Ulnar shortening osteotomy with a premounted sliding-hole plate

BACKGROUND: Ulnar shortening osteotomy represents a common procedure for various ulnar-sided wrist disorders but is still associated with complications like malrotation, angulation, or nonunion because of incomplete closure of the osteotomy gap. We describe the use of a newly developed palmarly placed sliding-hole dynamic compression plate that allows fixation of the ulna before the oblique osteotomy is carried out. METHODS: We performed ulnar shortening osteotomy on 27 consecutive patients. The indication was ulnar impaction syndrome in 25 patients and symptomatic ulnar plus variance secondary to malunited distal radial fracture in 2 patients. The mean preoperative ulnar variance was +2.1 mm (range, +1 mm to +8 mm). All patients were evaluated before and after surgery and graded with the Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) scoring system. RESULTS: All 27 osteotomies healed uneventfully over an average of 9.2 +/- 2.1 weeks. The mean postoperative ulnar variance was -2.1 mm (range, -3.1 mm to 0 mm). There were significant improvements in DASH score, pain, and grip strength at an average follow-up of 8.1 months. Six patients complained of plate irritation. CONCLUSION: Favorable results suggest that ulnar shortening osteotomy using an oblique osteotomy and a premounted sliding-hole compression plate avoids malrotation and angulation and is associated with satisfactory outcomes. This device does not require an assisting device, which minimizes the surgical exposure of the ulna. Palmar placement of the plate seems to reduce hardware irritation.     

Treatment of Madelung's deformity in adults by ulna reduction osteotomy

PURPOSE: Adult patients with Madelung's deformity may present with ulnar-sided wrist pain. Treatment often involves addressing the distal radial deformity. If there is focal wrist pathology and a positive ulnar variance, however, then an isolated ulnar-shortening osteotomy may provide symptomatic relief in these patients. The purpose of this study was to report our results of ulnar-shortening osteotomy without radial osteotomy in adult patients with Madulung's deformity. METHODS: From 1988 to 2001 9 wrists in 9 adult patients with Madelung's deformity and ulnar-sided wrist pain underwent ulnar-shortening osteotomy. The distal radius abnormality was not addressed. All of the patients were women and the average age at the time of surgery was 34 years (range, 29-45 y). Two of the individuals were mesomelic dwarfs and the remaining 7 patients were otherwise normal. Surgery was performed after the patients failed at least 6 months of nonsurgical management. RESULTS: All patients had improvement of their symptoms at an average follow-up evaluation of 42 months (range, 6-112 mo). All of the osteotomies united. One patient required replating for a delayed union. There were no infections and no ulnar carpal subluxation. Ulnar-positive variance correction averaged 4.4 mm. Postoperative range of motion and grip strength were equivalent to the contralateral wrist. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar-shortening osteotomy is a safe and reliable surgical procedure that can relieve ulnar-sided wrist pain in adult patients with symptomatic Madelung's deformity and positive ulnar variance.     

Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy with a new plate compression system

Purpose

The gold standard for treatment of ulnar impaction has become ulnar shortening osteotomy. Previous reports in the literature have shown not only good results with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain but also significant nonunion rates and painful hardware necessitating further surgery and potentially, metal removal. The purpose of this paper is to review the success rate of ulnar shortening osteotomy utilizing a low profile compression plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy.

Methods

Ninety-three patients with ulnar abutment syndrome underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy with the low profile osteotomy plate. There were 47 males and 46 females. The Acumed’s ulnar shortening system was utilized in all cases. The patients were evaluated for pain, range of motion, grip strength, return to work, time to union, and hardware removal. The patients’ results were validated using the Mayo Wrist Score.

Results

There was a 100 % union rate in the 93 patients. There were no nonunions or delayed unions, or any hardware removal. All patients noted an improvement in their ulnar-sided wrist pain. Utilizing the Mayo wrist classification, the average postoperative score was 84.5. The average preoperative Mayo score was 49.4, for an average increase of 35.1 points.

Conclusion

The Acumed’s low-contact plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy demonstrated 100 % union rate and no implant removal in our series. This is the largest study to our knowledge of a series of ulnar shortening osteotomies and successful healing without the removal of any implants. Furthermore, the specifically designed ulnar shortening osteotomy plate significantly simplifies the procedure for the surgeon and improves patient outcomes with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain.     

