腰椎间盘突出症单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后对侧椎间孔形态变化分析

目的 探讨腰椎间盘突出症单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)术后对侧椎间孔形态变化的规律.方法 回顾性分析自2018-06-2019-10采用TLIF治疗的72例单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,其中52例术后手术节段对侧椎间孔面积增大(...     

复发性腰椎间盘突出症及其手术治疗进展

复发性腰椎间盘突出症(recurrent lumbar disc herniation,RLDH)是指腰椎间盘切除术后症状缓解至少6个月以上,原手术节段残留的椎间盘组织于手术侧或对侧再次突出引发神经症状。     

脊柱内镜治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的进展

<正>复发性腰椎间盘突出症(recurrent lumbar disc herniation,RLDH)通常指椎间盘切除术后症状缓解,其后出现同一节段同侧和(或)对侧椎间盘再次突出,引起相应的神经、马尾压迫症状~([1]),患病率在7%～24%~([2])。RLDH患者由于初次后路手术的原     

局麻联合骶管麻醉在经皮椎间孔镜手术中的镇痛作用分析

目的 探讨局麻联合骶管麻醉在经皮椎间孔镜手术中的镇痛作用.方法 纳入2019年9月～2021年9月本院采用经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)治疗的100例腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herni-ation,LDH)患者,随...     

经皮椎间孔镜与经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

目的 比较经皮椎间孔镜(percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy,PTED)与经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症(recurrent lumbar disc ...     

经椎间孔腰椎管减压椎体间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效

腰椎间盘切除术的复发率为5%~11%[1、2],其中大部分患者需要再次手术治疗。但是再次手术的满意度要低于初次手术,因为再次手术在处理瘢痕组织过程中,容易造成脊膜破裂和神经根受损[3]。2008年6月~2010年12月,我院采用经椎间孔腰椎管减压、椎体间融合术（transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF）治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者28例,临床效果良好,报告如下。     

经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术后复发性单节段腰椎间盘突出症

目的 探讨经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)治疗经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)后复发性单节段腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation...     

腰椎后路手术椎间融合器应用的专家共识

椎间融合器(interbody fusion cage)联合椎弓根钉棒系统实施腰椎后路减压融合内固定术是治疗腰椎退变性疾病如腰椎管狭窄症、腰椎滑脱症、腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎不稳等的常用手术方法,包括后路腰椎椎间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF)和经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融...     

腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔镜术后疼痛的治疗进展

腰椎间盘突出症( lumbar disc herniation,LDH)是由于纤维环破裂导致髓核等内容物突出,压迫硬膜囊及神经根等造成腰背部及下肢麻木、疼痛、乏力等一系列典型症状的疾病[1].目前,手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症具有良好的疗效,而手术方式也多种多样,既包括开放手术,也包含各种微创手术例如椎间孔镜手术,但术后常见慢性神经性疼痛和功能障碍[2].虽然经皮椎间孔镜手术有着更高的手术成功率和更低的并发症发生率[3] ,但术后疼痛依然是棘手的难题.为此,本文对治疗腰椎间盘突出症微创术后疼痛综述如下.     

椎间孔入路与椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术对腰椎间盘突出症合并侧隐窝狭窄的临床疗效分析

目的 研究经椎间孔入路和经椎板间入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并侧隐窝狭窄的疗效。方法 收集该院自2017年1月～2020年10月住院治疗的腰椎间盘突出症合并单侧隐窝狭窄135例患者的临床资料,根据不同手术入路分为两组：椎间孔组74例采用经椎间孔入路脊柱内镜手术治疗,椎板间组61例采用经椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术治疗。对两组患者的疗效指标进行比较。结果 两组患者术后1个月、6个月的VAS评分和ODI指数均较术前明显降低(P<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。椎间孔组的手术时间明显长于椎板间组(P<0.05),手术透视次数明显多于椎板间组(P<0.05)。结论 经椎间孔入路和经椎板间入路内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并侧隐窝狭窄均能取得较好疗效,但经椎板间入路手术相对更易操作,能够明显减少术中透视次数,缩短手术时间。     

腰椎不稳和腰椎滑脱的相关问题

<正>腰椎不稳或腰椎滑脱是导致腰腿痛的常见病因之一。然而在临床上,有关不稳和滑脱的界定、两者之间的关系、影像学诊断、治疗方案的合理选择、滑脱的复位等     

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and segmental lumbar lordosis

Introduction

The sagittal plane of body produces a convex curve anteriorly referred to as the lordotic curve. Malalignment of lordotic curve leads to low back disorders and lumbar spinal surgery has been known to cause this. This study was a retrospective analysis of the effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cages on segmental lumbar lordosis.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study involving 27 patients of which 16 were females and 11 were males. All patients underwent single level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with insertion of non-wedged intervertebral cage and pedicle screw fixation. Intraoperatively, all patients had a change from knee chest position to prone to augment their lumbar lordosis. The minimum follow up was 2 years and fusion was achieved in 21 patients.

