Prevention of erosive oesophagitis relapse with pantoprazole

AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole and ranitidine in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. METHODS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients (349) with endoscopically documented healed erosive oesophagitis (grade 0 or 1) were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole (10, 20 or 40 mg/q.d.s.) or ranitidine (150 mg/b.d.). Erosive oesophagitis status was assessed endoscopically at months 1, 3, 6 and 12 or when relapse symptoms appeared (relapse = reappearance of erosive oesophagitis grade 2 within 12 months). Symptom-free days were also assessed. RESULTS: Pantoprazole 20- and 40-mg were significantly more effective than ranitidine in maintaining healing regardless of initial erosive oesophagitis grade. Response was dose-related. After 12 months 78, 55, 46 and 21% of patients remained healed (40-, 20-, 10-mg pantoprazole and ranitidine). Pantoprazole 40-mg produced significantly more symptom-free days (83%) than ranitidine (58%). Heartburn-free days/nights were significantly higher with pantoprazole 40-mg (92 and 93%) than ranitidine (73 and 77%). The most frequent reason for discontinuation, unsatisfactory efficacy, occurred most often with ranitidine (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Once-daily pantoprazole therapy prevented relapse of healed erosive oesophagitis more effectively than ranitidine and with fewer heartburn days. Response to pantoprazole was dose-related. Pantoprazole 40-mg was the most effective regimen and consistent in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing with a good safety and tolerability profile.     

Esomeprazole 20 mg vs. pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy of healed erosive oesophagitis: results from the EXPO study

BACKGROUND: Following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis, most patients require maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. AIM: To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission rates over 6 months' maintenance therapy with esomeprazole or pantoprazole (both 20 mg once daily) in patients with healed erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis at baseline were randomized to receive esomeprazole 40 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for up to 8 weeks. Patients with healed erosive oesophagitis and free of moderate/severe heartburn and acid regurgitation at 4 weeks or, if necessary, 8 weeks entered the 6-month maintenance therapy phase of the study. RESULTS: A total of 2766 patients (63% men; mean age 50 years) received esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 1377) or pantoprazole 20 mg (n = 1389) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. Following 6 months of treatment, the proportion of patients in endoscopic and symptomatic remission was significantly greater for those receiving esomeprazole 20 mg (87.0%) than pantoprazole 20 mg (74.9%, log-rank test P < 0.0001). Esomeprazole 20 mg produced a higher proportion of patients free of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and fewer discontinuations because of symptoms than pantoprazole 20 mg (92.2% vs. 88.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole 20 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis and relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.     

Pantoprazole provides rapid and sustained symptomatic relief in patients treated for erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Effective symptom control is a primary concern of most heartburn suffers. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole, placebo and the H2 antagonist nizatidine in relieving symptoms in patients with erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Data from two randomized, double-blind studies were pooled. Patients received pantoprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg, or placebo daily (study 1, n = 603), or pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg daily or 150-mg nizatidine b.d. (study 2, n = 243) for either 4 or 8 weeks. Endoscopy was performed at baseline, week 4 and week 8. Persistent absence of symptoms was defined as the first day that no symptoms were reported by the patient on that day or any subsequent study day. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage (P < 0.05) of pantoprazole patients reported elimination of all symptoms by week 8. Daytime heartburn, night-time heartburn and regurgitation were significantly better controlled with pantoprazole (with a dose-response at most time-points). Absence of symptoms was a powerful predictor of healing; presence of symptoms correlated poorly. CONCLUSION: Pantoprazole is more effective than placebo or nizatidine for controlling heartburn and acid regurgitation in patients with erosive oesophagitis. Relief of GERD symptoms is highly predictive of healing of erosive oesophagitis at 4 and 8 weeks.     

Pantoprazole maintenance therapy prevents relapse of erosive oesophagitis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole with ranitidine for the maintenance of endoscopically documented healed (grade 0 or 1) erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients (371) were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg or ranitidine 150 mg. Endoscopies were performed after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months or when symptoms suggesting relapse (grade = 2) developed. Gastric biopsies were obtained at baseline and on at least one postbaseline visit. Symptom-free days and Gelusil use were assessed. RESULTS: Pantoprazole was significantly (P < 0.001) more effective in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. After 12 months, 33%, 40%, 68% and 82% of patients remained healed for the ranitidine and pantoprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg groups, respectively. Daytime and night-time heartburn were eliminated in > 90% of days for the pantoprazole 40 mg group. Gelusil use was significantly lower with pantoprazole 20 and 40 mg than with ranitidine (P < 0.02) during the first 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of maintenance therapy with pantoprazole (10-40 mg once daily) was superior to ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. Pantoprazole 40 mg provided the most consistent efficacy and was well tolerated.     