Ulnar impaction

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common source of ulnar-sided wrist pain. It is a degenerative condition that occurs secondary to excessive load across the ulnocarpal joint, resulting in a spectrum of pathologic changes and symptoms. It may occur in any wrist but is usually associated with positive ulnar variance, whether congenital or acquired. The diagnosis of ulnar impaction syndrome is made by clinical examination and is supported by radiographic studies. Surgery is indicated if nonoperative treatment fails. Although a number of alternatives exist, the 2 primary surgical options are ulnar-shortening osteotomy or partial resection of the distal dome of the ulna (wafer procedure). This article discusses the etiology of ulnar impaction syndrome, and its diagnosis and treatment.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunited distal radius fractures: results of a 7-year follow-up with special regard to the grade of radial displacement and post-operative ulnar variance

Introduction

The treatment of ulnar-sided wrist pain after malunited distal radius fractures remains controversial. Radial corrective osteotomy can restore congruity in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as adequate length of the radius. Ulnar shortening osteotomies leave the radius’ angular deformities unchanged, risking secondary DRUJ osteoarthritis. We supposed that, even within the widely accepted limit of 20°, a greater angulation of the radius in the sagittal plane correlates with a higher rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis. Furthermore, we suspected worse results from an ulna shortened to a negative rather than a neutral or positive ulnar variance.

Materials and methods

For this retrospective study, we reviewed 23 patients a mean 7.2 (range 5.6–8.5) years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures. We compared 14 patients with up to 10° dorsal or palmar displacement from the normal palmar tilt of 10° to 9 patients with more than 10° displacement, and 15 patients whose post-operative ulnar variance was neutral or positive to 8 who had a negative one.

Results

Ulnar-sided wrist pain decreased enough to satisfy 21 of the 23 patients. Clinical results tended to be better when radial displacement was minor and when post-operative ulnar variance was positive or neutral. A shorter ulna significantly increased the rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis, whereas a greater degree of radial displacement only increased the rate slightly.

Conclusions

Radial corrective osteotomy should be discussed as alternative when displacement of the radius in the sagittal plane exceeds 10°. The ulna should be shortened moderately to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis in the distal radioulnar joint.     

Arthroscopic treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Ulnar impaction syndrome occurs in the setting of a central traumatic or degenerative defect in the triangular fibrocartilage complex in patients with ulnar positive variance. Chondral and subchondral edema, mechanical impingement of the articular disc, and chondromalacia of the distal ulna, proximal lunate, and proximal triquetrum produce symptoms with activity that do not improve with rest. Decreasing ulnocarpal load-sharing across the wrist with recession of the distal ulna is necessary to relieve symptoms in the majority of patients. Arthroscopic treatment with triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic ulnar wafer resection is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. It affords a single-stage, minimally invasive approach, with similar efficacy and fewer complications than open wafer resection or ulnar shortening osteotomy.     

Radial osteotomy for Kienböck disease

Of various surgical treatments, radial shortening for patients with negative ulnar variance and radial wedge osteotomy (radial closing osteotomy) for patients with 0 or positive ulnar variance are widely accepted for the treatment of Kienb?ck disease. Long-term follow-up studies have shown more than 10 years lasting satisfactory pain relief, as well as an increase in wrist range of motion and grip strength. As representative surgical procedures, the techniques of radial shortening by transverse osteotomy, using a locking compression plate for internal fixation, and radial wedge osteotomy by step-cut osteotomy, using a small dynamic compression plate or locking compression plate, are described. One important point of radial wedge osteotomy is that resection of simple wedge bone yields a decrease in ulnar variance; therefore, we recommend trapezoidal bone resection with ulnar height of 1 mm for transverse osteotomy at the metaphysis and ulnar height of 2 mm for step-cut osteotomy at the distal fourth of the radius.     

Staged reconstruction for malunited fractures of the distal radius

This prospective study assessed the outcomes of 26 symptomatic malunited distal radial fractures which were treated with an opening wedge corrective osteotomy and bone grafting with rigid fixation. An ulnar shortening osteotomy was subsequently required as a second-stage operation in five cases to restore normal ulnar variance. A wrist arthroscopy was indicated as a third stage procedure with persistent ulnar sided wrist pain in order to address central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage. Satisfactory functional scores were achieved by 20 of the 26 patients after distal radial osteotomy alone and, 24 of the 26 after subsequent ulnar shortening osteotomies and arthroscopy when necessary. The one, two or three stage concept of reconstructing the malunited distal end radius could optimise the outcome rather than using a single-stage strategy.     

Comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy and the wafer resection procedure as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome

A retrospective review was performed that compared the results of 2 different surgical treatments for ulnar impaction syndrome in 22 patients over a 6-year period. Ulnar shortening osteotomy and wafer distal ulna resection (wafer resection procedure) were each performed in 11 patients based on the preference of 3 individual hand surgeons. All patients presented with ulnar wrist pain and positive ulnar variance on either neutral rotation or pronated-grip x-rays and each failed conservative management. At a minimum follow-up time of 18 months, 9 patients had good to excellent results following ulnar shortening osteotomy compared with 8 following the wafer resection procedure. This difference was not statistically significant. All patients regained functional wrist motion and 21 of the 22 patients had satisfactory pain relief. There was 1 poor result in the wafer group that required revision to complete resection of the distal ulna. Five secondary procedures were required in the osteotomy group to remove painful hardware and union was delayed in 2 patients. Although ulnar shortening osteotomy provides effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome, the wafer resection procedure provides favorable pain relief and restoration of function but without the potential for nonunion or hardware removal. (J Hand Surg 2000; 25A:55-60.     

Arthroscopic distal ulna resection after post traumatic ulno carpal abutment

Ulno carpal abutments secondary to the sequels of a fracture of the radius are often due to the inversion of the distal radio ulnar index by shortening relative to the radius. This positive ulnar variance eventually leads to an abutment between the head of the ulnar and the proximal articular face of the lunate with alteration of the cartilaginous carpal surfaces. The wrist arthroscopy makes diagnosis and treatment possible in a less invasive way. The patients are operated on as outpatients under local regional anaesthetic using a pneumatic tourniquet. The arthroscope is positioned using the 3-4 radio carpal opening permitting exploration of the joint. The surgical treatment is performed by arthroscopy using a burr and going in through the 6R radio carpal opening. In this way we use the technique of partial resection of the distal ulna. We have a series of 62 patients who have benefited from the technique of partial resection of the ulnar head by arthroscopy. There were 30 men and 32 women. The average age was 66 years old (between 45 and 82). Our average follow-up is 32 months (between 12 and 60 months). Recovery of mobility was immediate in all cases with persistent pain in the radio ulnar joint in 8 cases. Arthroscopic treatment of ulno carpal abutment has proved itself effective and innocuous. It should nevertheless be reserved for operations on small sized inversions of the distal radio ulnar index (less than 5 mm). In the event of larger ulnar variances we prefer ulnar shortening osteotomy. The other techniques will be restricted to cases where the distal radio ulnar joint has been impaired.     

TFCC lesions. Diagnosis and therapy

Lesions of the TFCC may have degenerative or post-traumatic causes. Distal radioulnar joint as well as the ulnocarpal joint can be affected. Patients present with ulnar-sided wrist pain especially in forearm rotation. Therapy depends on the degree of lesions and additional pathology. Wrist arthroscopy offers a certain diagnostic tool. In addition, adequate therapy can be realized. After failed arthroscopic therapy, ulnar shortening osteotomy reduces ulnar load significantly.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome can be defined as a degenerative condition of the ulnar aspect of the wrist in patients with congenital or dynamic positive ulnar variance without a history of fracture or premature physeal arrest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and the outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for this group of patients. METHODS: Thirty-one wrists in twenty-nine patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome were treated with an ulnar shortening osteotomy. Ulnar variance was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the wrist, and radioulnar distance was measured on a lateral radiograph, with the forearm in neutral rotation, to evaluate any displacement of the ulnar head from the distal aspect of the radius. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of thirty-two months. RESULTS: An average preoperative ulnar variance of +4.6 mm (range, 2 to 7.5 mm) was reduced to an average of -0.7 mm (range, -4 to +1 mm) postoperatively. Preoperatively, the modified Gartland and Werley score was an average (and standard deviation) of 69.5 +/- 7.6, with twenty-four wrists rated poor and seven rated fair. Postoperatively, the score improved to an average of 92.5 +/- 8.0, with twenty-four wrists rated excellent; five, good; one, fair; and one, poor. Dorsal subluxation of the distal aspect of the ulna was found concomitantly in nine wrists, and it was found to be reduced by the shortening osteotomy. Seven patients had cystic changes in the carpal bones preoperatively, but these were not evident one to two years after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar shortening osteotomy improved wrist function in patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and reduced the subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint, which is commonly found in these patients. Degenerative cystic changes of the ulnar carpal bones appear to resolve following the shortening osteotomy.     

