healthy elderly Japanese subjects.     

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the OHIP-14 among patients in general and specialist dental care

The aim of this study was to investigate the Swedish version of an oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) instrument, the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and to assess OHRQL among patients in general dental care and specialist clinics (periodontics, TMD and implant dentistry) in G?teborg, Sweden. Consecutively selected patients were asked to answer the OHIP-14, the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and a questionnaire including socio-demographic, general health and oral health questions. 153 patients (50-89 years old) out of 237 (65%) returned the questionnaires. Cronbach's Alpha among the OHIP items was high (0.93) and the corrected item-scale correlation varied between 0.51 and 0.79. The correlation between the OHIP-14 score and the GOHAI was high (-0.83) indicating good criterion validity. The mean additive OHIP-14 score was 22.6 (SD = 10.5). Implant patients scored significantly higher than other patient groups with respect to missing teeth, dentures and mobile teeth. High scores were also associated with perceived poor general health and dissatisfaction with life-situation. The test-retest reliability was assessed in a separate sample (n = 47) and the correlation coefficient was 0.85. The Swedish version of OHIP-14 demonstrated good reliability and validity. The poorer OHRQL reported by the implant patients reflects the strong association found between OHIP score and dentures and missing teeth, while OHIP-14 did not show similar sensitivity to other impacts of oral disorders.     

Oral health-related quality of life of stroke survivors on discharge from hospital after rehabilitation

The study aimed to investigate oral health-related quality of life (OHR-QoL) of stroke survivors on hospital discharge after rehabilitation. It was a cross-sectional study involving 43 elderly survivors of mild to moderate stroke about to be discharged from hospital after rehabilitation and a comparison group of 43 community-dwelling elderly people. The Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) measure, the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and an oral health transition scale were administered prior to a dental examination. Median SF-36 subscale scores were significantly different between groups (P < 0.05). In physical function, role-physical, role-emotional and mental health domains, stroke survivors had significantly lower scores indicating poorer health. The median GOHAI score for the stroke group was 52 and 54 for the comparison group with no significant difference between groups although more stroke survivors had difficulty speaking compared with the comparison group. About 75% of stroke survivors considered their appearance to be worse, half of them felt that speech was worse and about a third had difficulty chewing hard food compared with the pre-stroke condition (P < 0.05). Most participants were partially dentate with no significant difference in DMFT scores or prosthetic status between groups (P > 0.05). Health-related quality of life in general was significantly poorer after stroke although patients were considered physically well enough to be discharged from hospital. There was some impairment of OHR-QoL. The nature of the stroke, the hospital environment including diet, coping strategies and elderly Chinese peoples' perception of health should be taken into account when interpreting measures of health status in stroke survivors.     

口腔健康促进项目对养老院老年人牙周健康和生活质量的影响

目的： 评价口腔健康促进项目对养老院老年人牙周健康及生活质量的影响。方法： 以武汉市2个城区的5所养老院老年人为研究对象,随机整群分为干预组和对照组,在干预组开展为期6个月的口腔健康促进项目,内容包括面对面口腔健康教育和发放牙具等。采用SPSS 21.0软件包,利用t检验和重复测量方差分析比较2组在干预前、后的老年口腔健康评价指数（GOHAI）和临床检查指标的变化,包括简化口腔卫生指数（OHI-S）、牙龈指数（GI）、探诊出血指数（BOP）和牙周袋深度（PD）。结果： 共322人完成随访,其中干预组144人,对照组178人。干预前,2组的社会人口学特征、GOHAI总分和临床检查指标均无显著差异（P>0.05）。干预后,与对照组相比,干预组的GOHAI总分,OHI-S、GI、BOP均显著改善（P<0.05）。结论： 健康教育与行为干预相结合的健康促进项目能够改善养老院老年人的口腔健康相关生活质量及牙周健康状况,是养老机构改善老年人牙周健康的有效措施。     

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in institutionalized elderly in Barcelona (Spain)

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the oral health status and the factors associated with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in people aged 65 and older institutionalized in Barcelona in 2009. Study Design: Cross sectional study in 194 elderly. The dependent variable was poor OHRQoL, according to the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). The independent variables were socio-demographic data, last dental visit, subjective and objective oral health status. Robust Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with OHRQoL as well as the strengths of association (Prevalence Ratios with respective confidence intervals at 95%). Results: According to GOHAI, 94 women (68.1%) and 36 men (64.3%) had poor OHRQoL. The average DMFT index (number of decayed, missing and filled teeth) was 22.8, with mean 10.2 remaining teeth. According to the Community Periodontal Index only 1.9% were healthy. 33.8% of the sample (35.5% of women and 30.4% of men) presented edentulism, 54.2% needed upper dental prostheses (51.1% of women and 60.7% of men) and 64.7% needed lower ones (61.6% of women and 71.4% of men). Only 7.2% had visited a dentist in the past year (8.8% of women and 3.6% of men). After fitting several multivariate adjusted robust Poisson regression models, poor OHRQoL was found to be associated to self-reporting problems with teeth or gums, self-reporting poor opinion about teeth/gums/denture and also associated to functional edentulism, needing upper denture, but not to socio-demographic factors or time since last dental visit. Conclusions: The study population has poor objective oral health. A high percentage has poor OHRQoL associated to subjective and objective oral health conditions. Dental care is required and these services should be included in the Spanish National Health System. Key words:Oral health, homes for the aged, elderly, self-assessment, quality of life, geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI).     