Daily treatment with esomeprazole is superior to that taken on-demand for maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: On-demand therapy with esomeprazole is effective for long-term treatment of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it has not been evaluated in erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS: To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission over a 6-month period when patients with healed erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are treated with esomeprazole 20 mg, either once daily or on-demand. METHODS: Patients with verified erosive reflux oesophagitis of Los Angeles grades A-D were enrolled. Following 4-8 weeks treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily, those who were endoscopically healed and had symptom control during the last week were randomized to maintenance therapy for 6 months with esomeprazole 20 mg, taken either once daily or on-demand. RESULTS: Of 539 enrolled patients, 494 (91%) were healed at 8 weeks and 477 were randomized to maintenance therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg, 243 once daily and 234 on-demand. After once daily treatment, 81% of patients were still in remission at 6 months, compared with only 58% who took on-demand treatment (P < 0.0001). A difference in remission was found irrespective of baseline grade of oesophagitis, but it was more pronounced for the more severe grades. There was no difference in overall symptomatic remission between the two treatments, although heartburn was significantly more prevalent in the on-demand group. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily esomeprazole 20 mg was better than that taken on-demand for maintaining healed erosive oesophagitis, regardless of baseline Los Angeles grade.     

Comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability of 20 mg pantoprazole and 20 mg omeprazole in patients with grade I reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have shown that pantoprazole (40 mg) and omeprazole (40 or 20 mg) have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of grade II-IV reflux oesophagitis (Savary-Miller classification). AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of pantoprazole (20 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) with respect to symptom relief and healing of patients with grade I reflux oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically established grade I reflux oesophagitis (non-confluent, patchy red lesions with/without white fibrin coating) were enrolled into this randomized, open, parallel-group, multicentre study. A total of 328 patients (n=166 in the pantoprazole group, n=162 in the omeprazole group) were recruited in 23 centres. Patients received 4 weeks of treatment. If the reflux oesophagitis was not completely healed, the treatment was extended to 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment with either pantoprazole or omeprazole, the rate of symptom relief was similar (70% vs. 79% and 77% vs. 84%, respectively). High healing rates were observed after 4 and 8 weeks (pantoprazole: 84% and 90%, respectively; omeprazole: 89% and 95%, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events on pantoprazole and omeprazole, respectively, were nausea (8% vs. 7%), diarrhoea (5% vs. 6%) and headache (6% vs. 3%). CONCLUSIONS: After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole (20 mg) or omeprazole (20 mg), patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (grade I) showed comparably high rates of symptom relief and healing. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated.     

A randomized comparative study of esomeprazole 40 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg for healing erosive oesophagitis: the EXPO study

AIM: To assess the efficacy of the 8-week therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg for healing erosive oesophagitis (EE) as part of a management study. METHODS: Patients had a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms (> or =6 months) and had suffered heartburn on at least 4 of the 7 days preceding enrollment. Endoscopies were performed to grade EE severity using the Los Angeles (LA) classification system at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks (if unhealed at 4 weeks). Heartburn severity was recorded by patients on diary cards. The primary end point was healing of EE by week 8 of treatment. RESULTS: Of 3170 patients randomized, the intent-to-treat population consisted of 3151 patients (63% male, mean age: 50.6 years, 27% Helicobacter pylori-positive). Esomeprazole 40 mg healed a significantly greater proportion of EE patients than pantoprazole 40 mg at both 4 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 81%, pantoprazole 75%, P < 0.001) and 8 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 96%, pantoprazole 92%, P < 0.001). The median time to reach sustained heartburn resolution was 6 days in patients receiving esomeprazole and 8 days with pantoprazole (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 40 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg for healing EE and providing resolution of associated heartburn.     

Efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 40 mg versus 80 mg in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole is a substituted benzimidazole which is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion by its action upon H+, K+- ATPase. METHODS: Pantoprazole 40 mg and 80 mg were compared in a randomized double-blind study in 192 out-patients with stage II or III (Savary-Miller classification) reflux oesophagitis. Patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 97) or pantoprazole 80 mg (n = 95), once daily before breakfast for 4 weeks. Treatment was extended for a further 4 weeks if the oesophagitis had not healed. RESULTS: After 4 weeks complete healing of the reflux oesophagitis was seen in 78% of protocol-correct patients given pantoprazole 40 mg daily (n = 86), and in 72% in the 80 mg (n = 87) group. The cumulative healing rates after 8 weeks were 95 and 94%, respectively (P > 0.05, Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel), and time until healing of oesophagitis comparable in both groups. Differences between doses were also not significant in an intention-to-treat analysis. Both dosing schedules were well tolerated and the patients experienced remarkable symptom relief. No adverse event or changes in laboratory values of clinical significance could definitely be ascribed to the trial medication. CONCLUSION: The 40 mg pantoprazole dosage is comparable to 80 mg in reflux oesophagitis, both in efficacy and tolerability.     

Sleep dysfunction in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and response to GERD therapy, a pilot study

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the prevalence of pathological sleep disorders in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and whether pharmacological treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease will lead to improvement in sleep. AIMS: This pilot study determined the prevalence of sleep disorder in patients with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, correlated subjective (questionnaire) and objective (actigraphy - a watch worn on the wrist that monitors motion to help differentiate sleep from awake states) assessment of sleep dysfunction and determined whether therapeutic resolution of oesophageal symptoms was associated with an improvement in sleep. METHODS: Eighteen patients with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Assessments at 0, 4 and 8 weeks included: Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire and ambulatory wrist actigraphy. RESULTS: Unrecognized sleep disturbance occurred in 81% of this cohort of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and erosive oesophagitis. Median reflux syndrome score (heartburn and acid regurgitation) on Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale decreased from 2 at baseline to 0 at weeks 4 and 8 (P 相似文献   

Lansoprazole heals erosive reflux oesophagitis in patients with Barrett's oesophagus

Background : Barrett's oesophagus is thought to be a complication of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Aim : To determine whether the proton pump inhibitor, lansoprazole, is effective in healing erosive reflux oesophagitis in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.
Methods : An 8-week, randomized, double-blind study was conducted using patients with both erosive reflux oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus. Erosive reflux oesophagitis was defined as grades 2–4 oesophagitis; Barrett's oesophagus, as specialized columnar epithelium obtained by biopsy from the tubular oesophagus; and healing, as a return to grade 0 or 1 oesophageal mucosa (complete re-epithelialization). One-hundred and five (105) patients from one centre were randomized to receive either lansoprazole 30 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Unhealed or symptomatic lansoprazole patients at week 4 were randomized to receive the same 30 mg dose daily or an increased dose of 60 mg daily. Endoscopy was performed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8.
Results : The treatment groups were similar in regards to baseline characteristics, erosive reflux oesophagitis grades and length of Barrett's oesophagus. At each 2-week interval, lansoprazole patients had significantly greater healing rates and less day and night heartburn and regurgitation than ranitidine patients. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in antacid use, quality of life parameters, or rate of reported adverse events. Median values for fasting serum gastrin levels remained within the normal range for both groups.
Conclusion : In patients with both Barrett's oesophagus and erosive reflux oesophagitis, lansoprazole is significantly more effective than ranitidine in relieving reflux symptoms and healing erosive reflux oesophagitis.     

Pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a European multicentre study

Background: Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole which inhibits gastric H⁺,K⁺-ATPase. Methods: In this double-blind, multicentre study, pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was compared with omeprazole 20 mg once daily in the treatment of grade II and III (Savary–Miller) reflux oesophagitis. Endoscopy was repeated after 4 weeks of treatment, and also after 8 weeks in patients unhealed at 4 weeks. Results: The primary efficacy variable was ulcer healing; after 4 weeks, 81/103 (78.6%) patients in the pantoprazole group and 83/105 (79.0%) patients in the omeprazole group had healed completely. After 8 weeks, the cumulative healing rates were 94.2% and 91.4 % in the pantoprazole and omeprazole groups, respectively (P > 0.05 at 4 weeks and 8 weeks). Both groups experienced rapid relief of the key symptoms: heartburn, acid regurgitation and pain on swallowing. The time course of relief of the individual symptoms was similar in both groups after 2 and 4 weeks (P > 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with only three patients withdrawing owing to adverse events. Conclusion: Pantoprazole has been shown to be as effective as omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.     