The "ulnar fovea sign" for defining ulnar wrist pain: an analysis of sensitivity and specificity

PURPOSE: Eliciting tenderness in the region of the ulnar fovea is a possibly useful clinical test for defining the source of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Until now, no reports of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of this test have been available. Based on anecdotal observations, a hypothesis was developed stating that ulnar fovea tenderness (positive "ulnar fovea sign") is sensitive and specific in detecting two ulnar-sided wrist conditions: foveal disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments and ulnotriquetral (UT) ligament injuries. METHODS: The clinical records of 272 consecutive patients with wrist arthroscopy performed by the senior author from 1998 through to 2005 were reviewed. Relevant clinical and surgical data were abstracted. The ulnar fovea sign test is executed by pressing the examiner's thumb distally into the interval between the ulnar styloid process and flexor carpi ulnaris tendon, between the volar surface of the ulnar head and the pisiform. A positive ulnar fovea sign is designated when there is exquisite tenderness that the patient claims replicates their pain, with comparisons made with the contralateral side. RESULTS: There were a total of 90 foveal disruptions and 68 UT ligament injuries diagnosed during wrist arthroscopy. The ulnar fovea sign was positive in 156 patients. The sensitivity of the fovea sign in detecting foveal disruptions and/or UT ligament injuries was 95.2%. Its specificity was 86.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis stating that the ulnar fovea sign is a useful clinical maneuver to detect foveal disruptions and UT ligament tears is supported. The conditions represent 2 common sources of ulnar-sided wrist pain. The differentiation between the 2 conditions may be made clinically, where UT ligament tears are typically associated with a stable distal radioulnar joint and foveal disruptions are typically associated with an unstable distal radioulnar joint. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.     

L’ostéotomie du capitatum dans la maladie de Kienböck. Résultats cliniques et radiologiques à cinq ans de recul moyen. À propos de 12 cas

Kienböck's disease could occur pain and reduce wrist's range of motion despite of an early radiologic staging. Usual surgical procedures unload the lunate. Radial shortening is the common procedure in negative ulnar variance. For wrists with neutral or positive ulnar variance, this procedure could produce a distal radio-ulnar discrepancy and an ulnocarpal impingement. We perform, in these cases, a capitate shortening. The goal of this study is to relate the wrist functional outcome and the radiological result in 12 cases. It was a consecutive retrospective study of 12 patients (nine male, three female). Eight Lichtman's stage II and four stage III A with neutral or positive ulnar variance. The wrists were painful and with a reduce range of motion. The surgical procedure consisted in a dorsal approach and a 2-mm shortening osteotomy in the capitate's waist. Bone clips were used for fixation. The follow-up average period was 65.8 months. All patients had pain relief. The wrist's range of motion improved in all cases. Any single complication was noted. The patients recovered their professional or usual occupation with an average of 3.6 months. Lunate's vascularization improved in all cases. Any intracarpal complication or capitate non-union occured. The capitate shortening is a simple and low aggressive procedure. Wrist's functional outcome has good results. We recommend this procedure for symptomatic patients in early Kienböck's disease with neutral or positive ulnar variance.     

Corrective osteotomy for malunion of the distal radius

Positive ulnar variance due to inadequate correction of radial length is a common disorder after radial corrective osteotomy. To avoid this complication we performed a combination of ulnar-shortening osteotomy and radial corrective osteotomy in 6 of 22 radial corrections. The indication for the combined procedure was a relative ulnar length of minimally 6 mm. The functional outcome was fair in 1 and good in 5 cases with combined osteotomy. Overall, the functional results were good in 17 cases, and pain in the distal radioulnar joint was observed in 3 of 22 patients. Positive ulnar variance was the reason for pain in only 1 patient. Eventually, 2 hemiresections of the ulnar head (Bower's arthroplasty) were performed. It appears that a combination of ulnar shortening and radial osteotomy is a reliable technique, which can reduce symptoms and need for secondary operations on the ulnar side of the wrist.     