Using patient self-report data to evaluate orofacial surgical outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzes results of 336 patients treated for mandible fractures at King/Drew Medical Center in South Central Los Angeles, California from August 1996 to December 2001. Subjects were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate the association between patient's subjective evaluation and objective clinical evaluations on three surgical outcome measures following orofacial surgery. METHODS: Subjects were assessed at four time periods--hospital discharge, 10 days post-discharge, 1 month post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge. Three outcome measures were utilized to represent perceived health and oral health-related quality of life--General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI); Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5); and a single-item self-reported health status measure. RESULTS: GOHAI scores at 1 month (mean=31.5, SD=9.5) were not substantially higher than at 10 days (mean=28.6, SD=8.8), but scores did improve substantially by 6 months (mean=42.6, SD=10.6). Mean mental health scores ranged from 17.7 at 10 days to 18.0 at 1 month and 18.6 at 6 months. Mean self-reported health status score were approximately 2.2 at all recalls, describing health as 'good.' A longitudinal growth curve analysis of GOHAI scores over four time periods indicated a significantly higher average intercept for the maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) treatment group (29.67) than in the rigid internal fixation (RIF) treatment group (25.38). Meanwhile, the increase in GOHAI scores over time was significantly greater in the RIF group than in the MMF group, resulting in scores being comparable between groups after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: By implication, patients with MMF self-report fewer problems in the early days after placement of the intra-arch wire compared with patients with RIF.     

Comparing the Impact of Oral Disease in Two Populations of Older Adults: Application of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index

Objectives : This study compares the distributional and psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in two samples of older adults, and examines how the self-perceived impact of oral disease, as measured by the GOHAI, varies in accordance with sample sociodemographic and health characteristics. Methods : Results are based on survey data from two samples of older men: a Medicare sample of patients using community physicians (n=799; mean age=74) and users of VA ambulatory health care (n=542; mean age=72). Results : The findings indicated significant differences between samples in mean GOHAI scores, with the VA sample exhibiting worse scores. A number of similarities in psychometric properties of the instrument across the two samples were found: high internal consistency reliability and similar inter-item and item-scale correlations. Factor analyses revealed somewhat different structures between the two samples, but explained similar amounts of variance; regression analyses indicated that income and self-rated oral health were significant predictors of GOHAI scores in both samples. Conclusions : The GOHAI exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties in both samples and is sensitive to sociodemographic differences among and between two samples of older men. Results suggest continued use of the GOHAI as an indicator of the impact of oral conditions on functioning and well-being in a variety of samples.     

Can caregivers be used in assessing oral health‐related quality of life among patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions?

Abstract – Objectives: To assess the agreement between patients’ and caregivers’ (CGs) assessment of patients’ oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) during the acute stage of their hospitalization. Methods: A sample of 161 consecutive patients admitted to hospital following stroke and their CGs. Patients and CGs were interviewed independently about the impact of oral health status on the life quality of the patient employing the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). Agreement of impact was assessed by comparison (agreement at the group level) and correlation analyses (agreement of individual patient–CG pairs). Results: The response rate was 76% with 121 pairs of patients and CGs participating. At the group level, variations in patient's own and CG GOHAI scores were found (P < 0.001). The CGs underestimated the impact of oral health on life quality, particularly with respect to aspects of psychosocial functioning compared with patients’ own perceptions. However, the bias in reports was small (standardized difference = 0.43). The mean absolute difference in overall scores constituted 8% of the possible range of GOHAI scores. At the individual patient–CG pair level, the intraclass correlation coefficient for GOHAI scores was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61–0.82), indicating substantial agreement. Conclusion: At the group and individual level there was adequate agreement between patients’ and CGs’ assessment of patients’ OHRQoL during the acute stage of their hospitalization. The findings have implications in the use of CGs as proxies in assessing oral health when patients’ own assessment may be difficult to obtain.     

儿童口腔健康影响程度量表的研制

目的评价儿童口腔健康影响程度量表（CPQ11- 14）中文版的信度和效度,探讨其在中国儿童中应用的可行性。方法对CPQ11- 14进行翻译、回译、文化调适和改造,建立儿童口腔健康影响程度量表中文版。使用该量表和口腔健康自我评价表对南宁市218名11～14岁中、小学生进行口腔健康检查和口腔健康相关生存质量调查,考评量表的信度和效度。结果口腔健康影响程度量表的重测信度系数为0.82（P<0.001）,内部一致性Cronbach′s α系数为0.79。通过因子分析提取的5个因子显示,口腔健康影响程度量表存在预想的连带关系和逻辑关系。量表得分与自我评价的口腔健康状态、自我感觉口腔健康对生活质量的影响间有明显相关性,其相关系数分别为- 0.33和0.50（P<0.000 5）。量表得分与龋失补牙指数呈明显正相关（P<0.001）,与中学组错畸形情况（美牙指数）也呈正相关（P<0.05）。结论本量表具有良好的信度和效度,为在中国进一步推广应用提供了理论依据。