A double-blind study of pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis : a multicentre trial

Background: Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole which is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion by its action upon H⁺,K⁺-ATPase. Aim:To compare pantoprazole 40 mg with omeprazol 20 mg as once daily dosing in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis (grades II and III). Methods: This double-blind, randomized, multicentre study included 286 patients. Patients were reendoscoped after 4 weeks, and continued to receive a further 4 weeks of treatment if they were not healed a this time. Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, complete healing occurred in 126/170 (74%) patients in the pantoprazole group and in 67/86 (78%) patients in the omeprazole group (per-protocol analysis). At 8 weeks, the corresponding healing rates were 153/170 (90%) and 81/86 (94%). The differences between the treatment groups were not significant (P= 0.57 and 0.34). Improvement in the principal symptoms of reflux oesophagitis was also very similar between the treatment groups, with 59% and 69% at 2 weeks, and 83% and 86% at 4 weeks, respectively, being free from any individual symptom. Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: This study has shown pantoprazole and omeprazole to be similarly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild to moderate reflux oesophagitis.     

Treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease with rabeprazole in primary and secondary care: does Helicobacter pylori infection affect proton pump inhibitor effectiveness?

BACKGROUND: The presence of the gastric pathogen, Helicobacter pylori influences acid suppression by proton pump inhibitors and treatment outcome in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To determine the influence of H. pylori infection on effectiveness of rabeprazole in primary and secondary care patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Patients from primary and secondary care centres with uninvestigated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (based on symptoms only) and investigated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (endoscopically confirmed oesophagitis or endoscopy-negative reflux disease) were tested for H. pylori and treated with rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4-8 weeks in a non-randomized, multicentre, open-label study. Primary end-point for treatment effectiveness was complete resolution of both heartburn and acid regurgitation at 4-8 weeks; secondary end-point was quality of life as registered with the Psychological General Well-being Index. RESULTS: Data of 1787 patients could be analysed; mean duration of treatment was 36.3 days. At the evaluation visit 76.9% were heartburn-free, 77.7% regurgitation-free and 71% had complete symptom resolution. Overall Psychological General Well-being Index scores improved accordingly. Treatment was equally effective in patients with or without H. pylori infection, but more effective in patients with oesophagitis when compared with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of rabeprazole in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is not affected by the presence of H. pylori infection.     

Systematic review: the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients

AIM: To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with either histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for patients with erosive oesophagitis or symptomatic heartburn. METHOD: We conducted randomized-controlled trials of non-continuous therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Because of variation in outcome measures statistical pooling of results was not possible. Results were analysed qualitatively. Four studies evaluated intermittent therapy of treatment 3 days a week with omeprazole 20 mg or daily with ranitidine which were not efficacious compared to a daily proton pump inhibitor. Famotidine 10 and 20 mg, ranitidine 75 mg and cimetidine 200 mg were efficacious in five on-demand studies for relief of symptomatic heartburn episodes. In three of four studies, evaluating only non-erosive (endoscopy-negative) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg and omeprazole 10 and 20 mg a day were efficacious using willingness to continue as an endpoint. Lansoprazole 30 mg and omeprazole 20 mg maintained symptom control in 60-70% of healed oesophagitis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist therapy is not effective in maintaining control in oesophagitis patients. H2-receptor antagonists are effective for relief of heartburn episodes. On-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy may work in a proportion of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.     

Maintenance therapy with pantoprazole 20 mg prevents relapse of reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors can be effective as maintenance therapy in reducing the relapse rate of reflux oesophagitis at a dose lower than that used for acute healing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=396, 18-88 years old) with healed reflux oesophagitis (grade II or III before healing) were included in this multinational, prospective, parallel-group, randomized double-blind study. They took oral pantoprazole 20 mg (n=203) or 40 mg (n=193), once daily for up to 12 months. Scheduled endoscopies were performed at entry, after 6 and 12 months, or when symptoms of at least moderate intensity were perceived on 3 consecutive days; symptoms were assessed every 3 months. The primary efficacy parameter was the time until endoscopically proven relapse of reflux oesophagitis occurred; the secondary parameters included tolerability, safety and time until symptomatic relapse occurred. RESULTS: Analysis was performed using the 'all-patients-treated' approach. Endoscopic relapse rates in the 20 mg group after 6 and 12 months were 16 and 29%, respectively; in the 40 mg group, they were 7 and 19%, respectively. Symptomatic relapse rates after 6 and 12 months were 14 and 21% in the 20 mg group and 10 and 17% in the 40 mg group, respectively. Pantoprazole 20 mg and 40 mg were well tolerated throughout the study; the type and frequency of adverse events reported were similar for both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The 20 mg dose was proven to be 'at least equivalent' to the 40 mg dose with respect to endoscopic and symptomatic relapse. The 20 mg once daily dose represents an effective and safe maintenance regimen for the majority of patients with healed reflux oesophagitis.     