Results

Segmental lordotic angles increased from 15.2° to 20.6° at L4/5 level and from 17.8° to 24.5° at L5/S1 level, preoperative to postoperative, respectively (P < 0.01 at both levels).

Conclusion

Thus apparently, posterior lumbar interbody fusion with insertion of non-wedged intervertebral cage and pedicle screw fixation results in creation and maintenance of lumbar lordosis.     

经皮全脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症

[目的]研究经皮全脊柱内镜技术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及安全性。[方法]回顾性研究2013年1月~2015年1月连续接受手术治疗的153例单节段伴有单侧神经根性症状的腰椎间盘突出症患者,其中68例行经皮全脊柱内镜下腰椎间盘髓核摘除术(内镜组),85例行开放腰椎间盘髓核摘除术(开放组)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、Mac Nab评分评定疗效。[结果]所有患者均完成手术,内镜组有1例出现神经根损伤。其他患者未发生神经、血管损伤等严重并发症。内镜组手术时间大于开放组,术中出血量、切口长度小于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后3 d和末次随访时腰痛VAS评分内镜组显著小于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),术后3 d腿痛VAS评分内镜组小于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),末次随访时两组腿痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。内镜组末次随访时ODI指数小于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),两组疗效优良率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后腰痛、腿痛VAS评分显著小于术前,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),内镜组术后3 d和末次随访时腰痛、腿痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。开放组术后3 d和末次随访时腰痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05),末次随访时腿痛VAS评分小于术后3 d,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。[结论]经皮全脊柱内镜下腰椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症安全有效,创伤小,恢复快,是开放腰椎间盘髓核摘除术很好的替代技术。     

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration

As life expectancy increases, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) becomes a common health problem among the elderly. DLSS is usually caused by degenerative changes in bony and/or soft tissue elements. The poor correlation between radiological manifestations and the clinical picture emphasizes the fact that more studies are required to determine the natural course of this syndrome. Our aim was to reveal the association between lower lumbar spine configuration and DLSS. Two groups were studied: the first included 67 individuals with DLSS (mean age 66 ± 10) and the second 100 individuals (mean age 63.4 ± 13) without DLSS-related symptoms. Both groups underwent CT images (Philips Brilliance 64) and the following measurements were performed: a cross-section area of the dural sac, vertebral body dimensions (height, length and width), AP diameter of the bony spinal canal, lumbar lordosis and sacral slope angles. All measurements were taken at L3 to S1. Vertebral body lengths were significantly greater in the DLSS group at all levels compared to the control, whereas anterior vertebral body heights (L3, L4, L5) and middle vertebral heights (L3, L5) were significantly smaller in the LSS group. Lumbar lordosis, sacral slope and bony spinal canal were significantly smaller in the DLSS compared to the control. We conclude that the size and shape of vertebral bodies and canals significantly differed between the study groups. A tentative model is suggested to explain the association between these characteristics and the development of degenerative spinal stenosis.     

经椎间孔入路与经后方入路椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎失稳症的疗效比较

目的回顾性研究经后方入路椎体间融合术（posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF）和切除上、下关节突的经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术（transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF）治疗腰椎失稳症的疗效及并发症情况。方法采用PLIF和TLIF治疗2004年1月至2008年1月本院收治的退变性腰椎失稳症患者78例,其中PLIF31例,TLIF47例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、平均卧床时间、Nakai评分优良率、融合时间（按Suk标准）及术后并发症发生率。对两组术前及末次随访时的椎间隙高度及椎间孔高度进行对比研究。结果 78例患者均获随访,随访时间1.5～4.5年,平均3.5年。所有患者均获椎间骨性融合。对两组卧床时间、Nakai评分优良率、融合时间、同时间点椎间隙高度和椎间孔高度进行比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;而在手术时间、出血量以及术后并发症发生率方面,两组之间的差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组末次随访时的椎间隙高度和椎间孔高度均较术前有明显改善（P〈0.05）。结论 TLIF和PLIF治疗退变性腰椎失稳症效果良好;与PLIF相比,TLIF操作简单,出血量小,并发症少。     

腰椎滑脱和腰椎不稳的诊断和治疗

<正>腰椎滑脱症和腰椎不稳是目前临床上最为常见的腰椎疾患。在同一个病例中,两种病变经常同时存在,但两种病变的概念是有区别的,腰椎滑脱应是一种静态概     

双侧经皮穿刺椎间盘切吸术治疗腰椎间盘突出症

自１９９６年１月到１９９７年３月,我们将１０４例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为单侧经皮穿刺切吸组（Ａ组）、双侧经皮穿刺切吸组（Ｂ组）。随访６～１８个月,结果显示,双侧经皮穿刺椎间盘切吸术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效优于单侧穿刺切吸术。１资料与方法１１临床资...