Indikation und Ergebnisse der Ulnaverkürzungsosteotomie bei ulnokarpalem Handgelenksschmerz

The ulnar impaction syndrome is proven to be a common source of ulnar sided wrist pain. Ulna-shortening osteotomy represents a successful therapy for this kind of problem, both congenital or posttraumatic positive ulnar variance. Positive variance resulting from a distal radius fracture needs correct dorsal and radial angulation of the radius. In case of congenital positive variance arthroscopic debridement for decompression of the TFCC should be performed first. The adequate correction of the length is the major problem. Disorders of the distal radioulnar joint may result due to overcorrection. Oblique osteotomy using 7-hole-plates is our preferred treatment.     

Long-term outcome of radial shortening with or without ulnar shortening for treatment of Kienbock's disease: a 13-25 year follow-up

Fourteen of 35 patients who underwent radial shortening with or without ulnar shortening for the treatment of Kienbock's disease were followed up for a median of 19 (range, 13-25) years. Radial shortening was performed for patients with ulnar negative or neutral variance, and combined shortening of radius and ulna for those with ulnar positive variance. Overall the clinical situation was significantly improved at the final follow-up. There was no significant advanced collapse of the wrists and Lichtman's stage of disease increased in only three cases. Although osteoarthritic changes in the distal radio-ulnar joint progressed in five patients, this may have little influence on clinical outcome. Radial shortening osteotomy is a reliable method for treatment of Kienbock's disease.     

Acute compartment syndrome of the forearm in association with ulnar shortening osteotomy: a case report

A 41-year-old man experienced severe pain in the forearm after undergoing ulnar shortening osteotomy to treat positive ulnar variance, a complication of a fracture of the distal end of the radius. The patient had compartment syndrome with compartment pressure of 55 mm Hg. A decompressive fasciotomy of the volar compartment provided total relief of pain and, subsequently, full recovery of all functions. We report the case and discuss the serious nature of compartment syndrome, its associated complications, and methods of diagnosis and management.     

Simultaneous radial closing wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomies for distal radius malunion

PURPOSE: Closing wedge osteotomies are an attractive treatment option for distal radius malunion in patients with osteopenia; however, they require an ulnar head resection to accommodate closure of corrective osteotomy and to address the issue of ulnocarpal abutment. The literature contains little information on concomitant ulnar shortening osteotomy despite a physiologic solution. We report the functional and radiographic outcomes of 5 patients treated for symptomatic distal radius malunion with simultaneous radial closing wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomies. METHODS: All 5 patients were women aged 52 to 69 years (average, 61 years). Four patients had extra-articular radius fractures with dorsal angulation (20-22 degrees ) and shortening (3-7/mm); the other had the fracture with volar angulation (24 degrees ) and shortening (11 mm). Through a volar approach an appropriate amount of bone wedge was removed from the distal radius. A small volar T-plate was used to secure the osteotomized bone fragment. Six to 11 mm of ulnar shortening osteotomy was performed by using transverse osteotomy and compression plating technique with an AO compression device. RESULTS: In all 5 wrists healing of radial and ulnar osteotomies occurred less than 3 months after surgery. There were no postsurgical complications. Postsurgical radiographs showed that the volar tilt angle of the radius was reduced to normal range (range, 8-15 degrees ) in all wrists. The ulnar variance was 0 mm in 4 wrists and 2 mm in 1 wrist. There were significant improvements in pain, function, and range of motion at an average follow-up evaluation of 17 months. The average grip strength as a percentage of the opposite side improved from 30% before to 73% after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that closing wedge osteotomy of the radius concomitant with ulnar shortening osteotomy is technically and functionally adequate. Our procedure is indicated for patients with osteopenia for whom opening wedge osteotomy of the radius is inadequate.     

Surgical correction of Madelung’s deformity by combined corrective radioulnar osteotomy: 14 cases with four-year minimum follow-up

Fourteen wrists in 11 girls, mean age 13.3 years (range 9–16) at surgery, were treated for Madelung’s deformity. The presenting complaint was incapacitating pain. All were treated by radial closing wedge osteotomy and ulnar shortening osteotomy. The dorsal retinaculum was also surgically repaired in six cases. At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range 4–8.75), we observed improved range of motion in both flexion/extension and pronation/supination and absence of pain during daily activity. Radiographically, positioning of the distal radial articular surface and lunate subsidence were improved. Union was obtained after all osteotomies without secondary procedures. Posterior displacement of the ulnar head persisted in two wrists. Combined radioulnar osteotomy restored the anatomy to as near normal as possible. This technique provides satisfactory and encouraging results and does not compromise the surgical future of the wrist. However, longer follow-up is required to assess recurrence or possible long-term degenerative consequences.