Pantoprazole: an update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acid-related disorders

Pantoprazole (Protonix) is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor (PPI) that reduces gastric acid secretion. In combination with two antimicrobial agents (most commonly metronidazole, clarithromycin or amoxicillin) for 6-14 days, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily produced Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of 71-93.8% (intent-to-treat [ITT] or modified ITT analysis) in patients without known antibacterial resistance. Pantoprazole-containing triple therapy was at least as effective as omeprazole- and similar in efficacy to lansoprazole-containing triple therapy in large trials. In the treatment of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oral pantoprazole 40 mg/day was as effective as other PPIs (omeprazole, omeprazole multiple unit pellet system, lansoprazole and esomeprazole) and significantly more effective than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Pantoprazole 20 mg/day provided effective mucosal healing in patients with GORD and mild oesophagitis. Intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/day can be used in patients who are unable to take oral medication. Oral pantoprazole 20-40 mg/day for up to 24 months prevented relapse in most patients with healed GORD. According to preliminary data, oral pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg/day was effective at healing and preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related ulcers, and intravenous pantoprazole was at least as effective as intravenous ranitidine in preventing ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. Oral or intravenous pantoprazole up to 240 mg/day maintained target acid output levels in most patients with hypersecretory conditions, including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Oral and intravenous pantoprazole appear to be well tolerated in patients with acid-related disorders in short- and long-term trials. Tolerability with oral pantoprazole was similar to that with other PPIs or histamine H(2)-antagonists in short-term trials. Formal drug interaction studies have not revealed any clinically significant interactions between pantoprazole and other agents. In conclusion, pantoprazole is an effective agent in the management of acid-related disorders. As a component of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication and as monotherapy for the healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of GORD, pantoprazole has shown similar efficacy to other PPIs and greater efficacy than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Limited data suggest that it is also effective in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in preventing ulcer rebleeding. Pantoprazole is well tolerated with minimal potential for drug interactions. The availability of pantoprazole as both oral and intravenous formulations provides flexibility when the oral route of administration is not appropriate. Thus, pantoprazole is a valuable alternative to other PPIs in the treatment of acid-related disorders.     

Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without bile reflux

BACKGROUND: The dilation of oesophageal intercellular spaces, clearly apparent in transmission electron microscopy images, is a marker of cellular damage induced by acid. AIM: To analyse the presence of dilated intercellular spaces and to quantify the scores in controls and in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or duodenal gastro-oesophageal reflux accompanied by erosive or non-erosive reflux disease. METHODS: Thirty-eight symptomatic patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or duodenal gastro-oesophageal reflux and 12 asymptomatic controls, classified on the basis of pH-metry and bilimetry, underwent endoscopy. Six tissue biopsies were taken from the normal mucosa for light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy evaluation. Dilated intercellular spaces were measured on photomicrographs of the specimens (at least 100 transects were measured for each patient). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease had normal macroscopic mucosa but, at histology, five patients with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease had mild oesophagitis and one had moderate oesophagitis. Seven patients with duodenal gastro-oesophageal reflux had normal mucosa, whilst three with erosive duodenal gastro-oesophageal reflux had mild oesophagitis at histology. At transmission electron microscopy, all controls had dilated intercellular spaces of less than 1.69 microm. Each symptomatic patient had a mean dilated intercellular space value and a mean value of the maximum dilated intercellular space at least three or more times greater than that in controls (P < 0.001). No statistical differences were observed between erosive and non-erosive oesophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: The dilated intercellular space is an extremely sensitive marker of damage in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, duodenal gastro-oesophageal reflux and non-erosive reflux disease, and serves as the most appropriate marker of damage evaluation in non-erosive reflux disease reported to date. A mean dilated intercellular space of 0.74 micro m provides a cut-off score for damage. No quantitative or qualitative differences in dilated intercellular space scores were found between pure and mixed acid reflux.     

Esomeprazole

Esomeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, is the S-isomer of omeprazole and is the first such inhibitor to be developed as a single isomer. Esomeprazole provided better control of intragastric pH than omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in trials conducted in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or healthy volunteers (n = 20 to 115). In 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials esomeprazole 20 and/or 40mg for 8 weeks produced higher healing rates of erosive oesophagitis and better symptom control than omeprazole 20 mg in patients with GORD. Esomeprazole 10, 20 or 40mg once daily for 6 months maintained healing versus placebo (p < 0.001) in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed erosive oesophagitis in 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials. Similarly, symptom-driven on-demand use of esomeprazole effectively controlled symptoms of GORD (heartburn) for 6 months in 2 large placebo-controlled trials. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 7 days was as effective for eradication of Helicobacter pylori as longer omeprazole-based therapy in 2 randomised double-blind trials including about 450 patients each. Endoscopically confirmed ulcer healing 4 weeks after treatment initiation was reported in about 90% of patients with active duodenal ulcer in both treatment groups. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 10 days was more effective than esomeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of H. pylori in 233 patients.     

A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of standard-dose rabeprazole and high-dose omeprazole in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole has a faster onset of antisecretory action than omeprazole, and it is of interest to determine whether this translates into faster symptom relief in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS: To assess the relief from heartburn after 3 days of treatment with standard-dose rabeprazole or high-dose omeprazole (primary end-point). Secondary end-points included the decrease in score for other symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, healing rates and quantification of antacid use. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis were randomized to receive 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with rabeprazole (20 mg) or omeprazole (40 mg). Patients who were not healed after 4 weeks received a further 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients were screened, 251 patients were randomized and 230 patients completed the trial. The numbers of patients with relief from heartburn on day 4 were similar in the two groups (84% for rabeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 76-90%; 83% for omeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 75-89%). There were no significant differences between the treatments in the relief from other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms or in healing rates. The number of reports of severe heartburn during the first 3 days was higher in the omeprazole group (daytime heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 10.3% for omeprazole, P=0.005; night-time heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 9.8% for omeprazole, P=0.01; statistical comparisons defined post hoc). CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose rabeprazole was as effective as high-dose omeprazole in relieving symptoms by day 4 of treatment and in healing oesophageal lesions, but had a faster onset of action in patients with severe heartburn. This suggests that the improved pharmacological properties of rabeprazole translate into a clinically relevant advantage.     

Comparison of the effects of immediate-release omeprazole powder for oral suspension and pantoprazole delayed-release tablets on nocturnal acid breakthrough in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Many patients treated with a proton-pump inhibitor for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or erosive oesophagitis still have substantial night-time gastric acidity. A previous trial of a new immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension suggested that nocturnal gastric acidity could be more effectively controlled with a bedtime dose of immediate-release omeprazole than with a delayed-release proton-pump inhibitor administered before dinner or at bedtime. AIM: To compare the ability of immediate-release omeprazole with pantoprazole to control nocturnal gastric acidity, when they were dosed once daily and twice daily. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms received immediate-release omeprazole and pantoprazole in this open-label, randomized-crossover trial. Median gastric pH, the percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and the percentage of patients with nocturnal acid breakthrough, were evaluated with 24-h pH monitoring. RESULTS: Repeated once daily (bedtime) dosing with immediate-release omeprazole suspension produced significantly better nocturnal gastric acid control than repeated once daily (predinner) or twice daily (prebreakfast and bedtime) dosing with pantoprazole delayed-release tablets (median pH: 4.7 vs. 2.0 and 1.7; percentage of time pH > 4: 55 vs. 27 and 34; nocturnal acid breakthrough: 53 vs. 78 and 75). Twice daily dosing (prebreakfast and bedtime) with immediate-release omeprazole 20 and 40 mg achieved the best night-time control of gastric acidity. Repeated once daily bedtime dosing with immediate-release omeprazole 40 mg and twice daily dosing with pantoprazole 40 mg gave similar 24-h pH control. No safety issues were associated with either drug in this trial. CONCLUSIONS: Dosed once daily at bedtime, immediate-release omeprazole reduced nocturnal gastric acidity to a degree not observed with once daily dosing of delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors.